Content uploaded by Azizah Abdul Rahman
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Azizah Abdul Rahman on Sep 01, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
ORGANIZATIONAL MEMORY INFORMATION SYSTEM
CASE STUDY IN FACULTY OF COMPUTER SCIENCE &
INFORMATION SYSTEM, UTM
Azizah Abdul Rahman
Saidatul Rahah Hamidi
University Technology of Malaysia, Malaysia.
azizah@fsksm.utm.my
The paper’s purposes IS to evaluate the need for organizational memory
information system (OMIS) in Faculty of Computer Science and Information
System to improve academic management. Approach adopted in this research is
to implement OMIS characteristics. After examining few models of
organizational memory in literature review, OMIS characteristics is identified
for implementation and success factor model to assess the OMIS. There are
three possible forms of OMIS, namely paper documents, computer documents
and self-memory. IT-based memory is quasi-permanent; knowledge is logged,
indexed, secured and organized in such a way that it becomes accessible. IT
contributes to organizational memory in at least two ways; by making
accumulated knowledge accessible to organization members or by making
individuals with knowledge known. OMIS could be achieved by effectively
applying framework of OMIS, which include elements of individual, culture,
transformation, structure, ecology, external environment, computer based
information system and non-IT record and files. This paper indicates that there
are 5 blocks of success factor to evaluate OMIS implementation; system
quality, information quality, success measure in terms of usage, individual
impact and organizational impact. The research is proposed as a prototype to
be implemented for the whole module of FSKSM in order to protect their
intellectual capital and optimizing the efficiency by managing organizational
memory. The paper provides details of solution to academic management on
the approach to making organizational memory information system work in
practice. The approaches to manage memories in the model have yielded a
number of benefits as demonstrated by a case study. This work will be
beneficial to researchers and practitioner who are interested in applying OMIS
in organization.
Organization will be more efficient and gain competitive advantage with the
utilization of collective memories. These memories can be in a form of data,
information, or knowledge regarding problem solving and decision making.
1
Which is inefficient organization will re-do process and research to the same
area for the same problem or situation. Besides, this lack of memories due to
staff replacement can cause a “corporate amnesia” (Borghoff and Pareschi,
1998; Kransdorff, 1998). As a result, we need to construct an Organizational
Memory (OM).
OM is defined as a method for acquisition, retention, retrieval and
knowledge accessible for organizational purposes (Walsh and Ungson, 1991).
OM also called “corporate knowledge” or “corporate genetic” by Pralahad and
Hamel (1994) and “corporate memory” by Annie (1999). Rose et al. (1998)
also use the term “corporate memory” for knowledge repository that being used
as a knowledge management tool.
In this paper, we will discuss about OMIS background and its’
implementation towards a case study in FSKSM. The case study will focus to
Unit of Academic Management. As a year past by, data, information and
knowledge had increased, then became wasted memories due to retired staff,
died or replace to another department. This could give great impact when
intellectual property did not being used wisely especially as competitive
advantage element. Therefore, there is a need to manage memories accordingly.
Otherwise, time, money and energy are wasted when the same task, research
and findings need to be done repeatedly.
Literature Review
Organizational Memory
Organizational memory (OM) is one of main component in organizational
learning environment but limited to it’s’ concept. Basically, OM is organized
from two artifacts which is mental and structure. Data, information and
knowledge will perform as mental. Otherwise structure involves process or
knowledge creation. However, OM can be assign as repositories of knowledge
for future use. Besides that, it can store not only raw data or information but
also the meaning of it. Then, because of this benefit awareness, information
technology (IT) had been seen as a mechanism for better utilization in OM.
Computer base system can give information automatically in shorter time and
precisely.
(OM = mental + structure)
2
Figure 1: OM Framework (Walsh and Ungson, 1991)
Decision Making Environment
Information Retrieval
6
External
Archive
1
Indivi-
du
al
2
Culture 3
Transfor-
mati
o
n
4
Role/
S
tr
uc
t
u
r
e
5
Ecology
Knowledge
Creation
Retention Facilities
Or
g
anization
OMIS
The memories can be stored separately based on requirements and is not
compulsory to be in centralized manner. Walsh and Ungson also introduced six
“bins” that can be use as retrieval components that construct the OM
framework. The components are (I) individuals and their corresponding files,
notes, records, etc.; (2) culture, a learned way of perceiving, thinking, and
feeling about problems, (3) transformations, or the logic that guides the
transformation of inputs (e.g., raw materials, new recruits, insurance claims)
into outputs (e.g., finished products, company veterans, insurance payments);
(4) structures, described as roles and expected behaviors; and (5) ecology, the
layout of the physical workplace. (6) external archives (e.g., memories of
former employees, knowledge of competitors, records of financial service
firms,).
Non-IT base memory usually lies in individual mental which it will be
an advantage if can be accessed and connected in understandable context.
Otherwise, it becomes loss as the individual leaves the organization (Nonaka,
1995) with the knowledge resides in their brains. Memories will damage in
terms as a whole and its’ accuracy across time.
Yet, there is still no agreement as to which technologies best support this
memory by whatever means. Lehner et al. (1998) suggested that organizational
memory cannot be served by a single technology. Baird and Cross (2000)
contend technology is not enough to accumulate information in electronic
repositories and organizational members rely upon a network of relationships
for both information and advice. Nevertheless, IT can be consider supporting
3
organizational memory. OM with technology support is called Organizational
Memory Information System (OMIS) by Wijnhoven (1999).
Introduction to Organizational Memory Information System (OMIS)
An OMIS is defined as “a system that functions to provide a means by which
knowledge from the past is brought to bear on present activities, thus resulting
in increased levels of effectiveness for the organization” (Stein and Zwass,
1995). Some authors use the terms Organizational Memory System (OMS).
OMS can be define as a system which (a) realizes parts of the organizational
knowledge base with the help of information and communications technologies
and/or (b) realizes and supports tasks, functions and procedures that are
connected to the use of the organizational knowledge base (Lehner et al., 1998).
Ackerman (1994) describes that OMS offer the possibility that computer
system can better serve the information storage and retrieval needs of an
organization’s memory can present technical and social methods. In essence,
some researchers view an OMIS or OMS as a component of organizational
memory.
OMIS Model
Wijnhoven had improved Walsh and Ungson (1991) organizational memory
framework. Wijnhoven (1999) suggest computer based information system and
non-IT record and files elements should be include supporting OMIS besides
individual, culture, transformation, structure, ecology and external
environment. In our case study, this model had been selected. We will discuss
this further in implementation part.
However, Stein and Zwass (1995) proposed a framework for an OMIS
consisting of two layers. The first layer incorporates four subsystems that
derive from four effectiveness functions; integration, adaptation, goal
attainment and pattern maintenance. Integration is a coordination and
management of information across the organization while adaptation is an
ability of the organization to adapt to changes in its environment. The third
subsystem, goal attainment depends on the ability of the organization to set
goals and evaluate the degree of their fulfillment. Next, pattern maintenance is
an organization ability in order to maintain the cohesion and the morale of the
workforce. The second layer consists of mnemonic functions including
4
knowledge acquisition, retention, maintenance, search, and retrieval. These two
layers can be either IT-based or non-IT-based.
Component of OMIS
Three forms of OMIS are possible: paper documents, computer documents, and
self-memory (Jennex, 1997). See figure 2 for the illustration.
• Paper documents are organization-wide references that reside in central
repositories such as a corporate library. Examples of paper documents
include reports, procedures, and technical standards. An important part
of this memory is in the chronological histories of changes and revisions
to these paper documents as they reflect the evolution of the
organization’s culture and decision making processes.
• Computer documents include all computer-based information that is
maintained at the work group level or beyond. These may be made
available through downloads to individual workstations, may reside in
central databases or file systems. Additionally, there are the processes
and protocols built into the information systems that are reflected in the
interface between the system and the user, by who has access to the
data, and by the formats structured system inputs and outputs.
• Self-memory includes all paper and computer documents that are
maintained by an individual. Typical components include files,
notebooks, written recollections, and other archives. These typically do
not have an official basis or format. Each person’s self-memory is
determined by what is important to that person and reflects that person’s
experience with the organization.
Figure 2: Component of OMIS
5
OMIS Success Model
Jennex et al. (1998) had come out with success model customization towards
OMIS context from the former De Lone and McLean’s (1992) I/S Success
Model (see Figure 3). The model is a block-recursive one that includes 5
blocks. The description of each block can be found in Table 1. This new model
has separate system quality and information quality into different block. This is
because the system quality block has been expanded to include the
characteristics of the OMIS.
Figure 3: OMIS Success Model (Jennnex et al.,1998)
Table 1: Description of OMIS Success Factors
Success
Factor (block) Description
System Quality Determine how good the system is in terms of its operational
characteristics. It contains three constructs: the technical
capabilities of the organization, the form of the OMIS, and the
level of the OMIS. Technical resources define the capability of
an organization to develop and maintain an OMIS.
Information
Quality In terms of its output. Factors in this category span a broad range
from importance, relevance, usefulness and in formativeness to
clarity, content, accuracy, and completeness. Information quality
affects the system usage block.
6
Success
Measure in
Terms of
Usage
Information use refers to the utilization of the system’s outputs.
It measured OMIS components with the usage on five
dimensions: number of tasks performed, actual daily usage,
frequency of use (e.g., hourly, daily, etc.), number of application
packages used, and level of sophistication of usage.
Individual
Impact The impact of an OMIS on an individual is rooted in
performance changes, but has other facets. It will be measured in
terms of productivity.
Organizational
Impact Organizational impacts relate to the effectiveness of the
organization as a whole. These measures relate to assessments
performed by external organizations, as well as those performed
internally.
Practitioner and researcher may use this model to justify the success
factors in implementation of OMIS in an organization. Begin with system
quality block to determine in terms of operational characteristics. Then will
lead to measure information quality for its output. The third block will measure
in terms of usage of OMIS components. Individual impact is to identify
individual performance due to productivity. Lastly, organizational impact of the
overall OMIS implementation will be assessing by internally and externally.
Case Study
Problem in Organizational Context
Faculty of Computer Science and Information System (FSKSM) is one of an
organization in University of Technology Malaysia. Core business of FSKSM
is learning and service. Many information need to be manage wisely, especially
in academic sector; thesis, curriculum, subject registration, and many other
academic artifacts. This study is about data, information and knowledge
management which is faculty’s intellectual property. Every year, there are
replacement and increment in terms of students and staffs. As a result,
intellectual property became overload and the changes done without control. In
fact, without our knowledge, faculty lost their property (treasure) when it
cannot be retrieved. Next, the lost can give impact towards faculty performance
and quality.
As for this study, the focus is unit of academic management in FSKSM.
Currently the faculty is running two Computer Science programmes and is
introducing six new specialization programmes for the coming intake. They are
7
facing problem intracking the curriculums for all the programmes. Furthermore
each semester, the lecturers are allowed to update the sylibus according to the
current technology and concepts. Several similar programmes and changes in
syllabus make some students and lecturers confused. This occurs when different
code for same subject but for different course. Besides that, the curriculum
information also hard to collect, and retrieved back. Other than that, thesis
became overloaded as the semester and year past by. This intangible asset is the
most powerful assets in faculty but yet to be lost without notice. The suggestion
here is to have a memory or some kind of repository to store and manage all
academic information. We called the OMIS solution for FSKSM as
“MemorIS”. Hope with the repository or storage bin provided in MemorIS can
protect our intellectual property and besides it can be retrieve to improve
excellent learning environment.
Implementation of OMIS Model
Element of OMIS
OMIS framework/model selected is proposed by Wijnhoven (1999) which had
been improved from Walsh and Ungson (1991) OM framework (See figure 1
for the illustration). The overall principal of this OMIS starts from the first
storage bin which is individual whom responsible to their own knowledge. In
order to retrieve back the information or knowledge, some kind of culture need
to be embedded. So the whole story of this information will play its role.
Besides that, third bin consists of process and procedure in
transformation of knowledge creation also takes part in this OMIS. However,
individual roles that responsible to this OM will be instructed in the structure.
Some changes had been made in order to meet the case study implementation,
whereby ecology bin was turn to be a “Meta-Memory”. This Meta-memory will
be a computer based knowledge repository. All IT based files and records will
stored here as suggested by Wijnhoven (1999). Last but not least, external bin
as non-IT resource such as paper document that store physically distributed
(example: Academic Guideline or “Buku Panduan Akademik”).
In summary, the above elements were constructed for FSKSM’s
memories. It is based on requirement and specifically for FSKSM. This was
implemented by combining elements suggested by Walsh and Ungson (1991)
and Wijnhoven (1999). Whereby, some of the element had been eliminate and
replace with other element that suit with OMIS application in FSKSM. Refer to
8
above OM (for Walsh and Ungson, 1991) and OMIS model (for Wijnhoven,
1999) sub topic.
Staff Characteristics
In order to perform this OMIS, some of the staff characteristics need to be
clarifies. Begin with top management of faculty which consists of dean, deputy
deans, registrar assistant and all head of departments. They should have the
initiatives of knowledge importance as intellectual property. Implementing
knowledge sharing culture will help to reduce the knowledge gap. Besides,
training given to the staffs shall increase their skills and knowledge.
Work Culture
Organizational Memory will be valuable and gives meaning if learning
environment can be implemented. Work culture is also one of element the
effect this OM implementation. Knowledge sharing culture and learning will
create not only effective working culture but also have competitive advantage.
In order to encourage knowledge sharing among the FSKSM community, the
log system is introduced to keep track of the academic artifact contributors and
the viewers of the artifact
.
Meta-Memory as Repository
In this research, meta-memory is a critical knowledge which contents of faculty
curriculum. This is because; meta-memory can give data about the requested
curriculum memory. From our findings, academic management really needs a
knowledge repository for them to emphasize their work besides solving
problem. Below is the suggested list of academic management meta-memories:
Table 2: List of Meta-Memories for Curriculum Management
No. Storage Meta-Memori
1. Paperwork Course name, title of paperwork, name of
person in-charge, file location, update date,
version, paperwork contents.
2. Specification
Programme Programme name, programme code, file
location
3. Syllabus L1 – Course
Outline Department name, subject name, subject code,
lecturer, update date, file location
4. Curriculum by
semester Programme name, course name, update date,
file location, person in-charge
9
5. Check list Checking date, person in-charge, list of
checking, notes
However there is several alternatives storage that will focus on IT-based
documents whereby files are kept in repository for easy in access. Besides that,
will provide the facilities for end-user to download and upload the documents
to MemorIS. Then, the hardcopy documents such as paperwork will be stored
distributed to responsible individual; head of department. Academic guideline
will provide to all students and master copy of it will be stored in Academic
Management office while the MemorIS will have the location information
provided to all.
OM Flow in FSKSM
This topic will show the flow of OM in FSKSM curriculum management.
• Stakeholder : Unit of Academic Management
• Object : Curriculum
• Artifacts : Paperwork, Syllibus L1 and Course Planning Outline
• Output: Checklist and programme assessment.
• Personal: Registrar Assistant, Head of Department and lecturer.
• Resource: Documents (paperwork and academic guideline)
Overall flow in MemorIS, in academic management (mainly curriculum) will
act differently. Assistant of Registrar will perform as system administrator to
assist in checklist for contents of faculty programmes. If there is some missing
point, then he/she will notify to responsible head of department for inquiry.
Figure 4: MemorIS Flow Model
10
Academic Management
Assistant of Registrar
Head of Department
Lecturer
Academic
Guideline
Booklet
Paperwork
Programme
Programme
Evaluation
Syllabus L1 –
Course Outline
Checklist
Responsible
for
Construct
Revise
Complete
for
Consequence
to
Verif
y
Documentation
Prepare
for
In order to complete the task, some lecturers will be appointed by head of
department via email with job task to be done. The process will help head of
department in managing the task and perform effectively. Besides that,
MemorIS also provide facilities for lecturer to interact and head of department
virtually by directly uploading and sharing the documents on-line. This is
actually to adopt the sharing culture to all members of FSKSM. However, the
above activities have to be supported by below utilities:
• Repository Backup – all documentation will have backup and stored in
other server. This is to ensure the data integrity and security.
• Checklist – is a list of repository content. To track the complete modules
in MemorIS.Head of department and system administrator can do
checking easily and identify incomplete contents and the steps to be
taken,
• Forum – place to voice out opinion and discussion on particular topics.
It is open discussion between lecturers and head of departments to get
better ideas and decisions. Besides to share opinion among members.
• Individual Diary – extra utility for better enhancement in private notes
and time management. Will have the information of activities and
important memo to remember.
11
Conclusion
In this paper, we have addressed the use of information technology to obviate
the problems involved in the use of organizational memory. Then, we explored
OMIS components and development strategies in terms of information types
and mnemonic processes which is OMIS framework. Through literature
analysis, insight has been gained into the different types of information that can
be incorporated into an OMIS. Finally, we have pointed out a model of OMIS
success with 5 blocks and different success factors. This model enables the
assessment of the extent to which an implemented OMIS in MemorIS will
achieve its potential with respect to enhancing organizational effectiveness and
competitive advantage. The result of the assessment will be reported in separate
article.
In our case study, there are several constraints that limit the scope of
this research especially in MemorIS development. For example, due to
distributed and unorganized information storage, some of this intellectual
property had been lost. However, MemorIS is a good start for unit of academic
management in FSKSM to protect their intellectual property. In conclusion, the
implementation of OMIS is very challenging since it involved dealing with soft
and hard issues such as technology and human factors. IT contributes as a core
element for knowledge management system then towards an organizational
learning. This initiative is parallel with UTM’s aspiration to adapt lifelong
learning.
As a result, we hope this article will contribute and guide the
practitioner as well as the researcher in implementing OMIS. Therefore, for
future research, we encourage further in implementation process and empirical
study in selected Malaysian organizations to justify and test the implementation
of OMIS model in Malaysian context. Furthermore, OMIS success model will
be the tools to self assess of the organization’s OMIS implementation.
References
Ackerman, M. S. and McDonald, D. W. (1996) Answer Garden 2:Merging
12
Organizational Memory with Collaborative Help. In M. S.Ackerman
(Ed.) Proceedings of ACM CSCW'96 Conference on Computer-
Supported Cooperative Work, ACM Press, New York
Ackerman, M. S.(1994). Definitional and Contextual Issues in Organizational
and Group Memories, in: Proceedings of the 27rh Hawaii International
Conference of System Sciences (HICSS).” Organizational Memory
minitrack
Annie Brooking (1999). Corporate Memory: Strategies for Knowledge
Management. International Thomson Business Press.
Baird, L. andCross, R. (2000). Technology is Not Enough: Improving
Performance by Building Organizational Memory Sloan Management
Review, Cambridge, 41(3) p.69-78.
Borgoff and Pareschi (1998). Information technology for knowledge
management. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R (1992). Information Systems Success: The
Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research,3 p.
60-95
Dodgson, M. (1993).Organizational learning: A review of some literatures.
Organization Studies, 14/3: 375-394
Jennex M. E., (1997). Organizational Memory Effects Productivity. Claremont
Graduate School,Claremont, CA.
Jennex M., Olfman L., Panthawi P., and Tong-Tae Park (1998). An
Organizational Memory Information System Success Model: An
Extension of De Lone and McLean’s I/S Success Model. International
Journal of IEEE, 1060-3425/98
Kransdorff, A. (1998). Corporate Amnesia. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
Lehner, F., Maier, R., and Klosa, O. (1998), Organisational Memory Systems –
Application of Advanced Database & Network Technologies, Research
Paper No. 19, University of Regensburg, Department of Business
Informatics.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Pralahad, C. K., and Hamel, G. (1994). . Competing For the Future MA.:
Harvard Business School Press.
Rose Dieng, Olivier Corby, Alain Giboin and Myriam Ribiere (1998). Methods
and Tools for Corporate Knowledge Management . Project ACACIA,
INRIA
Sophia Antipolis. Stein, E., Zwass, V. (1995). Actualizing Organizational
Memory with Information System. Information Systems Research,
Vol.6, No.2, p.85-117
13
Walsh, J.p. and Ungson (1991). Organizational Memory. The Academy of
Management Review.
Wijnhoven, F. (1999), Development Scenarios for Organizational Memory
Information Systems, Journal of MIS, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 121-146.
14
