Dry spell analysis and maize yields for two semi-arid locations in East Africa
Natural Resources Management, Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
(Impact Factor: 3.76).
06/2003; 117(1-2):23-37. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1923(03)00037-6
High variability in rainfall occurrence and amounts together with high evaporative demand create severe constraints for crop growth and yields in dry sub-humid and semi-arid farming areas in east Africa. Meteorological analyses on rainfall distribution are common, but generally focus on assessing drought occurrence on annual and seasonal basis. This paper presents two types of seasonal dry spell analysis, using easy accessible data on daily rainfall and evapotranspiration for two semi-arid locations in east Africa for 20–23 years. The meteorological dry spell analysis was obtained by Markov chain process, and the agricultural dry spell analysis used rainfall data in a simple water balance model also describing impact on maize (Zea mays L.) growth due to water availability on clay or sandy soil. The meteorological dry spell analysis showed a minimum probability of 20% of dry spells exceeding 10 days at both sites, increasing to 70% or more depending on onset of season, during approximate flowering and early grain filling stage. The agricultural dry spell analysis showed that maize was exposed to at least one dry spell of 10 days or longer in 74–80% of seasons at both sites. Maize on sandy soil experienced dry spells exceeding 10 days, three–four times more often than maize on clay soil during flowering and grain filling stages. In addition, the water balance analysis indicated substantial water losses by surface runoff and deep percolation as the crop utilised only 36–64% on average of seasonal rainfall. Such large proportion of non-productive water flow in the field water balance may provide scope for dry spell mitigation through improved water management strategies.
Available from: Milton E. Pereira Flores
- "Dry spells (Barron et al., 2003) and late onset/ early cessation of the growing season (Sivakumar, 1988; Mugalavai et al., 2008) have been identified as other limiting factors to crop yields. Dry spells may affect crop growth and final yields, even without significant reductions in seasonal rainfall totals (Barron et al., 2003). However, the severity of dry spells on plant growth and, hence yields, depends largely on the stage of plant development and crop type. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Climate is one of the major factors controlling agricultural productivity in Africa. Changes in meteorological variables such as rising temperatures, changes in precipitation and increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels affect crop production. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impacts of climate change and variability, and crop management on yield of maize (Zea mays L.) grown in the southern part of Tanzania. Using the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer Cropping System Model (DSSAT-CSM), a series of sensitivity experiments were conducted to evaluate the response of maize yields to a range of principal changes in rainfall and temperatures. The sensitivities were estimated under two management practices, one with traditional farming practices, and the other with application of external farm inputs. Dry-spells during the growing season caused yield losses of all cultivars of up to 43% for the prolonged dry-spells of 20 days. Increased rainfall intensity, during vegetative and reproductive stages, caused the decrease in yield of 5 and 2%, respectively. A 50-100% decrease in rainfall intensity during the growing season caused a loss of yields between 40-100%. Increased or decreased temperatures from the baseline values reduced or increased days to flowering and to physiological maturity, respectively. In addition, a decrease in temperature from the baseline values to 2 o C had an overall impact of yields loss for all cultivars. However, yields increased with an increase of temperature by up to 2.5 °C (UH6303 and H628) and 4.5 °C (PAN691). Growing seasons with lower total rainfall (<50 mm) and temperature (<1°C) from their climatological values, caused yield loss as much as 71 and 15%, respectively for PAN691 cultivar. Generally, the impacts depended on the management, cultivar, soil characteristics, magnitude, timing and duration of the stress.
Available from: Yihun Dile
- "Different management techniques have been suggested to improve water productivity and produce " more crop per drop of rain " (Rockstrom et al., 2002). Water harvesting systems are among the technologies that have shown substantial productivity improvements in different regions in sub-Saharan Africa (Barron et al., 2003; Dile et al., 2013b; Fox and Rockstrom, 2003; Oweis and Hachum, 2006). Dile et al. (2013b) conceptually showed that water harvesting systems can build resilience and thereby result in sustainable agricultural intensification. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Water harvesting systems have improved productivity in various regions in sub-Saharan Africa. Similarly, they can help retain water in landscapes, build resilience against droughts and dry spells, and thereby contribute to sustainable agricultural intensification. However, there is no strong empirical evidence that shows the effects of intensification of water harvesting on upstream–downstream social–ecological systems at a landscape scale. In this paper we develop a decision support system (DSS) for locating and sizing water harvesting ponds in a hydrological model, which enables assessments of water harvesting intensification on upstream–downstream ecosystem services in meso-scale watersheds. The DSS was used with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) for a case-study area located in the Lake Tana basin, Ethiopia. We found that supplementary irrigation in combination with nutrient application increased simulated teff (Eragrostis tef, staple crop in Ethiopia) production up to three times, compared to the current practice. Moreover, after supplemental irrigation of teff, the excess water was used for dry season onion production of 7.66 t/ha (median). Water harvesting, therefore, can play an important role in increasing local- to regional-scale food security through increased and more stable food production and generation of extra income from the sale of cash crops. The annual total irrigation water consumption was ~ 4%–30% of the annual water yield from the entire watershed. In general, water harvesting resulted in a reduction in peak flows and an increase in low flows. Water harvesting substantially reduced sediment yield leaving the watershed. The beneficiaries of water harvesting ponds may benefit from increases in agricultural production. The downstream social–ecological systems may benefit from reduced food prices, reduced flooding damages, and reduced sediment influxes, as well as enhancements in low flows and water quality. The benefits of water harvesting warrant economic feasibility studies and detailed analyses of its ecological impacts.
- "There is only one main river crossing the catchment from north to south with a temporary water flow during rainy seasons. The high rainfall variability in time, space and altitude is also associated with long and frequent dry spells (Barron et al., 2003; Enfors & Gordon, 2007; Pachpute, 2010). The vegetation cover varies from forest to dense bushland in the highland and sparse bushland to degraded land in the lowlands. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Land conversion in Sub-Saharan Africa has profound biophysical, ecological, political and social consequences for human wellbeing and ecosystems services. Understanding the process of land cover changes and transitions is essential for good ecosystem management policy that would lead to improved agricultural production, human wellbeing and ecosystems health. This study aimed to assess land cover transitions in a typical semi-arid degraded agro-ecosystems environment within the Pangani River Basin in northern Tanzania. Three Landsat images spanning over 30 years were used to detect random and systematic patterns of land cover transition in a landscape dominated by crop and livestock farming. Results revealed that current land cover transition is driven by a systematic process of change dominated by (i) transition from degraded land to sparse bushland (10.8%), (ii) conversion from sparse bushland to dense bushland in lowland areas (6.0%), (iii) conversion from bushland to forest (4.8%), and (iv) conversion from dense bushland to cropland in the highlands (4.5%). Agricultural lands under water harvesting technology adoption show a high degree of persistence (60-80%) between time slices. This suggests that there is a trend in land-use change towards vegetation improvement in the catchment with a continuous increase in the adoption of water harvesting technologies for crop and livestock farming. This can be interpreted as a sign of agricultural intensification and vegetation re-growth in the catchment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.