ArticlePDF Available

Restitution of mass-size residuals: Validating body condition indices

Wiley
Ecology
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Body condition can have important fitness consequences, but measuring body condition of live animals from wild populations has been the subject of much recent debate. Using the residuals from a regression of body mass on a linear measure of body size is one of the most common methods of measuring condition and has been used in many vertebrate taxa. Recently, the use of this method has been criticized because assumptions are likely violated. We tested several assumptions regarding the use of this method with body composition and morphometric data from five species of small mammals and with statistical simulations. We tested the assumptions that the relationship between body mass and body size is linear, and that the proportion of mass associated with energy reserves is independent of body size. In addition, we tested whether the residuals from reduced major axis (RMA) regression or major axis (MA) regression performed better than the residuals from ordinary least squares (OLS) regression as indices of body condition. We found no evidence of nonlinear relationships between body mass and body size. Relative energy reserves (fat and lean dry mass) were generally independent or weakly dependent on body size. Residuals from MA and RMA regression consistently explained less variation in body composition than OLS regression. Using statistical simulations, we compared the effects of violations of the assumption that true condition and residual indices are independent of body size on the OLS, MA, and RMA procedures and found that OLS performed better than the RMA and MA procedures. Despite recent criticisms of residuals from mass–size OLS regressions, these indices of body condition appear to satisfy critical assumptions. Although some caution is warranted when using residuals, especially when both inter-individual variation in body size and measurement error are high, we found no reason to reject OLS residuals as legitimate indices of body condition.
Content may be subject to copyright.
155
Ecology,
86(1), 2005, pp. 155–163
q
2005 by the Ecological Society of America
RESTITUTION OF MASS–SIZE RESIDUALS: VALIDATING BODY
CONDITION INDICES
A
LBRECHT
I. S
CHULTE
-H
OSTEDDE
,
1,5
B
ERTRAM
Z
INNER
,
2
J
OHN
S. M
ILLAR
,
3
AND
G
RAHAM
J. H
ICKLING
4
1
Department of Biology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2C6 Canada
2
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849 USA
3
Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7 Canada
4
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, Lansing, Michigan 48824 USA
Abstract.
Body condition can have important fitness consequences, but measuring body
condition of live animals from wild populations has been the subject of much recent debate.
Using the residuals from a regression of body mass on a linear measure of body size is
one of the most common methods of measuring condition and has been used in many
vertebrate taxa. Recently, the use of this method has been criticized because assumptions
are likely violated. We tested several assumptions regarding the use of this method with
body composition and morphometric data from five species of small mammals and with
statistical simulations. We tested the assumptions that the relationship between body mass
and body size is linear, and that the proportion of mass associated with energy reserves is
independent of body size. In addition, we tested whether the residuals from reduced major
axis (RMA) regression or major axis (MA) regression performed better than the residuals
from ordinary least squares (OLS) regression as indices of body condition. We found no
evidence of nonlinear relationships between body mass and body size. Relative energy
reserves (fat and lean dry mass) were generally independent or weakly dependent on body
size. Residuals from MA and RMA regression consistently explained less variation in body
composition than OLS regression. Using statistical simulations, we compared the effects
of violations of the assumption that true condition and residual indices are independent of
body size on the OLS, MA, and RMA procedures and found that OLS performed better
than the RMA and MA procedures. Despite recent criticisms of residuals from mass–size
OLS regressions, these indices of body condition appear to satisfy critical assumptions.
Although some caution is warranted when using residuals, especially when both inter-
individual variation in body size and measurement error are high, we found no reason to
reject OLS residuals as legitimate indices of body condition.
Key words: body condition; body mass; body size;
Clethrionomys gapperi;
fat;
Microtus penn-
sylvanicus; Neotoma cinerea; Peromyscus maniculatus;
reduced major axis; regression analysis; re-
siduals;
Tamias amoenus
.
I
NTRODUCTION
The body condition of an animal refers to its ener-
getic state. An animal in good condition is assumed to
have more energy reserves than an animal in poor con-
dition. For instance, individuals with larger energy re-
serves may have better fasting endurance and higher
survival than individuals with smaller reserves (Millar
and Hickling 1990). Other fitness parameters related to
reproduction and survival have been found to correlate
with body condition among many taxa (e.g., Dobson
1992, Dobson and Michener 1995, Wauters and Dhondt
1995, Bachman and Widemo 1999, Shine et al. 2001).
Measuring the body condition of live animals has
been the subject of much recent debate (Jakob et al.
1996, Kotiaho 1999, Green 2001, Hayes and Shonk-
wiler 2001, Schulte-Hostedde et al. 2001, Speakman
2001). However, the common objective has been to
Manuscript received 29 January 2004; revised 4 June 2004;
accepted 22 June 2004. Corresponding Editor: F. S. Dobson.
5
E-mail: aschultehostedde@laurentian.ca
determine the mass of an individual relative to its body
size. An animal can be heavy because it is structurally
large or because it is carrying metabolizable tissue such
as fat and protein (Dobson 1992). Indices of body con-
dition attempt to determine the mass of the individual
associated with energy reserves after correcting for
structural body size. One of the most common methods
used to measure condition involves regressing body
mass on some linear index of body size, and using the
residuals from this regression (typically ordinary least
squares [OLS] regression) as an index of body con-
dition. An individual with a positive residual is con-
sidered to be in better condition than an individual with
a negative residual (Jakob et al. 1996, Schulte-Hosted-
de et al. 2001).
Recently, Green (2001) reviewed the use of residual
indices of condition in ecological studies and identified
six key assumptions underlying this methodology that
are likely to be violated in some or all studies. These
assumptions fall into three categories. The first two are
related to the initial regression between body mass and
156
ALBRECHT I. SCHULTE-HOSTEDDE ET AL.
Ecology, Vol. 86, No. 1
P
LATE
1. Yellow-pine chipmunk (
Tamais amoenus
). Pho-
to credit: J. S. Millar.
body size. These assumptions are (1) that mass in-
creases linearly with body size (or the body size in-
dicator [BSI]), and (2) that the residual index of con-
dition and true condition (the proportion of mass as-
sociated with energy reserves) of an animal are inde-
pendent of body size (or BSI). Assumptions 3 and 4
are related to the index of body size: (3) that the index
of body size (BSI) is an accurate measure of overall
structural size, and (4) that there is no correlation be-
tween the BSI relative to other structural components
and the parameter against which the residual index of
condition is analyzed. The final assumptions are related
to the use of OLS regression in determining residual
indices of condition. Ordinary least squares (OLS) re-
gression assumes (5) that Xis strictly independent of
Y(i.e., that Xand Yare not mutually interdependent),
and (6) that there is no ‘‘error’’ in X(i.e., the scatter
in points around a slope is due to variation in Y, not
X). Green (2001) concluded that many of these as-
sumptions are likely violated in some or all studies,
and suggested that alternative regression models such
as model II regression or nonparametric methods
should be used to calculate residual indices of condi-
tion.
Because of the extensive use of residuals as indices
of condition (e.g., mammals: Dobson et al. 1999, Fisher
1999; birds: Schluter and Gustafsson 1993, Weather-
head et al. 1999, Merila¨ et al. 2001; amphibians: Judge
and Brooks 2001; reptiles: Weatherhead et al. 1995,
Shine et al. 2001), it is critical that assumptions and
criticisms of this statistical technique be empirically
tested with appropriate data. Recently, we attempted
to determine whether the residual index of condition
(as calculated from OLS regression between body mass
and body size) was correlated with actual measure-
ments of body fat in five species of small mammals
(Schulte-Hostedde et al. 2001). Residual indices were
weakly correlated with fat, and more closely correlated
with lean dry mass (composed mostly of muscle pro-
tein) and water. Here, we reexamine these data to de-
termine whether Green’s (2001) concerns regarding the
use of residuals from ordinary least squares regression
are valid, and whether the assumptions which Green
(2001) outlined are likely to be violated in field studies.
For each of five species of small mammals, we first
assessed linearity between body mass and body size.
We then determined whether the portion of body mass
composed of energy reserves (body fat and lean dry
mass, which is predominantly composed of protein)
was independent of body size. Our major goal was to
determine which regression model produced residuals
that best predicted energy reserves. We used residuals
from OLS regression between a multivariate index of
body size (derived from a principal-components anal-
ysis) and body mass. It has been suggested that using
multiple regression to determine the direct relationship
between condition and an independent variable is a
preferred alternative to the use of residuals (Hayes and
Shonkwiler 2001). Thus we conducted a multiple re-
gression between body size and body mass, and com-
ponents of body mass (fat, lean dry mass, and water).
We interpreted the partial correlation coefficients be-
tween body mass and body components as measures
of the relationship between ‘‘condition’’ and body com-
position. Green (2001) suggested that alternative (Mod-
el II) regression models such as reduced major axis
(RMA) regression and major axis (MA) regression
should be preferred over OLS regression, because they
assume that error occurs in Xas well as Y(where X
corresponds to the measure of body size). Ordinary
least squares (OLS) regression assumes that there is no
error in X, because Xis set by the researcher (McArdle
1988). We assessed the relationship between residuals
obtained from both MA and RMA regression and body
composition, and compared this relationship to that
found between residuals from OLS regression and body
composition. Finally, we used numerical simulations
to compare the effects of a violation of the assumption
that the residual index of condition and true condition
(the proportion of mass associated with energy re-
serves) of an animal are independent of body size (or
BSI; Green 2001) on the different regression proce-
dures (OLS, MA, RMA).
M
ETHODS
We used data from five species of small mammal
collected in the Kananaskis Valley, Alberta, Canada,
in the Front Ranges of the Rocky Mountains (51
8
N,
115
8
W): yellow-pine chipmunks (
Tamias amoenus
Al-
len; see Plate 1), bushy-tailed woodrats (
Neotoma ci-
nerea
Ord; see Appendix), deer mice (
Peromyscus
maniculatus
Wagner), red-backed voles (
Clethriono-
mys gapperi
Vigors), and meadow voles (
Microtus
pennsylvanicus
Ord). All animals used in the analyses
were either adult males or adult females, which were
not pregnant or lactating.
Chipmunks (
n
5
22) were live trapped from early
May to late August 1998 using Longworth live traps
(baited with whole oats and sunflower seeds) and eu-
January 2005 157
BODY CONDITION INDICES
thanized with an overdose of isoflourine. Body mass
(
6
0.01 g), total body length including tail (
6
1 mm),
tail length (
6
1 mm), skull length (
6
0.1 mm), and skull
width (
6
0.1 mm) were measured and each body was
frozen. Woodrats (
n
5
62) were collected in summer
and winter of 1984–1985 using Conibear kill-traps
(Hickling et al. 1991). Body mass (
6
0.1 g), total body
length including tail (
6
1 mm), tail length (
6
1 mm),
skull length (
6
0.5 mm), and hind foot length (
6
0.5
mm) were measured and each body frozen. Deer mice
(
n
5
100), red-backed voles (
n
5
86), and meadow
voles (
n
5
34) were collected from early May to late
August 1987 using snap traps baited with a small string
that had been soaked in aromatic oils and then tied to
the treadle (Millar et al. 1990). Body mass (
6
0.1 g),
total body length including tail, tail length, hind foot
length, and ear length (all
6
1 mm) were measured, and
each body was frozen (Millar 1987, Millar et al. 1990).
Fat extractions were performed following Kerr et al.
(1982) and Dobush et al. (1985). For chipmunks, deer
mice, and voles, whole bodies (excluding stomach con-
tents) were dried, ground in a Wiley mill or aMoulinex
coffee grinder, and fat content was determined using
petroleum ether in a Soxhlet fat extractor. Mass of
stomach contents was measured (
6
0.01 g). Woodrat
carcasses (excluding stomach contents [weighed sep-
arately
6
0.1 g], skull, and pelt) were ground in a meat
grinder and dried. The carcass was then ground again
in a Moulinex coffee grinder. Fat extraction was per-
formed on two 4-g subsamples. Fat content of the pelt
was determined by soaking the intact pelt in ether for
24 h. Total fat content was calculated as the mean of
the two replicate estimates of carcass fat, plus pelt fat
(Hickling et al. 1991). Fat extractions for all species
were performed in the Department of Biology, Uni-
versity of Western Ontario. For all species, we calcu-
lated water content as the difference between fresh
mass (without stomach contents) and the mass of the
carcass after drying. Lean dry mass was determined by
the mass of the carcass following both water and fat
removal.
To measure overall structural size, we conducted a
principal-components analysis of log-transformed
body size variables for each of the five species (Iskjaer
et al. 1989, Dobson 1992). The first principal com-
ponent (PC1) was only used as an index of structural
size if all body size variables were positively correlated
with PC1 (Pimentel 1979). All variables were entered
into the analysis as measured except for total body
length and tail length. Body length was calculated by
subtracting tail length from total body length. We log-
transformed and standardized (mean of 0, standard de-
viation of 1) body mass and body size (PC1 scores) in
all analyses to remove the heteroscedastic nature of the
data and standardize all variables measured with dif-
ferent units (i.e., mass, PC scores). Residuals obtained
using untransformed body mass tended to increase with
body size (PC1).
Assessing linearity
We assessed whether the relationship between body
mass and body size (PC1 and body length) was linear
by inspecting plots of the residuals and the independent
variable (body size). If the residuals were evenly dis-
tributed across the range of body sizes, we assumed
that the relationship was linear. In addition, we con-
ducted quadratic regressions to determine whether the
addition of a second order term would improve the
proportion of variation in body mass explained by body
size. Colinearity between Xand X
2
may occur in poly-
nomial regressions, and it is appropriate to standardize
Xto a mean of 0 under these circumstances (Legendre
and Legendre 1998). In four of five species, we used
a principal-component score which had a mean of 0 as
X. For meadow voles, we standardized body length
(mean of 0, standard deviation of 1) for all individuals
for the polynomial regressions.
Testing for independence of energy reserves
from body size
To test for the independence of energy reserves from
body size, we conducted a multiple regression between
the mass of energy reserves (body fat and lean dry
mass) and both body size (PC1 or log body length) and
body mass. The partial correlation coefficient for body
size was used to determine whether energy reserves
were related to body size.
Comparing residuals
Slope and intercepts for OLS regression between
body mass and body size (PC1 or body length in the
case of meadow voles), and MA and RMA regressions
between body mass and body size (PC1 and body
length) were calculated for all five species. To calculate
RMA and MA slopes and intercepts, we used the pro-
gram ‘‘Model II regression’’ (Legendre 2001). Several
methods have been suggested for calculating residuals
as indices of condition. We used residuals (
y
-axis de-
viations) from OLS, RMA, and MA regressions as in-
dices of condition, and regressed them independently
on absolute fat (g), lean dry mass (g), and water (g).
We also used the partial correlation coefficient of mass
from a multiple regression of body components (fat,
lean dry mass, and water) on body size (PC1 or body
length) and body mass to describe the relationship be-
tween condition and body composition (Hayes and
Shonkwiler 2001). Finally, unlike OLS regression,
RMA and MA regression do not minimize the sum of
squared
y
-axis deviations, and therefore we used the
‘‘true’’ residual from these alternative regression mod-
els as indices of condition. Reduced major axis (RMA)
regression minimizes the sum of the areas of the tri-
angles defined by each data point, the point on the
regression line corresponding to the Xvalue, and the
point corresponding to the Yvalue (McArdle 1988).
Major axis (MA) regression minimizes the sum of
158
ALBRECHT I. SCHULTE-HOSTEDDE ET AL.
Ecology, Vol. 86, No. 1
squared distances perpendicular to the regression line.
Thus, the true residuals for these regression models are
the signed area of the triangle defined by each data
point and the points on the regression line correspond-
ing to the Xand Yvariables (RMA, where a triangle
above the slope is positive and a triangle below the
slope is negative), and the perpendicular distance be-
tween the data point and the regression line (MA).
Statistical simulations
We assumed an allometric relationship between the
body mass and the body size of an animal from a given
population. This relationship is an allometric equation:
b
median{body mass
z
body size}
5
a
(body size)
for some constants
a
and
b.
This equation can be trans-
formed into a linear equation by log transforming both
sides. After adding a random term to account for de-
viations from the allometric relationship, one obtains
log(body mass)
5b 1b
log(body size)
1d
01
where
b
0
and
b
1
are constants and
d
is a random variable
with median 0. The index of body condition (predicted
energy reserves) is
d
. To examine the effect of a vio-
lation of Assumption 2 (that the residual index of con-
dition and true condition [the proportion of mass as-
sociated with energy reserves] of an animal are inde-
pendent of body size [or BSI; Green 2001]), we pro-
duced data where there was no relationship between
energy reserves (
Z
) and body size (X). More specifi-
cally, we created random samples of X,Y(body mass),
and
Z
, where the random vector (X,Y) was independent
from the random variable
Z
. Then the residuals of the
regression of Yon X, calculated by OLS, MA, and
RMA regression are independent of
Z
. We randomly
introduced errors into the measurements of X,Y,
Z
,
and thereby obtained the measurements X
9
,Y
9
, and
Z
9
.
We then calculated the residuals of Y
9
with respect to
X
9
using OLS, MA, and RMA regression, and report
the number of times that the residuals and
Z
9
are found
to be significantly correlated. Because any detected
correlation is due to an error caused by a violation of
the assumption that body condition and size are in-
dependent, the method in which the detection rate is
significantly lower than the others is judged to be the
better method.
For four of the five data sets (yellow-pine chipmunk,
bushy-tailed woodrat, deer mouse, and red-backed
vole; because the index of size for the meadow vole
was univariate, this species was excluded), we ran-
domly created 10 000 new data sets, each with variables
standardized with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation
of 1. These new data sets ‘‘look like’’ the collected
data set except that there is no relationship between
the body size and true condition (mass associated with
energy reserves). To do this, we added a random
amount to each observed value of X. This random
amount is normally distributed with mean 0 and stan-
dard deviation 0.05 which corresponds roughly to 5%
error in the measurements. Instead of the measured
response
Z,
we used a random selection from all the
measured responses of
Z.
The random selection is de-
noted
Z
R
. Then (X
9
,Y) is independent of
Z
R
and in
particular there is no correlation between the residuals
of Yregressed on X
9
and the defined body condition
Z
R
.
To create a violation of the assumption that energy
reserves are independent of body size, we estimated
the parameters
b
0
and
b
1
in the linear model
Z
5b
0
1
b
1
X
using the OLS procedure and calculated 90%
confidence intervals for the intercept and slope (I and
S, respectively). These intervals were fixed for all sim-
ulated data sets. We randomly chose
b
0
I and
b
1
S using the uniform distribution and let
Z
95
Z
R
1b
0
1b
1
X.
The simulation study was performed using the sta-
tistical software R, Version 1.7.1, for Microsoft Win-
dows (
available online
).
6
The programs used are avail-
able from the authors upon request.
R
ESULTS
The descriptive statistics for body size components,
body mass, and body composition are provided in
Schulte-Hostedde et al. (2001). The first principal com-
ponent (PC1) of morphological measurements for
woodrats, chipmunks, red-backed voles, and deer mice
was used to estimate body size. PC1 explained at least
50% of the overall variation in size measurements for
these species (Table 1). All morphological measure-
ments loaded positively and higher than 0.5 on PC1
except for hind foot length of red-backed voles (0.460).
Factor loadings for meadow voles were not in a con-
sistent direction (Table 1). Therefore, to describe body
size in meadow voles we only used log-transformed
body length (as in other studies of voles; e.g., Heske
and Ostfeld 1990). We used PC1 scores appropriately
standardized for all other species.
Assessing linearity
Visual inspection of residuals suggested that log-
transformation adequately linearized the data for all
species. The addition of a quadratic term to the re-
gression equations increased
r
2
negligibly (
,
0.02), and
the quadratic term was nonsignificant (
P
.
0.26) in all
cases.
Testing for independence of energy reserves
from body size
We found several cases in which energy reserves
were not independent of body size. In both deer mice
and red-backed voles, large individuals had less fat than
small individuals after controlling for body mass. In
bushy-tailed woodrats, deer mice, and red-backed
voles, large individuals had more lean dry mass than
6
^
http://www.r-project.org/
&
January 2005 159
BODY CONDITION INDICES
T
ABLE
1. Factor loadings of morphological traits on PC1 from principal-components analysis
for five species of small mammals sampled from the Kananaskis Valley, Alberta, Canada.
Trait Woodrat Chipmunk Meadow vole Red-backed
vole Deer mouse
Variance (%)
Body length
Skull length
Skull width
Hind foot
Ear length
75.1
0.883
0.916
NA
0.803
NA
50.0
0.799
0.535
0.757
NA
NA
49.3
2
0.718
NA
NA
0.620
2
0.761
55.0
0.840
NA
NA
0.460
0.856
51.0
0.756
NA
NA
0.679
0.726
Notes.
Variance refers to the percentage of the variation in the data explained by PC1 (see
Schulte-Hostedde et al. 2001). ‘
NA
’’ denotes not applicable.
T
ABLE
2. Partial correlation coefficients from multiple regression of body size (PC1 for all species except meadow voles)
and body mass on body components (fat, lean dry mass, water) for five species of small mammals.
Component Woodrat Chipmunk Meadow vole Red-backed
vole Deer mouse
PC1
Fat
Lean dry mass
2
0.221
0.337*
2
0.023
0.175
2
0.090
0.137
2
0.234*
0.256*
2
0.293*
0.266*
Mass
Fat
Lean dry mass
Water
0.426*
0.831*
0.969*
0.362
0.796*
0.820*
0.300
0.840*
0.980*
0.326*
0.777*
0.971*
0.360*
0.394*
0.887*
Note:
Body length was used as an index of body size for meadow voles because body size components did not load in
consistent directions in a principal-components analysis.
*
P
,
0.05.
small individuals after controlling for body mass (Table
2).
Comparing residuals from alternative regression
models to body composition
As expected, standardization of the body mass and
size (PC1 scores or body length) resulted in OLS slope
estimates equal to the correlation coefficient (
r
), and
intercepts equal to 0 for all five species (Table 3). In
addition, slope and intercept estimates for both RMA
and MA regression were 1 and 0, respectively, for all
five species. All regression models (OLS, RMA, MA)
pass through the mean of the Xand Yvariable, and
with standardized data the means of both Xand Yare
0. It follows from the equations for the slope for MA
and RMA regression (see formulae 10.11, 10.12 in Le-
gendre and Legendre [1998]), that the slope is 1 when
the variance in both Xand Yare equal, as occurs when
both variables are standardized.
Generally, residuals obtained by OLS regression
were more closely correlated with body components
(fat, lean dry mass, water) than residuals (both
y
-axis
residuals and ‘‘true’’ residuals) obtained from MA and
RMA regression (Tables 4 and 5).
Y
-axis residuals and
‘‘true’’ residuals from MA and RMA were similarly
correlated with body components (Tables 4 and 5).
When the relationship between body mass (corrected
for body size) and fat, lean dry mass, and water was
assessed directly via multiple regression (Table 2), the
partial correlation coefficients between mass and body
components were generally higher than those derived
from OLS residuals and body components, especially
with respect to lean dry mass and water.
Statistical simulations
The results of the statistical simulations revealed that
the proportion of simulations in which the null hy-
pothesis (that actual energy reserves are independent
of body size) was falsely rejected was substantially
higher with RMA and MA regression when compared
with OLS regression (Table 6). Residuals from OLS
regression tended to be falsely related to energy re-
serves 4–5% of the time, whereas residuals from RMA
and MA regression tended to be falsely related to en-
ergy reserves 10–30% of the time.
D
ISCUSSION
‘‘Condition’’ is a nebulous term and authors often
do not explicitly define its use. A major, though often
unstated, assumption is that condition refers to the en-
ergetic state of an animal. An animal in ‘‘good’’ con-
dition is thought to be in positive energy balance,
whereas an animal in ‘‘poor’’ condition is in negative
energy balance (Jakob et al. 1996, Speakman 2001).
While many authors assume that animals that are heavi-
er than predicted by their body size have more metab-
olizable tissue than individuals that are lighter than
predicted by body size (e.g., Dobson 1992), it is un-
likely that this extra mass is composed strictly of fat.
Unless animals are depositing energy (fat) for a specific
160
ALBRECHT I. SCHULTE-HOSTEDDE ET AL.
Ecology, Vol. 86, No. 1
T
ABLE
3. Intercepts and slopes obtained from ordinary least squares (OLS) regression between
standardized body mass (log-transformed) and body size (PC1 and log-transformed, or stan-
dardized body length for meadow voles) for five species of small mammals.
Species Intercept Slope (
5
r
) 95%
CI
P
Woodrat
Chipmunk
Meadow vole
Red-backed vole
Deer mouse
0
0
0
0
0
0.847
0.563
0.773
0.700
0.495
6
0.137
6
0.385
6
0.228
6
0.155
6
0.174
,
0.001
0.006
,
0.001
,
0.001
,
0.001
Notes:
Body length was used as an index of body size for meadow voles because body size
components did not load in consistent directions in a principal-components analysis. The 95%
confidence intervals for the slope, which must be equal to the correlation coefficient (
r
), and
corresponding
P
values are also included.
T
ABLE
4. Correlation coefficients (
r
) between
y
-axis residuals and absolute fat, lean dry mass, and water for five species
of small mammals.
Regression and
component Woodrat Chipmunk Meadow vole Red-backed
vole Deer mouse
OLS
Fat (g)
Lean dry mass (g)
Water (g)
0.409***
0.421***
0.518***
0.353†
0.660***
0.690***
0.287†
0.554***
0.631***
0.326*
0.547***
0.701***
0.357***
0.352***
0.832***
RMA/MA
Fat (g)
Lean dry mass (g)
Water (g)
0.315*
0.166
0.264*
0.207
0.323
0.357†
0.184
0.268
0.336†
0.303*
0.229*
0.378***
0.371***
0.078
0.545***
Notes:
Residuals were obtained from the regression between body mass and body size (PC1 or body length for meadow
voles) using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, reduced major axis (RMA) regression, and majoraxis (MA) regression.
Body length was used as an index of body size for meadow voles because body size components did not load in consistent
directions in a principal-components analysis.
P
,
0.10; *
P
,
0.05; ***
P
,
0.001.
purpose (e.g., migration or hibernation), it seems likely
that variation in condition reflects variation in all con-
stituents of body composition including fat, protein,
water, and skeletal tissue. For example, residual indices
of condition reflect variation in all of these constituents
in small mammals (Schulte-Hostedde et al. 2001).
Therefore, our definition of condition does not restrict
variation in size-corrected mass to variation in fat
alone, but to all components of body composition. The
fact that condition reflects variation in all of fat, lean
dry mass, and water may explain why, in many cases,
residuals explain a moderate amount of variation in
body composition of small mammals.
Data from the five species of small mammals ex-
amined here generally fit the most critical assumptions
regarding the measurement of condition using residuals
from mass–size regressions (Green 2001). First, the
relationship between body mass and body size appeared
to be reasonably linear for all species. Nonlinear re-
lationships may be more likely when intraspecific var-
iation in body size (X) is larger than that found in small
mammals. For instance, allometric (nonlinear) rela-
tionships between body mass and body size may be
more likely in taxa with indeterminate growth, such as
reptiles and amphibians, than in taxa with determinate
growth, such as mammals and birds. Hayes and Shonk-
wiler (2001) examined bivariate plots of mass and body
size in six species: chuckwalla (
Sauromalus obesus
),
desert tortoise (
Gopherus agassizii
), trout (
Oncorhyn-
chus clarki
), mason bee (
Osmia
sp.), orange-crowned
warbler (
Vermivora celata
), and white-ankled mouse
(
Peromyscus pectoralis
). Relationships appeared to be
nonlinear when the range of body sizes was large
(
.
100%), and linear when the range of body sizes was
small (
,
25%).
Second, there was evidence of size dependence of
energy reserves among three of the five examined spe-
cies. The general pattern appears to be that larger in-
dividuals carry less fat and/or more lean dry mass than
smaller individuals. Nonetheless, the amount of vari-
ation in energy reserves explained by body size was
low (5.5–11.3%). The assumption that energy reserves
are independent of body size may occasionally be vi-
olated in natural populations, if larger individuals have
greater access to food resources.
The statistical simulations provide evidence that or-
dinary least squares (OLS) regression is preferred over
major axis (MA) and reduced major axis (RMA) re-
gressions. Residuals derived from both MA and RMA
regression of body mass (log-transformed) on body size
were far more likely to be falsely related to energy
reserves than residuals derived from OLS regression.
This result, coupled with the fact that RMA and MA
residuals consistently predicted less variation in body
January 2005 161
BODY CONDITION INDICES
T
ABLE
5. Correlation coefficients (
r
) between ‘‘true’’ residuals and absolute fat, lean dry
mass, and water for five species of small mammals.
Regression and
component Woodrat Chipmunk Meadow vole Red-backed
vole Deer mouse
RMA
Fat (g)
Lean dry mass (g)
Water (g)
0.340*
0.192
0.269*
0.221
0.332
0.355†
0.229
0.297†
0.387*
0.332*
0.170†
0.318*
0.405***
0.019
0.529***
MA
Fat (g)
Lean dry mass (g)
Water (g)
0.315*
0.167
0.264*
0.207
0.323
0.357†
0.184
0.268
0.336†
0.303*
0.228*
0.378***
0.371***
0.078
0.545***
Notes:
Residuals were obtained from the regression between body mass and body size (PC1
or body length) using reduced major axis (RMA) regression, and major axis (MA) regression.
Body length was used as an index of body size for meadow voles because body size components
did not load in consistent directions in a principal-components analysis.
P
,
0.10; *
P
,
0.05; ***
P
,
0.001.
T
ABLE
6. Proportion of false rejections of the null hypoth-
esis that energy reserves are independent of body size, in
simulations for four species of small mammals.
Species OLS MA RMA
Chipmunk
Deer mouse
Red-backed vole
Woodrat
0.0404
0.0476
0.0465
0.0408
0.1251
0.1746
0.0934
0.2902
0.1275
0.1815
0.0949
0.2966
Notes:
Proportions are based on 10 000 simulations for
each regression model. Key to abbreviations: OLS, ordinary
least squares regression; MA, major axis regression; RMA,
reduced major axis regression.
composition, suggests that RMA and MA regressions
do not offer many benefits when compared to OLS
regression.
Although recently called into question (Kotiaho
1999, Green 2001, Hayes and Shonkwiler 2001), re-
siduals from the body mass–body size OLS regressions
consistently explained significant amounts of variation
in fat, water, and lean dry mass. Residuals from RMA/
MA regression were often significantly correlated with
body components; however, the coefficient of deter-
mination was consistently lower in the RMA/MA anal-
ysis than in the OLS analysis. Therefore, qualitatively,
OLS residuals appeared to be somewhat superior to
RMA/MA residuals with respect to predicting body
composition.
RMA (or Model II) regression has been advocated
as a more appropriate approach for describing the func-
tional relationship between two variables measured
with error (LaBarbera 1989, Ebert and Russell 1994,
Herrera 1992, Fairbairn 1997). Most uses of regression
in ecology and evolution involve variables that are both
measured; thus there is error in both dependent and
independent variables. The use of OLS regression
(which assumes that Xvalues are measured without
error and set by the researcher) therefore seems inap-
propriate. There is abundant evidence that RMA slope
estimates accurately depict functional relationships be-
tween variables measured with error (McArdle 1988,
LaBarbera 1989, Legendre and Legendre 1998). How-
ever, if the purpose of regression is prediction, as is
done with residual indices of condition, OLS regression
is most appropriate (Legendre and Legendre 1998).
Calculating residuals as an index of condition requires
the comparison of observed mass to predicted mass. In
other words, residuals are used to determine why an
animal is heaver/lighter than predicted based on body
size. Because OLS regression minimizes error in Y
(mass), residuals from OLS regression should predict
body mass more precisely than RMA regression. Typ-
ically, measurement error is a major source of variation
in measures of body size (Yezerinac et al. 1992); there-
fore using the average of repeated measurements may
be one method of minimizing error in X(e.g., Schulte-
Hostedde and Millar 2000). Despite this approach, cor-
recting for measurement error, particularly in the con-
text of RMA and MA regression, requires the modeling
of error in both Xand Yvariables, something that is
rarely done (Carroll and Ruppert 1996). The arguments
contrasting OLS and RMA/MA residuals, however, be-
come trivial when
r
approaches 1 because the RMA
slope is equal to the OLS slope divided by the corre-
lation coefficient (Legendre and Legendre 1998).
An important issue in the evaluation of body con-
dition indices derived from mass–size regressions is
the high correlation between residuals and mass (Y).
In OLS regression, residuals and X(size) are indepen-
dent of each other, whereas residuals and Y(mass) are
positively related. In RMA regression, the correlations
between residuals and mass (Y) and size (X) are of
equal magnitude (Green 2001). This has the potential
to be a serious weakness of the use of OLS residuals
because, when validating residual indices of condition
against components of body mass (i.e., fat, lean dry
mass, water), these relationships may become biased
(i.e., relationships between residuals and fat, for ex-
ample, may tend to be significant because fat is a com-
ponent of mass). One reason for this bias is the cor-
related error structure which occurs between the mea-
162
ALBRECHT I. SCHULTE-HOSTEDDE ET AL.
Ecology, Vol. 86, No. 1
surement of total mass and its components (A. J. Green,
personal communication
). Any error in measuring mass
automatically affects the value of absolute fat, lean dry
mass, or water. Because modeling measurement error
was not done, it is impossible to assess the affects of
measurement error of mass on the error structure of the
data. Nonetheless, an alternative approach to validating
condition indices might be to examine these indices
against a mass-independent physiological measure of
condition such as levels of liver glycogen or blood
glucose.
Regardless of which condition index is used, it is
important that it correlate with constituents of body
composition. If condition is assumed to reflect variation
in fat, it is important to validate this assumption. As
seen here, condition does not necessarily reflect fat.
Body condition indices were more closely correlated
with lean dry mass and water in five species of small
mammals, perhaps because the proportion of body mass
composed of fat is often small (Schulte-Hostedde et al.
2001). Low protein reserves during periods of low food
resources indicate that small mammals may catabolize
protein to meet some energy requirements (Virgl and
Messier 1992, Zuercher et al. 1999). Determining the
degree to which condition indices correlate with energy
reserves requires the independent evaluation of body
composition.
A
CKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank all the assistants who measured body size and
conducted body composition analysis on all the samples. C.
D. Ankney, J. P. Hayes, and P. J. Weatherhead participated
in stimulating discussions on issues related to body condition.
We also thank T. A. F. Long and R. D. Montgomerie for
discussion and review of the manuscript. The manuscriptwas
also greatly improved by reviews from F. S. Dobson, A. El-
lison, A. J. Green, P. Legendre, and three anonymous re-
viewers. We particularly thank F. S. Dobson for his willing-
ness to improve the manuscript. This study was supported by
an NSERC operating grant to JSM.
L
ITERATURE
C
ITED
Bachman, G., and F. Widemo. 1999. Relationships between
body composition, body size and alternative reproductive
tactics in a lekking sandpiper, the Ruff (
Philomachus pug-
nax
). Functional Ecology 13:411–416.
Carroll, R. J., and D. Ruppert. 1996. The use and misuse of
orthogonal regression in linear errors-in-variables models.
American Statistician 50:1–6.
Dobson, F. S. 1992. Body mass, structural size, and life-
history patterns of the Columbian ground squirrel. Amer-
ican Naturalist 140:109–125.
Dobson, F. S., and G. R. Michener. 1995. Maternal traits and
reproduction in Richardson’s ground squirrels. Ecology76:
851–862.
Dobson, F. S., T. S. Risch, and J. O. Murie. 1999. Increasing
returns in the life-history of Columbian ground squirrels.
Journal of Animal Ecology 68:73–86.
Dobush, G. R., C. D. Ankney, and D. G. Krementz. 1985.
The effect of apparatus, extraction time, and solvent type
on lipid extraction in snow geese. Canadian Journal of Zo-
ology 63:1917–1920.
Ebert, T. A., and M. P. Russell. 1994. Allometry and model
II non-linear regression. Journal of Theoretical Biology
168:367–372.
Fairbairn, D. J. 1997. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism:
pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males
and females. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
28:659–687.
Fisher, D. O. 1999. Offspring sex-ratio variation in the bri-
dled nailtail wallaby,
Onychogalea fraenata
. Behavioural
Ecology and Sociobiology 45:411–419.
Green, A. J. 2001. Mass/length residuals: measures of body
condition or generators of spurious results? Ecology 82:
1473–1483.
Hayes, J. P., and J. S. Shonkwiler. 2001. Morphometric in-
dicators of body condition: worthwhile or wishful thinking?
Pages 8–38
in
J. R. Speakman, editor. Body composition
analysis of animals: a handbook of non-destructive meth-
ods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Herrera, C. M. 1992. Interspecific variation in fruit shape:
allometry, phylogeny, and adaptation to dispersal agents.
Ecology 73:1832–1841.
Heske, E. J., and R. S. Ostfeld. 1990. Sexual dimorphism in
size, relative size of testes, and mating systems in North
American voles. Journal of Mammalogy 71:510–519.
Hickling, G. J., J. S. Millar, and R. A. Moses. 1991. Repro-
duction and nutrient reserves of bushy-tailed woodrats
(
Neotoma cinerea
). Canadian Journal of Zoology 69:3088–
3092.
Iskjaer, C., N. A. Slade, J. E. Childs, G. E. Glass, and G. W.
Korch. 1989. Body mass as a measure of body size in small
mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 70:662–667.
Jakob, E. M., S. D. Marshall, and G. W. Uetz. 1996. Esti-
mating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices.
Oikos 77:61–67.
Judge, K. A., and R. J. Brooks. 2001. Chorus participation
by male bullfrogs,
Rana catesbeiana
: a test of the energetic
constraint hypothesis. Animal Behaviour 62:849–861.
Kerr, D. C., C. D. Ankney, and J. S. Millar. 1982. The effect
of drying temperature on extraction of petroleum ether sol-
uble fats of small birds and mammals. Canadian Journal
of Zoology 60:470–472.
Kotiaho, J. S. 1999. Estimating fitness: comparison of body
condition indices revisited. Oikos 87:399–400.
LaBarbera, M. 1989. Analyzing body size as a factor in ecol-
ogy and evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Sys-
tematics 20:97–117.
Legendre, P. 2001. Model II regression–User’s guide. De´-
partement de sciences biologiques, Universite´ de Montre´al.
^
http://www.fas.umontreal.ca/biol/legendre/
&
Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology.
Elsevier, Amsterdam.
McArdle, B. H. 1988. The structural relationship: regression
in biology. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66:2329–2339.
Merila¨, J., L. E. B. Kruuk, and B. C. Sheldon. 2001. Natural
selection on the genetical component of variance in body
condition in a wild bird population. Journal of Evolutionary
Biology 14:918–929.
Millar, J. S. 1987. Energy reserves in breeding small rodents.
Pages 231–240
in
Symposium of the Zoological Society
(London). Number 57.
Millar, J. S., and G. J. Hickling.1990. Fasting endurance and
the evolution of mammalian body size. Functional Ecology
4:5–12.
Millar, J. S., X. Xia, and N. B. Norrie. 1990. Relationships
among reproductive status, nutritional status, and food
characteristics in a natural population of
Peromyscus man-
iculatus
. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69:555–559.
Pimentel, R. A. 1979. Morphometrics: the multivariate anal-
ysis of biological data. Kendell/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque,
Iowa, USA.
Schluter, D., and L. Gustafsson. 1993. Maternal inheritance
of condition and clutch size in the collared flycatcher. Evo-
lution 47:658–667.
January 2005 163
BODY CONDITION INDICES
Schulte-Hostedde, A. I., and J. S. Millar. 2000. Measuring
sexual size dimorphism in the yellow-pine chipmunk (
Tam-
ias amoenus
). Canadian Journal of Zoology 79:1016–1020.
Schulte-Hostedde, A. I., J. S. Millar, andG. J. Hickling. 2001.
Evaluating body condition in small mammals. Canadian
Journal of Zoology 79:1021–1029.
Shine, R., M. P. LeMaster, I. T. Moore, M. M. Olsson, and
R. T. Mason. 2001. Bumpus in the snake den: effects of
sex, size, and body condition on mortality of red-sided
garter snakes. Evolution 55:598–604.
Speakman, J. R. 2001. Introduction. Pages 1–7
in
J. R. Speak-
man, editor. Body composition analysisof animals: a hand-
book of non-destructive methods. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, UK.
Virgl, J. A., and F. Messier. 1992. Seasonal variation in body
composition and morphology of adult muskrats in central
Saskatchewan, Canada. Journal of Zoology (London) 228:
461–477.
Wauters, L. A., and A. A. Dhondt. 1995. Lifetime reproduc-
tive success and its correlates in female Eurasian red squir-
rels. Oikos 72:402–410.
Weatherhead, P. J., F. E. Barry, G. P. Brown, and M. R. L.
Forbes. 1995. Sex ratios, mating behavior and sexual size
dimorphism of the northern water snake,
Nerodia sipedon
.
Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 36:301–311.
Weatherhead, P. J., K. W. Dufour, S. C. Lougheed, and C. G.
Eckert. 1999. A test of the good-genes-as-heterozygosity
hypothesis using red-winged blackbirds. Behavioral Ecol-
ogy 10:619–625.
Yezerinac, S. M., S. C. Lougheed, and P. Handford. 1992.
Measurement error and morphometric studies: statistical
power and observer experience. Systematic Biology 41:
471–482.
Zeurcher, G. L., D. D. Roby, and E. A. Rexstad. 1999. Sea-
sonal changes in body mass, composition, and organs of
northern red-backed voles in interior Alaska. Journal of
Mammalogy 80:443–459.
APPENDIX
Images of bushy-tailed woodrats are available in ESA’s Electronic Data Archive:
Ecological Archives
E086-010-A1.
... The term 'condition' is commonly employed to denote the overall health status of an animal, and more frequently, to describe the stored nutrient or energy reserves (Schulte-Hostedde et al. 2005). This parameter has been correlated with changes in the energy density of various organs (Jobling 1995;Lucas 1996). ...
... Notably, the condition of parent organisms plays a significant role in determining the viability of offspring (Brooks et al. 1997;Heyer et al. 2001;Berkeley et al. 2004). The evaluation of fish condition comprises a spectrum of criteria, ranging from simple morphometric measures such as the length-weight ratio (K factor) to morpho-physiological indicators such as hepatosomatic and gonadosomatic indices (Schulte-Hostedde et al. 2005). Additionally, biochemical measures, including proximate composition analysis covering lipids, proteins and other tissues constituents pro-durante el invierno, al inicio del período reproductivo, mientras que el índice hepatosomático y el factor de condición no difirieron entre estaciones. ...
Article
Full-text available
The term ‘condition’ is used to describe the overall health status of an animal and to describe its energy reserves. The storage and use of energy reserves are fundamental components of a species’ life strategy, and these processes directly influence the balance between current and future reproductive success. Understanding the energy allocation strategy adopted by a species is an important aspect in assessing possible variations in reproductive potential. The aim of this work was to analyse the seasonal variations of condition indices, biochemical composition, and energy density of different tissues in order to determine the strategy of energy allocation during the reproductive cycle of females Acanthistius patachonicus. Mature females were collected between April 2016 and March 2017 from commercial landings. Biochemical components such as lipids, proteins, and water content were measured in liver, gonad and muscle. The gonadosomatic index was highest during winter, at the beginning of the reproductive period, while the hepatosomatic index and condition factor did not differ among seasons. The study of the proximal composition of tissues revealed that the liver was the primary source of energy reserves. Highest values of these reserves in the liver were found before the onset of gonadal maturation (autumn). As the reproductive period progresses (winter and spring), these energy reserves decreased significantly, suggesting they were mobilized to support reproductive processes. This suggests that A. patachonicus primarily adopts a capital breeding strategy, but females possibly incorporate energy by feeding during the spawning period.
... The assumed benefit of heavier condition is based on relationships between condition and body composition (e.g., the amount of distinct body components such as fat or lean mass in an organism), and between composition and differences in fitness-associated traits. Different condition indices can be related to different elements of body composition across and within species [19][20][21] and between sexes [21,22]. Therefore, the choice of body condition index may be important for detecting a relationship between body condition and composition. ...
... There is little consensus on which index is best suited to describing relative condition or body composition of vertebrates [20,43,44]. Therefore, we evaluated the four most common body condition indices used in wildlife studies (Table 1). ...
Article
Full-text available
Body condition of animals is often assumed to reflect advantages in survival or reproduction, but body condition indices may not reflect body composition, or condition may be unrelated to fitness-associated traits. The relationship between body condition indices and composition has rarely been quantified in amphibians, and body condition has not previously been related to growth in adult amphibians. We used laboratory (quantitative magnetic resonance) and field methods to evaluate the relationship between body composition and the four common body condition indices for wildlife studies (body mass index, Fulton’s index, scaled mass index, and residual index) in two frog and one salamander species in Montana, USA. We then assessed the relationship between body condition and summertime somatic growth during a 3-yr mark-recapture study of one of our study species (Columbia spotted frogs, Rana luteiventris). Correlation of body condition indices with fat and lean mass differed across species, sexes, and whether components were represented as percentages or were scaled based on size. Scaled mass index, residual index, and Fulton’s index were most often well correlated (r > 0.6) with scaled body components, but Fulton’s index was strongly correlated with body length. Scaled mass and residual indices predicted scaled fat relatively well and were uncorrelated with body length. Heavier condition predicted higher growth rates of Columbia spotted frogs, regardless of the index used. Frogs of heavy body condition (90th percentile residual index) grew 0.04 and 0.05 mm/day greater than frogs of light condition (10th percentile) for average length males and females, respectively. Frogs of short body length (10th percentile) grew 0.11 and 0.19 mm/day more than long (90th percentile) males and females, respectively. By examining the relationship between body condition indices and body composition and revealing a link between condition and future growth, our results provide an empirical basis for choosing the most appropriate condition index, as well as a potential link to fitness-related traits.
... C-peptide has been validated in several primate species, shown to correspond with within-individual variation in body mass (bonobos [37]; macaques [35]), feeding rates and mass gain and loss (macaques [35]) and food availability (chimpanzees [38]; orangutans [39]; gorillas [40]; blue monkeys [41]). Body condition typically refers to the availability of energetic reserves, namely body fat and lean muscle [42]. To date, no non-invasive methods have been validated to measure body fat; however, an approximation of lean body mass is possible with a combination of urinary creatinine and specific gravity [43]. ...
... To date, no non-invasive methods have been validated to measure body fat; however, an approximation of lean body mass is possible with a combination of urinary creatinine and specific gravity [43]. Although lipids in adipose tissue are typically metabolized prior to protein in the lean muscle, the lean muscle still constitutes an energetic reserve [42,44]. Creatinine content of urine that exceeds expected values based on urine's specific gravity indicates relatively higher muscle mass, and lower muscle mass if creatinine falls below expected values. ...
Article
Full-text available
Evolutionary life history theory predicts that, during development, investment in immunity must be balanced with the demands of growth. How, and at what time scales, this balance is negotiated is unclear. In this study, we examined the potential energetic costs and limitations to cellular immune activity during development, its trade-offs with growth, related sickness behaviour and the role of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity in these relationships. We combined biomarker and socio-environmental data on wild juvenile blue monkeys collected over eight months. Rather than detract from energy balance (C-peptide) and growth of lean body mass (creatinine by specific gravity residuals), cellular immune activity (neopterin) increased with energy balance and lean body mass at monthly time scales, suggesting an energetic constraint on cellular immunity. At shorter time scales, higher neopterin diminished subsequent growth. Energetic constraints on immune activity were weakly regulated by HPA activity during low energy states. Our results suggest that cellular immune activity is both costly and limited by physical condition in wild developing primates.
... Body condition indexes have been commonly used to describe both the general health status of an animal and its nutritional or energy reserves (Schulte-Hostedde et al. 2005). The ability of an organism to acquire and manage energy resources, which are subsequently used to meet its energy demands, directly influences its overall body condition and associated indices (Jakob et al. 1996). ...
Article
Full-text available
The Patagonian redfish (Sebastes oculatus Valenciennes 1833) is a viviparous species inhabiting the mid and outer shelf waters, as well as the rocky reefs along the Patagonian coast of Argentina. At present, the energy allocation strategy of this species during reproduction remains unknown. Thus, in this study, we analyzed the variations in biochemical and bioenergetic condition indices of adult females over a seasonal cycle. A total of 157 specimens were collected by onboard observers in commercial vessels between November 2016 and September 2017. The gonadosomatic index (GSI), morphophysiological condition (hepatosomatic index HSI and relative condition factor Kn), and the proximate composition (lipids, proteins, and moisture) along with energy density in muscle, liver, and gonads, were evaluated. Results showed an increase in lipid and protein reserves in the muscle and gonads during winter, coinciding with the onset of maturation. It was also observed that the energy density (kJ g-1) in the liver and muscle decreases in spring, coinciding with the greatest gonadal development (GSI). The highest energy density values in muscle were recorded during winter, which coincides with increased feeding activity of the species, suggesting a reproductive strategy closer to a ‘capital breeder’, with energy storage prior to the beginning of spawning.
... To quantify body condition of each individual, we calculated the mean body mass (g) and mean hindfoot length (mm) for each individual from all of its captures (Schulte-Hostedde et al. 2005). To avoid the confounding effects of pregnancy on body condition estimates, we excluded from this calculation any captures when an individual was pregnant or when pregnancy status was listed as 'unknown'. ...
Article
Full-text available
Space use by animals is affected by multiple factors; previous researchers have examined the effects of influences, such as sex, body condition, and population density on home range area. However, evaluating the simultaneous influences of multiple factors on animal space use has been relatively intractable due to sample size limitations. We capitalize on National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) data to ask what factors determine space use by deer mice (genus Peromyscus). We examined data from 10 years of repeated captures of individually-identified mice at 36 sites across North America. We confirmed previous findings that males have larger home ranges than females and that home range area decreases with increasing animal density. In addition, our large sample size (N = 2,420 individuals) enabled us to examine the interacting influences of these, and other, phenotypic and extrinsic factors using a robust statistical framework. We found that the relationship between body condition and home range area differs between male and female mice, and that habitat type, latitude, and animal density all interact to influence space use. We conclude that data from large ecological networks can be used to examine important behavioral questions that have long eluded investigators. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-025-05731-2.
... However, BM alone is strongly influenced by an individual's body size (Balčiauskas et al. 2015). Therefore, ecologists often use body condition indices to account for variations in body size and to better assess an individual's energy reserves (i.e., fat or lean mass; Peig and Green 2010;Schulte-Hostedde et al. 2005). Depending on what kind of data can be measured in the field, different body condition indices are used (Labocha et al. 2014). ...
Article
Full-text available
Biodiversity is decreasing worldwide, and early indicators are needed to identify endangered populations before they start to decline in abundance. In mammals, body mass (BM) is regarded as an indicator of fitness, and its loss is used as an early warning signal preceding population decline. The garden dormouse (Eliomys quercinus, Gliridae, BM: 60–110 g) is a small mammalian hibernator that has disappeared from over 50% of its former range in the last decades. The aim of this study was to investigate whether garden dormice from a presumably thriving and stable population already show early warning signals, which may precede a population decline. We therefore conducted capture‐mark‐recapture studies during 2003–2005 (Period 1) and 2018–2021 (Period 2) in the Northern Black Forest, one of its last natural distribution areas in Germany. We collected fecal samples, measured BM, and tibia length as a proxy for size and age. Results revealed that in Period 2 adult dormice had a significantly lower (12%) pre‐hibernation BM, corrected for body size, and juveniles showed a significantly lower BM gain after weaning than nearly two decades ago. Fecal samples collected in Period 2 showed that arthropods represented the main food residues in fecal samples during juvenile growth and pre‐hibernation fattening. Ambient temperature during hibernation showed no correlation with BM at emergence. We could not detect a phenological time shift in reproduction; however, we found only one birth peak in Period 2, compared with two birth peaks in Period 1. Observed changes in BM and reproduction pattern represent early warning signals, as they point to an insufficient availability of high‐quality food, which prevents dormice from meeting their nutritional requirements, with potentially serious consequences for their reproductive success and survival. As arthropods are the dominant food resource, their decline may at least partly explain this phenomenon.
... For instance, HSI could be superior to other BCIs for assessing the physiological costs induced by parasites, as the index is calculated from liver mass, an organ that plays pivotal roles in energy reserves and immunity (Copeman et al., 2017). The RI allows researchers to quantify host health, regardless of fish body length (Jakob et al., 1996;Schulte-Hostedde et al., 2005, but see Green, 2001), and this index will be useful when fish exhibit hyper-or hypo-allometric growth. Recently, new methods for evaluating host health have been developed. ...
... Body condition was quantified using the residuals of logtransformed body mass regressed on log-transformed tarsus length (Schulte-Hostedde et al. 2005). To standardize measurements and account for body mass differences throughout the day, body mass was always measured in the morning after BMR measurements. ...
... The first principal component represented an overall measure of body size, explaining 41.2% of the variation in the morphometric data. We calculated the residuals of the relationship between body size and mass as an index of body condition (Schulte-Hostedde et al. 2005). Positive values represented individuals that were heavier than expected given their body size, and vice versa. ...
Article
Female investment in reproduction is a critical component of life history that influences both the fitness of the female and her offspring. Oviparous females can allocate energy into egg size and/or clutch size, and this allocation can vary over lifetimes, within populations and among species. However, we know little about whether investment decisions shift within breeding seasons and the factors that influence female reproductive strategies. We studied endogenous and exogenous factors associated with variation in female reproductive investment by measuring 860 eggs from 240 clutches laid by Grasshopper Sparrows Ammodramus savannarum between 2014 and 2019 at the Konza Prairie Biological Station in Manhattan, Kansas, USA. As the breeding season progressed, females laid smaller clutches of heavier eggs, indicating a shift in investment towards fewer but higher quality young. Females that were heavier than expected given their body size laid heavier and larger eggs, but maternal body condition was not related to clutch size. Brood parasitism by Brown‐headed Cowbirds Molothrus ater reduced the number of Grasshopper Sparrow eggs in nests, but was unrelated to host egg size or the total number of eggs that a female incubated, implying that sparrows do not adjust investment in response to parasitism risk. Pre‐laying ambient temperature and precipitation were not associated with egg size, yet females tended to lay more eggs under rainier conditions. Overall, we provide evidence that both endogenous and exogenous factors shape female reproductive investment. Understanding the flexibility of reproductive strategies in response to multiple sources of selection, and how this mediates key trade‐offs that influence demographic rates, can be used in forecasting population growth of bird species affected by anthropogenic changes to breeding areas.
Article
Understanding individual variation in adult condition is necessary for developing hypotheses on how nest initiation, chick development and recruitment are related in many migratory birds. We quantified attributes of condition among Franklin’s Gull (Lecuophaeus pipixcan) adults initiating nesting at different dates during the nesting period using four metrics: body measurements recorded from live-trapped birds, the corticosterone levels measured from blood samples collected serially from live-trapped birds, heterophil/lymphocyte ratios determined from blood smears and antimicrobial capacity of plasma. Variation in physiological condition was related to the timing of nesting such that individuals nesting later in the season had lower mass relative to skeletal size, increasing corticosterone concentrations measured 3-, 20- and 30-minute post-capture and reduced immune performance. Specifically, residual body mass decreased and keel bone exposure increased with laying date. Additionally, birds nesting later in the season show higher maximum corticosterone concentrations after exposure to acute capture stress along with reduced bacteria-killing capability of their plasma. Our findings indicate that timing of nesting is significantly related to the physiological condition of Franklin’s Gull. Individual variation in condition may be related to time constraints observed in temperate latitudes and whether these birds are capital (i.e. acquiring resources outside the breeding area) or income (i.e. acquiring resources locally) breeders. Quantifying variation in physiological condition within the breeding season will aid in modelling population-level response to shifts in nesting phenology.
Article
Full-text available
Abstract Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is common in both plants and animals, and current evidence suggests that it reflects the adaptation of males and females to their different reproductive roles. When species are compared within a clade, SSD is frequently found to vary with body size. This allometry is detected as β ≠ 1, where β is the slope of a model II regression of log(male size) on log(female size). Most frequently, β exceeds 1, indicating that SSD increases with size where males are the larger sex, but decreases with size where females are larger, a trend formalized as “Rensch's rule.” Exceptions are uncommon and associated with female-biased SSD. These trends are derived from a sample of 40 independent clades of terrestrial animals, primarily vertebrates. Their extension to plants and aquatic animals awaits quantitative assessments of allometry for SSD within these groups. Many functional hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of allometry for SSD, most featuring sexual selection on males or reproductive selection on females. Of these, the hypothesis that allometry evolves because of correlational selection between the sexes appears most promising as a general model but remains untested.
Article
Full-text available
Etude des relations entre la masse corporelle et la taille chez les petits mammiferes. Les especes etudiees sont Sigmadon huspidus, Microtus pennsylvanicus, M. ochrogaster, Peromyscus leucopus, Rattus norvegicus et Mus musculus
Article
Maternal effects may strongly influence evolutionary response to natural selection but they have been little studied in the wild. We use a novel combination of experimental and statistical methods to estimate maternal effects on condition and clutch size in the collared flycatcher, where we define "condition" to be the nongenetic component of clutch size. We found evidence of two maternal effects. The first (m) was the negative effect of mother's clutch size on daughter's condition, when mother's condition was held constant. The second (M) was the positive effect of mother's condition on daughter's condition, when mother clutch size was held constant. These two effects oppose one another because mothers in good condition also lay many eggs. The maternal effects were large: Experimentally adding an egg to a mother's nest reduced clutch sizes of her daughters by 1/4 egg (i.e., m = -0.25). Measured degree of resemblance between mother and daughter clutch sizes yielded M = 0.43. The results weakly support the presence of heritable genetic variation in clutch size: additive genetic variance/total phenotypic variance = 0.33. This estimate was highly variable probably because, as we show, mother-daughter resemblance may depend hardly at all on the amount of genetic variance when maternal effects are present. Daughter-mother regression (a standard method for estimating heritability) is consequently a poor guide to the amount of genetic variance in clutch size. Our results emphasize the value of combining field experiments with observations for studying inheritance.
Article
We compared digestibility of consumed food, dimensions of the alimentary tract, body fat and body size in relation to sex and reproductive status of overwintered adult Peromyscus maniculatus to assess the applicability of these measures of food intake and nutritional status to natural populations. Nonbreeding females were smaller than other sex and reproductive categories, but they had the largest alimentary tracts and energy reserves for their size. Lactating females were large, but they had low energy reserves and only averaged-sized alimentary tracts. Nonbreeding males ate relatively poor quality foods, had the smallest alimentary tracts for their size, and had low energy reserves. Most of these patterns were interpretable based on the known biology of this population. We conclude that these measures can provide insights into intraspecific variation in food intake and nutritional status in natural populations of Peromyscus.
Article
Reconsiders the evidence relating body size and fasting endurance, considers the evolution of both large and small sizes, and examines the relationship between fasting endurance and other environmental correlates of body size. -from Authors
Article
Sexual body-length dimorphism and relative size of testes were compared among 16 species (25 subspecies) of North American Microtus and Clethrionomys by use of data collected from museum specimens. Species with polygynous mating systems and territorial males had the greatest degree of sexual size dimorphism with males larger than females, and relatively small testes. Promiscuous species tended to show little or no sexual size dimorphism and relatively large testes. Species considered monogamous had no size dimorphism, and also had large testes. These data support the hypothesis that sexual dimorphism in size is correlated with the intensity of intrasexual competition for mates. However, the hypothesis that species with single-male breeding systems (single-male polygyny and monogamy) have relatively smaller testes than species with mating systems characterized by a high potential for sperm competition (promiscuity) was supported only for polygynous species.