Photos of cover pages: © J. Wang.
The entire process of sustainable urban development is creative, changeable and challengeable. It requires new urban and landscape planning methods and government responses as well as management capacities to mitigate climate change, halt biodiversity loss and enhance ecosystem services. As an innovative planning and strategic method, urban green infrastructure planning aims to meet these challenges, in particular, by promoting multifunctionality and connectivity in green infrastructure. Nevertheless, the role of urban green infrastructure and the multiple ecosystem services provided by green infrastructure in urban areas is still marginal in urban planning processes. The lack of adequate mapping and functional analysis methods is a significant factor in this. This dissertation, comprised of three papers, explores urban green infrastructure planning as an approach to enhancing multifunctional greenspace networks for sustainable urban development. It investigates the character of urban green infrastructure planning and fills research gaps by analyzing its multiple functions and undertaking connectivity mapping. Key research topics are the conceptual evolution of green infrastructure, the assessment of multifunctional green infrastructure as well as the spatial patterns in relation to equitable access for citizens to urban green spaces. First, Paper I focuses on the conceptual development of green infrastructure and its respective functional analysis at various spatial scales. It examines what green infrastructure actually measures, and questions whether its current manifestations are consistent with its conceptual development. Furthermore, it seeks to find out whether there are specific trends in the conceptual evolution of definitions of green infrastructure, and whether there are gaps between this evolution and the implementation of green infrastructure in the context of advancing sustainable development. It demonstrates that at this point in time, multifunctionality is a core feature of green infrastructure and central to the evolving green infrastructure concept. Other important features or concepts related to green infrastructure are connectivity, sustainability, protection of biodiversity, urban focus as well as inter- and transdisciplinary collaboration. Paper I proposes ways of enhancing and applying the green infrastructure concept in the future, taking into consideration these key concepts. A key finding of Paper I is the lack of an integrative framework for the assessment of multifunctional green infrastructure. In order to reduce this deficit, in Paper II, an integrated indicator framework is developed to evaluate the multiple ecosystem services provided by green infrastructure in urban areas. The second paper emphasizes that a clear framework and methodology are crucial for the sustainable management of spatially oriented green infrastructure plans over time and for different stakeholder groups. Hence, it proposes an explicit framework and methodology for the assessment of multifunctional green infrastructure, while addressing the pillars of urban sustainability (ecology, socio-economy, socio-culture and human health) and the multifunctionality of green infrastructure explicitly. For the purpose of validation, the integrative framework and methodology developed here are applied to an illustrative case study in Leipzig, Germany. This exemplification contains three stages of assessment: a conceptual framework for priority setting, a contextual assessment as well as a retrospective assessment. In total, 18 indicators are employed, and both hot and cold spots of selected green infrastructure functions and their multifunctionality are identified. Green infrastructure planners and policy makers may refer to this integrative indicator framework, which provides an application methodology as common grounds for better mutual understanding among scientists and stakeholders. To advance the principles proposed in Paper I and answer the question of to what extent spatial patterns of urban green infrastructure may affect the spatial equity of access to urban green infrastructure for citizens, Paper III analyzes nine selected sample sites with regard to the connectivity of, and equitable access to, urban green infrastructure, representing three typical residential areas in the City of Leipzig, the fastest growing city in Germany. The third paper employs the morphological spatial pattern analysis approach (one finding of Paper I), exploring urban green infrastructure patterns in three typical residential districts in order to verify the similarities between the characteristics of spatial patterns in each residential type and to observe a tendency of increasing equity from (semi-)detached houses to linear housing through to perimeter blocks. It depicts the spatial equity of green infrastructure distributions in typical residential areas from a morphological perspective, and thus further underpins urban green infrastructure planning for strategic networks as a key principle in the urban green infrastructure concept. The results pinpoint the necessity of developing further green infrastructure links in order to enhance structural connectivity as well as spatial equity. Overall, urbanization processes increase the need for urban green infrastructure to support the well-being of urban dwellers and to underpin a sustainable planning strategy. It is a challenge for urban planning to make cities socio-spatially equitable; it requires strategic planning based on measured gradients of spatial equity for green infrastructure. In conclusion, strategic urban green infrastructure planning should take into account the inherent spatial patterns and foster a fair distribution of green infrastructure towards spatial equity. The integrative framework, methodology and results regarding the assessment of multifunctional green infrastructure and urban green infrastructure planning presented here contribute to discourses regarding the enhancement of the green infrastructure concept; they are expected to provoke further discussion on how to improve analytical methods for remote sensing data as well as how to exploit best remote-sensing-based methods at multiple spatial, temporal and spectral scales to support green infrastructure plans.