In an attempt to replicate an earlier study which found that tachistoscopically presented high digram-frequency words had a higher recognition threshold than low digram-frequency words, an experiment was performed which used the stimuli employed in the earlier study. The opposite relationship was obtained for low-frequency words (p < .05), while the effect of word frequency was reproduced in the
... [Show full abstract] usually expected direction of frequent words having lower thresholds than infrequent words, but only for words with low digram frequency (p < .05). In a second experiment, novel stimuli were used with the word frequency variable held constant. High digram-frequency words were recognized in significantly fewer trials than low digram-frequency words, with infrequent words (p < .01). No difference was found between words of homogeneous and non-homogeneous position digram-contribution to total digram frequency.