This work investigates about the occupational integration of the Argentine population, taking as reference two features of relevance, such as: the occupational category and the branches of the occupied. Traditionally the occupational structure is usually analyzed by the results in their levels more aggregated Total (National, Provincial, etc.). Because of this, will be incorporated into a more
... [Show full abstract] geographic dimension that takes into account the variable size of the agglomeration, which will be operationalized by using categories urban, previously defined in function of different levels of population density, which will occur new results related to patterns of labor insertion of the population, from the fragmentation between different urban categories in each of the regions (that we consider as intraregional variation).
The assumptions that guide this article, asserts that the intraregional variations - which arise from the segmentation of each region according to their categories urban-, with respect to the variables occupational category and branch of activity, are superior to the existing differences at the interregional level. In case of being able to corroborate this statement, we will be in a position to consider the urban hierarchies as a factor of influence on the occupational integration, superior to that exercised by the regional contexts (with respect to the occupational variables mentioned above).