Article

Use of Metal Oxide Nanoparticle Band Gap To Develop a Predictive Paradigm for Oxidative Stress and Acute Pulmonary Inflammation

California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1680, USA.
ACS Nano (Impact Factor: 12.88). 04/2012; 6(5):4349-68. DOI: 10.1021/nn3010087
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

We demonstrate for 24 metal oxide (MOx) nanoparticles that it is possible to use conduction band energy levels to delineate their toxicological potential at cellular and whole animal levels. Among the materials, the overlap of conduction band energy (E(c)) levels with the cellular redox potential (-4.12 to -4.84 eV) was strongly correlated to the ability of Co(3)O(4), Cr(2)O(3), Ni(2)O(3), Mn(2)O(3), and CoO nanoparticles to induce oxygen radicals, oxidative stress, and inflammation. This outcome is premised on permissible electron transfers from the biological redox couples that maintain the cellular redox equilibrium to the conduction band of the semiconductor particles. Both single-parameter cytotoxic as well as multi-parameter oxidative stress assays in cells showed excellent correlation to the generation of acute neutrophilic inflammation and cytokine responses in the lungs of C57 BL/6 mice. Co(3)O(4), Ni(2)O(3), Mn(2)O(3), and CoO nanoparticles could also oxidize cytochrome c as a representative redox couple involved in redox homeostasis. While CuO and ZnO generated oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation that is not predicted by E(c) levels, the adverse biological effects of these materials could be explained by their solubility, as demonstrated by ICP-MS analysis. These results demonstrate that it is possible to predict the toxicity of a large series of MOx nanoparticles in the lung premised on semiconductor properties and an integrated in vitro/in vivo hazard ranking model premised on oxidative stress. This establishes a robust platform for modeling of MOx structure-activity relationships based on band gap energy levels and particle dissolution. This predictive toxicological paradigm is also of considerable importance for regulatory decision-making about this important class of engineered nanomaterials.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Xiang Wang
  • Source
    • "Because of their simpler cell membrane structure, Gram-negative bacteria, like all rhizobium strains involved in legume nodulation, are more adversely affected by nanoparticles[33,34]. The interaction of nanoparticles with cellular organelles, redox active proteins such as NADPH oxidase and cell surface receptors can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), which may cause oxidative stress and DNA damage, thus disrupting cell division[33,3536373839. The release of soluble ions which bind with the functional groups of protein resulting in their denaturation has also been associated with the toxic effects of nano-ZnO, nano-CuO and Ag nanoparticles[4,40]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Experiments were carried out to study the effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles (nano-ZnO) on nitrogenase activity in legumes. In the first experiment, nodulated roots of cluster bean, moth bean, green gram and cowpea were dipped in Hoagland solution containing 1.5 and 10 μg mL−1 of nano-ZnO for 24 h. Nitrogenase activity in cluster bean, green gram and cowpea roots increased after dipping in solution containing 1.5 μg mL−1 nano-ZnO, but decreased in roots dipped in solution containing 10 μg mL−1 nano-ZnO. However, in moth bean roots, nitrogenase activity decreased after dipping in solution containing either concentration of nano-ZnO. In the second experiment, nodulated roots of green gram were dipped in Hoagland solution containing 1, 4, 6, 8 and 10 μg mL−1 nano-ZnO for 6–30 h before estimating nitrogenase activity. Results showed that an interactive effect of nano-ZnO concentration and exposure time influenced nitrogenase activity. The possible reasons behind this effect have been discussed. A model [A = 3.44 + 0.46t − 0.01t 2 − 0.002tc 2 (R 2 = 0.81)] involving linear and power components was developed to simulate the response of nitrogenase activity in green gram roots to the concentration and exposure time of nano-ZnO.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2015
  • Source
    • "Cells have multiple 103 pathways to limit ROS build-up (D'Autréaux and Toledano, 2007), but loss of cellular function 104 can occur when this capacity is exhausted. As summarized in Fig. 1d and 1f, metal and metal- 105 oxide NPs can induce ROS outside the cell, at the cell membrane, and inside the cell (when NPs 106 are internalized) by direct interaction with biomolecules in the environmental medium, the 107 cell/outer membrane, and organic cytoplasmic components, respectively, or via similar 108 interactions of dissolved metal ions with biomacromolecules (Park et al., 2009; Cabiscol et al., 109 2010; Dutta et al., 2012); recent studies of metal-oxide NPs have attempted to correlate 110 conduction band-edge positioning with respect to cellular redox potential and the resulting ability 111 to generate ROS (Zhang et al., 2012; Kaweeteerawat et al., 2015). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Metal and metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs) are used in numerous applications and have high likelihood of entering engineered and natural environmental systems. Careful assessment of the interaction of these NPs with bacteria, particularly biofilm bacteria, is necessary. This perspective discusses mechanisms of NP interaction with bacteria and identifies challenges in understanding NP-biofilm interaction, considering fundamental material attributes and inherent complexities of biofilm structure. The current literature is reviewed, both for planktonic bacteria and biofilms; future challenges and complexities are identified, both in light of the literature and a dataset on the toxicity of silver NPs toward planktonic and biofilm bacteria. This perspective aims to highlight the complexities in such studies and emphasizes the needs for systematic evaluation of NP-biofilm interaction.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2015 · Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Source
    • "Their conclusion was in a good agreement with the results of Burello and Worth (2011b), who found that the conduction band energy of oxide NPs is related to their toxicity. Similar findings have also been reported by Zhang et al. (2012), who indicated that the oxidative stress induced by MO-NPs could be linked to their conduction and valance band energies. More recently, Singh and Gupta (2014) attempted to build classification and regression nano-(Q)SAR models using ensemble methods such as decision tree forest (DTF) and decision tree boost (DTB). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is increasing recognition that some nanomaterials may pose a risk to human health and the environment. Moreover, the industrial use of the novel engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) increases at a higher rate than data generation for hazard assessment; consequently, many of them remain untested. The large number of nanomaterials and their variants (e.g., different sizes and coatings) requiring testing and the ethical pressure towards nonanimal testing means that in a first instance, expensive animal bioassays are precluded, and the use of (quantitative) structure–activity relationships ((Q)SARs) models as an alternative source of (screening) hazard information should be explored. (Q)SAR modelling can be applied to contribute towards filling important knowledge gaps by making best use of existing data, prioritizing the physicochemical parameters driving toxicity, and providing practical solutions for the risk assessment problems caused by the diversity of ENMs. This paper covers the core components required for successful application of (Q)SAR methods to ENM toxicity prediction, summarizes the published nano-(Q)SAR studies, and outlines the challenges ahead for nano-(Q)SAR modelling. It provides a critical review of (1) the present availability of ENM characterization/toxicity data, (2) the characterization of nanostructures that meet the requirements for (Q)SAR analysis, (3) published nano-(Q)SAR studies and their limitations, (4) in silico tools for (Q)SAR screening of nanotoxicity, and (5) prospective directions for the development of nano-(Q)SAR models.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2015 · Particuology
Show more