ArticlePDF Available

Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx L.) from Croatia

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Primorsko-Goranska County in around 1903. Lynx dispersed back to Croatia after six animals were reintroduced to Slovenia from Slovakia in 1973. Today, lynx are under legislative protection in Croatia and its population is defined as highly endangered. Cranial morphometry was used to analyse a sample of 58 skulls obtained from animals of the reintroduced population in order to identify geographical variation, sexual dimorphism and sex-linked cranial characters. Eighty-five cranial measurements were recorded from each skull. Males were significantly larger than the females in 39 of the 85 cranial measurements, whereas only one measurement, the postorbital constriction, was greater in females. Our research indicates that lynx in Croatia are more similar to lynx from Czech than from Norway. No evidence was found for differences in cranial measurements between the Croatian reintroduced and the Balkan autochthonous lynx population, so there is no reason to define the later population as a separate subspecies, Lynx lynx martinoi ssp.
Content may be subject to copyright.
393
ISSN 0372-5480
Printed in Croatia
VETERINARSKI ARHIV 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from
L.) from
Croatia
Croatia
Tomislav Gomerčić
Tomislav Gomerčić
1
1
*, Magda Sindičić
*, Magda Sindičić
2
2
, Martina Đuras Gomerčić
, Martina Đuras Gomerčić
3
3
, Goran
, Goran
Gužvica
Gužvica
4
4
, Alojzije Frković
, Alojzije Frković
5
5
, Dubravka Pavlović
, Dubravka Pavlović
6
6
, Josip Kusak
, Josip Kusak
1
1
, Ana Galov
, Ana Galov
7
7
,
,
and Đuro Huber
and Đuro Huber
1
1
1
1
Department of Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Department of Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
2
2
Department of Game Biology, Pathology and Breeding, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb,
Department of Game Biology, Pathology and Breeding, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb,
Zagreb, Croatia
Zagreb, Croatia
3
3
Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb,
Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb,
Zagreb, Croatia
Zagreb, Croatia
4
4
Department of Ecogeography, Oikon Ltd, Institute for Applied Ecology, Zagreb, Croatia
Department of Ecogeography, Oikon Ltd, Institute for Applied Ecology, Zagreb, Croatia
5
5
Kvarnerska 43, Zagreb, Croatia
Kvarnerska 43, Zagreb, Croatia
6
6
Medoka doo, Zagreb, Croatia
Medoka doo, Zagreb, Croatia
7
7
Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Croatia
GOMERČIĆ, T., M. SINDIČIĆ, M. ĐURAS GOMERČIĆ, G. GUŽVICA,
GOMERČIĆ, T., M. SINDIČIĆ, M. ĐURAS GOMERČIĆ, G. GUŽVICA,
A. FRKOVIĆ, D. PAVLOVIĆ, J. KUSAK, A. GALOV, Đ. HUBER
A. FRKOVIĆ, D. PAVLOVIĆ, J. KUSAK, A. GALOV, Đ. HUBER
: Cranial
: Cranial
morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia. Vet. arhiv 80, 393-
L.) from Croatia. Vet. arhiv 80, 393-
410, 2010.
410, 2010.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
The last specimens of the autochthonous Eurasian lynx (
The last specimens of the autochthonous Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
) in Croatia were exterminated in
) in Croatia were exterminated in
Primorsko-Goranska County in around 1903. Lynx dispersed back to Croatia after six animals were reintroduced
Primorsko-Goranska County in around 1903. Lynx dispersed back to Croatia after six animals were reintroduced
to Slovenia from Slovakia in 1973. Today, lynx are under legislative protection in Croatia and its population
to Slovenia from Slovakia in 1973. Today, lynx are under legislative protection in Croatia and its population
is de ned as highly endangered. Cranial morphometry was used to analyse a sample of 58 skulls obtained
is de ned as highly endangered. Cranial morphometry was used to analyse a sample of 58 skulls obtained
from animals of the reintroduced population in order to identify geographical variation, sexual dimorphism and
from animals of the reintroduced population in order to identify geographical variation, sexual dimorphism and
sex-linked cranial characters. Eighty- ve cranial measurements were recorded from each skull. Males were
sex-linked cranial characters. Eighty- ve cranial measurements were recorded from each skull. Males were
signi cantly larger than the females in 39 of the 85 cranial measurements, whereas only one measurement, the
signi cantly larger than the females in 39 of the 85 cranial measurements, whereas only one measurement, the
postorbital constriction, was greater in females. Our research indicates that lynx in Croatia are more similar to
postorbital constriction, was greater in females. Our research indicates that lynx in Croatia are more similar to
lynx from Czech than from Norway. No evidence was found for differences in cranial measurements between
lynx from Czech than from Norway. No evidence was found for differences in cranial measurements between
the Croatian reintroduced and the Balkan autochthonous lynx population, so there is no reason to de ne the later
the Croatian reintroduced and the Balkan autochthonous lynx population, so there is no reason to de ne the later
population as a separate subspecies,
population as a separate subspecies,
Lynx lynx martinoi
Lynx lynx martinoi
ssp.
ssp.
Key words
Key words
: Eurasian lynx,
: Eurasian lynx,
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
, skull, cranial measurements
, skull, cranial measurements
*Corresponding author:
Tomislav Gomerčić, PhD, Department of Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Heinzelova 55, 10000
Tomislav Gomerčić, PhD, Department of Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Heinzelova 55, 10000
Zagreb, Croatia, Phone: +385 1 2390 158; Fax: +385 1 2390 158; E-mail: tomislav.gomercic@vef.hr
Zagreb, Croatia, Phone: +385 1 2390 158; Fax: +385 1 2390 158; E-mail: tomislav.gomercic@vef.hr
394 Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
Introduction
Introduction
Once spread all over Europe, Eurasian lynx (
Once spread all over Europe, Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.
L.
)
)
disappeared from most of
disappeared from most of
its habitat during the 18
its habitat during the 18
th
th
and 19
and 19
th
th
centuries, with populations remaining only in remote
centuries, with populations remaining only in remote
areas of Finland, Scandinavia, Siberia, Poland, and the Carpathian and Balkan peninsula
areas of Finland, Scandinavia, Siberia, Poland, and the Carpathian and Balkan peninsula
mountains (Kosovo, West Macedonia, Albania) (
mountains (Kosovo, West Macedonia, Albania) (
BIENIEK et al., 1998; SOLDO, 2001;
BIENIEK et al., 1998; SOLDO, 2001;
HRISTOVSKI, 2001;
HRISTOVSKI, 2001;
PAUNOVIĆ et al., 2001; BEGO, 2001; ZLATANOVA et al., 2001; SPASSOV
PAUNOVIĆ et al., 2001; BEGO, 2001; ZLATANOVA et al., 2001; SPASSOV
et al., 2001;
et al., 2001;
PANAYOTOPOULOU, 2001; BREITENMOSER-WÜRSTEN and BREITENMOSER,
PANAYOTOPOULOU, 2001; BREITENMOSER-WÜRSTEN and BREITENMOSER,
2001
2001
). Habitat loss, depletion of lynx prey and intensive hunting (
). Habitat loss, depletion of lynx prey and intensive hunting (
BREITENMOSER et
BREITENMOSER et
al., 1998
al., 1998
) were also reasons why the indigenous Eurasian lynx population disappeared
) were also reasons why the indigenous Eurasian lynx population disappeared
from the Dinaric Mountains. The last specimens of indigenous Eurasian lynx in Croatia
from the Dinaric Mountains. The last specimens of indigenous Eurasian lynx in Croatia
were exterminated in the Primorsko-Goranska County in around 1903 (
were exterminated in the Primorsko-Goranska County in around 1903 (
FRKOVIĆ, 2001
FRKOVIĆ, 2001
).
).
During the 20
During the 20
th
th
century lynx were not present in Croatia for over 70 years. However,
century lynx were not present in Croatia for over 70 years. However,
Eurasian lynx dispersed to Croatia after three females and three males were reintroduced
Eurasian lynx dispersed to Croatia after three females and three males were reintroduced
to Slovenia from Slovakia in 1973
to Slovenia from Slovakia in 1973
(
(
ČOP, 1988
ČOP, 1988
). The size of the recent population in Croatia
). The size of the recent population in Croatia
is estimated to be up to 60 animals (
is estimated to be up to 60 animals (
MAJIĆ-SKRBINŠEK, 2004
MAJIĆ-SKRBINŠEK, 2004
) and lynx in Croatia have
) and lynx in Croatia have
been a strictly protected species since 1995 (
been a strictly protected species since 1995 (
ANON
ANON
YM
YM
., 1995
., 1995
).
).
Lynx cranial measurements, as one of the relevant ecological traits, have been
Lynx cranial measurements, as one of the relevant ecological traits, have been
studied by numerous authors (
studied by numerous authors (
SAUNDERS, 1964; KVAM, 1983; ANDERSEN and WIIG,
SAUNDERS, 1964; KVAM, 1983; ANDERSEN and WIIG,
1984; GARCIA-PEREA et al.,
1984; GARCIA-PEREA et al.,
1985; WIIG and ANDERSEN, 1986; WIIG and ANDERSEN, 1988;
1985; WIIG and ANDERSEN, 1986; WIIG and ANDERSEN, 1988;
MIRIĆ and PAUNOVIĆ, 1992;
MIRIĆ and PAUNOVIĆ, 1992;
BELTRAN and DELIBES, 1993; ČERVENÝ and KOUBEK, 2000;
BELTRAN and DELIBES, 1993; ČERVENÝ and KOUBEK, 2000;
PERTOLDI et al., 2006
PERTOLDI et al., 2006
), but little quantitative data on the physical characteristics of the
), but little quantitative data on the physical characteristics of the
indigenous (extinct) (
indigenous (extinct) (
MIRIĆ, 1972; MIRIĆ, 1978
MIRIĆ, 1972; MIRIĆ, 1978
) and reintroduced (present) (
) and reintroduced (present) (
GOMERČIĆ
GOMERČIĆ
et al., 2009
et al., 2009
) Eurasian lynx population from Croatia are published. On the contrary, there
) Eurasian lynx population from Croatia are published. On the contrary, there
are many scienti cally unproved theories that animals from the indigenous population
are many scienti cally unproved theories that animals from the indigenous population
were smaller than the animals from the reintroduced population (
were smaller than the animals from the reintroduced population (
SOVILJ, 2008
SOVILJ, 2008
).
).
The goal of this paper was to study the morphometrical characteristics of skulls
The goal of this paper was to study the morphometrical characteristics of skulls
belonging to the Croatian reintroduced lynx population in order to identify geographical
belonging to the Croatian reintroduced lynx population in order to identify geographical
variations, sexual dimorphism and sex-linked cranial characters. Especial emphasis was
variations, sexual dimorphism and sex-linked cranial characters. Especial emphasis was
placed on a comparison of the now present, reintroduced Croatian lynx population with
placed on a comparison of the now present, reintroduced Croatian lynx population with
cranial data of the autochthonous lynx population present in Croatia until the 1900´s.
cranial data of the autochthonous lynx population present in Croatia until the 1900´s.
Materials and methods
Materials and methods
Skulls of 58 Eurasian lynx were examined morphometrically, 16 males, 35 females,
Skulls of 58 Eurasian lynx were examined morphometrically, 16 males, 35 females,
and seven specimens of unknown sex. Fifty-four skulls were trophy skulls obtained for
and seven specimens of unknown sex. Fifty-four skulls were trophy skulls obtained for
examination from private collections in the Primorsko-Goranska County, Croatia while
examination from private collections in the Primorsko-Goranska County, Croatia while
four skulls were deposited at the Department of Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
four skulls were deposited at the Department of Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
University of Zagreb, Croatia. The cause of death was known for 47 of the examined
University of Zagreb, Croatia. The cause of death was known for 47 of the examined
specimens: 43 skulls belonged to animals shot in a hunt, two were caught in traps, and
specimens: 43 skulls belonged to animals shot in a hunt, two were caught in traps, and
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
395
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
two were killed in traf c accidents. The location and time of the origin was known for 46
two were killed in traf c accidents. The location and time of the origin was known for 46
skulls. They were collected in the period from 1980 to 2004 in the Primorsko-Goranska
skulls. They were collected in the period from 1980 to 2004 in the Primorsko-Goranska
County, Croatia. Data on the body mass was known for 47 specimens.
County, Croatia. Data on the body mass was known for 47 specimens.
Cranial measurements were taken using digital calipers and read to one tenth of a
Cranial measurements were taken using digital calipers and read to one tenth of a
millimeter. Eighty- ve cranial measurements were obtained from each skull (Fig. 1).
millimeter. Eighty- ve cranial measurements were obtained from each skull (Fig. 1).
Thirty-seven measurements were similar for the left and for the right side of the skull. In
Thirty-seven measurements were similar for the left and for the right side of the skull. In
the later analyses the mean value of the summarized left and right side value was used. In
the later analyses the mean value of the summarized left and right side value was used. In
total 43 measurements were related to the cranial bones and 42 to the teeth. The recorded
total 43 measurements were related to the cranial bones and 42 to the teeth. The recorded
cranial measurements comprised those used by
cranial measurements comprised those used by
VON DEN DRIESCH (1976)
VON DEN DRIESCH (1976)
,
,
WERDELIN
WERDELIN
(1981)
(1981)
,
,
WIIG and ANDERSEN (1986)
WIIG and ANDERSEN (1986)
,
,
GARCÍA-PEREA et al. (1985)
GARCÍA-PEREA et al. (1985)
. For comparison with
. For comparison with
other lynx species and populations 19 cranial measurements were appropriate.
other lynx species and populations 19 cranial measurements were appropriate.
Fig. 1. Measurements of lynx skull, mandible, and teeth; the same ID number is used for the
Fig. 1. Measurements of lynx skull, mandible, and teeth; the same ID number is used for the
beginning and end point of the measurement
beginning and end point of the measurement
396 Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
Fig. 1. Measurements of lynx skulls, mandibles, and teeth
Fig. 1. Measurements of lynx skulls, mandibles, and teeth
1 - Pro le length: from
1 - Pro le length: from
Prosthion (rostral end of the interincisive suture) to Akrokranion (the most caudal
Prosthion (rostral end of the interincisive suture) to Akrokranion (the most caudal
median point)
median point)
2 - (left and right) Condylobasal length: from Prosthion to the most caudal point of the occipital condyle
2 - (left and right) Condylobasal length: from Prosthion to the most caudal point of the occipital condyle
3 - Median palatal length: from Prosthion to Staphylion (tip of the caudal end of the median palatine suture)
3 - Median palatal length: from Prosthion to Staphylion (tip of the caudal end of the median palatine suture)
4 - (left and right) Length from the most rostral point of the orbit to Akrokranion
4 - (left and right) Length from the most rostral point of the orbit to Akrokranion
5 - (left and right) Maxillar dental length: from Prosthion to the caudal margin of the fourth upper premolar
5 - (left and right) Maxillar dental length: from Prosthion to the caudal margin of the fourth upper premolar
(P
(P
4
4
) alveolus
) alveolus
6 - (left and right) Length from the rostral margin of the upper caninus (C
6 - (left and right) Length from the rostral margin of the upper caninus (C
1
1
) alveolus to the caudal margin of the
) alveolus to the caudal margin of the
upper third premolar (P
upper third premolar (P
3
3
) alveolus
) alveolus
7 - Zygomatic width: greatest width between the zygomatic arches
7 - Zygomatic width: greatest width between the zygomatic arches
8 - Postorbital constriction: least width caudal to the zygomatic processes of the frontal bones
8 - Postorbital constriction: least width caudal to the zygomatic processes of the frontal bones
9 - Interorbital constriction: least supraorbital width
9 - Interorbital constriction: least supraorbital width
10 - Mastoid width: greatest width between the mastoid processes of the temporal bones
10 - Mastoid width: greatest width between the mastoid processes of the temporal bones
11 - Condylar width: width between the most lateral points of the occipital condyles
11 - Condylar width: width between the most lateral points of the occipital condyles
12 - Rostral width: between the lateral margins of the C
12 - Rostral width: between the lateral margins of the C
1
1
alveoli
alveoli
13 - Maxillar dental width: between the lateral margins of P
13 - Maxillar dental width: between the lateral margins of P
4
4
alveoli
alveoli
14 - Skull width between the tips of the zygomatic processes of the frontal bones
14 - Skull width between the tips of the zygomatic processes of the frontal bones
15 - Skull width between the tips of the frontal processes of the zygomatic bones
15 - Skull width between the tips of the frontal processes of the zygomatic bones
16 - (left and right) Length of the zygomatic arch: from the caudal margin of the infraorbital foramen to the most
16 - (left and right) Length of the zygomatic arch: from the caudal margin of the infraorbital foramen to the most
caudal point of the zygomatic process of the temporal bone
caudal point of the zygomatic process of the temporal bone
17 - (left and right) Length from Nasion (junction on the median plane of the right and left nasofrontal sutures)
17 - (left and right) Length from Nasion (junction on the median plane of the right and left nasofrontal sutures)
to the tip of the frontal process of the zygomatic bone
to the tip of the frontal process of the zygomatic bone
18 - (left and right) Mandibular length: form the most rostral point of the mandible to the caudal end of the
18 - (left and right) Mandibular length: form the most rostral point of the mandible to the caudal end of the
angular process
angular process
19 - (left and right) Greatest mandibular length: from the most rostral point of the mandible to the most caudal
19 - (left and right) Greatest mandibular length: from the most rostral point of the mandible to the most caudal
point of the condyloid process
point of the condyloid process
20 - (left and right) Mandibular dental length: from the rostral margin of the lower rst incisor (I
20 - (left and right) Mandibular dental length: from the rostral margin of the lower rst incisor (I
1
1
) alveolus to
) alveolus to
the caudal margin of the lower rst molar (M
the caudal margin of the lower rst molar (M
1
1
) alveolus
) alveolus
21 - (left and right) Height of the ramus of the mandible: from the Coronion (dorsal border of the coronoid
21 - (left and right) Height of the ramus of the mandible: from the Coronion (dorsal border of the coronoid
process) to the ventral border of the angular process
process) to the ventral border of the angular process
22 - (left and right) Height from the Coronion to the middle point of the condyloid process
22 - (left and right) Height from the Coronion to the middle point of the condyloid process
23 - (left and right) Height from the middle point of the condyloid process to the ventral border of the angular
23 - (left and right) Height from the middle point of the condyloid process to the ventral border of the angular
process
process
24 - (left and right) Height of the body of the mandible at the caudal margin of the M
24 - (left and right) Height of the body of the mandible at the caudal margin of the M
1
1
alveolus
alveolus
25 - (left and right) Height of the body of the mandible at the rostral margin of the lower third premolar (P
25 - (left and right) Height of the body of the mandible at the rostral margin of the lower third premolar (P
3
3
)
)
alveolus
alveolus
26 - (left and right) Length from the rostral margin of P
26 - (left and right) Length from the rostral margin of P
3
3
alveolus to caudal margin of the P
alveolus to caudal margin of the P
4
4
alveolus
alveolus
27 - (left and right) Length from the rostral margin of P
27 - (left and right) Length from the rostral margin of P
3
3
alveolus to the caudal margin of M
alveolus to the caudal margin of M
1
1
alveolus
alveolus
28a - (left and right) Lower caninus (C
28a - (left and right) Lower caninus (C
1
1
)
)
width: between the lateral and medial surface of C
width: between the lateral and medial surface of C
1
1
at the level of its
at the level of its
insertion into the alveolus
insertion into the alveolus
28b - (left and right) C
28b - (left and right) C
1
1
length: between the rostral and caudal surface of C
length: between the rostral and caudal surface of C
1
1
at the level of its insertion into the
at the level of its insertion into the
alveolus
alveolus
28c - (left and right) C
28c - (left and right) C
1
1
enamel height: from the tip of C
enamel height: from the tip of C
1
1
to the enamel margin
to the enamel margin
28d - (left and right) C
28d - (left and right) C
1
1
height: from the tip of C
height: from the tip of C
1
1
to the margin of its alveolus
to the margin of its alveolus
29a - (left and right) P
29a - (left and right) P
3
3
width: between the lateral and medial surface of P
width: between the lateral and medial surface of P
3
3
at the level of its insertion into the
at the level of its insertion into the
alveolus
alveolus
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
397
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
29b - (left and right) P
29b - (left and right) P
3
3
length: between the rostral and caudal surface of P
length: between the rostral and caudal surface of P
3
3
at the level of its insertion into the
at the level of its insertion into the
alveolus
alveolus
30a - (left and right) Lower fourth premolar (P
30a - (left and right) Lower fourth premolar (P
4
4
)
)
width: between the lateral and medial surface of P
width: between the lateral and medial surface of P
4
4
at the level
at the level
of its insertion into the alveolus
of its insertion into the alveolus
30b - (left and right) P
30b - (left and right) P
4
4
length: between the rostral and caudal surface of P
length: between the rostral and caudal surface of P
4
4
at the level of its insertion into the
at the level of its insertion into the
alveolus
alveolus
31a - (left and right) M
31a - (left and right) M
1
1
width: between the lateral and medial surface of M
width: between the lateral and medial surface of M
1
1
at the level of its insertion into the
at the level of its insertion into the
alveolus
alveolus
31b - (left and right) M
31b - (left and right) M
1
1
rostral length: from the rostral margin of M
rostral length: from the rostral margin of M
1
1
to the middle notch
to the middle notch
at the level of its
at the level of its
insertion into the alveolus
insertion into the alveolus
31c - (left and right) M
31c - (left and right) M
1
1
caudal
caudal
length: from the middle notch to the caudal margin of M
length: from the middle notch to the caudal margin of M
1
1
at the level of its
at the level of its
insertion into the alveolus
insertion into the alveolus
32a - (left and right) C
32a - (left and right) C
1
1
width: between the lateral and medial surface of C
width: between the lateral and medial surface of C
1
1
at the level of its insertion into the
at the level of its insertion into the
alveolus
alveolus
32b - (left and right) C
32b - (left and right) C
1
1
length: between the rostral and caudal surface of C
length: between the rostral and caudal surface of C
1
1
at the level of the insertion into the
at the level of the insertion into the
alveolus
alveolus
32c - (left and right) C
32c - (left and right) C
1
1
enamel height: from the tip of C
enamel height: from the tip of C
1
1
to enamel margin
to enamel margin
32d - (left and right) C
32d - (left and right) C
1
1
height: from the tip of C
height: from the tip of C
1
1
to the border of its alveolus
to the border of its alveolus
33a - (left and right) P
33a - (left and right) P
3
3
width: between the lateral and medial surface of P
width: between the lateral and medial surface of P
3
3
at the level of its insertion into the
at the level of its insertion into the
alveolus
alveolus
33b - (left and right) P
33b - (left and right) P
3
3
length: between the rostral and caudal surface of P
length: between the rostral and caudal surface of P
3
3
at the level of its insertion into the
at the level of its insertion into the
alveolus
alveolus
34a - (left and right) P
34a - (left and right) P
4
4
width without protoconus: between the lateral and medial surface of the P
width without protoconus: between the lateral and medial surface of the P
4
4
at the level
at the level
of its insertion into the alveolus
of its insertion into the alveolus
34b - (left and right) P
34b - (left and right) P
4
4
length: between the rostral and caudal surface of P
length: between the rostral and caudal surface of P
4
4
at the level of its insertion into the
at the level of its insertion into the
alveolus
alveolus
34c - (left and right) P
34c - (left and right) P
4
4
width with protoconus: between the lateral and medial surface of P
width with protoconus: between the lateral and medial surface of P
4
4
at the level of its
at the level of its
insertion into the alveolus
insertion into the alveolus
34d - (left and right) P
34d - (left and right) P
4
4
protoconus length: between the rostral and caudal margins of the protoco
protoconus length: between the rostral and caudal margins of the protoco
nus
nus
In order to include only adult skulls in the statistical analysis of the cranial
In order to include only adult skulls in the statistical analysis of the cranial
measurements, the age of the examined specimens was determined. Age was determined
measurements, the age of the examined specimens was determined. Age was determined
by enumeration of root cementum annuli (
by enumeration of root cementum annuli (
KVAM, 1984
KVAM, 1984
). The third upper incisor (I3) was
). The third upper incisor (I3) was
used for age determination. It was determined that a total of 11 skulls belonged to animals
used for age determination. It was determined that a total of 11 skulls belonged to animals
younger than 3 years, so further analyses included 47 adult specimens.
younger than 3 years, so further analyses included 47 adult specimens.
The cranial measurements were analyzed separately for females and males to detect
The cranial measurements were analyzed separately for females and males to detect
sexual dimorphism and sex-linked cranial characters.
sexual dimorphism and sex-linked cranial characters.
Results
Results
The examined lynx skull sample included 16 males (31.4%), 35 females (68.6%), and
The examined lynx skull sample included 16 males (31.4%), 35 females (68.6%), and
seven specimens of unknown sex. The age was successfully determined in 55 animals
seven specimens of unknown sex. The age was successfully determined in 55 animals
(Fig. 2). Forty-four skulls belonged to animals aged three or more years. These skulls
(Fig. 2). Forty-four skulls belonged to animals aged three or more years. These skulls
were de ned as adult. Mean age for adults, animals older than three years, was 8.6 ± 3.4
were de ned as adult. Mean age for adults, animals older than three years, was 8.6 ± 3.4
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
398
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerč
i
ć et a
l
.: Cran
i
a
l
morp
h
ometry of t
h
e Euras
i
an
l
ynx
(Lynx lynx
Lynx
l
ynx
L.) from Croatia
L.
)
from Croat
i
a
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
years and 6.6 ± 2.8 years for males and females, respectively. The oldest female aged nine
years and 6.6 ± 2.8 years for males and females, respectively. The oldest female aged nine
years. Six males were older than nine, with the oldest aged 15 years.
years. Six males were older than nine, with the oldest aged 15 years.
In three skulls the age could not be determined but they had hardly visible skull
In three skulls the age could not be determined but they had hardly visible skull
bone sutures and were de ned as adult, too. Further analyses of body mass and cranial
bone sutures and were de ned as adult, too. Further analyses of body mass and cranial
measurements (Table 1) included 47 adult specimens, 15 males, 25 females, and seven
measurements (Table 1) included 47 adult specimens, 15 males, 25 females, and seven
of unknown sex.
of unknown sex.
The body mass of the adult specimens ranged from 15 to 28 kg (mean: 21.9 kg), and
The body mass of the adult specimens ranged from 15 to 28 kg (mean: 21.9 kg), and
from 12 to 25 kg (mean: 18.4 kg) in males and females, respectively. Adult male lynx had
from 12 to 25 kg (mean: 18.4 kg) in males and females, respectively. Adult male lynx had
signi cantly greater body mass (P<0.01). Their body mass value was on average 16.2%
signi cantly greater body mass (P<0.01). Their body mass value was on average 16.2%
higher than in females.
higher than in females.
Fig. 2. Age distribution of Eurasian lynx (
Fig. 2. Age distribution of Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
Fig. 3. Zygomatic width/postorbital constriction ratio indicates a sex-linked cranial feature in
Fig. 3. Zygomatic width/postorbital constriction ratio indicates a sex-linked cranial feature in
Eurasian lynx (
Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
Lynx age (year)
Number of individuals
Zygomatic width (mm)
Postorbital constriction (mm)
399
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerč
i
ć et a
l
.: Cran
i
a
l
morp
h
ometry of t
h
e Euras
i
an
l
ynx
(Lynx lynx
Lynx
l
ynx
L.) from Croatia
L.
)
from Croat
i
a
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
Table 1. Age, body mass, and cranial measurements of adult Eurasian lynx (
Table 1. Age, body mass, and cranial measurements of adult Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia (mean, standard deviation,
L.) from Croatia (mean, standard deviation,
range). Results of
range). Results of
t
t
-test for sexually dimorphic characters (p) and sexual difference (%).
-test for sexually dimorphic characters (p) and sexual difference (%).
Male (n = 15) Female (n = 25)
Male, female and unknown
sex (n = 47) p
Sexual
difference
(%)
Age (year) 8.6 ± 3.4 (4-15) 5.8 ± 1.7 (3-9) 6.6 ± 2.8 (3-15) 0.0025** 32.7
Body mass
(kg) 21.9 ± 3.9 (15-28) 18.4 ± 3.2 (12-25) 19.8 ± 3.7 (12-28) 0.0043** 16.2
Measurement (mm) #
1. 153.2 ± 7.4 (135.6-162.8) 145.5 ± 5.9 (133-154.5) 149.6 ± 7.8 (133-168.3) 0.0008** 5.0
2. 142.8 ± 3.7 (136.3-148.9) 133.5 ± 5.3 (121-141.5) 137.9 ± 6.7 (121-152.9) 0.0000** 6.5
3. 59.1 ± 1.5 (57-62.6) 55.8 ± 1.9 (52.5-58.9) 57.5 ± 2.5 (52.5-63.5) 0.0000** 5.6
4. 122.7 ± 2.9 (116.8-127.5) 115 ± 4.7 (103.4-121.7) 118.6 ± 5.6 (103.4-130) 0.0000** 6.3
5. 61.4 ± 1.5 (58.7-64) 58.3 ± 1.6 (54.8-60.9) 59.8 ± 2.2 (54.8-65) 0.0000** 4.9
6. 30.4 ± 1.1 (28.8-32.5) 28.4 ± 1.1 (25.8-30.4) 29.4 ± 1.5 (25.8-32.5) 0.0000** 6.6
7. 111.3 ± 3.2 (106.5-116.7) 103 ± 4.5 (90.3-108.6) 106.5 ± 5.7 (90.3-117.1) 0.0000** 7.5
8. 39.3 ± 2 (33.6-41.8) 40.5 ± 1.3 (37.9-42.3) 40.1 ± 1.6 (33.6-42.3) 0.0233* -3.1
9. 33.2 ± 1.9 (30.2-36.6) 30.6 ± 2.1 (25.3-33.2) 31.9 ± 2.4 (25.3-36.9) 0.0003** 8.0
10. 67.7 ± 1.9 (65-70.7) 63.9 ± 2.3 (58.5-67.4) 65.6 ± 2.9 (58.5-71.7) 0.0000** 5.6
11. 32.2 ± 1 (30.2-33.6) 31.4 ± 1 (29.2-33) 31.8 ± 1.1 (29.2-33.6) 0.0227* 2.4
12. 40.6 ± 1.5 (37.8-43) 37.5 ± 1.5 (33.6-39.7) 38.8 ± 2.1 (33.6-43) 0.0000** 7.5
13. 62.8 ± 1.4 (60-64.8) 59.9 ± 1.3 (57.1-61.5) 61.2 ± 1.9 (57.1-64.8) 0.0000** 4.6
14. 74.3 ± 2.6 (69.2-77.2) 70 ± 4.2 (58.2-74.4) 71.7 ± 4.2 (58.2-79.1) 0.0039** 5.8
15. 87.1 ± 2.8 (83.2-92.1) 83 ± 3.2 (72.9-87.7) 85 ± 3.6 (72.9-92.1) 0.0003** 4.7
16. 77 ± 2.2 (72.6-79.5) 72.3 ± 3.4 (63-75.8) 74.6 ± 3.9 (63-83.3) 0.0000** 6.0
17. 52.9 ± 1.3 (51.4-55.5) 50.2 ± 2.2 (45.3-53.4) 51.5 ± 2.3 (45.3-55.8) 0.0001** 5.0
18. 106.8 ± 3.5 (101-114.5) 99 ± 4.7 (87.5-104.8) 102.5 ± 5.8 (87.5-114.6) 0.0000** 7.3
19. 106.7 ± 2.8 (102-110.5) 99.4 ± 4.4 (89-105.3) 102.6 ± 5.2 (89-113.1) 0.0000** 6.8
20. 61.6 ± 1.6 (59.3-64.4) 58.3 ± 1.6 (54.9-60.8) 59.7 ± 2.2 (54.9-64.4) 0.0000** 5.4
21. 46.6 ± 2 (43.6-49.6) 42 ± 2.2 (36.7-44.6) 44.1 ± 3.2 (36.7-51.7) 0.0000** 9.8
400
22. 29.7 ± 1.5 (27.1-32) 27 ± 1.7 (22-29.1) 28.2 ± 2.1 (22-32.4) 0.0000** 8.9
23. 17.4 ± 1.1 (15.6-19.7) 15.4 ± 1 (13-17.1) 16.3 ± 1.4 (13-19.7) 0.0000** 11.2
24. 22.1 ± 1.1 (19.7-23.9) 20.3 ± 1.1 (18.1-22.3) 21.2 ± 1.4 (18.1-24.2) 0.0000** 8.2
25. 20.3 ± 0.8 (19-21.5) 19.2 ± 0.7 (17.8-20.2) 19.7 ± 1 (17.8-22.2) 0.0000** 5.7
26. 30.3 ± 1 (28.5-31.8) 29.3 ± 0.6 (28.3-30.5) 29.7 ± 0.9 (28.3-31.8) 0.0001** 3.5
27. 37.7 ± 1 (35.9-39.1) 36.6 ± 1 (34.7-38.8) 37.1 ± 1.1 (34.7-39.1) 0.0007** 3.0
28a. 6.9 ± 0.4 (6-7.6) 6.4 ± 0.2 (5.8-6.8) 6.7 ± 0.4 (5.8-7.6) 0.0000** 7.8
28b. 9 ± 0.5 (8-9.5) 8.4 ± 0.4 (7.6-9.4) 8.7 ± 0.5 (7.6-9.5) 0.0000** 7.5
28c. 17.5 ± 1 (15.4-19.3) 16.9 ± 0.8 (14.5-18.6) 17.1 ± 1.2 (11.9-19.3) 0.0004** 3.7
28d. 20.9 ± 2.7 (11.8-23.6) 19.9 ± 3.3 (5.6-25.9) 20.3 ± 3 (5.6-25.9) 0.3012 5.0
29a. 5.4 ± 0.3 (4.9-6) 5.3 ± 0.3 (4.8-6.1) 5.4 ± 0.3 (4.8-6.1) 0.7021 0.7
29b. 10.3 ± 0.4 (9.7-11) 9.9 ± 0.4 (8.7-10.5) 10.1 ± 0.5 (8.7-11.7) 0.0016** 4.0
30a. 5.9 ± 0.3 (5.5-6.4) 5.8 ± 0.4 (4.9-6.5) 5.9 ± 0.3 (4.9-6.5) 0.2608 2.0
30b. 12.4 ± 0.4 (11.8-13.4) 12.1 ± 0.4 (11.4-12.8) 12.2 ± 0.4 (11.4-13.4) 0.0083** 2.8
31a. 6.6 ± 0.2 (6.2-7) 6.5 ± 0.2 (5.9-6.9) 6.5 ± 0.2 (5.9-7) 0.1338 1.8
31b. 6.8 ± 0.4 (6-7.5) 6.5 ± 0.2 (6.1-7.1) 6.7 ± 0.3 (6-7.5) 0.0083** 4.0
31c. 10 ± 0.3 (9.3-10.3) 9.9 ± 0.3 (9.4-10.6) 9.9 ± 0.3 (9.3-10.6) 0.1156 1.6
32a. 7.8 ± 0.4 (7.2-8.6) 7.2 ± 0.3 (6.6-8) 7.5 ± 0.4 (6.6-8.6) 0.0000** 7.0
32b. 9.7 ± 0.5 (8.8-10.3) 9 ± 0.5 (8.5-10.7) 9.3 ± 0.6 (8.5-10.7) 0.0001** 7.0
32c. 18.4 ± 1.6 (14.5-20.2) 17.4 ± 2.8 (4.9-20.3) 18 ± 2.4 (4.9-20.9) 0.2481 5.2
32d. 23.5 ± 5.1 (6.5-27.7) 22.8 ± 2.9 (11.4-28.3) 23.3 ± 3.6 (6.5-28.3) 0.5399 3.3
33a. 6.4 ± 0.4 (5.6-6.9) 6.3 ± 0.3 (6.1-6.9) 6.4 ± 0.3 (5.6-7) 0.2868 1.6
33b. 11.9 ± 0.5 (10.9-13) 11.6 ± 0.3 (11-12.5) 11.7 ± 0.4 (10.9-13) 0.0085** 3.0
34a. 6.9 ± 0.2 (6.5-7.4) 6.7 ± 0.3 (6.3-7.5) 6.8 ± 0.3 (6.3-7.5) 0.0160* 3.0
34b. 18.4 ± 0.8 (16.6-19.3) 17.9 ± 0.4 (17.4-18.8) 18.1 ± 0.6 (16.6-19.5) 0.0000** 2.6
34c. 8.5 ± 0.4 (8-9.4) 8.2 ± 0.3 (7.7-8.7) 8.3 ± 0.4 (7.7-9.4) 0.0017** 4.2
34d. 3.2 ± 0.3 (2.8-3.9) 3.1 ± 0.2 (2.6-3.5) 3.1 ± 0.28 (2.6-3.9) 0.1306 4.3
*- P<0.05; **- P<0.01;
*- P<0.05; **- P<0.01;
#
#
- the list and description of measurements are shown in Materials and methods
- the list and description of measurements are shown in Materials and methods
Table 1. (Continued)
Table 1. (Continued)
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
401
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
Table 2. Cranial measurements and body mass of the genus Lynx
Lynx (Lynx lynx)
from Croatia (this
study)a
Lynx (Lynx
canadensis) from
Newfoundland
(SAUNDERS.
1964)b
Iberian lynx
(Lynx pardinus)
(GARCÍA-PEREA
et al., 1985)
Lynx (Lynx lynx)
from Norway.
(WIIG and
ANDERSEN,
1986)c
Lynx (Lynx lynx)
from Czech.
(ČERVENÝ and
KOUBEK, 2000)
Lynx (Lynx lynx
from the Balkan
(MIRIĆ, 1978,
1981)
Body
mass
(kg)
male 21.9 ± 3.9 n = 15
(15.0-28.0)
23.5 n = 94
(14.0-38.0)
21.8 ± 3.6 n = 25
(14.0-28.0)
female 18.4 ± 3.2 n = 25
(12.0-25.0)
18.9 n = 91
(11.0-26.0)
16.8 ± 2.7 n = 17
(13.0-22.0)
Measurement (mm)d
1.
male 153.2 ± 7.4 n = 15
(135.6-162.8) 129 ± 4.1 n = 23** 133.7 ± 2.5 n = 12
(128.7-137.8)** 153.1 ± 5.1 n = 75 153.3 ± 6.7 n = 43
(137.0-165.1) 151.8 n = 1
female 145.5 ± 5.9 n = 25
(133.0-154.5) 122 ± 3.0 n = 13** 121.8 ± 4.2 n = 8
(113.6-126.2)** 143.0 ± 4.4 n = 56* 145.4 ± 6.3 n = 32
(130.2-157.1)
141.3 ± 1.2 n = 3
(140.0-142.3)
2.
male 142.8 ± 3.7 n = 15
136.3-148.9
121.7 ± 2.6 n = 10
(116.8-125.4)**
139.0 ± 4.4 n =
75**
139.3 ± 9.1 n = 43
(122.0-159.1) 136.5 n = 1
female 133.5 ± 5.3 n = 25
(121.0-141.5)
110.0 ± 4.0 n = 7
(102.6-114.9)**
130.5 ± 3.8 n =
56**
131.4 ± 4.2 n = 32
(121.5-141.5)
127.8 ± 1.4 n = 3
(126.5-129.3)
3.
male 59.1 ± 1.5 n = 15
(57.0-62.6)
52.0 ± 1.6 n = 10
(49.9-55.4)** 58.9 ± 2.1 n = 75 57.1 ± 2.8 n = 43
(51.2-66.4)*
female 55.8 ± 1.9 n = 25
(52.5-58.9)
46.8 ± 2.1 n = 9
(43.8-49.7)** 55.3 ± 1.9 n = 56 54.8 ± 1.9 n = 32
(49.8-58.5)
5.
male 61.4 ± 1.5 n = 15
(58.7-64.0) 60.8 ± 2.0 n = 75 54.7 ± 2.0 n = 43
(50.3-58.3)**
female 58.3 ± 1.6 n = 25
(54.8-60.9) 57.4 ± 1.7 n = 56* 52.9 ± 1.7 n = 32
(48.7-56.0)**
402
7.
male 111.3 ± 3.2 n = 15
(106.5-116.7) 94 ± 3.2 n = 24** 95.6 ± 2.3 n = 10
(92.9-100.8)**
101.3 ± 3.7 n =
75**
107.7 ± 5.6 n = 43
(97.0-118.2)* 106.1 n = 1
female 103.0 ± 4.5 n = 25
(90.3-108.6) 89 ± 1.9 n = 13** 86.5 ± 4.3 n = 10
(80.9-93.5)** 95.4 ± 3.1 n = 56** 102.2 ± 3.4 n = 32
(92.3-108.6)
99.6 ± 2.5 n = 3
(97.8-102.5)
8.
male 39.3 ± 2.0 n = 15
(33.6-41.8)
39.8 ± 1.4 n = 12
(38.1-42.7) 37.8 ± 1.6 n = 75** 40.4 ± 2.7 n = 43
(32.8-46.8)
female 40.5 ± 1.3 n = 25
(37.9-42.3)
40.4 ± 1.1 n = 10
(39.2-42.6) 38.6 ± 1.9 n = 56** 39.2 ± 2.1 n = 32
(34.3-43.4)**
9.
male 33.2 ± 1.9 n = 15
(30.2-36.6) 33.1 ± 1.6 n = 75 34.7 ± 3.3 n = 43
(28.4-44.0) 31.5 n = 1
female 30.6 ± 2.1 n = 25
(25.3-33.2) 31.0 ± 1.4 n = 56** 33.1 ± 2.7 n = 32
(28.5-39.8)**
32.6 ± 1.4 n = 3
(31.2-34.0)
10.
male 67.7 ± 1.9 n = 15
(65.0-70.7)
58.2 ± 1.3 n = 11
(55.4-60.0)** 65.4 ± 2.0 n = 75** 65.9 ± 3.7 n = 43
(56.4-72.2)
female 63.9 ± 2.3 n = 25
(58.5-67.4)
53.5 ± 2.2 n = 8
(50.5-56.3)** 61.2 ± 1.7 n = 56** 62.4 ± 2.8 n = 32
(56.6-68.2)*
11.
male 32.2 ± 1.0 n = 15
(30.2-33.6) 33.9 ± 1.0 n = 75**
female 31.4 ± 1.0 n = 25
(29.2-33.0) 32.7 ± 1.0 n = 56**
12.
male 40.6 ± 1.5 n = 15
(37.8-43.0)
33.7 ± 0.9 n = 13
(32.0-35.1)** 39.2 ± 1.4 n = 75**
female 37.5 ± 1.5 n = 25
(33.6-39.7)
30.7 ± 1.6 n = 10
(28.1-32.4)** 36.7 ± 1.3 n = 56*
13.
male 62.8 ± 1.4 n = 15
(60.0-64.8) 61.6 ± 1.8 n = 75*
female 59.9 ± 1.3 n = 25
(57.1-61.5) 58.9 ± 1.7 n = 56*
Table 2. (Continued)
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
403
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
14.
male 74.3 ± 2.6 n = 15
(69.2-77.2)
63.8 ± 2.4 n = 8
(58.2-66.2)**
69.5 ± 4.4 n = 43
(57.9-78.2)**
female 70.0 ± 4.2 n = 25
(58.2-74.4)
57.7 ± 3.8 n = 7
(53.5-62.6)**
67.1 ± 2.7 n = 32
(61.6-73.4)**
18.
male 106.8 ± 3.5 n = 15
(101.0-114.5)
89.0 ± 2.1 n = 12
(86.4-94.2)**
102.3 ± 3.5 n =
74** 106.9 n = 1
female 99.0 ± 4.7 n = 25
(87.5-104.8)
79.7 ± 3.2 n = 11
(74.8-84.4)** 95.6 ± 3.0 n = 56** 99.9 ± 1.5 n = 3
(98.5-101.4)
19.
male 106.7 ± 2.8 n = 15
(102.0-110.5)
89.6 ± 1.9 n = 12
(87.5-94.5)**
103.1 ± 3.5 n = 43
(95.0-110.5)**
female 99.4 ± 4.4 n = 25
(89.0-105.3)
81.2 ± 3.1 n = 11
(76.2-85.3)**
99.5 ± 2.7 n = 32
(91.8-103.7)
20.
male 61.6 ± 1.6 n = 15
(59.3-64.4)
48.9 ± 1.0 n = 12
(47.5-50.3)** 56.7 ± 1.7 n = 74**
female 58.3 ± 1.6 n = 25
(54.9-60.8)
44.3 ± 1.6 n = 10
(41.9-46.5)** 53.6 ± 1.6 n = 56**
21.
male 46.6 ± 2.0 n = 15
(43.6-49.6)
37.1 ± 1.1 n = 12
(36.0-39.4)** 46.8 ± 2.2 n = 74 45.3 ± 2.7 n = 43
(39.0-51.2)
female 42.0 ± 2.2 n = 25
(36.7-44.6)
32.4 ± 2.1 n = 11
(29.5-35.0)** 42.4 ± 1.9 n = 56 42.0 ± 2.2 n = 32
(38.4-49.2)
26.
male 30.3 ± 1.0 n = 15
(28.5-31.8)
24.6 ± 0.8 n = 14
(22.7-25.7)**
female 29.3 ± 0.6 n = 25
(28.3-30.5)
22.8 ± 1.0 n = 11
(20.6-23.7)**
34b.
male 18.4 ± 0.8 n = 15
(16.6-19.3)
15.4 ± 0.5 n = 11
(14.4-16.2)** 18.6 ± 0.7 n = 74 18.1 n = 2
(17.5-18.7)
female 17.9 ± 0.4 n = 25
(17.4-18.8)
14.3 ± 0.6 n = 11
(13.5-15.1)** 17.7 ± 0.8 n = 56 18.1 ± 1.3 n = 3
(17.2-19.5)
Table 2. (Continued)
404
34c.
male 8.5 ± 0.4 n = 15
(8.0-9.4)
7.2 ± 0.5 n = 11
(6.3-7.9)**
female 8.2 ± 0.3 n = 25
(7.7-8.7)
6.6 ± 0.4 n = 11
(5.9-7.3)**
* - signi cantly differs from the Croatian population (P<0.05)
* - signi cantly differs from the Croatian population (P<0.05)
** - signi cantly differs from the Croatian population (P<0.01)
** - signi cantly differs from the Croatian population (P<0.01)
a - animals at age of 3 years and older
a - animals at age of 3 years and older
b - adults with fused epiphysis of the humerus
b - adults with fused epiphysis of the humerus
c - animals of age between 17 and 60 months, the measurements corrected to the value of 33.9 months old lynx
c - animals of age between 17 and 60 months, the measurements corrected to the value of 33.9 months old lynx
d- the list and description of measurements is in Materials and methods
d- the list and description of measurements is in Materials and methods
Table 2. (Continued)
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
405
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
Fig. 4. Maxillar dental width/postorbital constriction ratio indicates another sex-linked cranial
Fig. 4. Maxillar dental width/postorbital constriction ratio indicates another sex-linked cranial
feature in Eurasian lynx (
feature in Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
Fig. 5. Prominent external sagittal crest (crista sagittalis externa) in males (a: LS10, 8 years; b:
Fig. 5. Prominent external sagittal crest (crista sagittalis externa) in males (a: LS10, 8 years; b:
LS52, 15 years) compared to a female (c: LS51, 8 years)
LS52, 15 years) compared to a female (c: LS51, 8 years)
Postorbital constriction (mm)
Maxilar dental width
406
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
Males were signi cantly larger than the females in 39 (45.88%) of 85 cranial
Males were signi cantly larger than the females in 39 (45.88%) of 85 cranial
measurements. Only one cranial measurement, namely the postorbital constriction (8), was
measurements. Only one cranial measurement, namely the postorbital constriction (8), was
larger in females than in males. The value of the postorbital constriction was on average
larger in females than in males. The value of the postorbital constriction was on average
3.1% higher in females than in males (Table 1). Values of male cranial measurements
3.1% higher in females than in males (Table 1). Values of male cranial measurements
were on average 5% higher than in females, ranging from 0.7% to 11.2%. The main
were on average 5% higher than in females, ranging from 0.7% to 11.2%. The main
cranial characters such as the pro le length (1) and the zygomatic width (7), were both
cranial characters such as the pro le length (1) and the zygomatic width (7), were both
signi cantly greater in males (P<0.01). Sex-linked cranial features are indicated in the
signi cantly greater in males (P<0.01). Sex-linked cranial features are indicated in the
zygomatic width/postorbital constriction ratio and maxillar dental width/postorbital
zygomatic width/postorbital constriction ratio and maxillar dental width/postorbital
constriction ratio. Both ratios are smaller in the males (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4). None of the
constriction ratio. Both ratios are smaller in the males (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4). None of the
nine teeth measurements (28d, 29a, 30a, 31a, 31c, 32c, 32d, 33a, 34d) showed any sexual
nine teeth measurements (28d, 29a, 30a, 31a, 31c, 32c, 32d, 33a, 34d) showed any sexual
dimorphism (P>0.05). The mid-dorsal external sagittal crest (crista sagittalis externa) was
dimorphism (P>0.05). The mid-dorsal external sagittal crest (crista sagittalis externa) was
well developed in males, and in most male skulls it was very prominent, extending up to
well developed in males, and in most male skulls it was very prominent, extending up to
the caudal border of the frontal bones. The external sagittal crest was not prominent in
the caudal border of the frontal bones. The external sagittal crest was not prominent in
any of the female skulls and did not extend as rostral as in males (Fig. 5).
any of the female skulls and did not extend as rostral as in males (Fig. 5).
Skull size showed a low correlation to the age and body mass. The pro le length
Skull size showed a low correlation to the age and body mass. The pro le length
showed no correlation with the age (R
showed no correlation with the age (R
2
2
= 0.0775) and a very low correlation with the
= 0.0775) and a very low correlation with the
body mass (R
body mass (R
2
2
for both sexes = 0.1053, i.e. 0.148 and 0.116 for males and females,
for both sexes = 0.1053, i.e. 0.148 and 0.116 for males and females,
respectively).
respectively).
Discussion
Discussion
Our statistical analysis included 85 cranial measurements of 47 Eurasian lynx skulls
Our statistical analysis included 85 cranial measurements of 47 Eurasian lynx skulls
from Croatia, belonging to animals older than 3 years. Namely,
from Croatia, belonging to animals older than 3 years. Namely,
GARCIA-PEREA (1991)
GARCIA-PEREA (1991)
stated that lynx cranial measurements are age related and
stated that lynx cranial measurements are age related and
ANDERSEN and WIIG (1984)
ANDERSEN and WIIG (1984)
concluded that lynx skull growth stops at the age of three. The third upper incisor (I
concluded that lynx skull growth stops at the age of three. The third upper incisor (I
3
3
)
)
has been used for age determination, which is different than the canine used in the work
has been used for age determination, which is different than the canine used in the work
of
of
CROWE (1972) and KVAM (1984)
CROWE (1972) and KVAM (1984)
. The I
. The I
3
3
has been used for age determination to avoid
has been used for age determination to avoid
signi cant damage of the trophy skulls. Cranial morphometry was used to identify sexual
signi cant damage of the trophy skulls. Cranial morphometry was used to identify sexual
dimorphism and sex-linked cranial characters, which have already been described in other
dimorphism and sex-linked cranial characters, which have already been described in other
lynx populations (
lynx populations (
GARCIA-PEREA et al., 1985; BELTRAN and DELIBES, 1993
GARCIA-PEREA et al., 1985; BELTRAN and DELIBES, 1993
).
).
The Croatian population of Eurasian lynx expressed sexual dimorphism in skull size
The Croatian population of Eurasian lynx expressed sexual dimorphism in skull size
but also in body mass. Our results correspond with data of the Norwegian lynx (
but also in body mass. Our results correspond with data of the Norwegian lynx (
WIIG
WIIG
and ANDERSEN, 1986
and ANDERSEN, 1986
), where 15 cranial measurements were signi cantly larger in males
), where 15 cranial measurements were signi cantly larger in males
than females, while only the postorbital constriction was signi cantly larger in females.
than females, while only the postorbital constriction was signi cantly larger in females.
Even though
Even though
WERDELIN (1981)
WERDELIN (1981)
did not establish any statistically signi cant differences
did not establish any statistically signi cant differences
between male and female lynx skulls, because his study also included juvenile skulls,
between male and female lynx skulls, because his study also included juvenile skulls,
both
both
WIIG and ANDERSEN (1986)
WIIG and ANDERSEN (1986)
and
and
ČERVENÝ and KOUBEK (2000)
ČERVENÝ and KOUBEK (2000)
con rmed sexual
con rmed sexual
dimorphism in lynx skull size.
dimorphism in lynx skull size.
407
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
Skulls of male lynx from Croatian can be distinguished from the female skulls by the
Skulls of male lynx from Croatian can be distinguished from the female skulls by the
more prominent sagittal external crest and by two ratios: the zygomatic width/postorbital
more prominent sagittal external crest and by two ratios: the zygomatic width/postorbital
constriction ratio and the maxillar dental width/postorbital constriction ratio, which are
constriction ratio and the maxillar dental width/postorbital constriction ratio, which are
both smaller in males.
both smaller in males.
Eurasian lynx from Croatia are signi cantly larger than the Iberian lynx (
Eurasian lynx from Croatia are signi cantly larger than the Iberian lynx (
Lynx
Lynx
pardina
pardina
) (
) (
GARCÍA-PEREA et al., 1985
GARCÍA-PEREA et al., 1985
) in 14 out of 15 cranial measurements (Table 2).
) in 14 out of 15 cranial measurements (Table 2).
Cranial measurements of the Canadian lynx (
Cranial measurements of the Canadian lynx (
SAUNDERS, 1964
SAUNDERS, 1964
) are smaller than those
) are smaller than those
of the Croatian Eurasian lynx (this study) but the body mass does not show a signi cant
of the Croatian Eurasian lynx (this study) but the body mass does not show a signi cant
difference between these two lynx species (Table 2). Compared to other Eurasian lynx
difference between these two lynx species (Table 2). Compared to other Eurasian lynx
populations the Croatian population shows particular differences. The lynx from Croatia
populations the Croatian population shows particular differences. The lynx from Croatia
is more similar to lynx from the Czech Republic (
is more similar to lynx from the Czech Republic (
ČERVENÝ and KOUBEK, 2000
ČERVENÝ and KOUBEK, 2000
) than
) than
those from Norway (
those from Norway (
WIIG and ANDERSEN, 1986
WIIG and ANDERSEN, 1986
). The difference between Norwegian and
). The difference between Norwegian and
Croatian lynx was established in 12 female and 9 male cranial measurements. Norwegian
Croatian lynx was established in 12 female and 9 male cranial measurements. Norwegian
lynx have only two measurements greater in female skulls and one measurement greater
lynx have only two measurements greater in female skulls and one measurement greater
in male skulls, while all other measurements were signi cantly smaller in skulls from
in male skulls, while all other measurements were signi cantly smaller in skulls from
Norwegian lynx. There are most similarities in the cranial measurements of the Croatian
Norwegian lynx. There are most similarities in the cranial measurements of the Croatian
and Czech lynx populations. Out of 11 measurements compared only ve are signi cantly
and Czech lynx populations. Out of 11 measurements compared only ve are signi cantly
different in males and females, respectively. Only one cranial measurement is larger in the
different in males and females, respectively. Only one cranial measurement is larger in the
Czech lynx (Table 2).
Czech lynx (Table 2).
In his papers
In his papers
MIRIĆ (1978, 1981)
MIRIĆ (1978, 1981)
de ned a Eurasian lynx subspecies indigenous to the
de ned a Eurasian lynx subspecies indigenous to the
Balkan peninsula,
Balkan peninsula,
Lynx lynx martinoi
Lynx lynx martinoi
ssp. He based his statement on cranial measurements
ssp. He based his statement on cranial measurements
of three female and one male lynx from this region. The values of the female skulls
of three female and one male lynx from this region. The values of the female skulls
measured by
measured by
MIRIĆ (1974)
MIRIĆ (1974)
did not show any statistically signi cant difference when
did not show any statistically signi cant difference when
compared with female skulls from our study.
compared with female skulls from our study.
MIRIĆ (1978)
MIRIĆ (1978)
measured six measurements
measured six measurements
in only one male skull and all of them were within the interval of two standard deviations
in only one male skull and all of them were within the interval of two standard deviations
of the reintroduced population, meaning that the dimensions of this skull are within the
of the reintroduced population, meaning that the dimensions of this skull are within the
range of 95% of the dimensions of the skulls from the reintroduced lynx. Out of those six
range of 95% of the dimensions of the skulls from the reintroduced lynx. Out of those six
measurements in total four (1, 9, 18, 34b) are within the range of one standard deviation
measurements in total four (1, 9, 18, 34b) are within the range of one standard deviation
of the Croatian population of Eurasian lynx, meaning within 68% of the reintroduced
of the Croatian population of Eurasian lynx, meaning within 68% of the reintroduced
population.
population.
MIRIĆ (1978)
MIRIĆ (1978)
also stated that the body mass of the new subspecies is not
also stated that the body mass of the new subspecies is not
larger than 25 kg. This value is not signi cantly different from the Croatian (21.9 ± 3.9
larger than 25 kg. This value is not signi cantly different from the Croatian (21.9 ± 3.9
kg, range 15.0 - 28.0 kg) or Czech population (21.8 ± 3.6 kg, range 14.0 - 28.0 kg).
kg, range 15.0 - 28.0 kg) or Czech population (21.8 ± 3.6 kg, range 14.0 - 28.0 kg).
Also when de ning this new subspecies
Also when de ning this new subspecies
MIRIĆ (1978)
MIRIĆ (1978)
stated that 30% of the animals
stated that 30% of the animals
from Balkan Peninsula have less visible or have no spots at all on their fur, compared to
from Balkan Peninsula have less visible or have no spots at all on their fur, compared to
populations from Slovakia and the Caucasus mountains where only 10% of lynx have this
populations from Slovakia and the Caucasus mountains where only 10% of lynx have this
kind of fur coloration. It is important to emphasize that only few years earlier the same
kind of fur coloration. It is important to emphasize that only few years earlier the same
author published an article saying that certain cranial measurements have proved to be a
author published an article saying that certain cranial measurements have proved to be a
very reliable indicator for lynx taxonomy, while fur coloration and body dimensions are
very reliable indicator for lynx taxonomy, while fur coloration and body dimensions are
408 Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerč
i
ć et a
l
.: Cran
i
a
l
morp
h
ometry of t
h
e Euras
i
an
l
ynx
(Lynx lynx
Lynx
l
ynx
L.) from Croatia
L.
)
from Croat
i
a
so variable they cannot be used to distinguish lynx species (
so variable they cannot be used to distinguish lynx species (
MIRIĆ, 1974
MIRIĆ, 1974
). In the same
). In the same
paper, based on cranial measurements of two male (one of them damaged and with a large
paper, based on cranial measurements of two male (one of them damaged and with a large
number of measurements missing) and three female lynx skulls,
number of measurements missing) and three female lynx skulls,
MIRIĆ (1974)
MIRIĆ (1974)
concluded
concluded
that the Balkan lynx is completely the same as the European lynx, subspecies L.
that the Balkan lynx is completely the same as the European lynx, subspecies L.
l. lynx
l. lynx
L.
L.
MIRIĆ
MIRIĆ
published the same idea in
published the same idea in
1972
1972
: “Comparing the craniometrical characteristics
: “Comparing the craniometrical characteristics
of lynx from Yugoslavia we have seen that they do not differ from the craniometrical
of lynx from Yugoslavia we have seen that they do not differ from the craniometrical
characteristics of the typical subspecies
characteristics of the typical subspecies
L. lynx lynx.
L. lynx lynx.
”. Even though the number of studied
”. Even though the number of studied
skulls has not increased, but only the number of studied furs for coloration and spots on
skulls has not increased, but only the number of studied furs for coloration and spots on
pelts,
pelts,
MIRIĆ (1978)
MIRIĆ (1978)
de ned a new Eurasian lynx subspecies
de ned a new Eurasian lynx subspecies
Lynx lynx martinoi
Lynx lynx martinoi
ssp. Our
ssp. Our
research established that there is no signi cant difference between cranial measurements
research established that there is no signi cant difference between cranial measurements
of the Balkan (
of the Balkan (
MIRIĆ, 1978
MIRIĆ, 1978
), Croatian (this research) and Czech lynx populations
), Croatian (this research) and Czech lynx populations
(
(
ČERVENÝ and KOUBEK, 2000
ČERVENÝ and KOUBEK, 2000
). Taking this into consideration and also the small number
). Taking this into consideration and also the small number
of skulls
of skulls
MIRIĆ (1978)
MIRIĆ (1978)
studied, it is not justi ed to de ne the Balkan lynx population as
studied, it is not justi ed to de ne the Balkan lynx population as
a separate subspecies.
a separate subspecies.
References
References
ANONYMOUS (1995): Rule on protection of certain mammalian species
ANONYMOUS (1995): Rule on protection of certain mammalian species
(Mammalia)
(Mammalia)
(in
(in
Croatian). Narodne Novine 31/95.
Croatian). Narodne Novine 31/95.
ANDERSEN, T., Ø. WIIG (1984): Growth of the skull of Norwegian lynx. Acta Theriol. 28, 89-
ANDERSEN, T., Ø. WIIG (1984): Growth of the skull of Norwegian lynx. Acta Theriol. 28, 89-
100.
100.
BEGO, F. (2001): Existing on the status and distribution of the Lynx in Albania. Kora Bericht 7,
BEGO, F. (2001): Existing on the status and distribution of the Lynx in Albania. Kora Bericht 7,
18.
18.
BELTRAN, J. F., M. DELIBES (1993): Physical characteristics of Iberian lynxes (
BELTRAN, J. F., M. DELIBES (1993): Physical characteristics of Iberian lynxes (
Lynx pardinus
Lynx pardinus
)
)
from Donana, Southwestern Spain. J. Mammal. 74, 852-862.
from Donana, Southwestern Spain. J. Mammal. 74, 852-862.
BIENIEK, M., M. WOLSAN, H. OKARMA (1998): Historical biogeography of the lynx in Poland.
BIENIEK, M., M. WOLSAN, H. OKARMA (1998): Historical biogeography of the lynx in Poland.
Acta Zool. Cracov. 41, 143-167.
Acta Zool. Cracov. 41, 143-167.
BREITENMOSER, U., C. BREITENMOSER - WÜRSTEN, S. CAPT (1998): Re-introduction and
BREITENMOSER, U., C. BREITENMOSER - WÜRSTEN, S. CAPT (1998): Re-introduction and
present status of lynx (
present status of lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
) in Switzerland. Hystrix 10, 17-30.
) in Switzerland. Hystrix 10, 17-30.
BREITENMOSER-WÜRSTEN, C., U. BREITENMOSER (2001): Thy lynx in the Balkans - a
BREITENMOSER-WÜRSTEN, C., U. BREITENMOSER (2001): Thy lynx in the Balkans - a
summary of present knowledge. Kora Bericht 7, 32-35.
summary of present knowledge. Kora Bericht 7, 32-35.
CROWE, D.M. (1972): The presence of annuli in bobcat tooth cementum layers. J. Wildl. Manage.
CROWE, D.M. (1972): The presence of annuli in bobcat tooth cementum layers. J. Wildl. Manage.
36, 1330-1332.
36, 1330-1332.
ČERVENÝ, J., P. KOUBEK (2000): Variabilty of body and skull dimensions of the lynx (
ČERVENÝ, J., P. KOUBEK (2000): Variabilty of body and skull dimensions of the lynx (
Lynx
Lynx
lynx
lynx
) in the Czech Republic. Lynx (Praha) 31, 5-12.
) in the Czech Republic. Lynx (Praha) 31, 5-12.
ČOP, J. (1988): Ris
ČOP, J. (1988): Ris
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
Linnaeus, 1758. In: Zveri II (Medvedi- Ursidae, Psi - Canidae,
Linnaeus, 1758. In: Zveri II (Medvedi- Ursidae, Psi - Canidae,
Mačke - Felidae), (Kryštufek B., A Brancelj, B. Krže, J. Čop, Eds.), Lovska zveza Slovenije,
Mačke - Felidae), (Kryštufek B., A Brancelj, B. Krže, J. Čop, Eds.), Lovska zveza Slovenije,
Ljubljana, 233-292.
Ljubljana, 233-292.
FRKOVIĆ, A. (2001): Lynx (
FRKOVIĆ, A. (2001): Lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.
L.
)
)
in Croatia - reintroduction, hunting and population size
in Croatia - reintroduction, hunting and population size
(1974-2000) (in Croatian). Šumarski list 11-12, 625-634.
(1974-2000) (in Croatian). Šumarski list 11-12, 625-634.
409
GARCÍA-PEREA, R., J. GISBERT, F. PALACIOS (1985): Review of the biometrical and
GARCÍA-PEREA, R., J. GISBERT, F. PALACIOS (1985): Review of the biometrical and
morphological features of the skull of the Iberian lynx,
morphological features of the skull of the Iberian lynx,
Lynx pardina
Lynx pardina
(Temminck, 1824).
(Temminck, 1824).
Säugetierkundl. Mitt. 32, 249-259.
Säugetierkundl. Mitt. 32, 249-259.
GARCÍA-PEREA, R. (1991): Variabilidad morfologica del genero Lynx Kerr, 1792 (
GARCÍA-PEREA, R. (1991): Variabilidad morfologica del genero Lynx Kerr, 1792 (
Carnivore,
Carnivore,
Felidae
Felidae
) (Morphological variability of genus Lynx Kerr 1792 (
) (Morphological variability of genus Lynx Kerr 1792 (
Carnivore, Felidae
Carnivore, Felidae
)). Madrid:
)). Madrid:
University of Complutense.
University of Complutense.
GOMERČIĆ, T., G. GUŽVICA, M. ĐURAS GOMERČIĆ, A. FRKOVIĆ, D. PAVLOVIĆ,
GOMERČIĆ, T., G. GUŽVICA, M. ĐURAS GOMERČIĆ, A. FRKOVIĆ, D. PAVLOVIĆ,
J. KUSAK, M. SINDIČIĆ, Đ. HUBER (2009): Variation in teeth number, teeth and skull
J. KUSAK, M. SINDIČIĆ, Đ. HUBER (2009): Variation in teeth number, teeth and skull
disorders in Eurasian lynx,
disorders in Eurasian lynx,
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
from Croatia. Folia Zoologica 58, 57-65.
from Croatia. Folia Zoologica 58, 57-65.
HRISTOVSKI, M. (2001): On the status of the Balkan lynx in the Former Yugoslav Republic of
HRISTOVSKI, M. (2001): On the status of the Balkan lynx in the Former Yugoslav Republic of
Macedonia. Kora Bericht 7, 8-11.
Macedonia. Kora Bericht 7, 8-11.
KVAM, T. (1983): Age determination in European lynx
KVAM, T. (1983): Age determination in European lynx
Lynx lynx lynx
Lynx lynx lynx
(L.) based on cranial
(L.) based on cranial
development. Fauna norv. Ser. A. 4, 31-36.
development. Fauna norv. Ser. A. 4, 31-36.
KVAM, T. (1984): Age determination in European lynx
KVAM, T. (1984): Age determination in European lynx
Lynx l. lynx
Lynx l. lynx
by incremental lines in tooth
by incremental lines in tooth
cementum. Acta Zool. Fennica 171, 221-223.
cementum. Acta Zool. Fennica 171, 221-223.
MAJIĆ-SKRBINŠEK, A. (2004): Lynx Management Plan for Republic Croatia. Ministarstvo
MAJIĆ-SKRBINŠEK, A. (2004): Lynx Management Plan for Republic Croatia. Ministarstvo
zaštite okoliša i prostornog uređenja Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb.
zaštite okoliša i prostornog uređenja Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb.
MIRIĆ, Đ. (1972): Morphometrical characteristics of lynx from Yugoslavia (in Serbian). Simpozijum
MIRIĆ, Đ. (1972): Morphometrical characteristics of lynx from Yugoslavia (in Serbian). Simpozijum
o lovstvu. Šumarski fakultet, Beograd i Institut za šumarstvo i drvnu industriju, Beograd.
o lovstvu. Šumarski fakultet, Beograd i Institut za šumarstvo i drvnu industriju, Beograd.
MIRIĆ, Đ. (1974): Lynx (
MIRIĆ, Đ. (1974): Lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L., 1758) distribution on Balkan Pennisula in history and today
L., 1758) distribution on Balkan Pennisula in history and today
(in Serbian). Glasnik prirodnjačkog muzeja 29, 51-150.
(in Serbian). Glasnik prirodnjačkog muzeja 29, 51-150.
MIRIĆ, Đ. (1978):
MIRIĆ, Đ. (1978):
Lynx lynx martinoi
Lynx lynx martinoi
ssp (Carnivora, Mammalia) new lynx subspecies from
ssp (Carnivora, Mammalia) new lynx subspecies from
Balkan Peninsula (in Serbian). Glasnik prirodnjačkog muzeja 33, 29-36.
Balkan Peninsula (in Serbian). Glasnik prirodnjačkog muzeja 33, 29-36.
MIRIĆ, Đ. (1981): Balkan lynx populations (in Serbian). Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti.
MIRIĆ, Đ. (1981): Balkan lynx populations (in Serbian). Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti.
Beograd.
Beograd.
MIRIĆ, Đ., M. PAUNOVIĆ (1992): A new record of
MIRIĆ, Đ., M. PAUNOVIĆ (1992): A new record of
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
(Linnaeus 1758) (Felidae, Carnivora)
(Linnaeus 1758) (Felidae, Carnivora)
in east Serbia. Glasnik prirodnjačkog muzeja u Beogradu 47, 171-174.
in east Serbia. Glasnik prirodnjačkog muzeja u Beogradu 47, 171-174.
PANAYOTOPOULOU, M. (2001): Historical distribution and present status of the lynx in Greece.
PANAYOTOPOULOU, M. (2001): Historical distribution and present status of the lynx in Greece.
Kora Bericht 7, 28-31.
Kora Bericht 7, 28-31.
PAUNOVIĆ, M., M. MILENKOVIĆ, C. IVANOVIĆ-VLAHOVIĆ (2001): The lynx populations
PAUNOVIĆ, M., M. MILENKOVIĆ, C. IVANOVIĆ-VLAHOVIĆ (2001): The lynx populations
in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Kora Bericht 7, 12-17.
in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Kora Bericht 7, 12-17.
PERTOLDI, C., R. GARCIA-PEREA, J. A. GODOY, M. DELIBES, V. LOESCHCKE (2006):
PERTOLDI, C., R. GARCIA-PEREA, J. A. GODOY, M. DELIBES, V. LOESCHCKE (2006):
Morphological consequences of range fragmentation and population decline on the endangered
Morphological consequences of range fragmentation and population decline on the endangered
Iberian lynx (
Iberian lynx (
Lynx pardinus
Lynx pardinus
). J. Zool. 268, 73-86.
). J. Zool. 268, 73-86.
SAUNDERS, J. K. (1964): Physical characteristics of the Newfoundland lynx. J. Mammal. 45,
SAUNDERS, J. K. (1964): Physical characteristics of the Newfoundland lynx. J. Mammal. 45,
36-47.
36-47.
SOLDO, V. (2001): The lynx in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Kora Bericht 7, 6-7.
SOLDO, V. (2001): The lynx in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Kora Bericht 7, 6-7.
SOVILJ, Đ. (2008): Should lynx be hunted? (in Croatian). Dobra kob 77, 26-27.
SOVILJ, Đ. (2008): Should lynx be hunted? (in Croatian). Dobra kob 77, 26-27.
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
410
SPASSOV, N., K. GEORGIEV, G. SPIRIDONOV (2001): Brief notes on the status and problems
SPASSOV, N., K. GEORGIEV, G. SPIRIDONOV (2001): Brief notes on the status and problems
of the lynx in Bulgaria. Kora Bericht 7, 26-27.
of the lynx in Bulgaria. Kora Bericht 7, 26-27.
VON DEN DRIESCH, A. (1976): Measurements of the cranium of felis. A guide to the measurement
VON DEN DRIESCH, A. (1976): Measurements of the cranium of felis. A guide to the measurement
of animal bones from archeological sites. Bull. Peabody Mus. 1, 47-49.
of animal bones from archeological sites. Bull. Peabody Mus. 1, 47-49.
WERDELIN, L. (1981): The evolution of lynxes. Ann. Zool. Fennici 18, 37-71.
WERDELIN, L. (1981): The evolution of lynxes. Ann. Zool. Fennici 18, 37-71.
WIIG, Ř., T. ANDERSEN (1986): Sexual size dimorphism in the skull of Norwegian lynx. Acta
WIIG, Ř., T. ANDERSEN (1986): Sexual size dimorphism in the skull of Norwegian lynx. Acta
Theriol. 31, 147-155.
Theriol. 31, 147-155.
WIIG, Ř., T. ANDERSEN (1988): Non-metrical variation in the skull of Norwegian lynx. Acta
WIIG, Ř., T. ANDERSEN (1988): Non-metrical variation in the skull of Norwegian lynx. Acta
Theriol. 33, 3-19.
Theriol. 33, 3-19.
ZLATANOVA, D., P. TZVETKOVSKI, E. TZINGARSKA-SEDEFCHEVA (2001): The lynx in
ZLATANOVA, D., P. TZVETKOVSKI, E. TZINGARSKA-SEDEFCHEVA (2001): The lynx in
Bulgaria: Present conservation status and future prospects. Kora Bericht 7, 19-23.
Bulgaria: Present conservation status and future prospects. Kora Bericht 7, 19-23.
GOMERČIĆ, T., M. SINDIČIĆ, M. ĐURAS GOMERČIĆ, G. GUŽVICA, A.
GOMERČIĆ, T., M. SINDIČIĆ, M. ĐURAS GOMERČIĆ, G. GUŽVICA, A.
FRKOVIĆ, D. PAVLOVIĆ, J. KUSAK, A. GALOV, Đ. HUBER
FRKOVIĆ, D. PAVLOVIĆ, J. KUSAK, A. GALOV, Đ. HUBER
: Kraniometrijske
: Kraniometrijske
osobitosti euroazijskoga risa (
osobitosti euroazijskoga risa (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L
L
.
.
) iz
) iz
Hrvatske. Vet. arhiv 80, 393-410,
Hrvatske. Vet. arhiv 80, 393-410,
2010.
2010.
SAŽETAK
SAŽETAK
Posljednji primjerci autohtonog euroazijskog risa (
Posljednji primjerci autohtonog euroazijskog risa (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
) u Hrvatskoj istrijebljeni su oko 1903. godine
) u Hrvatskoj istrijebljeni su oko 1903. godine
na području Gorskog kotara. Ris se u Hrvatsku vratio nakon reintrodukcije šest životinja iz Slovačke u Sloveniju
na području Gorskog kotara. Ris se u Hrvatsku vratio nakon reintrodukcije šest životinja iz Slovačke u Sloveniju
1973. godine. Ris je danas u Hrvatskoj ugrožena, zakonom zaštićena vrsta. Kranijalna morfometrija rabljena
1973. godine. Ris je danas u Hrvatskoj ugrožena, zakonom zaštićena vrsta. Kranijalna morfometrija rabljena
je u analizi 58 lubanja risova iz reintroducirane populacije, s ciljem određivanja geografskih razlika, spolnog
je u analizi 58 lubanja risova iz reintroducirane populacije, s ciljem određivanja geografskih razlika, spolnog
dimorfizma i spolno vezanih značajki lubanje. Ukupno je 85 mjera izmjereno na svakoj lubanji. Mužjaci su bili
dimorfizma i spolno vezanih značajki lubanje. Ukupno je 85 mjera izmjereno na svakoj lubanji. Mužjaci su bili
značajno veći u 39 od 85 mjera lubanje, dok je samo jedna mjera, najmanja širina lubanje aboralno od jagodičnih
značajno veći u 39 od 85 mjera lubanje, dok je samo jedna mjera, najmanja širina lubanje aboralno od jagodičnih
izdanaka čeonih kostiju, veća u ženki nego u mužjaka. Naše istraživanje pokazuje da je ris iz Hrvatske sličniji
izdanaka čeonih kostiju, veća u ženki nego u mužjaka. Naše istraživanje pokazuje da je ris iz Hrvatske sličniji
risu iz Češke nego onima iz Norveške. Nisu pronađeni dokazi o postojanju razlika u mjerama lubanje između
risu iz Češke nego onima iz Norveške. Nisu pronađeni dokazi o postojanju razlika u mjerama lubanje između
reintroducirane populacije risa u Hrvatskoj i autohtone balkanske populacije, te stoga ne postoje temelji za
reintroducirane populacije risa u Hrvatskoj i autohtone balkanske populacije, te stoga ne postoje temelji za
definiranje balkanskog risa kao odvojene podvrste,
definiranje balkanskog risa kao odvojene podvrste,
Lynx lynx martinoi
Lynx lynx martinoi
ssp.
ssp.
Ključne riječi:
Ključne riječi:
kraniometrija, ris,
kraniometrija, ris,
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
, Hrvatska
, Hrvatska
Received: 7 April 2009
Accepted: 22 December 2009
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
T. Gomerčić et al.: Cranial morphometry of the Eurasian lynx (
Lynx lynx
Lynx lynx
L.) from Croatia
L.) from Croatia
Vet. arhiv 80 (3), 393-410, 2010
... Cranial morphometry is crucial for taxonomy and has a major impact on the management and maintenance of the species. Several studies have been conducted regarding the craniometrics of carnivores, including dog (Onar, 1999;Ilgun et al., 2021), wolf (Okarma and Buchalczyk, 1993;Milenković et al., 2010;Khosravi et al., 2012;Gürbüz et al., 2020), fox (Gomes and Valente, 2016;Munkhzull et al., 2018;Magalhães et al., 2019), golden jackal (Monfared, 2013;Rezić et al, 2017) and lynx (Gomerčić et al., 2010;Dayan et al., 2017). Most of these studies include the mandible as the lower part of the facial skeleton. ...
... The total length of the red fox mandible was 9.6 ± 3.3 cm and corsac fox 9.1 ± 0.8 cm according to Munkzul et al. (2018), in the hoary fox 99.67 ± 1.14 mm according to Magalhaes et al. (2019), in golden jackals 11.2 ± 3.46 cm according to Monfared (2013). In other carnivores such as the lynx, the total length of the mandible was 102.6±5.2 mm according to Gomerčić (2010), 93.45 ± 2.98 mm according to Dayan et al. (2017) and in the wolf 190.4 ± 7.7 mm according to Okarma and Buchalczyk (1993). Our study revealed a significant difference between the total length of the fox (102.1 ± 4.8 mm) and jackal (117.7 ± 2.4 mm) mandibles, but this was similar to previous studies. ...
... Our study revealed a significant difference between the total length of the fox (102.1 ± 4.8 mm) and jackal (117.7 ± 2.4 mm) mandibles, but this was similar to previous studies. Also, the total height of the vertical ramus was reported in two fox species as 3.7 ± 0.1 cm and 3.2 ± 0.2 cm (Munkhzull et al., 2018) in the golden jackal as 6.0 ± 0.58 cm (Monfared, 2013), in the lynx as 38.92 ± 1.63 mm, 44.1 ± 3.2 mm, (Gomerčić et al., 2010;Dayan et al., 2017) and in the wolf as 76.3 ± 3.8 mm (Okarma and Buchalczyk, 1993). The present study revealed similar values as in foxes from Mongolia (35.6 ± 2.2 mm), while the total height for the jackal was 42.6 ± 1.4 mm, which was significantly smaller compared with the study of jackals from Iran. ...
... lynx dinniki) in Turkey. Although the separation into these subspecies remains controversial (29,30) and genetic differences among subspecies and populations may be due to epigenetic changes driven by local environmental characteristics, the existence of differences are undisputable (27,28) and associated with varying phenotype characteristics, such as body size and weight, coat pattern and skull shape, as well as varying life history traits (28,31,32). ...
Article
Full-text available
The Eurasian lynx (subspecies Lynx lynx carpathicus ) was reintroduced to Switzerland in the 1970's. Health monitoring of the reintroduced population started in the late 1980's. Since then, six lynx have been found affected by a myocardial disease. The earliest case was an animal that died after a field anesthesia. Two lynx were found dead, two were euthanized/culled because of disease signs, and one was hit by car. Two had a heart murmur at clinical examination. At necropsy, the first animal showed only lung edema but the other five had cardiomegaly associated with myocardial fibrosis. Three had multisystemic effusions. Histological examination of all six lynx showed mild to severe, multifocal, myocardial interstitial and perivascular fibrosis along with multifocal myocyte degeneration and loss, and replacement fibrosis. Moderate to severe multifocal arteriosclerosis with associated luminal stenosis of the small and medium-sized intramural coronary arteries and the presence of Anitschkow cells was also observed. The heart lesions may have led to sudden death in the first case and to a chronic right-sided heart failure in the remaining. None of the lynx showed lesions or signs suggestive of an acute or subacute infection. Given the common geographic origin of these animals and the severe loss of heterozygocity in this population, a genetic origin of the disease is hypothesized.
... Donadio and Buskirk (2006) suggest that, while other factors are influential, body size is pivotal in determining rates of interspecific killing, with killing highest when body size difference is intermediate (41.4 -88.3 %). The size differences between Croatian foxes Vulpes vulpes (6-8kg; (Janicki et al. 2007)) and wolves, Canis lupus (male ≈ 35kg, female ≈ 29kg; (Huber et al. 2002b)) or lynx, Lynx lynx (male ≈ 21.9kg, female ≈ 18.4kg; (Gomerčić et al. 2010)) are considered intermediate. Wolf and lynx morphology also suggests that attack or harassment of foxes is of low risk, so direct killing might be expected (Donadio & Buskirk 2006). ...
Thesis
Full-text available
This thesis fills knowledge gaps regarding spatio-temporal interactions between sympatric carnivores, mesopredator risk mitigation behaviour, and thus, the mechanisms that enable coexistence. In the Anthropocene biodiversity crisis, discerning how and when diversity is maintained is critical. Employing a robust multi-method approach, a model study system was used to examine the top-down effects of wolves, Canis lupus and Eurasian lynx, Lynx lynx, upon red fox, Vulpes vulpes in Plitvice Lakes National Park, Croatia. Chapter Two utilises novel foraging experiments, combining camera traps with the giving-up density (GUD) framework. Foxes responded to wolf urine by taking less food, spending less time at patches, leaving at higher quitting harvest rates, and adjusting their behaviour when at patches, spending less time foraging and more time being vigilant and sniffing the ground. Chapter Three examines spatial relationships using occupancy modelling. Foxes were not spatially excluded by large carnivores, but were in fact attracted to them (or at least the same conditions) and more detectable in their presence. The positive association was most strongly related to lynx, however, conversely, foxes responded elusively towards human activity. Chapter Four examines temporal relationships using kernel density estimates, circular statistics and nocturnality risk ratios. Fox activity overlapped with other carnivores but avoided peak activity periods, having significantly different record distributions. Foxes were more nocturnal in higher intensity large carnivore presence, seemingly using the cover of darkness to remain safe. High human activity however mediated this interaction, decreasing its strength. Subtle temporal avoidance and fine-scale spatio-temporal risk mitigation strategies can enable mesopredator access to resources and predator coexistence in the presence of intraguild aggression. Where food subsidies are absent, humans may increase mesopredator elusiveness but may also offer some level of temporal shielding from large carnivores. Protected area management should consider ecological baselines and the effects of human disturbance.
Article
Full-text available
In Russian: Были проведены морфометрические исследования 27 черепов четырех подвидов обыкновенной рыси (Lynx lynx Linnaeus, 1758): европейской (L. l. lynx L., 1758) (n = 2), байкальской (L. l. kozlovi Fetisov, 1950) (n = 2), алтайской (L. l. wardi Lydekker, 1904) (n = 5) и туркестанской (L. l. isabellina Blyth, 1847) (n = 16) из девяти различных популяций. В результате возрастного анализа, из рассмотренных черепов 3 черепа были отнесены к группе сеголеток, 8 – к молодой группе (до 2-3 лет), 16 – к взрослой группе. При статистической обработке данных были использованы 10 переменных для сравнения двух полов. Черепа сеголеток для этого не использовались ввиду их недоразвитости. Применялся t-критерий Стьюдента для сравнения средних значений переменных, обработанные данные являются статистически значимыми при < 0.05. Габаритные размеры черепов различались, и самцы были сравнительно крупнее самок. Общая длина черепа самцов и самок, в среднем, была 153,8 мм и 145,6 мм, соответственно, в то время как скуловая ширина черепа у самцов, в среднем, была 108,6 мм, а у самок – 102,8 мм. Схожие отличия по размерам отмечены и по другим 8 переменным. Отмечена значительная вариация размеров черепов рысей из различных популяций, что, предположительно, связано с размерами их тела. Так, черепа европейской и алтайской рысей были несколько больше черепов туркестанской. В дальнейшем планируется рассмотреть больше черепов из других популяций и использовать большее количество показателей черепов для изучения отличий между популяциями и подвидами. In English: Twenty-seven skulls of four subspecies of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx Linnaeus, 1758): European (L. l. lynx L., 1758) (n = 2), Baikal (L. l. kozlovi Fetisov, 1950) (n = 2), Altai (L. l. wardi Lydekker, 1904) (n = 5) and Turkestan (L. l. isabellina Blyth, 1847) (n = 16) lynxes from nine different populations were studied. As a result of age analysis, among the skulls obtained, three were classified as juveniles, eight as subadult (up to 2-3 years), and 16 as adults. Ten variables were examined in the statistical data processing to compare the two sexes. The skulls of juveniles were not considered for statistical treatment due to their underdevelopment. We used Student t-test for comparing the means of variables; the data analyzed were statistically significant at < 0.05. The overall dimensions of the skulls varied, and the males were comparatively larger than the females. The total length of the skull of males and females averaged 153.8 mm and 145.6 mm, respectively, while the zygomatic width of the skull in males averaged 108.6 mm and in females 102.8 mm. Similar differences in size were noted for the other 8 variables. A significant variation in the lynxes’ skulls size from different populations was noteworthy, which is presumably related to their body sizes. Thus, the skulls of the European and Altai lynx were larger than the skulls of the Turkestan to some degree. In the near future, we will need to look at more skulls from other populations and use more skull variables to study differences between populations and subspecies.
Article
Full-text available
The observation of pelvic anomalies in two Eurasian lynx (subspecies Lynx lynx carpathicus) from a population reintroduced to Switzerland raised the question of the frequency of such anomalies, but no anatomical reference values were available for comparison. This study aimed at providing baseline data on the pelvic morphology of Carpathian lynx from Switzerland, and at detecting potential pelvic anomalies. Measurements of 10 pelvic parameters were performed on the radiographs of 56 lynx taken from 1997–2015. Two ratios (vertical diameter/acetabula; sagittal diameter/transversal diameter) and two areas (pelvic outlet and inlet) were calculated to describe pelvic shape. The results showed that the Eurasian lynx has a mesatipellic pelvis, with a pelvic length corresponding to approximatively 20% of the body length. We found growth-related pelvis size differences among age classes and evidence of sexual dimorphism in adults: two parameters reflecting pelvic width were larger in females, likely to meet the physiological requirements of parturition. By contrast, pelvis length, conjugata vera, diagonal conjugata, sagittal diameter, and tendentially also vertical diameter, were larger in males, in agreement with their larger body size. Outliers were found in five individuals but apparently without clinical significance. Extreme values were likely due to inter-individual differences and the limited sample size rather than to possible congenital or developmental pathological morphology of the pelvic cavity. We present baseline data of the pelvic morphology, including growth and sexual dimorphism, which may be useful for health monitoring and for determination of age and sex in skeletal remains of Carpathian lynx.
Article
The pardel lynx Lynx pardinus is today restricted to small populations living in southern Iberian Peninsula. However, this endangered species was widely spread throughout Iberia until historical times and is currently the subject of intense conservation programs. Paleontological data suggest that its past geographical range was much wider, including also southern France and northern Italy. Here, we report exceptionally preserved fossil remains of L. pardinus from the Late Pleistocene (about 40 0 000 years) of Ingarano (Italy), which represent the largest sample of fossil lynx currently known in Europe. This new evidence allows (1) to revise the taxonomy of European fossil lynxes, (2) to extend far southeast the paleobiogeographical distribution of L. pardinus, and (3) to offer new insights on the evolutionary history (e.g., relationships with other extinct and extant lynx species) and paleobiology (e.g., intraspecific variation, body mass) of this iconic European felid.
Article
The lynx currently occurs in three reintroduced populations in Germany: in eastern Bavaria, in the Harz Mountains and in the Palatinate Forest. Status assessment is performed according to monitoring standards which were agreed upon nationwide, and the status found is summarised in yearly distribution maps based on a 10 km × 10 km EEA reference grid. The lynx population in Bavaria exists since the 1990s, but exhibits only very slow expansion, mainly due to a high level of illegal killing. The population in the Harz Mountains is spreading and individual males have migrated to Brandenburg and Bavaria. In the Palatinate Forest a reintroduction programme started in 2015; in the meantime, wild-born lynx kittens are documented regularly. In Baden-Wuerttemberg there has been consistent evidence of individual male lynx which immigrated mainly from Switzerland. Immigration by females is not very likely in view of habitat fragmentation. To secure the long-term viability of the lynx in Germany the existing lynx populations need to be connected on a Central European scale. For this purpose, the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) commissioned a conceptual framework coordinated nationwide, which will outline suitable measures to reach favourable conservation status.
Article
Full-text available
In the spring of 2017, a right mandibula of a medium-sized felid was found on the North Sea beach of Texel, The Netherlands. Based on its morphology and size, the mandibula fragment, described in this article, is attributed to Lynx lynx. The fragment is the first discovery of a lynx from the Texel beach and possibly the first jaw fragment of a lynx from the Netherlands. Fossil lynx finds from northwestern Europe are rare, specifically the Netherlands. This is probably because lynxes live a solitary life in large habitats and because they migrated frequently during the Pliocene and Pleistocene. Besides that, Lynx lynx occurrences in The Netherlands were limited to a relatively short period. This article also describes the taxonomy and occurrence of current living species of lynxes.
Article
Full-text available
Two skulls of zoo lynxes and one lynx skull with unknown origin have been studied. One of the lynx was male and seven years and six months old, imported from Russia and lived in the zoo in Stara Zagora. The second one was two years and six months old, imported from Czech Republic. The third lynx was from osteological collection and was with unknown origin. A comparative morphological investigation was conducted, using native and radiological study. After the osteological treatment of one skull, it was found that there was a bone defect in the caudal part of the frontal bones, which motivated our study. According to us, it was a bone anomaly, resulted by the inbreeding of the animal, often leading to the occasional appearance of asymptomatic bone defects. We suggest the origin of the lynxes to be studied carefully in their reintroduction in order to prevent the displacement of inbreeding animals. Thus, we propose that it is better to be studied the lynx ancestor for future reintroductions of the animal, which is of great importance for its ecology and surviving.
Article
Full-text available
The earliest certain finds of the lynx Lynx lynx (Linné, 1758) in Poland are those of the mid-Holocene (Neolithic) age. Until the Middle Ages the species was apparently widely distributed throughout the territory. Before the turn of the eighteenth century it was extinct west of the river Vistula. Its range was further diminishing from the west during the first three quarters of the nineteenth century, so that the northeastern and Carpathian populations finally became isolated from each other by the half of that century. Within the first four decades of the twentieth century the species reached its minimal distribution in Poland, being virtually restricted to the Białowieża Primeval Forest and some parts of the Carpathian Forest. During the period from the 1940s to the early 1980s the lynx was generally expanding in Poland, both in range and likely in numbers, so that it was represented by established populations in most of larger forest complexes in the northeast and in the Carpathians at the end of that interval. Since that time both the northeastern and Carpathian populations have been declining in distribution and numbers, vanishing from several forest complexes in the west of their former range.
Article
Full-text available
The last specimens of indigenous Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Croatia were exterminated around year 1903. Lynx dispersed back to Croatia after six animals were reintroduced to Slovenia from Slovakia in 1973. Considering the consequences of founder effect, genetic drift and expected high level of homozygosity, the goal of this paper was to determine variation in teeth number, teeth and skull disorders in Croatian lynx. It should also determine whether there has been a change in frequency of occurrence of developmental anomalies in relation to the population it originates from and in relation to other lynx populations. We studied 58 lynx skulls originating from the reintroduced lynx population. Changes on teeth and skull were found on 23 skulls (39.7%): supernumerary maxillary second premolar P 3 (9 skulls, 15.5%), supernumerary mandibular second molar M 2 (3 skulls, 5.2%), congenitally absent maxillary incisor (3 skulls, 6.9%), extra tooth between maxillary third incisor I 3 and canine (1 skull, 1.7%) and acquired disorders of teeth and skull (9, 15.5%).
Article
Full-text available
The variation of 53 non-metrical variants in the skull of 50 male and 50 female Norwegian lunx Lynx lynx (Linnaeus, 1758) were examined. The variants are described in detail, and the range of the variation of each variant is tabulated
Article
Full-text available
Wiig 0. Andersen T., 1986: Sexual size dimorphism in the skull of Norwegian lynx. Acta theriol., 31, 12: 147—155 [With 2 Tables & 2 Figs.] Sexual size dimorphism in 16 skull dimensions of Norwegian lynx Lynx lynx (Linnaeus, 1758) aged between 17 and 60 months was studied. The measurements were adjusted for ontogenetic variation by regression to the mean age of the total sample (33.9 months). In 15 of the 16 measurements, the males were significantly larger than the females (p in most of the dimensions measured, ranging from 4% (condyl breadth) to 10% (mandible height); the postorbital constriction was 2% narrower in the males. The sexual dimorphism was found to be functionally related to the feeding apparatus. [Dept. of Systematic Zoology, Zoological Museum, Univ. of Bergen, N — 5000 Bergen, Norway]
Article
Full-text available
Age related varation in 16 skull dimensions of male and female lynx Lynx lynx (Linnaeus, 1758) recorded, based on a collection of 281 specimens (156 males and 125 females) caught in different parts of Norway during the ten year period 1960 to 1969. Three main growth patterns were recognized: most skull dimensions were found to increase with age, while the lengths of the carnassials were unrelated to age and the breadth of the postorbital constriction decreased with age.
Article
Lynx were age determined by counts of dark staining incremental lines in canine root cementum. -from Author
Article
Standard measurements, weights and selected skull measurements for Newfoundland lynx (Lynx canadensis subsolanus Bangs) are presented and discussed briefly. Parturient and two-month-old kittens are described. Age criteria based on skeletal and skull development are proposed for lynx up to two years of age.
Article
A technique is described for demonstrating annuli in the tooth cementum layer of bobcats (Lynx rufus). These annuli are readily identifiable and suggest a method for determining the ages of individual animals.