LYMPHOMAS (J ARMITAGE AND P MCLAUGHLIN, SECTION EDITORS)
Targeting Chemokine Receptor CCR4 in Adult T-Cell
Leukemia-Lymphoma and Other T-Cell Lymphomas
Kensei Tobinai & Takeshi Takahashi & Shiro Akinaga
Published online: 27 April 2012
#The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Abstract Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a group of
lymphoid malignancy that remains difficult to treat, as most
PTCL becomes refractory or relapses, and thus there is an
unmet medical need for novel treatment modalities. CC
chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) is expressed in various types
of PTCL including adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL),
which has the worst prognosis among them. A phase II
study of a defucosylated, humanized anti-CCR4 monoclonal
antibody, mogamulizumab (KW-0761), yielded an overall
response rate of 50 % (13/26) and a median progression-free
survival of 5.2 months in relapsed patients with CCR4-
positive ATL who had been previously treated with chemo-
therapy. Mogamulizumab also showed potential efficacy for
cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in a US phase I/II study. Further
preclinical and clinical investigations are needed to examine
whether concomitant use of this novel agent with other
agents with different mechanisms of action would be more
effective for ATL and other PTCLs.
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) represents a small,
heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)
which is derived from more mature T-cells and natural killer
(NK) cells, and accounts for approximately 10 % of NHL
cases in Western countries [1, 2] and for approximately
20 %–25 % of those in Japan [3, 4]. PTCL, a collective
entity of nearly 20 different subtypes defined according to
morphology, immunophenotype, genotype, and clinical fea-
tures , can be largely classified into the following two
groups according to clinical features including the sites of
lesions: (1) cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), which is
the general term for diseases that initially or mainly occur in
the skin, and (2) PTCL other than CTCL. Treatmentstrategies
have been separately developed for these two groups .
Treatment options are substantially different for B-cell
and T-cell lymphomas. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclo-
nal antibody, was developed for the treatment of B-cell
lymphomas. The introduction of this agent into clinical
practice has greatly improved the prognosis of patients with
B-cell lymphoma . Recently, bendamustine, which has
little cross resistance with other chemotherapeutic agents
presumably associated with its unique chemical structure
of an alkylating agent and a nucleoside analog, has been
developed as effective treatment of relapsed or refractory
B-cell lymphoma, considering its lack of cross resistance
with other chemotherapeutic agents . However, PTCL
remains extremely difficult to treat, because most PTCL sub-
types become refractory to even aggressive chemotherapy
K. Tobinai (*)
Department of Hematology, and Hematopoietic Stem Cell
Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital,
5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku,
Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
Clinical Development Department, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd,
1-6-1 Ohtemachi, Chiyoda-ku,
Tokyo 100-8185, Japan
Development Division, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd,
1-6-1 Ohtemachi, Chiyoda-ku,
Tokyo 100-8185, Japan
Curr Hematol Malig Rep (2012) 7:235–240
regimens or relapse, with the exception of anaplastic lympho-
ma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK+
ALCL),which responds wellto the cyclophosphamide, doxo-
rubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen .
Among the various entities of PTCLs, adult T-cell leukemia-
lymphoma (ATL) harbors the worst prognosis . Here, we
will discuss novel agents that have been developed for the
treatment of ATL andother PTCLs, mainly focusing onmoga-
mulizumab/KW-0761, which is a humanized monoclonal an-
tibody targeting CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) that has
been actively developed for clinical use in Japan and the
PTCL and Novel Agents
PTCL-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) and angioim-
munoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), which are the most
common subtypes of PTCL (PTCL-NOS, 26 %; AITL,
19 %), show a poor prognosis with 5-year overall survival
(OS) and failure-free survival (FFS) of about 30 % and
20 %, respectively . Several new agents have recently
been developed for the treatment of PTCL, mainly in patients
with relapsed or refractory disease. Such agents have various
mechanisms of action, including an immunomodulator
(lenalidomide), a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib), histone
deacetylase inhibitors (vorinostat, romidepsin, panobinostat),
antifolate (pralatrexate), and biologics including antibodies
and antibody-toxin/drug conjugates (alemtuzumab, siplizu-
mab, denileukin diftitox, and brentuximab vedotin) as well
as nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine, gemcitabine, nelar-
abine, and forodesine . Of these agents, pralatrexate and
Drug Administration (FDA) and are now being used in the
brentuximab vedotin (formerly known as SGN-35) was also
ATL has the worst prognosis among PTCL, with 5-year
OS and FFS of 14 % and 12 %, respectively . ATL is a
peripheral T-cell malignancy associated with human T-cell
lymphotropicvirus typeI (HTLV-1), and is relatively frequent
in southwestern Japan, West Africa, the Caribbean islands,
and Brazil, which are HTLV-1 endemic areas . It is esti-
mated that there are about 1.2 million HTLV-1 carriers in
Japan, of whom a few percent develop ATL , and approx-
imately 700 to 1000 people die of this disease per year .
chronic, and smoldering), based on clinical features including
and organ infiltration, and the median survival time varies
according to the disease type: acute type, 6 months; lympho-
ma type, 10 months; chronic type, 24 months; and smoldering
type, 3 years or more . It is recommended that treatment
strategies should be selected according to the disease subtype
. In Japan, the acute type, lymphoma type, and chronic
type with unfavorable prognostic factors have been regarded
as aggressive ATL subtypes requiring immediate treatment,
and intensive combination chemotherapy or allogeneic hema-
therapeutic options .
The Japan Clinical Oncology Group-Lymphoma Study
Group (JCOG-LSG) has been investigating the efficacy of
combination chemotherapy for aggressive lymphomas in-
cluding ATL or for ATL alone since the early 1980s. At the
start of the investigation, CHOP-like regimens were evalu-
ated because ATL was considered to be a type of NHL, but
the outcome was poor . Then, the LSG15 regimen
consisting of the drugs used in the CHOP regimen plus four
other drugs (ranimustine, vindesine, etoposide, and carbo-
platin) with the prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-
stimulating factor (G-CSF) was evaluated. In a phase III
trial, JCOG9801, this dose-intensified multiagent chemo-
therapy regimen was shown to be more effective than
CHOP-14 regimen, with a complete response rate of 40 %,
3-year OS of 24 %, and median survival time of 12.7 months
[18, 19]. However, since the outcome of this dose-intensified
regimen was still inferior to that in other PTCLs and B-cell
lymphomas, further improvement is necessary. In Western
countries, combination therapy with interferon-α and zidovu-
dine has been widely used for all disease subtypes of ATL. A
recently published meta-analysis suggested the effectiveness
of this combination therapy for ATL, especially leukemic
forms such as acute and chronic types .
Several new antibodies are currently under development
for the treatment of T-cell lymphoma. They are based on the
unique immunophenotypic features of ATL cells, which
express mature T-cell antigens such as CD2, CD25 (inter-
leukin [IL]-2 receptor), and CD52. Because of the unique
intense expression of CD25 compared to that in other
PTCL, monoclonal antibodies targeting the IL-2 receptor
(anti-Tac), either radiolabeled or unlabelled (daclizumab),
have been tested in patients with relapsed or refractory ATL.
However, the clinical efficacy appears to be limited . An
anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody (siplizumab) , anti-CD52
antibody (A24)  are also under development, but data are
Currently Available Therapeutic Agents for ATL
Pentostatin and sobuzoxane are chemotherapeutic agents
that were previously approved for the treatment of ATL in
Japan. Pentostatin, a purine nucleoside analog that inhibits
adenosine deaminase, has been reported to be effective for
236Curr Hematol Malig Rep (2012) 7:235–240
T-cell malignancies, including T-cell prolymphocytic leuke-
mia, CTCL, and PTCL . The clinical efficacy of pentos-
tatin was evaluated in patients with ATL from the 1980s to
1990s, and a phase II study of pentostatin revealed a re-
sponse rate of 32 % (10 of 31) in patients with relapsed or
refractory ATL . Other drugs that are often used in
patients with relapsed or refractory ATL are some combina-
tion chemotherapy regimens, including EPOCH (etoposide,
prednisolone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubi-
cin) and ESHAP (etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose
cytarabine and cisplatin); however, there is no apparent
evidence of an advantage of these combination chemothera-
pies over other therapeutic options. In the U.S., pralatrexate
and romidepsin have been approved for the treatment of
PTCL and can also be used for ATL. The efficacy of these
drugs for ATL is not clear because they have been evaluated
only in a very limited number of patients (the efficacy of
pralatrexate was evaluated in a clinical study in one patient)
CCR4 as a Novel Therapeutic Target
Chemokines act as signaling molecules in the migration and
tissue homing of various leukocytes. Among them, thymus
and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) and monocyte-
derived chemokine (MDC) induce the selective recruitment
of distinct subsets of T-cells through triggering of a chemo-
kine receptor, CCR4. CCR4 is a seven-transmembrane G-
protein coupled receptor and selectively expressed on Th2
cells and regulatory T cells [29, 30]. The expression on
normal cells such as Th2 cells can be partly regulated by
the ligand, especially MDC , while the regulation by the
ligands on cancer cells are not yet understood. Ishida et al.
analyzed 103 patients with ATL, and found that tumor cells
from about 90 % of patients showed CCR4 expression .
They also found that patients with CCR4-positive ATL were
more likely to have skin infiltration and had a worse out-
come than those with CCR4-negative ATL, indicating that
CCR4 played an important pathogenetic role in ATL . In
addition, Yoshie et al. found that the expression of CCR4
was increased in association of HTLV-1 and showed a
relationship to Fra-2/Jun D which induces downstream
genes such as c-Myb and SOX4, and MDM2 which pro-
motes growth and inhibits apoptosis . CCR4 is also
expressed on other types of PTCL (29 % of total cases;
PTCL-NOS, 38 %; AITL, 35 %; ALK-ALCL, 67 %; my-
cosis fungoides [MF], 41 %) . Jones et al. independently
reported that some types of PTCL expressed CCR4, as well
. In addition, analysis of 50 patients with PTCL-NOS
revealed that CCR4-positive patients had significantly
shorter survival than CCR4-negative patients . Nakagawa
et al. analyzed 51 patients with PTCL-NOS using the array
comparative genomic hybridization technique, and found that
patients with PTCL-NOS with genomic aberrations had a
outcome than those with PTCL-NOS without genomic aber-
rations . These findings resemble those observed in
patients with ATL. Although the role of CCR4 in the tumor-
igenesis and progression of PTCL-NOS has not been fully
elucidated, CCR4 seems to be a promising target molecule in
the treatment of PTCL as well as in ATL.
Clinical Trials of Mogamulizumab
Mogamulizumab/KW-0761 is a humanized monoclonal an-
tibody that recognizes the N-terminal region of human
CCR4 [37–39]. It is a therapeutic antibody produced using
a novel glycoengineering technology that enhances antibody-
dependent cellular cytotoxic (ADCC) activity . Mogamu-
lizumab and its human-mouse chimeric version, KM2760,
showed potent antitumor activity mediated by enhanced
ADCC against ATL cell lines and primary ATL cells in vitro
and in vivo [39, 41, 42].
A phase I clinical study (0761–0501 Study: Clinical-
Trials.gov Identifier NCT00355472) has been conducted in
patients with CCR4-positive relapsed PTCL, including ATL
[43•]. The primary objectives of the study were to assess the
safety of mogamulizumab, and analyze its maximum toler-
ated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics. The secondary
objectives were to determine the best overall response rate
(ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Mogamulizu-
mab was intravenously administered once a week for
4 weeks at four dose levels (0.01, 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg)
according to the conventional 3+3 design. Enrolled in the
study were 16 patients, of whom 13 had ATL (11 acute type,
2 lymphoma type), 1 had tumor-stage MF, and 2 had PTCL-
NOS. All 16 patients receiving mogamulizumab were in-
cluded in the safety and efficacy analyses. No dose-limiting
toxicity (DLT) was observed in any of the 13 patients who
received mogamulizumab at a dose of 0.01–1.0 mg/kg, and
thus MTD was not reached. Then, three additional patients
were enrolled to receive 1.0 mg/kg, the highest dose. One
patient showed grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 febrile neutro-
penia, and grade 3 skin eruption, but these adverse events
occurred in only 1 of the 6 patients who received a dose of
1.0 mg/kg, indicating that this drug would be tolerated at
least up to 1.0 mg/kg. The best ORR in the total 16 patients
was 31 % (of those, 2 had complete response [CR] and 3
had partial response [PR]), and the best ORR was also 31 %
in patients with ATL (of those, 2 had CR and another 2 had
PR). Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a plasma mogamu-
lizumab trough concentration of 7.5–19.6 μg/mL after the
1st to 4th administration of mogamulizumab at a dose of
1.0 mg/kg. These concentrations were sufficient to kill
Curr Hematol Malig Rep (2012) 7:235–240 237
primary ATL cells by ADCC activity in vitro (10 μg/mL).
After the 4th administration of mogamulizumab at a dose of
1.0 mg/kg, its plasma half-life was approximately 18 days,
which is comparable to the half-life (14 to 21 days) of
endogenous human IgG. Lastly, although MTD was not
reached, a tendency toward an increased incidence of grade
3 or higher toxicity was observed at 1.0 mg/kg. Therefore, it
was concluded that a dose of 1.0 mg/kg should be recommen-
ded for a subsequent phase II trial of this novel agent .
A subsequent phase II study of mogamulizumab (0761–
002 Study: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT 00920790)
was conducted in patients with CCR4-positive relapsed
ATL [45•]. The primary endpoint was the best ORR, and
the secondary endpoints included the best response of each
disease site such as peripheral blood ATL cells, skin and
nodal/extranodal lesions as well as PFS and OS. It was
planned for 25 patients to be enrolled for efficacy analysis,
assuming the expected ORR of 30 % with a 5 % threshold
response rate. Mogamulizumab was intravenously adminis-
tered once a week for 8 weeks at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg. In this
study, 28 patients in total were enrolled. Of these, 27
patients who received mogamulizumab were included in
the safety analysis, and 26 patients, excluding 1 patient
who was judged ineligible for enrollment after starting
mogamulizumab administration, were evaluated in the effi-
cacy analysis. Of the 27 patients who received mogamuli-
zumab, 14 had acute type, 6 lymphoma type, and 7 chronic
type with unfavorable prognostic factors. The best ORR was
50 % (13/26) including 8 CR. With the lower limit of the
95 % confidence interval (30 % to 70 %) exceeding the
threshold response rate of 5 %, the clinical efficacy of
mogamulizumab was confirmed. Responses according to
disease sites were 100 % (of 13 patients, all CR) for periph-
eral blood, 63 % (of 8 patients, 3 CR and 2 PR) for skin, and
25 % (of 12 patients, 3 CR/CRu) for nodal and extranodal
lesions. Median PFS and OS were 5.2 and 13.7 months,
respectively. The best ORR was also calculated for each
disease subtype, giving 43 % in patients with acute type
(of 14 patients, 5 CR and 1 PR), 33 % in patients with
lymphoma type (of 6 patients, 1 CR and 1 PR), and 83 %
in patients with unfavorable chronic type (of 6 patients, 2
CR and 3 PR). Thus, it was demonstrated that mogamuli-
zumab induced favorable responses in patients with any
disease subtype of ATL. In addition, for each age group,
the best ORR was 39 % (of 13 patients, 3 CR and 2 PR) in
patients younger than 65 years, and 62 % (of 13 patients, 5
CR and 3 PR) in patients 65 years or older. The most
common adverse events observed during the study were
lymphopenia (96 %), neutropenia (52 %), and thrombocyto-
penia (52 %) as hematologic toxicity, and acute infusion
reaction (89 %) and skin eruption (63 %) as non-
hematologic toxicity. There was no death related to mogamu-
lizumab in either the phase I or phase II study. Of 8 serious
adverse events with a relationship to mogamulizumab in the
phase I and II studies, 5 events including 4 cases of skin
eruption and 1 case of Stevens-Johnson syndrome occurred
during the phase II study. However, these reactions were
manageable with supportive measures including corticoste-
roid or other drugs in all patients. Considering the seriousness
of the disease, even skin eruption might be considered accept-
able for the treatment of ATL by treating physicians, while
close and appropriate follow-up of the event is necessary.
Elucidation of the mechanism of skin eruption and preventive
measures against it are awaited.
In the U.S., a phase I/II study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identi-
fier: NCT00888927) in patients with relapsed or refractory
PTCL including CTCL has been conducted . Mogamu-
lizumab was well tolerated at doses of 0.1–1.0 mg/kg in 42
patients including 1 with PTCL-NOS. MTD was not
reached and thus 1.0 mg/kg was chosen for subsequent
studies. A promising ORR of 42 % (of 38 evaluable patients
with CTCL, 3 CR and 13 PR) was achieved, although
expression of CCR4 on lymphoma cells was not mandatory
for patient enrolment in this particular phase I/II study.
Regarding subtypes of CTCL, ORR in Sezary syndrome
(SS) patients was 50 % and in MF patients was 36 %.
Eighty-seven percent of SS patients had a response in pe-
ripheral blood, with 50 % CR. Further study of mogamuli-
zumab is warranted in patients with nodal PTCL as well as
It is evident that there are limitations to improvement of the
treatment outcome of PTCL, especially ATL, with the cur-
rently available chemotherapeutic agents alone. Mogamuli-
zumab has a less severe toxicity profile and induces a high
response rate in patients with ATL, even in elderly patients.
Fig. 1 Ongoing clinical studies of mogamulizumab/KW-0761 for
peripheral T-cell lymphomas in Japan
238 Curr Hematol Malig Rep (2012) 7:235–240
Therefore, it may provide an effective treatment option for
the disease, especially for elderly patients who are not eligible
for intensive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem-cell
In Japan, based on the results of the clinical studies
mentioned above, a single-arm phase II study of mogamu-
lizumab monotherapy in patients with CTCL and PTCL
(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01192984) and a random-
ized phase II study of dose-intensified combination chemo-
therapy (mLSG15 regimen) with or without mogamulizumab
in untreated patients with ATL (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01173887) are being conducted as shown in Fig. 1.
Patient enrollment has already been completed in these phase
II studies. In the U.S., based on the aforementioned phase I/II
study in patients with relapsed or refractory CTCL, a pivotal
phase III study in patients with relapsed or refractory CTCL is
being planned. In conclusion, mogamulizumab is expected to
provide new, promising treatment options in patients with
ATL and other T-cell lymphomas.
in the multicenter clinical trials of mogamulizumab/KW-0761 in Japan.
Clinical studies of mogamulizumab were sponsored by Kyowa Hakko
Kirin Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
We thank all the investigators who participated
Ltd. and board membership for Merck, Mundipharma, Zenyaku,
Genzyme, Eisai, Symbio, Eli Lilly, Celgene, Kyowa-Kirin, Biomedics,
and Solasia Pharma; T. Takahashi: employee of Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co.
Ltd.; S. Akinaga: employee of Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co. Ltd.
K. Tobinai: research grant from Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co.
tive Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution,
and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and
the source are credited.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Crea-
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been
• Of importance
1. Ascani S, Zinzani PL, Gherlinzoni F, et al. Peripheral T-cell lym-
phomas. Clinico-pathologic study of 168 cases diagnosed accord-
ing to the R.E.A.L. Classification. Ann Onco. 1997;8:583–92.
2. Anderson JR, Armitage JO, Weisenburger DD. Epidemiology of
the non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: distributions of the major subtypes
differ by geographic locations. Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Classi-
fication Project. Ann Oncol. 1998;9:717–20.
3. Nakamura S, Koshikawa T, Koike K, et al. Phenotypic analysis of
peripheral T cell lymphoma among the Japanese. Acta Pathol Jpn.
Japan: analysis of 2260 cases, 2001–2006. Pathol Int. 2008;58:174–82.
5. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. WHO classification of tumors
6. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Non-Hodgkin’s
lymphomas. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
v.1.2010. Fort Washington, PA: NCCN; 2010.
7. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Brière J, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus
rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with
diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:235–42.
8. Friedberg JW, Cohen P, Chen L, et al. Bendamustine in patients
with rituximab-refractory indolent and transformed non-Hodgkin’s
lymphoma: results from a phase II multicenter, single-agent study.
J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:204–10.
9. Sandlund JT, Pui CH, Santana VM, et al. Clinical features and
treatment outcome for children with CD30+ large-cell non-
Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:895–8.
10. Vose J,ArmitageJ,WeisenburgerD. International T-CellLymphoma
Project. International peripheral T-cell and natural killer/T-cell lym-
phoma study: pathology findings and clinical outcomes. J Clin
11. Foss FM, Zinzani PL, Vose JM, et al. Peripheral T-cell lymphoma.
12. Sonoda S, Li HC, Tajima K. Ethnoepidemiology of HTLV-1 related
diseases:ethnic determinants ofHTLV-1 susceptibilityand its world-
wide dispersal. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:295–301.
13. Iwanaga M, Watanabe T, Utsunomiya A, et al. Human T-cell
leukemia virus type I (HTLV-1) proviral load and disease progres-
sion in asymptomatic HTLV-1 carriers: a nationwide prospective
study in Japan. Blood. 2010;116:1211–9.
14. Yamaguchi K, Watanabe T. Human T lymphotropic virus type-I and
15. Shimoyama M. Diagnostic criteria and classification of clinical sub-
types of adult T-cell leukaemia-lymphoma: A report from the Lym-
phoma Study Group (1984–87). Br J Haematol. 1991;79:428–37.
16. Tsukasaki K, Hermine O, Bazarbachi A, et al. Definition, prog-
nostic factors, treatment, and response criteria of adult T-cell
leukemia-lymphoma: a proposal from an international consensus
meeting. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:453–9.
17. Tobinai K. Clinical trials for human T-cell lymphotropic virus type
I-associated peripheral T-cell lymphoma in Japan. Semin Hematol.
2010;47 Suppl 1:S5–7.
18. Yamada Y, Tomonaga M, Fukuda H, et al. A new G-CSF-
supported combination chemotherapy, LSG15, for adult T-cell
leukaemia-lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study
9303. Br J Haematol. 2001;113:375–82.
19. Tsukasaki K, Utsunomiya A, Fukuda H, et al. VCAP-AMP-VECP
compared with biweekly CHOP for adult T-cell leukemia-
lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG9801. J
Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5458–64.
20. Bazarbachi A, Plumelle Y, Carlos Ramos J, et al. Meta-analysis on
the use of zidovudine and interferon-alfa in adult T-cell leukemia/
lymphoma showing improved survival in the leukemic subtypes. J
Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4177–83.
21. Waldmann TA. Daclizumab (anti-Tac, Zenapax) in the treatment of
leukemia/lymphoma. Oncogene. 2007;26:3699–703.
22. Zhang Z, Zhang M, Ravetch JV, et al. Effective therapy for a
murine model of adult T-cell leukemia with the humanized anti-
CD2 monoclonal antibody, MEDI-507. Blood. 2003;102:284–8.
model of adult T-cell leukemia with the humanized anti-CD52 mono-
clonal antibody, Campath-1H. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6453–7.
24. Ravandi F, Faderl S. Complete response in a patient with adult T-cell
leukemia (ATL) treated with combination of alemtuzumab and
pentostatin. Leuk Res. 2006;30:103–5.
25. Callens C, Moura IC, Lepelletier Y, et al. Recent advances in adult
T-cell leukemia therapy: focus on a new anti-transferrin receptor
monoclonal antibody. Leukemia. 2008;22:42–8.
26. Dearden CE. Role of single-agent purine analogues in therapy of
peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Semin Hematol. 2006;43:S22–6.
Curr Hematol Malig Rep (2012) 7:235–240239
27. Tobinai K. Current management of adult T-cell leukemia/lympho- Download full-text
ma. Oncology (Williston Park). 2009;23:1250–6.
28. O’Connor OA, Pro B, Pinter-Brown L, et al. Pralatrexate in patients
with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: results from
the pivotal PROPEL study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1182–9.
29. D'Ambrosio D, Iellem A, Bonecchi R, et al. Selective up-regulation
of chemokine receptors CCR4 and CCR8 upon activation of polar-
ized human type 2 Th cells. J Immunol. 1998;161:5111–5.
30. Iellem A, Mariani M, Lang R, et al. Unique chemotactic response
profile and specific expression of chemokine receptors CCR4
and CCR8 by CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells. J Exp Med.
31. Mariani M, Lang R, Binda E, et al. Dominance of CCL22 over
CCL17 in induction of chemokine receptor CCR4 desensiti-
zation and internalization on human Th2 cells. Eur J Immunol.
32. Ishida T, Utsunomiya A, Iida S, et al. Clinical significance of
CCR4 expression in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma: its close
association with skin involvement and unfavorable outcome. Clin
Cancer Res. 2003;9:3625–34.
33. Nakayama T, Hieshima K, Arao T, et al. Aberrant expression of
Fra-2 promotes CCR4 expression and cell proliferation in adult
T-cell leukemia. Oncogene. 2008;27:3221–32.
34. Ishida T, Inagaki H, Utsunomiya A, et al. CXC chemokine receptor
3 and CC chemokine receptor 4 expression in T-cell and NK-cell
lymphomas with special reference to clinicopathological signifi-
cance for peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified. Clin Cancer
35. Jones D, O'Hara C, Kraus MD, et al. Expression pattern of T-cell-
associated chemokine receptors and their chemokines correlates
with specific subtypes of T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood.
36. Nakagawa M, Nakagawa-Oshiro A, Karnan S, et al. Array compar-
ative genomic hybridization analysis of PTCL-U reveals a distinct
subgroup with genetic alterations similar to lymphoma-type adult T-
cell leukemia/lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:30–8.
37. Imai T, Nagira M, Takagi S, et al. Selective recruitment of CCR4-
bearing Th2 cells toward antigen-presenting cells by the CC che-
mokines thymus and activation-regulated chemokine and
macrophage-derived chemokine. Int Immunol. 1999;11:81–8.
38. Niwa R, Shoji-Hosaka E, Sakurada M, et al. Defucosylated chi-
meric anti-CC chemokine receptor 4 IgG1 with enhanced
antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity shows potent thera-
peutic activity to T-cell leukemia and lymphoma. Cancer Res.
39. Ishii T, Ishida T, Utsunomiya A, et al. Defucosylated humanized
anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody KW-0761 as a novel immuno-
therapeutic agent for adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Clin Cancer
40. Shinkawa T, Nakamura K, Yamane N, et al. The absence of fucose
but not the presence of galactose or bisecting N-acetylglucosamine
of human IgG1 complex-type oligosaccharides shows the critical
role of enhancing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. J Biol
41. Yano H, Ishida T, Imada K, et al. Augmentation of antitumour
activity of defucosylated chimeric anti-CCR4 monoclonal anti-
body in SCID mouse model of adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma
using G-CSF. Br J Haematol. 2008;140:586–9.
42. Ito A, Ishida T, Utsunomiya A, et al. Defucosylated anti-CCR4
monoclonal antibody exerts potent ADCC against primary ATLL
cells mediated by autologous human immune cells in NOD/Shi-scid,
IL-2R gamma(null) mice in vivo. J Immunol. 2009;183:4782–91.
43. • Yamamoto K, Utsunomiya A, Tobinai K, et al. Phase I study of
KW-0761, a defucosylated humanized anti-CCR4 antibody, in
relapsed patients with adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma and periph-
eral T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1591–8. This manu-
script describes the results of a phase I study of mogamulizumab
(KW-0761) in ATL and PTCL, showing encouraging therapeutic
efficacy with acceptable toxicity profiles.
44. Yamamoto K, Tobinai K, Akinaga S, et al. Reply to R. Suzuki. J
Clin Oncol. 2010;29:8356.
45. • IshidaT,JohT,UikeN,etal.Defucosylatedanti-CCR4monoclonal
multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:837–42. This
manuscript describes the results of a phase II study of mogamulizu-
mab/KW-0761 in relapsed patients with ATL, yielding a best overall
response rate of 50 % and median progression-free survival of
46. Duvic M, Pinter-Brown L, Foss FM, et al.: Results of a phase 1/2
study for KW-0761, a monoclonal antibody directed against
CC chemokine receptor type 4 (CCR4), in CTCL patients.
[abstract 962]. Presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the
American Society of Hematology. Orlando,USA;December4–7,
240 Curr Hematol Malig Rep (2012) 7:235–240