ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Most entrepreneurial principles apply to environmental ventures as well.Ecopreneurship (i.e., environmental entrepreneurship) is outlined from a practical and an academic perspective, based on previous research.Environmental businesses are classified in four categories:nature-oriented enterprises, producers of environmental technology, providers of environmental management services, and producers of environmentally friendly products. Each classification is discussed in terms of the drivers (geographical influences, reason for market emergence, degree of enforcement) that influence their existence.Three major barriers to ecopreneurship--the challenge of market creation, financing barriers, and ethics-based decision making--are described, and implications are discussed.A typology of ecopreneurs is created based on a desire to change the world and a desire to make money.Concluding remarks provide an overview of these drivers and barriers and explain how they contribute to the market-creation difficulties experienced by environmental businesses as compared to non-environmental businesses. (AKP)
Content may be subject to copyright.
GMI 38 Summer 2002 71
An Insider’s Experiences with
Environmental Entrepreneurship
Lassi Linnanen
Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
The author argues that most of the normal entrepreneurial laws are valid also for
environmental ventures. However, the value-based leadership often rightly associ-
ated with environmental entrepreneurs gives a special flavour to these businesses.
With hands-on practical experience and an insightful theoretical orientation, the
author analyses typical environmental business features and its main segments and
presents a typology of ecopreneurs.
Entrepreneurship
Ecopreneurship
Start-up
companies
Finland
Lassi Linnanen is professor of environmental and quality management in the
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management at Helsinki
University of Technology. Before joining academia in 2000 he was chief
executive officer and co-founder of Gaia Group Ltd, a leading Finnish energy
and environmental management consultancy. His main research interests
include corporate responsibility strategies and system innovations for
sustainable development.
u
Department of Industrial
Engineering and Management,
Helsinki University of Technology,
Saimaankatu 11, 15140 Lahti,
Finland
!
lassi.linnanen@hut.fi
<
www.tuta.hut.fi
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 71
© 2002 Greenleaf Publishing http://www.greenleaf-publishing.com
s environmental entrepreneurship something different from ordinary
entrepreneurship? The right answer might be both no and yes. Most of the normal
entrepreneurial laws, such as the correlation between risk and profit, the right timing
for market entry and the need for adequate financial and human capital are valid also
in environmental ventures. To be successful, environmental entrepreneurs should
move fast, motivate others and take risks as well as anticipate and supply what large
numbers of people want. However, the values-based leadership often rightly associated
with environmental entrepreneurs gives a special flavour to these businesses.
In this paper, the phenomenon of ecopreneurship is examined from two different
sides. The practical side is that I have over ten years of personal experience in the creation
and management of environmentally oriented business ventures in Finland. This
experience is drawn on to provide many of the hands-on observations cited in the paper.
The second side is academic: I also hold a professorship in environmental and quality
management at Helsinki University of Technology and continue to support and advise
young academic entrepreneurs. All the recent start-ups with which I have been involved
also have something in common: a quest for more sustainable products and services.
Owing to the sensitive nature and confidentiality of the information behind the real-
life examples, most of the companies and individuals referred to in this paper will
remain anonymous.
Ecobusiness classification
Environmental businesses can be classified into four different segments. Each has a
distinctive character, and their emergence has been influenced by a different combi-
nation of drivers. Three main drivers for environmental business and technology can
be identified as follows:
t The geographical area of influence, ranging from local, to regional, to global. The
balance has shifted from local point-source pollution, such as waste-water treat-
ment, to global and more complex issues, such as climate change.
t Reason for market emergence, either by regulation or by voluntary decisions of
market actors. Besides the traditional command-and-control approach, market-
based instruments and voluntary actions have become increasingly important.
t Degree of enforcement, varying from high to low. The degree of enforcement differs
from country to country and from one law to another.
Thus, I am inclined to propose, on the premises of these drivers, that at least the
following four segments can be identified among environmental businesses:
t Nature-oriented enterprises. These are concerned with wildlife habitat preservation,
eco-tourism and other close-to-nature concepts that utilise economic and human
resources to improve the state of the environment.
t Producers of environmental technology. The production of such technology is
driven by legislative pressure on communities or industrial enterprises to reduce
their environmental load on water, air and soil.
t Providers of environmental management services. These aim to advise corporations
to utilise environmental excellence as a source of competitive edge.
lassi linnanen
72 GMI 38 Summer 2002
I
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 72
t Producers of environmentally friendly products. Such products are differentiated
from existing products by their better environmental performance over the product
life-cycle.
Table 1 summarises the drivers of these four environmental business segments.
Nature-oriented enterprises
The purest segment of environmental entrepreneurs might consist of those trying to
make their living through sustainable use of natural resources. Businesses in this
segment are often run by individuals with alternative lifestyles, or by otherwise dedicated
people to serve good causes. They offer voluntary and local means to practise environ-
mental resource management.
Producers of environmental technology
Public perception of environmental business is often limited to environmental technol-
ogy, an industry segment that is usually compliance-driven. The tightening of national
legislation is the most important driver of these firms. However, the importance of
market-based growth drivers is becoming more and more evident in environmental
technology businesses. The tightening of international regulation may result in less
binding agreements than seen in nationally enforced laws, but it will force global
businesses to react more quickly and voluntarily.
A typical eco-business situation with respect to environmental technology is to
overestimate the legislative push and to underestimate the market pull, as Case study 1
illustrates.
Providers of environmental management services
Environmental management services achieve their aim by taking into account environ-
mental protection criteria in all the company’s planning, implementation and control
activities, aiming at decreasing the environmental load and achieving long-term corpo-
rate objectives (Linnanen 1998). This industry segment includes but is not limited to
environmental management system consulting, environmental accounting and com-
GMI 38 Summer 2002 73
an insider’s experiences with environmental entrepreneurship
Driver
Segment
geographical
influence
reason for market
emergence
degree of
enforcement
Table 1 drivers of eco-business sectors
Nature-oriented
enterprises
Local Market Low
Environmental
technology
Local or regional Regulation High
Environmental
management services
Global Regulation and
market
Low
Environmental
products
Global Market Low
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 73
munication, legal services and life-cycle assessments (LCAs). More recently, environ-
mental management has expanded to cover the triple-bottom-line approach.
Producers of environmentally friendly products
Environmentally friendly products have markets as their driver. The demand for these
products is derived from the increasing environmental awareness of consumers. These
consumers constitute 10%–20% of all consumers in Western societies and have the
willingness to pay an environmental premium in the purchasing price (Peattie 1993).
In addition to environmental criteria, this differentiation can be achieved by social
criteria, such as the sale of fair-trade products.
Barriers to ecopreneurship
It appears that there are a few critical issues that successful ecopreneurs must address
and that conventional entrepreneurs do not. These can be classified into three broad
categories: (1) the challenge of market creation, (2) the finance barrier and (3) the ethical
justification for existence.
The challenge of market creation
The diffusion of environmental awareness is an important factor in supporting market
creation for environmental technology, products and services. The diffusion of environ-
mental awareness and, even more so, a change in consumer behaviour have proved to
be slow (Meffert and Kirchgeorg 1993). One potential explanation for this slowness lies
in the complicated nature of the sustainability challenge. Environmental management
and sustainable development are still fairly discredited concepts in public discourse and
it is therefore a natural inclination to require greater proof of these new and provocative
ideas than for the view already believed to be true (Sutton and Staw 1995).
One problem in communicating environmental problems is the difficulty in provid-
ing clear cause-and-effect relations. Consider the following imaginary example with
regard to carbon dioxide emissions:
When you drive a car to a local hypermarket you will add to global carbon dioxide
emissions, which contribute to global warming, which in turn might lead to food scarcity
lassi linnanen
74 GMI 38 Summer 2002
Case study 1 legislative push and market pull: tyre recycling
in the mid-1990s a start-up company planned to enter the market to
recycle rubber from waste tyres. At that time, a car-tyre recycling scheme was established in
Finland as a result of legislative measures. The company quite rightly assumed that there would
be an important and cheap material flow resulting from approximately three million waste tyres
per year. It prepared a production and investment plan for rubber sheets based on its patented
technology and on the expected price of the raw material. However, it failed to recognise the
fact that the remanufactured products, like all other products, do not automatically have
commercial value. There needs to be a market for them. After a more careful market study it
was revealed that the intended production capacity was approximately 100 times higher than
the existing market demand. Even with an annual growth rate of 100% in demand it would have
taken almost ten years to run the plant at full capacity. The investment would clearly have been
a failure, and the investment plan was cancelled.
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 74
as the conditions in many productive agricultural areas will decline and, therefore, your
food price rises in the long term. And, of course, you should calculate the fuel cost, which
has a direct impact on the price of your food.
When you hear the argumentation above for the first time, would you buy the idea and
reduce your driving in order to keep your food prices down? Considering the plausibility
of the causal relations, probably not. Luhmann (1988) argues that it is not possible for
a society to respond even to grave environmental problems until they become public by
means of the social communication system. Environmental threats become social
threats through communication. This socialisation of threats is also a prerequisite for
their elimination.
A newly established company always faces a major challenge: the good business idea
needs to be realised in practice. Market creation requires strong belief in the entrepre-
neur’s own vision and capabilities. The need to create a new market for new products
often proves difficult, as Case study 2 demonstrates.
When the market creation challenge is combined with high-level capital investments
to enable industrial-scale production, small companies often end up facing substantial
financial barriers to launching themselves and to growth (see Case study 3).
The finance barrier
On the one hand, environmental entrepreneurs with drive and ideas often find it difficult
to find investors who share their objectives and ideals. On the other hand, people
interested in direct investment in environmental businesses experience difficulties in
finding the enterprises they can believe in and support. Many environmental companies
GMI 38 Summer 2002 75
an insider’s experiences with environmental entrepreneurship
Case study 2 the timing of market entry: future trade in fresh water
a profound example of the challenges of timing one’s market entry
can be drawn from the fresh water trade. By logical deduction, this seems to be set to become
a huge market in the future. All the predictions argue that water availability is the world’s most
pressing resource issue, as fresh water is growing scarce amid competing human needs (e.g.
Doering et al. 2002). The demand is expected to rise, making margins higher, which, at a certain
threshold level, will make bulk shipments of fresh water profitable on a global scale. However,
it is next to impossible to predict when this threshold level will be achieved.
Case study 3 the challenge of market creation and high start-up costs: nanotechnology
nanotechnology is argued to be a potential future market for
supporting sustainable development. Staff at a technology centre developed a number of
nanotechnology innovations relating to the surface treatment of materials (atomic layer
epitaxy). The methods provide significant eco-efficiency potential in several areas of application
(e.g. through extension of product life). The business potential was recognised, resulting in a
spin-off company from an existing corporation. However, this company had hard times during
its first years of existence. The capital investments required were high, and there was no existing
market. Finally, a couple of industrial companies that were potential users of this new surface
technology in their products decided to acquire minority stakes in the company. This simul-
taneously gave the company a more solid financial ground and created a market channel.
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 75
seem to know little about the investment community, and many investors believe that
ecopreneurs lack knowledge about the realities of financial markets and fail to grasp the
investor’s interests. Whether these prejudices are justified or not, they create an obstacle
to placing and obtaining capital (
IISD 2002).
Many ecopreneurs express the need for a period of product development to reach a
market breakthrough that is longer than the period sought by typical venture capitalists,
who may seek to exit their investment after two to three years. This may be not enough
for eco-innovations to become commercially viable. As a result, environmental venture
capital is marginal. Randjelovic et al. (2002) have estimated the size of green venture
capital to be around 0.1% of mainstream venture capital. One venture capital executive
put it quite bluntly:
The environment may be a successful screening criterion to find possible growth
companies, but after that it does not influence [investment] decision making. The
problems and solutions are found from three areas: management, management and
management.
In the my experience, it is difficult to sell investors a novel business concept containing
positive environmental arguments. Stubbornness is needed to beat the resistance to
change (see Case study 4).
Case study 4 indicates an important trend. An emergent channel for ecopreneurs to
raise venture capital is the stock of high net worth investors (‘business angels’) who seek
sustainability-related investment because of their environmental and social beliefs and
the understanding of the potential double dividends (Randjelovic et al. 2002).
The ethical raison d’être
Financial and market considerations are essential to all entrepreneurs. Therefore,
maybe the most distinctive feature of many eco-businesses is their explicitly expressed
ethical reasoning. This has positive and negative effects on the business and its corporate
governance. The ethical dimension is a major issue to take into account when main-
streaming environmental businesses and innovations.
lassi linnanen
76 GMI 38 Summer 2002
Case study 4 overcoming resistance to change: the re-using of textbooks
a recent start-up company aimed to replace the distribution chain of
the high-school textbook market by re-using books. The business was especially interesting
because of the high profit margins and its effectiveness in reaching the customer with accurate
provision of books. The company’s core success factor is an information system that is
designed to gather the data as to where, when, what and how many books can be acquired and
are needed for the lessons for the next term. According to this information, the correct items
are taken to schools and the trading is organised through bookstore-like trading events. The
customer benefit is a significantly lower price combined with a better service. However, the
raising of finance for the company proved to be a difficult task as there was no prior example
of this earning logic. This raised doubts among venture capitalists. After several unsuccessful
approaches, a group of private investors were able to provide the needed 4 0.5 million finance
for the company to roll out the business to cover Finland.
Now, the concept has good prospects for future expansion both abroad and into other
products with similar features. An international survey made by the company has shown that
the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain and many other countries are possible markets, where
the opportunities to leverage know-how and information systems are frequent.
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 76
On the positive side, most of the ecopreneurs I have met are highly committed to
their business. Their reason for running an enterprise is not solely to make money but
involves also a willingness to make the world a better place in which to live. This personal
commitment also increases their marketing credibility and trustworthiness as business
partners.
Another issue is that sometimes this willingness to serve good purposes even exceeds
the desire to make money. Eco-businesses are indeed measured by multi-dimensional
success criteria, many of them being non-financial. The combination of fact-based and
value-based issues linked with various impact levels—from the individual level up to a
global level—leaves room for great diversity of performance indicators and makes it
difficult to define success. Integration of the financial and the ecological perspectives
has proved to be difficult, if not impossible. The current lack of clarity of sustainability
criteria leads use to the conclusion that ‘good business’ is continuously open to multiple
interpretations.
It is also possible to identify negative issues relating to an ethical raison d’être. First,
a quest for ethical excellence complicates management. For example, recruitment and
outplacement decisions are never easy, but they might be even more difficult in values-
led enterprises. In these enterprises, people coming in should naturally be talented and
productive but they must also show an ability to commit themselves to the world-
improving value base. Then, if the company faces a need to reduce its workforce, firing
people will be difficult, as there will be a tendency to take into account a wider variety
of factors than would be the case if the decision were based solely on rational reasoning.
Second, many of those companies with a high ethical profile seem to resemble non-
profit associations more than business organisations in their governance and decision-
making. A somewhat surprising link can be found between established family
enterprises and environmental enterprises. Mustakallio (2002) identifies family busi-
ness characteristics to have (1) a low mobility of shares and controlled ownership and
(2) an emotional dimension, with mixed self-interested and altruistic behaviours. Most
of ecopreneurs share these two characteristics.
The link between financial-sector values and ecopreneurial values deserves special
mention. It is sometimes unclear whether the entry of venture capitalists into eco-
businesses is solely a positive phenomenon. Too often, blind money-making intentions
overrule the ethical orientation that is one of the positive features of many ecopreneurs
(see Case study 5).
GMI 38 Summer 2002 77
an insider’s experiences with environmental entrepreneurship
Case study 5 venture capitalism and ecopreneurs: the small print that
compromised the ethical vision of the founders of an
environmental management software company
a provider of environmental management software applications
offers holistic solutions to its customers’ environmental management challenges by using web-
based technology, automating basic routines encountered in environmental management, such
as data collection. The business concept of this company is a lucrative mix of environmental
management and information technology, and the company’s initial start-up finance was easily
raised. Unfortunately, it soon transpired that the investor selected was interested only in the
human capital of the young entrepreneurs, not in developing the company itself. Soon after the
start-up stage, the investor announced a plan to employ these entrepreneurs directly. The
company may still prove to be a market and financial success, but it will happen at a high ethical
price. In this case, the young enterprise and its founders being forced to abandon their original
vision and values by strict contractual policy and by overuse of negotiation power was an
unwanted side-effect imported from the financial community.
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 77
Developing a typology of environmental entrepreneurs
Several definitions of ecopreneurship can be found in the literature. Some of them have
a rather limited scope. For example, Anderson and Leal (1997: 3) define ecopreneurship
as ‘entrepreneurs using business tools to preserve open space, develop wildlife habitat,
save endangered species and generally improve environmental quality’. Schuyler (1998)
provides a more generic definition by stating that ‘the term ecopreneurs has been coined
for entrepreneurs whose business efforts are not only driven by profit, but also by a
concern for the environment’.
Taking into account the considerations outlined in the above discussion, ecopreneurs
can be classified according to two criteria: (1) their desire to change the world and to
improve the quality of the environment and life, and (2) their desire to make money and
grow as a business venture. These two dimensions seem to be independent. The first
dimension of pursuing the ‘good life’, like sustainability, is an acceptable goal as such
but it is primarily an inefficient business concept. It is often argued in management
practice that the more focused the business idea, the better it is in terms of commercial suc-
cess. The second dimension emerges from a reasonable assumption that economic
success factors are no different in ecobusinesses than they are in any other business.
Successful ecopreneurs are expected to move fast, takes risks with prospective gains,
motivate others and to anticipate and supply what large numbers of people want.
A typology of environmental entrepreneurs is shown in Table 2. The elements of this
typology are analysed in the following sections.
Self-employer
An important factor among ecopreneurs who do not prosper financially is an unwilling-
ness to grow. Many of these companies have been born as an alternative to the dream
of continuous growth usually found in ‘normal’ business enterprises. Among this type
of ecopreneurs there is often a low desire to proceed along the same path and ‘to repeat
the same mistakes the capitalist system always does when assuming an infinite and
ever-growing system’. It is self-evident that substantial growth will not take place without
entrepreneurial drive. It should also be borne in mind that the majority of small-scale
entrepreneurs are self-employers. They are satisfied with a level of cash flow that is
sufficient to guarantee a reasonable living standard. Out of the four eco-business
segments presented earlier, ecopreneurs who advocate nature-oriented business ideas
are most likely to belong to this category.
Non-profit business
Among this type of ecopreneur, the distinction between business and non-profit
organisational roles is often unclear. They usually have a strong commitment to change
lassi linnanen
78 GMI 38 Summer 2002
Desire to make money
low high
Table 2 drivers of eco-business sectors
high
Non-profit business Successful idealist
low
Self-employer Opportunist
Desire to change
the world
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 78
existing business and consumer behaviour. However, good citizenship often overtakes
the quest for high-performance financial results. In other words, these people often have
a high willingness to influence society but a low willingness to grow. A typical example
of such an enterprise is a sustainability think-tank; these tend to remain as fairly small
expert organisations but which have an influence much bigger than their size.
Opportunist
Opportunists are rather recent entrants among ecopreneurs. They typically have a
professional background in traditional industries or they are ‘ordinary’ entrepreneurs
expanding into ecobusiness in order to increase their profits. Driven by pure economic
considerations, their business ideas are not linked to changes in the entrepreneur’s
value base. Opportunists tend to be involved in environmental technology, which
provides the most direct promise for economies of scale.
Successful idealist
Taking the growth leap needs an internal ambition, and sometimes ecopreneurs suc-
ceed. The successful ecopreneur builds a dynamic equilibrium between two virtues:
making money and making the world better. These ecopreneurs could be labelled as
successful idealists. Their desire to improve the world leads to motivation to create
markets. The cycle is enforced by positive feedback from customers and other stake-
holders, providing additional momentum for positive business results and further
strengthening the entrepreneurial motivation. This virtuous cycle is illustrated in Figure 1.
Conclusions and discussion
Environmental entrepreneurs share many features with other entrepreneurs. Similar
to mainstream businesses, the ecopreneurial success cycle is quite unstable and can
easily shift to be a vicious cycle. The less successful cycle does not emerge or collapse
as a result of good intentions but because of failure in the market test. Consequently,
this decreases motivation, paralyses further development of competence and impairs
the ability to serve markets. However, a few differences can be seen between ecopreneurs
and other entrepreneurs. Market creation is even more difficult for environmental
business ideas than it is for non-environmental business ideas, because the financial
community may not yet be mature enough to finance environmental innovations, and
GMI 38 Summer 2002 79
an insider’s experiences with environmental entrepreneurship
Desire to improve
the world
Positive feedback
from stakeholders
Motivation to create
markets
Business growth
Figure 1 the virtuous cycle of ecopreneurship
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 79
the role of ethical reasoning creates confusion within the mainstream business commu-
nity.
Perhaps the most distinctive feature of many ecobusinesses is their explicitly expressed
ethical reasoning. Being highly ethical brings with it certain difficulties in today’s
business culture, which is dominated by a mistaken assumption that most decisions are
value-free. Luckily, these attitudes are gradually softening as socially responsible
investments and other value-driven commercial successes demonstrate the win–win
option. Hall (2001: 19) describes a responsible entrepreneur in the following terms:
The popular thinking was that to succeed one must be tough, selfish and ready to do
whatever it takes to beat the other side...to the contrary, many entrepreneurs who are
nice, decent people build better relationships and, in turn, accomplish great things for
that very reason.
There is also one other factor that helps partially explain why the creation of
environmentally driven markets is difficult. The barrier arises from the inherently
different logic between academia and the business community. Companies and their
managers often expect some kind of prescriptive recommendations to be drawn from
research. Entrepreneurs tend to look for specific examples of successful management
and an inventory of success stories as well as suitable tools for use when one aspires to
success. In contrast, academic researchers and policy-makers are more interested in
consistent and systematic data on environmental performance and in the drivers of
change. What appears as an interesting success story of environmental management
for a businessperson might only ‘add yet another case study to the literature’ in the eyes
of an academic. Such an imbalance of expectations does not make the complex issue
any easier and needs to be addressed.
References
Anderson, T.L., and D.R. Leal (1997) Enviro-capitalists: Doing Good while Doing Well (Lanham,
MD:
Rowman & Littlefield).
Doering, D.S., A. Cassara, C. Layke, J. Ranganathan, C. Revenga, D. Tunstall and W. Vanasselt (2002)
Tomorrow’s Markets: Global Trends and their Implications for Business (Washington, DC: World
Resources Institute).
Hall, G. (2001) The Responsible Entrepreneur (Franklin Lakes, NJ
: Career Press).
IISD
(International Institute for Sustainable Development) (2002) ‘Perception Barriers’, www.bsdglobal.
com/markets/rm_barriers.asp, accessed 31 August 2002.
Linnanen, L. (1998) Essays on Environmental Value Chain Management: The Challenge of Sustainable
Development (Studies in Computer Science, Economics and Statistics, 46; Jyväskylä, Finland:
University of Jyväskylä).
Luhmann, N. (1988) Ecological Communication (Cambridge,
UK: Polity Press).
Meffert, H., and M. Kirchgeorg (1993) Marktorientiertes Umweltmanagement: Grundlagen und Fallstudien
(Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel).
Mustakallio, M.A. (2002) Contractual and Relational Governance in Family Firms: Effects on Strategic
Decision-making Quality and Firm Performance (doctoral dissertation, Institute of Strategy and
International Business, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland).
Peattie, K. (1993) Green Marketing (London: Pitman).
Randjelovic, J., A.R. O’Rourke and R. Orsato (2002) ‘The Emergence of Green Venture Capital’, paper
presented at the Greening of Industry Network Conference, Göteborg, Sweden, 23–26 June 2002.
Schuyler, G. (1998) ‘Merging Economic and Environmental Concerns through Ecopreneurship’, CELCEE
Kauffman Centre for Entrepreneurial Leadership Clearinghouse on Entrepreneurship Education Digest
98.8, www.celcee.edu/publications/digest/Dig98-8.html, accessed 3 March 2003.
Sutton, R., and B. Staw (1995) ‘What Theory is Not’, Administrative Science Quarterly, September 1995:
371-84.
q
lassi linnanen
80 GMI 38 Summer 2002
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 80
... La littérature sur l'entrepreneuriat durable peut être organisée en fonction du niveau d'analyse investi par les chercheurs. Premièrement, le niveau individuel met l'accent sur les connaissances, compétences, motivations, intentions, valeurs et attitudes des entrepreneurs durables (Koe et al., 2014;Shepherd et al., 2013;Schaltegger and Wagner, 2011;De Clerc and Voronov, 2011;Parrish, 2010;Kirkwood and Walton, 2010;Patzelt and Shepherd, 2010;Shepherd et al., 2009;De Clerc and Voronov, 2009;Choi and Gray, 2008;Schlange, 2006;Choi and Gray, 2004;Linnanen, 2002;Walley and Taylor, 2002). Deuxièmement, le niveau organisationnel s'intéresse à la façon dont l'entrepreneuriat durable est construit, en insistant sur les mécanismes de reconnaissance d'opportunités et de processus entrepreneurial (Muñoz and Cohen, 2017;Dean and McMullen, 2007;Cohen and Winn, 2007;Schich et al., 2002;Larson, 2000;Hostager et al., 1998). ...
... First, a stream of research focuses on the individual level. Sustainable entrepreneurs are studied under the lens of their knowledge, skills, motivation, intention, business orientation, values and attitudes (Koe et al., 2014;Shepherd et al., 2013;Schaltegger and Wagner, 2011;De Clerc and Voronov, 2011;Parrish, 2010;Kirkwood and Walton, 2010;Patzelt and Shepherd, 2010;Shepherd et al., 2009;De Clerc and Voronov, 2009;Choi and Gray, 2008;Schlange, 2006;Choi and Gray, 2004;Linnanen, 2002;Walley and Taylor, 2002). ...
Thesis
Full-text available
Traditionally known for their contribution to innovation and the economy, startups are now considered promising organizations for addressing social and environmental issues. However, turning to startups is not straightforward. Not only does such an expectation add to the already challenging task of launching a startup, but the contribution of startups to sustainability is difficult to determine due to the uncertainty that characterizes them. Therefore, the aim of this research is to explore how startups tackle sustainability given the significant uncertainty. While the literature has extensively explored the practices of large companies, little information is available for smaller ones. According to the literature, they not only face less pressure from stakeholders but also seem to perceive fewer benefits in engaging in sustainable development. The field of sustainable entrepreneurship has begun to fill this gap, but the specific case of startups remains largely overlooked. Providing such knowledge is crucial not only for startups but also for their stakeholders and decision-makers who currently lack information on what to expect from startups in terms of social and environmental impact. So far, research has demonstrated the complexity of the subject and suggested frameworks for assessing their contribution to sustainability. However, startups’ perspective is lacking, especially on how they tackle in the absence of shared norms and practices in the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Given the novelty and complexity of the phenomenon, an exploratory approach was favored. A 36-month action research in an incubator of young innovative startups allowed the collection of various types of data, including direct observations, interviews, and archival documents. Instead of aiming for generalization, this qualitative and comprehensive approach seeks to reveal the practices, challenges, and trade-offs of the actors to better understand the mechanisms at play and how actions are taken. The research drew inspiration from issues met on the field, following an abductive process where surprises led to the identification of sub-research questions. The results are articulated around three research articles, highlighting different aspects of the phenomenon. Sustainability for startups is seen as part of the entrepreneurial process (1), as embedded into an entrepreneurial ecosystem (2), and as a new requirement demanded by public actors (3). The immersive framework revealed that actors acted in favor of sustainability based on the meaning they attributed to this still abstract concept, and that this meaning continually evolved through an interactive and interpretative process. Such a symbolic interactionist perspective enriches the literature by proposing an original approach to describing the management of uncertainty in a complex problem. By combining the results of the three research articles, the thesis focused on an entrepreneurial ecosystem in transition and suggested a new definition for sustainable startups. In line with the collective and contextual approach, the research mobilized the concept of improvisation to emphasize that sustainability for startups is not a static object, leading startups to consider their changing environment. The processual approach contributed to both the literature on sustainable entrepreneurship and the emerging field of research on evaluating the impact of sustainability for startups. Practical recommendations for startups and decision-makers were also provided.
... A few other investigations have noted the market as a challenge, explaining that there is a lack of market awareness of eco, green and sustainable products and services. Moreover, consumer resistance results in consumers not being inclined to adopt a positive attitude towards such products (Linnanen, 2002;Pastakia, 2002). As a result, it is a challenge for the eco-entrepreneurs to remain motivated to pursue their case, which could further harm the reputation of the eco-venture (Dixon and Clifford, 2007). ...
... Investors are often doubtful of the eco-entrepreneurs' knowledge of finance, which makes it difficult for the entrepreneur to pitch novel business ideas based on environmental arguments (Bergset, 2015). Moreover, studies have highlighted that social, sustainable or eco-entrepreneurs' motivation to make the world a better place often exceeds their desire to make money (Bergset, 2018;Hoogendoorn et al., 2019;Linnanen, 2002). Some other articles spotlight the innovative nature of this sector or the consequences induced by environmental measures and regulations (Hoogendoorn et al., 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Through this review, our key intention is to capture interest and advance research on eco-entrepreneurship. We examine the literature on eco-entrepreneurship and highlight that research on eco-entrepreneurship has received limited attention, and thus, several areas remain underexplored. Therefore, scholarly contributions were invited to interrogate, challenge, and debate current understanding of the topic in an effort to develop solutions to unanswered questions. The contributions chosen for this issue comprise of three studies on eco-entrepreneurship, that complement each other in terms of the topic of investigation and the context of the study. The studies share an understanding of how eco-entrepreneurship is stimulated, how decision-making in such hybrid ventures could be triggered and what alternative financing strategies could be adopted by eco-ventures. In addition, our review contributes by emphasizing areas in eco-entrepreneurship that need research attention.
... For investments involving potential environmental concerns, it should be universally recognised that moneymaking can no longer be central to such endeavours. As Linnanen (2016) asserted, the reason for investments should not be solely to generate profits but to make the world a better place to live. Indeed, this inclination to do good can surpass that of making higher returns (Linnanen, 2016). ...
... As Linnanen (2016) asserted, the reason for investments should not be solely to generate profits but to make the world a better place to live. Indeed, this inclination to do good can surpass that of making higher returns (Linnanen, 2016). Hence, non-financial factors such as moral virtue should be considered critical and pertinent in any investment that can potentially contribute to climate hazards. ...
Article
Full-text available
The fundamental view that investors require compensation aligned to the risk attributes they discern in their investments runs at odds with efforts to curb climate risks. Moral considerations should play an important role in climate-related investments (Hulme, 2014). However, in the case of fossil fuel investments, the moral virtues in decisions are blurred. This article aims to determine the extent of moral virtues in investment decisions involving fossil fuels amidst risk-return principles. Document analysis is used from a population of 60 banks identified as increasing or reducing fossil fuel financing from the Cable News Network website. In addition to a random sampling of banks, market prices, and ten-year government bonds data are obtained from Macrotrends and Yahoo.com websites to compute the cost of equity over a seven- year period using the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). The t-test proves that the required returns for increasing fossil fuel financing remain higher than those for decreasing, while regression reflects that the moral virtue gap remains an existential threat to climate mitigation. These results demonstrate that the curbing of climate risks remains elusive unless investors place moral considerations above monetary returns. In conclusion, the need for adequate monetary compensation for investing in fossil fuels far outweighs the moral obligation.
... There are challenges faced by ecopreneurs in balancing the environment and a viable business economy [4]. Ecopreneurs can balance between the environment and business, it seems to depend on each individual's situation [112]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Ecopreneurship is about producing environmentally friendly products and technologies, where innovation and market orientation align with sustainability and ecological awareness. Ecopreneurship is important because environmental innovation is a potential competitive advantage. However, there are still many parties who do not know, understand, apply, and practice the principles of ecopreneurship properly, which can create sustainable businesses. No comprehensive research on ecopreneurship principles has been conducted. The purpose of this study is to comprehensively explore the principles of ecopreneurship for sustainable business practices. This research uses a library research method using critical analysis techniques. Researchers review various reputable references that discuss ecopreneurship, then conduct an in-depth analysis of ecopreneurship to find its principles. After many ecopreneurship principles were discovered, these ecopreneurship principles were then categorized into main principles. The research results explain that ecopreneurship concept is based on three pillars, namely: innovation, concern for the environment, and long-term sustainability. The research results found 28 ecopreneurship principles which were categorized into 6 main principles: environmental principles, business principles, ethical principles, benefit to society principles, circular economy principles, and sustainable principles. By implementing ecopreneurship principles comprehensively, it will contribute to community development (through the benefit to society principles). This will create a circular economic model (through the circular economy principles), so that it will increase sustainable business (through sustainable principles). This research can be used as a practical recommendation for entrepreneurs and policy makers, and it is hoped that future research areas can investigate how the principles of ecopreneurship are applied in various industries.
... Meanwhile, many studies investigate the reasons behind and methods by which entrepreneurs choose to take opposing positions in GE (Middermann, Kratzer, and Perner 2020). For example, entrepreneurs may face dilemma considering the numerous obstacles like market barriers (which refer to consumer ignorance of environmental protection); financing barriers (which include high investment costs and a lack of funding and ethical barriers (which refer to a lack of moral reasoning and attitude towards environmental protection), etc. (Linnanen 2002). The scenario is more nuanced in the context of SMEs in developing countries where entrepreneurs are preoccupied with profit maximization goals (Asad et al. 2024). ...
Article
Full-text available
Globally, businesses are required to develop capabilities that enable them to respond to sustainability demands. In the current context of the digitally evolving entrepreneurship scenario, the study investigates the role of digital capabilities (DCs) for the green entrepreneurship (GE) potential of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) while considering the underlying effects of an organization's strategic agility (SA). The study's data came from a survey of 136 SMEs in Saudi Arabia, where digitalization and sustainable development-are positioned as twin transitions for transforming the SME sector. The data analysis results from partial least square structural equation modelling (SmartPLS 3.0) revealed that DCs have no direct impact on the GE potential of SMEs. However, the findings support SA as both directly influencing the GE and positively moderating the DCs-GE relationship in SMEs. As a result, the study produces new theoretical and practical implications underpinning digitization and GE in the contemporary sustainability context.
Article
This article contributes to a deeper understanding of the role of capitalism in sustainability transitions by exploring the potential of green entrepreneurs to cultivate alternative economic forms. To this end, we will introduce the classic sociological concept of the spirit of capitalism to sustainability transition research and bring it into dialogue with the concept of economic alterity. Based on qualitative case studies of nine green entrepreneurs, we examine how sustainability motives and capitalist meaning structures are blended in the mindsets of the ecopreneurs. Overall, the economic mentalities of the green ecopreneurs we examined can be characterised as a “green spirit of capitalism”, in the sense of a positive interconnection between capitalist principles and environmental goals. While the ecopreneurs repeatedly broke with capitalist principles in specific situations – for example by sacrificing growth potential or competitive advantages in favour of positive environmental impact – in none of the case studies was the capitalist economic mentality surmounted in any substantial way. This is due to specific stabilisation mechanisms belonging to the capitalist spirit that consolidate the respondents’ economic mentalities in cases of conflict between environmental and economic goals.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Dünyada özellikle yaşanan küresel ısınmayla iklim değişikliği olayları üzerinden ortaya çıkan çevre problemleri, yeşil dönüşüm uygulamalarını harekete geçirmiştir. Bu dönüşüm ile çevresel durumlara duyarlı, farkında ve sorumlu davranış ile beraber sürdürülebilirlik kavramı ön plana çıkmaktadır. Genellikle çevresel problemlerin temelinde ekonomik unsurların olması, çevresel problemlerin de bütün beşeri faaliyetleri etkilemesi çevrenin korunması ve onun üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerinin kontrol edilmesini mecbur hale getirmektedir. Bu doğrultuda, çevreye duyarlı ekonomik faaliyette bulunacak ekonomik hedefleri uygulamaya koyarken sosyal hedef ve amaçları da göz önünde bulunduracak yeşil girişimciler ön planda yer almaktadır. Yeşil girişimcilik, çevresel problemlerin ele alınarak, çevre dostu girdileri kullanmayı, temiz imalat süreçlerini, geri dönüşümü ve atık yönetimini olumlu bir etkiye dönüştürecek unsurları içermektedir. Yeşil girişimciliğin gelişmesinin önündeki engeller girişimcilerin bu alana yönelmesini zorlaştırmaktadır. Lojistik işletmelerinde yeşil girişimciliğin önündeki engellerin karar kriterlerinin önem derecesinin ortaya konulmasının amaçlandığı bu çalışmada yapılan araştırma sonucunda yeşil girişimciliğin önündeki engellerin en önemlileri sırasıyla “Finansal Engeller”, “Çevre Dostu Ürün ve Hizmetlere Karşı Bilinç İle İlgi Eksikliği” ile “Yönetim (hükümet) Bakış Açısı ve Pazar Dinamikleri” olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Öte yandan “Bürokratik Sistem ve Kültürel Farklılıklar” ve “Yatırımcı Bulma Problemi ve Paydaş Bulma Zorluğu” faktörleri ise en az önemli kriterler olduğu saptanmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Yeşil Girişimcilik, SWARA, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleri.
Chapter
Today, companies are faced with the need to transform their business models to be more sustainable and responsible. It is no longer enough to focus solely on economic profit, but it is necessary to take a more holistic view that also encompasses social and environmental well-being. Companies that succeed in integrating sustainability into their business strategy are laying the foundation for a new paradigm in the markets. The emergence of ‘conscious enterprises' stands out as a transformative driving force. These organizations, committed to sustainability and green business, not only seek financial profitability, but also strive to leave a positive footprint on the world around them. Challenging competition in contemporary markets goes beyond simple business strategy; it involves taking a holistic approach to social and environmental responsibility, which is why conscientious companies recognize that their success is not only measured in terms of revenue and market share, but also by the positive impact they generate on society and the natural environment.
Article
Full-text available
zet Sanayi devrimi ile birlikte artan ve ülkenin gelişmişlik düzeylerinde önemli rol oynayan girişimcilik faaliyetleri, çevre sorunlarının gündeme gelmesine neden olmuştur. Çevre sorunlarının problem olması zamanla ülkeleri harekete geçirmiş ve bu nedenle sürdürülebilir kalkınmaya uyum kapsamında sürdürülebilir çözüm önerilerinin geliştirilmesini öngören politika ve uygulamalar düzenlenmiştir. Bu bağlamda işletmelerin girişimcilik faaliyetlerinde ekolojiyi benimseyerek ürün, hizmet ve üretim süreçlerinin çevresel yaklaşıma uygun olarak tasarlanması anlamına gelen ekogirişimcilik, özellikle son zamanlarda büyük önem kazanmıştır. İşletmelerin ekogirişimcilik faaliyetlerini yönetim politikası olarak benimsemesi ve bu çerçevede sürdürülebilir (temiz) üretim gerçekleştirmesi çevreye olan tahribatı azaltmakta aynı zamanda sürdürülebilir kalkınmaya uyumu da kolaylaştırmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Arçelik Buzdolabı Fabrikasının çevre konularına yaklaşımı doğrultusunda benimsediği politika ve gerçekleştirdiği ekogirişimci faaliyetlerin üretim süreçlerine ve işletme performansına etkilerini ortaya koymaktır. Çalışma kapsamında, şirketin ekogirişimcilik algısını ölçmek ve Arçelik Buzdolabı Fabrikasında yapılan sürdürülebilir (temiz) üretim faaliyetlerini belirlemek için yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşme formu ile analiz yapılmıştır. Ayrıca işletmelerin sürdürülebilirliği ve ekogirişimciliğini tespit etmek adına Arçelik Eskişehir Kampüsünün ekolojik ayakizi hesaplanmıştır. Değerlendirme sonucunda Arçelik'in gerek ulusal gerekse uluslararası mevzuata uyumu, benimsediği çevre politikaları ve bu kapsamda gerçekleştirdiği ekogirişimci faaliyetlerle sürdürülebilir (temiz) üretim uygulamaları gerçekleştirebilmek adına alt yapı oluşturduğu ve bu yönde çalışmalar yaptığı tespit edilmiştir. Yapılan bu araştırmayla işletmenin diğer sanayi kuruluşlarına örnek olması amaçlanmaktadır.
Book
Full-text available
La transizione dei modelli di approvvigionamento di energia è un tema di estrema attualità e punto di snodo imprescindibile per ragionare su quale transizione ecologica ed eco-sociale è possibile immaginare e attuare. Il passaggio da un modello tradizionale di produzione di energia centrato su fonti fossili a uno incentrato sulla produzione diffusa da fonti rinnovabili ed efficienza energetica è al centro del dibattito pubblico poiché strettamente connesso con il cambiamento climatico, la decarbonizzazione, la sostenibilità del modello di sviluppo dominante e non da ultimi la sicurezza degli approvvigionamenti energetici e gli equilibri geopolitici. Da più parti si sottolinea la necessità di concepire una transizione energetica ripensata non solo dai governi e dalle istituzioni ma co-progettata grazie al coinvolgimento della società civile nelle sue differenti forme, allargando le dimensioni della partecipazione democratica. Ciò è stato recentemente riconosciuto anche dalle politiche europee e nazionali in particolare con l’approvazione della direttiva sulle comunità energetiche rinnovabili (Direttiva 2018/2001). Dal punto di vista sociologico appare quindi cruciale estendere l’analisi della transizione al contributo che la società civile può dare facendosi promotrice di innovazioni sociali. Il presente volume cerca di fare ciò riunendo diversi saggi di esperte/i del mondo accademico, di stakeholder e practitioner, che si interrogano sul concetto e sulle pratiche di democrazia energetica, sulle forme di azione collettiva sull’energia e sui vantaggi e limiti delle comunità energetiche esistenti e future. Punto di partenza è una ricerca-azione intitolata “Energie di gruppo. Il consumo partecipato di energia rinnovabile per un modello innovativo di economia locale”, promossa da Adiconsum Verona, dalle Università di Verona e Trento tra 2019 e 2020 con lo scopo di investigare il ruolo dei consumatori in esperienze di consumo-produzione collettiva e allo stesso tempo di costituire gruppi di acquisto di energia.
Article
Innovative financing mechanisms are needed to facilitate sustainable development. In the past few years, socially responsible investments have emerged as a successful type of financing scheme but many eco-oriented start-up companies remain under-funded. Apparently, environmental innovations have only recently caught the attention of an important financial sector: venture capital (VC). The article describes the emerging phenomenon of environment-related VC (or green VC) and provides an overview of the current market for this type of investment. The paper delves into this industry, revealing its characteristics, processes and mechanisms. The study also uncovers the main problems faced by eco-entrepreneurs as well as venture capitalists interested in this type of venture. Finally, it analyses the drivers for green VC and attempts to identify the sources of innovation and the uniqueness of these emerging financial products. Based on the analysis, the paper also derives a definition of green VC. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Article
There is growing concern with how science and modern society can cope with major problems, especially those of an ecological kind. This has grown in parallel with a skepticism which questions our processes of rational decision making, questions our ability to plan, and questions our cognitive capacity for prediction and directing action. Faced with these problems, the scientific establishment demands more investment to increase levels of knowledge. It maintains that we can change and master the environment. But the way forward is to recognize the increasing uncertainties we face. Some theoretical development is possible in this area owing to the study of risk, but this needs generalizing to the level of society. An attempt is made in the final section to assimilate this particular theoretical approach with ideas in evolutionary theory.
Article
Thesis (doctoral)--University of Jyväskylä, 1998. Includes bibliographical references.
Tomorrow's Markets: Global Trends and their Implications for Business
  • D S Doering
  • A Cassara
  • C Layke
  • J Ranganathan
  • C Revenga
  • D Tunstall
  • W Vanasselt
Doering, D.S., A. Cassara, C. Layke, J. Ranganathan, C. Revenga, D. Tunstall and W. Vanasselt (2002) Tomorrow's Markets: Global Trends and their Implications for Business (Washington, DC: World Resources Institute).
The Responsible Entrepreneur
  • G Hall
Hall, G. (2001) The Responsible Entrepreneur (Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press).
Merging Economic and Environmental Concerns through Ecopreneurship', CELCEE Kauffman Centre for Entrepreneurial Leadership Clearinghouse on Entrepreneurship Education Digest 98
  • G Schuyler
Schuyler, G. (1998) 'Merging Economic and Environmental Concerns through Ecopreneurship', CELCEE Kauffman Centre for Entrepreneurial Leadership Clearinghouse on Entrepreneurship Education Digest 98.8, www.celcee.edu/publications/digest/Dig98-8.html, accessed 3 March 2003.
The Emergence of Green Venture Capital', paper presented at the Greening of Industry Network Conference
  • J Randjelovic
  • A R O 'rourke
  • R Orsato
Randjelovic, J., A.R. O'Rourke and R. Orsato (2002) 'The Emergence of Green Venture Capital', paper presented at the Greening of Industry Network Conference, Göteborg, Sweden, 23–26 June 2002.