This study investigates the value-relevance of financial statements information (hereafter, FSI) to stock market over time. The issue is crucial to investigated due to growing a claim in capital market community in the recent years that financial statements of Indonesian public firms had lost or deteriorated their relevance to stock market. The same claim also upwards in US and other countries. However, value-relevance studies investigated the claim report inconclusive evidence. The main limitation of the studies is that their valuation basis relies only on the Ohlson (1995) valuation theory.
The studies ignore efficient capital market (ECM) theory in which over last decades used in the information content studies. Besides, the studies do not yet take account of the impact of growth level of financial statements numbers (GLFSN), the quality of FSI (QFSI) and the disclosure quality of FSI (DQFSI) as moderating variables having contingency effect to the relevance of FSI. Therefore, this study applies both the Ohlson (1995) valuation theory and ECM theory (Beaver, 1998) as valuation basis. The study also considers GLFSN, QFSI and DQFSI as moderating variables.
This study hypothesis: First, value-relevance of FSI to stock market does not decline over time. Second, GLFSN has significantly effect in increasing value relevance of FSI, and the relevance of financial statements having positive GLFSN is higher than of ones having negative GLFSN. Third, QFSI has significantly effect to enhance value relevance of FSI, and relevance of financial statements having net income containing transitory components is lower than of ones having permanent earnings. It is also supposed that the relevance of financial statements having low earnings management (LEM) level is
higher than of ones having high earnings management (HEM) level. Fourth, DQFSI has significantly effect in increasing value-relevance of FSI. The relevance of financial statements containing intangible assets is higher than value relevance of ones not containing intangible asset, and value-relevance of financial statements released at the early date is higher than of ones released at last minute of the required reporting date.
Using sample from listed manufacture firms at the JSX over 1995-2004, the results indicate that financial statements have still value relevance over time, although its relevance tends to low. In spite of the fact that around event periods of financial statements releases (t.-2, 2 and t.-1, 1) the relevance tends to decline (reject Ho1), but at the announcement date (t.0) its relevance has a tendency to increase over time
(accept Ho1). This study also documents few findings as follows: 1) GLFSN and QFSI do not have contingency effect in increasing value relevance of FSI (reject H2a and H3), while DQFSI have contingent effect in increasing the relevance (accept H4); 2) value relevance of financial statements containing positive GLFSN, permanent earnings and LEM is lower than of ones containing negative GLFSN, net income with transitory earnings components and HEM (reject H2b, H3a dan H3b); and 3) value relevance of financial statements containing intangible assets and released at the early date is higher than of ones not containing intangible assets and released at the end of the required reporting date. This study concludes that the relevance of FSI after including GLFSN and LEM tends to decline at t.-2, 2 and t.-1,1, but it raises significantly at t.0. And, the relevance of FSI after including DQFSI tends to increase significantly at the time t.-2, 2, t.-1,1 and t.0.
Keywords: value-relevance, information quality, disclosure quality, contingency effect, permanent