Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND
Content may be subject to copyright.
VOLUME 6 | ISSUE 2 | 2011 |
264
Tapering for triathlon competition
IÑIGO MUJIKA
1
USP Araba Sport Clinic, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Basque
Country
ABSTRACT
Mujika I. Tapering for triathlon competition. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 264-270, 2011. The
taper is a phase of reduced training before major competitions. Training intensity should be maintained to
retain or enhance training-induced adaptations during tapering, but reductions in other training variables
should allow for sufficient recovery to optimize performance. Lowering training volume by about 41-60%
induces positive physiological, psychological and performances adaptations in highly trained triathletes, but
performance benefits could be attained with somewhat smaller or bigger volumes. A final increase of 20-
30% of the training load during the last days before a race may be beneficial. High training frequencies
(>80%) seem to be necessary to avoid detraining and “loss of feel” in highly trained triathletes. The optimal
duration of the taper varies widely, and tapers lasting 4 to 28 days may be ideal for individual athletes. If a
temporary increase of about 20% over the normal training load is planned during the month preceding the
taper, the duration of the taper should be extended. Particular attention should be given during the taper to
recovery strategies, which may help to induce parasympathetic reactivation and muscle fatigue reduction.
Adequate hydration, nutrition and carbohydrate loading strategies are recommended to help triathletes
perform at their best. Travel, heat and altitude are environmental factors that often need to be integrated
within the taper plan, and the need for multiple peaking is another issue that needs to be addressed by
coaches and triathletes. Key words: PERFORMANCE, ELITE, TRIATHLON
1
Corresponding author. USP Araba Sport Clinic. Paseo de la Biosfera s/n. ES–01013 Vitoria-Gasteiz. Spain.
E-mail: inigo.mujika@usphospitales.com
Submitted for publication February 2011
Accepted for publication March 2011
JOURNAL OF HUMAN SPORT & EXERCISE ISSN 1988-5202
© Faculty of Education. University of Alicante
doi:10.4100/jhse.2011.62.06
Review Article
Mujika I / Tapering for triathlon JOURNAL OF HUMAN SPORT & EXERCISE
265
| 2011 | ISSUE 2 | VOLUME 6 © 2011 University of Alicante
INTRODUCTION
The most important goal for coaches and triathletes is to increase the competitive abilities of the athletes to
maximal levels, and to design a well controlled training program to ensure that peak performance is
attained at each point of a major triathlon competition. In triathlon, top performances are often associated
with a taper, which is a marked reduction in the training load for a few days before the competition. The
taper has been defined as “a progressive, nonlinear reduction of the training load during a variable period
of time that is intended to reduce physiological and psychological stress of daily training and optimize sport
performance” (Mujika & Padilla, 2003). The taper is thus of great importance to a triathlete’s performance
and the outcome of the event.
MANAGING THE TRAINING LOAD DURING THE TAPER
The training load or training stimulus in triathlon is a combination of training intensity, volume and frequency
(Wenger & Bell, 1986). This training load is markedly reduced during the taper to decrease accumulated
fatigue, but reduced training should not be detrimental to training-induced adaptations. Triathletes and their
coaches must determine the extent to which the training load can be reduced at the expense of the training
components while retaining or improving adaptations. A meta-analysis conducted by Bosquet et al. (2007)
established the scientific bases for successfully reducing training loads to achieve peak performances in
competition. Most of the studies analyzed were conducted in swimming, cycling or running, but they are
relevant for triathlon. Bosquet et al. assessed the effects of altering components of the taper on
performance.
Intensity: The results indicated that the training load should not be reduced at the
expense of training intensity during a taper.
Volume: Performance improvement during the taper was highly sensitive to the reduction
in training volume. It was determined that maximal performance gains are obtained with a
total reduction in training volume of 41–60% compared to pre-taper training.
Frequency: Decreasing the number of weekly training sessions was not shown to improve
performance. However, a decrease in training frequency interacts with other training
variables, particularly training volume, making it difficult to isolate the precise effect of a
reduction in training frequency on performance.
Pattern of the taper: Of the four taper patterns that have been described (linear,
exponential with slow or fast decay of the training load, and step taper), Bosquet et al.
(2007) could only address the effect of progressive versus step tapers on performance, the
former being in general more effective than the latter. Recommendations based on the
work of Banister et al. (1999) with triathletes suggest that a fast decay implying a lower
training volume is more beneficial to cycling and running performance than a slow decay of
the training load. Increasing the training load by 20 to 30% during the final three days of
the taper my optimize performance (Thomas et al., 2009).
Mujika I / Tapering for triathlon JOURNAL OF HUMAN SPORT & EXERCISE
VOLUME 6 | ISSUE 2 | 2011 |
266
Duration of the taper: A taper duration of 8 to 14 days seems to represent the borderline
between the positive influence of fatigue disappearance and the negative influence of
detraining on performance, but performance improvements can also be expected after
tapers lasting 1 to 4 weeks. There is great interindividual variability in the optimal taper
duration (Mujika et al., 1996; Thomas & Busso, 2005). Mathematical modeling simulations
suggest that training performed immediately before the taper influences its optimal
duration (Thomas et al., 2008).
Specific taper for swimming, cycling and running: Training intensity should be
maintained whatever the mode of locomotion. A 41–60% decrease in training volume is
optimal in swimming, but the optimal decrease ranges between 21 and 60% in cycling and
running. A 8–14 d taper seems optimal in cycling and running, but longer taper durations
are suitable in swimming. Cyclists seem to respond particularly well to step tapers in which
training frequency is reduced (Bosquet et al., 2007).
Training load before the taper: The optimal duration of the taper for a given athlete
varies with training done before the taper. Greater training volume and/or intensity before
the taper may increase performance gains, but would require a longer taper (Thomas and
Busso, 2005; Coutts et al., 2007).
ENHANCING RECOVERY DURING THE TAPER
Achieving an appropriate balance between training stress and recovery is important to maximize
performance in triathlon. The cumulative effects of training-induced fatigue must be reduced during the
weeks immediately preceding competition, and a wide range of recovery modalities can be used as integral
part of the taper to help optimize performance.
Reducing muscular fatigue: Delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) may be
detrimental to an ongoing training program for several days (Cheung et al., 2003).
Modalities that enhance the rate of recovery from DOMS and exercise-induced muscle
damage may enhance the beneficial effects of the taper for triathletes.
Massage: Massage therapy after eccentric exercise that resulted in DOMS is a commonly
used recovery treatment, but few investigations have examined the effect of massage on
sports performance. There is also a wide range of massage techniques utilized and
outcome measures examined. However, there is some evidence to suggest that massage
after eccentric exercise may reduce muscle soreness (Weerapong et al., 2005).
Compression garments: The use of clothing with specific compressive qualities is
becoming increasingly widespread, especially as competition approaches. The use of
lower limb compression for athletes derives from research in clinical settings showing
positive effects of compression following trauma or some chronic diseases, and
performance and recovery after exercise-induced damage may also improve in athletes (Ali
et al., 2007; Bringard et al., 2006; Kraemer et al., 2001; Trenell et al., 2006).
Recovery of the autonomic nervous system: Triathletes usually endure very severe
training loads, inducing both adaptive effects and stress reactions. The high frequency of
the stimuli imposed makes these adaptive effects cumulative. Unfortunately, incomplete
Mujika I / Tapering for triathlon JOURNAL OF HUMAN SPORT & EXERCISE
267
| 2011 | ISSUE 2 | VOLUME 6 © 2011 University of Alicante
recovery from frequent training can make the stress-related side-effects cumulative as well.
One key aspect of the stress response is the decrease of the activity of the autonomic
nervous system (ANS), which regulates the basic visceral processes needed to maintain
normal bodily functions. The reduction of the ANS activity during intensive training
correlates with performance losses, and a rebound in ANS activity during tapering parallels
performance gains (Garet et al., 2004). The most important factor determining the ANS
reactivation seems to be sleep duration and quality. Maximizing sleep in a dark, calm,
relaxing and fresh atmosphere is essential during the week preceding the race for optimal
performance (Halson, 2008).
MANAGING NUTRITION AND HYDRATION DURING THE TAPER
Maintaining a good nutritional and hydration status is critical for successful triathlon competition. Starting a
race with a poor hydration status or low glycogen stores jeopardizes performance. Triathletes must adopt
nutrition and hydration strategies before competition to maximize the benefits of the taper.
Hydration status: Environmental heat stress can challenge the limits of a triathlete’s
cardiovascular and temperature regulation systems, body fluid balance, and performance.
Evaporative sweating is the principal means of heat loss in warm-hot environments where
sweat losses frequently exceed fluid intakes. Dehydration augments hyperthermia and
plasma volume reductions, which combine to accentuate cardiovascular strain and reduce
V
̇
O
2max
(Cheuvront et al., 2010). Maintaining adequate hydration during the taper and
especially during the 48 h preceding a triathlon competition is key to ensure that work
capacity is not diminished at the beginning of the race (Casa et al., 2010). Urine color is an
inexpensive and reliable indicator of hydration status (Armstrong et al., 1994), and it may
provide a valid means for triathletes to self-assess hydration level, notably during the taper
period.
Glycogen resynthesis/supercompensation: Reductions in the training load during the
taper in favor of rest and recovery lower a triathlete’s daily energy expenditure, potentially
impacting on their energy balance and body composition. Triathletes should therefore pay
special attention to their energy intake during the taper to avoid energy imbalance and
undesirable changes in body composition (Almeras et al., 1997; Mujika et al., 2010). Not
only energy intake should match energy expenditure; carbohydrate-loading during the
taper should be emphasized to optimize muscle glycogen storage (Wilson and Wilson,
2008).
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
A taper intends to minimize a triathlete’s habitual stressors, allowing physiological systems to undergo
“supercompensation’’. Environmental factors may represent an additional source of stress for a triathlete,
and they must be considered in a systematic way when tapering is prescribed (Pyne et al., 2009).
The stress of travel: International travel is an essential part of the life of elite triathletes,
both for competition and training. Long-distance travel is associated with transient negative
effects known as ‘travel fatigue’. Travel fatigue lasts for only a day or so, but for those who
fly across several time zones, there are also the longer-lasting difficulties associated with
Mujika I / Tapering for triathlon JOURNAL OF HUMAN SPORT & EXERCISE
VOLUME 6 | ISSUE 2 | 2011 |
268
‘jet lag’. The problems of jet lag can last for over a week if the flight crosses 10 time zones
or more and they can reduce performance (Waterhouse et al., 2007). The time-scale for
adjustment of the body clock can be incorporated into the taper when competition requires
travel across multiple meridians.
Heat acclimatization: Most triathlon competitions take place during summer and in warm
environmental conditions, and exercising in the heat can lead to serious performance
decrements. Because heat acclimatization seems to be the most effective strategy to limit
the deleterious effect of heat on performance, this specific aspect needs to be taken into
account by triathletes to optimize the benefits of the taper. Tapering in hot conditions
before competition is compatible with the 7-14 days reduction in training volume advocated
when encountering heat stress (Pyne et al., 2009).
Altitude: Altitude training is used in many sports at elite level for conditioning purposes.
Athletes using training camps at altitude are aware that a reduction in training load is
imperative at altitude, prior to an increase as the initial phase of acclimatization occurs. A
period of lowered training is also observed prior to competing after altitude training, which
constitutes a form of tapering. However, the extent of the benefit, as well as the variation
between individuals, has not been adequately explored (Pyne et al., 2009).
Multiple peaking in triathlon: Triathletes competing in Olympic distance competitions
have reduced opportunities to taper because of repeated racing during the competitive
period. Peaking for major competitions every two to four weeks poses the problem of
choosing between recovering from previous competition and then rebuilding fitness, or
maintaining intensive training and capitalizing on adaptations acquired during the previous
training cycle. Both approaches can be valid, depending on a triathlete’s level of fatigue
after a race or series of races and the time frame between triathlons.
REFERENCES
1. ALI A, CAINE MP, SNOW BG. Graduated compression stockings: physiological and perceptual
responses during and after exercise. J Sports Sci. 2007; 25:413-419. [Abstract] [Back to text]
2. ALMERAS N, LEMIEUX S, BOUCHARD C, TREMBLAY A. Fat gain in female swimmers. Physiol
Behav. 1997; 61:811-817. doi:10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00559-8 [Back to text]
3. ARMSTRONG LE, MARESH CM, CASTELLANI JW, BERGERON MF, KENEFICK RW, LAGASSE
KE, RIEBE D. Urinary indices of hydration status. Int J Sport Nutr. 1994; 4:265-279. [Abstract]
[Back to text]
4. BANISTER EW, CARTER JB, ZARKADAS PC. Training theory and taper: validation in triathlon
athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999; 79:182-191. doi:10.1007/s004210050493 [Back
to text]
5. BOSQUET L, MONTPETIT J, ARVISAIS D, MUJIKA I. Effects of tapering on performance: a meta-
analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39:1358-1365. doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31806010e0 [Back
to text]
6. BRINGARD A, PERREY S, BELLUYE N. Aerobic energy cost and sensation responses during
submaximal running exercise--positive effects of wearing compression tights. Int J Sports Med.
2006; 27:373-378. doi:10.1055/s-2005-865718 [Back to text]
Mujika I / Tapering for triathlon JOURNAL OF HUMAN SPORT & EXERCISE
269
| 2011 | ISSUE 2 | VOLUME 6 © 2011 University of Alicante
7. CASA DJ, STEARNS RL, LOPEZ RM, GANIO MS, MCDERMOTT BP, WALKER YEARGIN S,
YAMAMOTO LM, MAZEROLLE SM, ROTI MW, ARMSTRONG LE, MARESH CM. Influence of
hydration on physiological function and performance during trail running in the heat. J Athl Train.
2010; 45:147-156. [Abstract] [Back to text]
8. CHEUNG K, HUME P, MAXWELL L. Delayed onset muscle soreness : treatment strategies and
performance factors. Sports Med. 2003; 33:145-164. [Abstract] [Back to text]
9. CHEUVRONT SN, KENEFICK RW, MONTAIN SJ, SAWKA MN. Mechanisms of aerobic
performance impairment with heat stress and dehydration. J Appl Physiol. 2010; 109:1989-1995.
[Abstract] [Back to text]
10. COUTTS AJ, SLATTERY KM, WALLACE LK. Practical tests for monitoring performance, fatigue
and recovery in triathletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2007; 10: 372-381. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2007.02.007
[Back to text]
11. GARET M, TOURNAIRE N, ROCHE F, LAURENT R, LACOUR JR, BARTHELEMY JC, PICHOT V.
Individual Interdependence between nocturnal ANS activity and performance in swimmers. Med
Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36:2112-2118. [Abstract] [Back to text]
12. HALSON S. Nutrition, sleep and recovery. Eur J Sport Sci. 2008; 8:199-126.
doi:10.1080/17461390801954794 [Back to text]
13. KRAEMER WJ, BUSH JA, WICKHAM RB, DENEGAR CR, GOMEZ AL, GOTSHALK LA, DUNCAN
ND, VOLEK JS, PUTUKIAN M, SEBASTIANELLI WJ. Influence of compression therapy on
symptoms following soft tissue injury from maximal eccentric exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.
2001; 31:282-290. [Abstract] [full text] [Back to text]
14. MUJIKA I, BUSSO T, LACOSTE L, BARALE F, GEYSSANT A, CHATARD JC. Modeled responses
to training and taper in competitive swimmers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996; 28:251-258. [Abstract]
[Back to text]
15. MUJIKA I, CHAOUACHI A, CHAMARI K. Precompetition taper and nutritional strategies: special
reference to training during Ramadan intermittent fast. Br J Sports Med. 2010; 44:495-501.
doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.071274 [Back to text]
16. MUJIKA I, PADILLA S. Scientific bases for precompetition tapering strategies. Med Sci Sports
Exerc. 2003; 35:1182-1187. [Abstract] [Back to text]
17. PYNE DB, MUJIKA I, REILLY T. Peaking for optimal performance: Research limitations and future
directions. J Sports Sci. 2009; 27:195-202. doi:10.1080/02640410802509136 [Back to text]
18. THOMAS L, BUSSO T. A theoretical study of taper characteristics to optimize performance. Med
Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37:1615-1621. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000177461.94156.4b [Back to text]
19. THOMAS L, MUJIKA I, BUSSO T. A model study of optimal training reduction during pre-event
taper in elite swimmers. J Sports Sci. 2008; 26:643-652. doi:10.1080/02640410701716782 [Back
to text]
20. THOMAS L, MUJIKA I, BUSSO T. Computer simulations assessing the potential performance
benefit of a final increase in training during pre-event taper. J Strength Cond Res. 2009; 23:1729-
1736. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3dfa1 [Back to text]
21. TRENELL MI, ROONEY KB, SUE CM, THOMPSON CH. Compression garments and recovery
from eccentric exercise: a 31P-MRS study. J Sport Sci Med. 2006; 5:106-114. [Full text] [Back to
text]
22. WATERHOUSE J, REILLY T, ATKINSON G, EDWARDS B. Jet lag: trends and coping strategies.
Lancet. 2007; 369:1117-1129. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60529-7 [Back to text]
Mujika I / Tapering for triathlon JOURNAL OF HUMAN SPORT & EXERCISE
VOLUME 6 | ISSUE 2 | 2011 |
270
23. WEERAPONG P, HUME PA, KOLT GS. The mechanisms of massage and effects on
performance, muscle recovery and injury prevention. Sports Med. 2005; 35:235-256.
doi:10.1519/SSC.0b013e3181c33918 [Back to text]
24. WENGER HA, BELL GJ. The interactions of intensity, frequency and duration of exercise training
in altering cardiorespiratory fitness. Sports Med. 1986; 3:346-356. [Abstract] [Back to text]
25. WILSON JM, WILSON GJ. A practical approach to the taper. Strength Cond J. 2008; 30:10-17.
doi:10.1519/SSC.0b013e3181636dd5 [Back to text]