ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

This study explores the degree to which students' understanding, or knowledge, may deteriorate over time. Our specific focus was examining the importance of course sequencing in a curriculum. We measured student performance in quantitative business courses and found that, over time, the correlation between students' performance in those courses declined significantly. We further found that that decline was not linear.
Journal of College Teaching & Learning August 2005 Volume 2, Number 8
25
Relationship of Time and Learning Retention
Felix U. Kamuche, (Email: fkamuche@morehouse.edu), Morehouse College
Robert E. Ledman, Morehouse College
ABSTRACT
This study explores the degree to which students’ understanding, or knowledge, may deteriorate over
time. Our specific focus was examining the importance of course sequencing in a curriculum. We
measured student performance in quantitative business courses and found that, over time, the
correlation between students’ performance in those courses declined significantly. We further found
that that decline was not linear.
INTRODUCTION
ny college professor who teaches junior or senior level courses has probably wondered if his or her
students learned anything in prerequisite courses because they seem to not know some fundamental
concepts. The concept of prerequisites is based on the premise that the learning of a subject is
cumulative over several courses and one has to learn certain concepts before learning others. For instance, we do not
expect a student to be able to successfully complete an advanced accounting course if he or she has never been
exposed to basic accounting principles. This study focuses on assessing the extent to which the time between
sequential courses may contribute to the loss of learning. Bahrick (1979) suggests that students do not retain the
information acquired in a class for long after an exam. Higbee (1977) echoes that sentiment. More recent studies,
however, show that although some information is forgotten (Conway, Cohen, & Stanhope, 1991; Semb, Ellis, &
Aranjo, 1993), the retention loss is not as great as expected (Cooper and Greiner, 1971; Semb, Ellis, & Montague,
1990). Wetzel, Konoske, & Montague, (1983), Bahrick, (1984), and Bahrick and Hall (1991) found that retention can
last up to fifty years.
The studies of retention have explored, at least somewhat, whether retention differs for different types of
knowledge. Semb, Ellis, and Aranjo (1993) define four types of knowledgerecall, recognition, comprehension, and
cognition. In their study, retention of recall knowledge was significantly lower than the other three. Semb and Ellis
(1994) argue that there are two dimensions of the retention interval that can affect retentionlength, and what
occurred during the interval. With regards to the length of the interval, there are consistent findings that the amount
retained declines in a non-linear manner (Bahrick, 1984; Bahrick and Hall, 1991; Glasnapp, Poggio & Ory, 1978).
Farr (1987) suggests that the degree of original learning is the most important variable to long-term retention.
Bahrick and Hall (1991), in a study of Spanish and mathematics students, found a strong correlation between the level
of original learning and long-term retention. Specifically they studied the relationship between the number and level
of courses completed and retention. The students who completed more and higher level courses retained more. The
study reported here attempts to confirm this relationship by examining the correlation between a student’s grade in
one course and the student’s grade in the subsequent related course.
HYPOTHESES
We hypothesized that the grades of students who take the two courses with a shorter time between them will
correlate more highly and that correlation will decline over time in a non-linear manner as suggested by previous
studies.
H1: The correlation between student grades in statistics and decision science will be significantly lower if the gap
between the two courses includes the summer (3 months) when compared to the correlation between the
grades if students take the courses with four weeks between the courses (fall to spring semesters).
A
Journal of College Teaching & Learning August 2005 Volume 2, Number 8
26
H2: The correlation between student grades in statistics and decision science will be significantly lower if
students take the courses with a full semester and summer gap between them (fall and fall or spring and
spring semesters) when compared to the correlation between the grades if the gap between the two courses
includes only the summer (3 months).
H3: The decline in student retention, as demonstrated in hypotheses 1 and 2, is nonlinear.
METHODOLOGY
Over three years we tracked the class performance of male students in two quantitative business courses
(statistics and decision sciences). The decision science course required use of concepts learned in statistics. Only
students who took both courses from the same instructor were included in the data. The tests in these two courses
were quantitative problem-solving based examinations. The professor uses the same test problems each term.
To measure the effects of time we compared students who took the two courses in three different
sequencesfall to spring (a 4 week gap), spring to fall (a three month gap) and from spring to spring or fall to fall (an
eight month gap).
RESULTS
The results of the correlation provide very strong support for hypothesis one. The students who took the
courses in the fall to spring sequence had a correlation of 0.86 between their test scores in the two courses. Students
who took the courses in a spring to fall sequence had a correlation of 0.71 between their test scores. That correlation
is significantly lower that the correlation for the first group of students (p<. 001). The support for hypothesis two is
less strong but indicates a further decline in retention. Students who took the two courses in a spring and spring or fall
and fall sequence had a correlation of 0.68 between test scores in the two courses. This is significantly lower than the
previous test group of students who took the two courses in a spring to fall sequence (p<06).
These results clearly suggest a non-linear decline in student retention of knowledge, thus supporting
hypothesis three. Examining the total decline in test performance over time further supports that conclusion. For
instance, 91% of the drop in correlations over eight months (fall to fall or spring to spring) is accounted for in the first
three months as suggested by the decline in correlation for those students who took the course sequence in spring and
fall. More than 50% of the correlation decline occurred after one month as shown by comparing correlation results for
students who took the two courses with only a semester break between compared to those who took the two courses in
the spring and fall with a summer break.
To confirm that the correlations represented a decline in performance we performed an analysis of variance
shown in Table 1. The results of that analysis were significant at the p<. 002 level. Those results make it clear that
the class performance scores were in fact declining over time.
Table 1: Analysis of Variance
ANOVA
df
SS
MS
F
Significance F
Regression
1
388.2994912
388.2995
9.538943
0.002426
Residual
140
5698.946988
40.70676
Total
141
6087.246479
ANOVA
df
SS
MS
F
Significance F
Regression
1
388.2994912
388.2995
9.538943
0.002426
Residual
140
5698.946988
40.70676
Total
141
6087.246479
Journal of College Teaching & Learning August 2005 Volume 2, Number 8
27
DISCUSSION
This study contributes to the existing literature because of its specific design. Previous studies have relied on
tests to assess the retention of learning. The typical approach was to give students a test on a subject some time after
completing the course. This study is the first we could find that examines actual student class performance in courses
that require the use of knowledge learned in a previous course, specifically a pre-requisite course. Since the sample
was drawn from those students who took both courses from the same professor, the issue of what material was
covered with what degree of emphasis does not come into play.
This study suggests that the sequencing of courses can be important to students’ success. One surprising
aspect of the findings is the extent of decline in retention in the first weeks after the first course was completed. Over
50% of the retention decline seen after three months is evident after only four weeks. This finding seems to be
consistent with the views of Bahrick (1979) and Higbee (1977). However, as Semb, Ellis and Aranjo (1993) found,
retention of recall knowledge seems to decline more rapidly than other types of knowledge. Since the courses
involved in this study required a significant use of recall of concepts and methods from the statistics course to the
decision science course, the substantial early drop in knowledge retention may be a manifestation of what Semb, Ellis,
and Aranjo observed.
Farr (1987) and Bahrick and Hall (1991) found that the degree of learning was correlated to the retention.
Those findings suggest that students who did well in the first course (statistics) should also retain more knowledge,
and therefore do well in the subsequent decision science course. The high correlation (.86) between student grades for
those who took the two courses with only a four-week semester break is consistent with the conclusions of Farr (1987)
and Bahrick and Hall (1991).
This study has implications for course scheduling, advising, and curriculum planning. For example, students
should be encouraged to plan their academic sequences in a manner that takes these results into account. It is fairly
standard practice at our institution, for instance, to strongly encourage students to take all math requirements in a
semester-to-semester pattern and not “take a break” for a semester. The role of pre-requisites and the way courses are
scheduled to facilitate minimizing time between closely dependent courses may need to be given more consideration
in schedule planning by department chairs and deans. For example, it may make sense to offer more sections of a
course like statistics in the fall and subsequently offer more sections of decision science in the spring to accommodate
the maximum number of students. A similar pattern might make sense in other course like languages, accounting, and
mathematics. This kind of course scheduling pattern would facilitate more students taking sequential courses with
minimal time between them.
LIMITATIONS
Clearly further studies are needed to confirm these findings, especially in other disciplines. It should be
noted, though, that the findings in this study agree with previous studies cited and those studies included a variety of
subject matter ranging from social sciences to languages, to laboratory sciences. One limitation in this study relates to
student motivation. Our sample is derived from a student population that has well above average SAT scores who are
attending a highly regarded liberal arts college. The sample size of 141 in this study was large enough to likely
account for variations in GPA. Another area in need of more study is possible gender differences. The sample in this
study is all male since our institution is all male. While none of the previous studies cited noted any differences based
on gender, that is an area that needs further study specifically exploring the issue of possible gender differences.
REFERENCES
1. Bahrick, H. P. (1979). Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. Journal of
Experiment Psychology: General, 108:296-308.
2. Bahrick, H. P. (1984). Semantic memory content in permastore: Fifty years of memory for Spanish learning
in school. Journal of Experiment Psychology: General, 113:1-29.
Journal of College Teaching & Learning August 2005 Volume 2, Number 8
28
3. Bahrick, H. P. and Hall, L. K. (1991). Lifetime maintenance of high school mathematics content. Journal of
Experiment Psychology: General, 120:20-33.
4. Conway, M. A., Cohen, G. and Stanhope, N. (1992). Very long-term memory of knowledge acquired at
school and university. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6:467-482.
5. Cooper, I. L. and Greiner, J. M. (1971). Contingency management in an introductory psychology course
produces better retention. Psychological Record, 21:391-400
6. Farr, M. J. (1987). The Long-term Retention of Knowledge and Skills: A Cognitive and Instructional
Approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. Glasnapp, D. R., Poggio, J. P., and Ory, J. C. (1978). End-of-course and long-term retention outcomes for
mastery and nonmastery learning paradigms. Psychology in the Schools, 15:595-603.
8. Higbee, K. L. (1977). Your Memory: How it Works and How to Improve It. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
9. Semb, G. B. and Ellis, J. A. (1994). Knowledge taught in school: What is remembered? Review of
Educational Research, 64:253-286.
10. Semb, G. B., Ellis, J. A. and Aranjo, J. (1993). Long-term retention of knowledge learned in school. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 85:305-316.
11. Semb, G. B., Ellis, J. A. and Montague, W. E. (1990). Long-term memory for knowledge taught in school.
(Tech. Rep. No. NPRDC TR-91-1). San Diego: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
12. Wetzel, S. K., Konoske, P. I., and Montague, W. E. (1983) Estimating skill degradation for aviation
antisubmarine warfare operators (AWs): Loss of skill and knowledge following training. (Tech. Rep. No.
NPRDC TR-83-31). San Diego: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
... Although this is a normal human condition, it is problematic in the field of education, particularly in disciplines where coursework requires students to possess knowledge accumulated from previous classes. When foundational concepts are forgotten, new learning can be stunted (Kamuche & Ledman, 2005;Taylor et al., 2017). This is particularly true in mathematics and can be seen in other courses of study that require a strong mathematical background (Pearson Jr & Miller, 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
The retention of fundamental mathematical skills is imperative to provide a foundation on which new skills are developed. Educators often lament about student retention. Cognitive scientists and educators have explored teaching methods that produce learning which endures over time. We wanted to know if using spaced recall quizzes would prevent our students from forgetting fundamental mathematical concepts at a post high school preparatory school where students attend for 1 year preparing to enter the United States Military Academy (USMA). This approach was implemented in a Precalculus course to determine if it would improve students’ long-term retention. Our goal was to identify an effective classroom strategy that led to student recall of fundamental mathematical concepts through the end of the academic year. The concepts that were considered for long-term retention were 12 concepts identified by USMA’s mathematics department as being fundamental for entering students. These concepts are taught during quarter one of the Precalculus with Introduction to Calculus course at the United States Military Academy Preparatory School. It is expected that students will remember the concepts when they take the post-test 6 months later. Our research shows that spaced recall in the form of quizzing had a statistically significant impact on reducing the forgetting of the fundamental concepts while not adversely effecting performance on current instructional concepts. Additionally, these results persisted across multiple sections of the course taught at different times of the day by six instructors with varying teaching styles and years of teaching experience.
... Furthermore, it is well-documented in the literature that a significant amount of forgetting occurs within the first 4 weeks with retention rates progressively decreasing thereafter. [32] This rationale underpins the selection of a 4-week interval for evaluating knowledge retention frame in this study. ...
Article
Full-text available
INTRODUCTION Dental education assumes an indispensable role in adequately equipping students for a successful career in dentistry. Error-based active learning, an innovative approach in dental education, is a combination of mistake-driven learning (MDL) and case-based learning (CBL) to provide a transformative learning atmosphere for students. While active learning has gained popularity in dental education, the effectiveness of error-based active learning remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of error-based active learning among final-year dental undergraduate students in comparison with the conventional lecture-based approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS A parallel-arm single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted in a dental institute in India from November 2022 to December 2022. A total of 74 students were randomly allocated to two groups: Group A ( n = 37) received error-based active learning and group B ( n = 37) received conventional lecture-based learning approach. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) was chosen as the topic for the study. The knowledge of students was assessed at three intervals: baseline, post-intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention, using a self-designed and validated questionnaire with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87 and a content validity ratio of 0.84. A standard survey questionnaire was employed to evaluate students’ perceptions of the teaching methods. RESULTS Error-based active learning group outperformed the lecture-based group significantly in the post-intervention test (20.92 ± 1.42 vs 16.97 ± 3.06), with better knowledge retention (18.30 ± 2.02 vs 14.05 ± 4.26) and positive feedback from the students. CONCLUSIONS The error-based active learning approach proved superior to the conventional lecture-based method in enhancing and retaining knowledge regarding ART.
... The opposite however is true, where studies assess retention at the end of a semester, between semesters or quarters which could be a few weeks to a few months [7] [8] [22] [12] [13]. Other studies that have looked at knowledge retention over a long period of time assess course outcomes and semester (or yearly) cohort performance for a course rather than the same cohort over many semesters [16] [23] [24]. Only a few of these studies investigated the effect of the time lapse between taking the test or assessment instrument [13] [24] [10] with similar findings. ...
... Pemaparan guru ini juga diperkuat bahwa selain merancang strategi pembelajaran, guru juga harus mempertimbangkan durasi waktu pembelajaran bagi peserta didik. Pengaruh waktu juga memberikan dampak terhadap tingkat retensi peserta didik (Kamuche & Ledman, 2005). Analisis materi yang sulit ini diperoleh guru dari rendahnya hasil belajar peserta didik setelah pembelajaran berlangsung. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to describe a learning model based on long term memory retention using the SMART learning model for students at the basic education level that is applied by teachers in the Natural Science (IPA) learning process. The method used is descriptive qualitative with case studies. The data source is high grade teachers in elementary schools. The results showed that the SMART learning model is a model with a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) approach that integrates religious and artistic values in learning. This model can be used as a reference for a learning model that has a role to strengthen the retention rate of elementary school science material.
... Retrieval practice + spacing: a potential solution to an age-old problem Some common undergraduate studying practices, such as rereading notes and textbooks, promote only fleeting memory of course content. Information is retained long enough to support adequate performance on near-term tests but is forgotten soon after (Bacon & Stewart, 2006;Conway et al., 1991;Kamuche & Ledman, 2005;Rawson et al., 2013). Forgetting course content is antithetical to the central premise of education and is especially problematic when success in higher-level courses depends on retention from lower-level courses. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Undergraduate STEM instructors want to help students learn and retain knowledge for their future courses and careers. One promising evidence-based technique that is thought to increase long-term memory is spaced retrieval practice, or repeated testing over time. The beneficial effect of spacing has repeatedly been demonstrated in the laboratory as well as in undergraduate mathematics courses, but its generalizability across diverse STEM courses is unknown. We investigated the effect of spaced retrieval practice in nine introductory STEM courses. Retrieval practice opportunities were embedded in bi-weekly quizzes, either massed on a single quiz or spaced over multiple quizzes. Student performance on practice opportunities and a criterial test at the end of each course were examined as a function of massed or spaced practice. We also conducted a single-paper meta-analysis on criterial test scores to assess the generalizability of the effectiveness of spaced retrieval practice across introductory STEM courses. Results Significant positive effects of spacing on the criterial test were found in only two courses (Calculus I for Engineers and Chemistry for Health Professionals), although small positive effect sizes were observed in two other courses (General Chemistry and Diversity of Life). Meta-analyses revealed a significant spacing effect when all courses were included, but not when calculus was excluded. The generalizability of the spacing effect across STEM courses therefore remains unclear. Conclusions Although we could not clearly determine the generalizability of the benefits of spacing in STEM courses, our findings indicate that spaced retrieval practice could be a low-cost method of improving student performance in at least some STEM courses. More work is needed to determine when, how, and for whom spaced retrieval practice is most beneficial. The effect of spacing in classroom settings may depend on some design features such as the nature of retrieval practice activities (multiple-choice versus short answer) and/or feedback settings, as well as student actions (e.g., whether they look at feedback or study outside of practice opportunities). The evidence is promising, and further pragmatic research is encouraged.
... Forgetfulness is inevitable in human recalling ability. Most learners experience a loss of learned materials after a course is completed (Kamuche & Ledman, 2005). However, people are educated, particularly in mathematics, to enable them to use the knowledge gained to solve problems encountered in their daily lives. ...
Article
Memorization and forgetfulness in Mathematics Education have been major issues in most developing countries, including Ghana. This work explored forgetfulness and memorization in the context of the fractional calculus domain using the Mittag-Leffler function. The Sumudu transform was employed to obtain a special solution. The existence and uniqueness of solutions was established using the concept of the fixed-point theory. It is established that fractional order plays a major role in memorization and forgetfulness of mathematical concepts. It is concluded that factors that enhance the teaching and learning of mathematical concepts should be encouraged.
... Learning activities will be more meaningful through new concepts that must connect to previously learned concepts to boost student retention and be capable of being maintained in long-term memory (Sanatullova-Allison, 2014). Strong memory or retention enables students to store what they have learned in long-term memory (Kamuche, 2005). ...
Article
Full-text available
(Objective) The current study explored the correlation and contribution of critical thinking and metacognitive skills toward female and male students' retention in senior high school. (Methodology) This study used a descriptive correlational design, where critical thinking and metacognitive skills served as the predictor, during retention as the criterion. A total of 230 students participated in this study. The participants comprised 112 (48.70%) male students and 118 (51.30%) female students. An essay test and a scoring rubric were used to collect data on participants' critical thinking and metacognitive skills. The research data were analyzed using a multiple regression analysis at a 5% significance level, followed by ANOVA to examine the contribution of critical thinking and metacognitive skills toward male and female students' retention. (Results) The statistical analysis revealed that the simultaneous contribution of critical thinking and metacognitive skills toward female students' retention as higher han that toward male students' retention. The effective contribution values of critical thinking and metacognitive skills toward male students' retention were 2.44% and 10.06%, respectively. Meanwhile, critical thinking and metacognitive skills contributed 7.89% and 12.81% toward female students' retention. (Conclusions) There was a simultaneous correlation between critical thinking, metacognitive skills, and retention of male and female high school students. The effective contribution of critical thinking and metacognitive skills toward female students' retention was more significant than that toward male students' retention. The findings of this study suggest that high school teachers need to consider gender equality when implementing learning strategies to improve critical thinking and metacognitive skills.
... In their meta-analysis, Wu et al. (2020) present that immediate learning was higher for IVR compared to DVR groups. Since initial learning predicts future performance (Arthur Jr. et al. 1998;Kamuche and Ledman 2005), it is expected that: ...
Article
Full-text available
Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly used in learning and can be experienced with a head-mounted display as a 3D immersive version (immersive virtual reality [IVR]) or with a PC (or another computer) as a 2D desktop-based version (desktop virtual reality [DVR]). A research gap is the effect of IVR and DVR on learners’ skill retention. To address this gap, we designed an experiment in which learners were trained and tested for the assembly of a procedural industrial task. We found nonsignificant differences in the number of errors, the time to completion, satisfaction, self-efficacy, and motivation. The results support the view that DVR and IVR are similarly useful for learning retention. These insights may help researchers and practitioners to decide which form of VR they should use.
... This observation is consistent with literature in the field of education, in which the time that elapses between learning new material and being tested on or applying that material has been studied extensively (e.g., Carpenter, Cepeda, Rohrer, Kang, & Pashler, 2012). In general, learning performance is better when evaluated sooner after learning than later (Cepeda, Vul, Rohrer, Wixted, & Pashler, 2008;Kamuche & Ledman, 2005). Research that compares 'mass' training and 'spaced' training effects suggests that for long-term retention, there should be spacing gaps between training (Cepeda, Vul, Rohrer, Wixted, & Pashler, 2008). ...
Article
Full-text available
Although implicit bias training programs have become common, the effects of these programs on employee attitudes and behaviours are still unclear, particularly when it comes to the efficacy of repeated, mandatory training. Additional understanding of these programs’ efficacy is needed for setting effective training policy. We measured the effects of training in a mandatory bias literacy program for academic staff involved in personnel decisions at an American public university, specifically by examining the relationship among bias-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours and two training variables: the number of times training had been completed, and the time since last training. Time since training had a beneficial effect on behavioural intentions whereas training repetition showed a slight detrimental effect. Results of demographic factors investigated indicated effects of gender, amount of personnel-related committee service, and years at the university on training outcomes. Implications of these results for training policy at universities are discussed.
Book
Full-text available
This book is dedicated to the current trends and new challenges that have emerged from the new e-learning environment, focusing on its potential to revolutionize Healthcare Education and exploring how it may help to better prepare future healthcare professionals for their daily practice. “E-learning and Digital Training in Healthcare Education: Current Trends and New Challenges” contains several research articles focused on new insights into the use of interactive and intuitive e-learning tools and innovative teaching methodologies that engage healthcare students in the new web-based environment training. It also includes several case studies of ‘pathfinder’ e-learning initiatives and surveys related to the penetration and acceptance of digital training in Healthcare Education.
Article
Full-text available
An analysis of life span memory identifies those variables that affect losses in recall and recognition of the content of high school algebra and geometry courses. Even in the absence of further rehearsal activities, individuals who take college-level mathematics courses at or above the level of calculus have minimal losses of high school algebra for half a century. Individuals who performed equally well in the high school course but took no college mathematics courses reduce performance to near chance levels during the same period. In contrast, the best predictors of test performance (e.g., Scholastic Aptitude Test scores and grades) have trivial effects on the rate of performance decline. Pedagogical implications for life span maintenance of knowledge are derived and discussed.
Article
What Are Mnemonics? The word mnemonic (pronounced "ne MON ik") is briefly defined as "aiding the memory." It is derived from Mnemosyne, the name of the ancient Greek goddess of memory. "Mnemonics" refers in general to methods for improving memory; a mnemonic technique is any technique that aids the memory. Most researchers, however, define mnemonics more narrowly as being what most people consider to be rather unusual, artificial memory aids. First-letter Mnemonics A cue is what is known as an acronym—a word that is made out of the first letters of the items to be remembered. In this example the acronym HOMES stands for Huron, Ontario, Michigan, Erie, and Superior. Using the word HOMES as a cue you can likely now remember the names of the Great Lakes. A mnemonic technique that is similar to the acronym is the acrostic—a series of words, lines, or verses in which the first letters form a word or phrase; for example, an acrostic for remembering the names of the Great Lakes might be, Healthy Old Men Exercise Some. Acronyms and acrostics are referred to by most mnemonics researchers as "first-letter mnemonics" (for reasons that should be obvious).
Article
Popular belief holds that much of what is taught in classrooms is forgotten shortly thereafter. However, there is evidence from numerous studies that long-term retention for knowledge taught in school is substantial. These studies are reviewed, and several variables that affect the ability to remember are discussed. The article concludes that (a) students retain much of the knowledge taught in the classroom; (b) retention decreases over time as a function of the length of the retention interval but the forgetting curves for knowledge taught in school do not decline as rapidly or asymptote as low as the curves observed in traditional laboratory studies; (c) increasing the level of original learning differentially affects retention performance; (d) both instructional content and assessment tasks affect learning and retention, with one of the most consistent effects being that recognition tasks are retained at higher levels than recall tasks; (e) most instructional strategies that promote higher levels of original learning do not result in differentially better retention (however, several exceptions are discussed); and (f) while higher ability students learn and remember more than lower ability students, there is no evidence for differential forgetting. Implications for research and teaching are discussed.
Article
Using both end-of-course achievement outcomes and long-term cognitive retention as criteria, the present study provides comparative data on the effectiveness of a mastery and nonmastery approach to instruction. Differential effects across taxonomic levels were assessed for both criteria. The results indicated that mastery students performed significantly higher than non-mastery students for end-of-course outcomes at the highest taxonomic level and equally well for knowledge, comprehension, and application level outcomes. Retention differences were found for knowledge level outcomes only, with mastery students demonstrating significantly greater retention performance. The feasibility and desirability of implementing a learning for mastery paradigm in a single course at the college level are discussed relative to the magnitude of the present results.
Article
Recent research into the very long-term retention of knowledge originally acquired during the process of formal education at school and university has demonstrated that such knowledge may be retained at high levels over very long retention intervals. The pattern of retention typically takes the form of a comparatively short period marked by forgetting (lasting between 1 and 6 years) followed by a long period of stable retention (usually longer than 30 years). For courses taken at school the level attained over a series of courses (e.g. in learning a foreign language or studying mathematics) is an important determinant of long-term retention. Students who attain moderate or advanced levels of learning show high levels of retention with very little forgetting, whereas students who attain only lower levels of learning show steady forgetting, and after a period of 6 years retain very little knowledge. Similar patterns of retention are present for university students taking single courses in science and literature subjects, and students with higher grades retain more knowledge although the reliable relationship here, between grade obtained and amount remembered, is weak and accounts for only small portions of the variance in retention. Taken together these findings suggest that the retention of knowledge acquired through formal education persists over longer periods of time than popularly believed. Recent theory proposes that these long-lasting effects of education are partly related to the types of learning schedules followed during acquisition and partly related to the nature of the to-be-acquired knowledge, and to whether or not knowledge can be represented schematically.
Book
This report reviews factors that influence how well knowledge and skills are retained over relatively long periods of nonuse. A cognitively oriented interpretation is applied to prior findings and beliefs about the nature of long-term retention. The report identifies instructional strategies (conditions of learning) which promote long-term retention and do not have an adverse impact on learning.
Article
Subjects, 20 AWs in the S-3A training pipeline who attended a basic acoustic analysis course and a follow-on operator course, were tested to determine if they retained the skills and knowledge required for satisfactory performance of acoustic analysis and classification over the 25-day nonutilization period between the two courses. The original learning measure was the basic course final examination, comprised of (1) a multiple-choice knowledge exam consisting of both factual and computational items, and (2) a performance test that examined student performance of acoustic analysis and classification procedures on static linear lofargrams. The retention measure, administered approximately 1 month later, consisted of alternate forms of the original measure. Results showed that students performed better on the original measure than on the retention tests for most of the variables analyzed. Significant differences were found for all scores on the knowledge test (overall, the factual test items, and the computational test items) and for performance for the analysis variables on the performance test. No significant differences were found for the classification variable. It was concluded that, over the 25-day nonutilization period, the skills and knowledge of students in the S-3A acoustic analyst training pipeline degraded significantly.
Article
This study examined students' retention of knowledge-based college course content after 4- and 11-months. Retention was evaluated for group-paced and self-paced instructional delivery. The study focused on the ability to recognize information learned in school. There were no measures of the ability to recall information or solve problems. The results indicated that: (1) students scored approximately 85 percent after 4 months and about 80 percent after 11 months; (2) self-paced students performed significantly better on all tests at both intervals than did group-paced students; (3) the amount of information lost did not differ significantly between groups across the two retention intervals and; (4) the amount of information lost relative to initial learning did not differ significantly between groups across the two retention intervals. Because the multiple-choice and true-false test item formats used in this study are identical to those used in most Navy introductory technical courses and because of the similarities in the type of information taught in the college course and Navy courses (e.g. names, definitions, principles), it can be concluded that students will be able to recognize knowledge learned in Navy technical classrooms even after an 11-month retention interval. Further research is planned to investigate students' ability to recall information learned in school. Keywords: Long term memory, Self-paced instruction, Retention.
Article
Investigated an approach to teaching based on a variant of F. Keller's (see pa, vol. 43:4532) contingency management method of instruction. 2 matched sections of undergraduates (n = 87) were taught the same material by the same instructor, using the keller method or a traditional lecture approach. Ss taught by the keller method (a) performed significantly better on a postcourse quiz, (b) spent significantly greater time in preparation, (c) enjoyed the text material more, and (d) felt they learned significantly more. On a long-term retention test given 5 mo. After course termination, keller-method ss retained significantly more material than those receiving the traditional approach. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)