ArticlePDF Available

Effects of dynamic lighting on office workers: First results of a field study with monthly alternating settings

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Dynamic lighting is designed to have positive effects on well-being and performance. In a field experiment we tested whether these effects are detectable and stable over time when employed in actual work settings. The study consists of two tranches, one following a monthly alternating experimental design, the other a yearly alternating one. This paper reports on the first tranche. In a dual balanced design, office workers experienced dynamic or static lighting according to an a-b-a /b-a-b scheme over three consecutive periods (N = 142, 90, 83). Questionnaire data suggest no significant differences for need for recovery, vitality, alertness, headache and eyestrain, mental health, sleep quality, or subjective performance, although employees were more satisfied with the dynamic lighting. Implications and limitations of the study are discussed.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Effects of dynamic lighting on office workers:
First results of a field study with monthly
alternating settings
YAW de Kort PhD and KCHJ Smolders MSc
Human Technology Interaction Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven,
The Netherlands
Received 8 February 2010; Revised 12 June 2010; Accepted 20 June 2010
Dynamic lighting is designed to have positive effects on well-being and
performance. In a field experiment we tested whether these effects are detectable
and stable over time when employed in actual work settings. The study consists
of two tranches, one following a monthly alternating experimental design, the
other a yearly alternating one. This paper reports on the first tranche. In a dual
balanced design, office workers experienced dynamic or static lighting according
to an a-b-a /b-a-b scheme over three consecutive periods (N= 142, 90, 83).
Questionnaire data suggest no significant differences for need for recovery,
vitality, alertness, headache and eyestrain, mental health, sleep quality, or
subjective performance, although employees were more satisfied with the
dynamic lighting. Implications and limitations of the study are discussed.
1. Introduction
Although not always physically challenging,
office work does take its toll on one’s mental
resources. Stress and attention fatigue are
all too common in the office, so any environ-
mental or ambient feature that holds the
potential to revive office workers or help
them recuperate from stress or fatigue
throughout the day deserves our attention.
In the current study we explore lighting as a
potential environmental feature impacting
office workers’ well-being.
Recent research has indicated that lighting
may have an impact on biological and
psychological processes.
1–5
Dynamic lighting
is an innovative lighting solution that aims to
harness these potential effects of lighting
characteristics such as colour temperature
and illuminance. Artificial office lighting
typically is constant in both illuminance and
colour temperature, whereas natural light
varies throughout the day as a result of
weather conditions and the position of the
sun. Begemann et al.
6
showed that prefer-
ences for artificial lighting vary with weather
type, brightness and time of the day (in
addition, they reported substantial interper-
sonal differences). With dynamic lighting,
colour temperature and illuminance vary
during the day according to a preset protocol,
aiming to support or even enhance the
natural rhythm of employees’ alertness. A
potential protocol, also applied in the pre-
sent study, is presented in Figure 1. This
particular protocol does not exactly emulate
the natural pattern of daylight, but instead
offers a higher illuminance and colour
temperature in the morning and after lunch-
time with lower and warmer white light
during the late morning and afternoon. This
is in line with preferences reported for over-
cast days in winter
6
and thus aims to
Address for correspondence: Yvonne de Kort, Human
Technology Interaction, Eindhoven University of Technology,
5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
E-mail: y.a.w.d.kort@tue.nl
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
ßThe Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers 2010 10.1177/1477153510378150
stimulate workers during the work day, yet to
also facilitate desirable relaxation around the
lunch break.
Light can influence the regulation of the
biological clock, and the secretion of hor-
mones such as melatonin and cortisol. During
daytime the secretion of melatonin is low and
therefore the influence of light on its suppres-
sion minimal.
1
Research has shown that the
level of cortisol increases when exposed to
high light levels in the morning, but not in
the afternoon
1
or evening.
2
These biological
effects are dependent on the colour temper-
ature, light level, duration and timing of
exposure as well as on the size and position
of the light source
3,7,8
and probably have an
influence on individuals’ well-being, health
and performance.
9
Scheer and Buijs
2
showed
an increase in cortisol levels when participants
were exposed to 800 lx 1 hour after awaking,
compared to exposure to no light. However,
light level had no effect on cortisol levels in
the late evening. Ru
¨ger et al.
1
investigated the
effect of bright light on cortisol levels, core
body temperature, heart rate and sleepiness,
fatigue and energy. Participants were exposed
to a high light level (5000 lx) or a low light
level (510 lx) for 4 hours between noon and
4.00 pm in the first experiment and between
midnight and 4.00 am in the second experi-
ment. Participants were exposed to light levels
below 10 lx before and after the 4 hours of
light exposure. The results showed that light
level had an effect on heart rate and core body
temperature, but not on cortisol concentra-
tion. Light level also had a positive effect
on subjective alertness/sleepiness, feelings of
fatigue and energy: Participants felt more
Colour temperature (K)
5000
4000
3000
2000
8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00
Colour temperature (K)
Light level (lx)
Dynamic light scenario
750
650
550
Light level (lx)
450
Figure 1 The dynamic lighting scenario: Illuminance and correlated colour temperature of the lighting plotted against
time of day
346 YAW de Kort and KCHJ Smolders
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
alert, less fatigued and more energetic in the
bright light condition than in the dim light
condition. The results of these two experi-
ments show different patterns for the physi-
ological measures and the psychological
measures: Effects of lighting on physiological
measures were time dependent whereas effects
of lighting on psychological measures were
independent of time of day. Bright light only
increased heart rate and core body tempera-
ture during the nighttime exposure but not
during daytime exposure to the high light
level. The authors argue that the effect of
lighting on subjective alertness and sleepiness
is not fully mediated by the suppression of
melatonin as melatonin levels are very low
during daytime and suggest that there may be
different mechanisms behind the physiologi-
cal and psychological effects of lighting.
1
Phipps-Nelson et al.
10
investigated the
effect of a 5-hour light exposure to a high
light level (1000 lx at eye level) on sleepiness
and performance compared to less than 5 lx
during daytime under a constant routine after
two nights of sleep restriction. Results showed
that exposure to 1000 lx had a significant
effect on subjective sleepiness, performance
and slow eye movements, but not on melato-
nin level. Participants were more alert, that is
lower self-reported sleepiness and fewer short
eye movements, and shorter reaction times on
a vigilance test than in the 5 lx condition.
There was no effect of lighting condition on
melatonin level. In both conditions, melato-
nin levels were low as expected during
daytime.
Aries
11
reported an inverse correlation
between light level and employees’ level of
fatigue and sleep quality. In an earlier exper-
iment by Gru
¨nberger et al.,
12
participants were
exposed to either a high light level (2500 lx) or
a lower light level (500 lx) for 4 hours between
9.00 am and 5.00 pm. The results showed that
the higher light level had a positive effect on
participants’ alertness, their ability to concen-
trate and their mood, and resulted in a
reduction of errors made on a performance
test, compared to lower intensity lighting.
Other studies have also shown positive effects
of a high light level on people’s well-being and
performance.
1,13,14
It should be noted that in
most of these studies the difference in light
level between the high and low intensity
lighting condition was large (42000 lx).
Complementing studies employing artifi-
cial light, Kaida et al.
14
showed that indoor
exposure to natural light (42000 lx) for
30 minutes in the early afternoon had a
direct effect on subjective alertness and
EEG measures. No effect of light exposure
on cognitive performance was found. Kaida
et al.
15
also showed that 30 minutes exposure
to natural light through a window (42000 lx)
increased feelings of pleasure and reduced
feelings of sleepiness during the light
exposure.
Research into the psychological effects of
lighting suggests that both a high illuminance
and a high colour temperature can have
positive effects on people’s well-being, health
and performance. For instance, Fleischer
et al.
4
showed that exposure to higher
colour temperature lighting (5600 K) is more
stimulating than warm white lighting
(3000 K) although participants did indicate
that they experienced the warm white lighting
as more pleasant. Some smaller studies have
also shown an activating effect of a higher
colour temperature (6500–7500 K) compared
to 3000 K lighting.
5,16
However, other studies
have failed to demonstrate comparable
effects
17,18
so, overall, the literature is still
inconclusive. Employing even more extreme
lighting conditions, Viola et al.
19
found an
effect of high colour temperature (17 000 K)
on workers’ ability to concentrate, level of
fatigue, alertness, daytime sleepiness and
subjective performance compared to a lower
colour temperature (2900 K). Lastly, Mills
et al.
20
found comparable effects of colour
temperature on well-being and performance
of employees in a call centre.
Effects of dynamic lighting on office workers 347
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
Practically all of the rigorous scientific
research into the biological and psychologi-
cal effects of high intensity or high colour
temperature office lighting has been per-
formed in laboratories, where participants
are exposed to – sometimes extreme – lighting
conditions for only short periods of time –
typically several hours. Moreover, other var-
iables potentially impacting the effects of light
are under the experimenters’ control in con-
trast to the situation in real-world research.
Studies into the effects of dynamic lighting
are scarce both in the field and in the lab and
often involve only small numbers of partici-
pants. One example of a more rigorous design
is the recent study by Hoffmann et al.
21
They
compared the effects of variable lighting
(500–1800 lx, 6500 K) to those of static light-
ing (500 lx, 4000 K) on melatonin levels and
subjective mood on three consecutive days.
The variable lighting pattern, consisting of
relatively short peaks in lighting level in the
morning and early afternoon, showed modest
positive effects on self-reported activity, while
under static lighting, subjective ratings of
deactivation and fatigue increased in the
afternoon. Unfortunately, the findings did
not point in the same direction unequivocally
and although sulphatoxymelatonin levels
decreased during the day, this pattern did
not differ between static and dynamic light. It
appears that melatonin levels were already
low in the early morning and quickly
decreased to their natural daytime mini-
mum.
22,23
User evaluations in real-world
projects have produced some anecdotal evi-
dence for increased well-being and perfor-
mance amongst office employees (e.g.
Interpolis and Trigion in The Netherlands,
VUB bank in Slovakia). Whether these effects
are detectable and whether they are stable
over time when actually employed in the work
setting has not been thoroughly investigated
to date.
The present paper reports the intermediate
results of the first large-scale field test into the
effects of dynamic lighting on office workers.
The longitudinal study follows an experimen-
tal design in two tranches, in which four
groups of about 100 to 200 employees each
are alternately exposed to dynamic and static
lighting. In one tranche, which we are report-
ing on here, lighting conditions change on a
monthly basis during the winter months,
according to a dual balanced design. In the
second tranche the lighting conditions remain
stable during winter, dynamic for one group,
static for the other. Then during summer both
groups switch to the alternate condition. The
advantage of this design is that we can both
explore the relatively short- and long-term
effects of dynamic lighting compared to
constant lighting. In addition, we can com-
pare the two lighting conditions both between
and within groups. In this paper, we describe
the results of data gathered during the first
winter for the two short-term groups (see
Smolders and de Kort
24
for preliminary
results of the second tranche).
2. Method
2.1 Design
The current study is a dual-balanced field
experiment, with Lighting condition (dynamic
vs. static) within, and Group (A vs. B)
between groups, and three consecutive mea-
surement periods (dynamic–static–dynamic
and static–dynamic–static schemes respec-
tively, in January, February and March). In
the original design there were four measure-
ment periods and the lighting condition
would change three times. However, the
study was delayed because complaints just
before the start indicated that the calibration
in some of the rooms was incorrect due to
newly added furniture replacement (desks and
tables with a white finish). All luminaires were
checked and recalibrated where necessary.
Therefore, it was not possible to have four
measurement periods during the dark
months. In the current dual balanced design
348 YAW de Kort and KCHJ Smolders
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
two groups of participants were exposed to
dynamic or static lighting, alternating on a 3-
week basis, for three periods in a row.
2.2 Participants
The Westraven building houses a sub-
stantial part of Rijkswaterstaat, which is
the implementing body of the Ministry of
Transport, Public Works and Water
Management. Some 2000 people work in the
Westraven building. For the current monthly
alternating tranche, only departments located
in the high-rise part of the building were
selected. Departments with field-work
employees were excluded from the study.
Additional selection criteria for departments
were that groups with similar tasks could be
assigned to both experimental groups and
that both experimental groups would approx-
imately be of the same size. Scenarios were
implemented on complete floors. Layout and
furniture on each of the floors in the building
were very similar, apart from the colour of the
carpeting. Departments were distributed such
that each colour of carpet was equally repre-
sented in both groups. Tasks of the recruited
departments included administration, control,
call-centre, ICT and purchasing. As stated
above, each task was equally represented in
each of the two groups. In total, the groups
consisted of 414 office employees from seven
departments. All members of the selected
departments were recruited. Post hoc exclu-
sion criteria were part-time contracts of less
than 4 days, field jobs or substantial external
services, reported illness during the measure-
ment period, and filling in the questionnaire
at home instead of in the office.
a
Participants were aware that they were
participating in a survey related to the effects
of lighting, but were unaware of the exact
lighting scenarios. The cover story was that
various dynamic scenarios would be tested
throughout the study, but the participants did
not know we were testing static versus
dynamic light.
b
Employees worked on their own floors, but
they may have occasionally briefly visited other
floors. For lunch most employees would go
down to the lunch restaurant; some may have
gone for a brief walk outside occasionally. Of
the participants in the first sample, 19.7%
reported experiencing dry eyes to a moderate
(12.7%) or severe (7%) extent, 16.9% experi-
enced moderate to severe eye fatigue and 4.9%
experienced moderate blurry vision.
In the first month of the field study 147
questionnaires were completed and returned
(response rate: 35.5%). The data of five
participants were removed because they indi-
cated that they were only rarely at their
workplace in the high-rise office building, that
they were ill during the measurement period, or
that they filled out the questionnaire at home.
Of the remaining 142 participants (83 in the
static and 59 in the dynamic condition), 111
were male and 31 female with a mean age of
45 years (standard deviation (SD): 10.23,
range: 23–65 years). In the second measure-
ment period, the questionnaire was again
distributed and 96 employees (43 in the
static and 47 in the dynamic condition) filled
out the questionnaire completely (response
rate: 23.2%). The data of six participants
were removed because they indicated that
they were only rarely at their workplace in the
office or that they had filled out the ques-
tionnaire at home. Of the remaining 90
participants, 67 were male and 23 female
with a mean age of 48 years (SD 9.73, range:
25–63 years). In the third measurement
period, 84 employees (42 in the static and 41
in the dynamic condition) completed the
a
Filling out the questionnaire at home was used as an exclusion
criterion because of concern that conditions in the home office
would confound the effects of office conditions.
b
During the last month in the second year, we probed people’s
suspicion of the exact scenario on their floor (data not reported
in this manuscript). The data indicated that most could not
recognise the applied scenario and no differences emerged
between the two conditions.
Effects of dynamic lighting on office workers 349
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
questionnaire (response rate: 20.3%). One
participant filled out the questionnaire at
home and his data was removed from the
dataset. Of the remaining 83 participants, 68
were male and 15 female with a mean age 48
years (SD: 9.45, range: 25–65 years).
2.3 Procedure
The general procedure was such that
employees experienced a certain lighting
condition for 3 weeks. Data collection took
place in the third week, after they had worked
under these conditions for at least 2 weeks. The
study formally started on Thursday, January
8. From that time on the lighting condition
was dynamic for half of the participants
(group A) and static for the others (group B).
Two weeks later (again on Thursday) all
potential participants received an e-mail with
a hyperlink to an online questionnaire. The
scenarios during this third week remained as
they had been the 2 weeks before. A reminder
was sent the following Tuesday. Data collec-
tion stopped 1 week after it had started; this
was also the day that the conditions switched
between groups. On Thursday January 29,
the lighting condition was switched from
dynamic to static and vice versa. Again,
questionnaires were distributed 2 weeks after
the new light scenarios had started (February
12). On February 19, the lighting condition
was again switched, back to the same lighting
conditions as in January. Data collection of
this third phase started 2 weeks later (March 5)
and ended on March 12. During the second
and third measurement periods, the same
procedure as in January was used. The selected
timeline avoided national and popular
holidays as well as the switch to daylight
saving time (summertime, March 29). It took
about 15 minutes to fill in the questionnaire.
A Living Colors lamp from Philips was
raffled every measurement period as an incen-
tive for participants to complete the
questionnaire.
2.4 Setting and lighting manipulation
The study was performed in a recently
renovated high-rise office building, with a
large daylight contribution (Figure 2), in
which a flex-working concept is applied. The
flex-working concept means that employees
do not have their own desk but are free to
select any desk on their department’s floor
throughout the day, week and year. All floors
consist of a mix of meeting rooms, concen-
tration cells and open-office space to facilitate
the various tasks people perform throughout
the day. The departments that were selected
for the study were all in the high-rise part of
the building, on various floors, with alternat-
ing conditions.
Recessed dynamic lighting luminaires
(TBS375) were used, each holding 2 TL5
fluorescent lamps (light code 827 (2700K) and
865 (6500K)). The luminaire offers the possi-
bility to change the colour temperature of the
light between warm white (approximately
3000 K) and cool white (approximately
5000 K). After installation, every luminaire
was calibrated in order to achieve the correct
light levels on the desk below (measured
horizontally). A central lighting control
module controlled both the light level and
the colour temperature according to the
programmed scenario.
In the dynamic lighting condition, employ-
ees experienced a gradually changing lighting
scenario (500–700 lx; 3000–4700 K) with a
higher light level and colour temperature in
the morning and after lunchtime (Figure 1).
The static condition provided an illuminance
of 500 lx at a colour temperature of 3000 K.
As complete floors of the building were
used as the test site, light levels may have
differed moderately between specific desks
and locations on account of the non-perfect
uniformity of the artificial lighting, and due
to the varying daylight contribution over
the department floors. Vertical illumination
levels were not measured or calibrated but
probably differed substantially, depending on
350 YAW de Kort and KCHJ Smolders
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
the specific location and viewing direction of
the individual.
For both the static and the dynamic
scenario daylight responsive dimming was
implemented. Sensors mounted near the lumi-
naires close to the windows measured the light
levels on the desks underneath. Whenever
levels exceeded the target value (e.g. 500 lx for
the static or 700 lx for the dynamic scenario)
on account of the daylight contribution, the
system would dim down to a 0 lx artificial
lighting contribution. Estimates of the day-
light factor with a simulation of a floor in
Dialux produced an average daylight factor
of 4.88 on the desks of the employees (day-
light factors on individual desks ranged from
2.74 to 6.88). Of course, the measurements
were performed in the darker months of the
year (January–March). Investigation of the
weather in the first, second and third mea-
surement period – weekdays of the 2 weeks
before and 1 week during the survey – showed
that during January there were more sun
hours than in February and March (approx-
imately 60, 35 and 40 hours, respectively).
25
2.5 Measures
The questionnaire consisted of measures of
the need for recovery (i.e. the need to recu-
perate from attention fatigue and stress),
vitality, alertness, headache and eyestrain,
mental health, sleep quality and subjective
performance. Subjective evaluations of light-
ing conditions were also assessed. In addi-
tion, attitudes towards the job and work
environment and personal characteristics
were included as control variables. Objective
measures such as days of sick leave and coffee
consumption were collected on a department
level to corroborate subjective findings.
2.5.1 Need for recovery
Need for recovery was measured with a
behaviour-based scale consisting of 34
c
items
describing behaviours at office employees’
discretion to recover from mental strain,
psychological distress, motivational deficits
Figure 2 A view of the indoor environment
c
The original scale consists of 35 items. The item ‘I take care of
plants in the office’ was dropped due to lack of variance as it
was not allowed to have plants in this office.
Effects of dynamic lighting on office workers 351
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
and/or mental fatigue,
26
combined with 11
evaluative statements created by Van
Veldhoven and Broersen.
27
Examples of such
restorative behaviours are ‘I go to the toilet
even though I do not need to’, ‘I go home
earlier than planned’, ‘I take an extra, short
break’, ‘I look outside for a moment’.
d
This
scale has been tested for reliability, convergent
and predictive validity in earlier research.
26
Some of these items had 5-point response
scales ranging from (1) ‘never’ to (5) ‘very
often’ or from (1) ‘never’ to (5) ‘at least once a
day’. Other items had dichotomous response
scales with either (1) ‘It happens never or
rarely’ and (2) ‘It happens sometimes or often’
as response options, or with (1) ‘yes’ and (2)
‘no’ options. The evaluative statements are
dichotomous items with (1) ‘yes’ and (2) ‘no’ as
response options. Separation reliability of the
scale was 0.83 in each consecutive month. The
separation reliability matches a classical defi-
nition of reliability; it represents the ratio
between the true and estimated variance of
people’s recovery needs.
28
The reliability score
of this scale thus indicates that scale’s internal
consistency is satisfactory.
2.5.2 Mental health and vitality
Mental health and vitality were assessed
using two subscales from the Dutch version of
the SF-36 Health Survey (RAND-36).
29
The
mental health subscale consists of five items,
such as ‘Have you been a very nervous
person?’ and had an internal consistency
between ¼0.75 and ¼0.81. The vitality
subscale consists of four items (e.g. ‘Did you
have a lot of energy?’) with Cronbach’s alpha
between ¼0.76 and ¼0.87. The response
options of both subscales ranged from (1)
never to (5) very often.
2.5.3 Headache and eyestrain
Headache and eyestrain were measured
with eight items taken from Viola et al.,
19
which describe symptoms, such as ‘headache’
and ‘eye fatigue’, with response options rang-
ing from (1) ‘absent’ to (4) ‘severe’. The scale
had an internal reliability ranging from
¼0.84 to ¼0.89.
2.5.4 Alertness and sleep quality
Alertness was assessed with the
Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)
30
with
‘today’ instead of ‘at this moment’ as a time
frame. The response options ranged from (1)
‘extremely alert’ to (9) ‘extremely sleepy–fight-
ing sleep’. Sleep quality was measured with the
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
31
consisting of
18 items concerning subjective sleep quality,
sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency,
sleep disturbances, sleeping medication and
daytime dysfunction. The scale has an internal
consistency between ¼0.61 and ¼0.70.
2.5.5 Subjective performance
Subjective performance was measured with
the question ‘On a scale from 0 to 10, how
would you rate your performance on the
days you worked during the last 2 weeks?’
derived from the World Health Organization
Health and Work Performance Questionnaire
(WHO-HPQ).
32
2.5.6 Subjective evaluations
Subjective evaluations of lighting conditions
concern pleasantness of the lighting, experi-
enced light level, experienced disturbances of
the artificial lighting and of daylight and
satisfaction with the lighting. Pleasantness of
the lighting was measured with two semantic
differential adjective items (pleasant–unpleas-
ant, comfortable–uncomfortable). These items
were internally consistent with Cronbach’s
alpha ranging from ¼0.79 to ¼0.90.
Experienced light level was measured with
three items about light level (artificial light
d
The reference 26 is in Dutch, but the scale and a report on the
validity and reliability in English are available upon request
from the authors. A manuscript has been submitted to the
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
(JOOP).
352 YAW de Kort and KCHJ Smolders
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
and daylight) on the workplace, on the screen
and in the office space from Hellinga and de
Bruin-Hordijk.
33
The response scale ranged
from (1) ‘too little light’ to (5) ‘too much light’
and the scale was internally consistent with
alphas ranging from ¼0.72 to ¼0.84.
Experienced disturbance of the artificial light-
ing was assessed with two items adopted from
Hellinga and de Bruin-Hordijk.
33
The two
items probed hindrance from direct light and
from reflections (glare) of artificial light. The 5-
point response scale ranged from (1) ‘never’ to
(5) ‘very often’ and these items had an internal
consistency ranging from ¼0.75 to ¼0.91.
Experienced disturbance of daylight was mea-
sured with similar items. This scale was inter-
nally consistent with alpha ranging from
¼0.69 to ¼0.77. Satisfaction with the
lighting was assessed with the question: ‘How
satisfied are you with the lighting at your
workplace?’ with response options ranging
from (1) ‘very dissatisfied’ to (5) ‘very satisfied’.
2.5.7 Job and work-related evaluations
Job-related questions concern evaluation of
the work atmosphere, job satisfaction, commit-
ment to the company, work diversity, decision
authority and job demands. To assess work
atmosphere, four evaluative statements were
employed, such as ‘The work atmosphere is
good.’ The response scale was a 5-point scale
from (1) ‘never’ to (5) ‘very often’. The internal
consistency of the four statements ranged from
¼0.81 to ¼0.83. Three dichotomous (yes/
no) statements were employed to assess job
satisfaction (‘I am satisfied with my job’),
commitment to the company (‘I feel committed
to the company’) and work diversity (‘my work
is diverse’), respectively. Decision authority and
job demands were measured with two subscales
of the Job Content Questionnaire.
34
Decision
authority was assessed with three statements,
such as ‘I have freedomto make decisionsabout
my job’. The subscale is internally consistent
with alpha ranging from ¼0.64 to ¼0.69.
Job demands were measured with four
statements, such as ‘My job requires I work
fast’. This subscale had an internal consistency
between ¼0.68 and ¼0.76. Both subscales
had a 4-point response scale ranging from
(1) ‘totally disagree’ to (4) ‘totally agree’.
Work-condition-related questions con-
cerned the impression of the office environ-
ment, pleasantness of the indoor climate
and satisfaction with the indoor climate.
Impression of the office environment was
assessed with nine adjectives, such as ‘pleas-
ant‘, ‘orderly’ and ‘quiet’ from Aries.
11
The
unipolar response options ranged from (1)
‘not at all to’ (5) ‘extremely’. The internal
consistency of the nine adjectives ranged from
¼0.78 to ¼0.91. Pleasantness of the indoor
climate was measured with two semantic
differential adjective items (pleasant–unpleas-
ant, comfortable–uncomfortable). This scale
was internally consistent with alpha values
ranging from ¼0.84 to ¼0.92. To assess
satisfaction with the indoor climate two items
concerning satisfaction with the temperature
and ventilation at the workplace were
employed with response options ranging
from (1) ‘very dissatisfied’ to (5) ‘very satis-
fied’. This scale was internally consistent with
alpha between ¼0.73 and ¼0.77.
2.5.8 Personal characteristics
Questions regarding personal characteris-
tics concerned gender, age, light sensitivity
and mean number of working hours per week.
Light sensitivity was measured with the items
‘How much trouble do your eyes give you
when you are exposed to bright light?’ and
‘How much do you suffer from headaches
when you are exposed to bright light?’ on a
5-point scale from (1) ‘not at all’ to (5)
‘extremely’. The reliability of this scale ranged
from ¼0.73 to ¼0.78.
2.6 Analyses and hypotheses testing
The aim of the study was to test whether
the dynamic lighting scenario installed in
this building would show positive effects on
Effects of dynamic lighting on office workers 353
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
well-being and performance. The main
hypotheses therefore were that in dynamic
conditions, employees would report higher
vitality and alertness, and lower need for
recovery than under static lighting conditions.
In addition, effects on subjective perfor-
mance, mental health, sleep quality and
headache and eyestrain were explored.
Moreover, potential mediation and/or mod-
eration by individuals’ light sensitivity,
impression of the office and work atmosphere
were investigated.
e
Linear mixed model
(LMM) analyses were employed to enable
the inclusion of covariates in a repeated
measures design. Moreover, this analysis
enabled us to deal with the fact that some
employees would participate three times,
whereas others filled in the questionnaire
only once or twice.
3. Results
To investigate the effect of lighting condition
(dynamic vs. static lighting) on employees’
well-being, health and performance, LMM
analyses were performed on the need for
recovery, vitality, mental health, alertness,
headache and eyestrain, sleep quality and
subjective performance (separate LMM anal-
yses for each dependent variable), with
Lighting condition and Month as fixed fac-
tors and participant as a random factor. Light
sensitivity, impression of the office and work
atmosphere were included as covariates.
f
Means and standard deviations for the
dependent variables are reported in Table 1,
per experimental condition and per month, as
are descriptive statistics for the most relevant
background variables. These data were then
analysed as specified above. The results
showed that there was no significant effect of
lighting condition on need for recovery, vital-
ity, mental health, alertness, headache and
eyestrain, global sleep quality and subjective
performance (all F51, except for alertness,
F¼1.31, NS). In Table 2, the F-statistics for
Condition and Month are shown. Table 3
shows the estimated marginal means for all
dependent variables in both the static and the
dynamic condition.
The factor Month did show an effect on
need for recovery [F(2,153) ¼13.27; p50.001].
Pairwise comparisons indicated that workers’
Table 1 Main dependent variables and background measures: Means and (standard deviations) per experimental
condition and phase
Phase Condition January February March
Static Dynamic Static Dynamic Static Dynamic
N 835943474241
Need for recovery 0.97 (0.71) 0.92 (0.81) 0.59 (0.67) 0.69 (0.75) 0.88 (0.81) 0.68 (0.70)
Vitality 14.4 (2.6) 14.4 (2.4) 14.2 (2.6) 14.3 (2.6) 14.8 (2.2) 14.2 (3.4)
Alertness (KSS) 3.40 (1.36) 3.76 (1.75) 3.70 (1.83) 3.70 (1.55) 3.71 (1.37) 3.71 (1.68)
Mental health 20.7 (2.4) 20.5 (2.1) 20.0 (2.6) 20.4 (2.7) 20.9 (1.6) 20.9 (2.4)
Headache and eyestrain 12.3 (3.8) 12.1 (3.7) 12.4 (2.6) 12.8 (4.0) 12.1 (4.1) 12.0 (4.4)
Sleep quality 4.68 (2.22) 4.84 (2.26) 5.20 (2.06) 5.34 (2.95) 4.19 (2.18) 4.69 (2.49)
Subjective performance 7.59 (0.74) 7.43 (0.84) 7.44 (0.73) 7.43 (0.74) 7.45 (0.63) 7.44 (0.92)
Age 44.3 (10.7) 48.0 (9.1) 50.4 (8.8) 46.5 (10.3) 47.1 (9.7) 49.1 (9.2)
Light sensitivity 2.02 (0.79) 2.01 (0.87) 2.07 (0.91) 2.18 (0.99) 2.01 (0.97) 1.91 (0.79)
Work atmosphere 4.01 (0.60) 3.92 (0.66) 3.97 (0.63) 4.03 (0.60) 4.08 (0.51) 4.01 (0.73)
e
For the sake of clarity and brevity, we will only report on
background variables in as far as they showed significant
differences or relations.
f
We first assessed the Pearson’s correlations between poten-
tially confounding variables and dependent variables and
added only those covariates that had significant correlations
with the dependent measures for well-being, health and
performance.
354 YAW de Kort and KCHJ Smolders
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
recovery needs were lower in January
(mean (M): 0.95; SD: 0.77) than in February
(M:0.64; SD: 0.71) and March (M:0.78; SD:
0 .76) with p50.01 for both contrasts. There was
no difference in recovery needs between
February and March (p¼0.16). The effects of
Month on the remaining dependent variables
did not reach statistical significance. To get an
impression of effect sizes, partial correlations
were computed between Lighting condition and
the dependent variables, and Month and the
dependent variables, respectively (correlations
were controlled for Month and the dependent
variables, respectively; in addition, the correla-
tions are controlled for the covariates: Light
sensitivity, impression of the office and work
atmosphere). The only correlation that was
significant was between Month and the need
for recovery (r¼0.134, p¼0.02).
We also performed LMM analyses with
scales probing the subjective evaluation of the
lighting as dependent variable, Lighting con-
dition and Month as fixed factors, participant
number as random factor, and light sensitiv-
ity, impression of the office environment and
work atmosphere as covariates. The results
of these analyses showed that Lighting con-
dition had a statistically significant effect on
satisfaction with the lighting [F(1, 211) ¼5.16;
p¼0.02]. Office workers were more satisfied
with the lighting in the dynamic lighting
condition (M: 3.69; SD: 0.87) than in the
static condition (M: 3.53; SD:0.91).Inaddi-
tion, Lighting condition had a significant
effect on the experienced disturbances of
artificial lighting [F(1,196) ¼4.44; p50.04].
Unexpectedly, workers reported fewer distur-
bances of artificial lighting in the static
condition (M: 1.71; SD: 0.72) than in the
dynamic lighting condition (M: 1.80; SD:
0.78). Note that disturbances were measured
on a 5-point scale, thus office employees in
both conditions, on average, never (1) or
rarely (2) experienced disturbances of the
artificial lighting. There was no significant
effect of Lighting condition on experienced
disturbances of daylight [F51, p¼0.34]. In
addition, the Lighting condition had no
significant effect on the evaluation of pleas-
antness of the lighting [F(1, 242) ¼1.87;
p¼0.17]. The effect of Lighting condition
on experienced light level showed a non-
significant trend [F(1, 247) ¼3.01; p¼0.08]:
indicating a trend for employees to evaluate
the lighting as brighter in the dynamic light-
ing condition (M: 3.06; SD: 0.48) than in the
static condition (M: 2.98; SD: 0.52). Table 4
reports the F-statistics for Lighting condition
and Month concerning the subjective evalua-
tion of the lighting; Table 5 reports the
estimated marginal means on all subscales
for both experimental conditions.
Month had a significant effect on distur-
bances of daylight [F(2, 192) ¼4.98; p¼0.01].
Pairwise comparisons indicated that workers
Table 2 Results of LMM analyses: F-statistics for well-
being, health and performance measures (N¼315)
Lighting condition Month
Fdf pFdf p
Need for
recovery
0.06 (1,167) 0.81 13.27 (2,153) 50.001
Vitality 0.08 (1,190) 0.78 0.34 (2,169) 0.71
Mental health 0.01 (1,179) 0.92 2.56 (2,154) 0.08
Headache and
eyestrain
0.00 (1,193) 0.95 0.45 (2,172) 0.64
Alertness 1.31 (1,202) 0.25 1.01 (2,180) 0.37
Sleep quality 0.63 (1,151) 0.43 2.81 (2,135) 0.06
Subjective
performance
0.35 (1,210) 0.56 1.19 (2,190) 0.31
Table 3 Estimated marginal means (EMM) and standard
errors (SE) of well-being, health and performance mea-
sures for static and dynamic conditions (N¼315)
Dynamic Static
EMM SE EMM SE
Need for recovery 0.76 0.05 0.77 0.05
Vitality 3.59 0.04 3.58 0.04
Mental health 4.10 0.03 4.10 0.03
Headache and eyestrain 1.53 0.03 1.53 0.03
Alertness 3.74 0.12 3.59 0.11
Sleep quality 4.98 0.18 4.84 0.17
Subjective performance 7.42 0.06 7.46 0.06
Effects of dynamic lighting on office workers 355
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
experienced more disturbances of daylight in
January (M: 2.69; SD: 0.91) than in February
(M: 2.54; SD: 0.91) and March (M: 2.52; SD:
0.82) with p¼0.022 and p¼0.004, respec-
tively. There was no significant difference
between February and March concerning
disturbances of daylight (p¼0.55).
4. Discussion
We employed a three-phase dual-balanced
ABA/BAB experimental design to investigate
the effect of dynamic lighting compared to
static lighting on workers’ well-being, health
and subjective performance in a longitudinal
field study. In this paper, the results of linear
mixed model analyses on the data of the
short-term groups are reported (first tranche).
The results showed no significant differences
in workers’ need for recovery, vitality, sleep
quality, mental health, headache and eye-
strain, or subjective performance as a result of
the dynamic versus the static lighting condi-
tion, controlled for relevant personal, job and
work-related characteristics.
Interestingly, in spite of us not finding the
beneficial effects that were hypothesised,
workers in the dynamic lighting condition
did report being more satisfied with that
lighting condition, although at the same time
they reported being disturbed by direct light
or reflections of the lighting more often than
did workers in the static lighting condition.
Need for recovery showed a significant
effect of month of measurement, with
employees reporting a lower need in January
than in February and March. A lower need
for recovery indicates a lesser degree of
attention fatigue and stress. This is in line
with weather reports, indicating more hours
of sun on the workdays during the measure-
ment period in January than in February and
March, but may also be related to the fact
that most employees had taken time off in
December on account of the holidays. The
higher number of disturbances of daylight in
January may also be explained by the fact
that there were more hours of sun in the first
measurement period than in the other two.
The question we now need to address is
what conclusions could or should be drawn
from these data. For this we must consider not
only the data, but also the methodology. We
had hoped to conduct the study in four
consecutive months, running four full-month
measuring periods. Yet instead we saw our-
selves compelled to cut one period and shorten
the remaining periods from 4 to 3 weeks. This,
unfortunately, is the reality of doing field
studies. However, considering the fact that in
the questionnaires participants were always
asked to reflect on the last 2 weeks, the
Table 5 Estimated marginal means (EMM) and standard
errors (SE) of the subjective evaluations of static and
dynamic lighting conditions (N¼315)
Dynamic Static
EMM SE EMM SE
Pleasantness
of lighting
3.66 0.06 3.55 0.06
Satisfaction
with lighting
3.73 0.07 3.57 0.06
Light level 3.06 0.04 2.97 0.04
Disturbance
of daylight
2.64 0.07 2.56 0.07
Disturbance
of lighting
1.82 0.06 1.69 0.06
Table 4 Results of LMM analyses: F-statistics of subjec-
tive evaluation of the lighting condition (N¼315)
Lighting condition Month
Fdf pFdf p
Pleasantness
of lighting
1.87 (1,242) 0.17 1.09 (2,220) 0.34
Satisfaction
with lighting
5.16 (1,211) 0.02 0.21 (2,192) 0.81
Light level 3.01 (1,247) 0.08 2.28 (2,223) 0.11
Disturbances
of daylight
0.93 (1,215) 0.34 4.98 (2,192) 0.01
Disturbances
of lighting
4.44 (1,196) 0.04 1.31 (2,178) 0.27
356 YAW de Kort and KCHJ Smolders
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
procedure still worked well in the three-times-
3-week period compromise that resulted.
Moreover, we did manage to uphold a sound
experimental design. The dual-balanced ABA/
BAB design is a statistically efficient design: It
exploits the fact that in each time period we
have both treatments and effects are tested
within groups, as both groups experienced
both lighting conditions. Furthermore, we
employed a range of measurements, none of
which showed significant beneficial effects of
dynamic lighting. Power analyses indicated
that participant numbers were such that min-
imal detectable differences of, for instance,
vitality and need for recovery were around 0.3
and 0.4 units, respectively, in the single
between-groups test alone. Sensitivity for the
repeated and within-groups comparison was
even higher. All scales repeatedly showed good
reliability and had been successfully used in
earlier studies and, although response rates
were only modest, participant samples were
still large enough to enable testing of these
effects. Yet in spite of the robust design,
methodology and procedure, we were not able
to establish beneficial effects of dynamic
lighting when compared to static lighting.
One possible reason why we did not find the
expected effects was the substantial daylight
contribution in the renovated building used in
our study. Dynamic lighting is said to be most
effective in situations with a low daylight
contribution,
35
yet the building in our study
has large daylight openings and appears very
light. A high proportion of daylight could
potentially have undermined the differences
between the static and dynamic lighting cycle,
especially in combination with the daylight
responsive dimming. On the other hand, the
study was performed during the darker
months of the year (January–March).
Nevertheless, on very sunny days the light
level on desks close to the windows may have
occasionally risen above the targeted level.
Since in those instances, the artificial light was
dimmed until only the daylight contribution
remained, on very sunny days this may have
resulted in similar light levels for people near
the windows, whether they were working on
floors with the static or the dynamic scenario.
A second consideration is that the specific
dynamic pattern of the lighting employed here
may have attenuated the findings. As was
stated in the introduction, very little research
exists on psychological effects of dynamic
lighting. The pattern employed in the current
study dictates fairly subtle changes in illumi-
nance and colour temperature, especially in
comparison to changes outdoors or the
manipulations applied in laboratory-based
studies.
1,12–15,19–21
These design choices have
been based on state-of-the-art insights into
human alertness curves, yet we are still far
from fully understanding light’s effects on
humans’ psychological and physiological
states. Moreover, they were dictated by the
maximum capacity of the installed lighting
system and requirements for energy effi-
ciency. The exact maximum of colour tem-
perature and intensity of the lighting, the
exact timing and shape of the curve and the
range of wavelengths for an optimal curve are
still under investigation. From the current
findings one would certainly recommend
more extreme values in terms of light intensity
values higher than 2000 lx or even 2500 lx
have been shown to successfully influence
psychological variables
1,12–15
– or colour
temperature values over 5600 K or even
6000 K have shown similar effects.
4,5,16
From
the present study we conclude that the light
levels employed in the dynamic scenario were
too low to induce benefits on relevant psy-
chological variables such as need for recovery,
vitality and subjective alertness that are mea-
surable in real-world conditions.
We conclude that in the first tranche of
this longitudinal research we have not been able
to establish beneficial effects of dynamic light-
ing on individuals’ need for recovery, vitality,
sleep quality, mental health, headache and
eyestrain, or subjective performance, although
Effects of dynamic lighting on office workers 357
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
office workers did report higher satisfaction
with the dynamic than the static lighting. In
the second tranche of the current project we will
explore such long-term effects in groups that
experienced static versus dynamic lighting
during two consecutive years (AB/BA design).
In addition, we will replicate the study per-
formed in this first tranche. Additional
measures will be included to investigate poten-
tial effects of views to the outside and to explore
interpersonal differences, for example, related
to chronotype. As yet, it remains unclear
whether beneficial effects of dynamic lighting
may emerge in more long-term applications,
in environments with very limited or no
daylight contribution, or when more pro-
nounced or differently shaped curves are
applied in terms of intensity and/or colour
temperature.
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to Rijkswaterstaat, the
Rijksgebouwendienst, Philips and Ariadne
Tenner for facilitating and supporting this
project. We would also like to thank
Martine Knoop for her comments on an
earlier version of this paper. Lastly, we would
like to thank the two anonymous reviewers
for their thoughtful and constructive
feedback.
References
1Ru
¨ger M, Gordijn MCM, Beersma DGM,
de Vries B, Daan S. Time-of-day-dependent
effects of bright light exposure on human
psychophysiology: Comparison of daytime,
night time exposure. American Journal of
Physiology – Regulatory, Integrative and
Comparative Physiology 2006; 290(5): 1413–420.
2 Scheer FA, Buijs RM. Light affects morning
salivary cortisol in humans. Journal of Clinical
Endocrinical Metabolism 1999; 84(9):
3395–3398.
3 Morita T, Tokura H. The influence of different
wavelengths of light on human biological
rhythms. Applied Human Science 1998; 17:
91–96.
4 Fleischer S, Krueger H, Schierz C. Effect of
brightness distribution and light colours on
office staff, results of the ‘Lighting harmony’
project: Proceedings of Lux Europa 2001,
Reykjavik, Iceland, 2001.
5 Musea H, Sato M. The effect of color tem-
perature of lighting sources on the autonomic
nervous functions. The Annals of Physiological
Anthropology 1992; 11: 533–538.
6 Begemann SHA, van den Beld GJ, Tenner AD.
Daylight, artificial light and people in an office
environment, overview of visual and biological
responses. International Journal of Industrial
Ergonomics 1997; 20: 231–239.
7 van Bommel WJM. Non-visual biological
effect of lighting and the practical meaning for
lighting for work. Applied Ergonomics 2006;
37(4): 461–466.
8 Rea MS, Figueiro MG, Bullough JD.
Circadian photobiology: An emerging frame-
work for lighting practice and research.
Lighting Research and Technology 2002; 34(3):
177–190.
9 van Bommel WJM, van den Beld GJ. Lighting
for work: A review of visual and biological
effects. Lighting Research and Technology
2004; 36(4): 255–269.
10 Phipps-Nelson J, Redman JR, Dijk D-J,
Rajaratman SMW. Daytime exposure to
bright light, as compared to dim light,
decreases sleepiness and improves psychomo-
tor vigilance performance. Sleep 2003; 26(6):
695–700.
11 Aries MBC. Human lighting demands, healthy
lighting in an office environment. PhD thesis.
Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of
Technology, 2005.
12 Gru
¨nberger J, Linzmayer L, Dietzel M,
Saletu B. The effect of biologically-active
light on the noo- and thymopsyche and on
psychophysiological variables in healthy
volunteers. International Journal of
Psychophysiology 1993; 15(1): 27–37.
13 Badia P, Myers B, Boecker M, Culpepper J.
Bright light effects on body temperature,
358 YAW de Kort and KCHJ Smolders
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
alertness, EEG and behavior. Physiology and
Behavior 1991; 50(3): 582–588.
14 Kaida K, Takahashi M, Otsuka Y. A short
nap and natural bright light exposure improve
positive mood status. Industrial Health 2007;
45(2): 301–308.
15 Kaida K, Takahashi M, Haratani T, Otsuka
Y, Fukasawa K, Nakata A. Indoor exposure
to natural bright light prevents afternoon
sleepiness. Sleep 2006; 29(4): 462–469.
16 Deguchi T, Sato M. The effect of color
temperature of lighting sources on mental
activity level. The Annals of Physiological
Anthropology 1992; 11: 37–43.
17 McColl SL, Veitch JA. Full-spectrum lighting:
A review of its effects on physiology and
health. Psychological Medicine 2001; 31:
949–964.
18 Veitch JA, McColl SL. A critical examination
of perceptual and cognitive effects attributed
to full-spectrum fluorescent lighting.
Ergonomics 2001; 44: 255–279.
19 Viola AU, James LM, Schlangen LJM, Dijk
D-J. Blue-enriched white light in the workplace
improves self-reported alertness, performance
and sleep quality. Scandinavian Journal of
Work, Environment and Health 2008; 34(4):
297–306.
20 Mills PM, Tomkins SC, Schlangen LJM. The
effect of high correlated colour temperature
office lighting on employee wellbeing and work
performance. Journal of Circadian Rhythms
2007; 5(2): 2–10.
21 Hoffmann G, Gufler V, Griesmacher A,
Bartenbach C, Canazei M, Staggl S,
Schobersberger W. Effects of variable lighting
intensities and colour temperatures on sul-
phoatoxymelatonin and subjective mood in an
experimental office workplace. Applied
Ergonomics 2008; 39: 719–728.
22 Cajochen C, Kra
¨uchi K, Wirz-Justice A.
Role of melatonin in the regulation of
human circadian rhythms and sleep.
Journal of Neuroendocrinology 2003; 15:
432–437.
23 Zee PC, Turek FW. Role of melatonin in the
regulation of sleep. In: Turek FW, Zee PC.
(eds), Regulation of Sleep and Circadian
Rhythms. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1999:
181–196.
24 Smolders KCHJ, de Kort YAW. Light up my
day: A between-group test of dynamic lighting
effects on office workers’ wellbeing in the field:
Proceedings of Lux Europa, Istanbul, Turkey,
2009.
25 Klimatologie – Maand en Seizoensoverzichten.
Retrieved 27 April 2009 from http://
www.knmi.nl/klimatologie/maand_en_
seizoensoverzichten/index.html.
26 Smolders KCHJ, de Kort YAW, Kaiser FG.
Behoefte aan restoratie in kantoren : de
ontwikkeling en validatie van een gedragsgeba-
seerde schaal om de psychologische effecten van
(dynamische) verlichting te meten [Need for
Recovery in Offices: Development and valida-
tion of a behavior-based scale to measure
psychological effects of lighting]. MSc thesis.
Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit
Eindhoven, 2008. Retrieved 17 June 2010,
from http://alexandria.tue.nl/extra2/afstversl/
tm/Smolders%202008.pdf.
27 Van Veldhoven M, Broersen S. Measurement
quality and validity of the ‘‘Need for
Recovery’’ scale. Occupational Environmental
Medicine 2003; 60(suppl 1): 3–9.
28 Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch
Model: Fundamental Measurement in the
Human Science. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2001.
29 Van der Zee KI, Sanderman R. Het meten van
de algemene gezondheidstoestand met de
RAND-36, een handleiding. Groningen:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 1993.
30 A
˚kerstedt T, Gillberg M. Subjective and
objective sleepiness in the active individual.
International Journal of Neuroscience 1990;
52(1): 29–37.
31 Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman
SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality
Index: A new instrument for psychiatric prac-
tice and research. Psychiatry Research 1989;
28(2): 193–213.
32 Kessler RC, Barber C, Beck A, Berglund P,
Cleary PD, McKenas D, Pronk N, Simon G,
Stang P, Ustun TB, Wang P. The World
Health Organization Health and Work
Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). Journal of
Occupational Environmental Medicine 2003;
45(2): 156–174.
33 Hellinga HIJ, de Bruin-Hordijk GJ. The
influence of daylight and view out on the visual
Effects of dynamic lighting on office workers 359
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
comfort of workplaces: Proceedings of
Balkanlight, Ljubljana, 2008: 233–242.
34 Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N,
Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The Job
Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument
for internationally comparative assessments of
psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of
Occupational Health Psychology 1998; 3(4):
322–355.
35 Schriek MHJ. Dynamic lighting – energy
savings by use of atypical daylight respon-
sive lighting control. MSc thesis.
Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of
Technology, 2007.
360 YAW de Kort and KCHJ Smolders
Lighting Res. Technol. 2010; 42: 345–360
... Koppel and Tint (2013) reported moderate improvements in wellbeing, perceived productivity, and work performance on a computerized reaction speed test for participants working in offices outfitting dynamic lighting. However, in another study (de Kort and Smolders 2010), no significant impacts of dynamic lighting on subjective performance, sleep quality, mental health, vitality, alertness, need for recovery, and headache and eyestrain were observed, although office workers were more satisfied with dynamic lighting conditions compared to static lighting conditions. Overall, the key outputs regarding the implementation of daylight and dynamic lighting in workplaces are as follows: ...
... c lighting conditionKoppel and Tint (2013) Dynamic lighting . After working in offices outfitting dynamic lighting, workers reported improved well-being and productivity. Participants of the treatment group with dynamic lighting reported a significant decrease in self-reported health and environmental complaints during and after the intervention.deKort and Smolders (2010) Dynamic lighting . Although office workers were more satisfied with dynamic lighting compared to static lighting condition, there was no significant effect of lighting conditions across all measures, including subjective performance, sleep quality, mental health, vitality, alertness, need for recovery, and headache and eyestrain. ...
... The states of subjective emotion, alertness and sleep were significant to officers. 19 The scales of three questionnaires which included Brunel Mood Scale (BRUMS), 25 Subjective Alertness Scale (SAS) 26 and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) 27 were used to assess the degree of the psychological states in the experiment. The psychological indicators include anger, confusion, depression, fatigue, tension, vigour, SAS and KSS. ...
... time natural light, 19 respectively, can promote a significant psycho-physiological calming effect (lower heart rate). Gubin et al. 36 carried out an experiment on the impact of endogenous and exogenous factors on the expression of daily rhythms, including body temperature and blood pressure. ...
Article
Full-text available
Most people today stay in a constant artificial lighting environment for a long time. Lack of sufficient daylight exposure may lead to circadian, sleep or mental problem. Dynamic lighting is an effective countermeasure in consideration of its dynamicity. However, besides its changeability, whether the daylight simultaneousness of dynamic lighting has a beneficial effect is unclear. A lab-based study was carried out to explore the effect of Daylight-Simulcasted Dynamic Lighting (DSDL), which simulates the simultaneous information of daylight conveyed by its variation. A reversed pattern of DSDL (Re-DSDL) was also introduced as one of the test conditions for comparison. The within-subject experiment was performed by 24 participants in four conditions: two dynamic lighting patterns (DSDL and Re-DSDL) in two periods (dawn and dusk). The dependent variables were psychological states, physiological indicators and cognitive performance. The results showed that DSDL brought greater benefit to the psychological state than Re-DSDL in general. During dawn, participants experienced less anger and depression in DSDL than in Re-DSDL; during dusk, participants experienced less anger and vigour in DSDL than in Re-DSDL. DSDL also had a significant effect on some of the physical indicators compared with Re-DSDL, but no effect on cognitive performance.
... A light environment for each activity improves work motivation, productivity, and accuracy [4][5][6], increasing learning efficiency, memory, and concentration [7][8][9]. On the other hand, an unsuitable lighting environment can negatively affect occupants, such as causing drowsiness or impeding learning [3,10]. In general, illuminance, which indicates the amount of light, and CCT (Correlated Color Temperature), which is an evaluation factor of light color, were considered when we arrange indoor lighting environments [11]. ...
... The amount and quality of light in individual workspaces is determined in part by the amount and quality of light available from natural and artificial sources through walls, translucent surfaces, and reflections on polished and light-colored materials. Psychologically, high illuminance and a high color temperature affect employees' wellbeing positively, as suggested by De Kort & Smolders (2010). Some studies also indicated that physical and psychological wellbeing can be developed through adequate light levels and the quality of light (Lamb & Kwok, 2016;Thayer et al., 2010;Veitch et al., 2008;Viola et al., 2008), but not alertness (van Duijnhoven et al., 2018); further, more daylight was seen to enhance sleep quality (Bjornstad et al., 2016a;Boubekri et al., 2014;Sithravel & Ibrahim, 2021). ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
This paper offers a systematic review of the literature on workplace wellbeing and interior design, exploring the creation and evaluation of appealing environments that enhance employee wellbeing. This paper adopts a systematic approach to review using the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Multiple databases were searched. The final review included 55 studies out of 472 that examined factors related to workplace wellbeing. The findings of this study suggest that background noise and open-plan workspaces negatively affect workplace wellbeing, while visual connections with plants and natural objects enhance it. This paper extends the current literature in two ways. Firstly, by highlighting key factors that impact workplace wellbeing. Secondly, it divides factors that contribute to workplace wellbeing into three categories: positives, negatives, and moderate impact factors. Design professionals and workplace managers can utilize this information to identify features that contribute most to the overall work environment.
... Research has shown that optimal lighting can enhance sleep, alertness, and concentration, thereby improving productivity [10][11][12][13]. Furthermore, lighting is linked to psychological well-being and can profoundly affect both physical and mental health [14][15][16]. Window views also play a crucial role in the satisfaction of office occupants. For instance, a survey of 2500 office workers in the UK revealed that 89% considered an outside view essential [6]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Modern lifestyles result in people spending 90% of their time indoors, where windows serve as a unique component providing an outdoor view and enabling visual experiences. Chromogenic windows, which adjust both thermal and visual conditions, represent a promising fenestration system for achieving energy savings. However, the tinting properties and their effects on human responses to filtered window views have not been thoroughly explored. This study conducted an experimental test using a customised questionnaire to investigate eight distinct window conditions in a hotel building. Forty-five participants took part in this evaluation by observing photographs. The conclusions drawn are as follows: (1) All tinted windows were found to be less acceptable than clear windows; however, the bronze window was relatively preferred. (2) In terms of visual capacity, the red window had the most negative effect, followed by the blue window. (3) Considering the window views, the tinted windows significantly disturbed the view outside. These results have the potential to guide the development of chromogenic windows in practical applications in the future, particularly from the perspective of colour selection.
... Also, children in the classroom became important sources of sense and latent heat that must be dealt with in the summer and could contribute to reducing energy use in the winter (Yael Valerie Perez & Isaac Guedi Capeluto, 2009). Several studies (Heschong, 2002;Kort & Smolders, 2010;Seyedehzahra Mirrahimi et al., 2013) have shown that the appropriate temperature, lighting, humidity, and room air quality help people learn. ...
Article
Full-text available
Nanomaterial technology involves the fabrication and manipulation of materials at the nanoscale, which can result in novel properties and applications. Aerogel is a nanomaterial that has remarkable properties such as high thermal resistance and optical clarity. These features make it a suitable material for glazing windows in school buildings located in hot and arid regions, where daylighting and thermal performance are important design criteria. This study aims to evaluate the performance of aerogel-glazed windows in classrooms with different orientations and compare them with conventional windows. The study uses Design-Builder software to simulate the daylighting and thermal performance of the classrooms with aerogel-glazed windows in different orientations. The findings show that aerogel glazing on the northern and southern façades reduces heat gain from windows by 7.46 and 26.88%, respectively. East and west orientations should be avoided due to extreme solar heat gain through exterior windows. Investigated glazing systems meet the LEED V4 spatial daytime autonomy (sDA) standards for regularly occupied floor areas, with an acceptable sDA of ≥ 55% for all building orientations. The northern façade exhibited the most favorable results, preserving nearly 69.52% of spatial daylight autonomy and an average daylight factor of 2.65%. The northern orientation also had the highest useful daylight illuminance of 89.6%. Aerogel glazing is an effective building insulation technology that balances classroom window-specific heat gain with daylight in hot dry locations.
... Adequate lighting is an important and essential factor in visual work [5]. Lighting affects the physiological and biological processes in the body [6] .Hence, it has become the subject of many studies in the world [2]. Light wavelength and intensity, or exposure duration, can lead to changes in the endocrine and physiological processes of the body [7]. ...
... [7] Apart from the visual effects of light, its positive biological effects such as feeling healthy, alert, as well as having a pleasant mood, have been studied for 25 years in the field of medical and biological science. [7] De Kort and Smolders [8] and Scheer and Buijs [9] reported the effect of lighting on psychological-biological processes and demonstrated that participants exposed to abundant light were more alert and energetic than those exposed to lower illuminance levels. The results of one study revealed that error rate, reaction time, and the inability to think increased due to extreme mental fatigue, inadequate lighting, and low sleep quality. ...
Article
Full-text available
Aim The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of different levels of lighting on the attention index of males and females under thermal comfort. Materials and Methods To measure the effect of different lighting levels (200, 500, and 1500 lux) on attention index, Toulouse-Piéron Test was conducted in a chamber under thermal comfort condition (22°C, 45% RH). This study was conducted on 33 healthy students (17 males/16 females) with a mean (±standard deviation) age of 22.1 ± 2.3 years. The exposure time was 1.5 h. Results The results indicated that the reduction in lighting level (200 lux) significantly decreased the attention index, speed, and accuracy of performance for both groups; however, this descending trend for the male participants was slightly higher than the female ones ( P < 0.05). On the other hand, by increasing the lighting level (500 and 1500 lux), the attention index of the individuals was significantly improved under distracting and busy working environment ( P < 0.05). Conclusion The results of the present study demonstrated that the female participants showed better performance and lower mistakes in accuracy-demanded tasks. It was also found that, compared to the female participants, the attention level of the male participants was more easily affected. Furthermore, by increasing the lighting level, the distraction level among the female participants was lower than that of the males, and their ability to do dual tasks was significantly enhanced.
Chapter
Full-text available
This article deals with tracking a reference spectrum, enhancing the circadian entrainment of the occupants. The choice of the reference spectrum was made with an emphasis on maintaining the CCT, maintaining a CRI value of at least 80 for the general work area, and maintaining the luminous flux. Use of the Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) algorithm results in the optimal number of LEDs needed for spectrum synthesis. As a result, this work intends to offer a solution for making a luminaire. The percentage error in CCT for the simulated spectrums was less than 0.4%. The daylight spectrum is also selected as a reference spectrum so that close characteristics of sunlight are reached, meeting human comfort needs while also delivering the advantages of sunlight. This novel method of keeping a reference spectrum to design a LED luminaire for circadian entrainment with high luminous efficacy leads to the human-centric lighting system.
Article
Full-text available
Study Objectives The present study examined the effects of indoor exposure to natural bright light on afternoon sleepiness. Design Participants took part in 3 experimental conditions: (1) a natural bright light condition in which they carried out performance and arousal tests sitting near a window (3260.0 ± 1812.43 lux) from 12:40 PM to 1:10 PM, (2) a nap condition in which they were provided a nap opportunity for 20 minutes from 12:45 PM, and (3) a control condition in which they performed the tests in less than 100 lux surroundings from 12:40 PM to 1:10 PM. Before and after each treatment, the same series of tests were administered. Setting A temperature- and light-controlled sleep laboratory. Participants Sixteen healthy female paid volunteers aged 33 to 43 (38.1 ± 2.68) years. Interventions Indoor natural bright light and a short nap. Measurements and Results Arousal levels were measured by the Psychomotor Vigilance Task, Alpha Attenuation Test, Karolinska Drowsiness Test, and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. The tests were repeated every 30 minutes from 11:00 AM to 4:10 PM. Ambient light intensity was maintained at less than 100 lux, except during natural bright light exposure. Short-term exposure to natural bright light significantly improved afternoon arousal levels, as measured by the Karolinska Drowsiness Test and Alpha Attenuation Test, the effects of which continued for at least 60 minutes (1:10–2:10 PM). However, no significant differences were observed between conditions for Psychomotor Vigilance Test performance. Conclusions Brief indoor exposure to natural bright light may decrease afternoon sleepiness. This technique of light could be used in work settings in which napping is not permitted. Citation Kaida K; Takahashi M; Haratani T et al. Indoor exposure to natural bright light prevents afternoon sleepiness.
Article
Full-text available
With the detection in 2002 of a novel photoreceptor cell in the eye, the biological effects that light has can be better understood. From the research on the biological effects of lighting, it is evident that the rules governing the design of good and healthy lighting installations are, to a certain degree, different from the conventionally held rules. We demonstrate that it can be beneficial to be able to adapt both the level and the colour of the lighting. Not only the light on the visual task, but also that entering the eye determines the overall quality of lighting. In a working environment, not only are the advantages in terms of health and wellbeing important for the workers themselves, they also lead to better work performance, fewer errors, better safety, and lower absenteeism.
Book
Written in an accessible style, this book facilitates a deep understanding of the Rasch model. Authors Bond and Fox review the crucial properties of the Rasch model and demonstrate its use with a wide range of examples including the measurement of educational achievement, human development, attitudes, and medical rehabilitation. A glossary and numerous illustrations further aid the reader's understanding. The authors demonstrate how to apply Rasch analysis and prepare readers to perform their own analyses and interpret the results. Updated throughout, highlights of the Second Edition include: a new CD that features an introductory version of the latest Winsteps program and the data files for the book's examples, preprogrammed to run using Winsteps;, a new chapter on invariance that highlights the parallels between physical and human science measurement;, a new appendix on analyzing data to help those new to Rasch analysis;, more explanation of the key concepts and item characteristic curves;, a new empirical example with data sets demonstrates the many facets of the Rasch model and other new examples; and an increased focus on issues related to unidimensionality, multidimensionality, and the Rasch factor analysis of residuals. Applying the Rasch Model is intended for researchers and practitioners in psychology, especially developmental psychologists, education, health care, medical rehabilitation, business, government, and those interested in measuring attitude, ability, and/or performance. The book is an excellent text for use in courses on advanced research methods, measurement, or quantitative analysis. Significant knowledge of statistics is not required. © 2007 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. All rights reserved.
Article
Synopsis Until now the chief obstacle to the application of the maximum likelihood method of estimation to factor analysis has been the lack of any really good numerical method of solution. In this paper we give a brief review of recent work which remedies this defect. Two factor analysis models are considered. In each case we derive results which are of use in connection with new methods of solution. Formulae are given for the large-sample variances and covariances of the estimates of parameters in the first model.
Article
This study examined the effects of bright light exposure, as compared to dim light, on daytime subjective sleepiness, incidences of slow eye movements (SEMs), and psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) performance following 2 nights of sleep restriction. The study had a mixed factorial design with 2 independent variables: light condition (bright light, 1,000 lux; dim light, < 5 lux) and time of day. The dependent variables were subjective sleepiness, PVT performance, incidences of SEMs, and salivary melatonin levels. Sleep research laboratory at Monash University. Sixteen healthy adults (10 women and 6 men) aged 18 to 35 years (mean age 25 years, 3 months). Following 2 nights of sleep restriction (5 hours each night), participants were exposed to modified constant routine conditions. Eight participants were exposed to bright light from noon until 5:00 pm. Outside the bright light exposure period (9:00 am to noon, 5:00 pm to 9:00 pm) light levels were maintained at less than 5 lux. A second group of 8 participants served as controls for the bright light exposure and were exposed to dim light throughout the entire protocol. Bright light exposure reduced subjective sleepiness, decreased SEMs, and improved PVT performance compared to dim light. Bright lights had no effect on salivary melatonin. A significant positive correlation between PVT reaction times and subjective sleepiness was observed for both groups. Changes in SEMs did not correlate significantly with either subjective sleepiness or PVT performance. Daytime bright light exposure can reduce the impact of sleep loss on sleepiness levels and performance, as compared to dim light. These effects appear to be mediated by mechanisms that are separate from melatonin suppression. The results may assist in the development of treatments for daytime sleepiness.
Article
The problem of the statistical significance of factor loadings is attacked, using the ‘jack-knife’. The technique, while not new, has curiously not been applied to factor analysis. The procedure is outlined and applied to two classes of data: (1) real data from which a clear pattern of significant factor loadings emerges, and (2) random data which do not fare well under ‘jack-knifing’.