Content uploaded by Melissa Sánchez Herrera
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Melissa Sánchez Herrera on Jun 03, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
14
Biogeography of Dragonflies and Damselflies:
Highly Mobile Predators
Melissa Sánchez-Herrera and Jessica L. Ware
Department of Biology, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Newark Campus,
USA
1. Introduction
Dragonflies (Anisoptera) damselflies (Zygoptera) and Anisozygoptera comprise the three
suborders of Odonata (“toothed ones”), often referred to as odonates. The Odonata are
invaluable models for studies in ecology, behavior, evolutionary biology and biogeography
and, along with mayflies (Ephemeroptera), make up the Palaeoptera, the basal-most group
of winged insects. The Palaeoptera are thought to have diverged during the Jurassic
(Grimaldi and Engel, 2005; Thomas et al., 2011), and as the basal-most pterygote group,
odonates provide glimpses into the entomological past. Furthermore, few other insect
groups possess as strong a fossil record as the Odonata and its precursors, the Protodonata,
with numerous crown and stem group fossils from deposits worldwide.
Their conspicuous behavior, striking colors and relatively small number of species
(compared to other insect orders) has encouraged odonatological study. Odonates are
important predators during both their larval and adult stages. They are often the top
predators in freshwater ecosystems, such as rivers and lakes. One of their most remarkable
traits, however, is their reproductive behavior, which takes place in a tandem position with
the male and female engaging in a “copulatory wheel” (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Odonata copulatory wheel (modified from Eva Paulson illustration Aug, 2010).
www.intechopen.com
Global Advances in Biogeography
292
During the last 5 decades, our understanding about the ecology and evolution of Odonata
has increased dramatically (e.g., Cordoba-Aguilar, 2008). A fair odonate fossil record
coupled with recent advances in molecular techniques, have inspired several
biogeographical studies of Odonata. The aim in this chapter is to review current
understanding of odonate biogeography, to add new insights about the evolutionary history
of this order, and to evaluate the contribution of odonatology to our overall understanding
of biogeographical patterns. Furthermore, we discuss how this information may be used to
develop predictions about relationships between current environmental alterations, such as
climate change and deforestation, may affect the ranges and dispersal of Odonata. We also
frame Odonata biogeography in the context of developing better mechanisms for the
conservation of these important insects.
2. What are dragonflies and damselflies? Real hunters
The Odonata are one of the most ancient groups of extant insects. Fossils of the stem group
order Protoodonata (stem fossil group, containing no extant representatives), recognizable
progenitors of modern day dragonflies, date from middle Carboniferous Serpukhovian
sediments formed almost 325 million years ago (Brauckman & Zessin, 1989). One such
protoodonate, Meganeura, had a wingspan of over 30 cm (Brongniart, 1885; see Fig. 2 of
Typus permianus, another Meganeuridae), and extremely dense wing venation. Protoodonate
wing shapes suggest that they may have been capable of fast flight and although they were
likely as voracious as present day dragonflies (Corbet, 1999), they may have been less agile
due to their large size.
Fig. 2. The Protoodonate representative: Typus permianus forewing (modified from
Carpenter 1931).
The first crown group odonate fossils (crown group fossil = extant representatives exist)
date from the lower Permian period (ca. 250 million years ago); these fossils are not the huge
Carboniferous monsters of Protoodonata, but rather the Protoanisoptera and early proto-
zygopterans (Clarke, 1973; Carpenter, 1992; Wootton, 1981) were similar in size to modern
dragonflies. Although all modern odonates have aquatic or semi-terrestrial juvenile stages
(Watson, 1981), there is little fossil evidence to support that early odonates had aquatic
larvae (Pritchard, 1993; Wootton, 1981). Larvae fossils are unknown before the Mesozoic, but
by the Middle Triassic there is evidence the characteristic prehensile labium, ubiquitous in
modern-day larvae, and of differences among larval habits in some zygopterans
(coenagrionids) and anisozygoptererans. The former suggest that larvae possibly became
aquatic during the Lower Permian (Corbet, 1999).
Odonata are relatively generalized insects; as members of the “Hemimetabola” they do not
have a pupal stage between the larvae and the adult stage. Their larvae are confined to fresh
www.intechopen.com
Biogeography of Dragonflies and Damselflies: Highly Mobile Predators
293
or brackish waters and they develop rudimentary wing covers when they are about half
grown. They show an incredible diversity of forms depending on the characteristics of the
aquatic niche occupied, whether lentic or lotic.
2.1 Ecology and behavior
Dragonflies are voracious predators in larval and adult life stages, feeding exclusively on
living prey. Larvae detect prey visually and with mechanoreceptors (Fig. 3), primarily as sit-
and-wait predators. This is a successful strategy, in part due to a particularly distinctive
odonate larval characteristic: prehensile mouthparts (labium) that can be extended to
capture prey (Fig. 4 A). Several larger odonate taxa are considered top predators in the food
chain of their freshwater ecosystems. As adults, odonates usually eat small flying insects,
which they are able to detect using their globe-like eyes. Their spiny legs are used as a
basket to net prey and move it forward during flight to their strong mandibles (Fig. 4 A).
Most Odonata species feed during flight, which is not an easy task despite their being
exceptional flyers (Corbet, 1999).
Fig. 3. Odonata larvae. A. Dragonfly Macrothemis hageni. B. Damselfly Amphypteryx
longicaudata.
Dragonflies and damselflies have long slender abdomens, short antennae, huge spherical
eyes, (so large that they can sometimes make up the bulk of the head). Larval Zygoptera
have caudal gills and swim by paddling with their legs, whereas larval Anisoptera have
largely internal gills and move by jetting water from their abdomens. Adult Odonata have
long wings with a conspicuous nodus and a pterostigma (Fig. 4 B). The latter is weighted
and helps stabilize the wing during flight (Norberg, 1972). The wing apparently bends and
flexes rather widely around the nodus during flight.
www.intechopen.com
Global Advances in Biogeography
294
Fig. 4. A. Neopetalia punctata prenhesile labium. B. Pachydiplax longipennis wings showing the
conspicuous nodus and pterostigma. Images: Jessica Ware
Unique among all Ptergyota is the odonate method of copulation, which involves indirect
fertilization. Male dragonflies and damselflies have secondary genitalia at the base of their
abdomens. Sperm is produced in the testes and released from the abdomen tip and then
placed in the secondary copulatory organs on the underside of the second segment of the
abdomen prior to copulation. During copulation, the female receives sperm from the male’s
vesica spermalis, a secondary penile structure at the base of the male abdomen, into her bursa
copulatrix, or sperm storage organ. Females can mate multiple times, storing sperm in their
body for later use. In turn, the male secondary organ can remove or displace the sperm of
previous matings using the penes to increase their chances for paternity. Sperm competition
in odonates has made them a well-studied taxonomic group in the field of sexual selection
and reproductive behavior.
Fig. 5. Erythemis vesiculosa eating a Satyrinae butterfly. Image: Dr. Godfrey Bourne.
www.intechopen.com
Biogeography of Dragonflies and Damselflies: Highly Mobile Predators
295
2.2 Species diversity and biogeography
Recently, a monogeneric third suborder was recognized with two extant species from Japan
and the eastern Himalayas (Epiophlebia, Selys 1889; ). Anisozygopterans have some features
recalling Zygoptera, such as petiolate wings, and some of Anisoptera, such as robust
abdomens. Recent phylogenetic studies have reconstructed this suborder within the
Anisoptera, and thus (Anisoptera + Anisozygoptera) have been called Epiprocta (e.g.
Bechly, 1996, Lohmann, 1996; Bybee et al., 2008). Currently taxonomy suggests that there are
eleven families in Anisoptera: Aeshnidae, Austropetaliidae, Gomphidae, Petaluridae,
Cordulegastridae, Neopetaliidae, Chlorogomphidae, GSI (sensu Ware et al., 2007),
Corduliidae, Macromiidae and Libellulidae, with Epiophlebiidae from Anisozygoptera
considered by some to be an twelfth family of dragonflies. Although both Zygoptera and
Anisoptera have roughly 3000 species, Zygoptera are divided into 21 families:
Amphipterygidae, Calopterygidae, Chlorocyphidae, Coenagrionidae, Dicteriadidae,
Euphaeidae, Hemiphlebiidae, Isostictidae, Lestidae, Lestoidedidae, Megapodagrionidae,
Perilestidae, Philogangidae, Platycnemidae, Platystictidae, Polythoridae, Protoneuridae,
Pseudolestidae, Pseudostigmatidae, Synlestidae, and Thaumatoneuridae.
Present-day distribution of Odonata reflects millions of years of geographic isolation and
dispersal, coupled with adaptation over 300 million years of climate variation (Fig. 6). This
has contributed to considerable speciation and endemism (Samways, 1992, 2006),
particularly in the tropics, although speciation has been elevated among several Holarctic
Fig. 6. Current odonate species diversity distribution.
www.intechopen.com
Global Advances in Biogeography
296
taxa (e.g., Brown et al., 2000). In a warming global climate, current odonate biogeography
will undoubtedly change. The habitat requirements of high elevation taxa may leave some
montane specialists without suitable habitat (Samways, 1992, Stevens and Bailowitz, 2009),
while tropical, warm-adapted taxa may expand their ranges to higher latitudes. Increasing
isolation of populations in moist tropical environments due to deforestation, increasing
temperatures, and flow regulation, with arid and unsuitable habitat in between (Samways,
2006), may lead to species loss.
2.3 Dispersal in Odonata, flight behavior and migration
Many Odonata are highly mobile and have varying levels of dispersal capabilities (e.g.
Kormandy, 1961). Anax, the common green darner, Pantala, the wandering glider, and
several other odonates, in fact, are capable of migrating very long distances. The north-south
migration of Anax junius occurs for the most part in North America (e.g., Russell et al., 1998),
with migrants moving up to 2800 km south (Wilkelski et al., 2006; May, 2008). Gene flow
occurs among migrant and resident ‘subpopulations’ resulting in a panmictic population
(Freeland et al., 2003; Matthews et al., 2007). Pantala, a highly migratory dragonfly, is even
more cosmopolitan, with individuals found on all continents except Antarctica, although
they not equally common on all continents (McLachlan, 1896; Wakana, 1959; Reichholf, 1973;
Rowe, 1987; Russell et al., 1998; Corbet ,1999 ; Srygley, 2003; Feng et al., 2006; Buden, 2010).
Pantala uses passive dispersal for example, to cross the Indian Ocean (e.g. Anderson et al.,
2010;), while maintaining local island populations, such as those on Easter Island (Samways
and Osbourne, 1998). The other 25-50 putative migratory Odonata (Kormondy, 1961)
include Sympetrum corruptum, Erythrodiplax umbrata, several species of Tramea, and Libellula
quadrimaculata (Artiss, 2004). Most odonates are thought to migrate by taking advantage of
wind currents, and most migratory taxa are in the superfamily Libelluloidea.
Anisoptera are typically much stronger fliers than are damselflies. Heiser and Schmitt (2010)
suggested that the relative dispersal capabilities of dragonflies and damselflies differentially
influenced biogeographical patterns among Palaearctic taxa. An analysis of biogeographical
patterns for that region showed that Anisoptera biogeographical patterns reflected historical
vicariance and dispersal events, while relatively poorly dispersing Zygoptera showed
distributions that seemed to reflect more the effect of climate (Heiser and Schmitt, 2010).
However, dispersal capability alone does not determine observed biogeographical patterns.
For example, Hemicordulia, appears to be capable of dispersing but may be a poor competitor
(Dijkstra, 2007a, b), and its distribution may be more a reflection of simple vicariance.
3. Anisoptera phylogeny
Anisoptera are unequivocally monophyletic (e.g., Rehn 2004; Carle et al., 2008; Bybee et al.,
2008). Frustratingly, interfamilal relationships among taxa have remained in conflict due to
disagreements in recent phylogenetic hypotheses. In particular disagreement, yet of great
interest, is the placement of Gomphidae, which has been recovered as sister to the
Libelluloidea (e.g., Bybee et al., 2008, one analysis) and as sister to the Petaluroidea (e.g.,
Letsch, 2007). Gomphidae and Libelluloidea share exophytic oviposition behavior (i.e., eggs
laid outside of plant tissue) and both have reduced or vestigal ovipositors, their egg laying
aparati. Whether this is a synapomorphy or due to convergence is of phylogenetic interest.
www.intechopen.com
Biogeography of Dragonflies and Damselflies: Highly Mobile Predators
297
Molecular phylogeographical analyses in Anisoptera are few, but several non-molecular
studies directly or tangentially discuss anisopteran biogeography (e.g., Carle, 1995;
Leiftinck, 1977). Further complicating matters is the fact that there are relatively few studies
that have incorporated fossil and extant taxa in such analyses (with exceptions, see Bybee et
al., 2008). With as geographically vast and geologically ancient a group as dragonflies,
biogeographical analyses failing to incorporate fossils may not reveal much of their true
history and the potential past impacts of ancient vicariant events.
3.1 Biogeography of the dragonfly superfamily Libelluloidea and Australian
endemism
Ware et al. (2008) used molecular data to analyze the biogeography of an anisopteran taxon,
the libelluloid Syncordulia. Their analysis suggested that the biogeography of the endemic
South African taxon Syncordulia was a result of a southwestern Cape origin, approximately
60 million years ago. Syncordulia is a member of the family Synthemistidae s.s. (called “GSI”
by Ware et al., 2007; previously considered to be members of the Corduliidae s.l.). The other
taxa in this family are mostly Australasian endemics. The region studied has a high level of
dragonfly endemism. Within the GSI, only Gomphomacromia (South American), Idionyx and
Macromidia (IndoMalayan), and Oxygastra (Europe) are found outside of Australia and New
Zealand, although other New World taxa, such as Lauromacromia, or Neocordulia, and
African taxa such as Neophya, whose phylogenetic position have yet to be determined may
ultimately be determined to be members of the Synthemistidae. The fossil record, however,
suggests a more widespread distribution for several present-day Australasian endemics.
The Mesozoic fossil taxon Cretaneophya, for example, thought to be sister to the extant West
African Neophya, has been found in fossil deposits in Southeastern England (Jarzembowski
& Nel, 1996). Similarly, the Argentinian fossil Palaeophya argentina is a putative member of
the Cordulephyidae, a taxonomic group whose extant representatives are restricted to
Australia (Petrulevicius & Nel, 2009).
Libelluloidea has been estimated to diverge during the Jurassic (e.g., Thomas et al., 2011) or
Early Cretaceous (Jarzembowski & Nel, 1996; Fleck et al., 2008). Although at that time the
continents were still in close proximity, the break-up of the supercontinent of Pangaea
created the southwest Indian Ocean rift, splitting South America + Africa from East
Gondwanaland and moving India away from Antarctica, and the North Atlantic- Caribbean
rift, which separated Laurasia from South America and Africa (Dietz & Holden, 1970). If
ancestral Libelluloidea (Fig. 7 A, B)were present on all landmasses, the subsequent isolation
resulted in geographical vicariance that may have influenced divergence. Our unpublished
estimate for the divergence of non-cordulegastrid taxa was 132 Mya, based on molecular
data and estimated using a BEAST Bayesian analysis. This age estimate is similar to that of
Carle (1995), who suggested that the radiation of non-cordulegastrid Libelluloidea began ‘at
least 140 million years ago’. During the early Cretaceous, Gondwanaland began to break
apart more fully (e.g., Veevers, 2004), creating geographical barriers to dispersal and the
isolation of populations. Vicariant events such as those have been suggested to drive the
rate of speciation (e.g., Nelson, 1969; Rosen, 1975, 1978; Platnick & Nelson, 1978; Nelson &
Rosen, 1980; Nelson & Platnick, 1981; Wiley, 1981). Tectonics may have resulted in increased
uplift and increased inland water habitat (e.g., Hallam, 1993), and the occurrence of
additional water sources may have encouraged Odonata dispersal.
www.intechopen.com
Global Advances in Biogeography
298
By far the most extensive biogeographical study of Afrotropical libelluloid taxa was
undertaken by Dijkstra (2007), who evaluated current distributions of odonates in tropical
Africa and retrodicted past biogeographical patterns. African taxa are far less species rich
than their Neotropical or Asian congeners; for example, African Aeshnidae, for example
include 39 species among 5 genera, while there are 127 species among 15 genera in the
Neotropics, and 138 species among 18 genera in the Orient (Dijkstra, 2007). Although
species richness is low in several African regions, there are high levels of endemism (e.g.,
Clausnitzer & Dijkstra, 2005; Dijkstra, 2007).
Fig. 7. Several Odonate taxa involved in the biogeographical studies. A. Georgia River
Crusier (Macromia georgina) B. Painted Skimmer (Libellula semifaciata) C. Sparkling Jewelwing
(Calopteryx dimidiata) D. Slender Bluelet (Enallagma traviatum) E. Rubyspot (Hetaerina occisa)
F. Megapodagrionidae (Teinopodagrion macropus) and G. Citrine Forktail (Ischnura hastata).
Images A,B,C,D copyright from Dan Irizarry and Images E, F and G copyright from Adolfo
Cordero.
4. Biogeography of Zygoptera
These slender and often rather small odonates are still taxonomically unresolved. Rehn
(2003) proposed phylogenetic hypotheses that supported zygopteran monophyly based on
morphological characters: nine morphological synapomorphies support Zygoptera.
However several molecular Odonata phylogenetic analyses have failed to recover
damselflies as a monophyletic group (Hasegawa & Kasuya, 2006, Saux et al., 2003).
Recently, Bybee and colleagues (2008) used both molecular and morphological data and
supported the monophyletic status of this taxon, suggesting that molecular data alone fails
www.intechopen.com
Biogeography of Dragonflies and Damselflies: Highly Mobile Predators
299
to recover a monophyletic Zygoptera due in part to limited taxon sampling. Nevertheless,
internal familial relationships within the suborder remaining tangled, with families such as
Megapodagrionidae, Perilestidae, Amphypteridae, Coenagrionidae, and Protoneuridae
examples of putatively paraphyletic groups that will likely need to be reclassified (Bybee et
al. 2008).
A limited number of studies have explored the effects of key biogeographical events on
individual damselfly taxa (De Marmels, 2001; Dumont et al., 2005; Groeneveld et al., 2007;
Polhemus, 1997; Turgeon et al., 2005). Today, patterns of damselfly distributions coincide
with climatological zones: as temperature increases near the equator so too does the
diversity of Zygoptera increase (Kalkman et al, 2008). Tropical regions hold the greatest
number of species, and it has been suggested that this high diversity can be explained by
aquatic habitat abundance in tropical forest (Orr, 2006). Moreover, tropical mountains
provide a diversity of niches and regional refugia (Kalkman et al., 2008). The limited
seasonality of tropical habitats increases the opportunities for specialist life-styles, thereby
supporting the high diversity of tropical odonates and other taxa.
Within the damselflies the most successful family is indisputably the Coenagrionidae, in
part due likely to their capacity for colonization. This family has been recovered as
paraphyletic in recent systematic work (Bybee et al., 2008; O’Grady & May, 2003). Within
this family, several genera (Enallagma, Ischnura, Melagrion) show a broad range of
biogeographical patterns (Polhemus, 1997; Brown et al., 2000; Turgeon et al., 2002).
Enallagma damselflies (Fig. 7 D) are present on all continents except Australia and Antarctica
(Bridges, 1997). Their distribution shows two centers of diversification: North America and
sub-Saharan Africa, with scattered species around the Asian and Palaearctic regions (Brown
et al., 2000). This genus is one of the most species rich in North America, with 38 described
species (Westfall & May, 1996). Recent molecular phylogenetic reconstructions of the
Nearctic members of this genus suggest a radiation that relied on two recent progenitor
lineages, the "E. hageni" and "E. carunculatum" clades (Brown et al., 2000). Turgeon et al.
(2005) explored the diversification history of Enallagma across the Holarctic region using
previous molecular phylogenetic work (Brown et al., 2000; Turgeon et al., 2002) and AFLP's
as population genetic markers among species. There they suggested that the recent radiation
of Enallagma was due to strong climate variation during Quaternary epoch.
The fork-tail damselflies (Ischnura, Fig.7 G) are the smallest members of the Coenagrionidae
but have colonized most continents. Some species show female color polymorphism (e.g., I.
e.g., ramburii; Cordero, 1990b, 1992; Fincke, 1987, 2004; Hinnekint, 1987; Johnson, 1964, 1966,
1975; Robertson, 1985; Robinson & Allgeyer, 1996; Sirot et al., 2003) and sperm competition
(Cooper et al., 1996; Cordero, 1990a; Cordero & Miller, 1992; Miller, 1987; Waage, 1984).
Recently, Ischnura hastata, a widespread species, was found to exhibit parthenogenesis in
populations only in the Azores islands (Cordero et al., 2005), making this genus a good model
for more extensive biogeographical analyses. Chippindale et al. (1999) explored phylogenetic
relationships among North American Ischnura species, reporting a recent diversification along
a latitudinal gradient. Realpe (2010) described two new species present in high altitudes of the
Andes Cordillera in South America, and unpublished molecular data of those species suggest
evidence of a recent radiation across elevation in the Neotropics (Realpe & Sanchez-Herrera,
pers. comm.). The great dispersal ability of some fork-tail damselflies may have contributed to
multiple rapid radiation events through their evolutionary history.
www.intechopen.com
Global Advances in Biogeography
300
Megalagrion is one of the most species rich genera in the Pacific Region (Donelly, 1990). This
genus contains 23 described species found on all the main Hawaiian Islands (Polhemus &
Asquith, 1996; Daigle, 1996; Polhemus, 1997). Endemicity and species richness appear
related to island age (Jordan et al., 2003). Molecular data on these species reveals two basic
diversification patterns across the islands (Jordan et al., 2003). Some species dispersed in
tandem as new islands were created, and over time those founding populations have lead to
endemic species and assemblages on each island. Still other taxa show an adaptive burst as a
single representative of a lineage colonized new islands (Jordan et al., 2003).
The family Megapodagrionidae (Fig. 7 F) appears to be paraphyletic (Bybee et al., 2008). De
Marmels (2001) morphologically revised the Neotropical genus complex Megapodagrion s.str.
(Megapodagrion, Allopodagrion and Teionopodaprion) which are distributed throughout South
America. He suggested that high speciation rates in South American tropical forests were
due to orogenic development of the southeastern Brazilian mountains and the Andes in
Oligocene/Miocene times. Furthermore, he reported high degree of specialization within
genera for particular Neotropical forests. Finally, he suggested a closer morphological
relationship of this complex to taxa in the Malayan and Austral-Papuan region, based on the
penile morphology (De Marmels, 2001).
The family Pseudostigmatidae is strikingly large but is restricted to Central and South
America lowland montane forests (Fincke, 1992). The largest extant odonate is the helicopter
damselfly Megaloprepus coerulatus with a wingspan approximately of 19 cm and an abdomen
length of 10 cm. Recently, Groeneveld et al. (2007) addressed the evolution of gigantism
among members of this family and an Eastern Africa endemic species, Coryphagrion grandis.
The latter species had been placed in the family Megapodagrionidae; however, their habitat
preferences, morphology, and behavior suggest they either lie in a monogeneric family or
fall in the Pseudostigmatidae (Clausnitzer & Lindeboom, 2002; Rehn, 2003). Using molecular
data from representative species of Pseudostigmatidae and Coryphagrion, Groeneveld et al.
(2007?) suggest that gigantism evolved only once through the evolutionary history of this
taxa. Their results support that gigantism in the endemic African genus was a reflection of
phylogenetic history, and that this genus was a Gondwanaland relict (Groeneveld et al.,
2007).
The family Calopterygidae is a monophyletic family within the Zygoptera (Bybee et al.,
2008, Dumont et al., 2005). It is distributed worldwide, except for the Australasian region.
All of the members of this family share remarkably similar habitat requirements (running
waters) and morphology; however, males show a variety of mating displays (Buchholtz,
1995; Heymer, 1972). Dumont et al. (2005) evaluated phylogenetic relationships among
species, but due to sparse Neotropical taxon sampling intrafamilial relationships remain
unclear. Nevertheless, recent molecular phylogenetics among the Calopterygidae have
clarified some biogeographical patterns (Dumont et al., 2005; Mullen & Andres, 2007). Fossil
evidence and molecular dating techniques indicated that this family arose approximately
175 Ma and underwent rapid diversification approximately 150 Ma during the Cretaceous
period (Dumont et al., 2005). Several Gondwanaland disjunctions exist among these taxa,
such as the relictual distributions of Irydictyon and Noguchiphaea. Dumont et al. (2005) also
reported that temperate taxa, such as Calcopteryx (Fig. 7 C), were affected by Pleistocene
glaciation. Recently, Mullen and Andres (2007) used molecular systematic and phylogenetic
methods on Calcopteryx and suggesting that this taxon has been present since the Miocene
www.intechopen.com
Biogeography of Dragonflies and Damselflies: Highly Mobile Predators
301
age; furthermore, they suggest that reproductive displays may be a result of reinforcement
or ecological character displacement dating from when isolated populations came into
secondary contact. Phylogenetic relationships remain unclear in the Neotropical genus
Hetaerina (Fig. 7 E), despite the fact that unlike other confamilial genera male genitalia are
strongly divergent, suggesting mechanical isolation (Garrison, 1990).
Forest damselflies in the family Platystictidae are restricted to Central and northern South
America, and to tropical Southeast Asia. Morphological and molecular data indicate they
are a monophyletic taxon (Bechly, 1996; Rehn, 2003; van Tol et al., 2009). These forest
dwellers have poor flying capacity, suggesting low dispersal capability, which is reflected in
the small distributional ranges of most species (van Tol et al., 2009). Molecular analysis
recovered Neotropical genera as the basal-most clades within the family. However, the
morphological analyses suggest that Sinosticta ogati from southeastern China is instead the
sister taxon to all other members of the family. Consequently, the ancestor of the family may
have evolved in the Palaearctic and the Oriental regions (van Tol et al., 2009). This type of
distribution has been recognized among other organisms, such as the Neotropical plant
genus Trigonobalanus (van der Hammen & Cleef, 1983), and it is known as a “tropical
amphitranspacific distribution” (van Steenis, 1962). This pattern is ascribed to dispersal
from Africa to the northern hemisphere during the Late Cretaceous, with subsequent
extinction in Africa due to Neogene desertification (Raven & Axelrod, 1974). van Tol et al.
(2009) hypothesized an origin in eastern Africa, suggesting that the ancestor of this family
evolved in eastern Gondwana, with subsequent dispersal into South America, Asia, and
New Guinea. Although the family includes Neotropical taxa, additional Neotropical
sampling is needed to test this hypothesis.
Finally, the distribution of members of the Afrotropical family Platycnemidae has been
suggested to be the result of insular island biogeography. Dijkstra et al. (2007) described
Platycnemis pembipes, a new species from the Pemba Island of Tanzania. He examined the
morphology of all members of this genus, concluding that the new species was more related
to Malagasy taxa than to Guineo-Congolian species, which have affinity to tropical Asia. The
distribution of this new species suggests a remarkable colonization event probably due to
wind dispersal across the Mozambique channel (Dijkstra et al., 2007).
Overall, many biogeographical mechanisms that have been proposed using damselflies as
model organisms, but more thorough sampling and a greater variety of ecological
experimentation is needed to further advance understanding of damselfly evolution and
biogeography.
5. Conclusion
The biogeography of Odonata is a rich area of study that needs further attention. As one of
the basal-most taxa in Insecta (Grimaldi and Engel, 2005), our understanding of the origin of
flying insects will be greatly improved by additional study, particularly through research
that includes thorough analyses of stem and crown group taxa. Future work should explore
the biogeography of lesser-studied zygopteran groups from South America, and expand
understanding of species rich groups like the Libelluloidea and Gomphidae. Dragonflies
and damselflies have been heralded as model indicators for climate change, due in part to
their great dispersal capabilities, and earlier emergence has been documented in our
www.intechopen.com
Global Advances in Biogeography
302
warming climate (e.g., Hassell et al., 2007). Range expansion of tropical taxa is predicted into
higher latitudes. Although some Odonata ranges fluctuate with environmental changes,
northward range expansions have been reported over the last 40 years among several
European taxa (e.g., Hickling et al., 2005). The future biogeographical distribution of
Odonata undoubtedly will be influenced directly and indirectly by anthropogenically-
altered climate.
6. Acknowledgments
J.W. and M. S. H. acknowledge internal funding from Rutgers University in Newark.
Moreover we thank Dr. Godfrey Bourne, Dan Irizarry, Dr. Adolfo Cordero and Eva Paulson
for sharing the amazing pictures we used in our figures. Finally, we acknowledge Dr. Larry
Stevens for the review edits that enrich our chapter.
7. References
Anderson, R.C. (2009). Do dragonflies migrate across the western Indian Ocean? Journal of
Tropical Ecology, 25, 347–348.
Artiss, T. (2004). Phylogeography of a facultatively migratory dragonfly, Libellula
quadrimaculata (Odonata: Anisoptera). Hydrobiologia 515, 225–234.
Bechly, G. (1996). Morphologische Untersuchungen am Flügelgeäder der rezenten Libellen
und deren Stammgruppenvertreter (Insecta; Pterygota; Odonata). unter besonderer
Berücksichtigung der Phylogenetischen Systematik und des Grundplanes der
Odonata. Petalura, special vol. 2, 402 pp.
Brauckmen, C. & Zessin, W. (1989). Neue Meganeuridae aus dem Namurium von Hagen–
Vorhalle (BRD). und die Phylogenie der Meganisoptera (Insecta, Odonata).
Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift 36, 177–215, pl 3–8.
Brongniart, C. (1885). Les insectes fossiles des terrains primaires. Coup d’oeil rapide sur la
faune entomologique des terrains paléozoïques. Bulletin of the Societe Amis Sci. nat.
Rouen, 1885, 50–68.
Brown, J. M., M. A. McPeek & May, M. L. (2000). A phylogenetic perspective on habitat
shifts and diversity in the North American Enallagma damselflies. Systematic
Biology, 49, 697–712.
Buden, D. W. (2010). Pantala flavescens (Insecta: Odonata) rides west winds into sal. Pacific
Science, 64, 141–143.
Bybee, S.M., Ogden, H.T., Branham, M.A. & Whiting, M.F. (2008). Molecules, morphology
and fossils: a comprehensive approach to odonate phylogeny and the evolution of
the odonate wing, Cladistics, 23, 1–38.
Carle, F.L. (1995). Evolution, taxonomy, and biogeography of ancient Gondwanian
libelluloides, with comments on anisopteroid evolution and phylogenetic
systematics (Anisoptera: Libelluloidea). Odonatologica, 24, 383–506.
Carpenter, F.M. (1992). Volume 3: Superclass Insecta. In R.C. Moore, R.L. Kaesler, E. Brosius,
J. Kiem and J. Priesener, (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part R,
Arthropoda 4. Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society of America; and Lawrence,
Kansas: University of Kansas Press. 665 p.
www.intechopen.com
Biogeography of Dragonflies and Damselflies: Highly Mobile Predators
303
Chippindale, P.T. et al., (1999). Phylogenetic Relationships of North American Damselflies
of the Genus Ischnura (Odonata: Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Based on Sequences
of Three Mitochondrial Genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11(1), 110–121.
Corbet, P. S. (1999). Dragonflies: Behavior and ecology of Odonata. Cornell University Press.
Ithaca, New York.
Cooper, G., Miller, P. L., and Holland, P. W. H. 1996. Moleculargenetic analysis of sperm
competition in the damselfly Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden). Proc. R. Soc. London
B 263: 1343–1349.
Cordero, A. 1990a. The adaptive significance of the prolongued copulations of the
damselfly, Ischnura graellsii (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Anim. Behav. 40: 43–48.
Cordero, A. 1990b. The inheritance of female polymorphism in the damselfly Ischnura
graellsii (Rambur) (Odonata:Coenagrionidae).Heredity 64: 341–346.
Cordero, A. 1992. Density-dependent mating success and colour polymorphism in females
of the damselfly, Ischnura graellsii (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 769–
780.
Cordero, A., and Miller, P. L. 1992. Sperm transfer, displacementand precedence in Ischnura
graellsii (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30: 261–267.
Cordero Rivera, A.; M.O. Lorenzo Carballa; C. Utzeri & V. Vieira. 2005. Parthenogenetic
Ischnura hastata (Say), widespread in the Azores (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae).
Odonatologica, 34: 1-9.
Córdoba–Aguilar, A. (2008). Introduction. In: A. Córdoba–Aguilar (editor), Dragonflies and
Damselflies: Study Models in Ecological and Evolutionary Research. Oxford University
Press, Oxford, Pp. 1–3.
De Marmels J. (2001). Revision of Megapodagrion Selys, 1886 (Insecta, Odonata:
Megapodagrionidae). (Diss. Doctor sci. nat.), Math.–naturwiss. Fak. Univ. Zurich.
Zurich (Suiza). Pp. 218.
Dietz, R. S. & Holden, J. C. (1970). Reconstruction of Pangaea: breakup and dispersion of
continents, Permian to present. Jour. Geophys. Res., 75 (26), 4939–4956.
Dijkstra, K.–D.B. (2007). Demise and rise: the biogeography and taxonomy of the Odonata of
tropical Africa. In: Dijkstra, K.–D.B. (Editor). Demise and rise: the biogeography and
taxonomy of the Odonata of tropical Africa. PhD Thesis, Leiden University. 143–187.
Dijkstra, K.–D.B. (2007b). Gone with the wind: westward dispersal across the Indian Ocean
and island speciation in Hemicordulia dragonflies (Odonata: Corduliidae). Zootaxa
1438, 27–48.
Feng, H.; K. Wu, Y. Ni, D. Cheng, & Guo, Y. (2006). Nocturnal migration of dragonflies over
the Bohai Sea in northern China. Ecol. Entomol. 31, 511–520.
Fincke, O. M. 1987. Female monogamy in the damselfly Ischnura verticalis Say (Odonata:
Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica 16: 129–143.
Fincke, O.M. 2004. Polymorphic signals from harassed females and the males that learn
them support a novel frequency-dependent model. Animal Behavior 67:833-845
Fraser, F. C. (1943). A note on the 1941 immigration of Sympetrum fonscolombii (Selys).
(Odon.). J. Soc. Br. Entomol., 2, 133–136.
Fraser, F. C. (1945). Migration of Odonata. Entomol. Monthly Mag., 81,73–74.
Freeland, J. R., M. May, R. Lodge, & Conrad, K. F. (2003). Genetic diversity and widespread
haplotypes in a migratory dragonfly, the common green darner Anax junius.
Ecological Entomology, 28, 413–421.
www.intechopen.com
Global Advances in Biogeography
304
Garrison, R. W. (1990) A synopsis of the genus Hetaerina with descriptions of four new
species (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Transactions of the American Entomological
Society, 116(l): 175-259
Grimaldi, D. & Engel, M.S. (2005). Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press.
Heiser, M. & Schmitt, T. (2010). Do different dispersal capacities influence the biogeography
of the western Palearctic dragonflies (Odonata)? Biological Journal of the Linnean
Society, 99, 177–195.
Jarzembowski, E.A. & Nel, A. (1996). New fossil dragonflies from the Lower Cretaceous of
SE England and the phylogeny of the superfamily Libelluloidea (Insecta: Odonata).
Cretaceous Research 17, 67–85.
Johnson, C. 1964. The inheritance of female dimorphism in in the damselfly Ischnura damula.
Genetics 49: 513–519.
Johnson, C. 1966. Genetics of female dimorphism in Ischnura demorsa. Heredity 21: 453–459.
Johnson, C. 1975. Polymorphism and natural selection in ischnuran damselflies. Evol. Theory
1: 81–90.
Kormondy, E. J. (1961). Territoriality and dispersal in dragonflies (Odonata). J. N.Y. Entomol.
Soc., 69, 42–52.
Lieftinck, M. A. (1962). Insects of Micronesia, Odonata. Insects Micronesia 5, 1–95.
Lieftinck, M.A. (1977). New and little known Corduliidae (Odonata: Anisoptera). from the
Indo–Pacific region. Oriental Insects, 11(2), 157–159.
May, M. L., & Matthews, J. H. (2008). Migration in Odonata: a case study of Anax junius, pp.
63–77. In A. Cordoba–Aguilar, (ed.), Dragonflies and Damselflies. Model Organisms for
Ecological and Evolutionary Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Matthews, J.H., S. Boles, C. Parmesan & Juenger, T. (2007). Isolation and characterization of
nuclear microsatellite loci for the common green darner dragonfly Anax junius
(Odonata: Aeshnidae). to constrain patterns of phenotypic and spatial diversity.
Molecular Ecology Notes.
McLachlan, R. 1896. Oceanic migration of a nearly cosmopolitan dragonfly (Pantala
flavescens, F.). Entomol Mon. Mag. 7, 254.
Nelson, G., & Platnick, N. I. (1981). Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and
Vicariance. Columbia University Press, New York, 567 p.
Norberg, R. A. (1972). The pterostigma of insect wings as an inertial regulator of wing pitch.
J. Comp. Physiol. 81, 9–22.
O'Grady, E.W. & May, M.L. (2003). A phylogenetic reassessment of the subfamilies of
Coenagrionidae(Odonata: Zygoptera). Journal of Natural History 37, 2807–2834.
Peck, S. B. (1992). The dragonflies and damselflies of the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador
(Insecta: Odonata). Psyche (Camb.). 99, 309–322.
Petrulevičius, J. F. & Nel, A. (2009). First Cordulephyidae dragonfly in America: A new
genus and species from the Paleogene of Argentina (Insecta: Odonata). Comptes
Rendus Palevol, 8 (4), 385–388.
Pilgrim, E. (2007).Systematics of the sympetrien dragonflies with emphasis on the
phylogeny, taxonomy, and historical biogeography of the genus Sympetrum
(Odonata: Libellulidae). Utah State University, 154 pp.
Pritchard, G., McKee, M. H., Pike, E. M., Scrimgeour, G. J. & Zloty, J. (1993). Did the first
insects live in water or air? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 49, 31–44.
www.intechopen.com
Biogeography of Dragonflies and Damselflies: Highly Mobile Predators
305
Raven, P.H., & Axelrod, D.I. (1974). Angiosperm biogeography and past continental
movements. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 61, 539–673.
Realpe, E. (2010). Two new Andean species of the genus Ischnura Charpentier from
Colombia, with a key to the regional species (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae).
Odonatologica 39(2), 121–131.
Reichholf, J. (1973). A migration of Pantala flavescens (Fabricius, 1798). along the shore of
Santa Catarina, Brazil (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica (Utr.). 2, 121–124.
Rosen, D. E. (1975). A vicariance model of Caribbean biogeography. Syst. Zool. 24, 431–464.
Rosen, D. E. (1978). Vicariant patterns and historical explanation in bio– geography.
Systematic Zoology, 27, 159–188.
Rowe, R. J. (1987). The dragonflies of New Zealand. Auckland University Press, Auckland,
New Zealand.
Russell, R. W.; M. L. May, K. L. Soltesz, & Fitzpatrick, J. W. (1998). Massive swarm
migrations of dragonflies (Odonata) in eastern North America. Am. Midl. Nat.
140,325–342.
Samways, M.J. (1992). Dragonfly conservation in South Africa: a biogeographical
perspective. Odonatologica, 21, 165–180.
Samways, M. J., & Osborn, R. (1998). Divergence in a transoceanic circumtropical dragonfly
on a remote island. J. Biogeogr., 25, 935–946.
Samways, M.J. (2006). National Red List of South African dragonflies (Odonata).
Odonatologica 35, 341–368.
de Selys Longchamps, E. de, (1889). Palaeophlebia. Nouvelle leagion de Calopterygides. Suivi
de la description d’une nouvelle gomphine du Japon: Tachopteryx pryeri. Annales de
la Societeal Entomologique de Belgique 33, 153–159.
Stevens, L. E. & Bailowitz, R. A. 2009. Odonata Biogeography in the Grand Canyon
Ecoregion, Southwestern USA. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 102 (2),
261-274.
Srygley, R. B. (2003). Wind drift compensation in migrating dragonflies Pantala (Odonata:
Libellulidae). J. Insect Behav. 16, 217–232.
Thomas, J.A., Trueman, J.W.H., Rambaut A. & Welch, J.J. (in press). Relaxed Phylogenetics
and the Palaeoptera Problem: Resolving Deep Ancestral Splits in the Insect
Phylogeny.
Turgeon,J., Stoks,R., & Thum, R.A., et al. (2005). Simultaneous Quaternary Radiations of
Three Damselfly Clades across the Holarctic. The American Naturalist 165(4), 78–107.
van der Hammen, T and A. M. Cleef (1983) Trigonobalanus and the Tropical Amphi-Pacific
Element in the North Andean Forest. Journal of Biogeography. 10(5), 437-440.
van Steenis, C.G.G.J., 1962. The land-bridge theory in botany, with particular reference to
tropical plants. – Blumea 11: 235-542.
van Tol, J., Reijnen, B. T. & Thomassen, H. A. (2009). Phylogeny and biogeography of the
Platystictidae (Odonata). pp. 3–70 In: van Tol, J. Phylogeny and biogeography of the
Platystictidae (Odonata). PhD. thesis, University of Leiden. x + 294pp.
Wakana, I. 1959. On the swarm and migratory flight of Pantala flavescens, an observation in
Kawagoe area. Tombo 1, 26 –30 [in Japanese with English summary].
Ware, J.L., May, M.L., & Kjer, K.M. (2007). Phylogeny of the higher Libelluloidea
(Anisoptera: Odonata): An exploration of the most speciose superfamily of
dragonflies, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 45, 289–310.
www.intechopen.com
Global Advances in Biogeography
306
Ware, J. L.; Simaika, J. P., Samways, & M. (2009). Biogeography and divergence estimation
of the relic Cape dragonfly genus Syncordulia: global significance and implications
for conservation. Zootaxa, 2216, 22–36
Wiley, E. O. (1981). Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. John
Wiley and Sons, New York.
Wikelski,M.,D., Moskowitz, J.S., Adelman, J., Cochran, D.S. Wilcove & May, M. L. (2006).
Simple rules guide dragonfly migration. Biology Letters, 1–5.
Wootton, R.J. (1981). Palaeozoic insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 26,319–344.
Watson, J. A. L. (1983). A truly terrestrial dragonfly larva from Australia (Odonata:
Corduliidae). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 21, 309–11.
www.intechopen.com
Global Advances in Biogeography
Edited by Dr. Lawrence Stevens
ISBN 978-953-51-0454-4
Hard cover, 360 pages
Publisher InTech
Published on line 30, March, 2012
Published in print ed ition March, 2012
InTech Europe
University Campus STeP Ri
Slavka Krautzeka 83/A
51000 Rijeka, Croatia
Phone: +385 (51) 770 447
Fax: +385 (51) 686 166
www.intechopen.com
InTech China
Unit 405, Office Block, Hotel Equatorial Shanghai
No.65, Yan An Road (West), Shanghai, 200040, China
Phone: +86-21-62489820
Fax: +86-21-62489821
Global Advances in Biogeography brings together the work of more than 30 scientific authorities on
biogeography from around the world. The book focuses on spatial and temporal variation of biological
assemblages in relation to landscape complexity and environmental change. Global Advances embraces four
themes: biogeographic theory and tests of concepts, the regional biogeography of individual taxa, the
biogeography of complex landscapes, and the deep-time evolutionary biogeography of macrotaxa. In addition,
the book provides a trove of new information about unusual landscapes, the natural history of a wide array of
poorly known plant and animal species, and global conservation issues. This book is well illustrated with
numerous maps, graphics, and photographs, and contains much new basic biogeographical information that is
not available elsewhere. It will serve as an invaluable reference for professionals and members of the public
interested in global biogeography, evolution, taxonomy, and conservation.
How to reference
In order to correctly reference this scholarly work, feel free to copy and paste the following:
Melissa Sánchez-Herrera and Jessica L. Ware (2012). Biogeography of Dragonflies and Damselflies: Highly
Mobile Predators, Global Advances in Biogeography, Dr. Lawrence Stevens (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0454-4,
InTech, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/global-advances-in-biogeography/biogeography-of-
dragonflies-and-damselflies-the-highly-mobile-predators-