Is the elderly primipara really at high risk?

Journal of Perinatal Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.36). 02/1979; 7(2):108-12. DOI: 10.1515/jpme.1979.7.2.108
Source: PubMed


During a five-year period, from 1970 through 1974, 26.776 deliveries occurred in our department, of which 55 (0.6%) were in elderly primiparae (EP). This group was compared with two control groups. The first comprised 97 women aged 30--34 years, and the second one, 250 women between 20 and 29 years of age. The parameters investigated were: The gynecologic past history, the course of the present pregnancy, labor, delivery and fetal outcome. In most of the cases, no significant differences were found between the EP group and the control groups. A striking difference was observed in the rate of cesarean sections, which was 49.1% in the EP group, as against only 2.3% in the age group 20--29 years. It may be concluded that by more liberal use of cesarean sections, available means of antenatal care, and prompt intervention in cases of postmaturity and prolonged labor, one can reduce the maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality, and that the EP, although a group at risk, has nowadays a better outlook for both mother and fetus.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Midtrimester amniocentesis for the diagnosis of genetic abnormalities antenatally is now standard care for women who are at special risk because of age or previous reproductive history. We reviewed reproductive losses after genetic amniocentesis in 2,300 completed pregnancies studied at our own diagnostic center in order to reassess the inherent risks associated with the procedure. There were 63 (2.84%) total losses in the study group, the bulk of which occurred between the time of the amniocentesis and 28 weeks' gestation (2.07%). Anterior placentation was associated with a twofold increase in losses when compared to posterior placentation (3.06% versus 1.57%, p < 0.05). Significantly more losses (4.76%, p < 0.01) occurred with unknown placentation than in those patients in whom placental location was assessed sonographically. When the details of the losses were investigated, a minimum estimate for the risk of a procedure-related fetal death was in the range of 0.6% to 0.9%. A control group of 331 patients was selected from among women who were older than 35 years of age to whom genetic amniocentesis was offered but who declined the procedure. Six losses (1.81%) were observed in this group of patients, not significantly different from the study group. Only a single loss (0.30%) occurred between 16 and 28 weeks' gestation in the control group, significantly (p < 0.03) fewer than in the same time interval in the study group (2.07%). The absolute difference in total losses between the study group and the control group is consistent with the estimated procedure-related loss of 0.6% to 0.9%. We conclude that, despite the relative safety of midtrimester amniocentesis, there is an inherent procedure-related risk that may be higher with anterior placentation. Furthermore, the use of static and real-time sonography provides the operator with knowledge that may be important in achieving a safe amniocentesis and in assessing the possible problems that may arise immediately after the procedure.
    No preview · Article · Aug 1982 · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It has been thought that pregnancy outcomes of women 35 years and older are less favorable than those of women under 35 years of age. To examine this, the records of 188 women, 35 years of age or greater, cared for in the Nurse-Midwifery Service at Roosevelt Hospital, New York City, from 1977–1981 were reviewed.
    No preview · Article · Feb 1983 · Journal of Nurse-Midwifery
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A 3-year study of women ages 35 years and older who were delivered at Women's Hospital of Long Beach from January 1, 1981, to December 31, 1983, was performed to study the risks involved with advanced maternal age. The study group included 1023 women who were 35 years and older, and they were divided into parous and nulliparous groups. A control group consisting of 5343 women aged 20 to 25 years was used for comparison. Each group was analyzed for the following parameters: pregnancy complications, labor complications, delivery factors, and neonatal outcome. The results show very few statistical differences in the factors analyzed. On the basis of this 3-year study it appears that pregnancies in women of advanced maternal age in the 1980s who are delivered in a modern tertiary care center may be of no higher risk for adverse outcome than pregnancies in younger parturients.
    No preview · Article · Jun 1985 · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Show more