Content uploaded by Fabrizio Didonna
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Fabrizio Didonna on Apr 20, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
8
Mindfulness and Feelings
of Emptiness
Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
“Nothing is as unbearable for man as to be completely at rest, without
passion, without business, without distraction, without application to
something.”
In such a state of rest man becomes aware of “his nothingness, his
foresakenness, his insufficiency, his dependence, his impotence, his
emptiness.”
Incontinently there springs from the depth of his soul “the ennui, the
blackness, the tristesse, the chagrin, the spite, the despair.”
Blaise Pascal
Introduction
The feeling of emptiness is a common symptom or phenomenological
experience found in clinical practice with several kinds of disorders. What is,
however, more difficult is finding two patients who describe this experience
in the same way. Patients report different experiences: “I feel an emptiness
inside,” “everything seems empty,” “I feel like I’m falling into a great empti-
ness,” “nothing makes sense because of the emptiness,” and many others.
Though at first sight they may appear to be very similar, some specific and
distinctive characteristics surface on closer observation. The diagnoses that
comprise these manifestations can be multiple and are recurrent in relation
to a series of disorders: from common depressive episodes to personality
disorders, even in comorbidity with other pathologies.
This phenomenon seems to be a universal human experience and might
not always seem directly linked to a pathology. All of us, at some moment in
our lives, can experience a “feeling of emptiness,” without suffering from
a mental disorder. Like many other nonspecific symptoms, the feeling of
emptiness is neither a necessary nor a sufficient reason for a frank diagnosis
although it has become one of the inclusion/exclusion nosological criteria of
borderline personality disorder (BPD) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Man-
ual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV, American Psychiatric Association, 2000).
The experience of emptiness has aroused the interest of well-known schol-
ars and has become the main subject of their writings. Unfortunately, few
thorough or rigorous studies have focused specifically on emptiness. This
may be because of the many methodological problems involved in this type
of study. For example, what do we mean by experience of emptiness? Does
this feeling of emptiness always present itself in the same way? Does it vary
125
126 Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
according to the disorder diagnosed? Although we will try to answer these
questions, at least in part, in this chapter, the main aim is to take the reader
through a theoretical reflection on the possible clinical use of mindfulness,
to alleviate, reduce, or eliminate the suffering caused by the experience of
emptiness as a pathological symptom.
Psychology and Emptiness
He who has a why to live, can bear almost any how
Nietzsche
The experience of emptiness has not been studied only by psychologists.
Various categories of scholars, including philosophers and theologists, have
been and still are interested in this phenomenon of human experience.
However, if we focus specifically on psychology, we can highlight some
epistemological approaches that, more than others, have tried to explain
this psychological experience. Cognitive-behavioral theory (Linehan, 1993;
Young, 1987), existential psychology (Frankl, 1975, 1963; May, 1950, 1953),
and psychoanalysis (Kernberg, 1975; Kohut, 1971, 1977) are some of the
theoretical perspectives that have provided important contributions to the
understanding of the experience of emptiness. These contributions will be
discussed in detail below.
Cognitive-Behavioral Theory and Feelings of Emptiness
Several cognitive-behavioral authors have suggested that the experience of
emptiness can be a sort of dysfunctional avoidance strategy in a situation of
deep subjective suffering (Beck, Freeman et al., 1990; Linehan, 1993; Young,
1987). Linehan (1993) bases her therapeutic model on the idea that the
inability to regulate and modulate painful emotions is an essential element
in explaining the behavioral difficulties of patients with BPD. These patients
present a sort of intolerance to negative emotions: “Many borderline patients
try to control their emotions simply by forcing themselves not to feel what
they are experiencing” (Linehan, 1993). Other researchers, such as Fiore and
Semerari (2003), speak of a state of emotional anesthesia to avoid any suf-
fering by which patients detach themselves from everything and everyone.
Young, Klosko, and Weishaar (2003) have identified various modes,mean-
ing the specific emotions, cognitions, and behavior active in a person in the
here and now. Among these, the detached protector mode aims at isolating
the person from his needs and feelings, creating a sort of detachment with
a protection purpose. The main symptoms of this mode include depersonal-
ization, self-harm, boredom, and feelings of emptiness. These theories can be
associated with Hayes, Wilson, Gifford, Follette, and Strosahl’s (1996) asser-
tions on experiential avoidance.
Experiential avoidance is a putative pathological process recognized by a
wide number of theoretical orientations. Experiential avoidance is the phe-
nomenon that occurs when a person is unwilling to remain in contact with
particular private experiences (e.g., bodily sensations, emotions, thoughts,
memories, and behavioral predispositions) and takes steps to alter the form
or frequency of these events and the contexts that occasion them. We occa-
sionally use terms such as emotional avoidance or cognitive avoidance
Chapter 8 Mindfulness and Feelings of Emptiness 127
rather than the more generic experiential avoidance when it is clear that
these are the relevant aspects of experience that the person seeks to escape,
avoid, or modify. We recognize that thoughts, memories, and emotions are
richly intermingled and do not mean to imply any necessary rigid distinc-
tion among them (although distinctions might be drawn by some theoretical
perspectives without threat to the underlying principle of experiential avoid-
ance) (Hayes et al., 1996).
The question, then, is what can a patient do if, as has been hypothesized by
the aforementioned authors, the feared stimulus is one’s own emotions? How
can a person avoid something that is not outside, but part of his or her natural
and theoretically adaptive response to the outside world? Certainly, a possi-
bility is to try not to feel, as was said above. Experiencing this “emptiness”
creates a detachment leading to actions aimed at distancing the subject from
the stimulus situation, that is, the negative emotions, replacing them with
physical pain (self-harm), numbness (alcohol or substance abuse), euphoria
(acting out dangerous behaviors), or physical gratification (sexual promiscu-
ity, bulimic crises), all manageable situations from the subject’s point of view.
Referring to the BPD, Linehan (1993) claims that exposure to an invalidat-
ing environment, where inadequate and unforeseeable answers follow the
manifestation of a person’s inner experiences, leads to the non-recognition
or inhibition of negative emotions. This continuous inhibition of negative
emotions leads to emotional avoidance. The paradigm, the author claims,
is similar to learning flight behavior to avoid painful stimuli. In this case,
the emotions, meaning the complex response of the body (activation of the
central nervous system accompanied on a neurovegetative, behavioral, and
cognitive level by specific modifications), seem to be conditioned. This con-
ditioning may have been caused by a repeated process of adversive asso-
ciation stimuli such as those previously described by Linehan regarding an
invalidating environment. If we add this to specific circumstances, increases
in fear not caused by events experienced by the subject but rather by the
simple repeated presentation of discriminative and conditioned stimuli, con-
nected to such events (Sanavio, 1991), we find that even simple physical
sensations, previously associated with a negative emotion, can produce a
phenomenon known as incubation of fear. The sense of emptiness could
be triggered by the simple arising of one of these discriminative stimuli, pre-
ceding the activation of the negative emotions, which the subject avoids and
sometimes fails to recognize.
Existential Psychology
Viktor Frankl coined the term “existential vacuum” (1963; 1973), and aspects
of the meaning of this term come close in meaning to the term “emptiness”
as described in this chapter. Frankl posits that humans have a “will to mean-
ing,” which is as basic to them as the will to power or the will to pleasure.
The frustration of the will to meaning results, in Frankl’s estimation, in a
“noogenic neurosis” – an abyss experience (Hazell, 2003). If meaning is what
you desire, then meaninglessness is a hole, an emptiness, in our lives. When-
ever you have a vacuum, of course, things rush in to fill it. Frankl (1963)
suggests that one of the most conspicuous signs of existential vacuum in
our society is boredom. He points out how often people, when they finally
128 Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
have the time to do what they want, don’t seem to want to do anything,
for example, people go into a tailspin when they retire, students get drunk
every weekend, and people submerge themselves in passive entertainment
every evening. He calls this the “Sunday neurosis” and defines it as “that
kind of depression which afflicts those who become aware of the lack of
content in their lives when the rush of the busy week is over and the void
within themselves becomes manifest” (Frankl, 1963, p. 169). The result of
this is an attempt to fill our existential vacuums with “stuff” that, because
it provides some satisfaction, we hope will provide ultimate satisfaction as
well; for example, we might try to fill our lives with pleasure, eating beyond
all necessity, having promiscuous sex, living “the high life;” we might seek
power, especially the power represented by monetary success; we might fill
our lives with “busyness,” conformity, and conventionality; or we might fill
the vacuum with anger and hatred and spend our days attempting to destroy
what we think is hurting us. We might also fill our lives with certain neurotic
“vicious cycles,” such as obsession with germs and cleanliness, or fear-driven
obsession with a phobic object. The defining quality of these vicious cycles
is that, whatever we do, it is never enough.
Frankl conducted many studies where he interviewed people on “existen-
tial emptiness” (1975). At the Policlinic Hospital in Vienna, he found that
55% of patients had experienced a loss in the meaning of life, and a statistical
survey showed that 25% of European and 50% of American students had had
this experience. In Frankl’s thinking, the experience of emptiness is made
up of two feelings: a feeling that life is meaningless and a feeling of inner
emptiness. This bifactorial quality in the experience of existential vacuum
is sometimes undifferentiated from other concepts such as boredom and
depression: “The existential vacuum manifests itself mainly in a state of bore-
dom” (Frankl, 1963, p. 169). Another important representative of existential
psychology, Rollo May (1950, 1953), has illustrated some useful ideas on the
concept of the experience of emptiness. In his earlier work, May (1950) con-
nects the experience of anxiety with the threat of nonbeing, that is, anxiety
is the experience of being affirming itself against nonbeing: “Emptiness and
loneliness, are thus the two phases of the basic experience of anxiety”. In
1953 (p. 14), he wrote: “...the chief problem of problem in the mid-decade
of the twentieth century is emptiness. By that I mean that not only do peo-
ple not know what they want; they often do not have any clear idea of what
they feel ...they have no definite experience of their desires or wants.” May
relates the experience of emptiness with turning to drug use or to the use of
sex in a mechanical way: “... the most common problem now is not social
taboos on sexual activity or guilt feelings about sex itself, but the fact that
sex for most people is an empty, mechanical and vacuous experience” (May,
1953, p. 15). This behavior, which is found rather frequently in some types of
disorders such as BPD, is often traced back by the same patients to their own
experience of emptiness. Other interesting reflections by the author refer
to the relationship between the experiences of emptiness, helplessness, and
powerlessness (May, 1953). The experience of emptiness rather generally
comes from people’s feeling that they are powerless to do anything effective
about their lives or the world they live in. Inner vacuousness is the long-
term accumulated result of a person’s particular conviction toward himself,
namely, that he or she cannot act as an entity in directing his or her own life,
Chapter 8 Mindfulness and Feelings of Emptiness 129
and since what he or she wants and what he or she feels can make no real
difference, he or she gives up wanting and feeling. Apathy and lack of feeling
are also defenses against anxiety (May, 1953, p. 22).
Psychoanalysis and Emptiness
As far as psychoanalysis is concerned, let us take a look at Otto Kernberg’s
work (1975) on the experience of emptiness. Kernberg used psychodynam-
ics and object-relations theory as a means of explaining the various forms the
experience might take. For him, the experience of emptiness arises when
there is a loss of what Jacobson (1964) calls “self feeling”. Kernberg points
out that although there are several forms of the experience of emptiness,
there are two broad reactions to the experience: that of “acting out” in a
forced attempt to regain a sense of internal aliveness and that of submit-
ting to the experience and going through one’s daily activities in a split-off,
mechanical fashion (Hazell, 2003).
Kernberg (1975) also highlights the difference between the two concepts
of emptiness and loneliness, which at times can be confused in a clinical
context: “loneliness implies elements of longing and the sense that there are
others that are needed, and whose love is needed and who seem unavail-
able now.” If this longing were present, the individual would not feel empty.
Emptiness is the lack of others without the realization of the lack or the
longing to fill the lack (Hazell, 2003). In general, Kernberg (1975, p. 220)
posits that: “The experience of emptiness represents a temporary or perma-
nent loss of the normal relationship of self with the object relations, that
is, with the world of inner objects that fixates intrapsychically the significant
experiences with others and constitutes a basic ingredient of ego-identity ....
Therefore, all patients with the syndrome of identity diffusion (but not with
identity crises) present the potential for developing experiences of empti-
ness.” The author hypothesizes that the experience of emptiness could be
different depending on the personality experiencing it, and he describes
the feeling of emptiness as it may occur in four personality types (depres-
sive, schizoid, narcissistic, and borderline), arguing that its form, intensity,
and etiology will differ for each type. While Kernberg interprets the expe-
rience largely in terms of object relations, Heinz Kohut (1977, p. 243) uses
the framework of “self psychology” to explain this experience: “The psy-
chology of the self is needed to explain the pathology of the fragmented self
and of the depleted self (empty depression, i.e., the world of unmirrored
ambitions, the world devoid of ideals).” He argues that the experience of
emptiness is a symptom of narcissistic personality disorders (NPDs). The self-
structure matures gradually in response to optimal failures in mirroring and
idealized figures. If the failures are sub-optimal, the self-structure becomes
friable and labile. One of the experiential outcroppings of this is the expe-
rience of emptiness, especially in the face of criticism or lack of warmth or
acclaim from the environment. Kohut argues that very often, in response to
early traumatic environmental failures, reactions develop, very often in the
way of a soothing mechanism, to cope with, and alleviate the pain of the
inner emptiness (Hazell, 2003). On occasion, a person will develop “a psy-
chic surface that is out of contact with an active nuclear self” (Kohut, 1977,
p. 49). This concept sounds extremely close to the concept of “false self
130 Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
system” proposed by Winnicott (1965a,b) and developed by Laing (1969).
The false self is like a mask or set of clothes, donned to adapt to society but
cut off from the individual’s real self that lies hidden, even to the individu-
als themselves. This psychological state can lead to frequent experiences of
emptiness: When the person attempts to discover his or her “true feelings,”
he or she is so alienated from them through habit that he or she draws a
blank and feels empty (Hazell, 2003).
Among the symptomatic responses to the experience of emptiness, Kohut
cites the following: an excessive interest in words, pseudovitality, compul-
sive sexuality, addictions, and delinquency. Each of these is a reaction to the
inner experience of emptiness and is employed as a means of counteract-
ing the experience in some way. Kohut also posits that young adulthood and
middle age are the critical testing grounds for the cohesiveness of the sense
of self, and there are thus times when the individual is especially prone to
experiences of emptiness.
Subtle variants of these psychodynamic explanations for the experience of
emptiness, basically growing out of “object relations theory,” can be found
in a number of other works. Bowlby (1980) follows the thought of Winni-
cott in that he connects feeling of emptiness with the experience of loss.
“Numbness” and “emptiness” are, in Bowlby’s model, the first phases of the
human being’s reaction to a loss. For Bowlby this loss is confined to a loss
through death. He argues, however, that a small loss may act as a trigger for
a prior, more serious loss. Bowlby also offers a hint at an explanation for the
feeling of emptiness or numbness although he does not propose it as such.
He cites the disruption of habitual responses that occur to the person who
has recently experienced a loss. This, in turn, leads to a vague sense of dis-
orientation, much akin to the disorientation Bowlby mentions in his earlier
works on attachment and separation (Bowlby, 1980, p. 94).
Feelings of Emptiness and Essential Needs
Other valuable hypotheses have been suggested by Almaas (1987) and
Trobe-Krishnananda (1999). Almaas (1987), in the chapter called “The The-
ory of Holes,” describes how energetic holes develop inside when an essen-
tial need is not met as a child. A hole is a feeling of emptiness inside in
relation to some aspect of our being that was not nourished and therefore
not developed. According to Trobe-Krishnananda (1999), because it is fright-
ening and uncomfortable to feel these holes, we spend much of our time and
energy in our daily life unconsciously trying to fill them. Much of our behav-
ior is directed at getting others to fill them. There may be many reasons that
these holes exist; many of them can be difficult to explain, but they are prob-
ably directly related to basic needs that remain unfulfilled. Although there is
really only one hole inside, the author makes distinctions to help with clarity.
Those of us who did not receive the support we needed to find out who we
were may develop a support hole. When we did not get the recognition we
needed, we have a recognition hole.Wecanhaveaworthiness hole when
we feel that we are not good enough as a person or when we don’t feel spe-
cial or respected. In this latter case, we then hunger for someone to validate
us with the hope that the hole can be filled. We may develop holes related
to being perfectionists and self-critical or to having deep fears of survival; we
Chapter 8 Mindfulness and Feelings of Emptiness 131
may have holes connected to feeling unwanted and abandoned or to getting
warmth, touch, and closeness; in this case, we become dependent on some-
one to provide that for us. We may also have a hole related to trust when
we feel that opening up and being vulnerable exposes us to mistreatment,
control, or manipulation by another.
The intensity and effects of these holes and the degree to which they can
affect the development and life of an individual may depend on the partic-
ular way in which he or she is able to deal with this experience. In some
cases, these holes create a co-dependency in which individuals continually
push other people away while longing for closeness at the same time. Our
holes create deep anxiety and our life becomes a constant unconscious com-
pulsion to fill them. Every hole creates a dependency on the outside in some
way, either by desiring another or a situation to fill it or by avoiding a per-
son or situation because of the hole. Our holes have a powerful effect on
the type of people and situations we attract. We have a compulsion to cre-
ate situations that provoke our holes because that is often the only way we
become aware that they are there. This is the way that we can learn about
and develop what is missing inside. We need the challenge to grow (Trobe-
Krishnananda, 1999).
When we don’t have awareness or understanding of our holes and the way
they are affecting our lives, we naturally feel that something on the outside
has to change for us to be happy. This is one of the cardinal beliefs of what
the Trobe-Krishnananda has called “emotional child” – an inner experience
of self, derived from the childhood wounds and negative experiences full of
fear, shame, and mistrust and covered with compulsive behavior. For exam-
ple, people can find themselves repeating the same painful patterns in their
relationships without understanding why; they can become lost in addictive
behavior, or they may have repetitive accidents or illnesses or sabotage their
life repeatedly (Trobe-Krishnananda, 1999). Because of the emptiness inside,
when individuals are identified with the emotional child,theyexperience
themselves as needy. It is not real, but it leads to their believing that life or
others have to fill the hole. People have to start treating us better or give us
more recognition, love, space, attention, and so on. Another reaction is that
individuals try to fill the holes with things that make them feel better such as
drugs, objects, or entertainment. It can be very difficult to find other ways to
end the discomfort, pain, anxiety, and fear that holes cause, without filling
them from the outside. People can realize that the efforts to fill the holes
from the outside never work – it only creates deeper frustration. What does
work is beginning to understand our holes – what they are, where they come
from, and how we can fill them. To do this, it could be helpful to have a look
at what the author calls “the essential needs”.
As a child, we each have essential needs (see also Bowlby, 1980). When
these needs are not met, we could live in a constant state of deprivation.
That deprivation is the hole inside, longing to be filled. While the degree
and types of deprivation vary, we all share a common experience of depri-
vation in some form. From our deprivation, we unconsciously project our
unmet needs onto our lovers, children, close friends, and those we work
with – in fact, on anyone with whom we relate. The closer the connection,
the deeper the projection. The experience of being deprived is universal,
and it is an important rite of passage. People usually start out in a state of
132 Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
denial, in which they are not even aware that they were deprived of cer-
tain essential needs or how. Trobe-Krishnananda (1999) highlighted some of
individuals’ essential needs: the need to feel wanted and to feel special and
respected; the need to have our emotions, thoughts, and perceptions vali-
dated (see also Chapter 11 in this volume); the need to be encouraged to
discover and explore our unique aptitudes and turns, sexuality, resourceful-
ness, creativity, joy, silence, and solitude; the need to feel secure, protected,
and supported; the need to be physically touched with loving presence; the
need to be inspired and motivated to learn; the need to know that it is right
to make mistakes and to learn from them; the need to witness love and inti-
macy; the need to be encouraged and supported to separate; and the need to
be given firm and loving limits and boundaries. This list is where an individ-
ual’s deprivation comes from, and it is ever present. It is interesting to notice
that when one starts a relationship with another person, very often he or she
is unconsciously experiencing these unmet needs. When there is no aware-
ness, the individual automatically moves into one of five behavioral patterns
of the emotional child: reaction and control, expectation and entitlement,
compromise, addictiveness, or magical thinking (Trobe-Krishnananda, 1999).
For this author, the starting point for overcoming these holes, and feelings of
emptiness, is recognizing how automatically people try to fill them from the
outside. This process of watching and understanding releases energy to break
the automatic behavior and just be with the experience of emptiness when
it is provoked. This means feeling it and letting it be there without trying to
fix or change anything. Mindfulness, as we will see in the last part of this
chapter, can be the core strategy to developing this non-reactive attitude.
Mindfulness and Emptiness: The “Paradox” of Meditation
If you say you are somebody, you are attached to name and form,
so I will hit you thirty times.
If you say you are nobody, you are attached to emptiness,
so I will hit you thirty times.
What can you do?
Soen Sa Nim (Citated in J. Kabat-Zinn, Coming to Our Senses)
As we mentioned in the introductory paragraph, the aim of this chapter is
to theorize a possible clinical use of mindfulness to treat the pathological feel-
ing of emptiness. To be able to speak about the relationship between mind-
fulness and emptiness, it is essential to know how it is conceived within the
psychological and philosophical approaches and traditions that have given
origin to meditative practice.
The concept of emptiness in Eastern psychology and culture is totally unre-
lated to that of the West, especially considering the negative value that is
commonly ascribed to it in the West. An analysis of the classical texts of Tao-
ism or Chinese Buddhism is enough to conclude that the Christian-Western
concepts are basically opposite of those illustrated in Eastern thought.
The majority of Buddhist schools share a series of basic common prin-
ciples. What interests us is called Sunyata (Sanskrit), generally translated
into English as “emptiness” or “voidness.” This is a concept of central impor-
tance in the teaching of Buddha since a direct realization of Sunyata is a
Chapter 8 Mindfulness and Feelings of Emptiness 133
requirement for achieving liberation from the cycle of existence (samsara)
and full enlightenment. Widely misconceived as a doctrine of nihilism, the
teaching on the emptiness of people and phenomena is unique to Buddhism,
constituting an important metaphysical critique of theism with profound
implications for epistemology and phenomenology.
Sunyata means that everything one encounters in life is empty of abso-
lute identity, permanence, or “self.” This is because everything is interrelated
and mutually dependent – never wholly self-sufficient or independent. All
things are in a state of constant flux where energy and information are for-
ever flowing throughout the natural world giving rise to themselves under-
going major transformations with the passage of time. This teaching never
connotes nihilism – nihilism is, in fact, a belief or point of view that Buddha
explicitly taught was incorrect – a delusion, just as the view of materialism, is
a delusion. In the English language, the word emptiness suggests the absence
of spiritual meaning or a personal feeling of alienation, but in Buddhism the
emptiness of phenomena enables liberation from the limitations of form in
the cycle of uncontrolled rebirth. Kabat-Zinn (2005, p. 180) explains the
concept:
People can get scared even hearing such a thing, and may think that it is
nihilistic. But it is not nihilistic at all; emptiness means empty of inherent self-
existence, in other words that nothing, no person, no business, no nation or
atom exists in and of itself as an enduring entity, isolated, absolute, indepen-
dent of everything else. Nothing! Everything emerges out of the complex play
of particular causes and conditions that are themselves always changing. This
is a tremendous insight into the nature of reality.”
Further he posits that “Emptiness is intimately related to fullness. Empti-
ness doesn’t mean a meaningless void [...]emptiness is fullness, [...]is the
invisible, intangible “space” within which discrete events can emerge and
unfold. No emptiness, no fullness.”
Rawson (1991) states that “One potent metaphor for the Void, often used
in Tibetan art, is the sky. As the sky is the emptiness that offers clouds to
our perception, so the Void is the ‘space’ in which objects appear to us in
response to our attachments and longings.” The Japanese use of the Chinese
character signifying Sunyata is also used to connote sky or air.
Sunyata is a key theme of the heart sutra (one of the Mahayana Perfec-
tion of Wisdom Sutras), which is commonly chanted by Mahayana Buddhists
worldwide. The heart sutra declares that the skandhas, which constitute
our mental and physical existence, are empty of any such nature or essence.
However, it also states that this emptiness is the same as form (which con-
notes fullness), that this is an emptiness which is at the same time not differ-
ent from the kind of reality which we normally ascribe to events, and that
it is not a nihilistic emptiness that undermines our world, but a “positive”
emptiness that defines it.
The inability to experience emptiness (Sunyata), considered as the true
nature of reality, would represent a sort of primordial ignorance of the human
being (avidya). When this happens, it is called nirvana (the awakening) in
Buddhism. This concept is a central part of all the Buddhist psychology, so
much so that the teachings of Buddhism on the nature of reality develop
in order to help understand this vacuity. Mark Medweth (2007) explains
134 Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
this notion of emptiness in Buddhism: “Emptiness has been a term used
to describe many psychological states in the West, including the confusing
numbness of the psychotic, incomplete feelings of the personality disorders,
identity diffusion and existential meaninglessness (Epstein, 1989). Buddhists,
however, refer to emptiness as the ultimate reality. Emptiness assumes a
defining role in the notion of ‘self’; it is the experience of emptiness that
destroys the idea of a continuous, independent individual nature. Unlike
many Western misconceptions, emptiness is not an end in itself nor is empti-
ness considered real in a concrete sense but merely a specific negative of
inherent existence (Epstein, 1988). While the ordinary consciousness per-
ceives things as permanent and independent, Buddhists would counter that
perceived phenomena are interdependent and thus empty of permanence
and without an identity based on their own assumed nature (Komito, 1984).
In relation to the sense-of-self, in Buddhism, emptiness does not imply (as
Westerners have often interpreted) the abandonment or annihilation of the
ego, ‘self,’ or ‘I’ but simply a recognition that this ‘self’ actually never existed
at all (Epstein, 1989). Buddhism is not an escape from the world but sim-
ply a refusal to extend or exaggerate the importance of conventional reality.
In so doing, the mind becomes empty of struggle, allowing us to see things
as they are in an ultimate sense. Thus, in Buddhist psychology, the empty
quality of the mind is regarded as the true nature of a person.” Therefore, a
translation of this mental and experiential state in Western terms is what we
called “mindemptiness”.
The Feeling of Emptiness as an Indicator
of Psychopathology
There are many psychological disorders in which the feeling of emptiness
generally presents itself as a transitory symptom (e.g., eating disorders,
obsessive compulsive disorders, PTSD, schizophrenia) or as a rather stable
phenomenological condition (personality disorders). Describing all these dis-
orders is beyond the scope of this chapter, so we will limit the following
discussion to pathologies where the feeling of emptiness often appears to be
a central and recurrent experience of the pathology.
Personality Disorders and Emptiness
All clinicians who have worked with personality disorders are familiar with
the relationship between this type of disorder and the experience, often
reported by patients during sessions, of the feeling of emptiness. The descrip-
tions, the hypothesized causes, and the consequences of experiencing these
sensations vary greatly even within the different disorders in Axis II (DSM-IV,
1994). We will now try to discuss what “emptiness” means when we come
across a patient with a specific personality disorder.
Borderline Personality Disorder
The main characteristics of BPD, as reported in the DSM-IV (APA, 2000), are
a pervasive instability condition of interpersonal relations, self-esteem, and
mood and a marked impulsiveness, with onset in early adult age and occur-
ring in several contexts. Among all the diagnostic criteria of the disorder,
Chapter 8 Mindfulness and Feelings of Emptiness 135
criterion 7 specifies, “These individuals can be affected by chronic feelings
of emptiness. They are easily bored, they are continuously searching for
something to do.” This state, as well as anger, has been a specific charac-
teristic of this disorder since its first formalized empirical descriptions (Fiore
& Semerari, 2003). Kernberg (1975), in his descriptive analysis, considers it a
minor criterion. Other important authors like Gunderson and Singer (1975)
or Spitzer (1975) consider this diagnostic criterion a discriminating feature
of this disorder.
As previously pointed out, several authors in the field of cognitive-
behavioral therapy think that the experience of emptiness in BPD can be
a sort of dysfunctional avoidance strategy in situations of clear subjective suf-
fering and associated with a major risk of abuse or injuries to self and others
(Beck, Freeman et al., 1990; Linehan, 1993; Young, 1987). According to Fiore
and Semerari (2003), the perception, in this type of patient, of the “unwor-
thy self” and the “vulnerable self” can expose them to intolerable pressure.
At times, patients succeed in escaping this pressure, detaching themselves
from everybody and everything and entering into a state of numbness. This
is the condition where frequent suicide attempts and self-injuries occur more
frequently, representing a state of complete detachment from the world or a
way to evoke such detachment. Other times, according to these authors, the
emptiness can be perceived as “a painful sense of lack of purpose.” In these
cases, patients tend to react by raising their level of arousal, for example,
seeking promiscuous sexual relationships, dangerous acting out, and alcohol
or substance abuse to the point of no return or bulimic crises.
From a psychodynamic perspective, Pazzagli and Monti (2000) for research
purposes consider that two of the criteria listed in the DSM-IV for BPD diag-
nosis, chronic feelings of emptiness and efforts to avoid abandonment, can
be appropriately grouped together in the concepts of “solitude and empti-
ness.” According to the authors, the borderline person functions via osmosis:
He is empty but, at the same time, intolerant of a solitude in which he keeps
looking for objects to fill this inner sense of emptiness. The solitude of the
BPD patient is actually an intolerance of true solitude, the solitude of being
able to be alone. It is a solitude dominated by emptiness: a void in the outside
world, made up of inadequate objects, sporadic, stormy, and superficial rela-
tionships prone to sudden break-ups, and a void in the inner world, always
subject to the threat of rupturing and the loss of limits.
In a research study conducted by Rogers, Widiger, and Krupp (1995) aimed
at identifying the qualitative differences of depression diagnosed in patients
with BPD and others, the most frequent aspects associated with depression
were found to be self-condemnation, emptiness, abandonment fears, self-
destructiveness, and hopelessness. The authors conclude that the depression
associated with borderline pathology is unique in certain aspects. The impli-
cations of the study outline the importance of considering the phenomeno-
logical aspects of depression, among which is the experience of emptiness,
in the BPD. Leichsenring (2004) reports the following in another study: “Clin-
ical observations suggest that depressive experiences in patients with bor-
derline personality disorder have a specific quality. These experiences are
characterized by emptiness and anger (‘angry depression’).” In this study,
this observation was tested empirically. Westen et al. (1992) found an inter-
personally focused “borderline depression” that was phenomenologically
136 Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
characterized by emptiness, loneliness, despair, and an unstable negative
affectivity. The quality of the depression may also have consequences for
pharmacotherapy (Westen et al., 1992, p. 391). The qualitative experience
of depression (e.g., emptiness or anger) may influence a patient’s reaction to
drugs more strongly than the diagnosis (depression).
Narcissistic Personality Disorder
The essential characteristic of NPD is a pervasive picture of grandiosity,
necessity of admiration, and lack of empathy, with onset in early adult age
and present in a variety of contexts (DSM-IV, APA, 2000). On the whole, we
can say that the authors studying the disorder can be divided into those who
describe some subtypes (Gabbard, 1989; Millon, 1999) and those who lean
more to a Horowitz-type interpretation assuming that a subject experiences
a set of multiple distinct mental states. These authors observe how the nar-
cissists oscillate between states of grandiosity, emptiness, shame, anguished
depression, and dysregulated affect with acting-out tendencies (Horowitz,
1989; Young & Flanagan, 1998; Dimaggio et al., 2002). A substantial agree-
ment exists between the various authors: It is most probable that the narcis-
sist experiences on the whole mental states described in the literature and
that the diagnosed subtype is characterized by the most important and mani-
fest of mental states. Dimaggio et al. (2002) have identified in their work four
mental states: grandiosity, transition, frightening depression, and devitalized
emptiness. In this state of devitalized emptiness, the emotional experience
is completely shut down; not only are feelings of weakness and fragility “sco-
tomized” (obscured, clouded), but also feelings overall are. Subjects feel cold,
detached, distanced from others and from their own inner experience, and
they perceive an almost unreal world; their body is annoyingly far away and
they are anhedonic. The experience is not at all intensely unpleasant; for
a long time narcissists dwell in this state where they are untouchable, not
subject to self-esteem fluctuations and to the complex, annoying, and incom-
prehensible demands of others.
The fantasy of success and almightiness can fill up mental life even
though these subjects lack the triumphant echoes overwhelming the state
of grandiosity. The aims are mostly inactive. This state largely coincides
with the clinical descriptions of Modell (1984), which describes patients
as being closed up as if in a “cocoon.” In the long run, this state becomes
ego-dystonic: The subject perceives life as empty and boring, the emotional
coldness touches him, and his need for relationships surfaces unconfessed
(Dimaggio, Petrilli, Fiore, & Mancioppi, 2003).
The sense of emptiness as an important and distinctive experience in NPD
has been indicated by a large number of authors. Forman (1975) made a
summary of the characteristics that emerge from the descriptions of Kohut
(1971). The most important are low self-esteem, a tendency to have hypocon-
driac episodes, and a feeling of emptiness or a deficiency of vital force.
Millon (1996) gives us the following description of the narcissistic prototype
at a biopsychological level in clinical settings: “the narcissistic personality
presents a general indifference, unflappability, and fake tranquility...except
when his narcissistic confidence is threatened, where brief demonstrations
of anger, shame or feelings of emptiness appear.” Millon identifies rational-
ization as a mechanism of defense in NPD; if the rationalization fails, these
Chapter 8 Mindfulness and Feelings of Emptiness 137
individuals often feel rejected and embarrassed, and experience feelings of
emptiness. Kernberg (1975) explains how the experience of emptiness in
narcissists is characterized by the addition of strong feelings of boredom
and restlessness: “Patients with depressive personality and even schizoid
patients, are able to empathize deeply with human feelings and experiences
involving other people, and may feel painfully excluded from and yet able to
empathize with love and emotion involving others...patients with narcissis-
tic personalities, on the other hand, do not have that capacity for empathiz-
ing with human experience in depth. Their social life, which gives them
opportunities to obtain confirmation in reality or fantasy of their needs to be
admired, and offers them direct instinctual gratifications, may provide them
with an immediate sense of meaningfulness, but this is temporary. When
such gratifications are not forthcoming, their sense of emptiness, restless-
ness and boredom take over. Now their world becomes a prison from which
only new excitement, admiration, or experiences implying control, triumph
or incorporation of supplies, are an escape. Deep emotional reactions to art,
the investment in value systems or in creativity beyond gratification of their
narcissistic aims, is often unavailable and indeed strange to them” (1975,
p. 218)
Schizoid Personality Disorder
The essential characteristics of schizoid personality disorder are a pervasive
condition of detachment from social relations and a restricted range of emo-
tional experiences and expressions in interpersonal contexts. The onset of
this condition is in early adult age, and it is present in a variety of contexts
(DSM-IV, APA, 2000).
Kernberg (1975), as previously indicated, thinks that the experience of
emptiness varies in form, intensity, and etiology in relation to the type of
personality disorder affecting the patient. Even in schizoid disorders, spe-
cific characteristics of emptiness are obviously present. According to the
author, these individuals can experience the emptiness as an inborn qual-
ity that makes them different from others: “in contrast to others, they cannot
feel anything and they may feel guilty because they do not have feelings
of love, hatred, tenderness, longing or mourning which they observe and
understand in other people, but feel they cannot count on to experience
themselves” (1975, p. 215). For these schizoid patients, the experience of
emptiness can be less painful than for the depressed because the contrast
between the periods when they feel empty and those when they would like
to have emotional relations with others is less violent. A feeling of inner fluc-
tuation, of subjective unreality, and the appeasement derived from this same
unreality make the vacuous experience more acceptable to schizoids, allow-
ing them to fill in time with the awareness of external reality opposed to
their subjective experience.
Depression and Emptiness
Many people who come to therapy complain about having a senseless life.
Their words express the idea of deep and anguishing “emptiness” leading
them to wish for death as a liberation from this state. These patients often suf-
fer from depression, and what has been described is only the manifestation
138 Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
of one of the many emotional, cognitive, and physical symptoms marking the
disease.
Maureta Reyes (2007) defines this existential emptiness as:
the feeling of a lack of a sense in life, of tediousness, of not knowing the reason
for living, leading to isolation and impoverishment of the relation with family
and society [...]patients with this problem, usually experience moments of
strong tension and anxiety attacks without a valid reason, they worry about
everything, but nothing seriously, they have lost the motivation and interest for
everything and this makes them think that living is the worst thing that can
happen to them. When this situation is prolonged, becoming more intense, it
can lead to suicide.
This type of experience, described as such, appears more frequently in
certain periods of life, for example, during old age, retirement, or the course
of a terminal illness, or in the so-called empty-nest syndrome when adult
children abandon the family home. In the latter case, women, seeing their
role as mothers ending – their children having little need for them and their
husbandsbusyatwork,spendinglittletimewiththem–aremoreprone
to feeling depressive symptoms and a sense of emptiness. Old age, though,
is surely a period where this type of feeling of emptiness becomes more
present. Faced with fears associated with becoming old, such as isolation,
solitude, physical decline, no longer being desired, uselessness, the loss of
every role in society or in the family, and illness, it is easy to imagine how
the lack of one’s own sense of life leads to experiencing emptiness.
The feeling of emptiness in depression is often associated with significant
experiences of loss (see also Bowlby, 1980), above all in conjunction with a
first depressive episode (see also Chapter 12). In some cases, the feeling of
emptiness is connected not only to what is no longer there, but also to what
will no longer be there in the future.
In the following case example, a 41-year-old depressed patient describes
her deep sense of emptiness derived from the loss of her 15-year-old son who
died tragically in a car accident:
I would never have thought that, from one day to another, life could
change so violently and destructively. With N’s death, I find myself having
to reinvent everything, fighting against this harsh reality, with all its emo-
tions and feelings. It is unthinkable that he is no longer here with me and
that he has left this immense emptiness just in this moment: a life yet to
start, come to a sudden end by such an unfair destiny.
The pain is so great that with its presence, it is actually physical every
time I think of the things N. liked and loved to spend his time on, his
determination and will to live. It’s like suddenly opening a door without
expecting to find someone there: an icy wave, a shock which rises up from
my feet and leaves me momentarily incredulous that all this belongs to
me. A great weakness is left behind and a loss of feeling pervades my
arms and hands. I get a tingling which becomes all one with a pain in
my stomach as if it were knotted. These are very hard moments that make
me realize that I’ll never have him near me again. This great emptiness
that I perceive projects itself not so much in my past memories which are
alive, but based on the fact that I will never experience some situations or
Chapter 8 Mindfulness and Feelings of Emptiness 139
share them with him. There is only emptiness when I think I’ll never be
able to listen to his secrets, there won’t be any requests of advice, I won’t
be able to see him growing up, becoming a man. I won’t be able to get
excited about his first love, a disappointment, a defeat or a victory. There
will only be the lack of a relationship based on participation, bonding,
joining of forces that was just starting and I was really waiting for. Why
has all this been denied me? Everything has become null and void when I
think of all that has been left suspended: it’s like an abnormal condition
in my life that I don’t know how long will last. It’s as if, while I’m watching
a TV programme, this suddenly changes and I’m left here waiting in vain
foreverythingtogobacktonormal,tothepreviousprogramme.
In this patient, like in other individuals suffering from major depression,
the deep and overwhelming feeling of emptiness was determined on the one
hand by what was no longer in her life, but on the other hand by the loss of
what there would not be in the future and that never more will be, that is,
the ineluctable interruption of a plan, a loss in the future.
How Mindfulness Can Help to Deal with and Overcome
the Feeling of Emptiness
There is nothing greater than anything else
Plutarco, Adversus Colotem
Mindfulness as an Anti-avoidance Strategy
If we hypothesize the feeling of emptiness as a sort of emotional avoidance
of a phobic stimulus situation (negative emotion), it is then right to think
that the treatment should include the exposure to the stimulus provoking
fear in the absence of the feared consequences. During this exposure, the
patient is asked to pay attention to the stimuli that he or she usually system-
atically avoids in a controlled way, showing him or her with the same stimuli
(imaginatively or in vivo), thereby hampering avoidance so that the patient
can experience the harmlessness of the stimulus.
It is assumed that exposure causes habituation to the stimulus or a process
of extinction of the avoided reactions, favoring the emotional coping, that is,
preparing the subject to face the emotions resulting from feared situations.
Baer (2003) affirms that among the mechanisms explaining the clinical effec-
tiveness of mindfulness, one of the most important is experimenting through
exercises a form of “exposure” to various types of information (extere-
oceptive and interoceptive) that are usually avoided and/or suppressed.
Kabat-Zinn (1982) used mindfulness on patients affected by chronic pain.
The author has stated that guiding patients to develop a non-judgmental atti-
tude with respect to their own feelings of pain, and helping them to curi-
ously observe them without reacting impatiently or intolerantly, resulted in
a significant reduction in suffering, not related to the sensory perception of
pain but to their own emotional reactivity (aversion) toward the perceived
feelings. This can be considered an extended exposure associated with an
140 Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
attitude of acceptance of physical pain. The result would be an increase in
tolerance toward the suffering and a reduction in the reactive emotionality.
Linehan (1993) starts from the theoretical assumption that BPD emotional
distress is mainly derived from secondary responses (e.g., deep shame, anx-
iety,anger,orguilt)totheprimaryemotionsthatoften,instead,would
be adaptive and context appropriate. A reduction in this secondary stress
requires exposure to primary emotions in non-judgmental circumstances.
In a similar context, awareness and non-judgmental attention toward one’s
own emotional responses can be considered a technical exposure. The basic
concept is that exposure to intense or painful emotions, without associating
negative consequences, will extinguish their ability to stimulate negative sec-
ondary affects. If a patient judges negative emotions as “bad” or “wrong,” it
is obvious that every time he or she experiences them, he or she will have
feelings of guilt, anger, and/or anxiety. Adding these feelings to an already
negative situation will only increase the patient’s distress and will only make
it more difficult to put up with the anguish. Mindfulness is the ability to
ensure or the set of skills capable of ensuring that the patient enacts this
form of perception, taking advantage of all the assumptions needed for it to
be effective. During the practice of mindfulness, we can keep frequency and
duration of the exposure under control. The exercises can be guided so that
they will be clearly specified and last long enough. Intensity can also be man-
aged by leading patients to set their non-judgmental attention and awareness
on elements outside themselves and far from anxiety-producing stimuli: As
they progress in the process, they bring themselves closer to their physical
sensations, thoughts and, lastly, to their negative emotions. The validating
environment, during mindfulness training, accepts any experience originat-
ing from practice, informing patients that accepting reality does not neces-
sarily mean approving it.
Exposure is probably not the only active factor in the process of mind-
fulness clinical effectiveness that could refer to the experience of empti-
ness. The mechanisms implementing these effects are in our opinion closely
related to the development and initiation of meta-cognitive processes regard-
ing the aforementioned experience.
Detachment and Decentering
One of the more important processes in the state of mindfulness is detach-
ment (detached mindfulness; Wells, 1997, 2000, 2006; see also Chapters 5
and 11). According to the author, this attitude would be characterized by
meta-awareness (a form of objective conscience of thoughts), cognitive
decentering (acquired consciousness that thoughts are just thoughts, not
facts), attentive flexibility (self-regulation of attention including both sus-
tained attention and skills in switching, and meta-attention; see also next
paragraph and Chapter 11 of this volume), low levels of conceptual process-
ing (low levels of inner dialogue), and a low level of coping behaviors aimed
at the avoidance or reduction of the threat. This is the equivalent of affirming
that the patient becomes aware of his or her feelings mainly due to the ability
to observe them, implementing a decentering from them, and developing a
better understanding of his or her own cognitive functioning.
Chapter 8 Mindfulness and Feelings of Emptiness 141
Self-Regulation of Attention
Bishop et al. (2004) consider self-regulation of attention to be central among
the main cognitive processes that lead to mindfulness (see also Chapters 5
and 11 of this volume). Wallance and Shapiro (2006) also say that there are
two types of attentive ability: One deals with the ability to continuously
support voluntary attention on a familiar object without forgetfulnesses or
distractions; the other, called “meta-attention,” refers to the ability to moni-
tor the quality of the attention, quickly recognizing if he or she has yielded
to sluggishness or excitement. The concept of self-regulation of attention
would then include three sub-functions: the ability to shift attention from
one content to another, the ability to stay focused on a single object, and
the meta-attentive ability leading to recognizing the moments where the
attention has shifted toward other mental objects. In the process of dynam-
ics, the self-regulation of attention constantly interacts with two other fac-
tors: the unconditioned openness of behavior toward the tried experience
(acceptance equanimity) and the continual consideration given to the func-
tional objectives of the momentary task (intention). The self-regulation of
attention becomes extremely useful in helping subjects to focus on the
components of the experience of emptiness, overcoming the difficulties
that are often present in deciphering their own emotional and cognitive
state.
Acceptance
Acceptance, another basic component of the state of mindfulness, has an
essential role in allowing the patient to stay in touch with his or her own
experience of emptiness, thus allowing the exposure to painful stimuli,
whichever they are. Acceptance allows the patient, in a state of psychological
openness and willingness, and through a gentle curiosity to approach various
sources of aversive stimulation that has till that moment caused the person
behavioral patterns of escape, refusal, or avoidance. For Hayes (1994), accep-
tance is a position relative to which previously intrinsically problematic or
painful events become an opportunity of personal growth and development.
Donaldson (2003) and Wells (2002) consider it a meta-cognitive process
operating at a higher level than that of immediate experience, a “meta”
level implying the direct perception of thoughts, feelings, or intentions of
purpose.
Accepting is receiving, welcoming the experience of the moment, stay-
ing fully in touch with one’s own thoughts, emotions and physical feelings,
without reacting to and developing a decentered ability to observe them.
Acceptance gives us the possibility to see our experience in the moment as
it really is. However, accepting does not actually mean appreciating what
we accept. The experience of emptiness could for a certain period of time
be admitted and accepted. This would give the patient the opportunity
to observe the consequences of this contact without negatively labeling it
through judgment.
In a state of acceptance, the person recognizes that some aspects of the
experience cannot be changed while he succeeds in realizing the elements
that can. The patient will, therefore, channel his or her energies toward these
142 Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
latter ones, trying to respond, where possible, through a thoughtful action,
rather than reacting (with automatic and impulsive actions) to the distressing
experience in order to reduce, and often cancel out, the aversive psycholog-
ical component of the experience. All the signs that accompany the experi-
ence of emptiness are usually submitted to meta-evaluation (a meta-cognitive
process) by the subject; that is, they are affected by a negative meaning con-
sidered highly disagreeable or unbearable, leading the individual to various
attempts of suppression or avoidance. Unconditioned acceptance would be a
different way to relate to the experience that would reduce cognitive avoid-
ance, thereby eliminating one of the factors responsible for the suffering
(Didonna, 2007).
Letting Go
Letting go is the ability directly connected to acceptance that can fail to be
immediately experienced when the patient comes into contact with certain
disagreeable thoughts or feelings. Kabat-Zinn (1990) states that in the prac-
tice of meditation, we deliberately put aside that part of the mind clinging
to certain aspects of our experience and reject others. The non-attachment,
the letting go, is a form of acceptance of the things as they are. This ability
allows patients to give the same attention to all stimuli, regardless of his or
her need to hold on to or distance him/herself from those aspects of the
experience of emptiness that cause suffering, or “entrapping” them in a cer-
tain mental state.
Not Striving
Not striving is the attitude where the patient does not pursue any precise aim
during the practice of mindfulness. There is nothing that he or she should or
should not do. Nothing has to be reached. It is enough “to be” and to remain
in the present, bringing his or her own attention to himself/herself. We need
to ask patients not to want to attain any changes or expect to modify their
own experience of emptiness. The only thing they are to do is to remain
there and observe. The change, if it happens, will paradoxically be the result
of not having sought it out.
Identifying the Precocious Signs of Emptiness
Another important mechanism of change of mindfulness for the experience
of emptiness could be the precious aid given to the ability to identify the
feelings, thoughts, or situations leading to the feeling of emptiness early.
Mindfulness allows patients to gather these signs, which differ depending
on each patient’s own experience, from the onset, helping to identify the
suitable moment in order to use appropriate coping strategies and not to
remain “entrapped” in the emptiness that leads to having to resort to dys-
functional solutions. Baer (2003) suggests that mindfulness training may pro-
mote recognition of early signs of a problem, at a time when application of
previously learned skills will be most likely to be effective in preventing the
problem.
Chapter 8 Mindfulness and Feelings of Emptiness 143
Clinical Application of Mindfulness to the Experience
of Emptiness
Practical Issues
A mindfulness-based intervention with patients affected from a pathological
“feeling of emptiness” should be carried out by an expert therapist in the
practice of meditation. In addition, the therapist should have good clinical
competence with respect to all the psychological problems of the patient
toward which the intervention is directed. The therapist should be ready
to effectively deal with the eventual intense reactions that could be activated
during the sessions, including dissociative crises and intense states of anxiety
or escape.
Many patients who feel emptiness have a long history in invalidating envi-
ronments where their emotions, feelings, and needs have been denied recur-
rently, and the only remaining inner criteria is the one labeling their own
inner experience of the moment as unreliable or dangerous. It is therefore
useful and important to help the patient trust and believe what he or she
is feeling, in his or her own cognitive, emotional, and sensory experience,
learning to listen to herself/himself. Furthermore, a regular practice of mind-
fulness by the patient outside of the therapeutic setting is necessary. It is vital
that he/she has the possibility to find a small amount of time to dedicate to
meditative practice every day (even 10–15 minutes). This intervention could
be integrated in a structured mindfulness-based program (e.g., MBSR, MBCT)
or form a specific independent intervention that could be implemented in
an individual or group setting.
The final goal of this training is to lead the patient to explore and confront
his or her own emotions, mainly anxiety, which, as we have hypothesized
above, appears to be strictly related to the emptiness experienced in certain
types of disorders. As suggested by Trobe-Krishnananda (1996), the objec-
tive is to penetrate the fear in depth, but with awareness, compassion, and
understanding, giving value to these feelings and creating an inner space to
allow patients to feel, observe, and accept.
Venturing into this layer of vulnerability is not an easy task for the
patient affected by feelings of pathological emptiness. As we have previously
explained, these people are used to activating a set of avoidance strategies
and mechanisms in order not to feel the suffering. This “shell” keeps psy-
chological fear and pain away, even at the cost of developing alexithymia or
turning psychological suffering into a physical one, sometimes putting the
patient’s life at risk.
In our opinion, approaching the emotional sphere should take place in a
gradual way, with the utmost caution. The activation of emotions at a neu-
rovegetative level is often undifferentiated and can be the same for different
emotions. Any element of this activation can lead the patient back to a state
of emptiness, given the strong evocative potential for emotions associated
thereto. Every session, in such a structured intervention, should include a
gradual increase in the level of difficulty, that is, taking the patient a little
closer to the stimuli, situations, and feelings connected to emptiness. Every-
thing has to take place in a completely acceptable and non-judgmental frame-
work. In order to do this, we suggest starting the intervention by teaching
144 Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
patients to initially focus attention on exteroceptive stimuli, which are usu-
ally less anxiety inducing, doing exercises like mindful seeing or hearing, or
mindful walking (see Appendix A). Only at a later stage, during the course
of the program, are they conscientiously drawn closer to their inner feel-
ings and, therefore, to the enteroceptive experiences; some exercises such
as body scan or sitting meditation (see Appendix A) would be suitable for
this purpose (Didonna, 2007, paper submitted for publication).
Once these abilities have been consolidated, for example, “letting go,” not
passing judgment on their own experience, or “trusting” their own percep-
tions (see also Chapter 11), patients should be in a position to be in contact
with thoughts, feelings, and negative mindsets without enacting avoidance
behaviors. Moreover, during the course of the treatment, patients have the
opportunity to observe their own state of emptiness, to become aware of
its components, and above all, to perceive how secondary emotions and the
increase in emotional reactivity in those situations have decreased, reducing
the level of suffering of this experience. The patient should no longer judge
or blame himself/herself for feeling what he or she feels.
Staying in Touch with the Feeling of Emptiness
At a certain point in the therapeutic program, the patient should directly
face the experience of emptiness. Specific exercises can be developed to
help the patient to voluntarily enter into such a state. The fear of feeling pain
can keep patients distanced from their own feelings. A particular atmosphere
of acceptance, presenting them with a gentle invitation to get in touch with
what they fear, is required. There must be no pressure or judgment. In order
to recreate this state, it might be sufficient to ask patients to remember the
last time they felt this way, or the time when the feeling was so strong that
they did something particular in order not to feel it. Being “with themselves”
in those moments was not a pleasant feeling.
These experiences can be explored with the guidance of the therapist,
helping patients to focus their attention on certain aspects in order not to
let themselves go, thereby avoiding passing judgment on themselves. The
most important thing is to learn to recognize what is happening, intimately
bonding with what was previously avoided. The instructions could invite the
patient to focus their own attention on those aspects, for example, allow-
ing them to remain inside their experience, preventing the activation of the
escape behavior, or observing how the sense of threat is perceived, or simply
examining when and which type of impulses occur during the session. This
could help, in some cases, to identify even the nature of their own fear con-
nected with the feeling of emptiness (abandonment, failure, violence, judg-
ment, and the thought that the fear will never end) more easily recognized
observing the contents of thoughts in this state.
It is natural for these patients to fear being overwhelmed by the feeling of
emptiness they encounter. The idea of being in contact and remaining with
the feeling is terrifying. For this reason, the method used needs to be well
consolidated, offering a “safe base” made up of previously acquired experi-
ences and abilities, which are needed to deal with stimuli with greater aver-
sive potential. The approach has to happen gradually, with the maximum
sensitivity and without haste, but with the knowledge that with mindfulness
Chapter 8 Mindfulness and Feelings of Emptiness 145
meditation, the individual needs to go through the feeling of emptiness if he
or she wants to be free.
Some possible instructions that can be used in order to allow patients to
better understand and stay in touch with the feeling of emptiness, in a mind-
ful way, are the following (adapted from Trobe-Krishnananda, 1999):
1. Look over your childhood essential needs. Ask yourself: “Do I have a hole
related to this need?”
2. Then focusing on this particular hole, ask yourself: “How does this hole
affect the way I relate to myself?” and “How does this hole affect the way
I relate to people and life?”
3. Staying with this hole, ask yourself: “How do I feel this hole inside?” and
“Which sensations do I feel right now and where in the body?” Allow
yourself to notice your feelings in this moment and realize how they are,
however, different from you, they aren’t you...breathe with them. Try to
observe them, without judging them, carrying a sense of gentle curiosity
toward that experience. You can approach or recede from these feelings,
and finally try to let them go.
4. Explore your needs: “What thoughts and feelings arise when you con-
sider your needs?” (e.g., “I am weak or needy if I want this” or “I don’ t
feel I have the right to want or need this”). Let’s grant them the possibility
and the necessary time to cross our mind ...; “We accept and are com-
passionate toward these thoughts, realizing that when they were formed,
they certainly made sense and had a function even though we have now
lost them...let’s try to think how much they need us to exist, without
us they don’t have strength or meaning...let’s allow ourselves to observe
and understand them without judging ...”; “Let’s give ourselves permis-
sion to immerse ourselves in our inner experience even though it hurts
and causes pain, breathing together, crossing it and letting it envelop us in
order to reemerge at a certain point...let’s try to observe what happens,
what changes...trusting our experience.”
rWe may also ask the patient to write down, if possible, what beliefs he or
she holds inside about having or expressing these needs.
rAnd eventually may ask: “What were you taught as a child about having
and expressing your needs?” (e.g., “It is selfish to have needs and wants”
and “Men should not have needs and wants”). “Be kind and do not judge
yourself and your own thoughts. There is nothing that you need to do
or not do in this moment. Just stay with yourself and your breath now,
moment by moment ...”.
What Can the Instructor Do
rConsider that sense of pathological emptiness is only the manifes-
tation of a wider range of psychological difficulties of the patient.
According to Teasdale (2004), it is necessary to keep in mind the speci-
ficity of emotional disorders examined as well as some specific interven-
tions likely to help the patient in the effort to modify the processes (apart
from the contents) of his or her own modes of mind. Mindfulness must be
used in an overall therapeutic strategy within a framework of clear under-
standing of the emotional problems of the patient.
146 Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
rShare with the patient a new conceptualization/formulation of his
problem, helping him or her to formulate an alternative vision of the
feeling of emptiness through a cognitive-behavioral model of understand-
ing the functioning of his or her problem. Some mindfulness-based train-
ing, like MBSR, MBCT, or ACT, use homework (ABC, self-monitoring form,
diary, etc.) as a vehicle for explaining the various cognitive processes at
the basis of the disorder and of their functioning modes when they occur.
rWelcome the difficulties of the method reported by patients from
the onset. We need to use the difficulties from the beginning as an oppor-
tunity to teach new attitudes for facing the problems. Relating to the dif-
ficulties with curiosity and interest, trying to accept them rather than
reject them, defines the bases for a mindfulness approach to thoughts
and negative emotions, especially those deriving from experiences of
emptiness.
rShare one’s own experience during the meditative practice, invit-
ing patients to do the same. Segal, Willians, and Teasdale (2002, p. 55)
talk about the approach and attitude of the instructors observed in the
MBSR mindfulness program: “the stance of the instructor was itself ‘invi-
tational’. In addition, there was always the assumption of ‘continuity’
between the experience of instructor and the participants ( ...)”. The
assumption was simple: Different minds work in a similar way, and there
is no reason to discriminate between the mind of the person asking for
help and of the person offering it.
Conti and Semerari (2003) describe sharing in a therapeutic context
as a set of explicit interventions where it is stressed that some aspects
of the patient’s experience are shared or shareable by the therapist him-
self/herself. Sharing interventions include elements of both validation and
self-disclosure. With this technique, in fact, the therapist implicitly vali-
dates the patients’ experience through the acceptance and recognition of
the shared dimension and, in so doing, reveals one’s own mental state.
However, this does in no way imply that the patients should feel forced
to report their own experience. It must be clear that it is a free choice
that does not affect the practice. It is enough to be present and to listen
in order to take part in this intervention.
rEliminate any type of judgment during the practice or the sharing,
and invite patients to do the same. Often, especially at the beginning,
patients tend to judge the “success” of the practice sessions, the positive
or negative changes, their own feelings at the time, or their mental con-
tents. Following the examples and instructions of the leader, they initially
learn not to pass judgment on the experience of others; as the practice
slowly goes ahead, they will acquire the ability not to judge themselves
and their own experience, which is much more complex.
rCommunicate clearly that meditating implies the unconditioned
acceptance of anything arising moment by moment. The first thing
that we can suggest to a patient is to note and record (without judg-
ing himself/herself) during the early experiences with the practice of
mindfulness the moments when he or she would tend to react (or actu-
ally reacts) to the disturbing experience, noticing the type of evalua-
tions that lead to the non-acceptance and to the dysfunctional reactions
as well.
Chapter 8 Mindfulness and Feelings of Emptiness 147
rRefrain from offering solutions or answers. At any time during the
individual or group intervention, patients are simply asked to become
aware of their difficulties and remain in contact with them. The aim is
to promote acceptance, “being” and not “doing”, suggesting the detach-
ment from a reactive way, aiming at getting results and answers to any
problem.
rValidate the patient’s emptiness experience together with all the
elements connected thereto: Validation, according to Linehan (1993),
is a therapeutic strategy consisting in giving value to the subjective expe-
rience of a patient. In particular, it is needed when the individual finds
himself/herself in a self-invalidating state, a mental state where he or she
negatively judges or tries to suppress any aspect of his or her own expe-
rience, considering it dishonorable, wrong, horrible, or unacceptable by
others. In this condition, totally aimed at judging or denying, rather than
at understanding one’s own mental states, the patient is not in a position
to reflect on it in a constructive way. The simple fact of succeeding in shar-
ing one’s own perceptions of the feelings of emptiness, being able to feel
that they are accepted, not receiving any type of judgment while they are
reported, and not feeling pressured to modify or find a solution to them
validates the experience as of itself.
Possible Usefulness and Effects of the Intervention
Clinical observation suggests that a mindfulness-based intervention may help
a patient deal with his/her experience of emptiness in many ways. This
approach might make it possible to
ridentify the prodromes or the early signs of emptiness before it starts, as
well as at-risk situations;
rsucceed in identifying the components of one’s own “emptiness”:
thoughts, physical feelings, emotional states and impulses, acquiring
awareness;
rneutralize the tendency to self-invalidate one’s own experience, develop-
ing the ability to cross one’s own inner state;
rbecome able to remain in that state without exasperating it by activating
secondary emotions (guilt, shame, anger) or with an escalation of anxiety;
raccept being in contact with the experience of emptiness without enact-
ing dysfunctional behavior in order to escape it, also thanks to the aware-
ness of its transience;
rlower the intensity of suffering experienced in the feeling of emptiness
and its frequency;
rsucceed in sharing what patient feels with others and accept their
support.
Summary and Future Directions
The feeling of emptiness may be one of the most difficult psychological phe-
nomena to explain and describe, but it is also not an unusual symptom to
find in both normal and pathological human experience. In this chapter, the
authors have tried to illustrate the state of the art present in the literature
with respect to the clinical problem of emptiness and show how the concept
148 Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
of emptiness is utilized in radically antithetical ways in Western psychology
compared to its meaning in Eastern psychology.
The authors have proposed some hypotheses to explain the possible mech-
anisms of actions of mindfulness with regard to the clinical experience of
emptiness. The potential clinical effectiveness of mindfulness with respect
to feelings of emptiness should mostly be due to exposure to the different
stimuli configuring the aversive experience, usually avoided or suppressed,
most often dysfunctionally. Surely there are also other possible mechanisms
of change in the potential clinical relevance of mindfulness on the feeling of
emptiness. Different meta-cognitive processes are developed and strength-
ened during its use of mindfulness such as detachment or the self-regulation
of attention. Becoming aware of what one really feels inside an experience of
emptiness; identifying emotions, thoughts, and feelings related thereto; man-
aging to observe everything by decentering; and reflecting on one’s own
cognitive functioning and on the consequences of the dysfunctional behav-
ior actually mean improving the meta-cognitive functions implying control-
ling and regulating of one’s own mental states.
Some treatment guidelines have been proposed on pathological empti-
ness, but it is important to stress that these interventions are never a sub-
stitute for an overall psychological therapy for the pathology that is at the
root of the feeling of emptiness. Furthermore, we believe that this type of
intervention must be carried out by therapists expert in the disorder pre-
senting emptiness as a symptom and with a long and regular mindfulness
practice. At the moment there are few studies that have investigated the phe-
nomenological experience of emptiness and there are even fewer that have
certified the effectiveness of the treatments carried out thereon.
Future research is needed to more thoroughly study this clinical phe-
nomenon since it is common to numerous nosographic frames that are
extremely different from one another. The importance of methodologically
sound research in this area cannot be overstated as this could lead to a better
understanding of the activating and maintenance mechanisms of the phe-
nomenon, as well as how therapeutic intervention like mindfulness-based
training, used for the pathology presenting these symptoms, modify and
improve this challenging and disabling experience.
I am tired of being bedridden with the feeling that something must happen.
I don’t understand what is happening to me. I have never been afraid
of the dark: but maybe mine is not fear of the dark. I have exchanged
day for night. At night I open the shutters and I always keep the light
on...during the day I close everything in order to isolate myself from the
thought that everyone is working or doing something. Lately I have started
to go to bed dressed and putting the pillow on top of the blankets for
thickness.
Maybe it is just a habit, I cannot look for a meaning in everything I do. In
so doing, I miss out on so many things that could make me feel alive...Well,
all these thoughts are partly a defense against those feelings of emptiness
that otherwise I would experience. In other words, the truth is that inventing
all these small manias and fears or choosing to live the depression is a more
acceptable way of saying that you do not know what to do with yourself and
your life.
Angela, a 21-year-old depressed patient
Chapter 8 Mindfulness and Feelings of Emptiness 149
References
Aalmas, A. H. (1987). The diamond heart series book 1. Boston: Shambala Publica-
tions.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual
of mental disorders (4th ed., Text Rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
Baer, R. A., (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and
empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 125–143.
Beck, A. T., Freeman, A. et al., (1990). Cognitive therapy of personality disorder.
New York: Guilford.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al.,
(2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Sci-
ence and Practice, 11, 230–241.
Bowlby, J., (1980). Loss. New York: Basic Books
Conti, L., & e Semerari, A., (2003). Linee generali di trattamento dei disturbi della
personalit`
a, In G. Dimaggio & A. e Semerari (Eds.), I disturbi di personalit`
a. Mod-
elli e trattamento. Roma: Editori Laterza (GLF).
Didonna, F. (paper submitted). Mindfulness and its clinical applications for severe
psychological problems: Conceptualization, rationale and hypothesized cognitive
mechanisms of change. Paper submitted to: International Journal of Cognitive
Therapy.
Dimaggio, G., Semerari, A., Falcone, M., Nicol`
o, G., Carcione, A., & Procacci, M.
(2002). Metacognition, states of mind, cognitive biases and interpersonal cycles.
Proposal for an integrated narcissism model. Journal of Psychotherapy Integra-
tion, 12(4), 421–451.
Dimaggio, G., Petrilli, D., Fiore, D., & e Mancioppi, S., (2003). Il disturbo narcisis-
tico di personalit`
a: la malattia della grande vita,InG.Dimaggio&A.eSemer-
ari (Eds.), I disturbi di personalit`
a. Modelli e trattamento. Roma: Editori Lat-
erza (GLF).
Donaldson, E., (2003). Psychological Acceptance: Why every OH/HR practioner
should know about it. Occupational Health Review, 101, 31–33.
DSM-IV, (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (4th ed.).
Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association.
Epstein, M., (1988). The deconstruction of the self: Ego and “egolessness” in Buddhist
insight meditation. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 20(1), 61–69.
Epstein, M., (1989). Forms of emptiness: Psychodynamic, meditative and clinical per-
spectives. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 21(1), 61–71
Fiore, D., & e Semerari, A., (2003). Il disturbo borderline di personalit`
a: il mod-
ello, In G. Dimaggio & A. e Semerari (Eds.), I disturbi di personalit`
a. Modelli e
trattamento. Roma: Editori Laterza (GLF)
Forman, M., (1975). Narcissistic personality disorders and the oedipal fixations.
Annual of Psychoanalysis, 3, 65–92. New York: International Universities Press.
Frankl, V. E. (1963). (I. Lasch, Trans.) Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to
logotherapy. New York: Washington Square Press. (Earlier title, 1959: From Death-
Camp to Existentialism. Originally published in 1946 as Ein Psycholog erlebt das
Konzentrationslager).
Frankl, V. E. (1973). (R. and C. Winston, Trans.) The doctor and the soul: From
psychotherapy to logotherapy. New York: Vintage Books. (Originally published in
1946 as ¨
Arztliche Seelsorge.)
Frankl, V. E. (1975). The unconscious god: Psychotherapy and theology.NewYork:
Simon and Schuster. (Originally published in 1948 as Der unbewusste Gott. Repub-
lished in 1997 as Man’s Search for Ultimate Meaning.)
Gabbard, G. O. (1989). Two subtypes of narcissistic personality disorder. Bulletin of
Meninger clinic, 53, 527–532
150 Fabrizio Didonna and Yolanda Rosillo Gonzalez
Gunderson, J. G., & e Singer, M. T., (1975). Defining borderline patients: an overview.
American Journal of Psychiatry, 132,1–9.
Hayes, S. C., (1994). Content, context and the types of psychological acceptance.
In S. C. Hayes, N. S. Jacobson, V. M. Follette, & M. J. Dougher (Eds.), Acceptance
and change: Content and context in psychotherapy (pp. 13–32), Reno NV: Con-
text Press.
Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K., (1996).
Experiential avoidance and behaviour disorder: A functional dimensional approach
to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64,
1152–1168.
Hazell, C., (2003). The experience of emptiness. Bloomington, IN: 1stBooks.
Horowitz, M. J., (1989). Clinical phenomenology of narcissistic pathology. Psychiatric
Clinic of North America, 12, 531–539.
Jacobson, E., (1964). Theselfandtheobjectworld. New York: International Univer-
sities Press.
Kabat-Zinn, J., (1982). An autpatient program in behavioural medicine for chronic
patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: Theoretical considera-
tions and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4, 33–47.
Kabat-Zinn, J., (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and
mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York: Dell publishing.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2005). Coming to our senses. London: Piatkus Books Ltd.
Kernberg, O., (1975). Borderline conditions and phatological narcissism.
New York: Jason Aronson.
Kohut, H., (1971). The analysis of self. New York: International Universities Press.
Kohut, H., (1977). The restoration of the self. New York: International Universi-
ties Press.
Komito, D. R., (1984). Tibetan Buddhism and psychotherapy: Further conversations
with the Dalai Lama. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 16(1), 1–24.
Laing, R. (1969). The divided self.NewYork:Pantheon.
Leichsenring, F. (2004). Quality of depressive experiences in borderline personality
disorders: Differences between patients with borderline personality disorder and
patients with higher levels of personality organization. Bulletin of the Menninger
Clinic, 68(1), 9–22.
Linehan, M., (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality dis-
order. New York: The Guilford Press.
Maureta Reyes, M. (2007). In Vacio esistencial, un mal contemporaneo. Mejia, R.
www.amapsi.org
May, R. (1950). The meaning of anxiety. New York: Simon and Schuster.
May, R. (1953). Man’s search for himself. New York: Signet Norton.
Medweth, M. HYPERLINK “http://www.jefallbright.net/node/2901” Becoming
Nobody. Department of Psychology. Simon Fraser University. Web site:
http://www.purifymind.com/BecomingNobody.htm
Millon, T. (1996). Disorders of personality. DSM-IV and beyond., New York: John
Wiley & Sons.
Millon, T. (1999). Personality-Guided therapy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Modell, A. H., (1984). Psychoanalysis in a new context. New York: International
University Press.
Pascal, B. (1965). Pensees, Paris: Armand Colin.
Pazzagli, A., & e Monti, M. R., (2000). Dysphoria and aloneness in borderline person-
ality disorder. Psychopathology,33(4), 220–226 July–August.
Rawson, P., (1991). Sacred tibet. London: Thames and Hudson.
Chapter 8 Mindfulness and Feelings of Emptiness 151
Rogers, J. H., Widiger, T. A., & Krupp, A., (1995). Aspects of depression associated
with borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry,152(2),
268–270 February.
Sanavio, E., (1991). Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale. Roma: La Nuova
Italia Scientifica.
Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M., & y Teasdale, J. D., (2002). Mindfulness-based cogni-
tive therapy for depression. A new approach to preventing relapse.NewYork:
Guilford.
Spitzer, R. L., (1975). Crossing the border into borderline personality and border-
line schizophrenia. The development criteria. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36,
17–24
Sunyata (2007). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shunyata
Teasdale, J. D., (2004) Minfulness and the third wave of cognitive-behavioural ther-
apies. Keynote address presented at the 34th Annual Conference of the EABCT,
Manchester, England.
Trobe-Krishnananda, T. (1996). Face to face with fear. Verlag: Koregaon Publications
Trobe-Krishnananda, T. (1999). Stepping out of fear. Verlag: Koregaon Publications.
Wallance, A. B., & e Shapiro, S. L., (2006) Mental balance and well-being: Building
bridges between Buddhism and western psychology. American Psychologist, 61,
690–701.
Wells, A., (1997). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders. Chicester: Wiley.
Wells, A., (2000). Emotional disorders and metacognition: Innovative cognitive
therapy. Chicester: Wiley.
Wells, A., (2002). Gad, metacognition and mindfulness: An information processing
analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 95–100.
Wells, A., (2006). Detached mindfulness in cognitive therapy: a metacognitive analysis
and ten techniques. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Ther-
apy, 3, 337–335.
Westen, D., Moses, M. J., Silk, K. R., Lohr, N. E., Cohen, R., & Segal, H. (1992). Qual-
ity of depressive experiences in borderline personality disorder and major depres-
sion: When depression is not just depression. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6,
382–393.
Winnicott, D. W., (1965a). The maturaional processes and the facilitating environ-
ment.NewYork:IUP.
Winnicott, D. W., (1965b). The family and individual development., London: Tavis-
tock Publications.
Young, J. E., (1987). Schema-focused cognitive therapy for personality disorders.
International cognitive therapy newsletter, 4, 5, 13–14
Young, J. E., & Flanagan, C. (1998). Schema-focused therapy for Narcissistic Patients,
In E. F. Ronninggstam (Ed.), Disorders of narcissism: Diagnostic, clinical, and
empirical implications. New York: American Psychiatric Press.
Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M., (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s
guide. New York: Guilford Publications.