Content uploaded by Patricia Colunga-GarciaMarin
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Patricia Colunga-GarciaMarin
Content may be subject to copyright.
Distillation in Western Mesoamerica before European Contact
1
DANIEL ZIZUMBO-VILLARREAL
2
, FERNANDO GONZÁLEZ-ZOZAYA
3
,
ANGELES OLAY-BARRIENTOS
3
, LAURA ALMENDROS-LÓPEZ
3
,
PATRICIA FLORES-PÉREZ
2
,AND PATRICIA COLUNGA-GARCÍAMARÍN*
,2
2
Unidad de Recursos Naturales, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Calle 43 No 130, Col.
Chuburná de Hidalgo, Mérida, Yucatán, México 97200
3
Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Centro INAH Colima. Vicente Guerrero No 174, Col.
Centro, Colima, Colima, México 28000
*Corresponding author; e-mail: patricia.colunga@gmail.com
Distillation in Western Mesoamerica before European Contact. Fermented beverages are
almost universal among ancient human societies. Ethanol is an analgesic, disinfectant, and
mind-altering substance, and can help to preserve and enhance the nutritional value of food.
Fermentation has therefore played a key role in human cultural and technological development.
In Mesoamerica, codices and colonial-era sources describe a variety of fermented beverages
produced before European contact. Distilled beverages, in contrast, have not been invented in all
cultures, and their production in pre-contact Mesoamerica remains controversial. We tested the
hypothesis of Needham et al. (1980) that Capacha gourd and trifid vessels described by Kelly
(1974) for the Early Formative (1500–1000 BCE) in Colima state, western Mexico, could have
been used to produce distilled beverages. Experiments using vessel replicas, techniques, and
materials (including agave ferment) available in this region during this period successfully
produced ethanol-containing distillates. We propose the possible origin and development of a
“Capacha-type Mesoamerican still”from bean pots or from steamer pots used during this
period, and discuss the possible production of spirits as part of the prevailing agricultural and
cultural system. Average gourd and trifid vessel sizes, their archaeological context, and the eth-
anol yields of the replicas suggest that, if used as stills, they were used to produce a prestige
product for ceremonial purposes, with high social and cultural relevance.
Destilación en el Occidente de Mesoamérica Antes del Contacto Europeo. Las bebidas
fermentadas son casi universales entre las sociedades humanas antiguas. El etanol es una sustancia
analgésica, desinfectante y alteradora de la conciencia, y puede ayudar a preservar e incrementar el
valor nutritivo de los alimentos. La fermentación, por tanto, ha jugado un papel clave en el
desarrollo cultural y tecnológico de la humanidad. En Mesoamerica, los códices y las fuentes de la
época colonial describen una variedad de bebidas fermentadas producidas antes del contacto con
los europeos. Las bebidas destiladas, en contraste, no se han inventado en todas las culturas, y su
producción enla Mesoamérica pre-Hispánica permance controversial. En este trabajo probamos la
hipótesis de Needham et al. (1980) de que las vasijas Capacha tipo bule y trífidas descritas por
Kelly (1974) para el Formativo Temprano (1500–1000 antes de Cristo [A.C.]) en el estado de
Colima, en el occidente de México, pudieron haber sido usadas para producir bebidas destiladas.
Los experimentos, usando réplicas de vasijas, técnicas y materiales (incluyendo el fermento de
agave) disponibles en la región durante ese periodo, resultaron exitosos para producir destilados
conteniendo etanol. Proponemos el posible origen y desarrollo de un “Destilador Mesoamericano
tipo Capacha”a partir de las ollas frijoleras o de las ollas vaporeras que se usaban en ese período,
y discutimos la possible producción de bebidas destiladas como parte del sistema agrícola y
cultural. Las dimensiones promedio de las vasijas tipo bule y trífidas reportadas, su contexto
arqueológico, y los rendimientos de etanol obtenidos experimentalmente con las réplicas,
sugieren que, si se usaron como destiladores, lo fueron para elaborar un producto suntuario con
fines ceremoniales, con alta relevancia social y cultural.
1
Received 12 March 2009; accepted 10 November
2009; published online ___________.
Economic Botany, XX(X), 2009, pp. 1–14.
© 2009, by The New York Botanical Garden Press, Bronx, NY 10458-5126 U.S.A.
Key Words: Agave, Capacha, Chinese and Mongol-type stills, distillation, early formative,
gourd-shaped vessels, Mesoamerica, stirrup vessels, Western Mexico.
Introduction
Production and use of fermented alcoholic
beverages is almost universal among ancient human
societies, which discovered how to make them from
sugar sources available in their local habitats.
Ethanol can function as an analgesic, disinfectant,
and mind-altering substance. Additionally, fermen-
tation helps to preserve and enhance the nutritional
value of food and beverages. Because of these
properties, fermented beverages have played a vital
role in human cultural and technological develop-
ment, contributing to the advancement and inten-
sification of agriculture and food-processing
techniques. The oldest fermented beverage has been
documented for China at about 7,000 years BCE
(McGovern et al. 2004).
In Mesoamerica, pre-European contact codices
and Spanish colonial sources document a variety of
fermented beverages produced before contact using
different portions of native plant species: Agave spp.
inflorescence sap and “heads”(stems with attached
leaf bases), corn grain and stalks (Zea mays L.),
cactus fruit (Opuntia spp., Stenocereus sp.), hog
plum fruits (Spondias spp.), mesquite fruits (Prosopis
spp.), and balché bark (Lonchocarpus longistylis
Pittier), among others (Bruman 1940; Godoy et
al. 2003; Gonçalves de Lima 1986).
In western Mesoamerica, aboriginal fermented
alcoholic drinks were derived mainly from agaves
and hog plum (Bruman 1940,2000). Archaeo-
logical evidence clearly indicates the importance
of agaves as food for Mesoamerican peoples,
probably since 8750±350 BCE (Flannery 1986;
Smith 1986). Their cultural relevance in ancient
western Mexico as food, fiber, and fermented
beverage is documented since at least the Late
Formative (300 BCE to CE 100) (Benz et al. 2006;
Butterwick 2000; Schöndube 2000; Valdez 2000;
Zizumbo-Villarreal et al. 2009a). The ethnohis-
toric data demonstrate the continued economic
and cultural significance of agaves and, at present,
the production of agave spirits (known as mezcals,
the most famous being tequila) is highly relevant in
western Mexico (Colunga-GarcíaMarín and
Zizumbo-Villarreal 2007).
Unlike fermented beverages, distilled beverages
were not invented in all cultures. Distilling
requires a technique for separating ethanol from
water by exploiting ethanol’s lower boiling point
(78.4°C) or melting point (−114.3°C). This
allows production of beverages with an alcohol
content greater than 15%, the natural limit of
fermented beverages. The techniques that take
advantage of ethanol’s lower boiling point involve
four basic steps: (1) ferment production, using a
natural sugar or starch source easily converted (e.g.,
by cooking) to a sugar; (2) ethanol evaporation,
accomplished by boiling the ferment itself or boiling
water to allow the steam to pass through a
fermented mash; (3) ethanol condensation, allow-
ing the ethanol vapors to contact a cold surface,
usually a recipient cooled with water changed
frequently or continuously (because ethanol has a
lower boiling point, its vapor condenses before
water vapor); and (4) ethanol collection.
The invention and development of spirits
distillation have been comprehensively studied
in China and the Middle East. After examining
the available evidence, Huang (2000) proposed
that distillation in China was probably first
attained during the Eastern Han period (CE
25–220 ). In the Middle East, wine distillation
and alcohol isolation are clearly described by the
8th and 9th centuries (al-Hassan 2002).
The presence of distilled beverages in Mesoamer-
ica before European contact in 1521 is controver-
sial. In the late 19th century, Bourke (1893) and
Lumholtz (1902) suggested that distillation had
developed before contact based on their findings
that several cultures in western Mexico (Coras,
Huichols, Nahuatls in Jalisco state, and Puré-
pechas) produced agave spirits using a very simple
still, clearly different from the Arab-type, intro-
duced by the Spanish in the 16th Century.
Bruman (1944) disagreed and proposed that these
simple stills were derivatives of those introduced by
Filipinos to the Colima region in the late 16th
century for making coconut (Cocos nucifera L.)
spirits. He based his proposal on their similarity to
East Asian stills described by Feliciano (1926) and
regional use of the Tagalog-origin word tuba (the
Filipino term for fermented coconut beverage) to
refer to fermented agave juice. Zizumbo-Villarreal
and Colunga-GarcíaMarín (2008) provided sup-
plemental evidence supporting Bruman’s proposal.
ECONOMIC BOTANY [VOL
Needham et al. (1980:109) and Needham and
Lu (1985:50–59) seconded the theory that
distillation in Mesoamerica may have originated
before European contact. Their proposal was
based on the similarity between the gourd and
stirrup vessels which characterize the Capacha
phase of the Early Formative period (1500–1000
BCE) in Colima state (western Mexico) as
described by Kelly (1974,1980) and pottery
steamers they postulate as predecessors to Chinese
stills (Mongol and Chinese type). In East Asia,
Chinese pottery steamers are found in the
archaeological record beginning in Neolithic
times and were characteristic cooking utensils in
the Shang and Zhou periods (1600–221 BCE).
These authors observe that if a small catch bowl
(recipient) were set on the grating of a Chinese
steamer or in the center of the upper body of a
Capacha period vessel, and a bowl of cold water
(i.e., condenser) placed over the mouth of either
vessel type, it mimics the Mongol-type still
arrangement. They hypothesize that this was very
probably the origin of the Chinese still, which
they support by the fact that the perennial
Chinese term for distillation is chêng liu, i.e.,
“steaming”(Needham et al. 1980:81, 96, 97,
109; Needham and Lu 1985:50–59).
Kelly (1974,1980) described the gourd pot
(bule) as a vessel with a central constriction
resembling a Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl.
fruit, the origin of its common name. She
described the stirrup pot as a compound vessel
connected by two (bifid) or three tubes (trifid)
with a stirrup-shaped mouth. Gourd pots are
more characteristic of the Capacha phase, and
bifid vessels the least common. Both gourd and
stirrup pots are recorded as offerings in simple
burials grouped in cemeteries, in association with
hemispheric bowls (called tecomates due to their
similarity to traditional bowls made with gourds
or Crescentia cujete L. fruits), miniature cups, and
single-body pots (ollas).
Commonly known in the region as bean pots,
these single-body pots are the simplest of the
vessels in these assemblages and the only form still
used in the region. As their name indicates, they
are used to cook beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in
water. While the beans are boiling at a low
temperature in the pot, a clay bowl (similar to a
tecomate) or a smaller pot containing water is
placed on top of the main pot. In what is referred
to as the “water cover”method, probably in use
since at least the Early Formative (Mountjoy
2006), the water inside the covering vessel warms,
is poured into the main pot, and then the smaller
vessel filled again with fresh water.
The present study objective was to test the
hypothesis of Needham et al. (1980:109) and
Needham and Lu (1985:50–57) that Capacha
gourd and trifid vessels described by Kelly (1974,
1980) for the Early Formative period (1500–
1000 BCE) in Colima (western Mexico) could be
used to produce distilled beverages. Employing
the elements and techniques most probably
available during this period, including agave
ferment, we successfully produced an ethanol-
containing liquid. We discuss the possible origin
and evolution of the “Capacha-type Mesoamer-
ican still”from bean pots or from steamer pots,
also used in that time, within the context of the
prevailing agricultural and cultural system. Based
on average reported gourd or trifid vessel sizes,
their archaeological context, and the ethanol
yields produced with replicas in this study, it is
probable that, if used as stills, they were used to
produce a prestigious product for ceremonial
purposes with high social and cultural relevance.
Methodology
ASSEMBLY OF EXPERIMENTAL “CAPACHA-TYPE
MESOAMERICAN STILLS”
To test the hypothesis that the vessel types
described above could have been used to distill
ethanol, replicas of original trifid and gourd-
shaped vessels were made based on specimens on
display in the National Museum of Anthropology
and History (MNA) in Mexico City (Vela
2005:64) and the Museum of Colima Regional
History (MCRH) (Fig. 1). Four still assemblies
were used in the experiments (Fig. 2): trifid and
gourd-shaped stills with ceramic condensers and
recipients (TSC and GSC), and trifid and gourd-
shaped stills with gourd (L. siceraria) condensers
and recipients (TSG and GSG). The ceramic
condensers and recipients were replicas based on a
hemispheric bowl (tecomate) described by Kelly
(1980:59, Fig. 12d) and a miniature cup shown
in Townsend (2000:133). Gourd fruit pericarp is
a material used for container production in
Mesoamerica for thousands of years (Erickson et
al. 2005). Distillate recipients were placed in the
upper reservoir of the trifid vessels, and held in
place with agave fiber in the gourd-shaped vessels
(Fig. 2). Condensers were sealed with clay to
prevent vapor leaks.
ZIZUMBO-VILLARREAL ET AL: DISTILLATION IN WESTERN MESOAMERICA2009]
All ceramic replicas were made with clay
from the foothills surrounding the Valley of
Colima. Pieces were fired at low temperatures
in an open-air wood oven. They were also
pretreated to prevent liquids from undermining
the matrix. This pretreatment consisted of a
traditional system in which clay vessels are
boiled slowly for an hour in nijayote, the
residual water produced during the traditional
nixtamal process of cooking corn grain in a lime
and water solution before grinding into a dough
to make tortillas. Processing of corn by this
method in Mesoamerica dates to at least 1500–
1200 BCE (Coe 1994).
SIMULATION OF ANCIENT DISTILLATION METHOD
Under the assumption that the traditional
method currently used to cook beans in western
Mexico has been in use at least since the appearance
of gourd and trifid vessels during the Capacha
period in thisregion, we used a procedure similar to
that for cooking beans for the distillation experi-
ment, and, as a reference, we cooked 0.5 kg of the
local “Flor de Mayo”bean variety in 1 L of water in
a bean-pot replica at the same time the experimental
stills were being tested.
The still assemblies were prepared by filling
each with 1 L of agave ferment (locally known as
Fig. 1. (A) Original trifid and (B) gourd-shaped vessels from the Capacha cultural phase (1500–1000 BCE) of
Colima, Mexico, replicated for the experiments. National Museum of Anthropology and History, Mexico City
(Vela 2005:64) and Museum of Colima Regional History. (A´ and B´) Replicated vessels (31 cm tall x 16 cm wide
and 34 cm high x 20 cm wide).
ECONOMIC BOTANY [VOL
tuba), a raw material very probably available
during the Capacha phase. Ferment was prepared
by the master traditional mezcal producer Mac-
ario Partida from Zapotitlán, Jalisco state (see
Colunga-GarcíaMarín and Zizumbo-Villarreal
2007). The bean pot was a replica of one on
display in the Caxitlán Archaeological Museum
(CAM), and the top bowl was a clay dish or a
bowl of gourd fruit pericarp (Figs. 3and 4). The
water in the bean pot and ferment in the still
assemblies were heated over a stone fire pit with
wood as fuel (Fig. 4). We were measuring the
water temperature in the bean pot, and when it
began to evaporate (approximately 75°C to 80°C),
heating temperature was lowered for all the vessels
to maintain evaporation constant. One liter of fresh
water was placed in the still condensers and in the
bean-pot top bowl. When top bowl water temper-
ature surpassed 40°C, it was poured into the bean
pot and replaced with water at 20°C. Water in the
condensers was kept at less than 27°C by replace-
ment with water at 20°C.
Traditional cooking time for beans in ceramic
bean pots is approximately two hours, which is
when the distillation process was stopped. The
distillates were then collected and taken to the
Fig. 2. Assembling of the four experimental “Capacha-type Mesoamerican stills”using replicas of trifid (TS) and
gourd-shape (GS) vessels from the Capacha cultural phase (1500–1000 BCE) of Colima, Mexico. (TSC and GSC)
using ceramic condensers and recipients that are replicas of an hemispheric bowl describedby Kelly (1980:59, Fig. 12d)
and a miniature cup shown in Townsend (2000:133). (TSG and GSG) using condensers and recipients made with
gourd (L. siceraria) fruit pericarp. Distillate recipients were placed in the upper reservoir of the trifid vessels, and held
in place with agave fiber in the gourd-shaped vessels. All condensers were sealed with clay to prevent vapor leaks.
ZIZUMBO-VILLARREAL ET AL: DISTILLATION IN WESTERN MESOAMERICA2009]
laboratory to measure distillate yield (mL/L) and
ethanol concentration (g/L and % [v/v]). The
experiments were done from 18 to 20 September
and 3 to 9 December 2008, with the assistance of
Margarita Nava (65 years old), an expert in
traditional bean cooking methods, and the master
mezcal producers Apolinar Partida (85), Macario
Partida (68), and Miguel Partida (28).
Fig. 3. (A) Original “bean pot”from the Capacha cultural phase (1500–1000 BCE) of Colima, Mexico,
replicated for the experiments. Caxitlán Archaeological Museum, Colima. (B) Replicate pot (14.5 cm tall x 18 cm
wide x 24.5 cm mouth).
Fig. 4. Simulation of ancient distillation method using the trifid and gourd-shaped experimental stills. (A)
Building a stone firepit using burning wood. (B) Using ceramic accessories. (C) Using gourd (L. siceraria) acces-
sories. (D) Scoring of temperatures in the bean pot as a reference.
ECONOMIC BOTANY [VOL
DISTILLATION UNDER CONTROLLED HEATING
CONDITIONS
Wood fires produce extremely variable heating
conditions. To control for this variability in the
simulation of traditional distillation methods, we
repeated the experiments using the same materials
and procedures, but using a gas stove as heat
source. Five replicates were done for each of the
four still assemblies. Distillate yield (mL/L) and
ethanol concentration (g/L and % [v/v]) were
measured. Ethanol production efficiency was
calculated as the amount of ethanol obtained in g/L
of ferment during the 2-hour distillation period.
DISTILLATE ETHANOL CONTENT
Ethanol concentration was measured using the
potassium dichromate method (Williams and Reese
1950), which chemically quantifies ethanol by
complete oxidation with potassium dichromate in
the presence of sulfuric acid to produce acetic acid
and the reduced chromic product Cr
2
O
72
(Cáceres-Farfán et al. 2008). The calibration
curves (ethanol concentration/absorbance) were
calculated in a range of 0.2–2.0 g/L with
anhydrous absolute ethylic alcohol. Readings to
generate the curves and evaluate the samples were
taken using a spectrophotometer (Beckman Model
DU65) at 550 nm. A simple linear model (y = mx)
was applied with the REG procedure in the SAS
statistical software (SAS 1992) and produced a
value of m = 18.85 (R
2
= 0.997, p=0.001).
Ethanol production was also calculated as a
percentage (v/v) of ethanol based on the density
of the anhydrous ethylic alcohol (0.79 g/mL).
VESSEL SIZE AND FERMENT CAPACITY
To estimate mean spirit production potential
for the studied vessels, height, width, and mouth
diameter were estimated for the seven trifid and
ten gourd vessels reported by Kelly (1980).
Measurements were also taken of 20 gourd vessels
on display in regional museums: the MCRH
(Fig. 5), the State Capitol Museum (SCM), and
the CAM (Fig. 6).
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Comparisons between the four still assemblies
in terms of distillate yield, ethanol concentration,
and distillation efficiency were done with a one-
way ANOVA and a Tukey’s means separation
Fig. 5. Gourd-shaped vessels from the Capacha cultural phase (1500–1000 BCE) of Colima, Mexico on
display in the Museum of Colima Regional History.
ZIZUMBO-VILLARREAL ET AL: DISTILLATION IN WESTERN MESOAMERICA2009]
test (α= 0.05). A comparison among the trifid
and gourd vessel dimensions reported by Kelly
(1980) and those in the Colima museums was
done with the GLM procedure and a Tukey’s
means separation test (α= 0.05). All statistical
analyses were run using the SAS program (1992).
Results
SIMULATION OF ANCIENT DISTILLATION
CONDITIONS
After two hours at low heat, the GSC produced
72 mL distillate with an ethanol concentration of
162.1 g/L (20.5% v/v); the GSG produced
47 mL with a concentration of 202.2 g/L
(35.5% v/v); the TSC produced 112 mL with a
concentration of 93.9 g/L (12% v/v); and the
TSG produced 44 mL with a concentration of
237 g/L (32% v/v).
DISTILLATION UNDER CONTROLLED HEATING
CONDITIONS
Average distillate yield in the 20 replicates was
49.5 mL/L (range: 16–85 mL/L), with an average
ethanol concentration of 160.3 g/L (range: 93.9–
255.4 g/L), 20.5 % v/v (range: 12–32 %), and an
average efficiency of 7.8 g ethanol/liter ferment/
2 h (range: 2.9–17.1). No differences were
observed between the four still assemblies for
these variables under these conditions (Table 1).
VESSEL DIMENSIONS
The gourd vessels reported by Kelly (1980) did
not have significant differences from those dis-
played in the regional museums, and both had
significantly larger height, width, and mouth
diameter than the trifid vessel (Table 2).
Discussion
The distillate volumes and ethanol concen-
trations produced experimentally with the
gourd and trifid vessels, when assembled
following the Mongol-type still arrangement,
confirm that distillation is possible with these
vessels, as predicted by Needham et al.
(1980:109) and Needham and Lu (1985:50–
59). All the materials and procedures used in the
experiments were, or could have been, contem-
poraneous to the Capacha vessels, suggesting the
real possibility that distillation occurred in the
Valley of Colima region in the Early Formative
(1500–1000 BCE).
General average ethanol content (20.5 % v/v)
was within the range of distilled beverages, i.e.,
> 15%, the natural limit for fermented beverages,
showing that the procedure was worth the effort,
especially considering that this is a first distil-
lation, and a second one could increase the
ethanol content. The 12% alcohol content
observed here as the lesser value is higher than
Fig. 6. Gourd-shaped vessels from the Capacha cultural phase (1500–1000 BCE) of Colima, Mexico on
display in the State Capitol Museum (11–16) and the Caxitlán Archaeological Museum (17–20).
ECONOMIC BOTANY [VOL
the 9% distillate reported by Huang (2000:208)
for two experiments done with a bronze-steamer
still from a Chin period tomb (CE 1115–1234 )
in Hopei province, China.
The distillation process tested was effective at
producing ethanol from agave ferment. Use of
agave ferments for distillation during the Early
Formative is plausible because ceramic represen-
tations in the archaeological record from the
Valley of Colima and nearby areas, in conjunc-
tion with ethnohistoric evidence, suggest the
ceremonial use of alcoholic agave beverages made
from agave head juice (Butterwick 2000:107).
Representations of miniature cups for drinking
ceremonial beverages (see Townsend 2000:132)
imply the use of distilled beverages. Ethnohistoric
sources from the Early Colonial period (CE
1550–1580) include references to indigenous
peoples in the area around the Colima volcanoes
using agaves to produce “wine”(Alcalde-de Rueda
1580:158; Dávila-Quiñónez 1580:141; de
Agüero 1579:69). The Spanish word vino (wine)
can be used to refer to a distilled beverage, and
the term vino-mezcal (mezcal wine) has been
widely used for agave spirits in western Mexico
since at least the early 17th century, when de
Arregui (1621) described them as “clearer than
water and stronger than aguardiente.”Spanish
chroniclers also used the term vino de cocos
(coconut wine) to refer to coconut spirits (Tello
1632–1636; Zizumbo-Villarreal 1996). Both
corn and hog plum have been used to make very
culturally significant fermented beverages in west-
ern Mexico and therefore constitute other possi-
ble ferment sources (Bruman 1940,2000).
The regional relevance of the traditional bean
cooking method makes it a plausible analogue for
designing an ancient distillation technique. Beans
have been a primary protein source in Mesoa-
merica for millennia (Gepts 1988), and western
Mexico is proposed as the putative center of bean
domestication in Mesoamerica (Kwak et al.
2009). The “water cover”method was probably
a key cooking procedure among ancient cultures
since it effectively eliminates beans’high cyano-
genic content, and therefore “water cover”pot
technology may have played a key role in the
domestication process as a selective instrument.
In addition, cooking utensils such as the bean pot
can be considered as proto-stills because water
evaporation and vapor condensation occur inter-
nally due to the cooling function of the water in
the bowl (Needham et al. 1980:80–81).
TABLE 1. MEAN, STANDARD DEVIATION,AND CV OF THE DISTILLATE YIELD (DY, ML DISTILLATION PRODUCT/L OF FERMENT), ETHANOL CONCENTRATION (EC, G/L),
PERCENTAGE OF ETHANOL (EP, % V/V), AND ETHANOL PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY (EPE, GRAMS OF ETHANOL/LITER OF FERMENT/2 HOURS)OBTAINED WITH THE FOUR
EXPERIMENTAL “CAPACHA-TYPE MESOAMERICAN STILLS”ASSEMBLED WITH REPLICAS OF TRIFID (TS) AND GOURD-SHAPED (GS) VESSELS FROM THE CAPACHA CULTURAL
PHASE (1500–1000 BCE) OF COLIMA, MEXICO. TSC AND GSC USING CERAMIC CONDENSERS AND RECIPIENTS. TSG AND GSG USING CONDENSERS AND RECIPIENTS
MADE WITH GOURD (L. SICERARIA)FRUIT PERICARP.
Capacha-Type Still n
DY
CV
EC
CV
EP
CV
EPE
CV
mL/L g /L % v/v g/L/2 h
Mean Mean Mean Mean
TSC 5 34.4± 22.2 64.7 A
a
163.1± 23.2 14.2 A 20.1±2.9 14.2 A 5.2± 2.5 48.8 A
GSC 5 43.8±21.9 49.9 A 171.1± 51.1 29.9 A 22.5±5.9 26.3 A 7.8 ±5.6 71.9 A
TSG 5 56.8±25 44.7 A 139.8±33 23.6 A 17.7±4.2 23.7 A 7.6 ±3.3 43.3 A
GSG 5 63.8± 12.9 20.3 A 167.4±43.9 26.2 A 21.2±5.6 26.2 A 10.6±2.8 26.6 A
a
Different letters mean statistically significant differences p<0.05.
ZIZUMBO-VILLARREAL ET AL: DISTILLATION IN WESTERN MESOAMERICA2009]
The key technological advance in the develop-
ment of still assemblies would have been internal
placement of a miniature cup for distillate
collection and removal (Needham et al.
1980:89, 94–95). In fact, Kelly (1980:46)
reported a miniature olla inside a bean pot. This
finding suggests its possible use as a still. Based on
this initial arrangement, more sophisticated still
designs would have been developed, such as the
bifid and trifid vessels. Their arrangement of two
superimposed reservoirs joined by tubes allows a
recipient to be placed in the upper reservoir,
creating an arrangement very similar to the
Mongol still. Indeed, a trifid vessel on display in
the Regional Museum of Guadalajara (RMG)
includes a miniature olla that would have
functioned perfectly well as a recipien t
(Fig. 7A). A simplified version of this distillation
system would have included a single tube
connecting the two reservoirs, as occurs in gourd
vessels, although this would require that the
receptacle be hung and that the condenser apply
pressure against the pot sides. This is how we
arranged the still assembly using the gourd vessel
for the present experiment, and a similar system
was reported by Lumholtz (1902:184) for the
Huichol people when using a Mongol-type still.
Needham et al. (1980:81) also considered
steamer vessels to be possible proto-stills. Based
on the similarities between Chinese steamer pots
and gourd and trifid vessels from Capacha,
Colima, these authors proposed that they could
have functioned as stills. Kelly (1980:54) believed
the gourd and trifid pots to have been utilitarian,
although similar designs do not occur in current
traditional ceramic technology in the region. One
possible scenario is that the trifid and gourd
vessels would have been designed initially as
TABLE 2. MEAN, STANDARD DEVIATION,AND CV OF THE HEIGHT,WIDTH,AND MOUTH DIAMETER OF TRIFID AND
GOURD-SHAPED VESSELS FROM THE CAPACHA CULTURAL PHASE (1500–1000 BCE) OF COLIMA, MEXICO. TK,
TRIFID VESSELS REPORTED BY KELLY (1980); GK, GOURD-SHAPED VESSELS REPORTED BY KELLY (1980); GM,
GOURD-SHAPED VESSELS ON DISPLAY IN THREE MUSEUMS IN COLIMA: MUSEUM OF COLIMA REGIONAL HISTORY
(MCRH), STATE CAPITOL MUSEUM (SCM), AND CAXITLÁN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MUSEUM (CAM).
Vessel Type n
Height
CV
Width
CV
Mouth diameter
CV
cm cm cm
Mean Mean Mean
TK 7 23.6±5.5 23.5 B
a
12.1± 2.5 20.8 B 9.2 ±2.5 27.1 B
GK 10 30.9±5.6 18.2 A 18.2± 2.7 14.7 A 17.7±3.2 18.3 A
GM 20 30.7±4.8 15.6 A 20.0± 4.4 21.9 A 20.4±4.0 19.6 A
a
Different letters mean statistically significant differences p<0.05.
Fig. 7. (A) Trifid vessel and miniature pot from the Capacha cultural phase (1500–1000 BCE) of Colima,
Mexico that could be used as a recipient, on display in the Regional Museum of Guadalajara. (B) Gourd-shape
vessel from El Pantano culture (1000–800 BCE) of Jalisco, that could be used as a steamer, on display in the
Archaeological Museum of Mascota.
ECONOMIC BOTANY [VOL
steamers and then evolved into stills. Both vessel
types easily support wrapped, solid food in the
upper pot for steam-cooking by the boiling water
in the lower pot. Kelly (1980:55) even cites a
secondary source referring to a gourd pot “whose
upper and lower bodies were separated on the
interior by a clay divider, pierced by spaced
perforations,”much like a steamer. There is also
a gourd-shaped vessel in the Archaeological
Museum of Mascota (AMM) with an interior
grating in its constriction that would have allowed
it to function as a steamer (Fig. 7B). Its shape
differs notably from that of Capacha period gourd
vessels—it is smaller in size and its waist is much
more constricted—but it was recorded in a
Middle Formative cemetery of El Pantano culture
(1000–800 BCE) in the Mascota Valley, Jalisco,
culturally associated with the Capacha phase
(Mountjoy 2006). This suggests that western
Mesoamerican cultures did make ceramic steam-
ers, and could have adapted this technology for
distillation, much as the Chinese did (Huang
2000; Needham et al. 1980).
The bean-pot, trifid, and gourd vessels all have
a wide mouth suitable for holding a hemispheric
bowl or a small jar as a top. Mountjoy (2006)
reported several assembled “water cover”bean-pot
vessels in the Mascota Valley cemeteries men-
tioned above. The gourd vessels’larger size,
greater ferment volume capacity, and consequent
ability to produce larger distillate volumes suggest
that they are the improved version of the
“Capacha-type Mesoamerican still.”They are also
much more frequent in the Valley of Colima
archaeological record. Indeed, almost half of the
vessels recorded by Kelly (1980:55) are gourd
pots, whereas bifid and trifid vessels are scarce in
the record and almost absent in Mexican muse-
ums. This difference in vessel type frequency may
be due to wider use of the gourd vessels, but may
also be a result of the higher prices offered for
bifid and trifid vessels on the illegal antiquities
market. Assembled gourd, bifid, or trifid stills
may yet be discovered, although it may be quite a
wait since looting in the region has been very
intense and extensive for a long time.
Capacha period ceramics have always been
recorded as burial offerings, normally placed
vertically on the body of the deceased or to one
side, indicating the importance accorded them.
Their ritual context and small distillate volume
production capacity suggest that if they were used
for this purpose, it was probably as a means to
produce a prestigious product for ceremonial
purposes. Archaeological evidence suggests that
agave culture was significant during the Early
Classic period (CE 200–550) in Colima, possibly
in relation to its use in alcoholic beverage
production and the use of these in religious
ceremonies (Zizumbo-Villarreal et al. 2009a).
Presence of stills in the Colima region during
the Early Formative period (1500–1300 BCE)
would indicate that complex food systems were in
place, and consequently that complex agricultural
systems also existed, the structuring of which
would have required long periods of time. It
would also indicate that alcoholic beverages were
part of their culture. Certainly, the Early and
Middle Formative periods document the earliest
sedentary populations in West Mexico and the
continuing spread of agriculture across the region
(Beekman 2009). Wild populations of the three
main crops of the Mesoamerican diet are present
in the region: corn (Buckler et al. 2006;
Fukunaga et al. 2005; Moeller et al. 2007), beans
(Kwak et al. 2009; Zizumbo-Villareal et al.
2009b), and squash (Sanjur et al. 2002). Given
this coincidence, some researchers have proposed
west Mexico as the most probable center of origin
for cultivation and domestication of these species,
about 9,000 calendar years B.P. (Matsuoka et al.
2002; Piperno et al. 2009; Ranere et al. 2009).
Although very little archaeobotanical research has
been done in the region (Benz 2002), bone
isotope studies of the skeletal remains have
revealed that the population of the El Pantano
culture in the Mascota Valley, Jalisco, consumed
maize (Cahue et al. 2002), and this fits well with
the frequent appearance of grinding stones in
Capacha burials (Kelly 1980). With respect to the
cultural importance of alcoholic beverages, the
ceramic of the Western Mesoamerican culture is
highly illustrative of their importance, and the
abundance of all kinds of exotic bottle forms is a
shared and suggestive characteristic (Beekman
2009; Butterwick 2000).
Kelly (1980:2) defined the distribution of
known Capacha cemeteries to be the Armería-
Ayuquila-Tuxcacuesco and the Tuxpan-Coa-
huayana river basins, but predicted a wider
cultural influence based on Capacha-affiliated
pottery specimens (Kelly 1980:22). To date,
however, the most spectacular Capacha-like
ceramics, according to Beekman (2009), are those
reported by Mountjoy (2006) from the Mascota
Valley, Jalisco, that document the transition of
ZIZUMBO-VILLARREAL ET AL: DISTILLATION IN WESTERN MESOAMERICA2009]
Capacha to El Pantano culture. The spatial and
temporal depth of this culture’s spread and
influence, including the putative “Capacha-type
Mesoamerican still”technology, remains to be
described through future research.
Sources unequivocally referring to agave spirits
production are colonial sources dating to the early
17th century. Introduction of the Chinese/Mon-
gol-type still by Filipinos during the late 16th
century very probably facilitated spirits produc-
tion, bringing it to a noticeable scale (Zizumbo-
Villarreal and Colunga-GarcíaMarín 2008). The
Spanish Crown later prohibited production and
sale of all fermented or distilled beverages by
native populations. In Colima, ethnohistoric
sources record that this prohibition led to
destruction of ceramic vessels containing native-
made wines and severe punishment for those
making them (Sebastián de Vera [1612] in
Sevilla-del Río 1977:60). Despite centuries of
prohibition and persecution, tenacious preserva-
tion of ancient agave pit-cooking and fermenting
technologies in the isolated ravines of the Colima
volcanoes and other mountains of west Mexico,
and their use for traditional spirits production,
helped to keep alive the traditions that would
bring the world mezcal and tequila (Zizumbo-
Villarreal and Colunga-GarcíaMarín 2008). This
tradition could be thousands of years old.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank CONACYT and CICY for
the sabbatical scholarship for D.Z.-V. and P.C.-
G.M., and P. Gepts for his hospitality at U.C.-
Davis. Field work was partially supported by the
Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia-
Colima (INAH) through the Archaeological
Project Ixtlahuacán No. 552. The University of
Colima kindly provided logistical support. Guil-
lermo Ríos-Alcalá (Museo Universitario de Artes
Populares, Colima) and Edith Zizumbo-Villarreal
(Colegio de Ciencia y Arte de la Vida, Toluca)
made the vessels’replicas. Apolinar, Macario, and
Miguel Partida prepared the agave ferments. Saúl
Alcántara helped with photographs. Felipe Bar-
ahona (Unidad de Materiales-CICY) kindly advised
us in the ethanol quantification techniques.
Literature Cited
al-Hassan, A. Y., ed., M. Ahmed, and A. Z.
Iskandar, co-eds. 2002. The Different Aspects
of Islamic Culture, Science and Technology in
Islam. Vol. 4, Part II. Technology and Applied
Sciences. UNESCO, Paris.
Alcalde-de Rueda, J. 1580. Relación de parte de
la Provincia de Motín. Pages 156–180 in R.
Acuña, ed., 1987, Relaciones geográficas del
siglo XVI: Michoacán. Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de México, México D.F.
Beekman, C. S. 2009. Recent Research in Western
Mexican Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological
Research. Published online 2 September 2009:
DOI 10.1007/s10814-009-9034-x.
Benz, B. 2002. The Origins of Mesoamerican
Agriculture: Reconnaissance and Testing in
the Sayula-Zacoalco Lake Basin. Foundation
for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Stud-
ies, Inc. (FAMSI). http://www.famsi.org/
reports/99074/ (20 October 2009).
Benz, B. F., L. López-Mestas, and J. Ramos-de la
Vega. 2006. Organic Offerings, Paper, and
Fibers from the Huitzilapa Shaft Tomb, Jalisco,
Mexico. Ancient Mesoamerica 17(2):283–296.
doi:10.1017/S0956536106060196.
Bourke, J. G. 1893. Primitive Distillation among
the Tarascoes. American Anthropologist 6:65–
70.
Bruman, H. J. 1940. Aboriginal Drink Areas of
New Spain. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cal-
ifornia, Berkley.
——— 1944. The Asiatic Origin of the Huichol
Still. Geographical Review 34(3):418–427.
——— 2000. Alcohol in Ancient Mexico. Uni-
versity of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
Buckler, E. S., M. M. Goodman, T. P. Holstford,
J. F. Dobley, and G. J. Sánchez. 2006.
Phylogoegraphy of the Wild Subspecies of
Zea mayz. Maydica 51:123–134.
Butterwick, K. 2000. Comida para los muertos: el
arte de los banquetes en el Occidente. Pages
93–110 in R. Townsend and C. E. Gutiérrez-
Arce, eds., El antiguo occidente de México:
Arte y arqueología de un pasado desconocido.
The Art Institute of Chicago, Gobierno del
Estado de Colima y Secretaría de Cultura
Gobierno de Colima, México.
Cáceres-Farfán, M., P. Lappe, A. Larqué-Saavedra,
A. Magdub-Méndez, and L. Barahona-Pérez.
2008. Ethanol Production from Henequen
(Agave fourcroydes Lem.) Juice and Molasses
by Mixture of Two Yeasts. Bioresource Tech-
nology 99:9036–9039.
Cahue, L., M. R. Schurr, J. B. Mountjoy, D. S.
Weaver, and J. Erb. 2002. A Stable Isotopic
Assessment of Maize Consumption among the
ECONOMIC BOTANY [VOL
Earliest Settled Villagers in Jalisco, West
Mexico. Paper presented at the 67th Annual
Meeting of the Society for American Archae-
ology, Denver, Colorado.
Coe, S. D. 1994. America’s First Cuisines.
University of Texas Press, Austin.
Colunga-GarcíaMarín, P. and D. Zizumbo-Villarreal.
2007. Tequila and Other Agave Spirits from
West-Central Mexico: Current Germplasm
Diversity, Conservation and Origin. Biodiversity
and Conservation 16(6):1653–1667.
Dávila-Quiñonez, B. 1580. Relación de Quaco-
mán. Pages 135–143 in R. Acuña, ed., 1987,
Relaciones geográficas del siglo XVI: Michoacán.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,
México D.F.
de Agüero, F. 1579. Relación de Zapotitlán.
Pages 57–82 in R. Acuña, ed., Relaciones
geográficas del siglo XVI: Nueva Galicia
(1988). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de
México, México D.F.
de Arregui, D. L. 1621. Descripción de la Nueva
Galicia. Consejo Superior de Investigación
Científica. Escuela de Estudios Hispanoamer-
icanos Sevilla, España (F. Chavalier, ed.,
1946).
Erickson, D. L., B. D. Smith, A. C. Clarke, D.
H. Sandweiss, and N. Tuross. 2005. An Asian
Origin for a 10,000-Year-Old Domesticated
Plant in the Americas. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America 102:18315–18320.
Feliciano, R. T. 1926. Illicit Beverages. Philippine
Journal of Science 29:465–473.
Flannery, K. V. 1986. Radiocarbon Dates. Pages
175–176 in K.V. Flannery, ed., Guilá
Naquitz. Archaic Foraging and Early Agricul-
ture in Oaxaca, México. Academic Press, New
York.
Fukunaga, K., J. Hill, Y. Vigouroux, Y. Matsuoka,
J. Sánchez, K. Lu, E. S. Bucler, and J. Dobley.
2005. Genetic Diversity and Population Struc-
ture of Teocintle. Genetics 169:2241–1154.
Gepts, P. 1988. Phaseolin as an Evolutionary
Marker. Pages 215–241 in P. Gepts, ed.,
Genetic Resources of Phaseolus Beans. Kluwer,
Dordrecht.
Godoy, A., T. Herrera, and M. Ulloa. 2003.
Bebidas alcohólicas no destiladas indígenas de
México. UNAM, México D.F.
Gonçalves de Lima, O. 1986. El maguey y el
pulque en los códices mexicanos. Fondo de
Cultura Económica, México D.F.
Huang, H. T. 2000. Science and Civilisation in
China. Vol. 6. Biology and Biological Tech-
nology. Part IV. Fermentations and Food
Science. in J. Needham, ed., Science and
Civilisation in China. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
Kelly, I. 1974. Stirrup Pots from Colima: Some
Implications. Pages 206–211 in B. Bell, ed.,
The Archaeology of West Mexico. Sociedad de
Estudios Avanzados de Occidente, Ajijic,
Jalisco.
——— 1980. Ceramic Sequence in Colima:
Capacha, an Early Phase. Anthropological Papers
No. 37. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Kwak, M., J. Kami, and P. Gepts. 2009. The
Putative Mesoamerican Domestication Center
of Phaseolus vulgaris Is Located in the Lerma-
Santiago Basin of Mexico. Crop Science
49:554–563.
Lumholtz, C. 1902. Unknown Mexico: A Record
of Five Years’Exploration among the Tribes of
the Western Sierra Madre; In the Tierra
Caliente of Tepic and Jalisco; And among
the Tarascans of Michoacán, Vol. II. Charles
Scribner’s Sons, New York.
Matsuoka, Y., Y. Vigouroux, M. M. Goodman,
G. J. Sánchez, E. Buckler, and J. Doebley.
2002. A Single Domestication for Maize Shown
by Multilocus Microsatellite Genotyping. Pro-
ceedings of the National Academy of Science of
the United States of America 99:6080–6084.
McGovern, P. E., J. Zhang, J. Tang, Z. Zhang,
G. R. Hall, R. A. Moreau, A. Nuñez, E. D.
Butrym, M. P. Richards, C.-S. Wang, G.
Cheng, Z. Zhao, and C. Wang. 2004.
Fermented Beverages of Pre- and Proto-His-
toric China. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Science of the United State of
America 101:1793–17598.
Moeller, D. A., M. I. Tenaillon, and P. Tiffin.
2007. Population Structure and Its Effects on
Patterns of Nucleotide Polymorfism in Teo-
cintle (Zea mays spp parviglumis). Genetics
176:1799–1809.
Mountjoy, J. B. 2006. Excavation of Two Middle
Formative Cemeteries in the Mascota Valley of
Jalisco, México. Foundation for the Advance-
ment of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc. (FAMSI).
http://www.famsi.org/reports/03009 (20
October 2009).
Needham, J. and G.-D. Lu. 1985. Trans Pacific
Echoes and Resonances: Listening Once Again.
World Scientific, Singapore and Philadelphia.
ZIZUMBO-VILLARREAL ET AL: DISTILLATION IN WESTERN MESOAMERICA2009]
———, H. Yu, G.-D. Lu, and N. Sivin. 1980.
Science and Civilization in China. Vol. 5.
Alchemy and Chemistry. Part IV. Apparatus,
Theories and Gifts. J. Needham, ed., Science
and Civilisation in China. Cambridge Univer-
sity Press, Cambridge.
Piperno, D. R., A. J. Ranere, I. Holst, J. Iriarte,
and R. Dickau. 2009. Starch Grain and
Phytolith Evidence for Early Ninth Millen-
nium B.P. Maize from the Central Balsas
River Valley, Mexico. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Science of the United
States of America 106:5019–5024.
Ranere, A. J., D. R. Piperno, I. Holst, R. Dickau,
and J. Iriarte. 2009. The Cultural and
Chronological Context of Early Holocene
Maize and Squash Domestication in the
Central Balsas River Valley, Mexico. Proceed-
ings of the National Academy of Science of the
United States of America 106:5014–5018.
Sanjur, O. I., D. R. Piperno, T. C. Andres, and L.
Wessel-Beaver. 2002. Phylogenetic Relation-
ships among Domesticated and Wild Species
of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae) Inferred from a
Mitochondrial Gene: Implications for Crop
Plant Evolution and Areas of Origin. Proceed-
ings of the National Academy of Science of the
United States of America 99:535–540.
SAS. 1992. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, release 6.03
edition. SAS Institute. Cary, North Carolina.
Schöndube, B. O. 2000. Recursos naturales y
asentamientos humanos en el antiguo occi-
dente. Pages 209–219 in R. Townsend and
C. E. Gutiérrez-Arce, eds., El antiguo occidente
de México: Arte y arqueología de un pasado
desconocido. The Art Institute of Chicago,
Gobierno del Estado de Colima y Secretaría
de Cultura Gobierno de Colima, México.
Sevilla-del Río, F. 1977. La Provança de la Villa
de Colima. En su defensa ante un manda-
miento de la Real Audiencia de México, que
ordenaba la tala total de los palmares col-
imenses, año 1612. Editorial Jus, México D.F.
Smith, Jr., C. E. 1986. Preceramic Plant Remains
from Guilá Naquitz.Pages 265–301 in K. V.
Flannery, ed., Guilá Naquitz. Archaic Foraging
and Early Agriculture in Oaxaca, México.
Academic Press, New York.
Tello, A. F. 1632–1636. Crónica Miscelánea de
la Sancta Provincia de Xalisco: Libro Segundo.
Instituto Jaliscience de Antropología e His-
toria. Serie de Historia 9 Vol. III. (1984)
Gobierno del Estado de Jalisco, Guadalajara.
Townsend, R. 2000. Antes de los dioses, antes de
los reyes. Pages 111–139 in R. Townsend and
C. E. Gutiérrez-Arce, eds., El antiguo occidente
de México: Arte y arqueología de un pasado
desconocido. The Art Institute of Chicago,
Gobierno del Estado de Colima y Secretaría de
Cultura Gobierno de Colima, México.
Valdez, F. 2000. Recursos y asentamientos anti-
guos en la cuenca de Sayula. Pages 221–237 in
R. Townsend and C. E. Gutiérrez-Arce, eds.,
El antiguo occidente de México: Arte y
arqueología de un pasado desconocido. The
Art Institute of Chicago, Gobierno del Estado
de Colima y Secretaría de Cultura Gobierno
de Colima, México.
Vela, E., ed. 2005. Tesoros de Colima: Hallazgos
de ayer y hoy. Arqueología Mexicana. Editorial
Raíces, México D.F.
Williams, M. and D. Reese. 1950. Colorimetric
Determination of Ethyl Alcohol. Analytical
Chemistry 22(12):1556–1561.
Zizumbo-Villarreal, D. 1996. History of Coconut
in Mexico. Genetic Resources and Crop
Evolution 43:505–515.
———, and P. Colunga-GarcíaMarín. 2008.
Early Coconut Distillation and the Origins of
Mescal and Tequila Liquor in Western Mexico.
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 55:493–
510.
———, F. González-Zozaya, A. Olay-Barrientos,
R. Platas-Ruíz, M. Cuevas-Sagardi, L. Almendros-
López, and P. Colunga-GarcíaMarín. 2009a.
Archaeological Evidence of the Cultural Impor-
tance of Agave spp. in Pre-Hispanic Colima,
Mexico. Economic Botany 63(3):288–302.
doi:10.1007/s12231-009-9092-5.
———, R. Papa, M. Hufford, S. Repinski, and
P. Gepts. 2009b. Identification of New Wild
Population of Phaseolus vulgaris L. in Western
Jalisco, Mexico, near the Mesoamerican
Domestication Center of Common Bean.
Bean Improvement Cooperative (BIC) 52:
24–25.
ECONOMIC BOTANY [VOL