ArticlePDF Available

Horizontal Collaboration in Flexible Supply Chains: A Simulation Study

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

In the current strong competitive industrial context, enterprises must react quickly to the market changes. In order to face this problem, enterprises must be flexible and collaborate together. Both the flexibility and collaboration requires high communication between various information systems at one hand and on the other hand the compatibility of their practices. Collaboration is mainly applied for inter-organizational purposes and that collaboration is known as vertical collaboration. In this research, the impact of the horizontal collaboration in the flexible supply chains has been studied. The flexible supply chains (FSCs) and horizontal collaboration between them has been modeled by using ARENA 7.0, a simulation package. The novelty of the paper is that it proposes the new paradigm of horizontal collaboration with flexible supply chains (FSCs). Horizontal collaboration can be a key issue for other enterprises to select the new business opportunities by exercising the collaboration. The total cost of supply chain is taken as the performance measurement. In this study, the total cost of a supply chain includes the ordering cost, inventory cost, and back order cost of all the nodes of flexible supply chain. To show the impact of collaboration, a numeric example has also been solved where two FScs have been considered with different inventory policies (s, S and s, Q) and distributor node has been deemed for collaboration of those supply chains.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Horizontal Collaboration in Flexible Supply
Chains: A Simulation Study
Anuj Prakash*. S.G.Deshmukh**
* Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indin Institute of
Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas , New Delhi, India
tel/fax: +91-991046888
e-mail: anujpra@gmail.com
** Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indin Institute of
Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas , New Delhi, India
tel/fax: +91-11-26591056
e-mail:deshmukh@mech.iitd.ac.in
Submitted:08/01/2010
Accepted:07/02/2010
Appeared: 16/02/2010
HyperSciences.Publisher
Abstract
In the current strong competitive industrial context, enterprises must react quickly to the
market changes. In order to face this problem, enterprises must be flexible and collaborate together. Both
the flexibility and collaboration requires high communication between various information systems at
one hand and on the other hand the compatibility of their practices. Collaboration is mainly applied for
inter-organizational purposes and that collaboration is known as vertical collaboration. In this research,
the impact of the horizontal collaboration in the flexible supply chains has been studied. The flexible
supply chains (FSCs) and horizontal collaboration between them has been modeled by using ARENA
7.0, a simulation package. The novelty of the paper is that it proposes the new paradigm of horizontal
collaboration with flexible supply chains (FSCs). Horizontal collaboration can be a key issue for other
enterprises to select the new business opportunities by exercising the collaboration. The total cost of
supply chain is taken as the performance measurement. In this study, the total cost of a supply chain
includes the ordering cost, inventory cost, and back order cost of all the nodes of flexible supply chain.
To show the impact of collaboration, a numeric example has also been solved where two FScs have been
considered with different inventory policies (s, S and s, Q) and distributor node has been deemed for
collaboration of those supply chains.
Keywords: Supply Chain Management, Collaborative Supply Chain, Flexible supply chain (FSC),
Horizontal collaboration, Inventory policies
1. INTRODUCTION
Today's business climate has rapidly changed and has
become more competitive as ever in nature. Businesses now
not only need to operate at a lower cost to compete, it must
also develop its own core competencies to distinguish itself
from competitors and stand out in the market. Enterprises are
now competing globally and traditional barriers between
industries are breaking down. Thus the main goal for
enterprises are maximizing added value and reducing total
cost across the entire trading process through focusing on
speed and certainty of response to the market. There is a
challenge for Supply chain networks to become more
efficient and more responsive to the increasingly demand of
customers, driven by competitive pressures and supported by
developments in information technology. Due to
globalization, Supply Chain Management (SCM) has become
a tool for companies to compete effectively either at a local
level or at a global scale. In order to meet the challenges of
the global market, companies are extending their supply
chain by adding more flexibility and cooperating with
partners whose complementary capabilities can give the
whole business network a competitive edge. The evolving
Flexible Supply Chains (FSC
s
) environment requires a
judicious combination of flexibility and cooperation based
integration. FSCs are a network that is composed of many
firms (i.e. nodes) in order to supply products responding to
customer demands where every individual node has an option
(i.e. flexibility) to select subsequent nodes based on
alternatives. FSC
s
are composed of many flows guided by
autonomous entities or nodes. Hereby collaborative supply
chain with flexibility planning approaches play a major role
in efficiently matching the demand of the market place with
supply capabilities of inter and intra organizational networks.
Collaboration is a negotiated cooperation between
independent parties by exchanging capabilities and sharing
burdens to improve collective responsiveness and
profitability. Specifically, inter-organizational collaboration
is defined as: “a process in which organizations exchange
information, alter activities, share resources and enhance each
Journal of Studies on Manufacturing (Vol.1-2010/Iss.1)
Prakash and Deshmukh / Horizontal Collaboration in Flexible Supply Chains … / pp. 54-58
Copyright © 2010 HyperSciences_Publisher. All rights reserved 54 www.hypersciences.org
other’s capacity for mutual benefits and a common purpose
by sharing risks, responsibilities and rewards.” Thus,
companies tend to focus on streamlining the cross-company
processes from an extended perspective of supply chain. The
actual economic context forces the enterprises to collaborate
together to survive against an increasingly aggressive
competition. In the current strong competitive industrial
context, enterprises must react quickly to the market changes.
In order to face this problem, enterprises must collaborate
together. According to Barratt (2004) and Simatupang and
Sridharan (2002), horizontal, vertical and lateral integration
are the forms of supply chain collaboration strategies.
Horizontal integration occurs when two or more unrelated or
competing organizations (at the same level of the supply
chain) producing similar products or different components of
one product, form a cooperative association to share
resources such as warehouse space and manufacturing
capacity Horizontal integration may overcome financial
barriers to trade (Manning and Baines, 2004). Vertical
integration takes place at different levels of the supply chain.
The integration between producer and the distributor enables
better physical and information flows, improvements in the
trade-off between level of service and average stock, more
economical inventory management control and better
transportation systems (Caputo and Mininno, 1996). Lateral
collaboration combines the benefits and sharing capabilities
of both vertical and horizontal integration. Integrated
logistics and inter-modal transport are examples of an
application of lateral integration that aims at synchronizing
carriers and shippers of multi firms in a seamless effective
freight transport network (Simatupang and Sridharan, 2002).
In the present paper, the impact of the horizontal
collaboration in the flexible supply chains has been studied.
The flexible supply chains and horizontal collaboration
between them has been modeled by using ARENA 7.0, a
simulation package. The novelty of the paper is that it
proposes the new paradigm of horizontal collaboration with
flexible supply chain. To show the impact, a numeric
example has also been solved where two FScs have been
considered with different inventory policies (s, S and s, Q)
and distributor node has been deemed for collaboration of
those supply chains. The total cost of supply chain is taken as
the performance measurement. In this study, the total cost of
a supply chain includes the ordering cost, inventory cost, and
back order cost of all the nodes of flexible supply chain.
The remaining of the paper has been organized in the
following manner: section 2 provides the literature review of
collaboration in supply chain whereas section 3 states the
problem. Section 4 describes the conceptual model of
horizontally collaborative flexible supply chain. Section 5
presents the numerical analysis whereas the paper will be
concluded in section 6.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Flexibility is an important factor in manufacturing and supply
chains. Stecke and Solberg, (1981) have carried out a
simulation study for a dedicated type of flexible system
examining loading strategies and dispatching rule for
manufacturing. In the literature, there are some studies
addressed to evaluate the effect of flexibility configurations
on SC
s
planning performance, such as lost sales (e.g., Albino
et al., 2002). In this paper, like other simulation studies
focused on the flexibility of a multi-node supply chain (e.g.,
Garavelli, 2003), SC
s
total cost has been investigated.
An inter-organizational relationship in which the
participating parties agree to invest resources, mutually
achieve goals, share information, (Ring and Van de Ven,
1994; Gray and Hay, 1986; Stank et al., 1999; Barrat and
Oliveira, 2001) resources, rewards (Phillips et al., 2006) and
responsibilities as well as jointly make decisions and solve
problems can be depicted as collaboration. Collaboration is
based on mutual trust, openness, shared risk and shared
rewards that yield a competitive advantage, for better
performance (Horvath, 2001).
Collaboration is for sharing the costs of large investments,
pooling and spreading of risk, and access to complementary
resources (Swink., 2006). Similarly, firms establish close,
long-term working relationships with suppliers and customers
who depend on one another for much of their business,
developing interactive relationships with partners who share
information freely, work together when trying to solve
common problems when designing new products, who jointly
plan for the future, and who make their success inter-
dependent (Spekman et al., 1998). More and more companies
are collaborating in the supply chain because of market
diversity, competitive pricing and shorter product life cycles.
Malhotra et al. (2005) maintain that supply chain partners are
engaging in interlinked processes that enable rich information
sharing and building information technology infrastructures
that allow the processing of information obtained from their
partners to create new knowledge. Their study showed how
various inter-organizational relationships contributed to
knowledge creation capabilities in firms (Malhotra et al.,
2005). Similarly, Boomer (2001) also argues that the benefits
of collaboration include revenue enhancements, cost
reductions and increased operational flexibility to cope with
high demand uncertainties. Both practitioners and academics
are increasingly interested in supply chain collaboration
(Horvath, 2001).
Collaboration implies working more closely with a shared
vision and trust (Lee and Billington, 1992). Furthermore,
sharing information, joint planning, joint problem solving
and joint decision-making are some of the components of
collaboration discussed in the literature. Soonhong et al.
(2005) revealed that sharing periodical information either
formally or informally is regarded as the essential ingredient
for collaborative partners to ease the flow of products,
services and feedback from customers.
In the light of abovementioned literature review, it can be
said that the collaboration is very important for the global
competitive edge. From the prominent review of literature, it
can be clearly seem that a lot of researchers have worked on
vertical collaboration in supply chain but there are very few
Journal of Studies on Manufacturing (Vol.1-2010/Iss.1)
Prakash and Deshmukh / Horizontal Collaboration in Flexible Supply Chains … / pp. 54-58
55
researchers who have studied the vertical collaboration in
flexible supply chain. Thus the paper presents a novel study
of horizontal collaborative flexible supply chain. The next
section depicts the conceptual model of FSCs (works on
different inventory policy) in collaboration.
3. CONCEPTUAL MODEL
The simple concept of supply chain collaboration is that the
firms are getting closer to each other. It also means that the
borders become less distinct. In the present study, two
simulation models of Four-stage multi-node FSC network for
a single product using different inventory policy management
has been taken in to the account. The manufacturer gets raw
materials from outside suppliers. The demand (µ=100, σ=15)
comes from customer/market, which follows a Normal
distribution, at the retailer nodes. The retailer carries
inventory (I=1000) and replenishes the stock from the
distributors according to a (s, S) and (s,Q) inventory control
policy; when inventory position at the retailer reaches s, an
order is placed. The order size equals the difference between
the inventory capacity S and the actual inventory level. The
excess demand is assumed as backordered at the retailer.
When the retailer places an order, the distributor satisfies the
full order immediately upon availability. Delayed retailer
orders are satisfied on a first-come, first-served basis. (Fig.1)
Fig. 1. Working concept of Supply Chain Network
Both FSCs have partial collaboration by collaborating the
distributor node evaluate the impact of horizontal
collaboration on collaborative supply chain network (Fig. 2).
Figure shows the horizontal collaboration in simple supply
chain. Here, both chain members agree to ensure timely,
accurate, and relevant data for the effectiveness of
information sharing. In this study, the shared information
includes items such as inventory levels, lead time and cost.
Fig. 2. Partial Collaborative conceptual Supply Chain Model
(Distributor Node)
4. COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS
From the perspectives of all the researches, it can be
concluded that the collaborative supply chain is evaluated on
some performance measures like reducing the supply chain
cost, adopting total quality management, closer links between
demand/supply (reducing backorder cost). In the present
study, the collaborative supply chain is evaluated on the basis
of reducing the supply chain cost as well as reducing
backorder with trade off between inventory holding cost and
backorder cost.
In this collaborative FSC, the distributor will make its
inventory decisions by considering the manufacturer’s
inventory decisions to estimate the backorder cost when
backordered. Accordingly, this section presents some
interesting results obtained from a series of studies carried
out in this direction.
Fig. 3. The variation of Total Inventory Holding Cost vs.
Distributor Inventory level
Fig. 4. The variation of Total Backorder Cost vs. Distributor
Inventory level
Journal of Studies on Manufacturing (Vol.1-2010/Iss.1)
Prakash and Deshmukh / Horizontal Collaboration in Flexible Supply Chains … / pp. 54-58
56
In this study, first the impact of horizontal collaboration has
been shown on the inventory holding cost of two FSCs with
different inventory policies. Fig 3 shows the plot between
total inventory holding cost and distributor inventory levels
with varying reorder point quantity of distributor as the
collaborative node. From this curve it is observed that if the
maximum inventory level fixed and varying the reorder point,
inventory holding cost for both the supply chain increases but
the total inventory cost of collaborative supply chain is less
then the sum of total inventory cost of both the FSCs.
In fig. 4, the graph shows the impact of backorder cost and
according to this graph it is experienced that backorder cost
for both the supply chain decreases. In case of collaboration,
total backorder cost of collaborative supply chain is less then
the sum of total backorder cost of both the supply chain.
To show the impact of collaboration on another component of
total cost of supply chain (ordering cost), a graph has been
plotted between total ordering cost and distributor inventory
levels (Fig. 5). This graph illustrates that ordering cost for
both the supply chain is increases as increases in reorder
quantity. There is also one important observation is that there
is not much difference between the total ordering cost of
collaborative supply chain and the sum of total ordering cost
of both the supply chain.
Fig. 5. The variation of Total Ordering Cost vs. Distributor
Inventory level
Fig. 6. The variation of Total supply chain Cost vs.
Distributor Inventory level
From the graph below it is observed that total cost for both
the supply chain increases as increases in reorder quantity
(fig. 6). In case of collaboration, there is slightly difference
between the total cost of collaborative supply chain and the
sum of total cost of both the supply chain.
5. CONCLUSION
This research addresses the approach to evaluate the
horizontal collaboration of two FSCs by focusing on
inventory decisions between all players of the four-echelon
supply chain. For real time decision making in supply chain
management, simulations are carried out to measure the total
cost of supply chain before and after applying the
collaboration. Supply chain collaboration plays a crucial role
in improving overall performance that benefits all the chain
members. The horizontal collaboration can reduce the overall
cost of the supply chains and the enterprises can improve the
real time decision making process by adopting the suitable
inventory policy. This study also shows that in the
collaboration there is not always the win-win situation
therefore the cost of one chain can be more than the other.
Thus, to achieve the win-win situation under these condition
collaborative partners must share their profit across the
supply chain and some intangible aspects such as trust, senior
management commitment, trust, flexibility, teamwork,
patience should also be taken into the account.
REFERENCES
Albino, V., Garavelli, A.C., Giannoecaro, I. (2002). Process
and logistic flexibility for the supply chain management.
Proceedings of the seventh inter. Symposium on Logistic:
an fifth Inter. Sympo. On Operation Strategy,
Melbourne, Australia, 14-17, July.
Barrat, M.A. and Oliveira, A. (2001). Exploring the
experiences of collaborative planning: the enablers and
inhibitors. International Journal of Physical Distribution
& Logistics Management, 31 (2), 266-89.
Barratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of
collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain
Management, 9, 30-42.
Bommer, M., O’Neil, B. and Treat, S. (2001). Strategic
assessment of the supply chain interface: a beverage
industry case study. International Journal of Physical
Distribution & Logistics Management, 31 (1), 11-25.
Caputo, J., Mininno, M., (1996). Internal, vertical and
horizontal logistics integration in Italian grocery
distribution. International Journal of Physical
Distribution & Logistics Management, 26, 64-90.
Garavelli, A.C. (2003). Flexibility configuration for the
supply chain management. International Journal
Production Economics, 85, 141-153
Gray, B. and Hay, T.M. (1986). Political limits to inter-
organizational consensus and change. The Journal of
Applied Behavioral Science, 22 (2), 95-112.
Horvath, L. (2001). Collaboration: key to value creation in
supply chain management. International Journal of
Supply Chain Management, 6 (5), 205-217.
Journal of Logistics Management, 16 (2), 237-56.
Journal of Studies on Manufacturing (Vol.1-2010/Iss.1)
Prakash and Deshmukh / Horizontal Collaboration in Flexible Supply Chains … / pp. 54-58
57
Lee, H. and Billington, C. (1992). Managing supply chain
inventories: pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan
Management Review, 33 (3), 65-73.
Malhotra, A., Gosain, S. and ElSawy, O.A. (2005).
Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains:
gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation.
MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 145-87.
Manning, L. and Baines, R.N. (2004). Globalisation: a study
of the poultry-meat supply chain. British Food Journal,
106 (10/11), 819-36.
Phillips, W., Lamming, R., Bessant, J. and Noke, H. (2006).
Discontinuous innovation and supply relationships:
strategic dalliances. R&D Management, 36 (4), 451-61.
Ring, P.S. and Van de Ven, A.H. (1994). Developmental
processes of cooperative inter-organizational
relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19 (1),
90-118
Ring, P.S. and Van den Ven, A.H. (1992). Structuring
cooperative relationships between organizations,
Strategic Management Journal, 13 (7), 483-98
Simatupang, T.M., Sridharan, R. (2002). The collaborative
supply chain. International Journal of Logistics
Management, 13, 15-30
Soonhong, M., Roath, A.S., Daugherty, P.J., Genchev, S.E.,
Chen, H., Arndt, A.D. and Richey, R.G. (2005). Supply
chain collaboration: what’s happening? The
International
Spekman, R.E., Kamauff, J.W. Jr and Myhr, N. (1998). An
empirical investigation into supply chain management: a
perspective on partnerships. International Journal of
Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 3 (2),
53-67.
Stank, T.P., Daugherty, P.J. and Autry, C.W. (1999).
Collaborative planning: supporting automatic
replenishment programmes. Supply Chain Management,
4 (2), 75-90.
Stecke, K.E., Solberg, J.J. (1981). Loading and control
policies for a flexible manufacturing systems.
International Journal of Production Research, 19(5),
481-490
Swink, M. (2006). Building collaborative innovation
capability, Research Technology Management, 49 (2),
37-48.
AUTHORS PROFILE
Mr Anuj Prakash is a young researcher who is pursuing Ph.D. from IIT,
Delhi. He is working in the domain of FMS, CIM, supply chain
management, Operation Management, Optimization. His research involves
GA, SA, AIS, and Fuzzy Systems applications to the flexible system
problems. He has some good publications in some internationals journals
and conferences.
Prof. S.G. Deshmukh is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering
Department at Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Delhi. His papers have
been published in many reputable international journals like International
Journal of Operations & Production Management, International Journal of
Productivity and Performance Management, Production Planning and
Control, International Journal of Production Research, etc.
Journal of Studies on Manufacturing (Vol.1-2010/Iss.1)
Prakash and Deshmukh / Horizontal Collaboration in Flexible Supply Chains … / pp. 54-58
58
... Marketing and sales events [18] C04 Complementary assets [18,24] C05 Process performance [18,25,26] C06 Problem solving and support [18] C07 Paperwork and administrative process support [18] C08 Production flexibility [21,24,26,27,28,29,30,31] C09 Focus strategy in limited resources [32] C10 Information sharing [9,11,19,23,25,28,29,31,33,34,35,36] C11 Trust [11,19,21,22,28,29,30,31,34 C30 Joint purchases [38] a technique that incorporates the acquired knowledge from the literature review and the AHP decision; and (3) CODAS, a combinative technique that uses two sets of distance measure to determine the hierarchy from the factors evaluated, where the authors propose, the use of the Mahalanobis distance measure instead of the Taxicab distance for the secondary measure set. E33 Transaction cost analysis [39] (continued) ...
... Marketing and sales events [18] C04 Complementary assets [18,24] C05 Process performance [18,25,26] C06 Problem solving and support [18] C07 Paperwork and administrative process support [18] C08 Production flexibility [21,24,26,27,28,29,30,31] C09 Focus strategy in limited resources [32] C10 Information sharing [9,11,19,23,25,28,29,31,33,34,35,36] C11 Trust [11,19,21,22,28,29,30,31,34 C30 Joint purchases [38] a technique that incorporates the acquired knowledge from the literature review and the AHP decision; and (3) CODAS, a combinative technique that uses two sets of distance measure to determine the hierarchy from the factors evaluated, where the authors propose, the use of the Mahalanobis distance measure instead of the Taxicab distance for the secondary measure set. E33 Transaction cost analysis [39] (continued) ...
... Marketing and sales events [18] C04 Complementary assets [18,24] C05 Process performance [18,25,26] C06 Problem solving and support [18] C07 Paperwork and administrative process support [18] C08 Production flexibility [21,24,26,27,28,29,30,31] C09 Focus strategy in limited resources [32] C10 Information sharing [9,11,19,23,25,28,29,31,33,34,35,36] C11 Trust [11,19,21,22,28,29,30,31,34 C30 Joint purchases [38] a technique that incorporates the acquired knowledge from the literature review and the AHP decision; and (3) CODAS, a combinative technique that uses two sets of distance measure to determine the hierarchy from the factors evaluated, where the authors propose, the use of the Mahalanobis distance measure instead of the Taxicab distance for the secondary measure set. E33 Transaction cost analysis [39] (continued) ...
Chapter
Sustainable manufacturing 4.0 brings a new perspective in disruptive business models. As one of the three dimensions of Industry 4.0, horizontal collaboration integrates within I4.0 value creation network. In order to cope with this challenge, horizontal collaboration displays a variety of factors for enterprises to create or develop joint projects such as knowledge transfer, new product and process development, cyber-physical shared resources. Hence, this study presents a horizontal collaboration business model for value creation as part of a sustainable manufacturing 4.0 environment. For this to be achieved, horizontal collaboration variables must be presented within a business model structure. This development is based as of three business model components (1) content, (2) structure, and (3) governance; from which horizontal collaboration variables have been grouped. This document presents a CODAS-HTFLS-Mahalanobis approach to identify horizontal collaboration top variables grouped within the business model components, thus creating a value creation network.KeywordsHorizontal CollaborationValue creation networkMCDM methodsMahalanobis distanceBusiness Model
... 1 Inventory reduction and efficient inventory management (Prakash et. Al., 2010) 2 Cost reduction (Prakash et. Al., 2010) 3 ...
... 1 Inventory reduction and efficient inventory management (Prakash et. Al., 2010) 2 Cost reduction (Prakash et. Al., 2010) 3 ...
Thesis
Full-text available
Collaboration among consumer good’s manufacturer and retailers is vital in order to elevate their performance. Such mutual cooperation’s, focusing beyond day to day business and transforming from a contract-based relationship to a value-based relationship is well received in the industries. Further coupling of information sharing with the collaboration is valued as an effective forward step. The advent of technologies naturally supports information sharing across the supply chain. Satisfying consumers demand is the main goal of any supply chain, so studying supply chain behaviour with demand as a shared information, makes it more beneficial. This thesis analyses demand information sharing in a two-stage supply chain. Three different collaboration scenarios (None, Partial and Full) are simulated using Discrete Event Simulation and their impact on supply chain costs analyzed. Arena software is used to simulate the inventory control scenarios. The test simulation results show that the total system costs decrease with the increase in the level of information sharing. There is 7% cost improvement when the information is partially shared and 43% improvement when the information is fully shared in comparison with the no information sharing scenario. The proposed work can assist decision makers in design and planning of information sharing scenarios between various supply chain partners to gain competitive advantage.
... Especially for SMEs that do not want to miss the opportunity for supply chain finance benefits, despite the complexity of the models, this solution consists of formally built network collaboration by entrepreneurial ventures to start implementing their innovative project. In particular, horizontal collaborations, including coopetition, can reduce the overall cost of supply chains (Massari and Giannoccaro, 2021), and businesses can improve their real-time decision-making process by adopting a suitable inventory policy (Prakash and Deshmukh, 2010). However, collaborative networking is still a challenge for SMEs that aim to develop their supply chains toward complex adaptive systems (Hearnshaw and Wilson, 2013). ...
Article
Purpose The present paper aims at understanding how horizontal network collaborations between small and medium enterprises (SMEs) can be designed and implemented to take advantage of a supply chain finance (SCF) perspective. Design/methodology/approach This study presents an SCF literature background identifying four literature gaps, and in response to them it adopts an action research approach. The empirical analysis is developed on a network-case study: a horizontal collaboration project between small businesses of the Italian wine industry and their supply chains. Findings SMEs can play an active role in developing – in terms of design and implementation – their collaborative networks by taking advantage of an SCF perspective for themselves, and their customers, based on the reorganization of relationships interface processes. Taking this perspective can be a concrete and crucial way to sustain the development of SMEs and their supply chains in an actual competitive context. Research limitations/implications The paper identifies the theoretical gaps in the literature, suggests new research areas that deserve to be more deeply investigated and connects case-related results to the key concepts. The empirical part presents a real case application that proposes a complete roadmap for managers and practitioners who wish to experience similar projects. Practical implications This network-case study storyline, presenting an overview of ten years of meetings, with related purposes, is suggesting a roadmap for design and implementation of horizontal network as managerial implications. These kinds of active research projects, with a collaborative mixed team of academics and practitioners, and involving a multilayer group of participants, are positive examples for closing the bridge between companies and academia, which enhance this network of small businesses active in trying to improve their competitiveness working together. Originality/value The value of the paper is to embrace a supply chain-oriented perspective for an SME, independent of the financial system and based on inventory flow management. Very little literature focuses on inventory-based research within the SCF framework, designed for real implementation in horizontal network collaboration by entrepreneurial ventures.
... They have developed a framework for valuing information that could help in taking decisions about what information to share in a collaborative venture to make both of their supply chain successful. Whereas, Deshmukh et al. (2014) have addressed the approach to evaluate the horizontal collaboration of two flexible supply chains by focusing on inventory decisions between all players of the supply chain. According to their research findings it was clear that horizontal collaboration can reduce the overall cost of the supply chains. ...
Conference Paper
Collaboration in supply chain is widely recognized as one of the core challenges for the next future. In this context, horizontal collaboration is believed to be one of the innovative solutions to tackle the growing logistic challenges from both, environmental and economic points of view. In this paper, a close look has been taken on the horizontal collaboration opportunities across industry sectors of Bangladesh to reduce traffic burden, capture more opportunities and make their supply chain more efficient. Horizontal collaboration is characterized by the sharing of information, knowledge, risk and profits among industries working in the same level of supply chain. The aim of this paper is to discuss possible horizontal collaboration opportunities in supply chain between Bangladeshi industries to impose an impact on the reduction of traffic burden. Further, a new comprehensive model named "Smart Conveyance" has been proposed which will not only allow the companies to improve their efficiency but also will play a significant role in reducing traffic congestion.
... In business to business collaboration, there has been done many studies of collaboration in supply chains (see e.g. Prakash and Deshmukh, 2010;Bratt, 2004), but this matter is important also to other types of business relationships. Agarwal and Selen (2006, p. 432) are encouraging that not only product, but also service organization managers should acknowledge potential of capabilities that can be gained from partnership, since it can lead to gained strategic and operational benefits. ...
Article
A robust knowledge-sharing network is designed for horizontal integration under disruption risks and epistemic uncertainties by introducing a novel optimization model using fuzzy robust possibilistic programming approach to optimize knowledge sharing among supply chain members with varying knowledge levels. This paper aims to identify an efficient knowledge-sharing network, thereby reducing costs and enhancing suppliers' knowledge levels. By challenging the common assumption that companies with higher knowledge levels are always the primary contributors and have more added value for cooperation, this study highlights their potential inefficiencies and higher sharing costs. The proposed model promotes the integration of diverse knowledge sources within the supply chain, emphasizing the importance of horizontal integration. It advocates for comprehensive knowledge sharing among suppliers and organizations to enhance supply chain efficiency, collaboration, and performance while reducing costs. Quantitative analysis demonstrates that knowledge sharing significantly increases supply chain integration, and the study endorses the use of multi-objective mathematical programming for optimal decision-making in scheduling. The results emphasize the value of collaborating with closely aligned companies to minimize knowledge-sharing costs and enhance broader organizational collaboration. Furthermore, the introduced model proposes practical execution scheduling and knowledge-sharing processes, as evidenced by a case study, leading to effective execution scheduling, reduced costs, improved communication, strengthened collaboration, and increased supply chain efficiency. Overall, this article contributes to research in supply chain management and knowledge sharing models, enabling them to navigate constraints and market dynamics to improve supply chain performance through effective knowledge sharing and collaboration.
Book
This book gives an overview of the latest technologies in the Industry 4.0, using smart and autonomous systems driven by data and machine learning, to develop a sustainable approach to manufacturing. It includes the implementation of smart technological approaches in different manufacturing processes such as laser welding, additive manufacturing, equipment maintenance and inspection, automotive manufacturing, poultry processing, supply chain management, value stream mapping and development. This book caters to research experts and practitioners who are keen to realize the benefits of industry 4.0 to transform the manufacturing sector into a more sustainable-based state.
Chapter
Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things have revolutionized every manufacturing process, and the welding industry is far from this huge breakthrough. Big data and real-time monitoring as critical elements of the fourth industrial revolution are the essential parts of all manufacturing sectors, especially laser welding. Therefore, optimizing and controlling manufacturing processes using Industry 4.0 components, such as the Internet of Things, sensor-based monitoring, and big data analytics, are considered critical approaches toward sustainable, efficient, and defect-free manufacturing. In this regard, this chapter has argued intelligent laser welding and analyzed sustainable manufacturing challenges by using optimization approaches. It recommends possible concerted effort and reveals how laser welding and Industry 4.0 strategies can integrate, assist, and synchronize each other.
Article
This paper examines the impacts of horizontal collaboration among blood transfusion units (BTUs) in the Indonesian blood supply chain to anticipate problems such as uncertainty of supply and demand. The conceptual model developed in this study, as well as its implementation, considers the uncertainty. A discrete event simulation is used to evaluate the horizontal collaboration with three main performance indicators: the rate of blood shortages, the rate of outdated blood bags, and the total profits. Two blood transfusion units (BTUs) in Indonesia are examined as case studies in this research. Based on data from the two case studies in one year, a set of experiments, results, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the benefits of horizontal collaboration. The results show that the horizontal collaboration decreases blood shortages, outdated blood bags, and inventory costs and increases the total profits. The total revenues increased, and there was additional income from selling blood bags to partner collaboration.
Article
Full-text available
This article examines the developmental process of cooperative interorganizational relationships (IORs) that entail transaction-specific investments in deals that cannot be fully specified or controlled by the parties in advance of their execution. A process framework is introduced that focuses on formal, legal, and informal social-psychological processes by which organizational parties jointly negotiate, commit to, and execute their relationship in ways that achieve efficient and equitable outcomes and internal solutions to conflicts when they arise. The framework is elaborated with a set of propositions that explain how and why cooperative IORs emerge, evolve. and dissolve. The propositions have academic implications for enriching interorganizational relationships, transaction cost economics. agency theories, and practical implications for managing the relationship journey.
Article
Full-text available
Automatic replenishment systems that restock inventory based on actual demand triggers rather than relying on long-range forecasts and layers of safety stock have been implemented in a great number of firms in recent years. Now these same firms are taking supply chain cooperation to another level through involvement in collaborative planning/forecasting/replenishment (CPFR). The results of a recent survey assessing current levels of involvement in cross-organizational collaboration among firms utilizing automatic inventory replenishment are presented. The results provide strong support for positive associations between high levels of CPFR and implementation of operating process change and information system capabilities. Results supported only a very weak association between CPFR and effectiveness in achieving operational performance goals.
Article
Full-text available
Despite its infancy, some authors are already suggesting that the writing may be on the wall for supply chain collaboration. It has been reported that supply chain collaboration has proved difficult to implement; there has been an over-reliance on technology in trying to implement it; a failure to understand when and with whom to collaborate; and fundamentally a lack of trust between trading partners. This paper proposes that a supply chain segmentation approach, based on customer buying behaviour and service needs, is the most appropriate context for collaboration. The paper also proposes the need for a greater understanding of the elements that make up supply chain collaboration, and in particular how the relevant cultural, strategic and implementation elements inter-relate with each other.
Article
Full-text available
Notes that logistics costs in the grocery sector, in Italy, are about 25,000 billion lire and that in order to reduce these costs logistics integration has to be improved between institutions of the distribution channel. Focuses on two of the main institutions of the grocery distribution channel: branded product industry and large-scale trade. Referring to these institutions and to the logistics functions they carry out, analyses integration areas in order to identify some organizational and managerial solutions for improving interfunctional and interorganizational co-ordination. In particular, divides these solutions into three main groups according to the level of integration they refer to: internal integration (inside each business), vertical integration (between businesses located at different stages of the channel) and horizontal integration (between different businesses located on the same level of the channel). Internal and horizontal integration are the prerequisites for achieving vertical integration and consequently for achieving synergies between the institutions involved.
Article
When efforts at collaborative problem solving take place in interorganizational settings, political issues arise with respect to the distribution ofpower among various organizations with a stake in the matters being considered. This article discusses the efforts of the National Coal Policy Project (NCPP), a collaborative change effort by representatives of environmental groups andfirms mining and using coal, to achieve a consensus on national coal policy in a nonadversarial, nontraditional setting. The authors 'study of the NCPPexplores three political issues: the role of power in the selection of participants in the NCPP negotiations, the role of power in each stakeholder's decision as to whether or not to participate in the project, and the power of the NCPP participants to have the project recommendations implemented. The authors conclude that successful implementation depends upon the perceived legitimacy of the project and those selecting its participants, and on the ability to include all key stakeholders. This study has implicationsfor planned change in both interorganizational and intraorganizational settings.
Article
Supply chain integration (or synchronisation) is to a large extent still only a promise, despite many considerable efforts by organisations and their customers and suppliers. Lack of visibility of true consumer demand and collaborative relationships based upon joint decision making remain significant barriers to the goal of supply chain integration. Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR) is a strategy which promises to overcome these barriers, and seeks through joint planning, joint decision making and the development of a clearer understanding of the dynamics of the supply chain replenishment process to deliver some of the promised benefits of actual supply chain integration. Despite the existence of a detailed and comprehensive process model, and promising initial results there has not been widespread adoption of CPFR, justifying the need to revisit the process model and to further explore the inhibitors and enablers. Based upon a review of the existing literature and a comprehensive survey of participants in existing CPFR implementations, this paper identifies the critical inhibitors and makes some proposals as to how these inhibitors may be overcome.
Article
As global markets grow increasingly efficient, competition no longer takes place between individual businesses, but between entire value chains. Collaboration through intelligent e-business networks will provide the competitive edge that enables all the participants in a value chain to prevail and grow. Collaboration requires individual participants to adopt simplified, standardized solutions based on common architectures and data models. Time to market is critical, and participants will have to forego the luxuries of customization and modification that characterized the proprietary infrastructures of the past.
Article
Increasing globalisation of the poultry-meat supply chain has led to consolidation and evolution of transnational companies, whether by vertical or horizontal integration, and the development of business clusters. There are significant benefits in these economies of scale, especially improved purchasing power and greater intellectual, technological and production resources for organizations to draw upon to provide products that meet differentiated customer needs. The consumer has seen the benefit of globalisation in lower commodity food prices, wider product choice and the advent of “convenience” food. Seeks to review the key factors that have led to the globalisation of the poultry supply chain and the impact of these changes. The poultry supply chain was chosen because it is highly integrated and the research includes a literature review and an evaluation to determine how it specifically relates to the poultry supply chain. Identifies the factors that affect current and future developments in food globalisation, including: relative strength of currencies; speed of technology transfer to developing countries; tax and regulatory burden in nation states or trading groups; cost of capital and labour and its effect on competitiveness; continuing production specialization and greater differentiation between domestic and international meat trade; and concerns over production methods, food safety and hygiene standards. Analyses the impact of globalisation of the food supply chain to all sectors and will be of interest to academics and those working in food supply.
Article
Competition in the beverage industry is increasing on all fronts (advertising, price, product proliferation, service, etc.). As a result, distributors need to understand what is important to retailers and assess how they and their competitors are meeting those needs in the supply chain. In this paper a performance system is proposed to assess the distributor-retailer interface based on the integration of a number of concepts including customer service, relationship exchanges, competitive benchmarking, order winners (consumer preference perceptions), and portfolio analysis.Various performance matrices are constructed which indicate the importance level and service effectiveness for categories of service provided to retailers. These importance/ performance matrices provide a basis for distributors to develop marketing strategies for categories of retailers, as well as for individual retailers.