... Thus, the most common response at this point in the qualitative-quantitative debate is a call for some sort of integration of the two methodologies, variously labeled "methodological eclecticism" (Hammersley, 1996;Priola, Smith, & Armstrong, 2004;cf. Yanchar & Williams, 2006), "methodological pluralism" (Dawson, Fischer, & Stein, 2006;Payne, Williams, & Chamberlain, 2005;Richards & Bergin, 2005;Sechrest & Sidani, 1995;Slife & Gantt, 1999;Yanchar, 1997), or "mixed methods" (Bryman, 2006;Creswell & Plano Clark, 2007;Curlette, 2006;Giddings & Grant, 2006;Greene, Benjamin, & Goodyear, 2001;Hanson, Creswell, Plano Clark, Petska, & Creswell, 2005;Harden & Thomas, 2005;Johnstone, 2004;Kelle, 2006;Kelley, 2007;Mason, 2006;Shank, 2006;Stange, Crabtree, & Miller, 2006;Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003). As the term mixed methods has become most prominent, I use it to refer generally to attempts at the integration of qualitative and quantitative methodologies. ...