... This leads to two major insights: a) when which debiasing technique may make sense in a decision process, and b) potential gaps in research and communication of research results versus practice. (Koriat et al., 1980) • Hindsight, logical problem solving, social judgement, availability, salience (Lord et al., 1984) • Anchoring (Mussweiler et al., 2000) • Hindsight (Slovic & Fischhoff, 1977;Soll et al., 2015) • Narrow option generation (Keeney, 2012) • Opportunity cost neglect (Frederick et al., 2009) • Likelihood assessments (Heiman, 1990;Koonce, 1992) • Confirmation bias (Kray & Galinsky, 2003) • Functional fixedness (Galinsky & Moskowitz, 2000a) • Framing, problematic valuation effects, attitudedecision gap, memory/recall biases (Payne et al., 1999) • Narrow option generation (Montibeller & Winterfeldt, 2015) • Confirmation bias, availability, self-serving biases (Babcock et al., 1997) • Overconfidence, planning illusion, illusion of control (Veinott et al., 2010) • Judgmental biases, control illusion, hindsight, anxiety based biases, planning fallacy (Kaufmann et al., 2010) • Association-based biases (Arkes, 1991) • (Schwenk & Cosier, 1993;Schwenk & Valacich, 1994) • Confirmation bias, narrow option generation (Schweiger et al., 1989) • Availability, confirmation bias, planning fallacy, information neglect (Herbert & Estes, 1977) • Judgmental biases, planning biases (Cosier, 1978) Accountability, secondorder judgement ...