ArticlePDF Available

Media Effects on Jurors

Authors:
Edie Greene at University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Edie Greene
Download full-text PDF
Read full-text
Download citation

Abstract

This article examines the impact on jurors of exposure to media coverage of legal issues. Jurors' decisions may be influenced by a broad range of legally relevant information gleaned from media sources, including newspaper reports, radio and television news, advertising, movies, and televised crime shows and courtroom scenes. The article gives examples of these influences from real-world cases and from simulated research studies. It focuses on the impact of trial-relevant publicity on jurors in cases unrelated to the one being publicized; the ways that media representations of the justice system may influence jurors' expectations and decisions; the influence of insurance company advertisements on jurors' damage awards; and the impact of viewing pornography on jurors' decision making. The paper also explores the psychological processes by which each of these effects may occur and evaluates proposed remedies.
Content uploaded by Edie Greene
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Edie Greene on Oct 27, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Learn more
Content available from Law and Human Behavior
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
... Indeed, the latter may form biased opinions or acquire knowledge about inadmissible evidence because of the coverage of the case prior to the trial (Green, 1990;Hermida, 1994;Reidy, 2005). ...
"They rely on your silence" : Counternarratives, contextualisation and framing in the Belfast Rape Trial and its media coverage.
Thesis
Full-text available
  • Sep 2022
Before discharging the jury in the Belfast Rape Trial (BRT), Judge Patricia Smyth told them that this had probably been “the most difficult trial that any jury in Northern Ireland (NI) has had to sit on” (Gallagher, 2018g, para. 147). The BRT lasted for about 40 days, with more than 30 witnesses giving evidence. Two of the four defendants, Patrick Jackson and Stuart Olding, were rugby stars at the time, and, as a result, the BRT became “the most talked about court case on the island of Ireland” (Kelly & O’Brien, 2018, 00:15), sparking a national debate on consent, victim blaming and male entitlement. To what extent may the BRT itself be regarded as representative of rape cases in general, according to the literature on the investigation of sexual violence cases, on victim blaming, and rape myths more generally? May the media coverage of the case have accounted for the exceptional reaction to, and consequences of, the trial itself ? To what extent is it consistent with the literature on the coverage of sexual violence cases? To what extent may the existing literature on the connections between masculinity, sports and sexual violence, inform our understanding of the alleged rape as well as of the framing of the defendants by the media ? Existing literature highlights the prevalence of sexual violence : In Northern Ireland, for instance, 46% of participants in a study on sexual violence in intimate partner relationships indicated that they had been raped by their partner (Doule & McWilliams, 2018), and Irish figures from 2002 indicate that one out of ten women experience rape at some point in their lives (McGee et al., 2002, pp. 69-70). Besides, the mishandling of rape cases and the secondary victimisation of rape complainants by the criminal justice system, and the influence of rape myths in the courtroom has long been documented (Estrich, 1987; Ehrlich, 2012; Grubb & Turner, 2012; Gillen, 2019; Kennedy, 2021), as well as the victim-blaming attitude of the media when covering rape cases and its influence in defining sexual violence and in setting the public agenda, (McCombs & Shaw, 1972; Benedict, 1992; Cuklanz 1995; Ardovini-Brooker & Caringella-MacDonald, 2002; Thacker & Day, 2017). Finally, the relationship between sexual violence, masculinity and sports has also been long established by researchers (Messner, 1990, 1992, 2005; Sabo, 1994a, 1994b; Connell, 2005). However, literature on most of these topics in Ireland and Northern Ireland is scarce. Thus, I believe that this work may contribute to the growing body of literature on these specific issues on the island of Ireland, especially given the renewed interest which they seem to have been benefiting from in the last few years.
View
... Furthermore, jurors are unable to determine the accuracy or reliability of evidence presented to them (Nicholson, Yarbrough, & Penrod, 2014), or disregard evidence which has been ruled inadmissible (Daftary-Kapur, et al., 2010). Of present importance, forensic evidence is highly influential to the juror decision-making process; this being linked to the portrayal of such evidence in modern media (e.g., Cole & Dioso-Villa, 2009;Greene, 1990). For instance, Greene and Cahill (2012) found that, in cases where a defendant is deemed to be "high-risk" for future dangerousness, juries were more likely to seek the death penalty if they were also presented with neuroimaging evidence. ...
Jurors' expectations and decision-making: Revisiting the CSI effect
Article
Full-text available
  • Jul 2020
  • Bull Br Psychol Soc
It has been argued that the rise in popularity of crime show dramas over the past few years has led to jurors holding unrealistic expectations regarding the type of evidence presented at trial. This has been coined the CSI effect. We investigated the CSI effect and the less well-known Tech effect-assigning more weight to evidence if obtained through technological means-and the impact of crime severity on juror decision-making. However, we argue that as time progresses, such effects will no longer be found to impact juror decision-making processes. We propose that past effects reported in the literature can be explained by considering a novelty bias. Using both frequentist and Bayesian frameworks, we tested this claim. Participants were primed with a newspaper that either contained a forensic, technology, or neutral article. They were then presented with two crime scenarios and asked to provide a verdict and a confidence rating. We find that mock jurors were unaffected by either the priming manipulation or crime severity, finding no evidence for either the CSI or Tech effects. The data suggest jurors are not as easily biased as has been previously argued in the literature, indicating a potential shift in public perceptions and expectations regarding evidence.
View
... In turning to the psychology and law literature, this finding seems to be explained by the pretrial publicity (PTP) effect, which is the publicity of a legal case and its details in the media that may impact the jurors' decision-making (Steblay, Besirevic, Fulero, & Jimenez-Lorente, 1999). The effect of general PTP, which is information about the legal system or about similar cases or perpetrators on juries' decision-making (Greene, 1990), on the judgment of a defendant's guilt has been found to significantly increase when the PTP case was similar to the case being decided by a jury (Greene & Wade, 1988;Groscup, 2015). This means that individuals judge cases, or defendant's guilt, using information readily available, including information or outcomes from similar cases. ...
Legislation Awareness, Cyberbullying Behaviours, and Cyber-Roles in Emerging Adults
Article
Full-text available
  • Dec 2018
Emerging adults are heavy users of technology, potentially increasing their risk of exposure to cyberbullying. This study examined the differences between cyber-roles’ (i.e. bully, victim, bully-victim, uninvolved, average involvement) opinions and awareness of cyberbullying legislation and landmark Canadian cyberbullying cases. Participants were also asked to rate their agreement with aspects of the now-defunct Cyber-Safety Act. Participants were 681 emerging adults (Mage = 20.61, SD = 1.90, range 18 to 25 years) attending a university in Nova Scotia. Results indicated that participants with knowledge of the Rehtaeh Parsons (“R”) case had significantly stronger opinions of both the R and the Amanda Todd (“A”) case than those who were unaware of the R case. Results further indicated that bullies, and to some extent, bully-victims, had the most lenient attitudes toward the illegality of the behaviour and severity of punishment for perpetrators involved in both the A and R case. Most participants incorrectly believed Canada had a federal law against cyberbullying, and a significant minority incorrectly believed Nova Scotia did not have a provincial law against it. Implications for provincial legislation and cyberbullying research are discussed.
View
... Additionally, other work has shown that pretrial exposure to both television and other forms of media can significantly sway jury member attitudes regarding legal policies and verdict endorsements (e.g., Daftary-Kapur, Dumas, & Penrod, 2010;Greene, 1990;Ogloff & Vidmar, 1994;Studebaker & Penrod, 1997). Given the media's potential to influence criminal proceedings (pretrial evidence), a closer look at the interface between media and the criminal justice system may be necessary. ...
Black Racial Stereotypes and Victim Blaming: Implications for Media Coverage and Criminal Proceedings in Cases of Police Violence against Racial and Ethnic Minorities: Victim Blaming and Race
Article
Full-text available
  • Dec 2017
Posthumous stereotypical media portrayals of Michael Brown and other racial and ethnic minority victims of police violence have sparked questions about the influence of racial stereotypes on public opinions about their deaths and criminal proceedings for their killers. However, few studies have empirically investigated how the specific type of information released about a victim impacts opinions surrounding such incidents. Participants (N = 453) read about an altercation that resulted in a shooting death where the race of the victim and shooter (Black vs. White) was randomly assigned. Participants learned either negative, Black male stereotypic or positive, Black male counterstereotypic information about the victim. Next, participants appraised levels of fault and blame, sympathy and empathy for the victim and shooter, and indictment recommendations for the shooter. Findings suggest that the type of information released about a victim can significantly sway attitudes toward the victim and the shooter. Implications for media portrayals of racial/ethnic minority victims of police violence and its impact on criminal sentencing are discussed.
View
... Additionally, other work has shown that pretrial exposure to both television and other forms of media can significantly sway jury member attitudes regarding legal policies and verdict endorsements (e.g., Daftary-Kapur, Dumas, & Penrod, 2010;Greene, 1990;Ogloff & Vidmar, 1994;Studebaker & Penrod, 1997). Given the media's potential to influence criminal proceedings (pretrial evidence), a closer look at the interface between media and the criminal justice system may be necessary. ...
What Social Science Research Says about Police Violence against Racial and Ethnic Minorities: Understanding the Antecedents and Consequences-An Introduction: Police Violence against Racial Minorities
Article
Full-text available
  • Dec 2017
Police violence against racial and ethnic minorities by law enforcement is an international social justice issue that has elicited substantial societal attention, both historically and more recently since the death of Michael Brown in 2014 in the United States. This volume of the Journal of Social Issues integrates theoretical and empirical research to examine police violence (i.e., disproportionate physical and psychological injury and maltreatment) against racial and ethnic minorities and provides policy recommendations directed at reducing this violence from a multidisciplinary perspective. Organized across two substantive sections, one section is devoted to evidence of and factors contributing to police violence against racial and ethnic minorities, including racial stereotyping, implicit bias, and contextual factors. The other section focuses on societal-level, downstream consequences of exposure to this violence for both individual targets and their community, including attitudinal, physical, and mental health consequences. A concluding chapter integrates the special issue articles’ findings and provides new perspectives on policing and race. This opening article to the special issue reviews existing literature and outlines the unique contributions of the included articles on this topic. © 2017 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
View
Buying the Verdict
Article
  • Aug 2023
We document evidence that firms systematically increase specialized, locally targeted advertising following the firm being taken to trial in that given location, precisely following initiation of the suit. In particular, we use legal actions brought against publicly traded firms over the 20-year sample period that progress to trial between 1995 and 2014. In terms of magnitude, the increase is sizable: targeted local advertising increases by 23% (t = 4.37) following the suit. They focus their advertisement spikes specifically toward jury trials, and in fact specifically toward the most likely jury pool. Last, we document that these advertising spikes are associated with verdicts, increasing the probability of a favorable outcome. This paper was accepted by Tomasz Piskorski, finance. Funding: We gratefully acknowledge funding from the National Science Foundation [Grant SciSIP-1535813]. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4896 .
View
View
Director expectations gap and hindsight bias
Article
  • Aug 2020
We evaluate the opinions of directors and other stakeholders and show that independent directors (IDs) are facing an expectations gap about their role. The results of an experiment also indicate that business journalists and investors provided lower evaluative judgements of decisions made by IDs than did directors and that evaluative judgements of financial decisions made by IDs were affected by outcome information (hindsight bias). It is important that regulators and the media, as a key information intermediary, remain cognisant of the effects of hindsight bias on their judgements about ID performance, especially after events such as corporate collapses.
View
Effects of Pretrial Publicity on Male and Female Jurors and Judges in a Mock Rape Trial
Article
  • Dec 1993
A study explored influence of pretrial publicity and gender identity on verdicts and severity of sentence in a mock rape trial. Mock jurors and judges were exposed to four pretrial publicity conditions before watching a simulated rape trial. After viewing the trial, jurors rendered a verdict (guilty or not guilty) and judges prescribed a sentence. The Bern Sex-role Inventory was used to analyze gender identity and its relation to verdict and sentencing. Verdicts were not influenced by pretrial publicity, but sentencing was more severe following exposure of mock judges to pretrial publicity about a mistaken acquittal and less severe following exposure of these judges to pretrial publicity about a mistaken conviction. Subjects classified by the Bern inventory as feminine or androgynous rendered a verdict of “guilty” more often than subjects classified as masculine or undifferentiated. Men who rendered verdicts of “guilty” had less confidence in their judgments than men who found the defendant “not guilty.” Conversely, women who found the defendant “not guilty” expressed less confidence than women who found the defendant “guilty.” The findings are compared and contrasted with similar studies and discussed in regards to gender identity, subjects’ characteristics, and mode of presentation.
View
"No Hatred or Malice, Fear or Affection": Media and Sentencing
Article
  • Jun 2018
We explore how television broadcasting of unrelated criminal justice events affects sentencing. Exploiting as-good-as-random variation in news content before a verdict, we find that sentences are 3 months longer when the verdict is reached after coverage of crime. Sentences increase with media exposure to crime, not crime itself, and the effect tapers off quickly. Our results suggest that professional experience and expertise mitigate the effect of irrelevant external information. This paper highlights the influence of noise in the news cycle: media can temporarily influence decisions by changing what is top of the mind rather than signaling deeper changes in offending or societal concerns.
View
Juror Decision Making: The Importance of Evidence
Article
Full-text available
  • Mar 1987
Explored whether the emphasis on juror competence that appears in most studies of jurors and juries is justified, using data from posttrial interviews with 331 jurors on actual decisions in criminal trials. Measures of legal and extralegal influences on jurors' decisions were employed to estimate a model of juror decision making. Results indicate that Ss' decisions were dominated by evidential issues, particularly evidence concerning the use of force and physical evidence. Jurors were considerably less responsive to characteristics of victims and defendants, although some of these factors significantly affected their decisions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)
View
What's New in the News? The Influence of Well-Publicized News Events on Psychological Research and Courtroom Trials
Article
Full-text available
  • Sep 1984
  • BASIC APPL SOC PSYCH
Two experiments explored the impact of a highly publicized news event (the mistaken identification of an innocent man) on juror decision-making. In Experiment 1,168 students rendered verdicts after reading about a trial that involved eyewitness testimony. Subjects who participated in the experiment while the critical story was prominently in the news were less likely to convict a hypothetical defendant than subjects who participated three months before or afterward. In Experiment 2, subjects were 72 ordinary citizens who either had or had not read a magazine article about a mistakenly identified man. The former subjects were less likely to convict than the latter. These results raise questions about the extent to which current local or world events influence the outcome of psychological research and courtroom trials.
View
View
View
John Hinckley, Jr. and the Insanity Defense: The Public's Verdict
Article
  • Jun 1983
Public furor over the Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity verdict in the trial of John Hinckley, Jr. already has stimulated legal changes in the insanity defense. This study documents more systematically the dimensions of negative public opinion concerning the Hinckley verdict. A survey of Delaware residents shortly after the trial's conclusion indicated that the verdict was perceived as unfair, Hinckley was viewed as not insane, the psychiatrists' testimony at the trial was not trusted, and the vast majority thought that the insanity defense was a loophole. However, survey respondents were unable to define the legal test for insanity and thought Hinckley would be confined only a short period of time, contrary to the estimates of experts. These findings, in conjunction with other research showing the public is not well informed about the insanity defense, underscore the importance of examining determinants of opinion about the insanity defense before additional reform is undertaken.
View
View
Prediction in Psychiatry: An Example of Misplaced Confidence in Experts
Article
  • Feb 1978
Although prediction is usually considered an integral part of science, there appears to be at least one situation in which prediction is as much guesswork as science. This is the prediction of a patient's potential dangerousness by psychiatrists. Our paper reports the findings of a three year longitudinal study of specific psychiatric predictions of dangerousness. We report data on: the impact of non-psychiatric factors in these decisions; the justifications offered by psychiatrists for a finding of dangerousness; the extent to which the psychiatric recommendations are accepted by the court; and the level of accuracy of the psychiatric predictions. Our data suggest that the confidence placed in psychiatry's ability to predict the potential of dangerous behavior is unjustified.
View
View
A Theory of the Acquisition of Cognitive Skills
Article
  • Feb 1978
The paper describes the ACT theory of learning. The theory is embodied as a computer simulation program that makes predictions about human learning of various cognitive skills such as language fluency, study skills for social science texts, problem-solving skills in mathematics, and computer programming skills. The learning takes place within the ACT theory of the performance of such skills. This theory involves a propositional network representation of general factual knowledge and a production system representation of procedural knowledge. Skill learning mainly involves addition and modification of the productions. There are five mechanisms by which this takes place: Designation, strengthening, generalization, discrimination, and composition. Each of these five learning mechanisms is discussed in detail and related to available data in procedural learning.
View
The question of pornography: Research findings and policy implications.
Article
  • Jan 1987
This book is designed to give the reader the most up-to-date summary of the scientific research on the effects of exposure to sexually explicit images in antisocial attitudes and behaviors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
View