• Reviews the book "The psychology of behavior disorders" (1947) by Norman Cameron (see record #31948-02208-000). According to the reviewer, Cameron, in taking a good step forward by adopting a biosocial field-theoretical approach, is forced to take two steps backward by not making it biopsychosocial, and finally trips and throws the baby of the psychological ego out with the bathwater of the semantically inadequate previous conceptions of it. The final result is a well written, carefully constructed presentation of abnormal psychology, which, however, is unable to deal with many of psychopathology's central problems at other than a descriptive level. The reviewer does not now feel, and has never felt, that the Freudian methodological conceptions were much more than first approximations. However, these conceptions must be sharpened rather than ignored. While Cameron pays lip service to the stupendous achievements of psychoanalysis, he is afraid of all of its most basic implications. The reviewer is sure that as soon as clinicians realize that ego, id, superego, conscious and unconscious, regression, repression, transference, etc., are not descriptions of real entities, but rather abstract concepts to account for easily observable and, in clinical practice, almost daily observed behavioral processes, that they will become better clinicians. Cameron is afraid of these terms as if they were bogeymen, and does not seem to have perceived their true methodological role. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
• Reviews the book "The psychology of behavior disorders" (1947) by Norman Cameron (see record #31948-02208-000). According to the reviewer, Cameron, in taking a good step forward by adopting a biosocial field-theoretical approach, is forced to take two steps backward by not making it biopsychosocial, and finally trips and throws the baby of the psychological ego out with the bathwater of the semantically inadequate previous conceptions of it. The final result is a well written, carefully constructed presentation of abnormal psychology, which, however, is unable to deal with many of psychopathology's central problems at other than a descriptive level. The reviewer does not now feel, and has never felt, that the Freudian methodological conceptions were much more than first approximations. However, these conceptions must be sharpened rather than ignored. While Cameron pays lip service to the stupendous achievements of psychoanalysis, he is afraid of all of its most basic implications. The reviewer is sure that as soon as clinicians realize that ego, id, superego, conscious and unconscious, regression, repression, transference, etc., are not descriptions of real entities, but rather abstract concepts to account for easily observable and, in clinical practice, almost daily observed behavioral processes, that they will become better clinicians. Cameron is afraid of these terms as if they were bogeymen, and does not seem to have perceived their true methodological role. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)