Article

Impact of preoperative atrial fibrillation on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes of mechanical mitral valve replacement for rheumatic mitral valve disease

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.3). 05/2012; 43(3). DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs213
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The prognostic significance of preoperative atrial fibrillation on mitral valve replacement remains unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of the presence of preoperative atrial fibrillation on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes of mitral valve replacement for rheumatic valve disease. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on a total of 793 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement with or without tricuspid valve repair in our hospital. The patients selected were divided into two groups according to preoperative rhythm status. Patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation were assigned to the AF group, while patients in preoperative sinus rhythm were assigned to the SR group. Postoperative follow-up was performed by outpatient visits, as well as by telephone and written correspondence. Data gathered included survivorship, postoperative complications, left ventricular function and tricuspid regurgitation. RESULTS: For patients with atrial fibrillation vs. those in sinus rhythm, there was no difference in postoperative mortality and morbidity. Follow-up was a mean of 8.6 ± 2.4 years. For patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation, 10-year survival from a Kaplan-Meier curve was 88.7%, compared with 96.6% in patients with preoperative sinus rhythm (P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified low left ventricular ejection fraction, older age, large left atrium and preoperative atrial fibrillation as significant adverse predictors for overall survival. Freedom from thromboembolism complications at 13 years was lower for patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation without maze procedure and left atrial appendage ligation, compared with that for patients with preoperative sinus rhythm without maze procedure and left atrial appendage ligation, and patients with concomitant maze procedure and left atrial appendage ligation (76.3 vs. 94.8 vs. 94.0%, respectively; P = 0.001). On echocardiography, the proportion of patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation was 38.7% (atrial fibrillation patients) vs. 25.4% (patients in sinus rhythm; P < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction measured 5 years after surgery increased by an average of 1.2% in the AF group, while it increased by 5.3% in the SR group (P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative atrial fibrillation is a risk factor for long-term mortality, thromboembolism complications and tricuspid regurgitation, and it also has an adverse effect on the degree of improvement when considering left ventricular function.

Full-text preview

Available from: ejcts.oxfordjournals.org

  • No preview · Article · Apr 2013 · Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with less favorable outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve and tricuspid valve surgery. Despite growing evidence on the potential benefits of surgical ablation for AF there is significant variability among surgeons in treatment of AF. The purpose of our study was to assess the effect of the Cox-maze procedure on operative and follow-up outcomes. In our prospective study, patients who underwent isolated mitral valve or mitral valve+tricuspid valve surgery without history of AF (n = 506), with untreated AF (n = 75), or with Cox-maze procedure (n = 236) were included (N = 817). Sinus rhythm was captured according to Heart Rhythm Society guidelines. Patients who underwent the Cox-maze procedure were propensity score matched to patients without history of AF resulting in 208 pairs of patients. Operative outcomes were comparable after propensity score matching (Cox-maze procedure vs no AF) stroke/transient ischemic attack (0.5% vs 0.5%; P = 1.00), renal failure (2.9% vs 1.4%; P = .34), and operative mortality (1.4% vs 1.4%; P = 1.00). High return to sinus rhythm was documented at 6, 12, and 24 months (92%, 91%, and 86%, respectively) as well as sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic drugs (79%, 84%, and 82%, respectively). Incidence of embolic stroke in patients who underwent Cox-maze procedure was 1.7% (4 out of 232 patients) and 5.1 cases per 1000 person-years. No difference in 4-year cumulative survival between propensity score-matched groups (91.9% vs 86.9%; log rank, 1.67; P = .20), but higher for patients who underwent Cox-maze procedure versus patients with untreated AF (hazard ratio, 2.47; P = .048). Higher additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (odds ratio, 1.40; P < .001) and limited surgeon experience with Cox-maze procedure (odds ratio, 3.60; P < .001) were significant predictors for failure to perform Cox-maze procedure. In our center, 76% of patients undergoing mitral valve or mitral valve+tricuspid valve surgery experiencing AF underwent concomitant Cox-maze procedure, which is considerably higher than the national average. No increased morbidity was associated with the Cox-maze procedure with the benefit of very low thromboembolic rate. These results suggest the need for performance-based education for AF surgical ablation to achieve optimal outcomes.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2013 · The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To assess the impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) on the early outcomes of patients underoin aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods The clinical data of 961 adult patients who underwent AVR in Department of Cardiothoracic Surery, Chanhai Hospital between Jan. 2000 and Dec. 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients with pre-operative AF were assined to AF roup (= 54) and the rest to non-AF roup (n = 907). Pre-, intra-, and postoperative findinswere compared to assess the impact of AF on early outcomes. Possible risk factors affectin the early mortality were identified usin loistic reression analysis. Results AF patients compared with non-AF patients had an elder age(P<0. 001), hiher NYHA functional classification ff (P = 0. 039), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0. 017), and hiher proportionof pulmonary hypertension (P < 0. 001). Accordinly, the postoperative early mortality, mechanical ventilation time, and incidences of low cardiac outputsyndrome, cardiac arrest/ventricular fibrillation, and acute renal failure were sinificantly hiher in the AF roup than those in the non-AF roup (P<0. 05). Loistic reression analysis showed that age, NYHA functional classification ff, AF and cardiopulmonary bypass time>120 min were independent risk factors for early mortality. Conclusion AF has a neative impact on the early outcomes of patients underoin AVR. AF patients have hiher pos-operative early mortality and more related complications compared with non-AF patients.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2014 · Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
Show more