... Ecomorphological studies centered on mammal species have widely pondered cranial variations, both in shape and size, as a proxy for assessing the influences of environmental factors on structuring of phenotypic variation (Carnivora: Bubadué et al., 2016;Schiaffini et al., 2013;Schiaffini, Segura & Prevosti, 2019;Migliorini, Fornel & Kasper, 2020;Artiodactyla: Hendges, Bubadué & Cáceres, 2016;Chiroptera: Marchan-Rivadeneira et al., 2012;Ariosa-Olea & Mancina, 2018;Cingulata: Feijó, Patterson & Cordeiro-Estrela, 2020;Primates: Cardini, Jansson & Elton, 2007;Cardini & Elton, 2008;Cáceres et al., 2014;Didelphimorphia: López-Fuster et al., 2000;Magnus, Machado & Cáceres, 2017;Bubadué et al., 2021). The skull is a key structure that holds most sensory and some food processing organs, whose intraspecific variation frequently mirrors the influence of the clinal or steep environmental gradients (see Pergams & Ashley, 2001;Pergams & Lawler, 2009;Samuels, 2009;Grieco & Rizk, 2010). Rodent cranial variation has been broadly employed as a proxy to study the ecogeographical association and potential drivers of phenotypic variability in landscapes with natural (e.g., Bacigalupe, Iriarte-Díaz & Bozinovic, 2002;Monteiro, Duarte & dos Reis, 2003;Cordero & Epps, 2012;Alvarado-Serrano, Luna & Knowles, 2013;Camargo et al., 2019) or human modified (e.g., Martínez et al., 2014;Yalkovskaya et al., 2016;Caccavo et al., 2021; also see references in Coda et al., 2021) environmental configurations. ...