While various experiments had been performed in the past to determine the nature of tissue changes as the result of applied forces, we still felt that the whole question regarding the extent of tissue involvement and its behavior to the forces used in orthodontic treatment was very much in an empiric state. A series of experiments was instituted, therefore, in which typical methods of orthodontic treatment were employed, the changes noted clinically, and the animals subsequently sacrificed for a careful histologic study. The animal used was the Macacus rhesus. Two standard methods of treatment for Class II malocclusions were used; one, intermaxillary pressure by means of rubber bands and the other, jumping the bite. In histologic study the alveolar bone surrounding the posterior teeth, the angle of the jaw, and the temporomandibular joint were all studied. Changes were found in all of these regions to indicate, through the evidence of apposition and resorption, that the forces applied resulted not only in a mesial movement of the posterior teeth but also to indicate a reorientation of the position of the body of the mandible by a change in the angle of the jaw and changes in the form and position of the condyle head and glenoid fossa. To determine whether these changes were due entirely to the forces applied, an additional experiment for verification was performed in which the forces applied were as if for treatment of Class III malocclusion. These forces were, therefore, in an opposite direction and the findings showed changes directly opposite in direction to those applied in treatment of Class II malocclusion.Because of the changes observed at the angle of the jaw and the temporomandibular joint, a method is suggested to correct cases of Class II malocclusion by means of forward movement of the body of the mandible without movement of the teeth in the mesial direction from their alveoli.