ArticlePDF Available

The Dutch Anomaly: Appointed Mayors, Can Appointed Mayors Cope with Role Changes and Societal Demands?


In almost all countries in Western Europe mayors are local political leaders, whether elected directly by the local citizenry or by the local council. Dutch mayors, however, constitute a deviant case. Since the beginning of the nineteenth century central government appoints them from outside the local political elite; hence they are neither local nor political. Such a way of appointing the mayor easily could give one the impression there has been little dynamism in the mayors role and position during the past decades. That however turns out to be a serious misunderstanding. The office of mayor in the Netherlands was and is the subject to serious change. While the office still carries a lot of ‘natural’ authority (although diminishing), its content – responsibilities, interdependencies, expectations – has changed rather drastically. Mayors have more or less become modern professional administrators even though they consolidated some of the traditional advantages of their office.In this paper we first of all will give a brief overview of the mayoral office in Western Europe, applying typologies that have been developed in recent studies. Then we will sketch the Dutch mayorship, its history as well as the selection procedures. The next step is to discuss recent developments. Three kinds of developments are relevant. First of all changes in the selection procedures, as a result of which the local councils have gained an almost decisive influence on the actual selection of their mayor. Second development is the significant increase of the mayors’ capacities and responsibilities. Thirdly, society seems to demand stronger leadership and to focus on the mayors in this quest. Tensions between these developments, and between the responses to them, are likely to emerge. We will explore the ways present mayors cope with those tensions.Questions then are, whether tensions arise between the various developments in the mayoral office and if so, which tensions; which mechanisms exist to cope with those tensions; how the way mayors get their job (appointment with strong local influence) affects the coping mechanisms, and what risks the mayorship runs (for instance from a democratic angle).
A preview of the PDF is not available
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
The relationship between citizens and local decision makers is a long standing policy pre-occupation and has often been the subject of debate by politicians across parties. Recent governments have sought to empower, activate and give responsibility to some citizens, while other groups have been abandoned or ignored. Drawing on extensive up-to-date empirical work by leading researchers in the field, “Changing local governance, changing citizens” aims to explain what debates about local governance mean for local people. Questions addressed include: what new demands are being made on citizens and why? Which citizens are affected and how have they responded? What difference do changing forms of local governance make to people’s lives? The book explores governance and citizenship in relation to multiculturalism, economic migration, community cohesion, housing markets, neighbourhoods, faith organisations, behaviour change and e-democracy in order to establish a differentiated, contemporary view of the ways that citizens are constituted at the local level today. “Changing local governance, changing citizens” provides a pertinent and robustly empirical contribution to current debates amongst policy makers, academics, practitioners and local communities about how to respond to this changing policy framework. It will be of interest to post-graduate students and academic researchers in politics, public and social policy, sociology, local government and urban studies, as well as policy makers and practitioners.
This book brings together recent empirical analyses of renegotiating the roles of citizens and their relationships to public governance in different contexts. It looks at the different ways in which citizens are conceptualised in local governance; the new demands they are facing from local governance; and how they themselves perceive and respond to these changes and demands. The book reports empirical and applied citizen-centred research in local governance including multiculturalism, economic migration, community cohesion, housing markets, neighbourhoods, faith organisations, behaviour change, and children's services, to establish a differentiated, contemporary view of the ways that citizens are constituted at the local level today.
With this book we aim at describing and analysing the selection, daily life, networks and values of local top political leaders in seventeen European countries. The empirical nourishment to the investigation into town halls across Europe is a survey conducted in 2003 with mayors and corresponding top local political leaders. The data covering responses from 2700 leaders is a unique and rich material allowing descriptions and analyses pursuing a number of lines of inquiry. © VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2006.
Western European countries differ according to the ways in which they organise local government, not least in the manner in which mayors are selected and in the mayors' statutory positions and responsibilities. The question is to what extent is mayoral performance affected by selection procedures and the statutory position of the mayoral office? In two exploratory articles, the results of a number of comparative empirical studies will be presented. In this first part the focus will be on the theoretical and methodological framework of the study, and on the variations in selection procedures and statutory positions. In the second part (to be published in the next issue of this journal) we will relate these findings to evidence on mayoral performance.
Book Vital Democracy outlines a theory of democracy in action, based on four elementary forms of democracy - pendulum, consensus, voter and participatory democracy - that are thoroughly analysed, compared and related to both the literature and the real world of democracy. Just like a few primary colours produce an array of shades, a few basic models of democracy appear, the author argues, to constitute a wide range of democratic variants in real life. Focusing on tried and tested democratic institutions, Frank Hendriks shows that the four models of democracy - with their divergent patterns of leadership, citizenship and governance, their inherent strengths and weaknesses - are never purely instantiated. He argues that wherever democracy is practiced with some level of success, it is always as hybrid democracy, thereby challenging those democratic reformers and theorists that have inspired the quest for democratic purity. Vital Democracy builds on Arend Lijphart's well-known work which distinguishes between majoritarian and consensual democratic countries but also goes well beyond it, urging attention to non-national, non-formal, and non-representative expressions of democracy as well.