Nipple/Breast Stimulation and Sexual Arousal in Young Men and Women

Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States
Journal of Sexual Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.15). 04/2006; 3(3):450 - 454. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00230.x
Source: PubMed


Introduction. The role of nipple/breast stimulation in influencing sexual arousal in men and women during lovemaking has only been the subject of opinion-based comment rather than evidence-based study. No attempt to question people about such sexual behavior has ever been undertaken.
Aim. The study was designed to ascertain the effects of nipple/breast manipulation in young men and women on their sexual arousal.
Methods. A short questionnaire about nipple/breast stimulation during sexual activity was administered to 301 (148 men; 153 women) sexually experienced undergraduates (age range 17–29 years, 95% between 18 and 22).
Main Outcome Measures. Replies to questions in questionnaire.
Results. The major findings in regard to the women were that 81.5% reported that stimulation of their nipples/breasts caused or enhanced their sexual arousal, 78.2% agreed that when sexually aroused such manipulation increased their arousal, 59.1% had asked to have their nipples stimulated during lovemaking, and only 7.2% found that the manipulation decreased their arousal. In regard to the men, 51.7% reported that nipple stimulation caused or enhanced their sexual arousal, 39% agreed that when sexually aroused such manipulation increased their arousal, only 17.1% had asked to have their nipples stimulated, and only 7.5% found that such stimulation decreased their arousal.
Conclusion. Manipulation of the nipples/breasts causes or enhances sexual arousal in approximately 82% of young women and 52% of young men with only 7–8% reporting that it decreased their arousal. Levin R, and Meston C. Nipple/breast stimulation and sexual arousal in young men and women. J Sex Med 2006;3:450–454.

Download full-text


Available from: Roy Levin
  • Source
    • "The most thorough investigation of erogenous experience is that of Kinsey, Pomeroy, and Martin (1953a) and Kinsey, Pomeroy, Martin, and Gebhard (1953b), which contains 521 possible interview questions, but did not request systematic erogenous ratings of individual body parts e (see also Albright, 2006; Scherer Brewer, 1985). There have been other opportunities for systematic survey of erogenous zones (Levin & Meston, 2006; Masters & Johnson, 1966; Schofield, 1967), but no scientific study appears to have collected the appropriate data. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Erogenous zones have paradoxical response properties, producing erotic feelings from body surfaces distant from the genitalia. Ramachandran has suggested an intriguing neuroscientific explanation for the distribution of erogenous zones, based on the arrangement of body parts (such as the adjacent positioning of the genitals and the feet) in primary somatosensory cortex (S1). The present study represents the first systematic survey of the magnitude of erotic sensations from various body parts, as well as the first empirical investigation of the S1 theory of erogenous zones, by analysis of whether evaluations of erogenous magnitude from adjacent S1 sites tend to correlate. A sample of some 800 participants, primarily from the British Isles and Sub-Saharan Africa, completed a survey of 41 body parts, each rated for erogenous intensity. Ratings for the feet were surprisingly low. However, there were remarkable levels of correlation between ratings of intensity, regardless of the age, sexual orientation, nationality, race and, more surprisingly, the sex of our participant sample (R(2) values ranging between .90 and .98). Multiple regression and factor analysis investigated whether body parts nearby in S1 were significantly correlated. The S1 hypothesis appears to lack support, because of the low level of foot ratings, the lack of inter-correlation between ratings for nearby S1 sites, and the previous literature suggesting that cortical stimulation of S1 does not appear to be erotogenic. The consistency across demographic variables is open to multiple interpretations. However, it may be that individual experience or cultural differences (a starting point for some accounts of erogenous zone distribution) are not substantial determining variables. Thus, while S1 does not appear to be the likely site that would support Ramachandran's neural body map proposal, we suggest that the origins of erogenous distribution may derive from a map located elsewhere in the brain.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2013 · Cortex
  • Source
    • "skin temperature elicit similar effects (Lindh et al, 1972; Uvnä s-Moberg and Eriksson, 1996). Superficial and deep vasocongestion of the breast during the arousal phase can result in a proportionate increase in the size of the breast, erythematous maculopapular rash (sex flush) on the skin, areolar tumescence, and an increase in areolar blood flow (Dickinson, 1949; Masters and Johnson, 1966; Levin, 2006). The final stages of nipple erection are characterized by local vasodilatation and increased blood flow, which are triggered by local mediators. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The nipple is a specialized structure that can become erect by cold, sexual arousal, breast-feeding, or other tactile stimulations, which can induce the milk ejection reflex and sexual arousal because of intense sensory innervation. The studies that have been conducted thus far to identify the mechanism of nipple erection (NE) are not sufficient. It has been stated that NE occurs via activation of the sympathetic nervous system and smooth muscle contraction. The purposes of this study were to investigate the existence of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in the nipple-areola complex (NAC) to explain the NE mechanism. Considering that smooth muscle relaxation might be effective in NE, endothelial and neuronal NOS expression and localization were investigated via immunohistochemical methods on sagittal sections from 17 human NACs. The results of this study indicate that eNOS is expressed in the vascular endothelium, ductal epithelium, and smooth muscles, whereas nNOS is expressed in the neural fibers, smooth muscles, ductal epithelium, and vascular endothelium in the NAC. Sinusoidal spaces with endothelial layers similar to those found in penile cavernosal tissue are not found in the NAC. Various mediators are known to affect the function of the NAC smooth muscles; however, this study demonstrates that enzymes (eNOS and nNOS) that synthesize nitric oxide are expressed in the NAC.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2011 · Journal of Andrology

  • No preview · Article ·
Show more