Explores the reasons that national and local forest management systems have failed to protect local supplies of ironwood occurring in the dipterocarp forests of West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Traditional ironwood management focused on the regulation of outsiders' access to the trees and an information "ethic of access' guiding its use and distribution among village households. Kalimantan forest management is now dominated by industrial timber extraction. The indirect effects of logging on village forest management have had a staggering impact on the social organization of forest use. Chainsaws and logging roads have facilitated villagers' commercial harvest of ironwood and generated changes in the villagers' management of the wood. Private control has taken precedence over common (village controls, and the ethic of access has been transformed. The article concludes that some traditional institutions could be expowered by the state to protect both forest resources and lcoal claims in a joint forest management arrangement. -from Author