Optimizing the safety and practice of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: The role of echogenic technology

aSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia bSir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Current opinion in anaesthesiology (Impact Factor: 1.98). 07/2012; 25(5):603-9. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328356b835
Source: PubMed


Significant improvements have been made in the quality of ultrasound imaging, and it is now much easier to see nerves. However, the key to safe ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia is to be able to direct the needle to the target. This relies on good needle visibility. We review the recent advances that have been made in this crucial area.
Echogenic needles can improve shaft and tip visibility independent of experience level, compensate for suboptimal scanning technique, allow steeper insertion angles, reduce technical difficulty, and increase both confidence and satisfaction by anesthesiologists. An echogenic needle encourages holding the probe in one place on the patient, only advancing the needle when it can be seen, hence reducing the likelihood of quality-compromising behaviors. The poor visibility of nonechogenic needles when inserted at steeper angles commonly causes the observer to underestimate the insertion depth of the needle. Significant differences in echogenicity are found when comparing the currently available needles.
Good echogenic needles should increase safety, efficacy, and simplicity, and hopefully further drive the adoption of ultrasound-guided techniques, to the benefit of our patients.

Download full-text


Available from: Graham Hocking
  • Source
    • "Needle visualization has been improving with the echogenic needles. In a review article of Hocking et al. 18 it was concluded that a good echogenic needle should increase efficacy, safety and simplicity. In a recent study, Guo et al. 19 compared different echogenic needles with non-echogenic needles in cadaver model and found echogenic needles more visible than non-echogenic needles. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: In this study we aimed to compare the echogenic needles and the nerve stimulation addition to non-echogenic needles in ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgery. Methods: 90 patients were enrolled to the study. The patients were allocated into three groups randomly: Group E (n=30): ultrasound guided axillary block using echogenic needle, Group N (n=30): ultrasound guided axillary block using non-echogenic needle, Group NS (n=30): ultrasound guided axillary block using non-echogenic needle with nerve stimulator assistance. Duration of block procedure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse-oximetry, onset time of sensory and motor block, duration of sensory and motor block, time to first analgesic use, total need for analgesics, postoperative pain scores, patient and surgeon satisfaction scores were recorded. Results: Duration of block procedure values were lower in group E and NS, sensory and motor block durations, were significantly lower in group N. Sensorial and motor block onset time values were found lower in group NS but higher in group N. Patient and surgeon satisfaction scores were found lower in group N. Conclusion: We conclude that ultrasound guided axillary block may be performed successfully using both echogenic needles and nerve stimulation assisted non-echogenic needles.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2013 · International journal of medical sciences
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Needle visualization in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia can be improved by using needles of echogenic design with higher rate of reflection of ultrasound waves. Imaging solutions such as compound imaging might further improve imaging of both needle and tissue; these effects have not yet been studied. We hypothesized that compound imaging would significantly improve needle visibility, regardless of the insertion angle or needle type used. The effects of compound imaging on needle artifacts and tissue imaging were also investigated. Methods: A total of 200 video clips of in-plane needle insertions were obtained in embalmed cadavers with a conventional needle and an echogenic needle at 5 different insertion angles, with both conventional B-mode ultrasound imaging and compound imaging technology. Visibility of the needle shaft and needle tip as well as the needle artifact rate were assessed by a blinded investigator on a 4-point ordinal scale. The effects on tissue image quality and speckle artifacts were also assessed. Stepwise linear regression was performed to differentiate effects on needle visibility scores. Results: Imaging of the needle shaft and tip was significantly enhanced when compound imaging technology was used (P < 0.0001). Use of echogenically designed needles or shallow needle insertion angles improved visibility of both shaft and tip (both P < 0.0001). With compound imaging, there are fewer needle artifacts, and tissue imaging quality and speckle artifact rate are significantly improved. Conclusions: Compound imaging technology enhances needle imaging with both echogenic and conventional needles. Tissue imaging and speckle artifacts are also optimized. Echogenic needle design results in better needle visibility scores in both B-mode and compound imaging.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2013 · Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Urologists are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of pre-treatment percutaneous renal biopsy of small renal cortical neoplasms. A barrier to the routine performance of ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy has been the technical challenges associated with the procedure. We evaluated a new modified needle, which incorporates an echogenic needle tip designed to improve the needle tip's visibility under ultrasound visualization. We evaluated and compared the ultrasonic imaging quality of the echogenic needle (EN) and a standard needle (SN). Forty-eight participants were recruited to perform ultrasound-guided needle targeting and drainage of a simulated cyst within a phantom model. The simulated cysts were embedded in an opaque gel mold. Each participant was blinded to the type of needle being deployed and was asked to identify and aspirate the simulated cyst with each needle under ultrasound guidance. Each needle was tested at three ultrasound-aiming angles, (0, 15, and 30 degrees). The quality of needle visibility under ultrasound imaging was assessed via a questionnaire, including needle preference and a visibility score (1-10) at each aiming angle. Participants were stratified by level of ultrasound experience. For each angle tested, the EN received higher visibility ratings. The mean visibility scores for the EN versus the SN were 6.44 vs. 5.52 at 0 degrees (p=0.001), 7.77 vs. 6.96 at 15 degrees (p=0.0004) and 8.33 vs. 7.54 at 30 degrees (p=0.0001). Participants reported significantly greater comfort using the EN needle compared to the SN (p= 0.001). These results held true regardless of the sequence of needle tested first. Also there was a significant difference in visibility scores by angle (p=0.0001). Larger angles (30>15>0) resulted in higher scores. In this in vitro trial, the application of the EN improved needle visibility for users of all levels of experience. Clinical correlation is pending.
    No preview · Article · Jun 2013 · Journal of endourology / Endourological Society
Show more