ArticlePDF Available

Global diversity of rotifers (Phylum Rotifera) in freshwater


Abstract and Figures

Rotifera is a Phylum of primary freshwater Metazoa containing two major groups: the heterogonic Monogononta and the exclusively parthenogenetic Bdelloidea. Monogononta contains 1,570 species-level taxa, of which a majority (1,488) are free-living fresh or inland water taxa. Bdelloidea contains 461 “species,” only one of which is marine, but with many limnoterrestrial representatives or animals of unknown ecology. Actual numbers may be much higher, considering the occurrence of cryptic speciation in Monogononta and the unsatisfactory nature of taxonomic knowledge. Rotifers, mostly monogononts, occur in all types of water bodies, worldwide. They are particularly diverse in the littoral zone of stagnant waterbodies with soft, slightly acidic water and under oligo- to mesotrophic conditions. The rotifer record is highest in the Northern hemisphere, which may be due to the concentration of studies in those regions. Diversity is highest in the (sub)tropics; hotspots are northeast North America, tropical South America, Southeast Asia, Australia, and Lake Baikal, endemicity is low in Africa (including Madagascar), Europe, the Indian subcontinent, and Antarctica. Although the lack of fossil evidence and of molecular phylogenetic studies are major hindrances, contrasting hypotheses on the origin and evolutionary history of Brachionus, Macrochaetus, and Trichocerca are presented.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Global diversity of rotifers (Rotifera) in freshwater
Hendrik Segers
ÓSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007
Abstract Rotifera is a Phylum of primary freshwater
Metazoa containing two major groups: the heterogonic
Monogononta and the exclusively parthenogenetic
Bdelloidea. Monogononta contains 1,570 species-
level taxa, of which a majority (1,488) are free-living
fresh or inland water taxa. Bdelloidea contains 461
‘species,’’ only one of which is marine, but with many
limnoterrestrial representatives or animals of unknown
ecology. Actual numbers may be much higher,
considering the occurrence of cryptic speciation in
Monogononta and the unsatisfactory nature of taxo-
nomic knowledge. Rotifers, mostly monogononts,
occur in all types of water bodies, worldwide. They
are particularly diverse in the littoral zone of stagnant
waterbodies with soft, slightly acidic water and under
oligo- to mesotrophic conditions. The rotifer record is
highest in the Northern hemisphere, which may be due
to the concentration of studies in those regions.
Diversity is highest in the (sub)tropics; hotspots are
northeast North America, tropical South America,
Southeast Asia, Australia, and Lake Baikal, endemic-
ity is low in Africa (including Madagascar), Europe,
the Indian subcontinent, and Antarctica. Although the
lack of fossil evidence and of molecular phylogenetic
studies are major hindrances, contrasting hypotheses
on the origin and evolutionary history of Brachionus,
Macrochaetus, and Trichocerca are presented.
Keywords Monogononta Bdelloidea
Freshwater Biodiversity Zoogeography Review
Rotifera (see Wallace et al., 2006 for a recent,
comprehensive introduction to the taxon) is a group
of primary freshwater invertebrates. Rotifers play a
pivotal role in many freshwater ecosystems. They are
ubiquitous, occurring in almost all types of freshwa-
ter habitat, from large permanent lakes to small
temporary puddles, and interstitial and capillary
water; from acidic mining lakes to natron lakes and
the open ocean, from hyperoligotropic Alpine lakes
to sewage ponds. They commonly occur in densities
up to 1,000 individuals per liter, and are important
filter-feeders on algae and bacteria. Their ubiquity
and abundance explain their standing as one of the
three main groups of freshwater zooplankton in
limnological studies, together with the ‘Cladocera’
(Anomopoda) and Copepoda, and as organisms used
in mass aquaculture. They are permanently and
obligatorily connected to aquatic habitats in all active
stages, only their resting stages are drought-resistant.
Guest editors: E. V. Balian, C. Le
ˆque, H. Segers &
K. Martens
Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment
H. Segers (&)
Belgian Biodiversity Platform, Freshwater Laboratory,
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat
29, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:49–59
DOI 10.1007/s10750-007-9003-7
Classically, three groups are recognized within the
Phylum Rotifera. The species-poorest is Seisonacea,
with only three species living epizootically on marine
crustaceans of the genus Nebalia. Most well-known
and diverse are the predominantly freshwater Bdel-
loidea and Monogononta. Molecular studies have
indicated that a fourth group, Acanthocephala, pre-
viously considered a separate Phylum of exclusively
endoparasitic organisms, actually belongs to Rotifera
(Mark Welch, 2000; Giribet et al., 2000). Little is
actually known about the phylogeny of rotifers, due
to a lack of modern comprehensive studies (but see
Sørensen & Giribet, 2006), and the lack of a robust
fossil record.
Rotifers are minute metazoans (50–2,000 lm),
characterized by the presence of an anterior ciliated
corona, a stiff body wall named lorica bearing variable
appendages, and a specialized pharyngeal organ, the
mastax, containing hard elements, termed trophi
(Fig. 1). Especially, the rotifer’s small size, capability
of phenotic plasticity and highly adaptable masticatory
apparatus are important elements explaining the suc-
cess of the group. Their propagules consist of single,
hard-shelled, and durable encapsulated cysts (monog-
ononts) or anhydrobiotic individuals (bdelloids).
These propagules being small and drought-resistant,
makes rotifers perfectly adapted to passive, aerial or
phoretic dispersal. Monogononts and bdelloids repro-
duce parthenogenetically. In monogononts, periods of
parthenogenetic reproduction are interspersed with
sexual phases (heterogony), but bdelloids are unique in
being the most diverse group of metazoans in which
reproduction is by diploid, mitotic parthenogenesis
only. The combination of their high dispersal capacity
and their parthenogenetic reproduction, enabling them
to establish or renew a population starting off from a
single resting stage, and to reach high effective
population sizes relatively quickly, makes them theo-
retically superbly apt (re)colonizers.
The ability of many bdelloids to shift from active to
anhydrobiotic stage enables them to live in particularly
ephemeral, even predominantly dry conditions such as
Fig 1 (a) Schematic
representation of a
Brachionus rotifer; (b)
Incudate trophi
(Asplanchna); (c)
Malleoramate trophi
(Sinantherina). Scale bars:
10 lm
50 Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:49–59
lichens or terrestrial mosses. As such, they should
probably be considered limnoterrestrial rather then
limnetic. Bdelloid rotifers, however, can at present
only be identified while alive and need to be examined
during feeding and creeping. Their study is, conse-
quently, tedious and very little if any information is
available on the ecology of the majority of them. So,
notwithstanding that the present project focuses on
limnetic representatives of these animals, I include
counts of the diversity and distribution of all freshwa-
ter bdelloid taxa, as it is not possible to distinguish
reliably between the two ecological groups.
Biodiversity of Rotifera
Data collection
Data on which the present analysis is based are restricted
to those rotifer taxa that are freshwater or brackishwater
and marine. Exclusively marine species have not been
included but are listed in the electronic appendix
(; see Fontaneto et al., 2006
for a recent review). The taxonomy follows recent tax-
onomic views as expressed in recent revisions of
selected rotifer families (Nogrady et al., 1995; Segers,
1995a,2003;DeSmet,1996; De Smet & Pourriot, 1997;
Nogrady & Segers, 2002), and numerous taxonomic
publications. When alternative taxonomies exist, a
splitting rather than lumping approach was followed.
Species that are insufficiently described and therefore
have to be considered species inquirenda are not
counted. A more complete account on the taxonomic
approach is provided in Segers (2007).
Distributional data are based on the literature review
of De Ridder (1986,1991,1994), De Ridder & Segers
(1997), Segers (1995b,2003) and recent articles (e.g.,
Jersabek, 2003; Ricci et al., 2003). Rare regional
records of species otherwise common in other regions
were critically assessed and eventually included only
after verifications of published illustrations or material.
The data are presented in Segers (2007) and in the
electronic appendix (
Rotifer taxonomy and zoogeography: state
of the art
Before analyzing rotifer diversity and distribution, it
is necessary to give an account on the limitations of
the data. The usual caveat, that new species are still
to be discovered, applies, but there is more. Rotifer
taxonomy is almost exemplary of the taxonomic
impediment, as recognized by governments through
the Convention on Biological Diversity (see
taxonomy/default.shtml). Serious knowledge gaps
exist in the taxonomic system of rotifers and trained
taxonomists and curators are (very) few. These defi-
ciencies have a significant impact on our ability to
understand the diversity and chorology of these ani-
mals. Rotifer taxonomy is all but adequate, an
observation that was already made some 25 years ago
(Dumont, 1980) but which still holds. Basic, detailed
morphological revisions still contribute significantly
to our understanding (e.g., Giri & Jose
´de Paggi,
2006). Molecular studies with an impact on taxon-
omy are still scarce. However, the work by Go
et al. (2002) on the economically important and
particularly well-studied B. plicatilis O.F. Mu
¨ller has
shown that the taxon, which was long treated as a
single but variable species, contains no less then nine
different, phylogenetically distinct lineages. Only few
of these are morphologically diagnosable (see Ciros-
´rez et al., 2001). Such cryptic speciation is proba-
bly common in rotifers, as hinted at by the
reproductive isolation of geographically separated,
yet morphologically identical strains of Asplanchna
brightwellii Gosse (see Snell, 1989). These problems
are further convoluted in bdelloid rotifers. Here, the
difficulties are not only the classic ones hampering
rotifer taxonomy (small size of the animals, scarcity
of useful morphologic features, high variability: see
Ruttner-Kolisko, 1989), but also the practical prob-
lem that, to date, only living and actively moving
animals can be identified or serve as a basis for tax-
onomic study. In addition, the animal’s unique
exclusively parthenogenetic reproduction implies that
most species concepts are inapplicable as theoretical
framework for their study. Clearly, the counts of
rotifer diversity as presented here are tentative and
should be interpreted with great caution.
Due to the caveat mentioned above, and because
identification of rotifers is difficult, rotifer literature is
littered with dubious records. Our knowledge on the
diversity and distribution of rotifers is moreover
biased by the uneven research intensity in different
regions (Dumont, 1983). There are only a few rotifer
families for which a large number of fairly reliable
Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:49–59 51
data is available. These are loricate taxa, which can
mostly be identified using external morphology of
contracted, fixed material, notably Brachionidae:
Pejler (1977) and Dumont (1983), Lecanidae: Segers
(1996), and Trichocercidae: Segers (2003).
Genus- and species-level diversity
A total of 1,570 Monogononta and 461 Bdelloidea
valid species are presently recognized worldwide
(Table 1). Of these, the vast majority (1488 monog-
ononts, 460 bdelloids) are either exclusively
freshwater or brackishwater and marine; only 70
described species are exclusively marine (Table 2).
The most diverse taxa are Notommatidae, with
Cephalodella as most speciose genus, the monogen-
eric Lecanidae, and Dicranophoridae. All of these
contain almost exclusively benthic-littoral or psam-
mon-inhabiting species, with a majority inhabiting
oligo- to mesotrophic, slightly acidic, soft waters.
The same holds for Lepadellidae; Brachionus is a
notable exception, as most of these prefer alkaline
and eutrophic conditions. These preferences are well
known and have been commented upon as early as
Harring & Myers (1928).
Beres et al. (2005) found that the distribution of
genera over families in rotifers is a hollow curve
distribution which fits a model given by Hubbell’s
unified neutral theory of biodiversity (Hubbell, 2001).
Basically, this distribution infers that there are
relatively numerous taxa containing only one or a
few subordinate taxa; that the relative frequency of
taxa decreases sharply with increasing number of
included subordinate taxa, whereas there are only a
few highly diverse taxa (e.g., Lecane: 200 species,
Cephalodella: 159 species). The same seems to hold
for the relation between genera and species in
Monogononta (Fig. 2), however, it is as yet unclear
what this may signify in respect to evolution or
Rotifers, especially monogononts, form a rela-
tively diverse constituent of the fauna of stagnant
freshwater ecosystems. Dumont & Segers (1996)
calculated that a non-polluted lake with developed
weedy littoral would harbour about 150 species in
temperate, and up to 250 species in tropical regions.
This implies that 7.5–12.5% of all species globally,
and ca. one fifth of the regional fauna can be found in
a single locality. Myers’ (1942) intensive studies on
some lakes and ponds in and near the North-
American Pocono region (Pennsylvania) yielded
457 Monogononta and 32 Bdelloidea, which consti-
tute more than half of the known Nearctic rotifer
fauna in a relatively small region. This remarkably
high species diversity, which actually concerns
littoral and benthic rotifers, which are mostly present
in relatively low numbers, can be ascribed to fine
niche partitioning amongst rotifer species in combi-
nation with high micro- and macroscale habitat
heterogeneity, especially in littoral and benthic
environments. On the other hand, local diversity
can represent a sizable fraction of regional diversity.
This is probably a result of the high (re)colonization
and dispersal capacity of rotifers: available niches,
even if these are only temporarily present, are
relatively quickly filled by recruitment from resting
stages that may or may not already be present in the
habitat. This situation may be different from that in
pelagic habitats, where the presence of a large resting
propagule bank produced by locally adapted popula-
tions consisting of large numbers of individuals,
presents an effective barrier against newly invading
genotypes (the Monopolization Hypothesis: De Me-
ester et al., 2002). Alternatively, the observation may
be due to a lack of taxonomic resolution in littoral
Present distribution and main areas of endemicity
The most diverse and, not coincidently, best-studied
region is the Palaearctic, closely followed by the
Nearctic region (Map 1). A substantial research effort
resulting in a relatively high species record has been
devoted to the Neotropical region and, more recently,
the Oriental region. There are a fair number of
contributions on the Australian and Afrotropical
(Ethiopian) regions, but far less on Oceanic islands
(see Wallace et al., (2006) for a literature review).
That research intensity is largely responsible for this
ranking is best illustrated by the regional diversity of
taxonomically difficult illoricate taxa such as Dicr-
anophoridae and Notommatidae: the diversity of
these in the best studied Palaearctic and Nearctic
regions, where most rotifer taxonomists live(d), is
almost 7- to 8-fold that of the least studied African
region; this is much less so for the relatively easier
loricate taxa such as Brachionidae and Lecanidae.
52 Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:49–59
Antarctica is a special case; there are quite a few
studies but here rotifer diversity is markedly and
effectively lower then in other regions (Fig. 3).
Endemicity at higher taxonomic levels is rare in
rotifers. There is a single endemic free-living rotifer
family, the Nearctic (northeast North American)
Table 1 Number of genera per family, per region
Number of genera Palearctic Afrotropical Australian Oriental Nearctic Neotropical Antarctic Pacific Total
Asciaporrectidae 1 1 1
Asplanchnidae 3 2 2 3 3 3 1 3
Atrochidae 3 1 2 3 2 1 3
Birgeidae 1 1
Brachionidae 7 7 6 7 7 7 3 1 7
Collothecidae 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2
Conochilidae 1 1 2 1 2 1 2
Dicranophoridae 14 5 8 5 12 6 2 5 19
Epiphanidae 5 4 5 5 5 3 2 4 5
Euchlanidae 4 4 4 5 4 4 1 2 5
Flosculariidae 7 6 7 6 7 7 1 4 7
Gastropodidae 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Hexarthridae 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Ituridae 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Lecanidae 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Lepadellidae 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 3 4
Lindiidae 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Microcodidae 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mytilinidae 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2
Notommatidae 15 9 11 9 15 10 3 5 18
Proalidae 4 3 3 2 4 3 3 4
Scaridiidae 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Synchaetidae 3 3 3 3 4 3 2 4
Testudinellidae 2 2 2 3 2 2 1 3
Tetrasiphonidae 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Trichocercidae 3 2 3 3 3 2 1 2 3
Trichotriidae 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3
Trochosphaeridae 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 3
Subtotal: 94 70 80 78 94 76 23 40 108
Adinetidae 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
Habrotrochidae 3 3 3 1 3 2 1 2 3
Philodinavidae 3 1 2 1 2 2 3
Philodinidae 11 10 10 6 9 9 4 4 12
Subtotal: 19 15 16 9 15 15 6 7 20
Total: 113 85 96 87 109 91 29 47 128
Total number of species includes exclusively marine taxa, not included are Clariaidae (1 species, Claria segmentata Kutikova,
Markevich & Spiridonov, 1990), and 3 Seisonacea.
Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:49–59 53
Table 2 Number of species-level taxa per family, per biogegraphic region
PA NA NT AT OL AU PAC ANT End. Cosmo. World Mar.
Asciaporrectidae 3 2 0 00000 1 0 3
Asplanchnidae 11 11 10 9 12 9 2 0 2 8 15
Atrochidae 4 2 1 13200 0 1 4
Birgeidae 0 1 0 00000 1 0 1
Brachionidae 94 66 71 51 57 58 4 16 94 36 169 1
Brachionus 32 23 32 26 33 34 3 5 29 20 63
Keratella 21 22 18 15 12 15 0 5 26 7 48
Notholca 3113832206 27 2 401
Collothecidae 42 18 15 14 8 12 2 2 24 10 47
Conochilidae 5 7 5 55600 1 5 7
137 93 21 19 15 24 5 6 98 9 181 39
Dicranophorus 36 38 10 12 8 8 1 0 21 7 52 1
Encentrum 6428324615 54 1 7831
Epiphanidae 16 10 10 99842 4 9 16
Euchlanidae 19 18 14 15 15 18 3 2 8 11 27
Flosculariidae 35 38 37 22 23 30 5 2 7 19 50
Gastropodidae 10 7 8 86700 2 6 12
Hexarthridae 11 11 7 84630 7 4 18
Ituridae 4 4 4 23500 0 2 6
Lecanidae 93 108 94 82 99 61 30 2 81 49 200
Lepadellidae 95 67 70 54 59 55 18 11 81 37 160 3
Lepadella 66 42 52 39 42 41 11 7 70 25 122 2
Lindiidae 7 11 4 23721 4 3 133
Microcodidae 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Mytilinidae 21 10 14 12 12 12 1 2 13 8 29
Notommatidae 201 165 70 29 48 72 11 11 149 45 277
Cephalodella 118 79 37 6 26 31 14 8 93 16 159
Notommata 29 36 12 10 8 14 6 1 25 10 47
Proalidae 34 34 7 10 7 14 5 0 20 6 47 9
Scaridiidae 3 3 4 44311 3 2 7
Synchaetidae 38 26 18 13 15 17 3 0 16 12 45 12
Testudinellidae 19 19 19 18 15 17 1 0 19 9 40 1
Tetrasiphonidae 1 1 1 11100 0 1 1
Trichocercidae 50 53 45 39 41 43 18 4 13 34 70 2
Trichotriidae 13 11 15 12 11 10 1 0 10 9 23
Trochosphaeridae 13 8 1 13 10 13 0 0 5 9 19
Subtotal 980 805 566 453 486 511 119 63 663 345 1488 70
Adinetidae 17 8 6 7 5 12 1 6 7 5 20
Habrotrochidae 130 25 37 45 18 53 7 7 75 14 152
Habrotrocha 108 22 33 39 18 44 6 7 64 13 128
Philodinavidae 3 2 2 12200 3 0 6
Philodinidae 220 77 71 85 33 109 6 15 152 41 282 1
54 Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:49–59
Birgeidae. A number of endemic genera exist: In the
Palaearctic these are Pseudoharringia, the psammo-
biotic Wigrella, the European Alpine Glaciera and
the Baikalian Inflatana; in the Nearctic (northeast
North American) Rousseletia and the littoral
Streptognatha, and, probably, Pseudoploesoma (the
appurtenance of P. greeni Koste to this genus is
doubtful: De Smet & Segers, unpublished); in the
Oriental region Pseudoeuchlanis and Anchitestudinella;
and the Subantarctic (Kerguelen Island) Pourriotia.The
biogeographical relevance of these is, however, low:
all but Wigrella are monospecific, many (Glaciera,
Inflatana, Pseudoeuchlanis, Anchitestudinella and
Pourriotia) have only been found once. The fate of
Dorria is revealing: this monospecific genus was long
considered a rare northeast North American endemic
taxon, until it was found in southern Australia
and on Hawaii (Jersabek, 2003). More reliable, also
taxonomically, are Birgeidae, Streptognatha and
Pseudoploesoma; all three of these are northeast North
American. This concurs with the main center of
endemicity of Trichocercidae (Segers, 2003).
Endemic species occur in all regions and in all but
the species-poorest rotifer genera and families. The
count of endemics in Table 2, however, underrepre-
sents endemicity and complexity of the distributions
of rotifers: quite a few species technically occur in
more than one biogeographical region as accepted for
this study, yet are clearly restricted to a circumscribed
area (e.g., Keratella kostei Paggi occurs in Patagonia,
the Falkland Islands and South Georgia Island hence
both in the Neotropical and Antarctic region) or have
far more restricted ranges (e.g., the numerous Baika-
lian endemics, mostly of Notholca). Lecanidae is a
0 50 100 150 2 00
areneg fo rebmun
2ot 3
t 7
t 23 o63
4 127
species per genus
areneg fo rebmun
Fig 2 Distribution of rotifer species diversity over different
genera. (a) normal representation, (b) number of species
(x-axis) sorted out in octaves
Table 2 continued
PA NA NT AT OL AU PAC ANT End. Cosmo. World Mar.
Macrotrachela 75 19 22 31 11 41 3 7 50 14 95
Mniobia 41 11 10 5 0 21 2 29 249
Philodina 35 17 14 24 6 18 1 5 28 10 50
Subtotal 370 112 116 138 58 176 14 28 237 60 460 1
Total 1,350 917 682 591 544 687 133 91 900 405 1948 71
PA: Palaearctic; NA: Nearctic; NT: Neotropical; AT: Afrotropical; OL: Oriental; AU: Australasian; PAC: Pacific Oceanic Islands;
ANT: Antarctic. End. = Endemics, Cosmo. = Cosmopolites, Mar. = Marine
Excluding Clariaidae, a monospecific family of exclusively parasitic animals living in terrestrial Oligochaeta
Excluding Albertia (4 species) and Balatro (7species), exclusively endoparasitic in Oligochaeta (both) and gastropods (Albertia);
Endemics: present in one region only
Cosmopolites: present in 5 or more regions
Marine: exclusively marine species
Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:49–59 55
good illustration of the diversity of distribution
patterns (Segers, 1996). Since this 1996 paper, over
30 Lecane have been added as valid, either as a result
of the application of a less inclusive taxonomic
concept or by the description of new species. In
general, ranges of Lecane have been refined and
counts of regional endemicity increased, notwith-
standing that some range extensions have been
reported. Lecanidae species are predominantly
(sub)tropical or warm-water, with numerous regional
and local endemics, and some Holarctic, Palaeotrop-
ical, Australasian, New World, and Old World taxa
illustrating more complex patterns.
Also Brachionidae contains taxa with well-docu-
mented ranges (see Pejler, 1977; Dumont, 1983). An
update on the distribution of some Brachionidae is as
Of the eight species considered valid here, four are
regional endemics. Whereas A. cristata Be¯ rzin¸s
A. miracleae Koste and A. urawensis Sudzuki are
rare, taxonomically difficult and may have been
overlooked, the two Neotropical taxa (A. quadrian-
tennata (Koste) and A. sioli Koste are meaningful, as
they are unmistakable and have been recorded
repeatedly. As all Anuraeopsis species are warm-
water animals, and as the only reliable endemics are
Neotropical, it can be hypothesized that the taxon
may be of Neotropical origin.
This species-rich and predominantly warm-water
genus contains 29 endemic (sub)species, most of
which are Neotropical (9) or Australian (7). There are
only three Oriental, and one Afrotropical endemics.
Three taxa are American but probably of Neotropical
origin (B. havanaensis Rousselet, B. satanicus
Rousselet and B. zahniseri Ahlstrom). Brachionus
dichotomus reductus Koste & Shiel is Australasian
and most likely of Australian origin, by its relation
with the Australian B. dichotomus dichotomus Shep-
hard. Most of the Neotropical and Australian
endemics are phylogenetically and taxonomically
distinct. This is much less clear for the Palaearctic
and Nearctic endemics, most of which are clear
relativesof the B. plicatilis complex (B. asplanchnoides,
B. ibericus,B. spatiosus).The emerging pattern is one of
centered endemicity in South America and Australia,
with hardly any endemicity in Africa and the Northern
hemisphere. Such a pattern may hint at a late Cretaceous
South American-Antarctic-Australian (see Hay et al.,
1999), rather than a Gondwanan (Dumont, 1983)origin
of the taxon.
Fig 3 Rotifer diversity in
the major biogeographic
regions. Number of species/
number of genera. Upper:
Monogononta, Lower:
AT—Afrotropical ;
PAC—Pacific Oceanic
Islands; ANT—Antarctic
56 Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:49–59
Within Brachionidae, Keratella is the genus with the
highest degree of endemicity (52%), and this may
even be an underestimate considering the confused
taxonomy of a number of species complexes like
Keratella cochlearis. Endemicity is high in the
Eastern Palearctic (K. mongoliana Segers & Rong,
K. sinensis Segers & Wang, K. trapezoida Zhuge &
Huang, K. wangi Zhuge & Huang and K. zhugeae
Segers & Rong) and Northern Nearctic (K. armadura
Stemberger, K. canadensis Be¯rzin¸s
ˇ,K. crassa
Ahlstrom, K. taurocephala Myers). Here, a Southern
hemisphere cold-water faunal component is repre-
sented by K. kostei Paggi, K. sancta Russell
(New Zealand, Kerguelen, Macquarie Island) and
K. reducta (Huber-Pestalozzi) (Cape region, South
Africa), amongst others. Considering the relatively
small area of southern hemisphere temperate regions,
these taxa balance the northern hemisphere tem-
perate Keratella fauna. In addition, there are some
reliable Australian (e.g., K. australis Be¯rzin¸s
Oriental (K. edmondsoni Ahlstrom), and warm-water
Neotropical (K. nhamundaiensis Koste) endemics, as
well as Palaeotropical (K. javana Hauer) and Holarctic
(K. hiemalis Carlin) taxa. In contrast to Brachionus,
no clear general pattern emerges in Keratella.
Another remarkable genus is Macrochaetus.It
contains 6 endemics out of 13 species, 4 of which are
Neotropical. Three of these are clearly distinct and
quite primitive in lacking the elongate dorsal spines
typical of the genus. Hence, also Macrochaetus
could be Neotropical in origin. The surmised origin
of Brachionus and Macrochaetus contrasts with
Trichocerca, in which a northern hemisphere pre-
Pleistocene origin, followed by glacial extinctions in
the (west) Palearctic, was postulated to account for an
observed lack of endemics in the tropics versus high
endemicity in northeast North America (Segers,
Clearly, and notwithstanding the unsatisfactory
nature of our knowledge of their taxonomy, rotifers
do exhibit complex and fascinating patterns of
diversity and distribution as illustrated in a number
of contributions (Green, 1972; Pejler, 1977;De
Ridder, 1981; Dumont, 1983; Segers, 1996,2003).
In summary, many species are cosmopolitan, either or
not exhibiting latitudinal variation as a result of
temperature preferences. Regional differences may
result from environmental conditions such as water
chemistry. Endemism is real and occurs at diverse
geographical scales; more complex patterns exist.
Rotifer diversity is highest in the tropics, with
endemicity centered in tropical South America and
Australia; tropical Africa including Madagascar and
the Indian subcontinent are notable for their relatively
poor rotifer fauna including few endemics. Hotspots
occur in northeast North America, Australia (proba-
bly west Australia) and, in contrast to the low
endemicity on the Indian subcontinent, Southeast
Asia. On a more local scale, Lake Baikal is most
noteworthy by its high endemicity; much less is
known of other ancient lakes. (Harring & Myers,
1928; Green, 1972; Pejler, 1977, Dumont, 1983;
Segers, 1996,2001,2003). The remarkable rotifer
diversity in northeast North America, in contrast to
the low endemicity in European waters is attributed
to the presence of glacial refugia in the region during
the Pleistocene, at least for Trichocerca (Segers,
Fenchel & Finlay (2004) postulated that small-
sized organisms (\1 mm) tend to have a cosmopol-
itan distribution as a consequence of huge absolute
population sizes. At the local scale, their diversity
exceeds that of larger organisms yet at the global
scale this relation is reversed because endemism is
largely responsible for the species richness of large-
sized taxa. A latitudinal diversity gradient is absent or
weak. Monogonont rotifers appear to comply with
this pattern: their local diversity is relatively high
compared to the total species diversity of the group,
and cosmopolitanism is important. On the other hand,
a latitudinal diversity gradient is clearly evident in
rotifers (e.g., Green, 1972). Two factors may account
for this apparent contradiction: first, the statement
that all rotifer resting stages are eminently suited for
dispersal may not be correct. Such a generalization is
contradicted by the abundance of well-documented
cases of locally endemic rotifers. Second, the
monopolizing effect of large resting propagule banks
may counteract successful colonization.
Human-related issues
Rotifer distribution and diversity is largely influenced
in two ways. The most important is that of the decline
of the water quality in freshwater ecosystems. As
Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:49–59 57
mentioned above, the most diverse rotifer assem-
blages can be found in soft, slightly acidic, oligo- to
mesotrophic waters. These are particularly vulnerable
to eutrophication and salinization. Regarding water
pollution by pesticides, there are numerous laboratory
studies on rotifer ecotoxicology, even using rotifers
as test organisms for ecotoxicological assessments.
The effects of pollutants on rotifer diversity in nature
also has been studied. Rotifers are often less sensitive
to insecticides than cladocerans and their sensitivity
to specific compounds varies widely. They also
exhibit indirect effects from exposure to toxicants,
e.g., through reduction of competition from more
sensitive organisms or cascading food web effects
(see Wallace et al., 2006).
Due to the large dispersal and colonization capac-
ities of many species, rotifers are easily transported to
new habitats by man. An illustrative case is that of
Filinia camasecla Myers, 1938, which was described
from the Panama Canal zone; however, the species
has subsequently never been found back in the
Americas, but has been shown to be a relatively
common Oriental species. Several additional
instances are known of rotifers being introduced to
regions where they did not naturally occur before
(e.g., Dartnall, 2005; see Wallace et al., 2006). This
phenomenon may have been going on for a long time
(see Pejler, 1977) and may be responsible for isolated
records of regionally common species outside their
natural range. It may, however, have passed unno-
ticed because of the small size of rotifers and dearth
of comprehensive studies. The same reasons explain
why rotifers have hardly been used in biodiversity
assessments and conservation, notwithstanding their
economic relevance in aquaculture.
Beres, K. A., R. L. Wallace & H. H. Segers, 2005. Rotifers
and Hubbell’s unified neutral theory of Biodiversity
and Biogeography. Natural Resource Modeling 18(3):
´rez, J., A. Go
´mez & M. Serra, 2001. On the taxonomy
of three sympatric sibling species of the Brachionus
plicatilis (Rotifera) complex from Spain, with the
description of B. ibericus n. sp. Journal of Plankton
Research 23: 1311–1328.
Dartnall, H. J. G., 2005. Are Antarctic planktonic rotifers
anthropogenic introductions? Quekett Journal of Micros-
copy 40: 137–143.
De Meester, L., A. Go
´mez, B. Okamura & K. Schwenk, 2002.
The monopolization hypothesis and the dispersal-gene
flow paradox in aquatic organisms. Acta Oecologica 23:
De Ridder, M., 1981. Some considerations on the geographical
distribution of rotifers. Hydrobiologia 85: 209–225.
De Ridder, M., 1986. Annotated checklist of non-marine
Rotifera from African inland waters. Koninklijk Museum
voor Miden Afrika, Tervuren, Zoologische Documentatie
21: 123 pp.
De Ridder, M., 1991. Additions to the ‘‘Annotated checklist of
non-marine rotifers from African inland waters’’. Revue
d’Hydrobiologie tropicale 24(1): 25–46.
De Ridder, M., 1994. Additions II to the ‘‘Annotated checklist
of non-marine rotifers from African inland waters’’. Bio-
logisch Jaarboek Dodonaea 61: 99–153.
De Ridder, M. & H. Segers, 1997. Rotifera Monogononta in six
zoogeographical regions after publications between 1960
and 1992. Studiedocumenten van het Koninklijk Belgisch
Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen 88: 481 pp.
De Smet, W. H., 1996. Rotifera 4: The Proalidae (Monog-
ononta). In Nogrady T., & H. J. Dumont (eds), Guides to
the identification of the microinvertebrates of the conti-
nental waters of the World 9. SPB Academic, The Hague,
The Netherlands.
De Smet, W. H. & R. Pourriot, 1997. Rotifera 5: The Dicr-
anophoridae (Monogononta) and the Ituridae
(Monogononta). In Nogrady T., & H. J. Dumont (eds),
Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of
the Continental Waters of the World 12. SPB Academic,
The Hague, The Netherlands.
Dumont, H. J., 1980. Workshop on taxonomy and Biogeog-
raphy. Hydrobiologia 73: 205–206.
Dumont, H. J., 1983. Biogeography of rotifers. Hydrobiologia
104: 19–30.
Dumont, H. & H. Segers, 1996. Estimating lacustrine zoo-
plankton species richness and complementarity.
Hydrobiologia 341: 125–132.
Fenchel, T. & B. J. Finlay, 2004. The ubiquity of small species:
patterns of local and global diversity. Bioscience 54:
Fontaneto, D., W. H. De Smet & C. Ricci, 2006. Rotifers in
saltwater environments, re-evaluation of an inconspicuous
taxon. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the
United Kingdom 86: 623–656.
Giri, F. & S. Jose
´de Paggi, 2006. Geometric morphometric and
biometric analysis for the systematic elucidation of
Brachionus caudatus Barrois and Daday, 1894 (Rotifera
Monogononta Brachionidae) forms. Zoologischer Anzei-
ger 244: 171–180.
Giribet, G., D. L. Distel, M. Polz, W. Sterrer & W. C. Wheeler,
2000. Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the
acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cyc-
liophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: a combined
approach of 18S rRNA sequences and morphology. Sys-
tematic Biology 49: 539–562.
´mez, A., M. Serra, G. R. Carvalho & D. H. Lunt, 2002.
Speciation in ancient cryptic species complexes: evidence
from the molecular phylogeny of Brachionus plicatilis
(Rotifera). Evolution 56: 1431–1445.
58 Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:49–59
Green, J. J., 1972. Latitudinal variation in associations of
planktonic Rotifera. Journal of Zoology, London 167:
Harring, H. K. & F. J. Myers, 1928. The rotifer fauna of
Wisconsin. IV. The Dicranophorinae. Transactions of the
Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters 23:
Hay, W. W., R. M. DeConto, C. N. Wold, K. M. Wilson, S.
Voigt, M. Schulz, A. R. Wold, W.-C. Dullo, A. B. Ronov,
A. N. Balukhovsky & E. So
¨ding, 1999. Alternative
global Cretaceous paleogeography. In: Barrera, E. &
C. C. Johnson (eds), Evolution of the Cretaceous ocean-
climate system. Geological Society of America Special
Paper 332: 1–47.
Hubbell, S. P., 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodi-
versity and Biogeography. Monographs in Population
Biology 32. Princeton University press, Princeton and
Jersabek, C. D., 2003. Freshwater Rotifera (Monogononta)
from Hawai’i—a preliminary checklist. In: Evenhuis, N. L.
& L. G. Eldredge (eds), Records of the Hawaii Biological
Survey for 2001–2002—Part II: Notes. Bishop Museum
occasional papers 74: 46–72.
Mark Welch, D. B., 2000. Evidence from a protein-coding
gene that acanthocephalans are rotifers. Invertebrate
Biology 119: 17–26.
Myers, F. J., 1942. The rotatorian fauna of the Pocono Plateau
and environs. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural
Sciences of Philadelphia 44: 251–285, 3 plates.
Nogrady, T., R. Pourriot & H. Segers, 1995. Rotifera 3: The
Notommatidae and The Scaridiidae. In Nogrady T. &
H. J. Dumont (eds), Guides to the Identification of the
Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the
World 8. SPB Academic, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Nogrady, T., & H. Segers (eds), 2002. Rotifera 6; The As-
planchnidae, Gastropodidae, Lindiidae, Microcodinidae,
Synchaetidae, Trochosphaeridae. In Dumont, H. J. (ed.),
Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of
the Continental Waters of the World 18. Backhuys Pub-
lishers BV, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Pejler, B., 1977. On the global distribution of the family
Brachionidae (Rotatoria). Archiv fu
¨r Hydrobiologie,
Beihefte 8: 212–220.
Ruttner-Kolisko, A., 1989. Problems in taxonomy of rotifers,
exemplified by the Filinia longiseta – terminalis complex.
Hydrobiologia 186/187: 291–298.
Ricci, C., R. Shiel, D. Fontaneto & G. Melone, 2003. Bdelloid
rotifers recorded from Australia with description of
Philodinavus aussiensis n.sp. Zoologischer Anzeiger 242:
Segers, H., 1995a. Rotifera 2. The Lecanidae (Monogononta).
In Nogrady T. & H.J. Dumont (eds), Guides to the Iden-
tification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental
Waters of the World 6. SPB Academic, The Hague, The
Segers, H., 1995b. World records of Lecanidae (Rotifera:
Monogononta). Studiedocumenten van het Koninklijk
Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen 81: 114 pp.
Segers, H., 1996. The biogeography of littoral Lecane Rotifera.
Hydrobiologia 323: 169–197.
Segers, H., 2001. Zoogeography of the Southeast Asian
Rotifera. Hydrobiologia 446/447: 233–246.
Segers, H., 2003. A biogeographical analysis of rotifers of
the genus Trichocerca Lamarck, 1801 (Trichocercidae,
Monogononta, Rotifera), with notes on taxonomy.
Hydrobiologia 500: 113–114.
Segers, H., 2007. A global checklist of the rotifers (Phylum
Rotifera). Zootaxa 1564: 1–104.
Snell, T. W., 1989. Systematics, reproductive isolation and
species boundaries in monogonont rotifers. Hydrobiologia
186/187: 299–310.
Sørensen, M. V. & G. Giribet, 2006. A modern approach to
rotiferan phylogeny: Combining morphological and
molecular data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
40: 585–608.
Wallace, R. L., T. W. Snell, C. Ricci, & T. Nogrady, 2006.
Rotifera vol. 1: biology, ecology and systematics (2nd
edition). In Segers H., & H. J. Dumont (eds), Guides to the
Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental
Waters of the World, 23. Kenobi Productions, Gent,
Belgium and Backhuys Academic Publishing BV. The
Hague, The Netherlands.
Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:49–59 59
... Monogonont rotifers, one of the most abundant groups of aquatic invertebrates, play a pivotal role in nutrient recycling and the transfer of energy in many freshwater ecosystems (Bonecker & Aoyagui, 2005). This class of rotifers includes 1,570 named species-level taxa but the actual numbers may be much higher given the occurrence of cryptic species and the unsatisfactory nature of rotifer taxonomy (Segers, 2008). Morphology may not be sufficient to differentiate among monogonont species due to phenotypic plasticity, resulting from predator-induced defenses, producing morphological variation within a single species (Gilbert, 2001;Wallace, 2002). ...
... Genetic analyses of the best-investigated monogonont rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis Müller, 1786, initially suggested the existence of 14-16 species across three clades (Suatoni et al., 2006), and a more recent study has indicated that this species complex contains at least 15 genetically divergent species (Mills et al., 2017). Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas, 1766, long believed to be a single cosmopolitan species (Segers, 2008), similarly hosts much cryptic diversity and is now regarded as a species complex (e.g. Gilbert & Walsh, 2005;Xiang et al., 2011b;Garcia-Morales & Elias-Gutierrez, 2013;Papakostas et al., 2016). ...
Full-text available
The diversity and distribution of freshwater rotifers have been under-explored in China, especially from high altitude regions. We used molecular data to explore these points in the monogonont rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus species complex across China, covering both the low- and high-altitude regions. Populations of this species complex were detected in 44 of the 251 waterbodies sampled across China. Analysis of partial sequences of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS-1) placed these populations in four distinct species (B. dorcas, B. elevatus, B. calyciflorus sensu stricto (s.s.) and B. fernandoi), and phylogenies based on sequences from a portion of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene recognized seven groups within the B. calyciflorus species complex in China. The four species were congruent with the four morphogroups that we identified. All four species were present in the Eastern Plain and B. dorcas occurred nowhere else. Brachionus elevatus and B. calyciflorus s.s. were the only species present in the Northeast Plain and in the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, respectively. Cases of mito-nuclear discordance were detected in our specimens, suggesting occasional hybridization between different species of the B. calyciflorus species complex. Our results revealed the phylogeography and gene introgression in this species complex across China.
... Phylum Rotifera (sensu stricto) is a large phylum of microscopic animals found mainly in freshwaters [14,15] containing two major groups: Subclass Monogononta and Subclass Bdelloidea [16,17]. As components of the base of the food web, rotifers shape community energy flow linking the classical food web with the microbial loop; as a result, these micrometazoans are very import in the functioning of aquatic ecosystems [18,19]. ...
Full-text available
Biodiversity records are recognized as important for both diversity conservation and ecological studies under the light of global threats faced by aquatic ecosystems. Here, the checklist of Greek rotifer species is presented based on a literature review, as well as current data from 38 inland water bodies. A total of 172 Monogononta rotifer species were recorded to belong to 21 families and 44 genera. The most diverse genera were Lecane, Brachionus, and Trichocerca, accounting for 34% of the recorded species. Trichocerca similis, Brachionus angularis, Filinia longiseta, Asplanchna priodonta, Keratella tecta, Keratella quadrata, and Keratella cochlearis were the most frequent species with a high frequency of occurrence over 60%, with K. cochlearis being the most frequently recorded (86%). Furthermore, we used rarefaction indices, and the potential richness was estimated at 264 taxa. More sampling efforts aiming at littoral species, as well as different habitats such as temporary pools, ponds, and rivers, are expected to increase the known rotifer fauna in Greece. We expect that additional molecular analyses will be needed to clarify the members of species complexes, likely providing additional species.
... Individuals in the phylum Rotifera are ubiquitous in freshwater (Segers, 2008;Wallace et al., 2015) and can be the numerically dominant zooplankton in lakes and reservoirs (Hillbricht-Ilkowska, 1983;Mazumder et al., 1992;Rodríguez & Matsumura-Tundisi, 2000;Li et al., 2017). Yet, rotifers are generally under-represented in zooplankton feeding studies, especially in relation to cyanobacteria blooms, in part due to the challenge of sampling them in ways that accurately assess their abundance, composition, and feeding without body damage (Orcutt & Pace, 1984;James, 1991;Muirhead et al., 2006;Chick et al., 2010;Thomas et al., 2017). ...
Full-text available
Grazing by microzooplankton has been shown to significantly impact freshwater cyanobacteria blooms; however, the contribution of rotifers to the overall effect of microzooplankton grazing is not well understood. We conducted monthly microzooplankton community grazing (dilution) experiments June–October 2019, concurrent with incubations of field-collected rotifers feeding upon the natural assemblage of microplankton prey < 75 µm in Vancouver Lake (Washington State, USA), a lake annually affected by cyanobacteria blooms. Our results showed that just days after a large bloom, the microzooplankton community grazing impact on phytoplankton biomass was exceptionally high (> 1000% d⁻¹), yet the impact by rotifers was low (< 1% d⁻¹). As the bloom diminished in September and October, the grazing impact of rotifers increased dramatically, specifically consuming substantial dinoflagellate (≤ 574%) and ciliate (≤ 382%) biomass daily. Analysis of rotifers in Vancouver Lake during these months showed the presence of large, carnivorous Asplanchna spp., which indicates multi-trophic grazing dynamics within the rotifer assemblage. We conclude that non-rotifer micro-grazers (i.e., ciliates) were likely responsible for the initial dissipation of cyanobacteria just after the bloom peak, while rotifers primarily removed micro-grazers later in autumn. This study highlights the trophic roles of micro-grazers in controlling harmful cyanobacteria blooms and quantifies the specific grazing contributions of rotifers.
... During this period, aquatic connectivity is enhanced, facilitating the movement of passive dispersers via watercourses (De Bie et al., 2012;Frisch et al., 2012), mainly r-strategists that have short life cycles, asexual reproduction, and strong propagule pressure, such as rotifers. The lack of difference in beta diversity between natural lakes and artificial reservoirs, and the lower beta diversity values, reflect the broad dispersal capacity of rotifers (Beisner et al., 2006;Segers, 2007;Chase et al., 2011), in accordance with our third hypothesis. ...
Full-text available
Anthropogenic stressors on aquatic environments change the relative importance of environmental conditions on spatial species distributions in a regional pool. One way to assess the spatial species distribution is measure the beta diversity. This study analyzed the difference in zooplankton beta diversity between natural lakes and artificial reservoirs, to understand whether reservoirs affect beta diversity, and the relative importance of deterministic processes for the spatial distribution of species. We measured beta diversity using Raup-Crick dissimilarity and analyzed the relative impact of environmental filters on beta diversity in 30 reservoirs and 29 shallow lakes located in Brazil, during two seasons (dry and rainy period). Rotifer beta diversity did not differ between lakes and reservoirs, while copepod beta diversity was higher in reservoirs. Environmental filters were important during the dry period for both lakes and reservoirs, indicating that deterministic processes could drive beta diversity during that season. Environmental productivity, estimated by chlorophyll-a, was associated with zooplankton beta diversity in lakes and reservoirs. The spatial turnover of zooplankton communities depended on the biological characteristics of zooplankton groups, and their responses to environmental filters.
... It has a central role in the aquatic ecosystems' dynamics, especially in nutrient cycling and energy flow, linking producers and higher consumers (Gliwicz and Pijanowska, 1989), and acting as a structuring force on the phytoplankton community (Mccauley and Briand, 1979). In freshwater, the zooplankton is mainly composed of rotifers, cladocerans and copepods, and it can be exceptionally diverse considering the taxa among these groups (Boxshall and Defaye, 2007;Forró et al., 2008;Segers, 2007). Zooplanktonic species also vary reasonably in their functional traits and the traits associated with trophic group, grazing mode and body size are considered keys to understand ecosystem processes including nutrient cycling (Litchman et al., 2013) and community assembly (Setubal, Sodré, et al., 2020). ...
We characterized the functional and taxonomic composition of the active and dormant communities from perennial lagoons and temporary ponds in a coastal plain. We sought to determine the degree of coherence between the egg bank and the active community within the same type of environment (temporary or perennial) and between environments subject to different hydrological cycles. We sampled the zooplankton community and environmental variables in six temporary ponds and five perennial lagoons in the dry and the wet periods of the hydrological cycle. Temporary ponds and perennial lagoons differed in abiotic conditions, with higher values of dissolved carbon in temporary ponds and higher values of salinity in perennial lagoons. The taxonomic coherence between active and dormant communities in temporary environments was greater than in perennial environments. In functional terms, we observed a high coherence between active and dormant communities for both types of environments. Our results highlight the need to conserve both temporary and perennial environments to assure the maintenance of zooplankton diversity. Although these environments are subject to the same set of climatic variables and pool of species, their idiosyncrasies are important forces promoting and sustaining biological diversity.
While pollution due to nano- and micro-sized plastics (NMPs) and hypoxic conditions both occur in coastal areas, the deleterious potential of co-exposure to hypoxia and NMPs (hypoxia and micro-sized plastics, HMPs; hypoxia and nano-sized plastics, HNPs) is largely unclear. Here, we provide evidence for multigenerational effects of HMP and HNP in the marine rotifer Brachionus plicatilis by investigating changes in its life traits, antioxidant system, and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathway using an orthogonal experimental design, with nanoscale and microscale particles measuring 0.05 μm and 6.0 μm in diameter, respectively, and hypoxic conditions of 0.5 mg/L for six generations. Combined exposure to NMPs and hypoxia caused a significant decrease in fecundity and overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The HIF pathway and circadian clock genes were also significantly upregulated in response to HMP and HNP exposure. In particular, synergistic and deleterious effects of HNP were evident, suggesting that size-dependent toxicity can be a major driver of the effects of hypoxia and NMP co-exposure. After several generations of exposure, ROS levels returned to basal levels and transcriptomic resilience was observed, although rotifer reproduction remained suppressed. These findings help elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in responses to plastic pollution in hypoxic conditions.
Full-text available
Genetic differentiations and phylogeographical patterns of small organisms may be shaped by spatial isolation, environmental gradients, and gene flow. However, knowledge about genetic differentiation of rotifers at the intercontinental scale is still limited. Polyarthra dolichoptera and P. vulgaris are cosmopolitan rotifers that are tolerant to environmental changes, offering an excellent model to address the research gap. Here, we investigated the populations in Southeastern China and eastern North America and evaluated the phylogeographical patterns from their geographical range sizes, geographic-genetic distance relationships and their responses to spatial-environmental factors. Using the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene as the DNA marker, we analyzed a total of 170 individuals. Our results showed that some putative cryptic species, also known as entities were widely distributed, but most of them were limited to single areas. The divergence of P. dolichoptera and P. vulgaris indicated that gene flow between continents was limited while that within each continent was stronger. Oceanographic barriers do affect the phylogeographic pattern of rotifers in continental waters and serve to maintain genetic diversity in nature. The genetic distance of P. dolichoptera and P. vulgaris populations showed significant positive correlation with geographic distance. This might be due to the combined effects of habitat heterogeneity, long-distance colonization, and oceanographic barriers. Furthermore, at the intercontinental scale, spatial distance had a stronger influence than environmental variables on the genetic differentiations of both populations. Wind- and animal-mediated transport and even historical events of continental plate tectonics are potential factors for phylogeography of cosmopolitan rotifers.
The biogeography and molecular phylogeny of invertebrate zooplankton populations from inland saline waters remains under-explored in the Eastern Palearctic, especially the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Here, we surveyed the diversity of the Brachionus plicatilis Müller, 1786 species complex from inland saline waters across China. We compared morphometrics with DNA taxonomy (using two genetic markers: the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene and the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS-1)). Our phylogenies based on the sequences of ITS-1 recognized two distinct clades (i.e. two species: B. plicatilis sensu stricto (s.s.) and B. asplanchnoidis) in China. We detected two mitochondrial clades within B. plicatilis s.s and one within B. asplanchnoidis across China, consistent with the three morphogroups present. One of these three clades was novel and restricted to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, where it exhibited evidence of recent expansion across the region. The new mitochondrial clade fell within B. plicatilis s.s. but was sister to all other mitochondrial sequences of that species, suggesting a period of isolation from other populations. Moreover, significant morphological differences were identified: B. plicatilis s.s. from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau had a larger lorica length and width than did members of this species from lowland China. Our data demonstrate the successful adaptation of this species complex to the harsh environment of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.
Geologic origins and climatic factors have affected the degree of isolation and ages of habitats so that new species evolved in many different types of inland waters. Today these rivers, lakes and wetlands support a disproportionate number of all the described species on earth relative to the size of surface-water habitats. This concentration of diversity resulted in part because of many periods of isolation and changes in hydrology. Endemic species evolved and adapted to distinct habitats in response to specific environmental conditions and biotic interactions. However, concentrations of endemic species increase the risk of extinctions so that the loss of inland aquatic species is accelerating at faster rates than in marine or terrestrial ecosystems. Some of the most diverse groups of aquatic organisms illustrate general patterns of biodiversity that influence food webs and ecosystem processes. Biodiversity indices are also used to monitor water quality to inform management. Despite increased research over the last several decades, many species remain to be discovered and most life histories and ecological relationships are incompletely known.
Body size is sensitive to environmental changes and one of the fundamental traits linking ecological functions. Size structure has been suggested as a useful indicator for environmental monitoring and assessment in aquatic ecosystems. However, the organisms’ size structure and the relationship with environmental factors remain seldom addressed in reservoir ecosystems. In this study, we investigated the size spectrum, size diversity of the zooplankton and their relationships with environmental conditions across nitrogen and phosphorus gradients in the Xiangxi Bay of Three Gorges Reservoir, China. We further tested the hypotheses that how nutrient and water temperature affect zooplankton size structure: nutrients indirectly affect zooplankton size spectrum and size diversity via phytoplankton (H1); increasing water temperature will reduce size diversity and result in a steeper size spectrum (H2); size diversity is a more robust metric indicating environment changes than the size spectrum in high dynamic ecosystems (H3). We found that both the size spectrum and size diversity showed high spatiotemporal dynamics. The size spectrum ranged from −3.373 to −0.984. The size diversity ranged from 0.631 to 3.291. Spatially, the lowest values of the size spectrum and size diversity were observed in the upstream areas of Xiangxi Bay, where nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations are high and low, respectively. And in temporal dynamics, lower values of the size spectrum and size diversity were generally observed in March and April. Further analyses based on the structural equation model (SEM) found a clear pathway revealing that nutrient variables affect the zooplankton abundance and size structure, supporting hypothesis H1. That is, dissolved inorganic nitrogen had an indirect effect on the zooplankton abundance, size spectrum, and size diversity by influencing the concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll a . In addition, results of SEM suggested that increased water temperature had a significant negative effect on the size diversity but had non-significant effects on zooplankton abundance and size spectrum. This finding suggests that size diversity is a reliable and useful index in measuring the zooplankton size structure in reservoir ecosystems with high dynamics, which may have a wide application in environmental monitoring and assessment, especially for complex and dynamic aquatic ecosystems.
Full-text available
The biogeography of rotifers is discussed in light of general biogeographical concepts. It is argued that, in spite of considerable abilities for passive dispersal, vicariance can develop well in this group. Examples selected from the Brachionidae illustrate the high levels of endemicity found in Australia and South America, while the Indian subcontinent and Africa have a predominantly cosmopolitan fauna. An explanation for these patterns is found in drifting continents and Pleistocene climatic changes.
Full-text available
Triploblastic relationships were examined in the light of molecular and morphological evidence. Representatives for all triploblastic “phyla” (except Loricifera) were represented by both sources of phylogenetic data. The 18S ribosomal (rDNA) sequence data for 145 terminal taxa and 276 morphological characters coded for 36 supraspecific taxa were combined in a total evidence regime to determine the most consistent picture of triploblastic relationships for these data. Only triploblastic taxa are used to avoid rooting with distant outgroups, which seems to happen because of the extreme distance that separates diploblastic from triploblastic taxa according to the 18S rDNA data. Multiple phylogenetic analyses performed with variable analysis parameters yield largely inconsistent results for certain groups such as Chaetognatha, Acoela, and Nemertodermatida. A normalized incongruence length metric is used to assay the relative merit of the multiple analyses. The combined analysis having the least character incongruence yields the following scheme of relationships of four main clades: (1) Deuterostomia [((Echinodermata + Enteropneusta) (Cephalochordata (Urochordata + Vertebrata)))]; (2) Ecdysozoa [(((Priapulida + Kinorhyncha) (Nematoda + Nematomorpha)) ((Onychophora + Tardigrada) Arthropoda))]; (3) Trochozoa [((Phoronida + Brachiopoda) (Entoprocta (Nemertea (Sipuncula (Mollusca (Pogonophora (Echiura + Annelida)))))))]; and (4) Platyzoa [((Gnathostomulida (Cycliophora + Syndermata)) (Gastrotricha + Plathelminthes))]. Chaetognatha, Nemertodermatida, and Bryozoa cannot be assigned to any one of these four groups. For the first time, a data analysis recognizes a clade of acoelomates, the Platyzoa (sensu Cavalier-Smith, Biol. Rev. 73:203–266, 1998). Other relationships that corroborate some morphological analyses are the existence of a clade that groups Gnathostomulida + Syndermata (= Gnathifera), which is expanded to include the enigmatic phylum Cycliophora, as sister group to Syndermata.
Full-text available
The species concept in Rotifers, as in many other animal groups, is applied by various investigations in a rather lax way. Separation of species is often based on ad hoc criteria, such as the structure of the lorica; there is, as yet, insufficient insight into the contribution of morphology to reproduce isolation, or to avoidance of interspecific competition. An exception is the structure of the mastax; if habitat partitioning through selective feeding is occurring within rotifers, one should indeed expect this structure to show high morphological specificity. However, the same holds true for the corona, which has been little studied, and also for the various receptors found on the head region, and sometimes elsewhere on the body.
Full-text available
Rotifers are microscopic aquatic animals that comprise more than 1800 species. Most rotifer species live in freshwater and limno-terrestrial habitats, while thalassic environments (brackish+seawater) are thought to host few species. No recent review of saline rotifers is available. Here we report the results of a review of the literature concerning rotifers from saline environments, distinguished into three categories: stenohaline, euryhaline, and haloxenous, and found both in truly marine habitats and/or in inland saline waters. A total of about 200 studies, mentioning fully identified rotifers from saline waters, allowed us to list as many as 443 rotifer taxa at either specific, subspecific and infrasubspecific rank, corresponding to 391 nominal species. Truly thalassic taxa, not found in inland saline waters only, accounted for 289, including the 'stenohaline' (143) and the euryhaline (146) ones. As for freshwaters, the majority of the thalassic rotifers inhabit the psammon, or display a benthic-periphytic way of life, while the plankton likewise is less species rich and less abundant. The geographical distribution of the brackish and marine rotifers largely reflects the distribution of rotifer investigators, therefore, no biogeographical analysis can be performed yet. In conclusion, the analysis of literature citing rotifers in salt waters, uncovers an unexpected rotifer fauna: the apparent richness of the group in thalassic environments is worthy of being addressed by further investigations, as many species have been reported only by their description, suggesting either considerable endemism or taxonomic errors.
study of the issue indicates that it is not a serious problem for neutral theory, for reasons we discuss below. First, a bit of background. Hubbell (2001) derived the analytical expression for the stochastic mean and variance of the abundance of a single arbitrary species in a neutral community undergoing immigration from a metacommunity source area. However, his approach did not lend itself to an analytical solution for the distribution of relative species abundance (RSA) in a multispecies community for community sizes larger than a handful of individuals. As a result, all of Hubbell's RSA distributions for local communities were based on simulations. This problem was solved by Volkov et al. (2003), who derived an analytical expression for the RSA distribution in local communities of arbitrary size. However, as Chisholm and Burgman noted, there is sometimes a difference between some of the simulation-based results of Hubbell and the analytical results of Volkov et al. (2003). Chisholm and Burgman computed Volkov's equation and resimulated Hubbell's results for the four cases
Taxonomy of the genus Brachionus (Brachionidae) poses problems common to many members of Rotifera. Like other genera, Brachionus includes species showing a remarkable phenotypic plasticity. Biometric and geometric morphometric analyses were applied to re-evaluate the taxonomic status of two of its morphological forms, Brachionus caudatus “f”. ahlstromi and Brachionus caudatus “f”. austrogenitus using specimens collected in different aquatic environments of the floodplain of the Paraná River. The biometric analysis was based on the measurement of the anterior width, maximum width and body length. Fourteen landmarks were considered for the geometric morphometric analysis. The biometric analysis (using the t-test) revealed significant differences (p0.0001) in the dimensions of all three variables. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) of geometric morphometric data also showed that these morphs were significantly different (p0.0001). These results provide substantial evidence to consider both morphs as separate taxonomic entities.
The validity of taxonomical categories in parthenogenic groups is discussed. Special problems of rotifer taxonomy are caused by: facultative or obligatory parthenogenic reproduction, high morphological and genetic variability and paucity of morphological characteristics. Examples of these problems are provided by the Filinia terminalis-longiseta group. The different ecological properties of various populations belonging to this group are emphasized. Suggestions concerning the creation of new taxa are made; in particular, the importance of using ecological data is stressed.