Ever since the pioneering work of Schaefer (1965), empirical studies have consistently documented the maladjustment correlates of parental psychological control. In particular, it has been shown that psychological control (a characteristic of parents who engage in manipulative and intrusive behaviors towards their children, such as guilt-induction, shaming, and conditional approval) is
... [Show full abstract] consistently related to higher levels of internalizing problems and depressive feelings (Barber & Harmon, 2002). In line with classical thinking about socialization, this positive association between psychological control and depressive feelings has typically been interpreted as a parenting effect. Psychological control is thought to represent a (causal) antecedent factor in the development of depressive feelings. Despite such claims, to date there is limited evidence documenting the direction of effects in the link between psychological control and adolescent adjustment and the few studies that addressed this issue have yielded equivocal results. Accordingly, the central aim of the present study was to examine the nature of the relation between psychological control and adolescents’ depressive feelings by using cross-lagged longitudinal designs with annual assessments of both psychological control and depressive feelings.
Two samples were investigated in order to examine possible age differences in effects of psychological control. Study 1 focused on late adolescents (N = 396; mean age at onset = 18 years and 8 months) and Study 2 covered middle adolescence (N = 679; mean age at onset = 14 years and 11 months). Whereas Study 1 assessed the overall level of perceived psychological control used by both parents, Study 2 included separate assessments of maternal and paternal of psychological control to study the impact of parent gender on the link between perceived psychological control and depressive feelings.
Three models were estimated and compared. A psychological control main-effects model suggests that psychological control exacerbates, rather than simply accompanies adolescents’ negative adjustment. An adolescent adjustment main-effects model on the other hand suggests that poor adjustment in adolescents - and internalizing problems in particular - may be a source of stress for parents, which makes them resort to intrusive parenting. Finally, a reciprocal model was estimated. This model might lend support to transactional models of socialization, which consider developmental outcomes as the product of a continuous dynamic interaction between parents’ and children’s behavior and characteristics.
Careful comparisons of the three models using SEM-analyses with latent factors generally favored the reciprocal model over each of the main-effect models. Study 1 additionally showed that the cross-lagged effects of perceived psychological control remained significant after controlling for parental responsiveness and behavioral control (Figure 1). Study 2 showed that whereas perceived paternal psychological control predicted increases in depressive feelings for male and female middle adolescents, perceived maternal psychological control was only predictive of depressive feelings in male middle adolescents (Figure 2).
We hope to confirm this conclusion of bidirectionality in subsequent analyses that will estimate absolute rather than relative changes in psychological control and depression, for instance using Latent Change Models (Hertzog et al., 2003).