Is chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer as tolerable and effective as in younger patients?

Divisions of Hematology-Oncology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology (Impact Factor: 1.54). 06/2012; 8(2):194-200. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01501.x
Source: PubMed


To analyze the chemotherapy regimens and outcomes of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients older than 70 years of age.
Between May 2001 and October 2009, 1135 patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer received palliative chemotherapy. Of these patients 56 (4.9%) were ≥70 years old and were analyzed retrospectively.
The median age at the time of first-line chemotherapy was 73 years (range, 70-85) and the median Charlson comorbidity index was 0 (0-5). In all 17 patients (30%) received surgery with curative or palliative intent; 43 (77%) were treated by doublet or triplet first-line chemotherapy regimens and 13 patients (23%) received single agent chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival for first-line chemotherapy was 3.97 months (95% CI 2.05-5.89) with an overall response rate of 26%. After the first-line chemotherapy, only 18 of 56 (32%) patients received second-line chemotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.4 months (95% CI 2.81-21.99). In multivariate analysis, receiving surgery and disease control for first-line chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for increased OS for all 56 patients.
Patients older ≥70 years with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer might achieve clinical benefit from chemotherapy. Receiving surgery and response of over more stable disease for first-line chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for increased OS.

6 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim: To analyze the results of chemotherapy applied at the Bülent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, to elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC). Methods: The study retrospectively investigated hospital records including pathological reports, imaging records, chemotherapy regimens, response and toxicity profile. All patients received systemic chemotherapy for pathologically proven metastatic GC at the Bülent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology. Results: From 2005 to 2012, 23 metastatic GC patients older than 70 years were treated with systemic chemotherapy as a first-line therapy. As the first-line chemotherapy, 17 (74%) patients received polychemotherapy and the remaining six (26%) patients received monotherapy. Overall, 113 cycles were administered. The median progression free survival (PFS) for the first-line chemotherapy was 6 months (95% CI, 0-16) and the median overall survival (OS) was 14 months (95% CI, 3-30). Multivariate analysis revealed that decreased OS was significantly associated with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (p=0.045), elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels at the diagnosis time (p = 0.040) and decreased number of chemotherapy cycles (p=0.019) with R-Sq (adj) = 41, 6%. One patient had a complete response with docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil combined (DCF) regimen and had 12 months of disease free survival (DFS). Conclusion: This is the first study investigating the outcomes of chemotherapy in Turkish elderly metastatic GC patients. Docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil combination were the most common regimen, which is a tolerable and effective choice in elderly patients who had good performance status.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2013 · Medicinski glasnik
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Palliative chemotherapy is used to prolong survival among elderly patients with inoperable gastric cancer (GC). We analyzed differences between single and combination first-line palliative chemotherapy among these patients. Methods Included patients were >70 years old and were treated for GC at four clinical centers of the Catholic University of Korea. Baseline characteristics, the first-line chemotherapy regimen, treatment responses, toxicities, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results Between 2005 and 2012, 178 > 70-year-old patients with GC received palliative chemotherapy using single or combination regimens. Median ages were 77 years (range 71–89) in the single regimen group (SG, 70 patients) and 73 years (range 71–81) in the combination group (CG, 108 patients). Patients in the SG received S-1 or capecitabine. The most common regimen in the CG was platinum combined with fluorouracil. The most common response in both groups was stable disease (SG, 45.7 %; CG, 48.1 %). In the SG and CG, median PFS times were 4.4 months (95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.85–5.95) and 4.1 months (95 % CI 2.62–5.57; P = 0.295), respectively; median OS times were 6.6 months (95 % CI 4.17–9.08) and 7.6 months (95 % CI 5.50–9.69; P = 0.782), respectively. Hematologic (P
    No preview · Article · Aug 2014 · Gastric Cancer
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Older patients with cancer are underrepresented in clinical trials, and thus, limited data are available on older patients with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC). This study was conducted to assess patterns of care, and outcomes of chemotherapy and its predictors, in older patients with MGC. Methods: Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) database, a nationwide population-based outcomes study was conducted. From the HIRA database, patients newly diagnosed with MGC in 2010 were identified (N = 1871). Results: Patients aged ≥70 years were defined as older patients (N = 792) and those aged <70 years as younger patients (N = 1079). Compared with younger patients, fewer older patients were diagnosed with MGC and received cancer treatment at high-volume medical institutions. Palliative chemotherapy was less frequently administered in older patients than in younger patients. In multivariate analyses, although combination chemotherapy as the first-line treatment (vs. monotherapy) and salvage chemotherapy after first-line chemotherapy (vs. no salvage chemotherapy) conferred more prolonged survival in the entire patient population, first-line combination chemotherapy did not provide an additional survival benefit in older patients compared to monotherapy. Conclusions: We found several barriers for older patients in approaching high-quality medical resources or receiving appropriate treatments. Although age was not an independent prognostic factor for survival in MGC, palliative chemotherapy was less frequently used in older patients. In our analysis, combination chemotherapy as the first-line treatment did not provide an additional benefit to older patients compared to monotherapy.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2015 · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology