ArticlePDF Available

Reaching the Visual Learner: Teaching Property Through Art

Authors:
  • Chiricahua Apache Nation

Abstract

Learning theorists have demonstrated that people vary in the manner in which they absorb, process, and recall what they are taught. Verbal learners, a group that constitutes about 30% of the general population, learn by hearing. They benefit from class lectures and from discussion of class materials in study groups or in oral presentations, but chafe at written assignments. Experiential learners - about 5% of the population - learn by doing and touching, and clinical work, role-playing exercises, and moot court are their best instructional modalities. Visual learners - the remaining 65% of the population - need to see what they are learning, and while they have difficulty following oral lectures they perform well at written assignments and readily recall material they have read. The implications of variance in learning styles are particularly significant for legal educators. Empirical research supports the conclusions that when students are matched with teaching methods that complement their learning styles their absorption and retention is significantly enhanced. However, law professors who rely upon the Socratic method or more traditional lecturing techniques, as do the majority of those who teach doctrinal courses, particularly in the first-year curriculum, may be satisfying the pedagogical needs of their verbal learners without adequately engaging their kinesthetic or visual students, who comprise a majority of their classes. Students for whom traditional teaching methods are unsatisfactory may not only learn less but may suffer motivational problems and enjoy the law school experience less than their peers. Moreover, variations in learning styles have been linked to gender: women tend to be more visually oriented than men, who are generally more kinesthetic, and consequently female students are systematically more prone to suffer the deleterious effects of learning style-teaching method mismatch than men. However, sixteen years after the American Bar Association Commission on Women in the Profession suggested to law schools that the first-year curriculum would be improved by the use of greater variety of teaching methods in light of the diversity of learning styles in the student body, the typical first-year doctrinal course remains a predominantly verbal domain. In some degree this is a function of the subject matter. After all, law is a bibliocentric profession, and words are the coin of the realm. But we need not seek the radical transformation of the law to teach to the entire class. This Article presents empirical evidence demonstrating that the use of original art can assist legal educators to this end.
Prof. William C. Bradford
John S. Grimes Fellow and Dean’s Fellow
Indiana University School of Law
530 W. New York Street, #322
Indianapolis, Indiana
(317) 274-4884
REACHING THE VISUAL LEARNER: TEACHING PROPERTY THROUGH ART
Learning theorists have demonstrated that people vary in the manner in which they
absorb, process, and recall what they are taught. Verbal learners, a group that constitutes about
30% of the general population, learn by hearing. They benefit from class lectures and from
discussion of class materials in study groups or in oral presentations, but chafe at written
assignments. Experiential learners—about 5% of the population—learn by doing and touching,
and clinical work, role-playing exercises, and moot court are their best instructional modalities.
Visual learners—the remaining 65% of the population—need to see what they are learning, and
while they have difficulty following oral lectures they perform well at written assignments and
readily recall material they have read.
The implications of variance in learning styles are particularly significant for legal
educators. Empirical research supports the conclusions that when students are matched with
teaching methods that complement their learning styles their absorption and retention is
significantly enhanced. However, law professors who rely upon the Socratic method or more
traditional lecturing techniques, as do the majority of those who teach doctrinal courses,
particularly in the first-year curriculum, may be satisfying the pedagogical needs of their verbal
learners without adequately engaging their kinesthetic or visual students, who comprise a
majority of their classes. Students for whom traditional teaching methods are unsatisfactory may
not only learn less but may suffer motivational problems and enjoy the law school experience
less than their peers.
Moreover, variations in learning styles have been linked to gender: women tend to be
more visually oriented than men, who are generally more kinesthetic, and consequently female
students are systematically more prone to suffer the deleterious effects of learning style-teaching
method mismatch than men. However, sixteen years after the American Bar Association
Commission on Women in the Profession suggested to law schools that “the first-year
curriculum would be improved by the use of greater variety of teaching methods in light of the
diversity of learning styles in the student body[,]” the typical first-year doctrinal course remains
a predominantly verbal domain. In some degree this is a function of the subject matter. After
all, law is a bibliocentric profession, and words are the coin of the realm. But we need not seek
the radical transformation of the law to teach to the entire class.
During my first week of the fall semester in late August 2002, while I was preparing to
teach Property for the first time, my wife, Amy, a professional artist, inquired as to the content of
the next day’s lesson, which centered upon one of the seminal cases in property and federal
Indian law, Johnson v. M’Intosh [23 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 542 (1823)]. After recounting for her the
chain-of-title problem and describing to her the herculean efforts of Chief Justice John Marshall
to rationalize the seizure of Indian land and prevent clouds from forming over all the land titles
granted by the United States while at the same time preventing the most normatively unattractive
extension of his holding in subsequent cases, Amy retired to her studio. An hour later she
returned with her interpretation of the case in the form of an original painting (see attached).
“Why don’t you show it to your class?” she urged me. The next day, I did.
At the beginning of class, I placed her painting on an easel at the front of the class and
advised students of an optional exercise: they could examine the painting, ponder it in relation to
the case and the other material we had covered thus far in the course, and write a short (no more
than two page) reaction paper. Of my 103 students, 46 wrote papers; of those 46, 37 were
female.
Reactions clustered around three principal themes. Nearly one-third of respondents
simply described correspondence between elements of the painting and themes from Johnson.
Another quarter attempted to identify and evaluate the moral judgment of the artist. The most
interesting papers, however, were drawn from the third group of respondents who took the
opportunity to express their own ethical, moral, and legal judgments.
Some sought to offer justification for Marshall’s opinion. “For the betterment of the
country, we had to do this,” said one student. Another commented that the painting was an
attempt to foist upon the class a “revisitionist treatment of history” that “ignore[d] the all-too-
prevalent stories of massacres perpetrated by Indians against unsuspecting settlers.”
Many more were dismayed to think that the pursuit of justice might not always be the
animating force behind judicial decisionmaking. “It makes me believe that . . . I might be in the
wrong profession if we are looking for peace in this life or the next,” one student wrote. “This
painting captures the fact that government gets to make up the rules as it goes along.” One
student suggested that the painting was an antidote to a false representation of history upon
which not only our legal system but our system of legal education rests: “The left side of the
painting illustrates a pleasant transfer of land titles, which is what students are taught in our
schools; the right side illustrates the true legal history of land acquisition and relations with
Indian peoples.”
Others were even more harsh: “The placement of Chief Justice Marshall in the center of
the painting is symbolic of the centrality of our legal system in terms of responsibility for
legitimizing genocide.” “It is really disgusting to read about how the Indians were treated by the
government since day one, but only when you create a visual representation of it does the full
horror become apparent.” “ “We wanted the land and were willing to acquire it—by any means
necessary.” “The painting illustrates better than words the clash between the politics and the law
of the country on the one hand and morality on the other.”
Still other commentators reported that the painting illustrated transformational potential
in the law. “Initially, I resented the law for its apparent outward lack of emotion . . . for those
that have suffered injustice. But . . . I now understand that even two hundred years ago there
were those that wished to break this cycle.” “This painting requires us to question why the law
is the way it is, why decisions are as they are, and how to change the law, or at least understand it
more.”
Finally, one student stated quite plainly that the painting “helped give me another cue to
remember the cases and another way to mentally represent what I learned.” Several students
were pleasantly surprised that there was a place for art anywhere in the legal academy.
Each week throughout the remainder of the semester I presented a series of other
paintings my wife executed to illustrate themes, doctrines, and cases, most notably State v.
Shack, 277 A.2d 369 (N.J. 1971), a famous case concerning access to private property, Boomer
v. Atlantic Cement Co, Inc, 309 N.Y.S.2d 312 (1970), a landmark nuisance case, and
Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty Five Twenty Five, Inc. (114 So. 2d 357 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1959), a decision affirming the absence of a right to sunlight in American jurisprudence. Student
responses matched the general pattern established in regard to Johnson. Each week, students
would eagerly await the next painting, and it was clear that the use of art to teach property was
enhancing student interest and participation in their legal education.
At the end of the semester I asked students to fill out a survey concerning their
experience with the reaction papers. Students were asked a single question—“Please indicate
your assessment of the degree to which the paintings, and the writing of the reaction papers in
response, aided in your learning the course material.”—and were instructed to select a number
from 1 to 5, where 1 indicated “useless,” 2 “not very helpful,” 3 “somewhat helpful”, 4 “very
helpful,” and 5 “indispensable.” The average student response was 4.2. Students were also
given the opportunity to make open-ended comments; one student indicated that “during the
exam I’ll have those pictures in my head, and it has made organizing the class so much more
effective!”
It is difficult to generalize from these informal findings. Not all students participated in
the exercise, and to be sure those who did are a self-selected group. It may well be that visual
learners, hungry for an opportunity to marry their learning style with their legal education, are
overrepresented in the sample. Art may not help all students learn the law, and evidence that my
wife’s work did so is still largely anecdotal. Moreover, it is difficult to replicate these findings.
Not every law professor will be so fortunate as to have a spouse who can paint and who is as
generous of his or her time as is mine! Still, other visual materials can be put to service to the
same end.
Finally, the purpose of using art to teach property was never to develop or test a theory
but rather to fulfil the obligation to teach to the entire class, a duty that requires us as legal
educators to stretch ourselves, and sometimes even our spouses’ canvases. I am grateful to Amy
for helping me to reach my visual learners, and grateful to my students for their interest and
involvement.
... An easy-to-use tool that addresses this limitation would encourage greater engagement and involvement in the Semantic Web community. Research literature has proven that visual graph creation tools cater to 65% of people who learn visually [2]; KGraphX fills this gap by offering a graph-based tool that allows naive and casual semantic users to create semantic models easily. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Tools for creating and managing knowledge graphs are a crucial ingredient of data management in various fields such as healthcare or manufacturing. Knowledge graphs comprise entities, attributes, and relationships, which help machines to understand the meaning of data and facilitate data sharing. Although knowledge graphs are a key concept for many applications, their creation remains complex and challenging, especially for novice users. To address this limitation, we have developed KGraphX, an easy-to-use visual editor to make knowledge graph creation for users with limited knowledge of Semantic Web technology more engaging. KGraphX uses visual elements, predictive typing, and augmented information from existing knowledge repositories to create knowledge graphs easily. In a task-based evaluation, we have proven the usability and quality of the created knowledge graphs using KGraphX. Compared to other tools, our tool significantly enhanced knowledge graph creation by 81%, while also improving its clarity by 91%.
... Such visuals may appeal to many, considering that roughly 65% of the population are visual learners. 35 Time is of the essence to get effective treatments to those in need; tools like SWIGs help hasten estimand discussions. Additionally, SWIGs can limit mistakes and misalignment between stakeholders as the graphs are succinct and clear. ...
Article
Confusion often arises when attempting to articulate target estimand(s) of a clinical trial in plain language. We aim to rectify this confusion by using a type of causal graph called the Single-World Intervention Graph (SWIG) to provide a visual representation of the estimand that can be effectively communicated to interdisciplinary stakeholders. These graphs not only display estimands, but also illustrate the assumptions under which a causal estimand is identifiable by presenting the graphical relationships between the treatment, intercurrent events, and clinical outcomes. To demonstrate its usefulness in pharmaceutical research, we present examples of SWIGs for various intercurrent event strategies specified in the ICH E9(R1) addendum, as well as an example from a real-world clinical trial for chronic pain. code to generate all the SWIGs shown is this paper is made available. We advocate clinical trialists adopt the use of SWIGs in their estimand discussions during the planning stages of their studies.
... By using a video instead of a traditional consent, the education caters to both visual and auditory learners [13]. With approximately 65% of adults identifying as visual learners, incorporating a visual component to consent creates a broader reach [14]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The challenges of consenting for procedures are well documented and are compounded when patients have limited English proficiency (LEP). Standardized video consent has been studied, but research in gastroenterology is limited. We created educational videos in English and Spanish covering the elements of traditional consent for colonoscopy and upper endoscopy. All participants underwent traditional verbal consent and a subset viewed the language and procedure specific video. Participants from a multilingual, safety-net hospital patient population were then given a questionnaire to assess their comprehension and satisfaction. Participants who watched the video had higher comprehension scores than those who received traditional verbal consent alone. This difference persisted when data was stratified by language and procedure, and when controlled for educational level and prior procedure. Video consent improves comprehension and satisfaction for endoscopy and may mitigate some of the challenges encountered when consenting patients with LEP.
... Since they allow a new way to approach information, network graphs can also be important tools for communicating results obtained from SNA, as they translate complex social dynamics into images that can catch the public's attention and can be intuitively read. Given the growing importance of visual learning (Bradford, 2004;Ma et al., 2012), especially with digital media and the internet, graphs can also be an effective way of communicating a research's results to lay audiences on online social network platforms. This has been increasingly the case of Journalism, which has been relying more on infographics to present complex and specialised information to the public (Zacks et al., 2002). ...
Article
Full-text available
Con sus orígenes en la Sociología, el análisis de redes sociales ha ganado popularidad con el desenvolvimiento de las Humanidades Digitales y de software gratuitos de visualización de redes, como Gephi. Para la Historia de las Ciencias, el análisis de redes puede destacar cómo el conocimiento científico es construido socialmente y depende de interacciones entre individuos e instituciones. En este artículo demuestro cómo el análisis y visualización de redes con Gephi puede ser una herramienta valiosa para comprender la sociabilidad de las expediciones científicas del siglo XIX al investigar los viajes de Louis Agassiz y Henry Walter Bates por Brasil.
... 300). Bradford (2011) notes that 65% of learners absorb information by seeing, 30% by hearing, and 5% by doing. If an instructor limits themself to lecture, only 30% of students will grasp the information they are communicating. ...
Article
Full-text available
Undergraduate creative writing courses are tasked with laying a foundation for students’ future writing. Plotting is a complex fiction-writing concept, complicated by writers’ and scholars’ conflicting views on the subject. For years, I have used author Angela Hunt’s (2013) Plot Skeleton to teach plotting. Though the activity is popular and enables students to implement plotting concepts in their stories, reflecting on the module revealed why the Plot Skeleton succeeds. It requires high expectations of students, addresses multiple ways of learning, gives ample opportunities for participation, is considered “fun” by students, facilitates group interaction, and employs a gradual release of responsibility teaching format.
... These causal graphs allow a quick view of the clinically relevant treatment effect. Such visuals may appeal to many, considering that roughly 65% of the population are visual learners [35]. Time is of the essence to get effective treatments to those in need; tools like SWIGs help hasten estimand discussions. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Confusion often arises when attempting to articulate target estimand(s) of a clinical trial in plain language. We aim to rectify this confusion by using a type of causal graph called the Single-World Intervention Graph (SWIG) to provide a visual representation of the estimand that can be effectively communicated to interdisciplinary stakeholders. These graphs not only display estimands, but also illustrate the assumptions under which a causal estimand is identifiable by presenting the graphical relationships between the treatment, intercurrent events, and clinical outcomes. To demonstrate its usefulness in pharmaceutical research, we present examples of SWIGs for various intercurrent event strategies specified in the ICH E9(R1) addendum, as well as an example from a real-world clinical trial for chronic pain. Latex code to generate all the SWIGs shown is this paper is made available. We advocate clinical trialists adopt the use of SWIGs in their estimand discussions during the planning stages of their studies.
... There are many reasons why graphical illustration represent an important source of ORB. The human brain is designed to rapidly process visual data and the majority of the population are visual learners [23,24]. Data visualization is more user-friendly, provides superior reader satisfaction compared to text and may be more effective in terms of imparting knowledge [25,26]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Outcome reporting bias (ORB) is widely reported in the medical literature, but the contribution from published graphical illustrations is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of ORB in contemporary nephrology clinical trials relating to the choice of outcomes reported through graphical illustrations. Methods An observational study was conducted using nephrology clinical trials searched from five high-impact medical journals from 2015-2020. Eligible trials reported a phase 2, 3 or 4 trial, contained at least one published outcome graphical illustration and were registered on a clinical trial registry. The primary outcome was the occurrence of ORB based on the choice of graphical illustrations in published trial manuscripts, deemed to be present if a graphical illustration displayed a secondary or unregistered outcome ahead of a trial's primary outcome, or if any unregistered trial outcome was presented as a graphical illustration. Results In 75 eligible clinical trials, the primary outcome for ORB was present in 60% of the trials (n = 45). Occurrence of the primary outcome did not differ significantly based on trial sample size, funding model, trial phase, individual medical journal or publication year. An unregistered trial outcome was graphically illustrated in 93% (n = 42) of those clinical trials with ORB present. Conclusion Outcome reporting bias based on the choice of graphical illustration is common, driven primarily by graphical illustration of unregistered trial outcomes. More appropriate choice of outcomes for graphical illustrations by authors, coupled with both increased enforcement of CONSORT guidelines by medical journals and specific guidelines for graphical illustrations choice, are desirable to address these findings.
Article
Full-text available
The study compared the reliability and validity of the Math Anxiety Scale (MAS) in different scale formats: 5-point scale, checklist, visual analog scale, and 4-point scale. Specifically, it sought to assess the student’s level of math anxiety, determine the reliability coefficients of each scale format, test the concurrent validity against the standardized scale, and compare the extracted factors with the original MAS. The respondents were 67 students, a total enumeration from two sections of a laboratory school in La Trinidad, Benguet. The standardized MAS (5-point scale) was adopted and transformed into a checklist, visual analog scale, and 4-point scale. The tests were administered at three-day intervals. The findings indicated that students experienced a moderate level of math anxiety, with cognitive dimension substantially contributing to their anxiety. The visual analog scale demonstrated the highest reliability coefficient, followed by the 4-point scale, checklist, and 5-point scale, respectively. Concurrent validity analysis revealed that the visual analog scale exhibited the highest concurrent validity, followed by the 4-point scale and checklist, respectively. Based on the results, the majority of the students are experiencing a moderate level of math anxiety. Among the four scale formats, the visual analog scale provides the most reliable and valid responses to be used in measuring math anxiety among junior high school students with ages ranging from 11 to 13 years old.
Chapter
The proposed contribution aims to describe an approach developed as part of doctoral research, the purpose of which is to identify methodologies and tools useful for the archiving, preservation, enhancement, and enjoyment of culture, through the design of digital platforms equipped with different investigation tools.The analysis of the scientific literature and the state of the art on the subject shows that there is a growing need for tools useful for the preservation and protection of memory and culture. To do this, digital design and visual communication have the role of conforming architectures and systems to enhance the archived heritage, with particular attention to different navigational models and to the principles of user interface. These aspects were investigated during the research course, through the study of methods of filing and presenting information, focusing also on the use of diagrammatic representation methods, which are increasingly being employed in digital collections, and participation at various levels and by various types of users, to consolidate the relationship between culture, digital memories, and community.KeywordsHybrid navigational modelsLogical-relational toolsDesign approaches for digital archive
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.