... Since the age of classical Greek philosophy, some paradoxes have been arising regarding physics and motion. On the one hand, one may refer to wave-particle duality (Huygens, 1690;Newton, 1704), which even firstly swayed to the second due to Newton's prominence and Poisson's positivist perspective, it was finally proven and set that paradox (see Poisson spot: Arago & Fresnel, 1818;Poisson, 1818); to the infamous Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox (Einstein, Podolsky, & Rosen, 1935); or to the irreconcilability of Einstein (1915;1916) general relativity (GR) and quantum mechanics (QM) theory (Aspect, Dalibard, & Rogers, 1982;Bell, 1976;Bell et al., 1985;Davisson & Germer, 1927;de Broglie, 1923;Einstein, 1905;Heisenberg, 1927;Planck, 1901ab;Schrödinger, 1926;1935a;1935b;Wheeler, 1978; Young, 1804; Zeilinger, 1986), irreconcilability that has been already pointed out (Ehrenfest, 1909;Grøn, 1979;Kumar, 2024), or, distinguishing it in this paper, Zeno's paradoxes, especially Zeno's paradox of motion regarding Achilles and the continuum problem that was tackled by his master Parmenides (see Chen, 2021;Gale, 1968;Grünbaum, 1968;1973, to expand into the specific paradox). ...