We study the following fault tolerant variant of the interval group testing model: Given four positive integers n, p, s, e, determine the minimum number of questions needed to identify a (possibly empty) set P ⊆ {1,2,..., n} (|P| ≤ p), under the following constraints. Questions have the form “Is I ∩ P ≠ ∅?”, where I can be any interval in {1,2..., n}. Questions are to be organized in s batches of
... [Show full abstract] non-adaptive questions (stages), i.e, questions in a given batch can be formulated relying only on the information gathered with the answers to the questions in the previous batches. Up to e of the answers can be erroneous or lies.
The study of interval group testing is motivated by several applications. remarkably, to the problem of identifying splice sites in a genome. In particular, such application motivates to focus algorithms that are fault tolerant to some degree and organize the questions in few stages, i.e., on the cases when s is small, typically not larger than 2. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to consider fault tolerant strategies for interval group testing.
We completely characterize the fully non-adaptive situation and provide tight bounds for the case of two batch strategies. Our bounds only differ by a factor of for the case p = 1 and at most 2 in the general case.