Part C of this three part series is the presentation from the Oxford style debate held at the Tenth Annual International Conference
Promoting Business Ethics between Laura Hartman, J.D., and Dr. Moses Pava on topics related to the EverQuest® v. EverCrack case (Part B). In a traditional Oxford style debate, two debaters take opposing viewpoints and the third debater
argues the neutral position. At the Conference, the modified format featured the two debaters presenting diametrically opposing
views – corporate responsibility versus personal responsibility. This modified format was also used during the Ethics Awareness
Week (Part A), with University professors presenting the debate before the student body. Ms. Hartman’s position focused on
the personal responsibility by Mr Woolley while Dr. Pava opined that Sony Online Entertainment had corporate responsibility
toward Mr. Woolley and all other individuals similarly situated.