Clinical Stability of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis does not Correlate with Intraoperative Stability

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Impact Factor: 2.77). 04/2012; 470(8):2274-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2339-y
Source: PubMed


The most important objective of clinical classifications of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is to identify hips associated with a high risk of avascular necrosis (AVN)--so-called unstable or acute slips; however, closed surgery makes confirmation of physeal stability difficult. Performing the capital realignment procedure in SCFE treatment we observed that clinical estimation of physeal stability did not always correlate with intraoperative findings at open surgery. This motivated us to perform a systematic comparison of the clinical classification systems with the intraoperative observations.
We asked: (1) Is the classification of an acute versus chronic slip based on the duration of symptoms sensitive and specific in detecting intraoperative disrupted physes in patients with SCFE? (2) Is the stable/unstable classification system based on clinical symptoms sensitive and specific in detecting intraoperative disrupted physes in patients with SCFE?
We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients with SCFE treated by open surgery between 1996 and 2009. We classified the clinical stability of all hips using the classifications based on onset of symptoms and on function. We classified intraoperative stability as intact or disrupted. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of two classification systems to determine intraoperative stability.
Complete physeal disruption at open surgery was seen in 28 of the 82 hips (34%). With classification as acute, acute-on-chronic, and chronic, the sensitivity for disrupted physes was 82% and the specificity was 44%. With the classification of Loder et al., the values were 39% and 76%, respectively.
Current clinical classification systems are limited in accurately diagnosing the physeal stability in SCFE.
Level III, retrospective diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

1 Follower
6 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Developmental dysplasia is subsequent to global or local growth retardation, mainly of the acetabulum. There is individual growth retardation as well as influence of adverse mechanical forces which are responsable for the development of hip dysplasia, taking place in fetal life and/or after birth. Hip dysplasia is not an uniform anterolateral insufficiency of coverage of the femoral head but shows a multitude of pure and combined anterior, lateral, and posterior dysplasia. Overload of the rim generates pressure point loading which leads to rapid degenerative arthritis. It can be successfully treated by reestablishing and maintaining centralised pressure of the femoral head. Correction on the acetabular side improve coverage, load transmission area and stability of the femoral head. The periacetabular osteotomy is a very powerful technique, offering the ability to correct deformity in all planes. However, just like any surgical technique, the indications and limitations of the technique must be understood. Femoral osteotomies continue to be indicated as an additional correction of excessive valgus and anteversion of the neck and are normally executed at the intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric level. Intraarticular femoral osteotomies are more direct and therefore allow a more powerful correction with no o very little undesired side correction.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2013 · Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Traditionally arthrotomy has rarely been performed during surgery for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). As a result, most pathophysiological information about the articular surfaces was derived clinically and radiographically. Novel insights regarding deformity-induced damage and epiphyseal perfusion became available with surgical hip dislocation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We (1) determined the influence of chronicity of prodromal symptoms and severity of SCFE deformity on severity of cartilage damage. (2) In surgically confirmed disconnected epiphyses, we determined the influence of injury and time to surgery on epiphyseal perfusion; and (3) the frequency of new bone at the posterior neck potentially reducing perfusion during epimetaphyseal reduction. METHODS: We reviewed 116 patients with 119 SCFE and available records treated between 1996 and 2011. Acetabular cartilage damage was graded as +/++/+++ in 109 of the 119 hips. Epiphyseal perfusion was determined with laser-Doppler flowmetry at capsulotomy and after reduction. Information about bone at the posterior neck was retrieved from operative reports. RESULTS: Ninety-seven of 109 hips (89%) had documented cartilage damage; severity was not associated with higher slip angle or chronicity; disconnected epiphyses had less damage. Temporary or definitive cessation of perfusion in disconnected epiphyses increased with time to surgery; posterior bone resection improved the perfusion. In one necrosis, the retinaculum was ruptured; two were in the group with the longest time interval. Posterior bone formation is frequent in disconnected epiphyses, even without prodromal periods. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing the cause of cartilage damage (cam impingement) should become an integral part of SCFE surgery. Early surgery for disconnected epiphyses appears to reduce the risk of necrosis. Slip reduction without resection of posterior bone apposition may jeopardize epiphyseal perfusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2013 · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

  • No preview · Article · Feb 2013 · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Show more