A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
\\server05\productn\T\THE\26-1-2\THE1210.txt unknown Seq: 1 26-FEB-07 9:25
ARTICLES
The Philosophical Roots of Western and Eastern
Conceptions of Creativity
Weihua Niu
Pace University
Robert J. Sternberg
Tufts University
Abstract
This essay reviews the philosophical roots and the devel-
opment of the concept of creativity in the West and East.
In particular, two conceptions of creativity that originated
in the West – divinely inspired creativity and individual
creativity—are discussed and compared to the two East-
ern conceptions of creativity that are rooted in ancient
Chinese philosophical thought — natural and individual
creativity. Both Western and Eastern conceptions of indi-
vidual creativity come from a theistic or cosmic tradition
of either divinely inspired or natural creativity. However,
a defining feature of the Western concept of creativity—
novelty—is not necessarily embraced by ancient Chinese
concepts of creativity, but does exist in both modern
Eastern conceptions. Reasons for cultural differences are
explored and discussed.
The influence of culture on people’s conceptions of creativity has
been one of the most exciting topics in the recent literature on creativ-
ity. It has attracted the interest of many psychologists (e.g., Lubart,
1999; Niu & Sternberg, 2002; Lau, Hui & Ng, 2004; Rudowicz & Hui,
1997; Rudowicz & Yue, 2000). A review of contemporary research has
shown that people from the East and West hold similar, yet not identi-
cal conceptions of creativity. In general, Easterners are more likely to
view creativity as having social and moral values, and as making a con-
nection between the new and the old. Their Western counterparts
focus more on some special individual characteristics in understanding
the concept of creativity (Niu & Sternberg, 2002).
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.