Summary
The current study compared growth, feeding efficiency, digestibility,
sa ti ation level, body components and investigated the physiological aspects
of hematological analysis, blood chemistry, immune status, and enzymatic
antioxidants to evaluate the effectiveness of using pomegranate Punica
granatum peel powder and its aqueous and alcoholic extracts as feed
additives in the diets of common carp Cyprinus carpio
The experiment was conducted
at the laboratories of the Aquaculture
Unit Coll ege of Agriculture , University of Basrah . The fish were acclimatized
for a week before the experiment. The experiment lasted for 70 days from
3 March to 12 May, 2023. A commercial diet with known chemical
composition (as control treatment C) was used, and 0.5% and 1% of
Pomegranate peel powder and its aqueous and alcoholic extracts as
treatments (T1=0.5%, T2=1% crude powder , T3=0.5%, T4=1% alcoholic
extract powder , T5=0.5%, T6=1% aqueous extract powder
The phenolic antioxidant content of the alcoholic and aqueous extract
was measured, which amounted to 175.95 mg of gallic acid/100g and
151.09 mg of gallic acid/100g, respectively, while the flavonoids were
42.89 mg of rutin/100g and 36.04 mg of rutin/100g , respectively. In
addition to detecting tannins and saponins.
The results showed that the weight gain (WG)
was improved
significantly (P 0.05) in groups T3, T4 and T6 compared to the control
group (C). The T3 group achieved the highest weight gain and its value
was 17.55 gm, while the value of the control group (C) was 10.78 gm.
While the specific growth (SGR) was significantly improved (P 0.05) for
each of the groups of raw pomegranate peel powder and its extracts, as
B
the groups of alcoholic extract T3 an
the groups of alcoholic extract T3 and T4 and aqueous extract T5 were d T4 and aqueous extract T5 were superior to the control group (C). There were no significant differences superior to the control group (C). There were no significant differences (P>0.05) between the extraction groups either in SGR or relative (RGR) (P>0.05) between the extraction groups either in SGR or relative (RGR) and daily growth (DGR). Whereas, Survival was high (Pand daily growth (DGR). Whereas, Survival was high (P≤≤0.05) for all 0.05) for all groups. Thegroups. The results showed that pomegranate peels and their extracts results showed that pomegranate peels and their extracts improved the food conversion rate (FCR), as the T3 group recorded the improved the food conversion rate (FCR), as the T3 group recorded the best food conversion ratio (3.91), while it increased in the control group (C) best food conversion ratio (3.91), while it increased in the control group (C) as it reached 6.52, the same way with respect to as it reached 6.52, the same way with respect to protein efficiency protein efficiency ratio ratio (PER).(PER).
On the other hand, there
On the other hand, there waswas a significant superiority (Pa significant superiority (P≤≤0.05) of the 0.05) of the total apparent digestion coefficient (ADC) for fish fed on diets containing total apparent digestion coefficient (ADC) for fish fed on diets containing pomegranate peels and their alcoholic and aqueous extracts, as T3 pomegranate peels and their alcoholic and aqueous extracts, as T3 recorded threcorded the highest value of 68.73 and with a significant difference e highest value of 68.73 and with a significant difference (P<0.05) for the group Control (C) and groups T1 and T2. In the same (P<0.05) for the group Control (C) and groups T1 and T2. In the same context, the results showed a significant increase in the level of satcontext, the results showed a significant increase in the level of satiiation ation (LS) (P(LS) (P≤≤0.05) in the control group (C), which 0.05) in the control group (C), which recorded a value of 3.51 over recorded a value of 3.51 over the other groups. There were no significant differences (P>0.05) between the other groups. There were no significant differences (P>0.05) between the treatment of pomegranate peels and its alcoholic and aqueous extracts. the treatment of pomegranate peels and its alcoholic and aqueous extracts. Regarding the hepatRegarding the hepatoo--somatic indexsomatic index (HSI)(HSI), there was a significant (P, there was a significant (P≤≤0.05) 0.05) supsuperiority of pomegranate peels and its extracts, except for the T1 group, eriority of pomegranate peels and its extracts, except for the T1 group, which did not differ significantly (P>0.05) with the control group (C).which did not differ significantly (P>0.05) with the control group (C).
Regarding the chemical composition of the fish body, the results
Regarding the chemical composition of the fish body, the results showed no significant differences (P>0.05) betshowed no significant differences (P>0.05) between all groups in moisture ween all groups in moisture content. The T3 group had a significant (Pcontent. The T3 group had a significant (P≤≤0.05) superiority in protein 0.05) superiority in protein compared with the control group (C), which recorded the highest value of compared with the control group (C), which recorded the highest value of 16.66%. The results showed that the amount of fat decreased compared 16.66%. The results showed that the amount of fat decreased compared to the preto the pre--expexperiment, T1 and T4 recorded significant differences (Periment, T1 and T4 recorded significant differences (P≤≤0.05) 0.05)
C
with the control group (C). The results showed that there were no significant
with the control group (C). The results showed that there were no significant differences (P>0.05) between all groups for ash content, and it also differences (P>0.05) between all groups for ash content, and it also decreased compared to the predecreased compared to the pre--experiment.experiment.
It was
It was observed through the results of observed through the results of ccomplete omplete bblood lood ccountount (CBC)(CBC) ttestest that the values of white blood cells (WBC) were elevated in that the values of white blood cells (WBC) were elevated in pomegranate peels and extracts compared to the control group (C), but the pomegranate peels and extracts compared to the control group (C), but the rise was not significant (P>0.05). The results showed tharise was not significant (P>0.05). The results showed that the values of red t the values of red blood cells (RBC) increased in the groups of pomegranate peels and their blood cells (RBC) increased in the groups of pomegranate peels and their extracts. The results showed that Lymphocytes count was also elevated in extracts. The results showed that Lymphocytes count was also elevated in pomegranate peels and extracts (Ppomegranate peels and extracts (P≤≤0.05), except for T1 and T4. As for the 0.05), except for T1 and T4. As for the Neutrophils, theNeutrophils, they showed significant superiority of T1 and the extracts y showed significant superiority of T1 and the extracts groups (Pgroups (P≤≤0.05), with the exception of T6 with the control group (C), as for 0.05), with the exception of T6 with the control group (C), as for Monocytes, there were no significant differences (P>0.05) between the Monocytes, there were no significant differences (P>0.05) between the groups with the group control (C) except for T3. As fgroups with the group control (C) except for T3. As for the results of or the results of hemoglobin (HGB), it is noted that T2 and T6 have a significant (P>0.05) hemoglobin (HGB), it is noted that T2 and T6 have a significant (P>0.05) decrease, and they recorded the lowest values 5.53 and 6.29 mg / 100 ml, decrease, and they recorded the lowest values 5.53 and 6.29 mg / 100 ml, respectively, while the rest of the groups did not record significant respectively, while the rest of the groups did not record significant differences (P>0.05) wdifferences (P>0.05) with the control treatment (C). On the other hand, ith the control treatment (C). On the other hand, packed cell volume (PCV) results showed that T4 recorded the highest packed cell volume (PCV) results showed that T4 recorded the highest value of 23.67%, significantly superior (Pvalue of 23.67%, significantly superior (P≤≤0.05) to T2 and the control group 0.05) to T2 and the control group (C). Regarding the Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) in the bloo(C). Regarding the Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) in the blood of d of common carp fish that was measured at the end of the experiment, the common carp fish that was measured at the end of the experiment, the results showed that there were no significant differences between the results showed that there were no significant differences between the groups (P>0.05) except for T1. Also, in the results of the Mean corpuscular groups (P>0.05) except for T1. Also, in the results of the Mean corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH), it was noted throuHemoglobin (MCH), it was noted through the results that there were no gh the results that there were no significant differences (P>0.05) between the raw pomegranate peels groups significant differences (P>0.05) between the raw pomegranate peels groups and the control group (C). While the alcoholic and aqueous extracts were and the control group (C). While the alcoholic and aqueous extracts were
D
significantly (P>0.05) retarded compared to the control group (C). As for
significantly (P>0.05) retarded compared to the control group (C). As for tthe mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), the results he mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), the results showed that there were no significant differences (P>0.05) between the showed that there were no significant differences (P>0.05) between the groups.groups.
In addition
In addition, it is noted from the results of the blood biochemical , it is noted from the results of the blood biochemical indicatorindicatorss that glucose didn't differ significantly (P>0.05) among all groups that glucose didn't differ significantly (P>0.05) among all groups except T1, and the results of triglycerides showed that it did not differ except T1, and the results of triglycerides showed that it did not differ significantly (P>0.05) among all groups except T5, which recorded the significantly (P>0.05) among all groups except T5, which recorded the highest value of 143.15. mg/100 ml. With reghighest value of 143.15. mg/100 ml. With regard to cholesterol, the results ard to cholesterol, the results showed a decrease in blood serum, and the groups were significantly showed a decrease in blood serum, and the groups were significantly (P(P≤≤0.05) superior to the control group (C), the same way for total proteins, 0.05) superior to the control group (C), the same way for total proteins, as for globulin and albumin, they did not differ significantly (P>0.05) in all as for globulin and albumin, they did not differ significantly (P>0.05) in all groups.groups.
At the same level, it was observed through the results of liver
At the same level, it was observed through the results of liver enzymes that the alkaline phosphatase (AST) enzymes that the alkaline phosphatase (AST) enzyme enzyme decreased in the decreased in the blood serum, as it appears that the highest value was in the control group blood serum, as it appears that the highest value was in the control group (C), which did not differ significantly ((C), which did not differ significantly (P>0.05) with T1, T2, T5, and T6, while P>0.05) with T1, T2, T5, and T6, while The T3 and T4 groups were significantly superior (PThe T3 and T4 groups were significantly superior (P≤≤0.05). The enzyme 0.05). The enzyme alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were significantly decreased (Psignificantly decreased (P≤≤0.05). The results showed a significant 0.05). The results showed a significant improvement iimprovement in kidney efficiency (Pn kidney efficiency (P≤≤0.05), as urea, uric acid and creatine 0.05), as urea, uric acid and creatine decreased compared with the control treatment (Pdecreased compared with the control treatment (P≤≤0.05).0.05).
The results showed that the values of lysozyme were significantly The results showed that the values of lysozyme were significantly superior (Psuperior (P≤≤0.05) in the treatments of pomegranate peels and its extrac0.05) in the treatments of pomegranate peels and its extracts, ts, compared with the control treatment (C). The enzymatic antioxidants compared with the control treatment (C). The enzymatic antioxidants (catalase and glutathione (GPx)) showed a significant improvement (catalase and glutathione (GPx)) showed a significant improvement (P(P≤≤0.05) compared with the control group (C) for pomegranate peels and 0.05) compared with the control group (C) for pomegranate peels and
E
extracts. The results of lactic acid bacteria (
extracts. The results of lactic acid bacteria (LAB)LAB) countcount showed that the showed that the groups supplemented with pomegranate peel powder and its alcoholic and groups supplemented with pomegranate peel powder and its alcoholic and aqueous extracts were statistically superior (P>0.05) to the control aqueous extracts were statistically superior (P>0.05) to the control treatment, treatment, while gramwhile gram--negative bacteria negative bacteria followfollow the same the same trendtrend..
In conclusion,
In conclusion, itit appears through the study that the addition of appears through the study that the addition of pomegranate peels and its extracts has enhanced growth parameters and pomegranate peels and its extracts has enhanced growth parameters and nutritional efficiency in addition to the health and immunological status, and nutritional efficiency in addition to the health and immunological status, and the results have shown that the alcoholic extract at 0.5% ithe results have shown that the alcoholic extract at 0.5% is more efficient s more efficient than the aqueous extract at 1%.than the aqueous extract at 1%.