ChapterPDF Available

An Overview of Purple Bacteria: Systematics, Physiology, and Habitats


Abstract and Figures

Anoxygenic phototrophic purple bacteria are a major group of photosynthetic microorganisms widely distributed in nature, primarily in aquatic habitats. Nearly 50 genera of these organisms are known and some have become prime model systems for the experimental dissection of photosynthesis. Purple sulfur bacteria differ from purple nonsulfur bacteria on both metabolic and phylogenetic grounds, but species of the two major groups often coexist in illuminated anoxic habitats in nature. Purple sulfur bacteria are strong photoautotrophs and capable of limited photoheterotrophy, but they are poorly equipped for metabolism and growth in the dark. By contrast, purple nonsulfur bacteria, nature’s preeminent photoheterotrophs, are capable of photoautotrophy, and possess diverse capacities for dark metabolism and growth. Several purple bacteria inhabit extreme environments, including extremes of temperature, pH, and salinity. Collectively, purple bacteria are important phototrophs because they (1) consume a toxic substance, H2S, and contribute organic matter to anoxic environments by their autotrophic capacities; (2) consume organic compounds, primarily non-fermentable organic compounds, in their roles as photoheterotrophs; and (3) offer scientists in the photosynthesis community a smörgasbord of molecular diversity for the study of photosynthesis.
Content may be subject to copyright.
C. Neil Hunter, Fevzi Daldal, Marion C. Thurnauer and J. Thomas Beatty (eds): The Purple Phototrophic Bacteria, pp. 1–15.
Chapter 1
*Author for correspondence, email:
An Overview of Purple Bacteria: Systematics,
Physiology, and Habitats
Michael T. Madigan* and Deborah O. Jung
Department of Microbiology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901, U.S.A.
Summary .................................................................................................................................................................. 2
I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 2
II. Systematics of Purple Bacteria .......................................................................................................................... 3
A. Purple Sulfur Bacteria .......................................................................................................................... 4
B. Purple Nonsulfur Bacteria .................................................................................................................... 4
III. Physiology of Purple Bacteria ............................................................................................................................ 4
A. Purple Sulfur Bacteria .......................................................................................................................... 4
B. Purple Nonsulfur Bacteria .................................................................................................................... 6
1. Photoheterotrophy ....................................................................................................................... 6
2. Dark Growth ................................................................................................................................ 7
3. Nitrogen Fixation ......................................................................................................................... 7
IV. Habitats of Purple Bacteria ................................................................................................................................. 7
A. Purple Sulfur Bacteria .......................................................................................................................... 7
1. Blooms in Strati ed Lakes ........................................................................................................... 7
2. Microbial Mats ............................................................................................................................. 8
B. Purple Nonsulfur Bacteria .................................................................................................................... 9
1. Sewage ....................................................................................................................................... 9
2. Purple Nonsulfur Bacteria in Waste Lagoons ............................................................................. 9
V. Purple Bacteria in Extreme Environments .......................................................................................................... 9
A. Thermophilic Purple Bacteria ............................................................................................................. 10
1. Thermochromatium tepidum .................................................................................................... 10
2. Other Thermophilic Purple Bacteria ..........................................................................................10
B. Halophilic and Alkaliphilic Purple Bacteria ......................................................................................... 10
C. Acidophilic Purple Bacteria ................................................................................................................ 11
D. Purple Bacteria from Permanently Cold Habitats ............................................................................... 11
E. Environmental Limits to Photosynthesis in Purple Bacteria ............................................................... 12
VI. Final Remarks .................................................................................................................................................. 12
Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................................... 12
References .............................................................................................................................................................. 12
©2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
2Michael T. Madigan and Deborah O. Jung
Anoxygenic phototrophic purple bacteria are a major group of photosynthetic microorganisms widely distributed
in nature, primarily in aquatic habitats. Nearly 50 genera of these organisms are known and some have become
prime model systems for the experimental dissection of photosynthesis. Purple sulfur bacteria differ from purple
nonsulfur bacteria on both metabolic and phylogenetic grounds, but species of the two major groups often
coexist in illuminated anoxic habitats in nature. Purple sulfur bacteria are strong photoautotrophs and capable
of limited photoheterotrophy, but they are poorly equipped for metabolism and growth in the dark. By contrast,
purple nonsulfur bacteria, nature’s preeminent photoheterotrophs, are capable of photoautotrophy, and possess
diverse capacities for dark metabolism and growth. Several purple bacteria inhabit extreme environments,
including extremes of temperature, pH, and salinity. Collectively, purple bacteria are important phototrophs
because they (1) consume a toxic substance, H2S, and contribute organic matter to anoxic environments by
their autotrophic capacities; (2) consume organic compounds, primarily non-fermentable organic compounds,
in their roles as photoheterotrophs; and (3) offer scientists in the photosynthesis community a smörgasbord of
molecular diversity for the study of photosynthesis.
Abbreviations: BChl – bacteriochlorophyll; LH – light-harvest-
ing; Rba. – Rhodobacter; Rcy. – Rhodocyclus; Rfx. – Rhodoferax;
Rps. – Rhodopseudomonas; Rsp. – Rhodospirillum; Tch.Ther-
I. Introduction
Anoxygenic phototrophic pur ple bacteria are a major
group of phototrophic microorganisms that inhabit
aquatic and terrestrial environments. Purple bacte-
ria that inhabit oxic habitats and which carry out
photosynthesis only aerobically are called ‘aerobic
anoxygenic phototrophs’ and are covered in Chapter
3 (Yurkov and Csotonyi). The current chapter cov-
ers only the classical purple bacteria: purple sulfur
bacteria and purple nonsulfur bacteria.
Purple bacteria are photosynthetic gram-negative
prokaryotes that convert light energy into chemical
energy by the process of anoxygenic photosynthesis.
Purple bacteria contain photosynthetic pigments–bac-
teriochlorophylls and carotenoids and can grow
autotrophically with CO2 as sole carbon source.
Many genera of purple bacteria are known and the
organisms share many basic properties with their non-
phototrophic relatives. Some general characteristics
of purple bacteria are listed in Table 1.
Purple bacteria share with oxygenic phototrophic
prokaryotes the cyanobacteria the ability to
conserve energy by photophosphorylation. How-
ever, unlike cyanobacteria and aerobic anoxygenic
phototrophs, photosynthesis in purple bacteria only
occurs under anoxic (O2-free) conditions. This is also
true of the other classical anoxygenic phototrophs:
green sulfur bacteria, green nonsulfur bacteria, and
the heliobacteria (Blankenship et al., 1995). Purple
bacteria require anoxic conditions for phototrophic
growth because pigment synthesis in these organisms
is repressed by molecular oxygen (Cohen-Bazire et
al., 1957). Thus, the competitive success of purple
bacteria in nature requires both light and anoxic
conditions. This combination is most commonly
found in lakes, ponds, estuaries, and other aquatic
environments where H2S is present (Pfennig, 1967,
1978a, 1989). Once these general conditions are
met, the exact physiochemical nature of the habitat
(sulfi de concentration, pH, light quality and intensity,
temperature) controls the abundance and diversity of
purple bacteria that develop there (Pfennig, 1978a,
1989; Madigan, 1988).
Purple bacteria participate in the anoxic cycling
of carbon both as primary producers (CO2 xation,
photoautotrophy) and as light-stimulated consumers
of reduced organic compounds (photoheterotrophy).
In certain habitats particularly favorable for their
development, purple bacteria have been shown to
be signifi cant primary producers (Czeczuga, 1968;
Takahashi and Ichimura, 1968; Overmann et al.,
1994, 1996, 1999). However, in most illuminated
sulfi dic habitats the role of purple bacteria as H2S
consumers is probably more important than any
contribution they make to primary production; H2S is
a highly poisonous substance for plants and animals
and also for many bacteria. The oxidation of sulfi de
by purple bacteria yields nontoxic forms of sulfur,
such as elemental sulfur (S0) and sulfate (SO4
Sulfi de oxidation thus allows the upper waters of a
lake to remain oxic and suitable for plants, animals,
and aerobic bacteria.
Chapter 1 Overview of Purple Bacteria
II. Systematics of Purple Bacteria
Purple sulfur bacteria and purple nonsulfur bacte-
ria were originally distinguished on physiological
grounds based on their tolerance and utilization
of sulfi de. Purple sulfur bacteria were species that
tolerated millimolar levels of sulfi de and oxidized
sulfi de to sulfur globules stored intracellularly (Fig.
1a), while purple nonsulfur bacteria were species that
did neither (van Niel, 1932, 1944). However, classic
chemostat experiments by Hansen and van Gemerden
(1972) showed that these criteria for classifying
purple bacteria were not absolute. At low levels of
sulfi de, typically less than 0.5 mM, most species of
purple nonsulfur bacteria will grow and in so doing,
oxidize sulfi de to S0, S4O6
2–, or SO4
2–. Nevertheless,
an important distinction in the sulfi de metabolism
of purple sulfur and purple nonsulfur bacteria re-
mains: any S0 formed by purple nonsulfur bacteria
is not stored intracellularly, but instead is deposited
outside the cell (Hansen and van Gemerden, 1972;
Brune, 1995) (species of Ectothiorhodospiraceae are
an exception here). Thus, when grown on sulfi de, it
is easy to differentiate a purple sulfur from a purple
nonsulfur bacterium because of the microscopically
obvious globules of S0 formed (Fig. 1a).
Subsequent isolations of purple nonsulfur bac-
teria from highly sulfi dic habitats have shown that
many species of this group are actually quite sulfi de
tolerant. For example, both the marine species
Rhodobacter (originally Rhodopseudomonas, Rps.)
sulfi dophilus and the cold-active species Rhodoferax
antarcticus (isolated from the sulfi dic bottom waters
Table 1. General properties of anoxygenic purple phototrophic bacteriaa
Property Examples
Groups/phylogeny Purple sulfur bacteria (gammaproteobacteria); purple nonsulfur bacteria (alpha-
or betaproteobacteria)
Major species studied Allochromatium vinosum and Thiocapsa roseopersicina (purple sulfur bacteria);
Rhodobacter capsulatus,Rhodobacter sphaeroides,Rhodospirillum rubrum, and
Rhodopseudomonas palustris (purple nonsulfur bacteria)
Pigments/color of dense cell suspensions BChl a or b; major carotenoids include spirilloxanthin, spheroidene, lycopene,
and rhodopsin, and their derivatives; cell suspensions purple, purple-red, purple-
violet, red, orange, brown, or yellow brown (BChl a-containing species); green or
yellow (BChl b-containing species)
Location of pigments in cells Within intracytoplasmic membranes arranged as membrane vesicles, tubes,
bundled tubes, or in stacks resembling lamellae
Absorption maxima of living cells BChl a-containing species: near 800 nm, and anywhere from 815–960 nm; BChl
b-containing species: 835–850 nm and 1010–1040 nm
Electron donors/sulfur globulesbH2S, S0, S2O3
2–, H2, Fe2+; if S0 is produced from the oxidation of sulfi de, the S0 is
stored intracellularly only in certain purple sulfur bacteria (see Fig. 1a)
Photoheterotrophy/dark respiratory growth Purple sulfur bacteria limited on both accounts; purple nonsulfur bacteria
typically diverse on both accounts
aAll purple bacteria are gram-negative prokaryotes. All species contain peptidoglycan and an outer membrane containing lipopolysac-
charide. bVirtually all purple bacteria are capable of autotrophic growth. When growing autotrophically, the Calvin cycle (reductive
pentose phosphate cycle) is used as the mechanism for CO2 xation
Fig. 1. Phase photomicrographs of phototrophic purple bacteria.
(a) Cells of a strain of the purple sulfur bacterium Thermochro-
matium tepidum isolated from a New Mexico (USA) hot spring.
Note the bright refractile intracellular sulfur globules (arrows).
(b) Cells of Rhodobaca bogoriensis, an alkaliphilic purple non-
sulfur bacterium isolated from Lake Bogoria (Kenya). If purple
nonsulfur bacteria oxidize sulfi de, any S0 they produce remains
outside the cell. Cells of Tch. tepidum are about 1.5 µm wide and
cells of Rbc. bogoriensis are about 0.8 µm wide.
4Michael T. Madigan and Deborah O. Jung
of the permanently frozen freshwater Lake Fryxell,
McMurdo Dry Valleys) can tolerate over 4 mM
sulfi de (Hansen and Veldkamp, 1973; Jung et al.,
2004). This concentration of sulfi de is toxic to many
purple sulfur bacteria (Pfennig, 1967, 1978a, 1989)!
The original classifi cation of purple bacteria on the
basis of sulfi de metabolism has been supported by
molecular criteria. Phylogenetic analyses of purple
bacteria based on comparative 16S rRNA sequencing
have shown that purple sulfur bacteria are species of
gammaproteobacteria while purple nonsulfur bacteria
are either alpha- or betaproteobacteria (Imhoff et al.,
2005) (Tables 1 and 2).
A. Purple Sulfur Bacteria
Over 25 genera of purple sulfur bacteria are now
recognized, consisting of a variety of morphological
types (Table 2). Purple sulfur bacteria include both
species that store S0 inside the cell (family Chromatia-
ceae, see Fig. 1a), and those that produce extracellular
S0 (Ectothiorhodospiraceae) (Table 1). [It should
be noted that research on the mechanism of sulfi de
oxidation by Allochromatium vinosum has shown that
the ‘intracellular sulfur’ produced by this organism
actually accumulates in the periplasm rather than in
the cytoplasm (Pattaragulwanit et al., 1998); this is
likely true for all species of Chromatiaceae as well].
Most laboratory studies of purple sulfur bacteria have
focused on Allochromatium and Thiocapsa species
(Table 1) since these are the most easily grown. Many
species of purple sulfur bacteria are ‘extremophilic’
species, including in particular, species that grow
best at high salt and/or pH (Table 2).
B. Purple Nonsulfur Bacteria
Twenty genera of purple nonsulfur bacteria are now
recognized (Table 2). Species of Rhodobacter and
Rhodopseudomonas have been the workhorses for
laboratory studies of anoxygenic photosynthesis
(Table 1). But many other interesting species, some
of which have one or more unusual metabolic fea-
tures, are also known. For example, extremophilic
species inhabiting hot, cold, salty, alkaline (Fig. 1b),
and acidic environments have been isolated and will
be discussed in a later section of this chapter (see
section V).
As shown in Table 2, all purple nonsulfur bacteria
are proteobacteria, and phylogenetic trees show the
various species to be closely related to nonphototro-
phic species (Imhoff et al., 2005). If one considers
the fact that the pigments and photocomplexes in
the different species of purple nonsulfur bacteria
are very similar, this suggests that the acquisition of
phototrophic capacity in purple nonsulfur bacteria
has occurred by lateral gene transfer. Sequence
analyses of photocomplex proteins have confi rmed
this (Nagashima et al., 1997). Table 2 also lists the
three letter genus name abbreviations for both purple
sulfur and nonsulfur bacteria; these abbreviations will
be used throughout this book.
III. Physiology of Purple Bacteria
Purple bacteria are relatively easy to grow in labo-
ratory culture; in most cases all that is needed is an
anoxic mineral medium supplemented with either
sulfi de plus bicarbonate (photoautotrophic growth) or
an organic compound (photoheterotrophic growth).
Because of this, and because anoxygenic photosyn-
thesis is a simpler form of photosynthesis than the
oxygenic process, purple bacteria have emerged as
ideal model systems for dissecting the physiology,
biochemistry and molecular biology of photosynthe-
sis. Moreover, anoxygenic photosynthesis preceded
oxygenic photosynthesis on Earth by billions of
years. Thus, studies of purple and other anoxygenic
phototrophs have contributed in major ways to our
understanding of the evolution of photosynthesis
(Raymond et al., 2003; Chapter 2, Swingley et al.).
A. Purple Sulfur Bacteria
The physiology of purple sulfur bacteria is inti-
mately linked to sulfi de, and large populations of
purple sulfur bacteria are observed in nature only in
illuminated environments where sulfi de is present
(Pfennig, 1967, 1978a, 1989). This implies that the
growth of purple sulfur bacteria in nature is primarily
phototrophic. If growth is photoautotrophic, sulfi de,
thiosulfate or H2 are used as photosynthetic electron
donors (Trüper and Fischer, 1982; Madigan, 1988;
Brune, 1995). A few species can also use ferrous
(Fe2+) iron as an electron donor, oxidizing it to fer-
ric (Fe3+) iron (Ehrenreich and Widdel, 1994), and at
least one species, a strain of Thiocapsa, can use nitrite
) as photosynthetic electron donor, oxidizing it
to nitrate (NO3
In addition to autotrophic growth, a few organic
carbon sources are photoassimilated by purple sulfur
Chapter 1 Overview of Purple Bacteria
Table 2. Genera of anoxygenic phototrophic purple bacteria
Taxonomy/Phylogeny Genus Genus abbreviationaMorphology
Purple Nonsulfur Bacteria
Alphaproteobacteria RhodobacacRca. Cocci to short rods
Rhodobacter Rba. Rods
Rhodovulum Rdv. Rods-Cocci
RhodopseudomonascRps. Budding rods
RhodoblastuscRbl. Budding rods
Blastochloris Blc. Budding rods
Rhodomicrobium Rmi. Budding rods
Rhodobium Rbi. Rods
Rhodoplanes Rpl. Rods
RhodocistacRcs. Spirilla
Rhodospirillum Rsp. Spirilla
Phaeospirillum Phs. Spirilla
RhodopilacRpi. Cocci
Rhodospira Rsa. Spirilla
RhodovibriocRhv. Vibrio
RhodothallasiumcRts. Spirilla
Roseospira Ros. Spirilla
Roseospirillum Rss. Spirilla
Betaproteobacteria Rhodocyclus Rcy. Curled vibrios
RhodoferaxcRfx. Rods, vibrios
Rubrivivax Rvi. Rods, curved rods
Purple Sulfur Bacteria
Family ChromatiaceaebAllochromatium Alc. Rods
Amoebobacter Amb. Cocci in plates or clumps
Chromatium Chr. Rods
HalochromatiumcHch. Rods
Isochromatium Isc. Rods
Lamprobacter Lpb. Rods
Lamprocystis Lpc. Cocci in clusters
Marichromatium Mch. Rods
Rhabdochromatium Rbc. Rods
ThermochromatiumcTch. Rods
ThioalkalicoccuscTac. Cocci
Thiobaca Tba. Rods
Thiocapsa Tca. Cocci
Thiococcus Tco. Cocci
Thiocystis Tcs. Cocci to short rods
Thiodictyon Tdc. Rods forming aggregates
Thiofl avicoccus Tfc. Cocci
ThiohalocapsacThc. Cocci
Thiolamprovum Tlp. Cocci
Thiopedia Tpd. Cocci, often in plates
Thiorhodococcus Trc. Cocci
Thiorhodovibrio Trv. Vibrios to spirilla
Thiospirillum Tsp. Spirilla
Family EctothiorhodospiraceaebEctothiorhodospiracEct. Vibrios to spirilla
HalorhodospiracHlr. Vibrios to spirilla
ThiorhodospiracTrs. Vibrios to spirilla
Ectothiorhodosinus Ets. Rods
aAbbreviations in accordance with Imhoff and Madigan (2004). bSpecies of Chromatiaceae store sulfur from the oxidation of sulfi de
intracellularly (see Fig. 1A); species of Ectothiorhodospiraceae do not. cContain one or more extremophilic species growing at an
extreme of temperature, pH, or salinity greater than marine salinity
6Michael T. Madigan and Deborah O. Jung
bacteria. Organic acids and fatty acids are the pre-
ferred substrates, but short-chain alcohols and even
carbohydrates are used by certain species (Sojka,
1978). Photoheterotrophic growth of Allochroma-
tium vinosum and other Allochromatium species
that are capable of assimilatory sulfate reduction
does not require sulfi de. However, some purple
sulfur bacteria will not grow without sulfi de and are
also nutritionally quite restricted. These include the
large-celled Chromatium species such as Chromatium
okenii and Chromatium weissei, and Thiospirillum
(Trüper, 1978), as well as the thermophilic species
Thermochromatium (Tch.) tepidum (Madigan, 1986)
(Fig. 1a). Sulfi de is required for growth of these
species and the only organic compounds that are
photoassimilated are acetate and pyruvate (Trüper
1981; Madigan, 1986).
Dark growth of some purple sulfur bacteria is pos-
sible. For example, certain Chromatiaceae, including
species of Allochromatium, Thiocystis, Amoebo-
bacter, and Thiocapsa, can grow in darkness as
either chemoorganotrophs or chemolithotrophs when
the oxygen concentration is signifi cantly reduced
[microaerobic growth; Kämpf and Pfennig, 1980].
Thiocapsa roseopersicina and Thiocystis violacea
are the most oxygen tolerant purple sulfur bacte-
ria (Kondratieva et al., 1976; Kämpf and Pfennig,
1980); however, respiratory growth of these species
is very slow compared with phototrophic growth.
If one considers that dark growth of purple sulfur
bacteria in nature puts them in direct competition
with nonphototrophic bacteria as well as with purple
nonsulfur bacteria, the ecological signifi cance of dark
metabolism by purple sulfur bacteria is probably mi-
nor. It is more likely that dark energy metabolism by
purple sulfur bacteria helps these organisms survive
intermittently oxygenated environments or is used as
a means to generate ATP at night, rather than being a
major means of supporting extended growth in nature
(van Gemerden, 1968).
B. Purple Nonsulfur Bacteria
Purple nonsulfur bacteria are a physiologically versa-
tile group of purple bacteria that can grow well both
phototrophically and in darkness. Growth of some
purple nonsulfur bacteria, for example, Rhodobacter
(Rba.) capsulatus, is possible under phototrophic
conditions with either CO2 or organic carbon, or in
darkness by respiration, fermentation, or chemoli-
thotrophy. This makes Rba. capsulatus probably the
most metabolically versatile of all known bacteria
(Madigan and Gest, 1979). Carbon metabolism in
purple nonsulfur bacteria has been summarized in
the excellent reviews by Tabita (1995) and by Gibson
and Harwood (1995); see also Chapter 28, Romagnoli
andTabita; and Chapter 29, Harwood.
1. Photoheterotrophy
Under phototrophic (anoxic/light) conditions,
typical purple nonsulfur bacteria can grow photo-
autotrophically with H2 or low levels of sulfi de as
electron donors; a few species can use S2O3
2– or Fe2+
as photosynthetic electron donors (Ehrenreich and
Widdel, 1994; Brune, 1995). However, most purple
nonsulfur bacteria grow best as photoheterotrophs in
media containing a readily useable organic compound,
such as malate or pyruvate, and ammonia as nitrogen
source (Sojka, 1978).
Yeast extract is a common addition to media
formulated for purple nonsulfur bacteria (Biebl and
Pfennig, 1981). Yeast extract is a source of B-vitamins,
one or more of which are required by the majority
of recognized species of purple nonsulfur bacteria.
Requirements for thiamine, nicotinic acid, biotin,
and p-aminobenzoic acid are the most common. Re-
quirements for B-complex vitamins have never been
observed in purple sulfur bacteria, although many spe-
cies require vitamin B12, a growth factor required by
only a handful of purple nonsulfur bacteria (Pfennig,
1978b; Siefert and Koppenhagen, 1982). However,
beyond its role as a source of vitamins, yeast extract
also stimulates the growth of purple nonsulfur bac-
teria because of its assortment of organic compounds
that can fuel photoheterotrophic growth.
Several individual organic compounds support
photoheterotrophic growth of purple nonsulfur
bacteria. Organic acids, amino acids, fatty acids,
alcohols, carbohydrates, and even C-1 compounds
are metabolized by different species (Sojka, 1978;
Trüper and Pfennig, 1981). With minor exceptions,
the citric acid cycle intermediates malate, succinate,
and fumarate are universally used, as are pyruvate
and acetate; many species also use ethanol, lactate,
and propionate (Sojka, 1978; Trüper and Pfennig,
1981). A few purple nonsulfur bacteria photoassimi-
late aromatic compounds such as benzoate, hydroxy
derivatives of benzoate, and cyclohexane carboxylate
(Gibson and Harwood, 1995). Enrichment cultures
employing benzoate as carbon source typically yield
strains of Phaeospirillum (formerly Rhodospirillum)
Chapter 1 Overview of Purple Bacteria
fulvum or Rps. palustris (Gibson and Harwood, 1995).
Benzene is not utilized by these or other purple non-
sulfur bacteria, but at least one aromatic hydrocarbon,
toluene, supports photoheterotrophic growth of cer-
tain strains of Blastochloris sulfoviridis (Zengler et
al., 1999). Growth of purple nonsulfur bacteria on
aliphatic hydrocarbons has not been described.
2. Dark Growth
Many of the same organic compounds that are photo-
assimilated by purple nonsulfur bacteria can also be
used as electron donors and carbon sources for dark
respiratory growth. Oxygen tolerances for respira-
tory growth vary among species, but some, such as
Rhodobacter species, can be grown with vigorous
aeration (Madigan, 1988). Certain purple nonsulfur
bacteria can grow under anoxic dark conditions by
either fermentation or anaerobic respiration. For
example, pyruvate (Uffen and Wolfe, 1970; Gurgen
et al., 1976) and certain sugars (Madigan and Gest,
1978; Schultz and Weaver, 1982) support fermenta-
tive growth of some purple nonsulfur bacteria, most
notably Rhodospirillum (Rsp.) rubrum and Rba.
capsulatus. Extensive fermentative growth of Rba.
capsulatus requires addition of an accessory oxidant
such as dimethyl sulfoxide or trimethylamine-N-oxide
(Madigan and Gest, 1978; Schultz and Weaver, 1982).
Rba. sphaeroides is capable of true denitrifi cation,
reducing NO3
to N2 using nonfermentable carbon
sources as electron donors (Satoh et al., 1976).
Dark chemolithotrophic growth of certain species
of purple nonsulfur bacteria is possible using H2 or
2– as electron donors. In Rba. capsulatus, chemo-
lithotrophic growth on H2 occurs and the organism
can be grown in a synthetic medium supplied with
the gases H2, O2, and CO2 as electron donor, electron
acceptor, and carbon source, respectively (Madigan
and Gest, 1979). Whether chemolithotrophy is a
signifi cant growth strategy for purple bacteria in
nature is unknown, but it is likely that the ability
to conserve energy from the oxidation of inorganic
electron donors gives purple bacteria an added
physiological dimension in competition with non-
phototrophic bacteria.
3. Nitrogen Fixation
With only a couple of known exceptions, purple non-
sulfur bacteria can fi x nitrogen (N2 + 8H 2NH3 +
H2) (Madigan, 1995). The Rhodobacter species Rba.
capsulatus and Rba. sphaeroides grow most rapidly
with N2 as sole nitrogen source and show the highest
rates of in vivo nitrogenase activity (Madigan et al.,
1984). Consequently, Rhodobacter species tend to
dominate enrichment cultures for purple nonsulfur
bacteria that employ nitrogen fi xation as a selective
condition. Because in general purple nonsulfur bac-
teria are excellent nitrogen-fi xing bacteria (Madigan
et al., 1984), it is likely that the capacity for di azo-
tro phy confers a signifi cant competitive advantage
on them in anoxic environments that are limited in
xed nitrogen.
IV. Habitats of Purple Bacteria
A. Purple Sulfur Bacteria
A detailed description of the major habitats of purple
bacteria including a wealth of specifi c examples can
be found in the reviews of Madigan (1988), Pfennig
(1967, 1978a, 1989), and van Gemerden and Mas
Large masses (blooms) of purple sulfur bacteria
often develop in sulfi dic aquatic ecosystems exposed
to light. Although blooms of phototrophic sulfur
bacteria may occur in shallow lagoons polluted by
sewage (which triggers the activities of sulfate-re-
ducing bacteria), densely stratifi ed ‘plates’ of purple
bacteria form only in the deep waters of lakes pro-
tected from excessive wind mixing and which contain
suffi cient sulfate to support sulfate reduction in the
1. Blooms in Stratified Lakes
Intense microbial activity occurs in the sediments of
productive stratifi ed lakes. Organic material reaching
the bottom waters is catabolized by fermentation,
which releases a variety of reduced organic products,
including lactate, ethanol, and fatty acids. In fresh-
water lakes containing low levels of sulfate, these
fermentation products can be photoassimilated by
purple nonsulfur bacteria or converted to methane
by the cooperative interactions of syntrophic bacteria
and methanogenic Archaea. Alternatively, if electron
acceptors such as Fe3+ or NO3
are available, the
fermentation products will fuel anaerobic respira-
tions supported by these electron acceptors before
extensive occurs.
If sulfate is present, sulfate-reducing bacteria
8Michael T. Madigan and Deborah O. Jung
will be active in the sediments forming sulfi de; the
sulfi de diffuses upwards from the sediments into the
water column forming a gradient. Sulfi de triggers the
growth of purple sulfur bacteria, which develop in
specifi c zones of the water column where light and
sulfi de are optimal (Pfennig, 1967, 1975, 1978a).
If cell numbers are suffi ciently high, the lake water
itself will become pigmented red, purple, or reddish-
brown (Pfennig 1978a, 1989; Overmann et al., 1994,
1996, 1999). When this occurs, it is often possible to
identify the major genera of purple bacteria present
by simple microscopic examination. In many strati-
ed lakes the bloom of purple bacteria consists of a
mixture of species (Caldwell and Tiedje, 1975a,b),
while in others, the bloom may contain only a single
species (Overmann et al., 1994, 1996, 1999).
A nice example of the layering of phototrophic
purple bacteria in stratifi ed lakes can be found in
the work of Caldwell and Tiedje (1975a,b). These
workers examined water samples collected at 1 m
intervals from two eutrophic lakes Wintergreen
and Burke — located in southwest Michigan (USA).
In these studies, done before the days of molecular
microbial ecology, the purple sulfur bacteria could
be adequately identifi ed by their characteristic mor-
phologies. Both lakes contained species of Thiopedia,
Thiospirillum, Thiocystis, and Chromatium. However,
in Burke Lake the Thiospirillum population domi-
nated while in Wintergreen Lake, the Thiopedia popu-
lation dominated. Although physiochemical profi les
of the two lakes were not performed, the dominant
population in each case was likely selected by the
major characteristics — light, sulfi de, pH, dissolved
organic carbon, and the like — that defi ned each lake
(Caldwell and Tiedje, 1975a,b).
Both Burke and Wintergreen lakes also contained
green sulfur bacteria in the waters beneath the
purple sulfur bacteria. The green bacterial popula-
tion contained phototrophic consortia (Overmann
and Schubert, 2002) such as ‘Chlorochromatium’
(Caldwell and Tiedje, 1975a,b). Green bacteria can
outcompete purple bacteria at low light intensities
because they possess large antenna pigment struc-
tures called chlorosomes (Kimble and Madigan,
2002; Frigaard and Bryant, 2004). Green bacteria
also use different regions of the spectrum than do
purple bacteria and are typically much more sulfi de
tolerant. Thus, green bacteria can exist beneath a
layer of purple bacteria in a water column, and this
pattern is common in stratifi ed lakes (Pfennig, 1967,
1975, 1978a, 1989).
In hypersulfi dic shallow lakes, such as those in the
karstic Banyoles area of northern Spain, millimolar
levels of sulfi de are present and phototrophic sulfur
bacteria bloom throughout the water column. In Lake
Cisó, the best studied of these lakes, the entire water
column is anoxic, and the lake turns bright red during
an active bloom (Guerrero et al., 1985). Both green
and purple sulfur bacteria are present in Lake Cisó
but the lake is dominated by a Chromatium (probably
Allochromatium) species during periods of the most
extensive bloom.
2. Microbial Mats
Purple sulfur bacteria are also common in microbial
mats, including mats that form in marine or hyper-
saline environments (van Gemerden and Mas, 1995)
and in the effl uents of thermal springs (Castenholz
and Pierson, 1995). Microbial mats are laminated
organo-sedimentary structures composed primar-
ily of fi lamentous cyanobacteria and anoxygenic
phototrophs, such as Chlorofl exus, but often contain
purple bacteria as well. As new growth occurs from
the top of the mat, the lower mat layers decompose
and sulfate-reduction typically occurs. This supplies
the sulfi de necessary to trigger growth of purple
bacteria, usually purple sulfur bacteria. Mat thick-
ness can vary considerably. In siliceous alkaline hot
spring microbial mats, mats can be 4–5 cm thick.
Mats containing only purple bacteria, such as those of
Tch. tepidum that form in the Mammoth hot springs
of Yellowstone are much thinner, up to 0.5 cm in
thickness (Ward et al., 1989).
Thiocapsa and Allochromatium species are com-
mon inhabitants of marine microbial mats. These
purple sulfur bacteria often form a dense pigmented
layer between the cyanobacteria and the lower layers
of the mat. In this niche purple bacteria oxidize sulfi de
that diffuses upwards from below before it reaches
the cyanobacterial layers (van Gemerden and Mas,
1995). Thiocapsa roseopersicina, in particular, is
very common in marine mats, probably because of
its metabolic versatility. Besides its photoautotrophic
and photoheterotrophic capacities, this purple sulfur
bacterium can grow in darkness by heterotrophic and
chemolithotrophic means (Kondratieva et al., 1976).
This versatility allows Thiocapsa roseopersicina to
take full advantage of the variable growth conditions
that characterize different layers of microbial mats
(van Gemerden and Mas, 1995).
Chapter 1 Overview of Purple Bacteria
B. Purple Nonsulfur Bacteria
Purple nonsulfur bacteria occasionally form dense
blooms in habitats where levels of sulfi de are either
low or undetectable. Purple nonsulfur bacteria are
usually present in only low numbers in blooms of
purple sulfur bacteria, probably because of their
sulfi de sensitivity. Instead of photoautotrophy, purple
nonsulfur bacteria specialize in photoheterotrophy.
Although this puts them in competition with hetero-
trophs for organic compounds, photoheterotrophic ca-
pacity likely confers a signifi cant selective advantage
on purple nonsulfur bacteria. This is because unlike
heterotrophs, phototrophs do not need to conserve
energy from the carbon sources they photoassimilate;
carbon goes almost quantitatively into cell material.
However, no known purple nonsulfur bacteria can
hydrolyze major polymeric substances such as cel-
lulose or starch, and so ultimately, the phototrophs
depend on the heterotrophs to generate the low-
molecular-weight compounds they photoassimilate
(Pfennig, 1978a).
1. Sewage
Purple nonsulfur bacteria are present in sewage (Holm
and Vennes 1970; Siefert et al., 1978). In a detailed
study by Siefert et al. (1978), it was shown that the
mean number of purple nonsulfur bacteria in a sew-
age plant in Göttingen, Germany was highest in the
activated sludge stage of the treatment process; counts
uctuated between 105 and 106 cells ml–1 but were
never greater than 106 cells ml–1 (as measured using
plate counting techniques). Purple sulfur bacteria,
on the other hand, were quantitatively insignifi cant
in sewage and were detectable by culture only from
activated sludge (~103 cells ml–1).
A variety of purple nonsulfur bacteria were identi-
ed in the sewage plant, including Rba. sphaeroides
and Rba. capsulatus,Rps. palustris and Rps. (now
Blastochloris)viridis,Rhodocyclus (now Rubrivivax)
gelatinosus and Rhodocyclus (Rcy.) tenuis and Rsp.
photometricum.Rba. sphaeroides,Rubrivivax gela-
tinosus,Rps. palustris, and Rba. capsulatus made up
the bulk of the purple bacteria present. Despite these
relatively high numbers, it was concluded that pur ple
nonsulfur bacteria probably played only a minor role
in organic matter transformations in sewage compared
with heterotrophic bacteria, which were present at
108 to 109 cells ml–1. Purple nonsulfur bacteria were
also detectable in the strictly anaerobic (and dark)
sewage sludge digestor, but these likely represented
only transient cells traveling through the system
(Siefert et al., 1978).
2. Purple Nonsulfur Bacteria in Waste
Waste lagoons offer excellent conditions for growth
of purple nonsulfur bacteria (Jones, 1956; Cooper
et al., 1975; Kobayashi, 1975). For example, a
pigmented bloom of purple nonsulfur bacteria was
reported from the waste lagoon of a vegetable canning
plant in Minnesota (USA); prolifi c growth leading
to intensely red-colored lagoons occurred and the
bloom was associated with a signifi cant reduction in
odor (Cooper et al., 1975). Rba. sphaeroides,Rba.
capsulatus, and Rps. palustris were the key species
in this bloom, and it is likely that their consumption
of volatile fatty acids produced by fermentation led
to the odor reduction observed.
The morphologically and phylogenetically unique
purple nonsulfur bacterium Rcy. purpureus, iso-
lated by Norbert Pfennig over 30 years ago, was the
dominant phototroph in a swine waste lagoon in Iowa
(USA) (Pfennig, 1978b). This organism, of which
only a single strain has ever been isolated, probably
thrived on the combination of organic constituents
present in the waste materials. However, it is of interest
that Rcy. purpureus, one of the only purple nonsulfur
bacteria to lack a nitrogenase system (Madigan et al.,
1984; Madigan, 1995), was the dominant purple bac-
terium in this particular habitat and that it has never
been reported from elsewhere. One would expect a
swine waste lagoon to be high in amines and thus
that nitrogen fi xation would be unnecessary. It is thus
possible that Rcy. purpureus is somehow selected for
in otherwise suitable habitats for purple nonsulfur
bacteria that are very high in ammonia and volatile
amines. Since Rcy. purpureus is easily cultured, an
enrichment study of its distribution in nature using
media containing elevated levels of ammonia and
amines could yield insight on its ecology.
V. Purple Bacteria in Extreme
Purple bacteria have been isolated from extreme
environments, including hot, cold, acidic, alkaline,
and hypersaline (Madigan, 2003). Unfortunately, with
a few exceptions, these inherently interesting ‘ ex-
10 Michael T. Madigan and Deborah O. Jung
tremophilic’ purple bacteria have been little utilized
in the study of photosynthesis thus far. However, the
success of these unusual purple bacteria in their harsh
habitats implies that they have evolved important
solutions to photosynthesis under stress conditions.
We can therefore lear n much from studying them. For
example, molecular adaptations linked to photosyn-
thesis under extreme conditions should be relatively
easy to identify in extremophilic purple bacteria by
applying a bioinformatics/structural biology approach
to their genomes.
A. Thermophilic Purple Bacteria
The rst extremophilic purple bacteria were discov-
ered in the 1960s and were either halophiles or acido-
philes, including extremely halophilic species of the
genus Ectothiorhodospira. Into the late 1970s, several
new halophilic and haloalkaliphilic purple bacteria
were discovered. In the 1980s, the fi rst thermophilic
purple bacterium was isolated, Tch. tepidum. Since
then, a large diversity of alkaliphilic and halophilic
purple bacteria has been isolated. Psychrophilic
phototrophs have been described only very recently,
with two representatives currently in culture.
1. Thermochromatium tepidum
Purple bacteria were fi rst identifi ed in Yellowstone
microbial mats over 30 years ago (Castenholz, 1977).
But it was not until the 1980s that the purple sulfur
bacterium Thermochromatium (originally Chroma-
tium) tepidum was isolated in pure culture (Madigan,
1984, 1986). Tch. tepidum (Fig. 1a) is thermophilic
(optimumtemperature ~50 ºC, maximum temperature
57 ºC) and produces a novel light-harvesting (LH) 1
photopigment complex that absorbs maximally near
920 nm (Garcia et al., 1986; Nozawa et al., 1986).
The Tch. tepidum LH1 (core) antenna complex has
been studied in connection with the mechanism of
energy transfer to the reaction center. A biophysical
conundrum exists with this photocomplex in that its
absorption maximum is 50 nm to the red of that of
the reaction center. Nevertheless, because there is a
small overlap between spectra of the two components,
effi cient energy transfer occurs from the Tch. tepidum
LH1 complex to the reaction center (Kramer and
Amesz, 1996). Examples of long-wavelength-absorb-
ing core antenna complexes even more spectacular
than that of Tch. tepidum have been discovered,
indicating that in purple bacteria, LH1 complexes
that absorb very far to the red (963 nm) can still
transfer energy to the reaction center (Permentier
et al., 2001).
The photosynthetic reaction center of Tch. tepidum
is similar in most respects to that of other purple
bacteria, except for its increased thermal stability
(Nozawa and Madigan, 1991). To probe the mecha-
nism behind this, the Tch. tepidum reaction center
was crystallized. From this work, key substitutions
were identifi ed in the L and M subunits of the Tch.
tepidum reaction center that are likely responsible for
the thermostability of this photocomplex (Nogi et al.,
2000). In addition to thermal stable photocomplexes,
a thermophilic ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (a
key enzyme of the Calvin cycle) of the green plant
type was characterized from Tch. tepidum and shown
to be stable to at least 60 ºC (Heda and Madigan,
1988. 1989).
2. Other Thermophilic Purple Bacteria
Other mildly thermophilic purple bacteria (optimum
growth temperature ~40 ºC) have been cultured
from hot spring microbial mats. These include the
BChl b-containing species Rhodopseudomonas sp.
strain GI, isolated from a New Mexico hot spring
(Resnick and Madigan, 1989), and Rps. cryptolactis
(Statwald-Demchick et al., 1990) and Rsp. centenum
(Rhodocista centenaria) (Favinger et al., 1989), both
isolated from a Thermopolis (Wyoming, USA) hot
spring. Rhodocista centenaria in particular has been
useful as a model organism for biochemical/genetic
research on phototaxis and related issues of motil-
ity (see, for example McClain et al., 2002), and its
genome has recently been sequenced (C. E. Bauer,
personal communication).
B. Halophilic and Alkaliphilic Purple Bacteria
Several extremophilic purple bacteria are halophilic
or haloalkaliphilic (Imhoff et al., 1978, 1979). These
include purple sulfur bacteria such as Ectothio-
Marichromatium, and Thiohalocapsa, and purple
nonsulfur bacteria such as Rhodovibrio, Rhodothalas-
sium,Rhodobium,Rhodovulum, and Roseospira.
Collectively, these purple bacteria have salt optima
that range from seawater salinities to over 20% NaCl
(Imhoff, 2001). Interestingly, the Dead Sea purple
nonsulfur bacterium Rhodovibrio sodomensis shows a
distinct intermediate level salt requirement (optimum
Chapter 1 Overview of Purple Bacteria
at 8–11% NaCl) (Mack et al., 1993), which is very
near that of its habitat. Some purple sulfur bacteria
can grow in saturated salt solutions, making them the
most halophilic of all known phototrophic bacteria
(Imhoff, 2001).
In the 1990s several new purple bacteria were
isolated from low salinity soda lakes. Most of these
differed dramatically from known halophilic or halo-
alkaliphilic species in that they required little if any
NaCl for growth. These isolates are, however, strongly
alkaliphilic (pH optima near 9) and phylogenetically
distinct. These include purple nonsulfur bacteria
such as Rhodobaca (Milford et al., 2000), and purple
sulfur bacteria such as Thioalkalicoccus (Bryantseva
et al., 2000), and Thiorhodospira (Bryantseva et al.,
1999). Rhodobaca (Fig. 1b) is of particular interest
because it lacks a peripheral (LH2) antenna complex,
a rarity among purple nonsulfur bacteria (Glaeser and
Overmann, 1999), and it produces several unusual
carotenoids that render phototrophic cultures yellow
in color (Takaichi et al., 2001). Rhodobaca shows
various metabolic peculiarities as well, including an
inability to fi x N2 and to grow photoautotrophically
(Milford et al., 2000); both of these properties are
hallmarks of purple nonsulfur bacteria (Madigan,
C. Acidophilic Purple Bacteria
The list of acid-loving anoxygenic phototrophs is
short, as only two genera (three species) are known.
Rhodoblastus acidophilus (formerly Rhodopseudo-
monas acidophila) is common in mildly acidic en-
vironments, such as bogs, marshes, and acidic lakes.
In the original description of this organism, several
strains were described, some containing orange/brown
carotenoids and others purple/red carotenoids. The
strains are otherwise similar, and all show a lower
limit for growth near pH 4 (Pfennig, 1969). A very
similar organism is the species Rhodoblastus sphag-
nolica (Kulichevskaya et al., 2006).
Rhodopila globiformis was isolated from acidic
warm sulfi de springs (pH 3.5–4) that fl ow out along
the Gibbon River in Yellowstone National Park (Pfen-
nig, 1974). Rhodpila globiformis-like organisms have
also been obtained from springs that feed into Nymph
Lake, a warm, acidic and sulfi dic lake adjacent to the
Gibbon River; the pH of the Nymph Lake springs is 3
(Madigan, 2003). Rhodopila globiformis has a low pH
optimum for growth similar to that of Rhodoblastus
species, but, if carefully tested, would likely be more
acid tolerant than Rhodoblastus species because of the
more strongly acidic nature of its habitat. Phylogeneti-
cally, Rhodopila and Rhodoblastus are quite distinct.
No acidophilic purple sulfur bacteria are known and
this is likely because at acid pH, sulfi de would exist
exclusively as H2S, its most toxic form.
D. Purple Bacteria from Permanently Cold
Permanently cold environments are habitats for
cold-active purple bacteria (Burke and Burton,
1988; Madigan, 1998). The Madigan laboratory
has been studying phototrophs that inhabit lakes in
the McMurdo Dry Valleys of Antarctica. These are
closed basin lakes with a biology that is exclusively
microbial, and they remain permanently frozen with
ice covers of 4–7 m. Purple nonsulfur bacteria have
been isolated from samples of microbial mats that
develop along the edge of the lakes as well as from
water under the ice. Molecular studies using pufM
as a measure of the biodiversity of purple bacteria
suggest that species related to known purple nonsulfur
bacteria reside in these lakes (Karr et al., 2003).
The purple bacterium Rhodoferax antarcticus
inhabits both microbial mats and the water column
of Lake Fryxell (77º S latitude), a lake supporting
major sulfur cycling activities (Sattley and Madigan,
2006). Lake Fryxell is unmixed and weakly stratifi ed,
with saline bottom waters overlain by freshwater. A
gradient of sulfi de is present in Lake Fryxell from
micromolar levels at a depth of 9 m to nearly 1.5
millimolar near the sediments (~18 m). Despite these
nearly perfect conditions for the development of
phototrophic sulfur bacteria, no evidence for purple
sulfur bacteria has emerged from enrichment culture
or nucleic acid probing studies using pufM (Achen-
bach et al., 2001; Karr et al., 2003). Instead, Rfx.
antarcticus, a very sulfi de tolerant purple nonsulfur
bacterium (Jung et al., 2004), seems to dominate
anoxygenic photosynthesis in Lake Fryxell.
Although Rfx. antarcticus is not strongly psychro-
philic (optimal growth occurs at 18 ºC and no growth
occurs above 24 ºC), it is the fi rst anoxygenic photo-
troph to show a distinct cold adaptation and growth at
0 ºC (Madigan et al., 2000). Also in the water column
of Lake Fryxell, gas vesiculate purple nonsulfur
bacteria are present, including a morphologically
unique strain of Rfx. antarcticus (betaproteobacteria)
and a rod-shaped organism related to Rhodobacter
species (alphaproteobacteria). These gas vesiculate
12 Michael T. Madigan and Deborah O. Jung
purple bacteria position themselves in zones of the
water column where photosynthesis can occur opti-
mally (Karr et al. 2003; Jung et al., 2004). Biomass
measurements have shown that they localize in the
water column at a depth of 10 m and that cell numbers
drop off sharply below this depth and are undetectable
above this depth (Madigan, unpublished).
E. Environmental Limits to Photosynthesis in
Purple Bacteria
Work with extremophilic purple bacteria has given a
good indication of the limits to which photosynthesis
can be pushed. Photosynthesis in purple bacteria can
occur at temperatures up to at least 57 ºC and down
to 0 ºC, pH values as low as 3 or as high as 11, and
at salinities up to and including saturated solutions
of NaCl (~32%). Although these are probably not the
absolute physiochemical limits to photosynthesis in
anoxygenic phototrophs, they are likely to be very
close to the limits. It is notable that the green non-
sulfur bacterium Chlorofl exus aurantiacus, which
contains a purple bacterial-type photosynthetic re-
action center (Achenbach et al., 2001), can grow up
to 70 °C (Castenholz and Pierson, 1995). This holds
out hope that purple bacteria capable of growth at
temperatures above 57 °C (the upper limit for Tch.
tepidum, Madigan, 1986) may exist in nature. Fur-
ther exploration for new purple bacteria in sulfi dic
hot springs with temperatures above 60 °C should
answer this question.
VI. Final Remarks
Our understanding of purple bacteria goes far beyond
what has been discussed here. Through the years
purple bacteria have become increasingly important
as research tools for the study of basic problems in
photosynthesis and have contributed in major ways
to our understanding of the biochemistry, genetics
and evolution of photosynthesis. And impor tantly, the
beautiful colors and metabolic versatility of purple
bacteria continue to attract talented young people to
the fi eld. The reader will see the fruits of their labors
as well as those of the more seasoned investigators in
the following chapters where the biology of purple
bacteria will unfold in a spectacular way.
Research in the Madigan laboratory is supported by
the United States National Science Foundation, most
recently by grant MCB0237576. MTM thanks all of
his former students and postdoctoral colleagues who
did research on purple bacteria in his laboratory.
These include Rich Masters, Rick Stegeman, Glenn
Wright, Carletta Ooten, Erin Mack, Joseph Mayers,
Ghanshyam Heda,Vasiliki Karayiannis, Sol Resnick,
Chad Rubin, Gerrit Hoogewerf, Ike Pantazopoulous,
Amy Milford, Linda Kimble, Amy Stevenson, Terry
Locke, Tiffany Full, Jen Carey, Elizabeth Karr, Jill
Crespi, Mahmoud Tayah, Tom Wahlund, Matt Sattley,
and Marie Asao.
Achenbach LA, Carey JR and Madigan MT (2001) Photosyn-
thetic and phylogenetic primers for detection of anoxygenic
phototrophs in natural environments. Appl Environ Microbiol
67: 2922–2926
Biebl H and Pfennig N (1981) Isolation of members of the family
Rhodospirillaceae. In: Starr MP, Stolp H, Trüper HG, Balows
A and Schlegel HG (eds) The Prokaryotes— a Handbook on
Habitats, Isolation and Identifi cation of Bacteria, pp 267–273.
Springer-Verlag, New York
Blankenship RE, Madigan MT and Bauer CE (1995) Anoxygenic
Photosynthetic Bacteria (Advances in Photosynthesis and Res-
piration, Vol 2). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Brune DC (1995) Sulfur compounds as photosynthetic electron
donors. In: Blankenship RE, Madigan MT and Bauer CE (eds)
Anoxygenic Photosynthetic Bacteria (Advances in Photosyn-
thesis and Respiration, Vol 2), pp 847–870. Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht
Bryantseva IA, Gorlenko VM, Kompantseva EI and Imhoff JF
(2000) Thioalkalicococcus limnaeus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new
alkaliphilic purple sulfur bacterium with bacteriochlorophyll b.
Int J Syst Bacteriol 50: 2157–2163
Bryantseva IA, Gorlenko VM, Kompantseva EI, Imhoff JF, Sül-
ing J and Mityushina L (1999) Thiorhodospira sibirica gen.
nov., sp. nov., a new alkaliphilic purple sulfur bacterium from
a Siberian soda lake. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49: 697–703
Burke CM and Burton HR (1988) Photosynthetic bacteria in
meromictic lakes and stratifi ed fjords of the Vestfold Hills,
Antarctica. Hydrobiologia 165: 13–23
Caldwell DE and Tiedje JM (1975a) A morphological study of
anaerobic bacteria from the hypolimnia of two Michigan lakes.
Can J Microbiol 21: 362–376
Caldwell DE and Tiedje JM (1975b) The structure of anaerobic
bacterial communities in the hypolimnia of several Michigan
lakes. Can J Microbiol 21: 377–385
Castenholz RW (1977) The effect of sulfi de on the blue-green
algae of hot springs II. Yellowstone National Park. Microbial
Ecology 3: 79–105
Castenholz RW and Pierson BK (1995) Ecology of thermophilic
Chapter 1 Overview of Purple Bacteria
anoxygenic phototrophs. In: Blankenship RE, Madigan MT and
Bauer CE (eds) Anoxygenic Phototrophic Bacteria, pp 87–103.
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Cohen-Bazire G, Sistrom WR and Stanier RY (1957) Kinetic
studies of pigment synthesis by non-sulfur purple bacteria. J
Cell Comp Physiol 49: 25–68
Cooper DE, Rands MB and Woo C-P (1975) Sulfi de reduction in
fellmongery effl uent by red sulfur bacteria. J Water Pollution
Control Fed 47: 2088–2100
Czeczuga B (1968) Primary production of the purple sulphuric
bacteria, Thiopedia rosea Winogr. (Thiorhodaceae). Photo-
synthetica 2: 161–166
Ehrenreich A and Widdel F (1994) Anaerobic oxidation of ferrous
iron by purple bacteria, a new type of phototrophic metabolism.
Appl Environ Microbiol 60: 4517–4526
Favinger J, Stadtwald R and Gest H (1989) Rhodospirillum cente-
num, sp. nov., a thermotolerant cyst-forming anoxygenic photo-
synthetic bacterium. Ant van Leeuwenhoek 55: 291–296
Frigaard NU and Bryant DA (2004) Seeing green bacteria in a
new light: Genomics-enabled studies of the photosynthetic
apparatus in green sulfur bacteria and fi lamentous anoxygenic
phototrophic bacteria. Arch Microbiol 182: 265–276
Garcia D, Parot P, Verméglio A and Madigan MT (1986) The
light-harvesting complexes of a thermophilic purple sulfur
photosynthetic bacterium Chromatium tepidum. Biochim
Biophys Acta 850: 390–395
Gibson J and Harwood CS (1995) Degradation of aromatic
compounds by nonsulfur purple bacteria. In: Blankenship RE,
Madigan MT and Bauer CE (eds) Anoxygenic Photosynthetic
Bacteria (Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration, Vol 2),
pp 991–1003. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Glaeser J and Overmann J (1999) Selective enrichment and char-
acterization of Roseospirillum parvum, gen. nov. and sp. nov., a
new purple nonsulfur bacterium with unusual light absorption
properties. Arch Microbiol 171: 405–416
Griffi n BM, Schott J and Schink B (2007) Nitrite, an electron
donor for anoxygenic photosynthesis. Science 316: 1870
Guerrero R, Montesinos E, Pedrós-Alió C, Esteve I, Mas J, van
Gemerden H, Hofman PAG and Bakker JF (1985) Phototrophic
sulfur bacteria in two Spanish lakes: Vertical distribution and
limiting factors. Limnol Oceanogr 30: 919–931
Gurgen V, Kirchner G and Pfennig N (1976) Fermentation of
pyruvate by 7 species of phototrophic purple bacteria. Z Allg
Mikrobiolo 16: 573–586
Hansen TA and van Gemerden H (1972) Sulfi de utilization by
purple nonsulfur bacteria. Arch Mikrobiol 86: 49–56
Hansen TA and Veldkamp H (1973) Rhodopseudomonas sul-
dophila, nov. spec., a new species of the purple nonsulfur
bacteria. Arch Mikrobiol 92: 45–58
Heda GD and Madigan MT (1988) Thermal properties and
oxygenase activity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase
from the thermophilic purple bacterium, Chromatium tepidum.
FEMS Microbiol Lett 51: 45–50
Heda GD and Madigan MT (1989) Purifi cation and characteriza-
tion of the thermostable ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/
oxygenase from the thermophilic purple bacterium Chromatium
tepidum. Eur J Biochem 184: 313–319
Holm HW and Vennes JW (1970) Occurrence of purple sulfur
bacteria in a sewage treatment lagoon. Appl Microbiol 19:
Imhoff JF (2001) True marine and halophilic anoxygenic photo-
trophic bacteria. Arch Microbiol 176: 243–254
Imhoff JF and Madigan MT (2004) International Committee on
Systematics of Prokaryotes Subcommitteee on the taxonomy of
phototrophic bacteria. Minutes of the meetings, 27 August 2003,
Tokyo, Japan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54: 1001–1003
Imhoff JF, Hashwa F and Trüper HG (1978) Isolation of extremely
halophilic phototrophic bacteria from the alkaline Wadi Natr un,
Egypt. Arch Hydrobiol 84: 381–388
Imhoff JF, Sahl HG, Soliman GSH and Trüper HG (1979) The
Wadi Natrun: chemical composition and microbial mass
developments in alkaline brines of eutrophic desert lakes.
Geomicrobiol J 1: 219–234
Imhoff JF, Hiraishi A and Süling J (2005) Anoxygenic phototrophic
bacteria. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR and Staley JT (eds) Bergey’s
Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd ed, Vol 2, part A, pp
119–132. Springer, New York
Jones BR (1956) Studies of pigmented non-sulfur purple bacteria
in relation to cannery waste lagoon odors. Sewage Ind Wastes
28: 883–893
Jung DO, Achenbach LA, Karr EA, Takaichi S and Madigan
MT (2004) A gas vesiculate planktonic strain of the purple
non-sulfur bacterium Rhodoferax antarcticus isolated from
Lake Fryxell, Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Arch Microbiol 182:
Kämpf C and Pfennig N (1980) Capacity of Chromatiaceae for
chemotrophic growth. Specifi c respiration rates of Thiocystis
violacea and Chromatium vinosum. Arch Microbiol 127:
Karr EL, Sattley WM, Jung DO, Madigan MT and Achenbach LA
(2003) Remarkable diversity of phototrophic purple bacteria in
a permanently frozen Antarctic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol
69: 4910–4914
Kimble-Long LK and Madigan MT (2002) Irradiance effects
on growth and bacteriochlorophyll content of phototrophic
heliobacteria, purple and green photosynthetic bacteria. Pho-
tosynthetica 40: 629-632
Kobayashi M (1975) Role of photosynthetic bacteria in foul water
purifi cation. Prog Water Technol 7: 309–315
Kondratieva EN, Zhukov VG, Ivanovsky RN, Petushkova YP
and Monosov EZ (1976) The capacity of phototrophic sulfur
bacterium Thiocapsa roseopersicina for chemosynthesis. Arch
Microbiol 108: 287–292
Kramer H and Amesz J (1996) Antenna organization in the pur ple
sulfur bacteria Chromatium tepidum and Chromatium vinosum.
Photosynth Res 49: 237–244
Kulichevskaya IS, Guzev VS, Gorlenko VM, Liesack W and
Dedysh SN (2006) Rhodoblastus sphagnicola sp. nov., a novel
acidophilic purple non-sulfur bacterium from Sphagnum peat
bog. Intl J Syst Evol Microbiol 56: 1397–1402
Mack EE, Mandelco L, Woese CR and Madigan MT (1993)
Rhodospirillum sodomense, sp. nov., a Dead Sea Rhodospiril-
lum species. Arch Microbiol 160: 363–371
Madigan MT (1984) A novel photosynthetic purple bacterium iso-
lated from a Yellowstone hot spring. Science 225: 313–315
Madigan MT (1986) Chromatium tepidum sp. nov., a thermophilic
photosynthetic bacterium of the family Chromatiaceae. Int J
Syst Bacteriol 36: 222–227
Madigan MT (1988) Microbiology, physiology, and ecology
of phototrophic bacteria. In: AJB Zehnder (ed) Biology of
Anaerobic Microorganisms, pp 39–111, John Wiley & Sons,
New York
14 Michael T. Madigan and Deborah O. Jung
Madigan MT (1995) Microbiology of nitrogen fi xation by anoxy-
genic photosynthetic bacteria. In: Blankenship RE, Madigan
MT and Bauer CE (eds) Anoxygenic Photosynthetic Bacteria
(Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration, Vol 2), pp
915–928. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Madigan MT (1998) Isolation and characterization of psychrophil-
ic purple bacteria from Antarctica. In: Peschek GA, Löffelhardt
W and Schmetterer G (eds) The Phototrophic Prokaryotes, pp
699–706. Plenum, New York
Madigan MT (2003) Anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria from
extreme environments. Photosynth Res 76: 157–171
Madigan MT and Gest H (1978) Growth of a photosynthetic
bacterium anaerobically in darkness, supported by ‘oxidant-de-
pendent’ sugar fermentation. Arch Microbiol 117: 119–122
Madigan MT and Gest H (1979) Growth of the photosynthetic
bacterium Rhodopseudomonas capsulata chemoautotrophi-
cally in darkness with H2 as the energy source. J Bacteriol
137: 524–530
Madigan MT, Cox SS and Stegeman RA (1984) Nitrogen fi xation
and nitrogenase activities in members of the family Rhodospi-
rillaceae. J Bacteriol 157: 73–78
Madigan MT, Jung DO, Woese CR and Achenbach LA (2000)
Rhodoferax antarcticus sp. nov., a moderately psychrophilic
purple nonsulfur bacterium isolated from an Antarctic microbial
mat. Arch. Microbiol. 173: 269–277
McClain J, Rollo DR, Rushing BG and Bauer CE (2002) Rho-
dospirillum centenum utilizes separate motor and switch
components to control lateral and polar fl agellum rotation. J
Bacteriol 184: 2429–2438
Milford AD, Achenbach LA, Jung DO and Madigan MT (2000)
Rhodobaca bogoriensis gen. nov. and sp. nov., an alkaphilic
purple nonsulfur bacterium from African Rift Valley soda lakes.
Arch Microbiol 174: 18–27
Nagashima KVP, Hiraishi A, Shimada K and Matsuura K (1997)
Horizontal transfer of genes coding for the photosynthetic reac-
tion centers of purple bacteria. J Mol Evol 45: 131–136
Nogi T, Fathir I, Kobayashi M, Nozawa T and Miki K (2000)
Crystal structures of photosynthetic reaction center and high-
potential iron-sulfur protein from Thermochromatium tepidum:
Thermostability and electron transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
97: 13561–13566
Nozawa T and Madigan MT (1991) Temperature and solvent
effects on reaction centers from Chlorofl exus aurantiacus and
Chromatium tepidum. J Biochem 110: 588–594
Nozawa T, Fukada T, Hatano M and Madigan MT (1986) Organi-
zation of intracytoplasmic membranes in a novel thermophilic
purple photosynthetic bacterium as revealed from absorption,
circular dichroism, and emission spectra. Biochim Biophys
Acta 852: 191–197
Overmann J and Schubert K (2002) Phototrophic consortia: Model
systems for symbiotic interrelations between prokaryotes. Arch
Microbiol 177: 201–208
Overmann J, Beatty JT and Hall KJ (1994) Photosynthetic activ-
ity and population dynamics of Amoebobacter purpureus in a
meromictic saline lake. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 15: 309–320
Overmann J, Beatty JT and Hall KJ (1996) Purple sulfur bacteria
control the growth of aerobic heterotrophic bacterioplank-
ton in a meromictic salt lake. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:
Overmann J, Hall KJ, Nor thcote TG and Beatty JT (1999) Grazing
of the copepod Diaptomus connexus on purple sulphur bacteria
in a meromictic salt lake. Environ Microbiol 1: 213–221
Pattaragulwanit K, Brune DC, Trüper HG and Dahl C (1998)
Molecular genetic evidence for extracytoplasmic localization
of sulfur globules in Chromatium vinosum. Arch Microbiol
169: 434–444
Permentier HP, Neerken S, Overmann J and Amesz J (2001) A
bacteriochlorophyll a antenna complex from purple bacteria
absorbing at 963 nm. Biochemistry 40: 5573–5578
Pfennig N (1967) Photosynthetic bacteria. Ann Rev Microbiol
21: 285–324
Pfennig N (1969) Rhodopseudomonas acidophila, sp. n., a new
species of the budding purple nonsulfur bacteria. J Bacteriol
99: 597–602
Pfennig N (1974) Rhodopseudomonas globiformis, sp. n., a
new species of the Rhodospirillaceae. Arch Microbiol 100:
Pfennig N (1975) The phototrophic bacteria and their role in the
sulfur cycle. Plant Soil 43: 1–16
Pfennig N (1978a) General physiology and ecology of photo-
synthetic bacteria. In: Clayton RK and Sistrom WR (eds) The
Photosynthetic Bacteria, pp 3–18. Plenum Press, New York
Pfennig N (1978b) Rhodocyclus purpureus gen. nov. and sp.
nov., a ring-shape, vitamin B12-requiring member of the family
Rhodospirillaceae. Int J Syst Bacteriol 28: 283–288
Pfennig N (1989) Ecology of phototrophic purple and green sulfur
bacteria. In: Schlegel HG and Bowien B (eds) Autotrophic
Bacteria, pp 97–116. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
Raymond J, Zhaxybayeva O, Gogarten JP and Blankenship RE
(2003) Evolution of photosynthetic prokaryotes: A maximum-
likelihood mapping approach. Phil Tran Roy Soc Lond B Biol
Sci 358: 223–230
Resnick SM and Madigan MT (1989) Isolation and character-
ization of a mildly thermophilic nonsulfur purple bacterium
containing bacteriochlorophyll b. FEMS Microbiol Lett 65:
Satoh T, Hoshino Y and Kitamura H (1976) Rhodopseudomonas
sphaeroides forma sp. denitrifi cans, a denitrifying strain as a
subspecies of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. Arch Microbiol
108: 265–269
Sattley WM and Madigan MT (2006) Isolation, characterization
and ecology of cold-active, chemolithotrophic sulfur-oxidizing
bacteria from perennially ice-covered Lake Fryxell, Antarctica.
Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 5562–5568
Schultz JE and Weaver PF (1982) Fermentation and anaerobic
respiration by Rhodospirillum rubrum and Rhodopseudomonas
capsulata. J Bacteriol 149: 181–190
Siefert E and Koppenhagen VB (1982) Studies on the vitamin B12
auxotrophy of Rhodocyclus purpureus and two other vitamin
B12-requiring purple nonsulfur bacteria. Arch Microbiol 132:
Siefert E, Irgens RL and Pfennig N (1978) Phototrophic purple
and green bacteria in a sewage treatment plant. Appl Environ
Microbiol 35: 38–44
Sojka GA (1978) Metabolism of nonaromatic organic compounds.
In: Clayton RK and Sistrom WR (eds) The Photosynthetic
Bacteria, pp 707–718. Plenum Press, New York
Stadtwald-Demchick R, Turner FR and Gest H (1990) Rhodop-
seudomonas cryptolactis, sp. nov., a new thermotolerant species
of budding phototrophic purple bacteria. FEMS Microbiol
Lett 71: 117–121
Tabita FR (1995) The biochemistry and metabolic regulation of
Chapter 1 Overview of Purple Bacteria
carbon metabolism and CO2 xation in purple bacteria. In:
Blankenship RE, Madigan MT and Bauer CE (eds) Anoxygenic
Photosynthetic Bacteria (Advances in Photosynthesis and
Respiration, Vol 2), pp 885–914. Kluwer Academic Publish-
ers, Dordrecht
Takahashi M and Ichimura S (1968) Vertical distribution and
organic matter production of photosynthetic sulfur bacteria in
Japanese lakes. Limnol Oceanog 13: 644–655
Takaichi S, Jung DO and Madigan MT (2001) Accumulation
of unusual carotenoids in the spheroidene pathway, demeth-
ylspheroidene and demethylspheroidenone, in an alkaliphilic
purple nonsulfur bacterium Rhodobaca bogoriensis. Photosynth
Res 67:207–214
Trüper HG (1978) Sulfur metabolism. In: Clayton RK and Sistrom
WR (eds) The Photosynthetic Bacteria, pp 677–690. Plenum
Press, New York
Trüper HG (1981) Versatility of carbon metabolism in photo-
trophic bacteria. In: Dalton H (ed) Microbial Growth on C1
Compounds, pp 116–121. Heyden, London
Trüper HG and Fischer U (1982) Anaerobic oxidation of sulphur
compounds as electron donors for bacterial photosynthesis.
Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 298: 529–542
Trüper HG and Pfennig N (1981) Characterization and identifi ca-
tion of the anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria. In: Starr MP, Stolp
H, Trüper HG, Balows A and Schlegel HG (eds.) The Prokary-
otes, a Handbook on Habitatss, Isolation, and Identifi cation of
Bacteria, pp 299–312. Springer-Verlag, New York
Uffen RL and Wolfe RS (1970) Anaerobic growth of purple
nonsulfur bacteria under dark conditions. J Bacteriol 104:
van Gemerden H (1968) On the ATP generation by Chromatium
in darkness. Arch Mikrobiol 64: 118–124
van Gemerden H and Mas J (1995) Ecology of phototrophic
sulfur bacteria. In: Blankenship RE, Madigan MT and Bauer
CE (eds) Anoxygenic Photosynthetic Bacteria (Advances in
Photosynthesis and Respiration, Vol 2), pp 50–85. Kluwer
Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
van Niel CB (1932) On the morphology and physiology of the
purple and green sulphur bacteria. Arch Mikrobiol 3: 1–112
van Niel CB (1944) The culture, general physiology, mor phology,
and classifi cation of the non-sulfur purple and brown bacteria.
Bacteriol Rev 8: 1–118
Ward DM, Weller R, Shiea J, Castenholz RW and Cohen Y
(1989) Hot spring microbial mats: anoxygenic and oxygenic
mats of possible evolutionary signifi cance. In: Cohen Y and
Rosenberg E (eds) Microbial Mats: Physiological Ecology of
Benthic Microbial Communities, pp 3–15. American Society
for Microbiology, Washington, DC
Zengler K, Heider J, Rossello-Mora R and Widdel F (1999)
Phototrophic utilization of toluene under anoxic conditions
by a new strain of Blastochloris sulfoviridis. Arch Microbiol
172: 204–212
... Rhodobacter gluconicum was detected on the cathode in rice-based PMFC [26]. Rhodobacter belongs to the purple non-sulfur anoxigenic phototrophic bacteria [163] and its role in electrogenesis is still unclear. Among the diversity of bacterial orders on the cathode uncultured bacteria were found such as Thiotrichales, Chromatiales, Legionellales, Methylococcales, and Acidithiobacillales, belonged to Gammaproteobacteria [152], including many bacterial species of purple sulfur bacteria that can oxidize sulfur compounds. ...
... Presumably, the composition of the microbial populations of the cathode operating with the soil substrate is qualitatively different than in the above-mentioned waterlogged rice field based PMFCs, both due to the influence of other plant species on the microbiome type, and owing to characteristics of the substrate and related conditions, in particular, the access of light. The purple bacteria detected in large numbers on the cathode of marshy PMFCs are photoautotrophs [163] and are not adapted to metabolism and growth in the dark. The results of Ueoka et al. [31] suggest that the cathode improvement is crucial for eliciting the maximum capacity of rhizosphere bacteria to generate bioelectricity in PMFC. ...
The article presents a study of the influence of Lemna minor population density on the bioelectric potential and current of model electro-biosystems in the laboratory сonditions using 500 and 1000 Ω resistors and in the open circuit. The positive effect of increasing the density of duckweed plants populations from 60 to 120 fronds/ml on the growth of bioelectric parameters of model electro-biosystems under load conditions and without resistors was revealed. Increasing the amount of duckweed biomass is a factor of enhancing the efficiency of electro-biosystems based on L. minor.
... The PNSB constitute a group of versatile organisms in which most exhibit four modes of metabolism: photoautotrophic, photoheterotrophic, chemoheterotrophic and chemoautotrophic, switching from one mode to another depending on conditions available ( Figure 1) (Larimer et al., 2003). This metabolic versatility allows R. palustris to use light, inorganic, and organic compounds as its carbon and energy sources under anaerobic or aerobic conditions (Madigan and Jung, 2009). Therefore, R. palustris is of interest for all sorts of industrial and environmental applications. ...
Full-text available
Rhodopseudomonas palustris , a purple nonsulfur bacterium, is a bacterium with the properties of extraordinary metabolic versatility, carbon source diversity and metabolite diversity. Due to its biodetoxification and biodegradation properties, R. palustris has been traditionally applied in wastewater treatment and bioremediation. R. palustris is rich in various metabolites, contributing to its application in agriculture, aquaculture and livestock breeding as additives. In recent years, R. palustris has been engineered as a microbial cell factory to produce valuable chemicals, especially photofermentation of hydrogen. The outstanding property of R. palustris as a microbial cell factory is its ability to use a diversity of carbon sources. R. palustris is capable of CO 2 fixation, contributing to photoautotrophic conversion of CO 2 into valuable chemicals. R. palustris can assimilate short-chain organic acids and crude glycerol from industrial and agricultural wastewater. Lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates can also be degraded by R. palustris . Utilization of these feedstocks can reduce the industry cost and is beneficial for environment. Applications of R. palustris for biopolymers and their building blocks production, and biofuels production are discussed. Afterward, some novel applications in microbial fuel cells, microbial electrosynthesis and photocatalytic synthesis are summarized. The challenges of the application of R. palustris are analyzed, and possible solutions are suggested.
... Regarding this notion, R capsulatus is competent of phototrophic anaerobic respiration, chemotrophic aerobic photosynthesis, fermentative growth, and nitrogen fixation. 6,15 Knowledge of these intrinsic microbial properties has led to innovation in biomonitoring and bioremediation for wastewater treatment, 16 developing photo bioelectrochemical cells (PBCs) 17 and biological hydrogen production system 18 as an alternative source of clean energy. In addition, R capsulatus serves as a host for the production of biopolyester polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), extracellular nucleic acids (DNA and RNA), 19 cycloartenol, lupeol, 20 and commercially important single-cell proteins. ...
Full-text available
Rhodobacter capsulatus is a purple non-sulfur bacteria widely used as a model organism to study bacterial photosynthesis. It exhibits extensive metabolic activities and demonstrates other distinctive characteristics such as pleomorphism and nitrogen-fixing capability. It can act as a gene transfer agent (GTA). The commercial importance relies on producing polyester polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), extracellular nucleic acids, and commercially critical single-cell proteins. These diverse features make the organism an exciting and environmentally and industrially important one to study. This study was aimed to characterize, model, and annotate the function of a hypothetical protein (Accession no. CAA71016.1) of R capsulatus through computational analysis. The urf7 gene encodes the protein. The tertiary structure was predicted through MODELLER and energy minimization and refinement by YASARA Energy Minimization Server and GalaxyRefine tools. Analysis of sequence similarity, evolutionary relationship, and exploration of domain, family, and superfamily inferred that the protein has S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)-dependent methyltransferase activity. This was further verified by active site prediction by CASTp server and molecular docking analysis through Autodock Vina tool and PatchDock server of the predicted tertiary structure of the protein with its ligands (SAM and SAH). Normally, as a part of the gene product of photosynthetic gene cluster (PGC), the established roles of SAM-dependent methyltransferases are bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoid biosynthesis. But the STRING database unveiled its association with NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (Complex I). The assembly and regulation of this Complex I is mediated by the gene products of the nuo operon. As a part of this operon, the urf7 gene encodes SAM-dependent methyltransferase. As a consequence of these findings, it is reasonable to propose that the hypothetical protein of interest in this study is a SAM-dependent methyltransferase associated with bacterial NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase assembly. Due to conservation of Complex I from prokaryotes to eukaryotes, R capsulatus can be a model organism of study to understand the common disorders which are linked to the dysfunctions of complex I.
Carotenoids are important photosynthetic pigments that play key roles in light harvesting and energy transfer, photoprotection, and in the folding, assembly, and stabilization of light-harvesting pigment–protein complexes. The genetically tractable purple phototrophic bacteria have been useful for investigating the biosynthesis and function of photosynthetic pigments and cofactors, including carotenoids. Here, we give an overview of the roles of carotenoids in photosynthesis and of their biosynthesis, focusing on the extensively studied purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides as a model organism. We provide detailed procedures for manipulating carotenoid biosynthesis, and for the preparation and analysis of the light-harvesting and photosynthetic reaction center complexes that bind them. Using appropriate examples from the literature, we discuss how such approaches have enhanced our understanding of the biosynthesis of carotenoids and the photosynthesis-related functions of these fascinating molecules.
PPB carotenoids are usually measured through spectrophotometric analysis, measuring total carotenoids (TCs) which has low accuracy and cannot identify individual carotenoids or isomers. Here, we developed an ultra-performance liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet and high-resolution mass spectrometry detection (UPLC-UV-HRMS) to quantify neurosporene, lycopene, and bacteriochlorophyll a contents in PPB cultures. The method exhibited satisfactory recoveries for individual pigments (between 82.1% and 99.5%) and was applied to a range of mixed PPB cultures. The use of a C30 column also enabled the detection of three different isomers of lycopene. In addition, a method for anaerobic photoheterotrophic PPB cultivation to acquire live-cell spectrophotometric information was developed and tested by modifying a standard microbial culture microplate system. A rapid, and relatively low effort principal component analysis (PCA) based decomposition of the whole-cell spectra for pigment analysis in the microplates was also developed. Analysing whole-cell spectra via PCA allowed more accurate prediction of individual pigments compared to absorption methods, and can be done non-destructively, during live-cell growth, but requires calibration for new media and microbial matrices.
Full-text available
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from hog operations contributes to noxious odors in the surrounding environment and can be life-threatening. There is, however, limited understanding of what influences H2S emissions from these farms. Emissions of H2S were measured periodically over the course of two years at hog finisher farms in humid mesothermal (North Carolina, NC, USA) and semi-arid (Oklahoma, OK, USA) climates. Emissions were determined using an inverse dispersion backward Lagrangian stochastic model in conjunction with line-sampled H2S concentrations and measured turbulence. Daily emissions at the two lagoons were characterized by low emissions on most days with occasional days of high emissions. Mean annual area-specific emissions were much lower for the NC lagoon (1.32 µg H2S m−2 s−1 ± 0.07 µg H2S m−2 s−1) than the OK lagoon (6.88 µg H2S m−2 s−1 ± 0.13 µg H2S m−2 s−1). Mean annual hog-specific emissions for the NC lagoon were 0.75 g H2S hd−1 d−1 while those for the OK lagoon were 1.92 g H2S hd−1 d−1. Emissions tended to be higher during the afternoon, likely due to higher mean winds. Daily H2S emissions from both lagoons were greatest during the first half of the year and decreased as the year progressed and a reddish color (indicating high populations of purple sulfur bacteria (PSB)) appeared in the lagoon. The generally low emissions at the NC lagoon and higher emissions at the OK lagoon were likely a result of the influence of wind on mixing the lagoon and not the presence of PSB.
Full-text available
Biological nitrogen fixation catalyzed by Mo-nitrogenase of symbiotic diazotrophs has attracted interest because its potential to supply plant-available nitrogen offers an alternative way of using chemical fertilizers for sustainable agriculture. Phototrophic purple nonsulfur bacteria (PNSB) diazotrophically grow under light anaerobic conditions and can be isolated from photic and microaerobic zones of rice fields. Therefore, PNSB as asymbiotic diazotrophs contribute to nitrogen fixation in rice fields. An attempt to measure nitrogen in the oxidized surface layer of paddy soil estimates that approximately 6–8 kg N/ha/year might be accumulated by phototrophic microorganisms. Species of PNSB possess one of or both alternative nitrogenases, V-nitrogenase and Fe-nitrogenase, which are found in asymbiotic diazotrophs, in addition to Mo-nitrogenase. The regulatory networks control nitrogenase activity in response to ammonium, molecular oxygen, and light irradiation. Laboratory and field studies have revealed effectiveness of PNSB inoculation to rice cultures on increases of nitrogen gain, plant growth, and/or grain yield. In this review, properties of the nitrogenase isozymes and regulation of nitrogenase activities in PNSB are described, and research challenges and potential of PNSB inoculation to rice cultures are discussed from a viewpoint of their applications as nitrogen biofertilizer.
Full-text available
Study region McClelland Lake, Athabasca Oil Sands Region Study focus Effective environmental monitoring requires knowledge of inherent natural variation. In the absence of pre-development monitoring of aquatic ecosystems, paleolimnological approaches have been championed as a scientifically rigorous method to define pre-development conditions. Motivated by regulatory processes and absence of pre-development data, we conducted a comprehensive paleolimnological study at McClelland Lake to determine an appropriate timeframe for defining natural ranges of variation (NRVs) in hydroecological variables before potential onset of mining within its catchment. New hydrological insights for the region During the past ∼325 years, five distinctive intervals of hydroecological conditions were identified. The first phase (ca. 1695–1750) coincided with the Little Ice Age (LIA), when arid conditions supported lake levels 2.6–3.5 m below present. Phase II (ca. 1750–1840) encompassed subsequent warming, lake-level rise to 1.2–2.6 m below present and increased aquatic productivity. Phase III included frequent natural disturbance by wildfires (ca. 1840–1900). During Phase IV (ca. 1900–1970), the lake deepened and algal communities diversified. Phase V (post–1970) captured influence of regional industrial development, climate warming and lake-level decline, and wildfires. We propose quantitative definitions of NRVs for McClelland Lake be derived from paleolimnological indicators since 1750, which provide a conservative and relevant range of hydroecological conditions, and explore merits and drawbacks of shorter-duration NRV definition for monitoring change.
NO3⁻-N and NH4⁺-N are two prevalent nitrogenous pollutants in aquaculture wastewater posing a significant health risk to aquatic animals. R. azotoformans ATCC17025 can rapidly denitrify to remove NO3⁻-N, assimilating NH4⁺-N. The study investigated the influence of ammonia assimilation on bacterial denitrification. Results revealed that low concentration of NH4⁺-N (≤ 0.3 mM) accelerated denitrification, whereas high concentration inhibited it. RT-qPCR indicated that the inhibition of NO reduction under high concentration of NH4⁺-N was the primary cause of denitrification depression, whereas low concentration of NH4⁺-N enhanced the synthesis of practically all enzymes involved in denitrification. Finally, nitrogen-rich aquaculture effluent was effectively treated in lab-scale using a semi-continuous operation that provided an appropriate NH4⁺-N concentration for denitrification. This semi-continuous operation treated wastewater 2 times faster than the batch operation and the content of nitrogen decreased to effluent standard. The study can provide guidance for nitrogen removal of aquaculture wastewater with bioaugmentation.
Anoxygenic Photosynthetic Bacteria is a comprehensive volume describing all aspects of non-oxygen-evolving photosynthetic bacteria. The 62 chapters are organized into themes of: Taxonomy, physiology and ecology; Molecular structure of pigments and cofactors; Membrane and cell wall structure: Antenna structure and function; Reaction center structure and electron/proton pathways; Cyclic electron transfer; Metabolic processes; Genetics; Regulation of gene expression, and applications. The chapters have all been written by leading experts and present in detail the current understanding of these versatile microorganisms. The book is intended for use by advanced undergraduate and graduate students and senior researchers in the areas of microbiology, genetics, biochemistry, biophysics and biotechnology.
Temperature and solvent effects on reaction center structures were examined in two thermophilic photosynthetic bacteria, ChloroHexus aurantiacus and Chromatium tepidum, in order to gain insight into the interactions among the reaction center proteins and pigment systems. Thermal stability of the reaction centers was found to be proportional to the optimum growth temperature. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra in the 250–300 nm region indicated that thermal denaturation destroyed tertiary structures (helix-to-helix interactions or amino acid residue conformation) in the native reaction center, keeping helical structures intact. Absorption and circular dichroism spectral changes showed that alcohol denatured the so-called special pair and the accessory BChl a independently. The alcohol denaturation further indicates that the coordination between BChl a and amino acid residue in the protein is one of the important interactions maintaining the pigment organization of the reaction centers.
Several anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria (“anoxyphototrophs”) have been isolated and characterized from extreme environments. These include organisms from thermal [1], hypersaline [2-6], acidic [7,8], and alkaline [2,5,6] environments. In the author’s laboratory, thermophilic species of purple and green sulfur bacteria, Chromatium tepidum [9,10] and Chlorobium tepidum [11], respectively, and of heliobacteria, Heliobacterium modesticaldum [12], have been described; all of these organisms are capable of growth above 50°C. In addition, a variety of thermotolerant nonsulfur purple bacteria have been characterized, although none of these show growth above 50°C [13-15].
My interest in soda lakes started more than 25 years ago from an encounter with a geologist colleague interested in astrobiology. At that time, the Mars exploration programme was underway and the chemical composition of the Mars regolith a matter for speculation. There are good reasons to believe that Mars and Earth may have experienced rather similar conditions after planet formation, with the development of extensive oceans. The chemical composition of the early oceans is a matter of debate – in particular, whether these were acid or alkaline (Kempe and Degens 1985; Kempe and Kazmierczak 1997). A consideration of weathering processes known to occur on Earth suggests that alkalinity is likely to arise as a consequence of an excess of Na+ over Ca2+ in basaltic minerals, resulting in a carbonate-rich and therefore alkaline aqueous environment (Mills and Sims 1995). In view of the possibility of life on Mars, there was, and is, interest in examining possible terrestrial analogues of the alkaline environment in order to inform any life-detection experimentation.
The purple nonsulfur bacteria (Rhodospirillaceae) comprise different morphological types of photo-trophic bacteria that can photoassimilate simple organic compounds under anaerobic conditions. They are also capable of chemotrophic growth under aerobic conditions, but not all species develop under full atmospheric oxygen tension. At oxygen concentrations between 0.5% and 5%, photosynthesis and oxidative metabolism may function simultaneously. Although several species would grow under aerobic conditions at rates comChapauble to those observed under anaerobic phototrophic conditions, incubation with organic substrates in the light with oxygen excluded is the only way to enrich selectively for the purple nonsulfur bacteria.
The anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria (Anoxyphoto-bacteria Gibbons and Murray 1978) perform photosynthesis with a bacteriochlorophyll (bchl) under anaerobic conditions, using reduced sulfur compounds, molecular hydrogen, or simple organic carbon compounds as electron donors. These bacteria do not use water as a photosynthetic electron donor and do not produce molecular oxygen during photosynthesis. The ability to fix molecular nitrogen occurs in nearly all species tested so far (Siefert, 1976).
Anoxic iron-rich sediment samples that had been stored in the light showed development of brown, rusty patches. Subcultures in defined mineral media with ferrous iron (10 mmol/liter, mostly precipitated as FeCO3) yielded enrichments of anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria which used ferrous iron as the sole electron donor for photosynthesis. Two different types of purple bacteria, represented by strains L7 and SW2, were isolated which oxidized colorless ferrous iron under anoxic conditions in the light to brown ferric iron. Strain L7 had rod-shaped, nonmotile cells (1.3 by 2 to 3 microns) which frequently formed gas vesicles. In addition to ferrous iron, strain L7 used H2 + CO2, acetate, pyruvate, and glucose as substrate for phototrophic growth. Strain SW2 had small rod-shaped, nonmotile cells (0.5 by 1 to 1.5 microns). Besides ferrous iron, strain SW2 utilized H2 + CO2, monocarboxylic acids, glucose, and fructose. Neither strain utilized free sulfide; however, both strains grew on black ferrous sulfide (FeS) which was converted to ferric iron and sulfate. Strains L7 and SW2 grown photoheterotrophically without ferrous iron were purple to brownish red and yellowish brown, respectively; absorption spectra revealed peaks characteristic of bacteriochlorophyll a. The closest phototrophic relatives of strains L7 and SW2 so far examined on the basis of 16S rRNA sequences were species of the genera Chromatium (gamma subclass of proteobacteria) and Rhodobacter (alpha subclass), respectively. In mineral medium, the new isolates formed 7.6 g of cell dry mass per mol of Fe(II) oxidized, which is in good agreement with a photoautotrophic utilization of ferrous iron as electron donor for CO2 fixation. Dependence of ferrous iron oxidation on light and CO2 was also demonstrated in dense cell suspensions. In media containing both ferrous iron and an organic substrate (e.g., acetate, glucose), strain L7 utilized ferrous iron and the organic compound simultaneously; in contrast, strain SW2 started to oxidize ferrous iron only after consumption of the organic electron donor. Ferrous iron oxidation by anoxygenic phototrophs is understandable in terms of energetics. In contrast to the Fe3+/Fe2+ pair (E0 = +0.77 V) existing in acidic solutions, the relevant redox pair at pH 7 in bicarbonate-containing environments, Fe(OH)3 + HCO3-/FeCO3, has an E0' of +0.2 V. Ferrous iron at pH 7 can therefore donate electrons to the photosystem of anoxygenic phototrophs, which in purple bacteria has a midpoint potential around +0.45 V. The existence of ferrous iron-oxidizing anoxygenic phototrophs may offer an explanation for the deposition of early banded-iron formations in an assumed anoxic biosphere in Archean times.
Soda lakes are highly alkaline aquatic environments where evaporative concentration results in carbonate as a major dissolved anion. In these very productive environments prokaryotic photo-synthetic primary production is probably the driving force behind all nutrient recycling in these lakes. The major trophic groups responsible for cycling of carbon and sulphur have in general now been identified. Although there are many parallels with athalassohaline salt lake systems, systematic studies have shown that the microbes are obligately alkaliphilic or alkali-tolerant and many appear to represent separate alkaliphilic lineages within recognized taxa, indicating they may have evolved separately within the alkaline environment. As evaporative concentration continues, chloride ions also dominate in solution. As a consequence, a quite different population of prokaryotes is present in the trona (sodium sesquicarbonate) beds and concentrated lagoon brines of hypersaline lakes (Magadi-Natron basin) compared with more dilute lakes elsewhere in the East African Rift Valley.
A new species belonging to the photosynthetic bacterial genus Chromatium is described. This new organism differs from all other Chromatium species in its thermophilic character and hot-spring habitat. In addition, the combination of its carotenoid pigments, physiological peculiarities, and deoxyribonucleic acid base composition clearly define this isolate as a new species of photosynthetic purple bacteria. The organism is a rod-shaped, gram-negative bacterium which produces bacteriochlorophyll a,, and grows photoautotrophically with sulfide as an electron donor at an optimum temperature of 48 to 50°C. No growth is observed below 34°C or above 57OC. Globules of elemental sulfur are produced from the oxidation of sulfide and are stored intracellularly. Acetate and pyruvate are the only organic compounds that are photoassimilated. The major carotenoids of the new organism are rhodovibrin and spirilloxanthin, and the deoxyribonucleic acid base composition is 61 mol% guanine plus cytosine. Based on these characteristics, I propose a new species, Chromatium tepidum; the specific epithet refers to the moderately thermophilic nature of this hot-spring photosynthetic bacterium. Purple sulfur bacteria were observed in warm thermal springs as early as 1897 (13). From recent surveys of photosynthetic procaryotes that inhabit thermal springs it is clear that purple bacteria which resemble Chromatium are present at temperatures between 40 and 60"C, especially in springs containing significant levels of hydrogen sulfide (1-3). The first pure culture of a purple bacterium capable of growth at temperatures above 50°C was obtained by me and was identified as a Chromatium species by its rod-shaped morphology, assemblage of pigments, and ability to oxidize sulfide and store elemental sulfur intracellularly (8). Because the characteristics of this organism are unique among pub-lished descriptions of purple sulfur bacteria (family Chromatiaceae), the new organism is more thoroughly char-acterized in this paper and is described as a new species of the genus Chromatium, Chromatium tepidum.