Ethnographic study of collaborative knowledge work

IBM Software Group, One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
Ibm Systems Journal (Impact Factor: 1.79). 02/2006; 45(4):759 - 771. DOI: 10.1147/sj.454.0759
Source: IEEE Xplore


We present an ethnographic study in which we examine the ways collaborative knowledge work gets done in a process-oriented environment. The purpose of the study is to identify the kinds of support that knowledge workers could benefit from and to make recommendations for tools that might provide such support. The participants in this study, knowledge workers in various business domains, work in a collaborative environment; their skills are in their areas of expertise rather than computer science and programming. The data we collected are based on field interviews, on observation sessions, and on validation sessions using prototypes. We analyzed the field data using selected principles from grounded theory, and the results of each cycle were used to guide the research in subsequent cycles. In our findings we describe how knowledge workers develop their own strategies and techniques for getting their work done in complex, dynamic environments in which prescribed work processes serve only as reference models. By presenting instances of such environments from our study data, we illustrate how such individualized work processes are created and demonstrate the need for new supporting technologies and tools.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "Moreover, the prevalence of collaboration in complex, dynamic environments makes obsolete the traditional top-down approach to process design. Kogan and Muller (2006) and Hill et al. (2006) indeed report the widespread use of ad hoc collaboration and personal information management tools, while prescribed work processes serve "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, we analyze the contracting issues that arise in collaborative services, such as consulting, financial planning, and IT outsourcing. In particular, we investigate how the choice of contract type, among fixed-fee, time-and-materials, and performance-based contracts, is driven by the service environment characteristics. We find that fixed-fee contracts contingent on performance are preferred when the service output is more sensitive to the vendor's effort, that time-and-materials contracts are optimal when the output is more sensitive to the buyer's effort, and that performance-based contracts dominate when the output is equally sensitive to both the buyer's and the vendor's inputs. We also discuss how the performance of these contracts is affected with output uncertainty, process improvement opportunities, and the involvement of multiple buyers and vendors in the joint-production process. Our model highlights the trade-offs underlying the choice of contracts in a collaborative service environment and identifies service process design changes that improve contract efficiency.
    Preview · Article · May 2010 · Management Science
  • Source
    • "Results of those studies show that actual work is more situational and contingent than can be accommodated by fixed models [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] and that knowledge workers have their own modus operandi for doing their work [20]. Supporting customization is important to enable knowledge workers to develop their own strategies for working in complex and dynamic environments [20] [26]. Since software architects are also knowledge workers, we assert that the above findings apply to them as well. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: peer-reviewed When engineering complex software systems, the key Architectural Design Decisions (ADD) and the reasoning underlying those decisions need to be fully understood by all stakeholders. Achieving such understanding usually requires the use of ADD management tools. Most existing ADD management tools apply prescriptive ADD models and do not provide sufficient customizability. However, forcing architects to follow an ADD model that does not fit their specific needs can cause significant problems (e.g., extra cost is needed, and architects’ willingness and motivation can negatively be affected). This research project aims at solving this issue by developing a highly customizable solution, which can enable practitioners to define ADD models according to their preferences and working situations. The detailed needs for ADD model customization will be identified by multiple case studies and semi-structured interviews; the proposed solution will be evaluated using different empirical research methods.
    Full-text · Conference Paper · Mar 2010
  • Source
    • "Accordingly, the organization will hold the knowledge worker responsible of the self assigned tasks and empower him or her fully to achieve them. Based on a multistage ethnographic study, Kogan and Muller (2006) "

    Preview · Article · Nov 2009
Show more