ArticlePDF Available

Development of a Dynamic Simulation Approach to Mission Risk and Reliability Analysis

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

This paper describes a NASA-funded project to develop reliability analysis software capable of modeling complex, highly dynamic systems over the duration of a mission, taking into account variation in input parameters and the evolution of the system. It is designed as an extension to GoldSim, a simulation program which is widely used for Performance Assessment in the nuclear arena, most notably at Yucca Mountain. To illustrate the GoldSim approach to reliability modeling, two NASA examples that have previously been evaluated using classical PRA models were developed using the simulation approach. Issues surrounding the translation of the classical PRA models to a simulation-based approach are discussed, and areas where the simulation approach provided additional insights into the system's behavior are highlighted.
Content may be subject to copyright.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
This article discusses the use of quantitative risk assessment (QRA) in decision making regarding the safety of complex technological systems. The insights gained by QRA are compared with those from traditional safety methods and it is argued that the two approaches complement each other. It is argued that peer review is an essential part of the QRA process. The importance of risk-informed rather than risk-based decision making is emphasized. Engineering insights derived from QRAs are always used in combination with traditional safety requirements and it is in this context that they should be reviewed and critiqued. Examples from applications in nuclear power, space systems, and an incinerator of chemical agents are given to demonstrate the practical benefits of QRA. Finally, several common criticisms raised against QRA are addressed.
Article
Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained in the 1992 performance assessment (PA) for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) are presented. The primary performance measure under study is the complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF) used in assessing compliance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) standard for the geologic disposal of radioactive waste (40 CFR 191, Subpart B). The analysis considers releases to the accessible environment initiated by exploratory drilling for natural resources and models cuttings removal to the surface due to drilling intrusions, brine and gas flow in the vicinity of the repository and through drilling intrusions away from the repository, radionuclide transport by the flow of brine through intruding boreholes, and brine flow and radionuclide transport in permeable formations overlying the repository (i.e., the Culebra Dolomite). The effects of 49 imprecisely known variables are assessed with techniques based on Latin hypercube sampling and regression analysis. In addition, the effects of several alternative conceptual models for radionuclide transport in the Culebra Dolomite are investigated. Important issues identified in the analysis include (1) the importance of characterizing retardations and solubilities for individual elements, (2) the impact of assumptions involving human activities, including the rate and properties of drilling intrusions, and (3) the need to resolve the question of whether a single-porosity or dual-porosity transport model is appropriate for use in the Culebra Dolomite.
Article
The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is under development by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for the geologic (deep underground) disposal of transuranic (TRU) waste. This development has been supported by a sequence of performance assessments (PAs) carried out by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) to assess what is known about the WIPP and to provide guidance for future DOE research and development activities. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis procedures based on Latin hypercube sampling and regression techniques play a major role in these PAs by providing an assessment of the uncertainty in important analysis outcomes and identifying the sources of this uncertainty. Performance assessments for the WIPP are conceptually and computationally interesting due to regulatory requirements to assess and display the effects of both stochastic (i.e., aleatory) and subjective (i.e., epistemic) uncertainty, where stochastic uncertainty arises from the possible disruptions that could occur over the 10000 yr regulatory period associated with the WIPP and subjective uncertainty arises from an inability to unambiguously characterize the many models and associated parameters required in a PA for the WIPP. The interplay between uncertainty analysis, sensitivity analysis, stochastic uncertainty and subjective uncertainty is discussed and illustrated in the context of a recent PA carried out by SNL to support an application by the DOE to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for the certification of the WIPP for the disposal of TRU waste.
Article
Dynamic reliability methods are powerful mathematical frameworks capable of handling interactions among components and process variables explicitly. In principle, they constitute a more realistic modeling of systems for the purposes of reliability, risk and safety analysis. Although there is a growing recognition in the risk community of the potentially greater correctness of these methods, no serious effort has been undertaken to utilize them in industrial applications.User-friendly tools would help foster usage of dynamic reliability methods in the industry. This paper defines the key components of such a platform and for each component, provides a detailed review of techniques available for their implementation. This paper attempts to provide milestones in the creation of a high level design of such tools. To achieve this purpose, a modular approach is used. For each part, various existing techniques are discussed with respect to their potential achievements. Issues related to expected future developments are also considered.
Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications
  • W Vesely
W. VESELY et al., "Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications", NASA, 2002.