The health of a force is crucial to its Military readiness. Decreasing military budgets, global economic stagnation, and increasing medical healthcare cost threaten the sustainability of Military healthcare systems. Furthermore, these conditions risk both the individual’s as well as the organization’s collective health status significantly. Therefore, current healthcare systems must adapt.
Over the past four decades, there has been a grassroots utilization of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) by societies. Dissatisfaction with current systems and medication side effects, as well as preferences for “natural treatments” and modalities that align with personal beliefs and values are reasons why patients are seeking CAM. Military personnel are utilizing CAM at the same or higher rate than their civilian counterparts. Prayer/faith, herbals and supplements, acupuncture, and meditation are some of the
more frequently used modalities.
The objective of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)’s Human Factors and Medicine Panel
Research Task Group 195 (RTG HFM-195) was to identify and evaluate the various countries’ data on the utilization (rationale, frequency, accessibility) of CAM among Military personnel, learn about the acceptability of CAM by the leadership of Military organizations, and review briefly the current regulatory and legal status of CAM utilization and its implementation. This RTG was set up as an exploratory committee in a first step for further RTGs, conferences, and symposia that could focus on NATO-wide implementation of selected CAM modalities (e.g., acupuncture, meditation/mindfulness programs, movement/yoga), with ongoing analysis of efficacy, cost-effectiveness, suitability, and acceptability. Furthermore,
acceptable terminology, regulatory policies, and educational literature need to be developed. Cross-cultural initiatives and research projects are paramount to expanding perspectives and understanding. This could ultimately improve healthcare systems and increase available treatment options for patients.
The highlights of the RTG findings are published in this report. Historical and cultural perspectives of several medical systems are briefly reviewed to understand “what’s old may be new again”. Healthcare was evaluated from the point of view of individual treatment modalities (acupuncture / Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA), meditation/mindfulness, biofeedback, spirituality, etc.), whole medical healthcare systems (Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ayurveda, Tibetan medicine), and new proposed paradigms (Integrative
Health and Healing (IH2), systems biologic approach, trauma spectrum disorder). Available studies on current CAM utilization and treatment programs are also presented.
The overall recommendation of the RTG was to have continued review and evaluation of Integrative Health and Healing with specific attention to implementation of selected practices; education of patients, providers, and policy-makers; analysis of clinical outcomes and best practices; and establishment of collaborative research endeavours focused on cost-effectiveness, new paradigms, and models of care.