Article

e-Cigarette Awareness, Use, and Harm Perceptions in US Adults

The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Legacy, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.55). 07/2012; 102(9):1758-66. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300526
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

We estimated e-cigarette (electronic nicotine delivery system) awareness, use, and harm perceptions among US adults.
We drew data from 2 surveys conducted in 2010: a national online study (n = 2649) and the Legacy Longitudinal Smoker Cohort (n = 3658). We used multivariable models to examine e-cigarette awareness, use, and harm perceptions.
In the online survey, 40.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 37.3, 43.1) had heard of e-cigarettes, with awareness highest among current smokers. Utilization was higher among current smokers (11.4%; 95% CI = 9.3, 14.0) than in the total population (3.4%; 95% CI = 2.6, 4.2), with 2.0% (95% CI = 1.0, 3.8) of former smokers and 0.8% (95% CI = 0.35, 1.7) of never-smokers ever using e-cigarettes. In both surveys, non-Hispanic Whites, current smokers, young adults, and those with at least a high-school diploma were most likely to perceive e-cigarettes as less harmful than regular cigarettes.
Awareness of e-cigarettes is high, and use among current and former smokers is evident. We recommend product regulation and careful surveillance to monitor public health impact and emerging utilization patterns, and to ascertain why, how, and under what conditions e-cigarettes are being used.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: David B Abrams, Jan 05, 2014
  • Source
    • "c decisions before ads air and to make changes during the course of campaigns: increasing airtime for a particular ad, removing a spot from rotation, selecting the most effective messages for an upcoming broadcast cycle, and so on. Several methods have been used for acquiring participants for such surveys, including established Internet panels (cf.Pearson, Richardson, Niaura, Vallone, & Abrams, 2012). Internet panels are created by companies as existing groups of people who can be invited to participate in research based on predetermined selection criteria, such as demographics, behavioral characteristics, or areas of expertise or interest. Established panel methods can be both quick and inexpensive and can provide a consistent cro"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: This article describes two examples of online ad testing used to assess effectiveness of tobacco control ads in Minnesota (United States). The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends mass-media campaigns to change tobacco-related attitudes and encourage quitting. ClearWay MinnesotaSM uses online surveys to test ads with target audiences, select the most effective ads, and complement traditional evaluations of its campaigns. Two examples in this article demonstrate the method and how results have been used.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · Social Marketing Quarterly
  • Source
    • "as low , except for e - cigarettes . In another US survey among 6307 adults , 40 . 2% had heard of e - cigarettes , with awareness highest among current smokers . Utilization was higher among current smokers ( 11 . 4% ) than in the total population ( 3 . 4% ) , with 2 . 0% of former smokers and 0 . 8% of never - smokers ever using e - cigarettes ( Pearson et al . , 2012 ) . A Web - based survey performed by inter - viewing 4444 US college students in North Carolina found an average prevalence of e - cigarette use of 4 . 9% , with 1 . 5% reporting past month use ( Sutfin et al . , 2013 ) . Although e - cigarette use was more common among conventional cigarette smokers , 12% of ever e - cigarette users h"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Waterpipe (WP) smoking is growing as an alternative to cigarette smoking, especially in younger age groups. E-cigarette use has also increased in recent years. A majority of smokers mistakenly believe that WP smoking is a social entertainment practice that leads to more social behavior and relaxation and that this type of smoking is safe or less harmful and less addictive than cigarette smoking. In reality, WP smokers are exposed to hundreds of toxic substances that include known carcinogens. High exposures to carbon monoxide and nicotine are major health threats. Persons exposed to secondhand WP smoke are also at risk. There is growing evidence that WP smoke causes adverse effects on the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems and is responsible for cancer.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2015 · Atmospheric Environment
  • Source
    • "Ever use of ECIGs increased from 2% in 2010 to 6% in 2011 (King et al., 2013). Most ECIG users appear to be smokers of conventional cigarettes (Regan et al., 2011; McMillen et al., 2012; Pearson et al., 2012; King et al., 2013). Other data show that " dual users " of tobacco (users of both cigarettes and cigars) are more likely to have ever used ECIGs than those who smoke only cigarettes (Richardson et al., 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs), also referred to as electronic nicotine delivery systems or "e-cigarettes," generally consist of a power source (usually a battery) and heating element (commonly referred to as an atomizer) that vaporizes a solution (e-liquid). The user inhales the resulting vapor. Electronic cigarettes have been increasing in popularity since they were introduced into the US market in 2007. Many questions remain about these products, and limited research has been conducted. This review describes the available research on what ECIGs are, effects of use, survey data on awareness and use, and the utility of ECIGs to help smokers quit using tobacco cigarettes. This review also describes arguments for and against ECIGs and concludes with steps to move research on ECIGs forward.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2014 · Journal of Addiction Medicine
Show more