Sexist language in occupational information: Does it make a difference?
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill USA Journal of Vocational Behavior
(Impact Factor: 2.59).
10/1983; 23(2):227-232. DOI: 10.1016/0001-8791(83)90036-2
While several guidelines for avoiding sexist language in career materials have been published, little empirical evidence exists to support the assumption that sexist language in career information has deleterious effects on clients. The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of sex-biased language in occupational information on subject interest and attitudes regarding gender appropriateness of occupations. Eighth-grade students read occupational briefs on two occupations presented in either neutral, female-biased, or male-biased language. Results showed a nonsignificant language effect and a significant sex difference in interest in the occupations. A significant three-way interaction (language by subject sex by occupation) was found for gender-appropriateness ratings. The findings, together with previous research, suggest that language may have little impact on specific occupational interests, but may affect other career attitudes related to interests.
Available from: Tristram Hooley
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This article reviews the literature related to vocational behavior and career development published during 1983. Journals in the fields of psychology, sociology, and organizational behavior were examined, and 445 relevant articles published in 42 different journals were identified. The review is organized around issues pertinent to the counseling psychology perspective (i.e., career development, vocational choice, vocational behavior of women, assessment, intervention strategies) and the industrial/organizational psychology perspective (i.e., personnel functions, worker adjustment problems, work adjustment) on vocational behavior.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: 75 18–55 yr old females attending a trades fair for women and either currently engaged in or searching for nontraditional employment completed a questionnaire about their demographics, education and training, childhood and adult family, and current employment status. Results show that 38.5% of Ss were employed in skilled crafts (average length of employment 3 yrs). Over 40% were employed by private contractors, 22% worked for public or government employers, and 36.4% indicated other sources of employment. Ss held strong views of sex-role equality. Money and fringe benefits were the most commonly mentioned reasons for pursuit of nontraditional work; Unemployed Ss cited their reason more frequently than employed Ss. Employed Ss were more attracted to the nature of the work or environment than were unemployed Ss. Lack of work experience and previous exposure to nontraditional work were the most frequently cited barriers to employment. Employed Ss were 4 times as likely to be union members as were unemployed Ss. (10 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.