A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Developmental Psychology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Peer Sexual Harassment and Disordered Eating in Early Adolescence
Jennifer L. Petersen
University of Wisconsin–Whitewater
Janet S. Hyde
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Peer sexual harassment is a pervasive problem in schools and is associated with a variety of negative
mental health outcomes. Objectification theory suggests that sexual attention in the form of peer
harassment directs unwanted attention to the victim’s body and may lead to a desire to alter the body via
disordered eating. In the current study, we used latent growth modeling with a sample of 406 U.S.
adolescents to examine the relationship between longitudinal trends in peer sexual harassment from 5th
to 9th grade and disordered eating in 9th grade. Longitudinal trends in self-surveillance were proposed
as a mediator of the relationships. Results indicated that the relationship between upsetting sexual harass-
ment at 5th grade and disordered eating symptoms at 9th grade was mediated by self-surveillance at 5th grade.
Girls reported more upsetting sexual harassment, more self-surveillance, and thus more disordered eating than
boys did. These results are in accord with objectification theory, which proposes that sexual harassment is a
form of sexual objectification and may lead to self-surveillance and disordered eating.
Keywords: disordered eating, body image, body esteem, sexual harassment, objectification theory
More than 80% of students in Grades 8 through 11 in the United
States have reported that they have been victims of some form of
sexual harassment during their school lives (American Association
of University Women [AAUW], 2001; Petersen & Hyde, 2009).
Victims of peer sexual harassment are also likely to report depres-
sion (Nadeem & Graham, 2005), anxiety (Nishina & Juvonen,
2005), low body esteem (Lindberg, Grabe, & Hyde, 2007), and
reduced academic performance (AAUW, 2001; Duffy, Wareham,
& Walsh, 2004). Sexual harassment may be particularly harmful
among adolescents because it is associated with problems in the
development of healthy body esteem and healthy eating habits
(Harned & Fitzgerald, 2002).
The current study described developmental trends in peer sexual
harassment and examined the relationship between trends in peer
sexual harassment and disordered eating behaviors. Disordered
eating includes unhealthy eating behaviors such as avoiding eating
when one is hungry and vomiting after eating. These unhealthy
eating behaviors are associated with negative physical and mental
health including fatigue, anemia, amenorrhea, and depression
(Yeager, Agostini, Nattiv, & Drinkwater, 1993). Furthermore, the
research investigated self-objectification as a mediator of the re-
lationship of peer sexual harassment to disordered eating.
Objectification Theory
Objectification theory states that Western society has developed
a culture in which the human body, particularly the female body,
is an object to be looked at and evaluated (Fredrickson & Roberts,
1997; McKinley & Hyde, 1996). This type of objectification from
others may occur in a variety of forms including sexual harass-
ment. Objectification theory states that victims of repeated sexual
objectification, such as upsetting sexual harassment, eventually
internalize the observer’s perspective and evaluate themselves in
terms of their outward appearance (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997;
McKinley & Hyde, 1996). Therefore, victims of objectification
from others begin to view themselves as objects to be looked at, a
process that objectification theory refers to as “self-
objectification” (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997; McKinley & Hyde,
1996). McKinley and Hyde coined the term objectified body con-
sciousness (OBC) to refer to one’s self-objectification. Although
OBC has several components, the driving force behind body
objectification is self-surveillance (Lindberg et al., 2007; Noll &
Fredrickson, 1998). Self-surveillance refers to the concept of view-
ing oneself as an outsider would, by making self-evaluations about
one’s appearance. Although self-surveillance often leads to a neg-
ative evaluation of one’s appearance, it is not the same as body
dissatisfaction; rather, it is the cognitive component of mental
preoccupation with one’s physical appearance.
Objectification theory argues that individuals who self-objectify
focus their attention on an ideal physical appearance, which they
are unable to attain and which may be linked to negative outcomes
such as disordered eating (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997). In sup-
port of this argument McKinley and Hyde (1996) found that
women who rated themselves high on the self-surveillance scale
were also likely to diet and restrict their eating. Fredrickson,
Roberts, Noll, Quinn, and Twenge (1998) manipulated self-
objectification experimentally by having participants try on a
swimsuit. Participants wearing the swimsuit demonstrated in-
creased body shame and more restrained eating behavior in com-
parison to other participants who wore a sweater. Together these
studies suggest a link between self-objectification and disordered
eating.
This article was published Online First April 30, 2012.
Jennifer L. Petersen, Educational Foundations, College of Education
and Professional Studies, University of Wisconsin–Whitewater; Janet S.
Hyde, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
This research was supported by a grant from the Graduate School of the
University of Wisconsin–Madison.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jennifer
L. Petersen, University of Wisconsin–Whitewater, 800 West Main Street,
Whitewater, WI 53190. E-mail: petersej@uww.edu
Developmental Psychology © 2012 American Psychological Association
2013, Vol. 49, No. 1, 184–195 0012-1649/12/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0028247
184
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.