Content uploaded by Frédéric Bloch
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Frédéric Bloch on Jan 20, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Often these adults should not be exposed to potentially
hazardous diagnostic procedures, particularly when dental
screening in noninvasive physical examinations can yield
pertinent clinical information.
This study found oral health to be a low priority for
younger and less-experienced providers. Educational
efforts should focus on this demographic, who are launch-
ing their medical careers in an aging society.
Ishtpreet Uppal, MD
Natalya Bangiyeva, MD
Gisele P. Wolf-Klein, MD
Department of Medicine, North Shore-LIJ Health System
New Hyde Park, New York
Edwin Ginsberg, DMD
Department of Dental Medicine, North Shore-LIJ Health
System, Manhasset, New York
Renee Pekmezaris, PhD
Christian N. Nouryan, MA
Department of Health Services Research, North Shore-LIJ
Health System, Great Neck, New York
Renee Pekmezaris, PhD
Lisa Rosen, ScM
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset
New York
Renee Pekmezaris, PhD
Gisele P. Wolf-Klein, MD
Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead
New York
Renee Pekmezaris, PhD
Gisele P. Wolf-Klein, MD
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
Monica Chawla, MD
Sophie Davis School of Biomedical Education
New York, New York
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to recognize the efforts of Marie
Ilagan and Jill Cotroneo for administrative support.
Conflict of Interest: The editor in chief has reviewed
the conflict of interest checklist provided by the authors
and has determined that the authors have no financial or
any other kind of personal conflicts with this paper.
Author Contributions: Ishtpreet Uppal, Edwin
Ginsberg, Renee Pekmezaris, Lisa Rosen, Monica Chawla,
Natalya Bangiyeva, Christian Nouryan, and Gisele
Wolf-Klein developed the original concept and design.
Ishtpreet Uppal, Monica Chawla, and Natalya Bangiyeva
collected the data. Lisa Rosen, Renee Pekmezaris, and
Christian Nouryan analyzed and interpreted the data. All
authors made significant contributions to the drafting and
revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final
version of the manuscript.
Sponsor’s Role: No sponsor.
REFERENCES
1. Moore MJ, Moir P, Patrick MM et al. The State of Aging and Health in
America 2004 [on-line]. Available at http://www.agingsociety.org/agingsoci-
ety/pdf/SAHA_2004.pdf Accessed November 11, 2011.
2. Beltra
´n-Aguilar ED, Barker LK, Canto MT, et al. Surveillance for dental
caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis—
United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2002. MMWR Surveill Summ
2005;54:1–43.
3. Triadafilopoulos G. Oral diseases and disorders. In: Cobbs EL, Duthie EH,
Murphy JB, eds. Geriatric Review Syllabus: A Core Curriculum in Geriatric
Medicine, 5th Ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing 2002, pp 321–326.
4. Shay K, Picot BL, Picot SJ. Oral diseases and disorders. In: Resnick B,
Mitty E, eds. Assisted Living Nursing: A Manual for Management and
Practice. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, 2009, pp 267–
276.
5. Dolan TA, Atchison K, Huynh TN. Access to dental care among older
adults in the United States. J Dent Educ 2005;69:961–974.
6. Dental Diseases and Oral Health. World Health Organization [on-line].
Available at http://www.who.int/oral_health/publications/en/orh_fact_sheet.
pdf Accessed November 11, 2011.
7. Pucar A, Milasin J, Lekovic V, et al. Correlation between atherosclerosis
and periodontal putative pathogenic bacterial infections in coronary and
internal mammary arteries. J Periodontol 2007;78:677–682.
8. Lockhart PB, Brennan MT, Thornhill M, et al. Poor oral hygiene as a risk
factor for infective endocarditis–related bacteremia. J Am Dent Assoc
2009;140:1238–1244.
9. Barrington JW, Barrington TA. What is the true incidence of dental pathol-
ogy in the total joint arthroplasty population? J Arthroplasty 2011;26(6
Suppl):88–91.
10. Yasny JS. Perioperative dental considerations for the anesthesiologist.
Anesth Analg 2009;108:1564–1573.
CRITICAL FALLS: WHY REMAINING ON THE
GROUND AFTER A FALL CAN BE DANGEROUS,
WHATEVER THE FALL
To the Editor: As people age, it becomes increasingly diffi-
cult for them to rise after a fall. Healthy elderly adults
require twice as long to stand up as younger patients. Those
in institutions need three to four times as long to rise as
healthy elderly adults, if they can actually do so.
1
In another
study, 25% of elderly adults were unable to rise from an
accidental fall.
2
It has been shown that reaching the age of
80 is a risk factor independently associated with inability to
rise from the ground after a fall (adjusted relative risk
(RR) =1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) =1.2–2.1).
3
This inability to rise from the ground after a fall is
dangerous because of the length of time spent lying on the
floor. This time depends on the individual’s ability to rise
after falling and on whether help is available.
4
The risk of
remaining for extended periods on the ground in elderly
adults has been associated mainly with a major injury in
individuals with reduced autonomy but also with body
temperature above 37.5°C or potassium serum level
<3.5 mmol/L.
5
Finally, a fall often results from a traumatic
functional disability that can explain the inability to rise,
but not all of these cases are always related to a trauma
itself. In addition to all of the consequences of the fall
itself, prolonged immobilization on the ground will have
many repercussions for poor prognosis for recovery.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of early mortal-
ity related to inability to rise after a fall was conducted in
elderly adults.
JAGS JULY 2012–VOL. 60, NO. 7 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 1375
A computer search strategy on MEDLINE using the
Medical Subject Headings accidental falls and aged 80 and
over identified 3,401 articles published from 1981 to
2011; 3,333 were excluded, leaving 68 articles concerning
prospective studies about consequences and prognosis after
falls in elderly adults, to which two references from a
manual search were added to obtain 70 studies. Selecting
studies with numerical data on mortality in groups lying
or not lying on the ground for extended periods of
time, four studies were included.
3,6–8
A meta-analysis was
performed, and the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs to
assess mortality related to inability to rise after a fall
were estimated for each study and overall. The Mantel–
Haenszel fixed-effects method was used.
9
Heterogeneity
was assessed using the I²statistic.
10
One study was excluded because of a different meth-
odology that compromised the consistency of the results.
7
The OR for the association between lying on the floor for
a long time and mortality in all participants studied was
1.75 (95% CI =1.15–2.67) (Figure 1). This result was
moderately homogeneous (I²=33%).
The current study shows that lying on the floor for a
long period after a fall nearly doubles the risk of death.
Even a seemingly minor fall can be fatal if the person stays
lying on the ground for a long time because of pressure
ulcers, dehydration, hypothermia, rhabdomyolysis, or renal
failure, all of these disorders being likely to compromise
survival.
6
It was possible to include only four studies out of
3,401 (<0.2%) because many articles concerned the conse-
quences of traumatic falls-related injuries but not all type
of falls. Published articles on the consequences or progno-
sis of falls far too often give results in which falls are
categorized according to type (severe, repeated, injurious,
or traumatic fall), population subgroups, or place of
occurrence.
This meta-analysis can help to define the association
between early mortality and inability to rise after a fall,
but multivariate analyses could have helped to estimate the
real degree of connection. The strategy was limited and
must be used as a complement to systematic review when
studying consequences of falls, but it is too restrictive to
focus only on traumatic falls in this case, because it is diffi-
cult to say whether it is the trauma itself that is responsi-
ble for the consequences or the inability to recover.
The term “critical fall” is thus proposed to characterize
a fall with an inability to retain upright posture, whatever
the reason: trauma, feeling unwell, or lack of warning.
Orienting the characterization of falls this way seems
relevant for future studies, and being able to isolate this
group of falls with severe consequences will allow the
development of appropriate prevention strategies. Further-
more, early detection devices are crucial for the reduction
of mortality in this type of fall.
Fre
´de
´ric Bloch, MD, PhD
Department of Gerontology 1, Ho
ˆpital Broca, Paris
France
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Conflict of Interest: The editor in chief has reviewed the
conflict of interest checklist provided by the author and
has determined that the author has no financial or any
other kind of personal conflicts with this paper.
Author Contributions: F. Bloch is responsible for the
entire content of this paper.
Sponsor’s Role: None.
REFERENCES
1. Alexander NB, Ulbrich J, Raheja A et al. Rising from the floor in older
adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:564–569.
2. Asbjornsen G, Braathen L, Mellemstuen H. [Are old patients able to get up
from the floor?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2000;120:3119–3120.
3. Tinetti ME, Liu WL, Claus EB. Predictors and prognosis of inability to get
up after falls among elderly persons. JAMA 1993;269:65–70.
4. Fleming J, Brayne C. Inability to get up after falling, subsequent time on
floor, and summoning help: Prospective cohort study in people over 90.
BMJ 2008;337:a2227.
5. Ryynanen OP, Kivela SL, Honkanen R et al. Falls and lying helpless in the
elderly. Z Gerontol 1992;25:278–282.
6. Bloch F, Jegou D, Dhainaut JF et al. Can metabolic abnormalities after a
fall predict short term mortality in elderly patients? Eur J Epidemiol
2009;24:357–362.
7. Gurley RJ, Lum N, Sande M et al. Persons found in their homes helpless
or dead. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1710–1716.
8. Wild D, Nayak US, Isaacs B. Prognosis of falls in old people at home. J Ep-
idemiol Community Health 1981;35:200–204.
9. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from ret-
rospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719–748.
10. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al. Measuring inconsistency in
meta-analysis. BMJ 2003;327:557–560.
SHOULD MAXIMUM CONSERVATIVE
MANAGEMENT BE THE STANDARD PARADIGM
FOR VERY ELDERLY ADULTS WITH CHRONIC
KIDNEY DISEASE OR IS THERE A ROLE FOR
DIALYSIS?
To the Editor: The incidence and prevalence of very
elderly adults reaching chronic kidney disease Stage 5
Figure 1. Meta-analysis of the association between lying on the floor for a long period and mortality. M-H =Mantel–Haenszel.
1376 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR JULY 2012–VOL. 60, NO. 7 JAGS