Perceptions of organ donation after circulatory determination of death among critical care physicians and nurses: A national survey

Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Critical care medicine (Impact Factor: 6.31). 06/2012; 40(9):2595-600. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182590098
Source: PubMed


We sought to identify factors related to critical care physicians' and nurses' willingness to help manage potential donors after circulatory determination of death, and to elicit opinions on the presence of role conflict in donors after circulatory determination of death and its impact on end-of-life care.
Randomized trial administered by Web or post of four donors after circulatory determination of death vignettes. Response rates were 31.0% and 44.3%, respectively.
Two thousand two hundred and six academic inten-sive care unit physicians and 988 intensive care unit nurses in the United States.
Majorities of intensive care unit physicians (72.5%; 95% confidence interval 69.2-75.9) and nurses (74.3%; 95% confidence interval 70.2-78.5) believed they should help manage potential donors after circulatory determination of death. 14.7% (95% confidence interval 12.0-17.4) of physicians and 14.3% (95% confidence interval 11.0-17.6) of nurses believed that management of donors after circulatory determination of death would create professional role conflicts. 33.8% (95% confidence interval 30.0-37.4) of physicians and 55.1% (95% confidence interval 50.3-59.7) of nurses believed that preserving opportunities for donors after circulatory determination of death could improve end-of-life care. More favorable views of donors after circulatory determination of death were provided by clinicians randomly assigned to vignettes depicting donors with previously denoted preferences for organ donation; similar effects were not introduced by vignettes in which surrogates actively initiated donation discussions.
These findings suggest that critical care physicians and nurses are generally supportive of managing donors after circulatory determination of death, particularly when patients were registered organ donors. However, minorities of clinicians harbor concerns regarding conflicts of interest, and many are uncertain of the practice's impact on end-of-life care.

24 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Organ transplantation is the only treatment option for many patients with end-organ failure. Due to lack of transplantable organs, patients already on the waiting list die every day. The number of organ donors in Germany fell in 2012 by 12.8 %, reaching its lowest level since 2002. The medical and nursing personnel in intensive care units have a key role in the recruitment of potential organ donors; therefore, a survey was conducted on this subject. Materials and methods At the 12th Congress of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive and Emergency Medicine (DIVI) in December 2012, a point prevalence study using a paper–pencil survey was performed. Results A total of 1045 questionnaires were analyzed. Of respondents, 81 % favor organ donation in the event of their own brain death. The approval rate in the medical profession was 84 % and 75 % of the nursing profession. Only 45.3 % of the participants (47 % physicians, nursing 44 %) had an organ donor card and nearly half (45 %) had already confided their opinion towards organ donation to their family or friends. The main reasons for a lack of acceptance of organ donation was the concept of brain death (40 %), fear of abuse by organ trade (29 %), and the lack of integrity of the body after death (11 %). The particularly intense discussion about organ donation and transplantation in 2012 resulted in a predominantly negative change of attitude in 45 % of respondents. Conclusion The vast majority of the intensive care personnel supports organ donation, but less than half of the respondents have an organ donor card. The reports of irregularities in the organ allocation were scrutinized, but had apparently no significant impact on the individual and collective fundamental donor decision.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2013 · Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hart et al (7) should be commended for performing this survey of clinicians' perceptions of DCDD. For this intensiv-ist, the survey raises concerns about the process of DCDD, informed consent, and the COI involved. The next questions to ask should aim to determine clinicians' knowledge of the controversies involved, and their informed opinions regarding these controversies.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2012 · Critical care medicine
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Circulatory-respiratory or brain tests are widely accepted for definition and determination of death, but have several controversial issues. Both determinations have been stimulated by organ donation, but must be valid independently of this process. Current controversies in brain death include whether the definition is conceptually coherent, whether the whole-brain or brainstem criterion is correct, whether one neurological examination or two should be required, and when to conduct the examination following therapeutic hypothermia. Controversies about the circulatory determination of death include the minimum duration of asystole that is sufficient for death to be declared, and whether the distinction between permanent and irreversible cessation of circulatory functioning is important. In addition, the goal of organ donation raises issues such as the optimal way to time and conduct the request conversation with family members of the patient, and whether the Dead Donor Rule should be abandoned.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2013 · Nature Reviews Neurology
Show more