from book Handbook of Social Psychology (pp.53-76)

Social Exchange Theory

Chapter · January 2006with 38,423 Reads 
How we measure 'reads'
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. Learn more
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-36921-X_3
Issn: 1389-6903
Cite this publication
Toward A Theory of Value - Richard M Emerson Notes on a Theory of Value - Debra Friedman Free Riders and Zealots - James S Coleman Microprocess and Macrostructure - Peter M Blau Linking Power Structure and Power Use - Linda D Molm Reinforcement Processes in Power-Dependence Relations Elements of Interactor Dependence - Peter V Marsden Resources, Interests, Exchange Networks, and Preference Configurations An Exchange Theoretical Approach to Defining Positions in Network Structures - Toshio Yamagishi Generalized Versus Restricted Exchange - Mary Rogers Gillmore Some Implications for Group Process Legitimacy and Justice - John F Stolte Activation of the Norm of Equity in Productive Exchange Emerson's Contibutions to Social Exchange Theory - Karen S Cook A Commentary on the Volume - Jonathan Turner
Social Exchange Theory
Exchange theory has been one of the major theoretical perspectives in the field of social psy-
chology since the early writings of Homans (1961), Blau (1964) and Emerson (1962, 1972).
This theoretical orientation is based on earlier philosophical and psychological orientations
deriving from utilitarianism on the one hand and behaviorism on the other. The vestiges of
both of these theoretical foundations remain evident in the versions of exchange theory that
are current today. In this chapter we will focus mainly on the theoretical contributions of
exchange theory to the analysis of social psychological and sociological phenomena of
importance in understanding the micro-level processes of exchange and the macro-structures
they create in society.
While early debates focused on the nature of the actor that inhabits the world of social
exchange few of these debates remain salient (see Ekeh, 1974; Heath, 1976). We discuss dif-
ferences in the underlying models of the actor in the different variants of exchange theory, but
we do not view these differences as critical to the major enterprise that has emerged over the
last two decades, which has been the efforts of exchange theorists to understand the social
structures created by exchange relations and the ways in which such structures constrain and
enable actors to exercise power and influence in their daily lives. Whether these interactions
are viewed as reciprocal exchanges or negotiated exchanges they are ubiquitous in social life
and important to study.
One major hallmark of recent research on social exchange in the field of sociology is its
attention to the links between social exchange theory and theories of social status, influence,
KAREN S. COOK AND ERIC RICE Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by John Delamater. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 2003.
54 Karen S. Cook and Eric Rice
social networks, fairness, coalition formation, solidarity, trust, affect and emotion. We address
these topics in our review of recent important contributions to exchange theory. Our review is
organized topically. First, we provide an overview of the major theories of social exchange.
Then we draw out some of the relevant distinctions between the different theoretical formu-
lations. After this exercise we discuss the main topics of research that have been studied by
the key contributors to the exchange tradition within the field of sociology over the past two
decades. We conclude with a brief statement concerning directions for future research. In par-
ticular, we focus on the linkages between the exchange tradition of work in sociology and
recent developments in related fields of inquiry such as economic sociology and social net-
works. In our view there are many important topics of research that have yet to be studied
fully within the exchange tradition and that provide an exciting research agenda for the future.
For Homans (1961) the dominant emphasis was the individual behavior of actors in interac-
tion with one another. His primary aim was to explain fundamental processes of social behav-
ior (power, conformity, status, leadership, and justice) from the ground up. Homans believed
that there was nothing that emerges in social groups that cannot be explained by propositions
about individuals as individuals, together with the given condition that they happen to be
interacting. In his effort to embrace this form of reductionism he parted company very clearly
with the work of Peter Blau (1964) who built into his theory of social exchange and social
structure an analysis of "emergent" properties of social systems.
Homans (1961, p. 13) defined social exchange as the exchange of activity, tangible or
intangible, and more or less rewarding or costly, between at least two persons. Cost was
viewed primarily in terms of alternative activities or opportunities foregone by the actors
involved. Reinforcement principles derived from the kind of behaviorism popular in the early
sixties (e.g., the work of B. F. Skinner) were used by Homans to explain the persistence of
exchange relations. Behavior is a function of payoffs, whether the payoffs are provided by the
nonhuman environment or by other humans. Emerson (1972a) subsequently developed a psy-
chological basis for exchange based on these same reinforcement principles.
Homans explained social behavior and the forms of social organization produced by
social interaction by showing how A's behavior reinforced B's behavior (in a two party rela-
tion between actors A and B), and how B's behavior reinforced A's behavior in return. This
was the explicit basis for continued social interaction explained at the "sub-institutional"
level. The existing historical and structural conditions were taken as given. Value is deter-
mined by the actor's history of reinforcement and thus also taken as a given at entry into an
exchange relation. Homans' primary focus was the social behavior that emerged as a result of
the social processes of mutual reinforcement (and the lack of it). Relations could also termi-
nate on the basis of the failure of reinforcement.
Dyadic exchange, the main emphasis of his work, formed the basis for much of his the-
oretical consideration of other important sociological concepts such as distributive justice,
balance, status, leadership, authority, power, and solidarity. Homans' work was often criti-
cized for two main reasons: it was too reductionistic (i.e., it took the principles of psychology
as the basis for sociological phenomena) and in analyzing the sub-institutional level of social
behavior it underplayed the significance of the institutional as well as the social processes and
structures that emerge out of social interaction. In this respect, it is somewhat ironic that one
of Homans' lasting contributions to social psychology has been his early treatment of the
Social Exchange Theory 55
issue of distributive justice in social exchange relations. The irony derives from the fact that
Homans was explicitly much less interested in norms since he was preoccupied with the "sub-
institutional" level of analysis in his study of elementary social behavior. His effort to focus
on elementary behavior is derived in large part from his opposition to the heavily system-
oriented and normative views of Parsons that held sway during the time that he wrote his trea-
tise on social behavior. In his autobiography, Homans (1984) refers to Parsons main work on
the social system as the "yellow peril." We discuss Homans' conception of distributive justice
in greater detail in the section on fairness in exchange relations.
Homans' key propositions framed the study of social behavior in terms of rewards and pun-
ishments. Behavior that is rewarded in general continues (up to the limit of diminishing mar-
ginal utility). His first proposition, the success proposition, states that behavior that generates
positive consequences is likely to be repeated. The second proposition, the stimulus proposition,
states that behavior that has been rewarded on such occasions in the past will be performed in
similar situations. The value proposition, the third proposition, specifies that the more valuable
the result of an action is to an actor, the more likely that action is to be performed.
The fourth proposition, the deprivation-satiation proposition, qualifies the stimulus
proposition introducing the general ideal of diminishing marginal utility: the more often a
person has recently received a particular reward for an action, the less valuable is an addi-
tional unit of that reward. Finally, the fifth proposition specifies when individuals will react
emotionally to different reward situations. People will become angry and aggressive when
they do not receive what they anticipate. Homans (1974) later argues they can become angry
when they do not receive a fair rate of return, introducing the normative concept of distribu-
tive justice into his analysis of dyadic exchange.
Blau, writing at about the same time, framed his micro-exchange theory in terms of
rewards and costs as well, but took a decidedly more economic and utilitarian view of behav-
ior rather than building upon reinforcement principles derived from experimental behavioral
analysis. A key distinction between these two broad perspectives, as Heath (1976) points out,
is whether the actor is forward-looking or backward looking in his determination of what to
do next. Utilitarianism generally looks forward. Actors are viewed as acting in terms of antic-
ipated rewards that benefit them and they tend to choose that alternative course of action that
maximizes benefit (and minimizes cost, but see Molm, Takashashi, & Peterson, 2000).
Reinforcement theories look backwards with actors valuing what has been rewarding to them
in the past. The micro-level exchange theory in Blau's work is embryonic and under-
developed though it is one of the first attempts to apply utilitarianism derived from econom-
ics to social behavior.
Blau viewed social exchange as a process of central significance in social life and as
underlying the relations between groups as well as between individuals. He focused prima-
rily on the reciprocal exchange of extrinsic benefits and the forms of association and emer-
gent social structures that this kind of social interaction created. According to Blau (1964,
p. 91): "Social exchange ... refers to voluntary actions of individuals that are motivated by the
returns they are expected to bring and typically do in fact bring from others." In contrasting
social and economic exchange he emphasizes the fact that it is more likely in social exchange
for the nature of the obligations involved in the exchange to remain unspecified, at least ini-
tially. Social exchange, he argues, "involves the principle that one person does another a
favor, and while there is a general expectation of some future return, its exact nature is defi-
nitely not stipulated in advance" (Blau, 1986, p. 93).
The first third of the book specifies the nature of the social processes that result in asso-
ciations between individuals (e.g., attraction). Two conditions are defined as important in the
  • ... Reciprocation refers to the norm of paying back what we have been given (Emerson, 1976). The general hypotheses tested by social network and social exchange analysts is that reciprocity among actors in networks is related to more influential interpersonal relationships (Cook and Rice, 2006;Marsden and Friedkin, 1993). ...
    ... The reciprocity in others-based processes, such as social comparison, gives rise to a need for interpersonal attachments (Baumeister and Leary, 1995). Therefore, the social influence in a reciprocal social exchange is driven by a social motive of belonging, forming meaningful social relationships, or simply connecting with others (Cook and Rice, 2006). Characteristics, attitudes, and behaviors of reciprocal others will have a stronger influence on the evaluation of one's own circumstances. ...
    Full-text available
    The aim of this study is to understand the effect of asymmetric social comparison on subjective well-being, and how it differs due to reciprocity. Our approach considers the social network of individuals as a local reference group. We tested competing hypotheses on negative and positive effects of comparison with worse-off (downward) and better-off (upward) targets with a representative sample of 1,596 Chileans over the age of 18. The findings support that life satisfaction is influenced by social comparison. By considering the social network as a reference group, the positive effect of downward comparison and the negative effect of upward comparison are confirmed. Upward comparison seems to be more substantial than downward comparison. Additionally, the positive effect of downward comparison decreases slightly with a reciprocal exchange of support between respondents and targets. The application of social network analysis opens a path to understanding the mechanisms underlying social comparison processes.
  • ... Further research by [Lampinen and Cheshire 2016] was conducted in the San Francisco Bay Area. Their investigation, framed within the principles of social exchange theory [Cook and Rice 2006;Emerson 1976], examined the kind of activities that are facilitated through Airbnb during peer exchanges, and clarified how the act of payment creates a sense of certainty that facilitates additional social exchanges. The study showed that host-guest interactions (intrinsic motivations of some hosts), are not overshadowed by the financial benefits (extrinsic motivation of hosting). ...
    Full-text available
    We present a study involving twenty in-depth, semi-structured interviews, a street survey, and online data to understand Airbnb hospitality exchange practices in the context of a developing country. As case studies, we investigate Airbnb practices of both hosts and guests in two tourist venues in Mexico -- the eighth most visited country worldwide. The analysis of the data revealed that Airbnb practices in Mexico have some similarities but also important differences with those previously reported in the literature. We found (1) that money is the main motivation for hosts to participate in Airbnb and that the earned money contributes significantly to the overall income of hosts; (2) that traditions that permeate the Mexican culture motivate hosts to engage in more personal hospitality experiences; (3) that Airbnb host practices lead to the creation of informal jobs that support the local community; and (4) that Airbnb local guests suggest that the lack of contextual information (i.e., the characteristics of the neighborhood where the accommodation is located) is a problem when renting in Mexico owing to safety issues.
  • Article
    Purpose An engaged workforce has never been more important than it is now. Research continues to reveal a strong link between engaged employees and employee performance. Consequently, different strategies continue to be developed to enhance employee engagement (EE) in organisations. Unfortunately, many of these strategies have not worked due to the lack of trust that some employees may have towards organisational leaders. Thus, it is argued that the first step in building an effective EE is building trust, which will erode all sorts of suspicion of the intention of leaders in the organisation. Unfortunately, the literature is not clear about how to build such trust, especially in developing countries where the organisational environment is much different from that in developed ones; making the applicability of models in the developed world quite difficulty in these countries. How can public sector leaders build trust in the organisations in an environment where informality appears to be the norm? The purpose of this paper is therefore to ascertain how trust can be built in public organisations. Design/methodology/approach In order to answer the research questions, as well as obtain in-depth understanding of what is being done, the authors used the mixed methods approach in the data collection for the paper. In using mixed method data collection, the authors took both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Both qualitative and quantitative data were, however, collected concurrently. This was done for the sake of convenience, as there is little study on how to build trust or, even, EE in the Ghanaian context. The authors set out to explore these issues, and the only way for the authors to do so was to undertake the data collection simultaneously. Findings The paper examined critically four main areas to help leadership build trust: credibility, fairness, respect and communication. The study shows that both managers and employees firmly believe in building trust. Leaders were able to discuss the efforts they make to ensure that issues concerning trust building are addressed. At the same time, employees also agreed on the need to strengthen these variables. Practical implications The research identifies areas on which both leadership and employees can continually work to help bridge the gap between them if public organisations are to reap the benefits of EE. The authors are convinced that if the issues discussed here are addressed, and parties work on them, individuals will succeed in their own areas, but so will the organisations, which in turn will help in the development of he country. Originality/value From a theoretical perspective, it extends the work on EE, and offers new insight into this emerging concept from a developing countries perspective, where informality in the public sector is common. Most of the research on trust and EE has been either qualitative or quantitative in nature. Using the mixed methods approach means the authors will be explaining how both can help us better understand the “how” in building trust in the public sector. Thus, the paper is one of the few papers that have used the mixed methods approach to examine how trust can be built in public organisations.
  • Article
    Drawing from social exchange theory and the relational approach to social exchange relationships, we examine liking and competence judgments as predictors of dyadic viability, a new, complementary, operationalization of team viability. We also consider team-level task interdependence as a moderator of these dyadic relationships. Based on data from dyads nested within project teams, we found that both liking and competence significantly relate to teammates’ dyadic viability. Additionally, task interdependence at the team level significantly moderates the dyadic-level effects of liking and competence on dyadic viability, such that the effect of liking judgments is stronger when team task interdependence is high, and the effect of competence judgments is stronger when team task interdependence is low. We also show that aggregated (across team members) measures of dyadic viability are highly similar to proxies that have been classified as team viability in the past—team satisfaction and cohesion. However, the moderating effect of task interdependence was not found with these team-level measures.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between employee values and knowledge management (KM) in sport organizations. Design/methodology/approach Data (N = 234) were collected online through a structured questionnaire from employees of 33 sport organizations in Iran. To test the hypotheses, Pearson correlation test and a regression analysis was conducted. Findings The results from the study revealed that there were significant relationships between employee values and KM. Both instrumental and terminal values significantly influenced KM. Research limitations/implications One limitation of this study is related to the generalizability of the results. Therefore, the current study is required to be replicated with other sport organizations in various sectors (public or private) to improve external validity of the results. Practical implications Based on this study, employees of sport organizations in developing countries tend to store knowledge more than sharing and applying it. The findings can be used by human resources and KM practitioners who are interested in developing organizational knowledge through employees’ values. Originality/value Through this study, the positive roles of employee instrumental and terminal values, as the key drivers in determining intangible assets in organizations, were found.
  • Research
    Full-text available
    Human Resources Management as a discipline has been in existence for decades.
  • Article
    Altruism seems to be perceived in its various hues. In several cases it is mistaken for “pseudo-altruism.” Considering altruism as an expression of self helps clarify this perspective of altruism and, probably adds a spiritual connotation to it. This article looks at altruism from the self point of view and tries to expound the variations in expression of altruism with respect to variations in self-space. On the basis of self-space, three variations of self in progression toward altruism have been proposed. The journey of an egoistic self to a transcended self, expresses the transition from pseudo-altruism to purest form of altruism, the state of self-transcendence. This calls for incorporation of strategies of self-progression for development of altruism. An attempt was made to adopt self-transcendence and its features mentioned in Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, as an independent objective for the present study.
  • Chapter
    Organisationsforschung ist international, interdisziplinär und extrem facettenreich, so wie es auch die betrachteten Organisationen selbst sind. Die Umsetzung ihrer Erkenntnisse in die Praxis, die von den BMBF-geförderten Projekten erwartet wird, geschieht meist durch Beratung, aber wie das möglich ist, dazu gibt es verschiedene Auffassungen. Im Folgenden wird daher zuerst eine Klärung dieser Auffassungen vorgenommen und mit einem Beispiel verdeutlicht. Anschließend werden die Grundlagen für Verstehen, Verständigung und Zusammenarbeit dargelegt, auf die Beratungen ebenso wie die beratene Praxis angewiesen sind, weil ohne sie Misserfolge vorprogrammiert sind. Beratung und Praxis benötigen auch ein wissenschaftlich bewährtes und praktisch tragfähiges Grundverständnis von Organisationen, das im dritten Abschnitt skizziert wird. Ein besonderer Augenmerk wird dabei auf die Frage gelegt, wie durch Beratung das Wissen in der Praxis erweitert werden kann und vor allem, wie den Organisationen geholfen werden kann, selbst besseres Wissen zu generieren. Zum Abschluss werden einige Hinweise gegeben, wie wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse im Beratungsprozess eingesetzt und daraus gewonnen werden können.
  • Chapter
    Identify the theoretical reasons behind the link between social support and education, especially related to teaching and learning in the classroom;